Give and Take

Give and Take Plot Summary

Introduction

Success in professional life has traditionally been associated with competitiveness, self-promotion, and strategic networking. However, emerging research challenges this conventional wisdom by revealing a counterintuitive pattern: those who consistently contribute to others without expecting immediate returns often achieve extraordinary success. This paradox of giving presents a fascinating lens through which to examine achievement across various domains, from business and medicine to engineering and education. The most successful individuals aren't necessarily the most ruthlessly self-interested, nor are they completely selfless martyrs. Instead, they practice a nuanced form of strategic generosity that creates value for others while advancing their own goals. Understanding the mechanics of effective giving provides profound insights into how we might approach our careers, relationships, and organizational cultures. By examining the psychological foundations of different reciprocity styles, the structural conditions that enable sustainable giving, and the strategies that prevent exploitation, we gain a more sophisticated understanding of how generosity functions as a pathway to success. This perspective challenges us to move beyond simplistic notions of selfishness versus selflessness toward a more integrated view where contributing to others becomes not just morally admirable but strategically advantageous. The evidence suggests that in our increasingly interconnected world, the ability to give effectively may represent one of the most undervalued skills for achieving meaningful success.

Chapter 1: The Three Reciprocity Styles: Givers, Takers, and Matchers

When we interact with others, we have fundamental choices about how to approach these exchanges. We can focus primarily on what we can get from others, what we can give to them, or maintain a careful balance between the two. These approaches represent distinct reciprocity styles that profoundly shape our professional trajectories and relationships. Takers approach interactions with a primary focus on extracting value. They prioritize their own interests and carefully guard their time and resources, offering help to others only when the personal benefits clearly outweigh the costs. While takers aren't necessarily malicious, they operate from a fundamentally self-protective stance, believing that in a competitive world, looking out for themselves is the most rational approach. This style can yield short-term advantages, particularly in environments that reward individual achievement and where interactions are primarily transactional. However, takers often develop reputations that ultimately limit their effectiveness, as others become reluctant to share information, opportunities, or support with them. Matchers, representing the most common reciprocity style in professional contexts, operate on the principle of balanced exchange. They help others with the expectation of receiving equivalent benefits in return, carefully tracking the ledger of giving and receiving to ensure fairness. This approach feels intuitively fair to many people and provides protection against exploitation. Matchers build relationships based on mutual benefit and clear expectations, creating networks where favors flow in predictable patterns. While this style avoids the reputational costs of taking and the potential exploitation risks of giving, it limits opportunities for unexpected benefits that might emerge from more generous approaches. Givers constitute the third reciprocity style, characterized by contributing to others without keeping score or expecting immediate returns. They help colleagues solve problems, share knowledge freely, make introductions that benefit others, and volunteer for responsibilities that serve the group. This orientation stems not necessarily from pure altruism but from a different calculation of self-interest—one that considers longer time horizons and broader definitions of success. Givers recognize that in interconnected environments, contributing to others' success ultimately creates conditions that enable their own achievement. Intriguingly, research across diverse fields reveals that givers are overrepresented at both the bottom and top of success metrics. The least successful givers become doormats, sacrificing their own productivity and well-being through indiscriminate helping. They say yes to every request, fail to set boundaries with takers, and ultimately burn out from excessive giving. However, the most successful individuals are also frequently givers—but they give differently. These successful givers contribute strategically, focusing their generosity where it creates the most impact while protecting themselves from exploitation. This pattern challenges conventional assumptions about success, suggesting that giving itself isn't inherently advantageous or disadvantageous. Rather, the critical factor is how one gives—whether in ways that are sustainable and strategic or indiscriminate and depleting. Understanding this distinction provides crucial insights into how generosity can function as a pathway to achievement rather than an obstacle to it.

Chapter 2: The Giver's Paradox: Why Selfless Givers Fail While Otherish Givers Succeed

The paradoxical distribution of givers at both the bottom and top of success metrics reveals a crucial distinction between two approaches to giving. Selfless givers—those who help others without regard for their own needs—often experience burnout, exploitation, and diminished productivity. In contrast, successful givers practice what might be called "otherish" giving—contributing to others in ways that are both high in impact for recipients and sustainable for themselves. This distinction explains why some givers thrive while others falter despite similar generous intentions. Selfless givers typically say yes to every request, regardless of its importance or their capacity to help effectively. A study of engineers found that the lowest performers scored high on giving measures but reported being constantly interrupted by colleagues seeking assistance. Similarly, medical students with the lowest grades often spent excessive time tutoring peers at the expense of their own learning. These selfless givers failed to distinguish between high-value and low-value helping opportunities, spreading themselves too thin to make meaningful contributions or advance their own goals. Their indiscriminate approach to giving ultimately limited their impact on others while undermining their own success. Otherish givers, by contrast, maintain concern for others while also attending to their own objectives and well-being. They recognize that sustainable giving requires selectivity about when, how, and whom they help. Rather than responding to every request, they focus their generosity where it creates the greatest impact with the least personal cost. This might involve chunking helping behaviors into dedicated time periods rather than allowing constant interruptions, or developing expertise in specific types of assistance where they can add unique value. By giving more strategically, otherish givers actually create more value for others while preserving their ability to succeed personally. The timing of giving also significantly influences outcomes. Unsuccessful givers often help reactively, responding to requests as they arise regardless of their own priorities or deadlines. Successful givers more frequently engage in proactive giving—identifying opportunities to contribute that align with their schedules and strengths. This approach allows them to maintain productivity while still making meaningful contributions. Additionally, successful givers recognize when to seek help themselves, understanding that receiving assistance enables more effective giving in the future. Unlike selfless givers who view asking for help as imposing on others, otherish givers see it as creating opportunities for collaboration and mutual benefit. Perhaps most fundamentally, otherish givers differ from selfless givers in how they view the relationship between self-interest and other-interest. While selfless givers perceive these motivations as opposing forces, otherish givers recognize their potential complementarity. They seek ways to help others that simultaneously advance their own goals, creating positive-sum outcomes rather than zero-sum sacrifices. This integration of self and other concern allows them to maintain their giving values while achieving personal success, resolving the apparent contradiction between generosity and achievement. The distinction between selfless and otherish giving highlights a broader insight about success: the most effective approaches often involve integrating seemingly opposed values rather than choosing between them. By finding ways to serve others that also serve themselves, otherish givers transcend the false dichotomy between generosity and self-interest, creating sustainable patterns of contribution that benefit everyone involved.

Chapter 3: Building Networks Through Strategic Giving: The Power of Weak Ties

Network building represents one of the most significant domains where reciprocity styles shape professional outcomes. While conventional networking advice often emphasizes strategic relationship cultivation with influential individuals, givers approach networking with fundamentally different motivations and methods that yield surprising advantages. Their focus on creating value rather than extracting it generates distinctive network structures and dynamics that enhance both their impact and success. Givers excel at developing and activating what sociologists call "weak ties"—connections with acquaintances and colleagues outside their immediate circle. While strong ties with close colleagues provide emotional support and reliable assistance, weak ties offer unique advantages by connecting individuals to different social circles with novel information and opportunities. Research consistently shows that job opportunities, innovative ideas, and professional advancement more frequently come through these weak ties than through close relationships. Givers naturally develop extensive weak tie networks because their helpful interactions create positive impressions even in brief encounters, making others more likely to maintain connection and reciprocate in the future. Particularly valuable are "dormant ties"—relationships that were once strong but have fallen inactive over time. Studies reveal that reconnecting with dormant ties often provides more novel insights than current relationships because these individuals have developed different knowledge and perspectives during the period of disconnection. Givers find it easier to reactivate dormant ties because their previous interactions left positive impressions rather than transactional obligations. When a giver reaches out after years of silence, the dormant contact typically responds enthusiastically, remembering the giver's genuine helpfulness rather than calculating what they might want in return. The concept of "pronoia"—the opposite of paranoia, characterized by the belief that others are plotting your well-being—captures another network advantage that givers develop. Because givers help others without keeping score, matchers in their networks feel obligated to reciprocate, creating a web of allies actively looking for ways to support them. This phenomenon explains why givers often receive unexpected opportunities through seemingly random connections—these aren't actually random but reflect the activation of reciprocity norms among matchers who previously benefited from the giver's assistance. Givers also transform their networks through what entrepreneur Adam Rifkin calls "the five-minute favor"—small acts of assistance that require minimal time but create meaningful value. By consistently performing these small favors—making introductions, sharing information, providing feedback—givers establish norms of generosity that spread through their networks. Research demonstrates that giving behaviors are contagious, influencing people up to three degrees of separation. One consistent giver in a group can shift the entire culture toward greater collaboration and mutual support. The digital age has amplified these giver advantages by making reputations more transparent and interconnected. Online platforms reveal how people treat others, making it harder for takers to disguise self-serving behaviors and easier for givers to develop positive reputations that extend beyond their immediate circles. This transparency creates what some call "the small world effect," where giver reputations travel faster and wider than ever before, creating compounding returns on their relationship investments. In this environment, strategic giving becomes not just morally admirable but increasingly advantageous as a networking approach.

Chapter 4: Collaborative Intelligence: How Givers Enhance Team Performance

In collaborative environments, reciprocity styles dramatically influence both individual contributions and team outcomes. While takers often excel in independent work that rewards individual brilliance, givers thrive in interdependent contexts where success depends on coordinated effort. This distinction helps explain why givers consistently outperform in team settings despite sometimes sacrificing personal visibility. Givers approach collaboration with what mountaineers call "expedition behavior"—putting the group's goals and mission first while showing the same concern for others as for themselves. This manifests in three key behaviors that enhance team performance. First, givers take on thankless tasks that benefit the group but offer little personal recognition. They volunteer for unglamorous responsibilities that others avoid, freeing teammates to focus on their strengths while ensuring essential work gets done. This willingness to subordinate ego to group needs creates more efficient division of labor and prevents the coordination losses that occur when everyone pursues high-visibility tasks while neglecting foundational work. Second, givers share credit abundantly while accepting responsibility for setbacks. Research on attribution patterns shows that when teams succeed, givers highlight others' contributions; when teams fail, givers look first to their own shortcomings. This pattern builds psychological safety—the belief that one can take interpersonal risks without punishment—which research identifies as the strongest predictor of team innovation and learning. By creating environments where people feel safe to contribute ideas without fear of criticism, givers enable more creative collaboration and faster adaptation to challenges. Third, givers excel at perspective-taking during conflicts, seeing situations from multiple viewpoints rather than defending their positions. This skill proves particularly valuable when teams face disagreements about approaches or priorities. While takers and matchers often become entrenched in their perspectives, givers naturally consider others' interests, facilitating compromise and integration of diverse viewpoints into superior solutions. This capacity for perspective-taking enables teams to leverage their cognitive diversity rather than becoming paralyzed by it. Interestingly, these collaborative tendencies benefit not only teams but also the givers themselves. Through what psychologist Edwin Hollander called "idiosyncrasy credits," givers accumulate goodwill that grants them latitude to challenge conventions and propose radical ideas. Because teammates trust givers' intentions, they're more receptive to their suggestions, even when these ideas challenge established practices. This explains why givers often emerge as the most influential innovators in collaborative settings—their giving behaviors earn them the credibility to push boundaries and advocate for change. The collaborative advantage of giving becomes particularly pronounced in complex, interdependent work that characterizes many modern professional environments. Studies of surgical teams, software development groups, and professional services firms demonstrate that even supposedly individual performance depends heavily on collaborative relationships. As work becomes increasingly interconnected, the ability to enhance others' effectiveness through giving becomes not just admirable but strategically advantageous. This shift explains why givers who might have been disadvantaged in more individualistic contexts increasingly rise to the top in collaborative environments.

Chapter 5: Avoiding Exploitation: Setting Boundaries Without Compromising Values

The vulnerability of givers to exploitation represents one of the most significant challenges to sustainable generosity. Without appropriate boundaries, givers risk becoming doormats for takers who recognize and take advantage of their helpful tendencies. However, successful givers develop strategies that protect them from exploitation without requiring them to abandon their fundamental values or adopt taking behaviors themselves. Developing "sincerity screening" represents a crucial first step in avoiding exploitation. Successful givers learn to distinguish between genuine requests and manipulative ones by looking for subtle cues in behavior and communication. They pay attention to how people treat others, especially those in less powerful positions, and notice whether potential recipients show appreciation for help or simply move on to their next request. This discernment doesn't mean becoming cynical or suspicious, but rather developing a more nuanced understanding of human motivation. By identifying potential takers early, givers can adjust their approach accordingly, limiting their vulnerability while remaining generous with those who won't exploit them. The concept of "generous tit for tat" offers givers a powerful strategy for maintaining their giving orientation while protecting themselves from exploitation. Unlike traditional tit for tat, which responds to others' actions in kind, generous tit for tat begins with giving and maintains a slightly more generous stance throughout interactions. This approach allows givers to establish positive relationships while creating natural consequences for those who repeatedly take without reciprocating. By adjusting their level of giving based on others' responses, givers can maintain boundaries without abandoning their fundamental values. Successful givers also learn to distinguish between different types of requests, focusing their generosity where it creates the most value with the least personal cost. They recognize that not all helping opportunities are equal—some create substantial benefits for recipients while requiring minimal time or effort, while others demand significant resources with limited impact. By prioritizing high-impact, low-cost giving opportunities, givers can maintain their generous orientation while preserving their capacity to achieve their own goals. This selective approach doesn't diminish their giving; rather, it makes it more sustainable and effective. Perhaps most counterintuitively, successful givers become comfortable with appropriate assertiveness. Many givers struggle with advocating for themselves, fearing that doing so conflicts with their giving values. However, research shows that givers can be assertive without compromising their identity by reframing self-advocacy as serving a larger purpose. When givers view negotiation or boundary-setting as protecting their ability to help others effectively, they become more comfortable asserting their needs. This perspective shift allows them to maintain their giving orientation while ensuring they have the resources and energy to sustain their contributions. Creating systems and structures that support appropriate giving provides another layer of protection against exploitation. This might involve establishing clear guidelines about when and how much to give, scheduling specific times for helping others, or developing routines that ensure personal needs are met alongside giving activities. By creating these frameworks, givers can maintain their generosity while preventing it from consuming all their time and energy. These structures don't limit giving; rather, they make it more sustainable and effective by ensuring it occurs in appropriate contexts and amounts.

Chapter 6: Sustainable Giving: Preventing Burnout Through Strategic Generosity

The greatest risk for givers is burnout—the physical and emotional exhaustion that results from excessive giving without adequate replenishment. Selfless givers are particularly vulnerable to this condition, as they prioritize others' needs without establishing boundaries or practicing self-care. However, successful givers develop specific strategies that allow them to maintain generous behaviors while protecting their well-being. The first key distinction involves chunking rather than sprinkling giving behaviors. Research shows that consolidating giving into dedicated time periods produces greater happiness and less exhaustion than dispersing the same amount of giving throughout the day. When givers chunk their contributions—perhaps dedicating specific days to mentoring or particular hours to helping colleagues—they experience giving as a meaningful choice rather than a constant drain. This approach creates psychological boundaries that prevent giving from overwhelming other responsibilities and allows givers to fully engage in both helping and personal productivity without constant switching costs. Second, successful givers practice specialization, focusing their giving in areas where they can make unique contributions rather than responding to every request. By identifying their distinctive skills and interests, givers can help more effectively while expending less energy. This specialization allows them to experience what psychologists call "otherish" giving—contributions that simultaneously benefit others and themselves through the application of personal strengths and interests. When giving aligns with one's expertise and passions, it becomes energizing rather than depleting, creating a sustainable pattern that benefits both giver and recipient. Third, effective givers build support networks that enable sustainable giving. Rather than trying to help everyone personally, they connect people with others who might assist more effectively. This network approach multiplies their impact while distributing the burden of giving. It also creates reciprocity cycles where givers receive support when needed, preventing the depletion that comes from one-way giving relationships. By participating in communities where giving flows in multiple directions, successful givers ensure they're not the only ones contributing, creating sustainable ecosystems of mutual support. Fourth, successful givers recognize the importance of meaning as a psychological resource. Research demonstrates that when people view their work as a calling rather than just a job, they experience significantly less burnout despite often working longer hours. By focusing on the impact of their contributions rather than the effort required, givers transform potential exhaustion into energizing purpose. This meaning-focused approach doesn't eliminate the objective demands of giving but changes how givers experience those demands, making them less depleting and more fulfilling. Perhaps most counterintuitively, the solution to giver burnout sometimes involves more giving, not less—but giving differently. Studies show that when givers feel depleted by helping in one domain, helping in a different domain can actually restore energy rather than further depleting it. This phenomenon, called "prosocial switching," explains why many successful givers maintain multiple avenues for contribution rather than focusing exclusively on professional giving. By varying the types of giving they engage in, they create a more sustainable pattern that prevents any single form of giving from becoming exhausting. These strategies enable sustainable giving that benefits both recipients and givers themselves. By approaching generosity strategically rather than selflessly, successful givers create positive cycles where giving energizes rather than exhausts, allowing them to maintain their generous behaviors while achieving remarkable success.

Chapter 7: Creating Cultures of Contribution: Organizational Impact of Giving

Organizations that successfully cultivate giving cultures experience numerous benefits that extend beyond individual acts of generosity. When giving becomes the norm rather than the exception, information flows more freely, collaboration increases, and innovation flourishes. Employees in these environments are more likely to share knowledge, offer assistance, and contribute beyond their formal job requirements. This collective orientation toward helping creates organizational agility, as resources and expertise can be quickly mobilized to address emerging challenges or opportunities. Leadership plays a crucial role in establishing and maintaining giving cultures. Leaders who model generosity—who visibly help others, share credit, and prioritize collective success over personal recognition—set powerful examples that others tend to follow. Beyond their own behavior, effective leaders create systems and structures that support giving, such as collaborative work arrangements, recognition programs that highlight contributions to others, and evaluation criteria that value helping behaviors. They also protect giving cultures by addressing exploitative behavior that might otherwise discourage generosity. When leaders consistently reinforce the value of giving through both words and actions, they create environments where generosity becomes self-sustaining. Selection processes significantly influence organizational giving cultures. Companies that screen for giving tendencies during hiring—looking for evidence of helpfulness, collaboration, and concern for others' success—bring in people predisposed toward generosity. This selection approach creates a critical mass of givers who establish and reinforce norms of contribution. Importantly, hiring givers doesn't mean selecting for pure selflessness or ignoring technical competence. The most valuable organizational contributors combine giving orientations with strong skills and healthy boundaries—they're otherish rather than selfless givers, capable of contributing effectively while maintaining their own performance. The design of physical and virtual workspaces significantly influences giving behaviors within organizations. Spaces that facilitate interaction and visibility—open floor plans, common areas, digital platforms for sharing and collaboration—create more opportunities for giving and receiving help. When people can easily see what others are working on and communicate across traditional boundaries, spontaneous helping increases. Organizations that thoughtfully design their environments to promote these interactions foster more giving while still respecting needs for focus and privacy. The goal isn't constant interruption but rather appropriate visibility that enables timely and relevant assistance. Recognition systems that highlight and reward giving behaviors strengthen cultures of contribution. Traditional recognition often focuses on individual achievement, potentially undermining giving by emphasizing competition over collaboration. Organizations with strong giving cultures develop alternative approaches that celebrate contributions to others' success, team accomplishments, and behind-the-scenes support. These systems make giving more visible and valued, reinforcing its importance in the organizational culture and providing social rewards that motivate continued generosity. By publicly acknowledging acts of giving, organizations signal their commitment to collective success rather than just individual performance. Perhaps most importantly, organizations with strong giving cultures develop mechanisms for protecting givers from exploitation and burnout. They establish norms that discourage taking behaviors, create systems for distributing helping responsibilities fairly, and ensure that givers receive the support they need. Leaders in these organizations watch for signs of burnout among generous employees and intervene when necessary, helping them establish appropriate boundaries. By making giving sustainable rather than depleting, these practices enable cultures of contribution to thrive over the long term rather than burning brightly and then fading as givers become exhausted or disillusioned.

Summary

The paradox of giving reveals a profound insight about success in contemporary professional environments: generosity can be either a liability or a powerful advantage, depending on how it's practiced. The critical distinction lies not in whether one gives but in how one gives. Successful givers maintain their generous orientation while developing strategies that protect them from exploitation and burnout. They give in ways that are both high in impact for recipients and sustainable for themselves, creating value for others while advancing their own goals. This otherish approach to giving resolves the apparent contradiction between generosity and achievement, demonstrating that these values can reinforce rather than oppose each other. The implications of this insight extend beyond individual success to organizational and societal functioning. As work becomes increasingly collaborative and interdependent, the ability to enhance others' effectiveness through giving becomes not just morally admirable but strategically advantageous. Organizations that cultivate cultures of contribution—where giving is expected, protected, and celebrated—develop significant advantages in innovation, adaptability, and talent development. By understanding the mechanics of effective giving and creating conditions that support it, we can build environments where success comes not from claiming value at others' expense but from creating value that benefits everyone involved. This perspective offers a more integrated view of achievement, one where contributing to others becomes a pathway to success rather than an obstacle to it.

About Author

Loading...

Adam M. Grant

Read more

Related Books by Adam M. Grant

Loading...

Think Again

Adam M. Grant

The Power of Knowing What You Don't Know

★★★★½4.6

Loading...

Hidden Potential

Adam M. Grant

The Science of Achieving Greater Things

★★★★½4.5

Loading...

Originals

Adam M. Grant

How Non-Conformists Move the World

★★★★☆4.3