Capitalism

Capitalism Plot Summary

Introduction

In April 1601, four ships belonging to the English East India Company set sail for the East Indies. After a perilous journey lasting 18 months, they returned with holds full of pepper from Sumatra and Java. The shareholders in this venture made a profit of 95% on their investment. This remarkable story marks one of the earliest episodes in the grand narrative of capitalism - a system that would eventually transform human society more profoundly than perhaps any other economic arrangement in history. Capitalism is often misunderstood as simply "business" or "making money," but its true nature is far more complex and fascinating. Through the centuries, it has evolved from merchant traders risking their fortunes on distant voyages, to industrialists organizing factories and disciplining labor, to financial speculators trading in complex derivatives across digital networks. This historical journey reveals capitalism as a dynamic, adaptable system that has repeatedly transformed itself in response to crises and opportunities. By examining how capitalism emerged, evolved, and spread globally, we gain crucial insights into the economic forces that continue to shape our world today, including inequality, globalization, financial instability, and the relationship between states and markets.

Chapter 1: Merchant Capitalism: Origins and Early Trading Systems (1600-1800)

Merchant capitalism emerged as the earliest recognizable form of capitalist activity, flourishing particularly between 1600 and 1800. This period saw European powers establishing trading companies to exploit opportunities in distant markets. Organizations like the English and Dutch East India Companies exemplify this era, when profit was derived primarily from the difference between the price of goods in their place of origin and their value in European markets. These early trading ventures required significant capital investment. Ships needed to be built, fitted with cannon, crewed, and stocked with trade goods or bullion. The risks were enormous - vessels could be lost at sea, crews decimated by disease, or markets could suddenly collapse when too many competitors arrived with similar goods. The potential profits, however, were equally substantial. When the English East India Company's first expedition returned from the East Indies, investors earned a remarkable 95% return on their capital. The financing of these ventures drove important innovations in business organization. While initial voyages were funded separately with profits distributed after each return, companies eventually developed continuous investment models that spread risk across multiple expeditions. By 1688, shares in the English East India Company were being traded on the London Stock Exchange. This development of joint-stock companies with transferable shares represents one of merchant capitalism's most enduring contributions to modern economic systems. Crucially, this early form of capitalism was not based on free markets but on monopoly and privilege. Trading companies received exclusive rights from their home governments to trade in specific regions. They maintained high profits by controlling supply, manipulating markets, and forcibly excluding competitors. The English East India Company, for instance, was granted legal powers to take action against "interlopers" who threatened its monopoly. This partnership between state power and commercial enterprise would remain a defining feature of capitalism through subsequent eras. While merchant capitalism generated enormous wealth for investors and helped fund state activities through customs duties, its impact on broader society remained limited. Most people continued their traditional work largely unaffected by these distant trading networks. The transformation of everyday life would come only with the next phase of capitalist development, when capital began to reorganize production itself rather than merely facilitating trade.

Chapter 2: Industrial Revolution: The Birth of Factory Production (1800-1900)

The 19th century witnessed capitalism's most dramatic transformation as it shifted from merchant trading to industrial production. This era saw capital directly invested in manufacturing processes, revolutionizing how goods were produced and fundamentally altering the relationship between owners and workers. The cotton industry in Britain exemplifies this transition, with firms like James M'Connel and John Kennedy's cotton spinning enterprise in Manchester achieving returns of over 30% in the early 1800s through factory production. The factory system introduced unprecedented discipline and control over labor. Workers faced strictly regulated hours, continuous work patterns, and close supervision. Factory owners implemented various methods to enforce this new discipline, from corporal punishment and fines to more sophisticated systems like Robert Owen's "silent monitors" at New Lanark - colored blocks displaying each worker's performance quality. Time itself became a battleground, with employers installing clocks and forbidding workers from owning watches to maintain control over the workday. This transformation was so profound that E.P. Thompson characterized it as a fundamental reordering of human time consciousness. Competition drove rapid technological change and industry expansion. The high profits of early industrialists attracted new entrants, with cotton mills in Britain increasing from 344 in 1819 to 1,815 by 1839. This competition pushed manufacturers to invest in ever more efficient machinery, with newer mills containing 40,000 spindles compared to the 4,500 of earlier facilities. This constant pressure to improve productivity and reduce costs became a defining feature of industrial capitalism, generating unprecedented economic growth but also periodic crises of overproduction. Labor resistance emerged as workers organized to protect themselves against exploitation. Craft workers formed "combinations" (early unions) to establish minimum wages and prevent employers from hiring non-members. In the cotton industry, spinners organized increasingly sophisticated strikes in 1810, 1818, and 1830, though these were typically defeated through coordinated employer action and state intervention. This adversarial relationship between capital and labor would become another enduring characteristic of industrial capitalism. Industrial capitalism's transformation extended beyond work to reshape leisure as well. By creating bounded work time and expelling non-work activities from the workplace, industrialization paradoxically created "leisure" as a distinct category of life. Workers began paying for organized leisure activities provided by capitalist enterprises - excursions by rail, spectator sports, and other commercial entertainments. This commercialization of leisure created entirely new industries and markets, generating further demand for industrial products and establishing consumption patterns that remain familiar today.

Chapter 3: Financial Capitalism: The Rise of Global Money Markets

As industrial capitalism matured, a new form emerged centered on financial operations rather than physical production. Financial capitalism developed around the sophisticated management of money, credit, and investment through increasingly complex instruments and institutions. Banks, stock exchanges, and specialized financial firms gained unprecedented influence over economic activity, often directing industrial development itself. The story of Nick Leeson and Barings Bank vividly illustrates both the sophistication and dangers of modern financial capitalism. In 1995, Leeson, a derivatives trader at Barings' Singapore office, accumulated losses of over £600 million through unauthorized speculative trading, causing the collapse of Britain's oldest merchant bank. Leeson traded in "derivatives" - financial instruments deriving their value from underlying assets like shares, bonds, or commodities. While derivatives originally served to reduce risk by allowing producers to lock in future prices, they increasingly became vehicles for pure speculation - what economist Susan Strange aptly termed "casino capitalism." The expansion of international finance was facilitated by technological innovation. The development of instantaneous global communications, computerized trading systems, and electronic money transfers enabled capital to move across borders with unprecedented speed and volume. By the late 20th century, currency trading alone had reached $1.5 trillion daily, dwarfing the volume of trade in physical goods. This created a financial system increasingly detached from productive activity, where profits could be generated through sophisticated arbitrage or speculation rather than manufacturing or service provision. Deregulation of financial markets significantly accelerated this transformation. The dismantling of Depression-era banking regulations, the abolition of capital controls, and the "Big Bang" deregulation of London's financial markets in 1987 created new opportunities for financial innovation and speculation. These changes were driven partly by competition between financial centers like New York, London, and emerging Asian hubs, each seeking to attract mobile global capital. The relationship between financial and industrial capitalism became increasingly complex. On one hand, sophisticated financial markets provided crucial capital for industrial development. On the other, they often prioritized short-term financial returns over long-term productive investment. This tension would become particularly evident during financial crises, when the collapse of speculative bubbles disrupted funding for productive enterprise and revealed the interdependence of financial and industrial sectors within modern capitalism.

Chapter 4: Managed Capitalism: State Intervention and Class Organization (1945-1970s)

The period from 1945 to the 1970s marked a distinctive phase in capitalism's evolution, characterized by unprecedented state intervention, strong class organization, and an explicit commitment to managing economic outcomes. This "managed capitalism" emerged partly in response to the catastrophic failure of market self-regulation during the Great Depression and was reinforced by the collective experience of wartime economic planning. The postwar economic order featured several interconnected elements. Governments actively managed their economies through Keynesian demand management, using public spending and taxation to maintain full employment. Labor movements gained significant power, with union membership reaching historic highs in most advanced economies. In Britain, governments pursued policies of corporatism, bringing representatives of labor, business, and the state together to negotiate economic policy. This era also saw the construction of comprehensive welfare states, with countries like Britain establishing national health services, public housing programs, and expanded education systems. Class organization reached its peak during this period. Employers formed powerful associations to represent their collective interests, while workers achieved unprecedented levels of unionization. In Sweden, extraordinarily high levels of worker organization (reaching over 80% of the workforce) enabled a particularly coherent form of managed capitalism, with centralized wage bargaining and a strong Social Democratic government pursuing egalitarian policies. The result was a compression of wage differentials and a substantial redistribution of income through progressive taxation. The nationalization of key industries was another prominent feature of managed capitalism. In Britain, coal mining, railways, steel production, and utilities were brought under public ownership, removing them from market competition. This was not always motivated by socialist ideology but often by nationalist concerns about efficiency and control of strategic sectors. Even in the United States, less inclined toward public ownership, the government significantly shaped the economy through defense spending, regulation, and the development of what President Eisenhower called the "military-industrial complex." Managed capitalism delivered remarkable results for several decades. The period from 1945 to 1973 saw unprecedented economic growth in advanced economies, rising real wages, decreasing inequality, and significant improvements in living standards for working-class people. However, by the early 1970s, this model faced mounting challenges. Rising inflation, declining productivity growth, intensified international competition, and increasing labor militancy strained the system's capacity to deliver continued prosperity. The oil price shocks of 1973 and 1979 accelerated these problems, setting the stage for a fundamental reevaluation of capitalism's organization in the decades that followed.

Chapter 5: Remarketized Capitalism: Neo-liberalism and Global Competition (1980s-Present)

The 1980s witnessed a dramatic transformation of capitalism as the structures of the postwar order were dismantled and replaced with market-oriented arrangements. This process, often termed "remarketization," was exemplified by the policies of Margaret Thatcher in Britain and Ronald Reagan in the United States. It represented not merely a policy shift but a fundamental reconceptualization of capitalism's proper organization and the appropriate relationship between states, markets, and civil society. Neo-liberal ideas provided the intellectual foundation for this transformation. Rejecting Keynesian demand management and corporatist arrangements, neo-liberals advocated free markets, minimal state intervention, and individual responsibility. Friedrich Hayek and Milton Friedman, once marginal figures in economic thought, became influential advisors to governments. Their ideas stressed that inflation, not unemployment, should be the primary concern of economic policy, and that market competition, not state planning, would deliver efficiency and growth. Privatization became a central strategy of remarketized capitalism. Between 1979 and 1992, the British government sold two-thirds of state-owned industries, including telecommunications, gas, electricity, water, steel, and airways. Council housing was sold to tenants, and public services from healthcare to prisons saw the introduction of market mechanisms through "internal markets" and "compulsory competitive tendering." This pattern was repeated across the developed world and imposed on developing countries through structural adjustment programs administered by the International Monetary Fund and World Bank. Labor market deregulation fundamentally altered the balance of power between capital and labor. Trade union power was systematically weakened through restrictive legislation, confrontational industrial disputes (like the 1984-85 miners' strike in Britain), and economic policies that tolerated high unemployment. These changes facilitated more flexible employment practices, including part-time work, temporary contracts, and outsourcing. Real wages stagnated or declined for many workers while executive compensation increased dramatically, reversing the compression of income differentials achieved during the era of managed capitalism. Financial deregulation created a more internationally integrated but also more volatile capitalism. The removal of capital controls, financial market liberalization, and the development of new financial instruments facilitated massive increases in international capital flows. While this enhanced efficiency in some respects, it also increased economic volatility and made countries more vulnerable to financial crises, as demonstrated by the Asian financial crisis of 1997-98 and the global financial crisis of 2008. A growing disconnect between financial markets and productive activity emerged, with financial profits increasingly derived from speculation rather than investment in productive capacity. By the early 21st century, remarketized capitalism had created societies characterized by greater choice and individual freedom but also by increased insecurity, higher inequality, and intensified work pressures. While some prospered in this new environment, others experienced declining living standards and reduced social mobility. The 2008 financial crisis exposed the system's vulnerabilities but did not fundamentally alter its trajectory, leaving open questions about capitalism's next transformation.

Chapter 6: Global Expansion: Capitalism's Worldwide Reach and Impact

The late 20th and early 21st centuries witnessed capitalism's unprecedented global expansion, as market relations penetrated regions and domains previously organized along different principles. This expansion was not simply a geographical extension of existing capitalist relations but involved the creation of new global production networks, financial flows, and consumption patterns that transformed societies worldwide. Manufacturing became increasingly globalized through the operations of transnational corporations. Between 1973 and 1993, the number of transnational corporations increased from 7,000 to 26,000, with their foreign investment accelerating dramatically after 1985. The maquiladora industry along Mexico's border with the United States exemplifies this trend. Starting in 1965 when Mexico allowed duty-free import of materials for re-export, thousands of manufacturing plants were established employing cheap, predominantly female labor in electronics, vehicle production, and textiles. Similar processes occurred in Asia, where Japanese capital first moved to the "tiger economies" of Hong Kong, Taiwan, Singapore, and South Korea, then to lower-cost locations like Indonesia, Malaysia, and Thailand, and eventually to China and Vietnam. The globalization of services followed manufacturing. Advances in information technology enabled office work - from data processing to customer service - to be relocated to lower-cost locations. Call centers emerged as major employers in places like India, where workers trained in Western pronunciation and conversation handled customer inquiries for companies based in Europe and North America. Software development became concentrated in centers like Bangalore, where companies like IBM, Motorola, and Hewlett Packard established operations utilizing India's highly educated, English-speaking workforce at a fraction of Western salary costs. Financial globalization created unprecedented flows of money across borders. By the late 20th century, daily trading in foreign currencies reached $1.5 trillion, a sum greater than the annual GDP of many nations. This expansion was facilitated by technological advances in communications, the development of sophisticated financial instruments, and the deregulation of financial markets. While this allowed capital to flow more efficiently toward productive opportunities, it also created new vulnerabilities, as demonstrated by currency crises in Mexico (1994), East Asia (1997), Russia (1998), and Argentina (2001). The environmental and social consequences of capitalism's global expansion proved deeply contradictory. On one hand, it lifted hundreds of millions of people out of poverty, particularly in China and parts of Southeast Asia, and created new economic opportunities in previously marginalized regions. On the other hand, it generated growing inequality both within and between nations, environmentally unsustainable production patterns, and the commodification of nature itself. Seeds, water, genetic material, and indigenous knowledge - once freely available as common resources - increasingly became privatized commodities controlled by multinational corporations. Despite talk of "global capitalism," significant limitations remained to capitalism's global integration. Foreign investment concentrated in a small number of developing countries, with China receiving approximately one-third of all investment in developing countries during the 1990s. The entire continent of Africa (excluding South Africa) received less than 1% of global foreign direct investment in 2000. Furthermore, financial flows remained predominantly circulated among wealthy economies, with emerging markets accounting for only 7% of the world's capital despite containing 85% of the world's population. Thus, capitalism's global expansion paradoxically widened rather than narrowed international disparities.

Chapter 7: Crisis and Resilience: Capitalism's Recurring Challenges

Throughout its history, capitalism has been characterized by periodic crises that threaten its stability but ultimately lead to its transformation and renewal. These episodes reveal fundamental tensions within capitalist economies while also demonstrating the system's remarkable capacity for adaptation and survival. Crisis has been a recurrent feature of capitalism since its earliest days. The "tulipomania" that gripped 17th-century Holland provides an instructive early example. As tulip prices rose rapidly in the 1630s, a speculative market in tulip futures developed, drawing in ordinary people from weavers to carpenters. When prices eventually collapsed, many investors lost everything. This episode displayed patterns that would recur in countless later speculative bubbles - easy credit, separation of price from underlying value, widespread participation beyond financial elites, and eventual collapse when confidence evaporated. The 19th century saw the emergence of more systematic crisis tendencies as industrial capitalism developed. Karl Marx identified overproduction as a fundamental problem - the tendency for competitive pressures to drive expansion of productive capacity beyond what markets could absorb. This generated periodic downturns as prices fell below profitable levels, forcing factory closures and creating unemployment. These crises occurred roughly every ten years during the first half of the 19th century, though the system always eventually recovered as excess capacity was eliminated and profitability restored. The Great Depression of the 1930s represented capitalism's most severe crisis. Following the 1929 Wall Street crash, industrial production in the United States fell by one-third, and unemployment reached 25% of the workforce. The crisis spread globally through interconnected trade and financial systems, devastating both industrial economies and primary producers. This catastrophic failure prompted fundamental reconsideration of capitalism's organization, leading to the Keynesian policies and managed capitalism of the post-war era. The 1970s brought a different kind of crisis as the postwar economic order unraveled. Unlike the deflationary crisis of the 1930s, this period featured "stagflation" - the previously unthinkable combination of high inflation and high unemployment. Oil price shocks, declining productivity growth, intensified international competition, and labor militancy combined to squeeze profits and undermine the Keynesian consensus. This crisis ultimately led to the remarketization of capitalism described earlier. The period since the 1980s has featured more frequent but geographically limited crises. Financial liberalization and globalization created new vulnerabilities, as demonstrated by the savings and loan crisis in the United States (1980s), the Japanese asset price collapse (early 1990s), the Mexican peso crisis (1994), the Asian financial crisis (1997-98), the dot-com bubble (2000), and most dramatically, the global financial crisis of 2008. Each episode revealed different aspects of capitalism's instability while demonstrating its capacity to survive even severe disruptions. Despite recurring crises, capitalism has shown remarkable resilience. After each major crisis, the system has reorganized itself - shifting from merchant to industrial forms, from laissez-faire to managed variants, from national to global arrangements. This adaptability partly explains why predictions of capitalism's demise have repeatedly proven premature. However, contemporary challenges - including climate change, resource depletion, and growing inequality - may test capitalism's adaptive capacity in unprecedented ways, potentially requiring transformations as profound as any in its history.

Summary

Throughout its long evolution, capitalism has demonstrated a remarkable capacity for transformation while maintaining certain core dynamics. From its merchant origins through industrial, financial, managed, and remarketized phases, capitalism has consistently generated both unprecedented wealth creation and profound social disruption. Its fundamental mechanisms - private ownership, market competition, wage labor, and profit maximization - have expanded into new geographical territories and previously non-commercial domains, reshaping societies and natural environments in the process. Yet this expansion has been neither uniform nor universal, creating instead a complex global mosaic of interconnected but distinctly organized capitalisms adapted to different cultural, institutional, and political contexts. The historical journey of capitalism offers crucial insights for navigating contemporary economic challenges. First, we must recognize that different organizations of capitalism are possible - there is no single "natural" or inevitable form that markets must take. The diversity of successful capitalist arrangements, from Nordic social democracy to East Asian developmental states, demonstrates that societies retain significant choice in how they structure economic relationships. Second, markets require active management and regulation to function effectively and avoid destructive crises. The illusion of self-regulating markets has repeatedly led to catastrophic failures that undermine capitalism's own foundations. Finally, capitalism's remarkable productive capacity must be harnessed to address, rather than exacerbate, pressing global challenges like inequality and environmental degradation. History suggests that capitalism will continue to evolve, but the direction of that evolution remains very much within our collective power to influence.

About Author

Loading...

James Fulcher

My main interest has been in the comparative study of the development of societies. I first carried out a comparative study of the changing relationships between employers, unions, and the state in Britain and Sweden, from the nineteenth century onwards. I then became particularly interested in the distinctive features of Japanese society and the intriguing question of how the Japanese were able to beat the West at its own game by avoiding colonial domination, creating their own empire, and becoming first a military and then an economic superpower. Interest in these societies was linked to a broader concern with the development of capitalism, its stages of development, globalization, and different institutional forms. I have also been writing (with John Scott) successive editions of the Oxford Sociology textbook.

Read more