Affluenza

Affluenza Plot Summary

Introduction

In the early 1950s, a typical American family lived in a 950-square-foot home, owned one car, and rarely ate at restaurants. Fast forward to today, where the average new home exceeds 2,500 square feet, families own multiple vehicles, and restaurant spending surpasses grocery budgets. This dramatic transformation represents more than just economic growth—it embodies a profound shift in American values and identity, a phenomenon that has reshaped not only our economy but our very definition of happiness and success. This exploration traces how a nation founded on ideals of thrift and moderation transformed into the global epicenter of consumption. Through examining the historical roots of our spending habits, the psychological tactics used to stimulate desire, and the environmental and social consequences of our consumption patterns, readers will gain insight into one of the most powerful forces shaping modern life. Whether you're concerned about personal debt, environmental sustainability, or simply curious about the forces driving our "more is better" culture, understanding the rise and potential decline of American consumer culture provides essential context for navigating today's complex economic landscape.

Chapter 1: Seeds of Desire: The Birth of Consumer Culture (1920-1950s)

The seeds of modern American consumerism were planted in the fertile economic soil of the 1920s, when mass production techniques pioneered by Henry Ford and others made consumer goods more affordable and available than ever before. This period marked the first time ordinary Americans could purchase automobiles, radios, and household appliances—items previously reserved for the wealthy elite. The decade witnessed the birth of modern advertising, with agencies like J. Walter Thompson developing sophisticated psychological techniques to create desire rather than simply announce product availability. This emerging consumer culture faced its first major challenge during the Great Depression of the 1930s. As unemployment reached 25% and many Americans struggled for basic necessities, the values of thrift and frugality temporarily reasserted themselves. Government programs under the New Deal emphasized conservation and resource management rather than consumption. Yet even during these difficult years, businesses and policymakers began to recognize that consumer spending would be essential to future economic recovery. World War II transformed the American economy and laid groundwork for postwar consumerism. Manufacturing capacity expanded dramatically to meet military needs, and Americans saved at unprecedented rates due to both patriotic duty and limited consumer options. By 1945, Americans had accumulated nearly $140 billion in savings (equivalent to over $2 trillion today) and were eager to spend after years of wartime rationing and sacrifice. Manufacturers rapidly converted from military production to consumer goods, creating everything from refrigerators to suburban homes. The immediate postwar period witnessed the birth of modern consumer culture as we know it. The GI Bill enabled millions of veterans to purchase homes in newly developed suburbs like Levittown, while the Interstate Highway System connected these communities and facilitated automobile-dependent lifestyles. Television entered American homes, bringing advertising directly into living rooms and showcasing idealized middle-class lifestyles. As economist John Kenneth Galbraith noted in his 1958 book "The Affluent Society," America had created "an economy geared to the production of an ever-increasing supply of goods." This fundamental shift would reshape not just the economy, but American identity itself in the decades to come.

Chapter 2: The Golden Age: Post-War Boom and Identity Formation

The period from 1945 to the early 1970s represents the golden age of American consumerism, characterized by unprecedented economic growth and rising living standards across all social classes. Real wages grew steadily, allowing middle-class families to purchase homes, automobiles, and an expanding array of consumer goods. Homeownership rates increased from 44% in 1940 to nearly 65% by 1970, fundamentally altering Americans' relationship with debt and assets. This era saw the birth of the credit card, which would gradually transform spending habits by separating the act of purchase from payment. Suburban development exploded during this period, with housing starts reaching 2 million annually in the 1950s. These new communities were designed around consumption—from shopping centers to picture windows displaying new furniture and appliances. The suburban lifestyle required not just homes but entire constellations of consumer goods: lawn mowers, barbecue grills, televisions, and increasingly, multiple cars per household. Department stores and shopping malls became the new town squares, places where Americans not only purchased goods but also formed social connections and expressed their identities. Television emerged as the dominant cultural force, with ownership increasing from just 9% of American households in 1950 to over 95% by 1970. TV programming and advertising presented idealized visions of middle-class life centered around consumer goods, while also homogenizing consumer desires across regional and class lines. As one advertising executive noted, "Television created a nationwide showroom in every American home." The medium's influence was so profound that by the 1960s, Americans were forming their expectations about normal living standards more from television portrayals than from their actual neighbors. Perhaps most significantly, this period saw consumption become inextricably linked with American identity. Purchasing power became equated with freedom and democracy, particularly in contrast to Soviet communism during the Cold War. As historian Lizabeth Cohen has documented, being a good consumer became synonymous with being a good citizen. This was exemplified in the famous 1959 "Kitchen Debate" between Vice President Nixon and Soviet Premier Khrushchev, where Nixon pointed to American household appliances as evidence of capitalist superiority. The message was clear: America's strength lay not just in its military might but in its unparalleled ability to produce and consume goods that improved everyday life.

Chapter 3: Engineering Demand: How Marketing Created Insatiable Appetites

The transformation of American consumption patterns required more than just increased production capacity—it demanded a revolution in marketing techniques to stimulate demand. Between the 1950s and 1980s, advertising evolved from simply informing consumers about product features to creating psychological associations between products and deeper human desires. Motivational researcher Ernest Dichter pioneered techniques that linked everyday products to unconscious needs for status, security, and sexual fulfillment. His research for clients like Chrysler and Procter & Gamble revealed how products could be positioned to address emotional rather than functional needs. Television advertising became increasingly sophisticated during this period, with annual spending growing from $170 million in 1950 to over $21 billion by 1990. The average American's exposure to advertisements increased from about 500 per day in the 1970s to several thousand by the 1990s. Children became primary marketing targets, with the average child viewing more than 20,000 commercials annually by the 1980s. Studies showed that children could recognize brand logos before they could read, and increasingly influenced family purchasing decisions worth billions of dollars. The concept of "planned obsolescence" became central to maintaining consumer demand. Manufacturers deliberately designed products to become outdated through either physical deterioration or stylistic changes. The automotive industry pioneered this approach with annual model changes that made perfectly functional vehicles seem outdated. Fashion cycles accelerated, with clothing styles changing not just seasonally but multiple times per year. Electronics companies introduced new features that rendered previous models obsolete, creating a perpetual upgrade cycle that continues to this day. Marketing strategies increasingly targeted specific demographic groups, fragmenting the mass market into specialized consumer segments. Baby boomers, with their unprecedented purchasing power, became the most analyzed and targeted generation in history. As they moved through life stages, entire industries expanded to meet their needs—from toys and education in the 1950s and 1960s to housing and financial services in the 1970s and 1980s. The development of sophisticated market research techniques allowed advertisers to craft increasingly personalized appeals that made resistance to consumption more difficult. As advertising executive Victor Lebow candidly admitted in 1955, "Our enormously productive economy demands that we make consumption our way of life, that we convert the buying and use of goods into rituals, that we seek our spiritual satisfaction in consumption."

Chapter 4: The Hidden Costs: Environmental and Social Consequences

The environmental consequences of America's consumer culture began receiving serious attention in the 1960s and 1970s, catalyzed by works like Rachel Carson's "Silent Spring" and the first Earth Day celebration in 1970. The postwar economic boom had been fueled by unprecedented resource extraction and energy consumption, with Americans using more raw materials per capita than any society in human history. By 1970, with just 6% of the world's population, the United States was consuming roughly 30% of global resources and generating a similar proportion of waste and pollution. The suburban lifestyle central to American consumption patterns proved particularly resource-intensive. Low-density housing developments consumed farmland and natural habitats at alarming rates, with over 1.5 million acres of land being developed annually by the 1990s. Automobile-dependent communities required massive infrastructure investments and generated air pollution, with transportation accounting for roughly one-third of U.S. carbon emissions. The average American's daily commute doubled between 1960 and 2000, increasing both fossil fuel consumption and stress levels. The social fabric of American communities began showing signs of strain as consumption-centered lifestyles took hold. Membership in civic organizations like Rotary Clubs, parent-teacher associations, and religious congregations fell by roughly 25-50% from the 1950s through the 1990s. Political scientist Robert Putnam documented this trend in his work "Bowling Alone," noting that Americans were increasingly "bowling alone" rather than in leagues and other social groups that had previously bound communities together. Shopping centers and malls replaced town squares and Main Streets as gathering places, transforming citizens into consumers in the process. Family life underwent equally dramatic transformations as consumption pressures intensified. Between 1970 and 2000, the average American workweek increased by roughly 160 hours annually—equivalent to an additional month of work each year. Two-income households became the norm not by choice but by economic necessity, as maintaining middle-class consumption standards increasingly required two full-time salaries. Family dinners declined from being a daily occurrence in most households to happening just three times weekly in the average family by the 1990s. Children's unstructured play time decreased significantly, while time spent shopping with parents increased. As sociologist Juliet Schor observed, "The new consumerism has transformed childhood into an extended shopping opportunity," with troubling consequences for both individual development and social cohesion.

Chapter 5: Resistance and Alternatives: Movements for Sustainable Living

The excesses of consumer culture have consistently inspired countermovements advocating simpler, more sustainable lifestyles. The 1960s and early 1970s saw the emergence of the first major postwar simplicity movement, with thousands of young Americans establishing rural communes and urban cooperatives that rejected mainstream consumption patterns. Publications like the "Whole Earth Catalog" provided practical tools for self-sufficient living, while E.F. Schumacher's "Small Is Beautiful" offered an intellectual framework for human-scale economics. Though this movement fragmented by the late 1970s, it planted seeds that would later flourish. A more mainstream voluntary simplicity movement emerged in the 1990s, inspired by books like Duane Elgin's "Voluntary Simplicity" and Joe Dominguez and Vicki Robin's "Your Money or Your Life." This movement attracted professionals who had achieved conventional success but found it unsatisfying. Organizations like the Center for a New American Dream helped people reduce consumption while increasing quality of life. Unlike earlier back-to-the-land movements, this approach emphasized finding balance within mainstream society—working less, consuming mindfully, and redirecting energy toward relationships and community. The environmental movement increasingly focused on consumption issues, recognizing that individual lifestyle choices had significant ecological impacts. Concepts like "ecological footprint" provided metrics for understanding consumption impacts, while "collaborative consumption" models offered alternatives to individual ownership. Car-sharing services, tool libraries, and community gardens demonstrated how people could access goods without necessarily owning them. The "tiny house" movement, which gained momentum in the 2000s, challenged conventional housing standards by promoting homes under 400 square feet. Digital technology created both challenges and opportunities for anti-consumerist movements. While online shopping and social media advertising intensified consumption pressures, the internet also connected like-minded individuals seeking alternatives. Online communities shared practical skills for reducing consumption, from gardening and home repair to negotiating reduced work hours. Local currencies, time banks, and barter networks created exchange systems outside the conventional economy. The 2008 financial crisis accelerated interest in these alternatives, as economic insecurity prompted many Americans to question debt-dependent lifestyles. As writer Charles Eisenstein observed, "The old story of more, more, more is giving way to a new story about quality rather than quantity, relationship rather than consumption, meaning rather than material."

Chapter 6: Inflection Point: Rethinking Prosperity in a Finite World

The early 21st century has brought mounting evidence that the American consumption model faces fundamental constraints. Climate change, resource depletion, and ecosystem collapse have made the environmental limits of mass consumption increasingly apparent. Scientists calculate that if all humans consumed resources at American levels, we would need between four and five Earth-sized planets to sustain ourselves. This stark reality has prompted growing recognition that prosperity must be redefined in ways that respect planetary boundaries. Economic indicators suggest the consumption-driven growth model is showing signs of strain even on its own terms. Income inequality has reached levels not seen since the 1920s, with the top 1% of Americans holding more wealth than the bottom 90% combined. This concentration of economic power has undermined the broad-based prosperity that fueled the postwar consumer boom. Meanwhile, studies consistently show that beyond a certain threshold, increased consumption fails to improve well-being. Despite a doubling of per capita consumption between 1957 and 2002, the percentage of Americans describing themselves as "very happy" remained virtually unchanged. Younger generations appear to be pioneering new relationships with consumption. Millennials and Generation Z show greater interest in experiences over possessions, access over ownership, and sustainability over status consumption. Studies indicate they are less likely than previous generations to equate success with material acquisition. The sharing economy, minimalism, and "buy less, buy better" movements reflect these shifting values. As one 28-year-old put it in a widely-shared essay: "I don't want to work 80 hours a week to pay for a lifestyle I'm too busy to enjoy." The COVID-19 pandemic accelerated many of these trends, forcing a collective reassessment of priorities. Supply chain disruptions revealed the fragility of global consumption systems, while lockdowns prompted many to distinguish between essential and non-essential purchases. Remote work arrangements demonstrated that alternatives to commute-heavy, consumption-intensive lifestyles were possible. A significant percentage of workers indicated they would accept lower pay for greater flexibility and time affluence, suggesting a potential shift in the work-spend equation that has dominated for decades. Business models are evolving in response to these changing conditions. Companies like Patagonia have pioneered "anti-consumption" approaches that encourage repair and reuse rather than replacement. The B Corporation movement has grown rapidly, with over 3,500 companies committing to balance profit with social and environmental impact. Investment in circular economy initiatives—which design out waste and keep materials in use—increased from virtually nothing in 2010 to over $1.3 trillion by 2020. These developments suggest the possibility of economic systems that deliver well-being without requiring ever-increasing material throughput. As we navigate this inflection point, the fundamental question becomes not whether change will occur, but whether it will happen by design or disaster. The consumption patterns that defined American prosperity in the 20th century cannot continue indefinitely in a world of 8 billion people and finite resources. The challenge ahead lies in creating systems that provide sufficiency for all while respecting planetary boundaries—a transformation that will require not just technological innovation but cultural innovation in how we define and pursue the good life.

Summary

Throughout American history, we've witnessed a fundamental tension between two competing visions of prosperity. The first, embodied in consumer culture, equates well-being with material acquisition and defines freedom as unlimited choice in the marketplace. The second, represented by various simplicity movements, locates prosperity in relationships, community, and balance with natural systems. This tension has defined much of our national experience, with the consumerist vision dominating particularly since World War II. Yet as environmental limits become increasingly apparent and psychological research reveals the limitations of material pursuits, we appear to be approaching an inflection point where alternative models may gain greater traction. The lessons of this historical journey offer valuable guidance for navigating our current challenges. First, we must recognize that consumption habits are not merely personal choices but are shaped by powerful institutional forces—from advertising and easy credit to urban design and tax policies. Second, true prosperity requires balancing material sufficiency with non-material sources of fulfillment like community, creativity, and connection to nature. Finally, sustainability demands not just technological innovation but cultural innovation—new stories about what constitutes the good life and how much is enough. By understanding the historical forces that shaped our consumer culture, we gain the perspective needed to imagine and create more fulfilling and sustainable ways of living.

About Author

Loading...

John De Graaf

Read more