The Power of Choice

The Power of Choice Plot Summary

Introduction

In today's competitive business landscape, the greatest untapped resource lies not in technology or capital, but in human potential. Most organizations operate on an unstated but pervasive assumption that talent is innately distributed - "some have it, some don't" - which leads to investing development resources in only a select few employees deemed "high potential." This flawed paradigm results in massive waste of human capability, with research suggesting that up to 80% of employees are not fully engaged with their work. The alternative paradigm presented challenges this fundamental assumption about human capability. Through evidence-based analysis and real-world case studies, a powerful case emerges for creating inclusive development environments where all employees receive opportunities for growth. This approach isn't merely about fairness or representation - it's about business performance. When organizations position all employees for success through clear standards, meaningful assignments, and constructive feedback, they unlock vastly greater innovation, productivity, and adaptability. By examining both organizational structures and individual manager behaviors that either enable or block development, we gain practical insights into transforming workplaces into engines of continuous improvement where human potential becomes the ultimate competitive advantage.

Chapter 1: The Flawed Assumptions: Challenging the 'Castes in Concrete' Model

At the heart of most organizational development practices lies what can be called the "Castes in Concrete" model - a deeply embedded belief system that assumes talent and ability are innately and unequally distributed among people. This model, operating often unconsciously, creates a self-perpetuating system where organizations quickly identify their "high potentials" and invest disproportionate development resources in them, while most other employees receive minimal opportunities for growth. The "sort and select" approach begins early, often mirroring patterns from educational systems where students are divided into ability groups that tend to become self-fulfilling prophecies. When translated to workplace settings, managers unconsciously select those most similar to themselves for stretch assignments, mentoring, and visibility. These selected few receive more attention, more challenging work, and most importantly, more support through their inevitable mistakes and failures. Their successes then reinforce the original assumption that they were inherently more talented. For the majority of employees who aren't selected for this special treatment, the experience is dramatically different. Without access to challenging assignments or support through learning curves, their potential remains dormant. Their performance typically plateaus or declines, leading managers to conclude their initial assessments were correct. The true tragedy is that this becomes another self-fulfilling prophecy - these employees often respond by disengaging, reducing their efforts, or seeking opportunities elsewhere. Research from social psychology demonstrates how powerful these expectations can be. Studies by Carol Dweck revealed that students who believe intelligence is fixed tend to develop a "proving orientation" - they either avoid challenges entirely to prevent failure, or they become consumed with proving their worth rather than focusing on learning. This orientation debilitates effort and leads to what Dweck calls the "helpless response" to difficulty. The most compelling evidence against the "Castes in Concrete" model comes from examining how high-performers actually develop. Their success typically stems from a process rather than innate ability - they received early opportunities, support through difficulties, and constructive feedback that built both skills and confidence. This development process is observable, repeatable, and potentially available to a much broader population than currently receives it. The business cost of this flawed model is staggering. With only a small percentage of employees fully engaged and developing, organizations operate far below their potential capacity for innovation, productivity, and adaptability. In a knowledge and service economy where human capability represents the primary competitive advantage, this waste is increasingly unsustainable.

Chapter 2: Quality Treatment: Eliminating Barriers to Employee Development

The path to unlocking workforce potential begins with recognizing and eliminating "Negative Treatment" - the range of exclusionary behaviors that undermine employee confidence and performance. Negative Treatment encompasses subtle and often unconscious interactions that communicate low expectations or disinterest in an employee's development. These interactions range from condescension and indifference to outright hostility, and they dramatically impact an employee's ability to contribute effectively. These negative interactions aren't necessarily rooted in conscious bias. They stem from natural human tendencies to feel more comfortable with those who resemble ourselves in background, work style, or appearance. When managers unconsciously favor those who remind them of themselves, they unwittingly create different development tracks starting from an employee's first day. Consider how a manager might warmly welcome a new employee who seems familiar, immediately connecting them with key people and challenging assignments, while greeting another new hire with subtle cues communicating lower expectations. Stereotypes represent a particularly damaging form of Negative Treatment. These commonly held assumptions about groups - rather than individuals - prevent managers from seeing an employee's true potential. When managers operate from stereotypical thinking, they often create self-fulfilling prophecies where their assumptions about lesser capability lead to providing fewer development opportunities, which then results in the very underperformance they predicted. Stanford psychologist Claude Steele's research on "stereotype threat" demonstrates how powerfully these expectations can depress performance, even among highly capable individuals. The antidote to Negative Treatment is what can be termed "Quality Treatment" - constructive interactions designed to build confidence and capacity in every employee. Quality Treatment involves four critical elements: setting clear performance standards, providing positive development opportunities, delivering ongoing feedback on progress, and offering appropriate emotional support. This approach creates a virtuous cycle where employees gain confidence from meeting challenges, which inspires them to pursue further development. Implementing Quality Treatment requires managers to develop awareness of their own tendencies toward differential treatment. Organizations can support this transformation through a systematic process of observing interaction patterns, identifying exclusionary behaviors, declaring Negative Treatment unacceptable, and creating opportunities for positive interactions. Rather than focusing on blame or punishment, effective leaders emphasize how eliminating Negative Treatment improves business results by enabling all employees to contribute their best efforts. The most compelling evidence for Quality Treatment comes from controlled studies showing how quickly performance improves when negative expectations are removed. Steele's research demonstrated that simply stating that a test did not measure ability neutralized performance gaps between groups. Similarly, workplaces that replace signals of low expectations with genuine belief in everyone's potential see immediate performance improvements across previously underutilized employee groups.

Chapter 3: Managing Inclusion: Positioning All Employees for Success

The practical implementation of inclusive development falls primarily to managers, who through hundreds of daily interactions either enable or block employee growth. While senior leadership establishes the strategic importance of inclusion, it is frontline managers who determine whether an inclusive culture becomes reality. Effective inclusive managers understand the business imperative behind developing all employees: in a knowledge economy, the contribution of each person matters tremendously to overall organizational performance. The core practice of inclusive management centers on what can be called "positioning" employees for success. Position refers not to job title but to the characteristics of assignments and corresponding support that enable development. Positive positioning occurs when managers provide assignments that serve as platforms for learning, stimulate skill development, and include appropriate support and feedback. Through thoughtful positioning, managers can engage far more employees in what might be called "Learning Loops" - cycles of continuous learning that lead to continuous improvement in products, services, and processes. The complementary element to positioning is "disposition" - an employee's level of confidence, determination and commitment to seize development opportunities. While disposition may appear to be solely the responsibility of individual employees, managers profoundly influence it through their treatment. Negative positioning - withholding challenging assignments or support - naturally produces negative disposition, where employees become disengaged, hesitant, or even resentful. This creates another self-reinforcing cycle where managers, observing poor disposition, feel justified in continuing to withhold positive positioning. Breaking this negative cycle requires managers to understand the connection between treatment and performance. Inclusive managers recognize that chronic negative disposition often results from years of exclusion or harsh criticism. They respond by exploring root causes non-judgmentally, identifying symptoms like unproductive anger or withdrawal, and developing strategies to rebuild trust. Most importantly, they begin offering meaningful development opportunities while providing appropriate support, creating the conditions where positive disposition can emerge. The practical implementation of inclusive management involves both short-term "jump-start" actions and longer-term strategies. In the short term, managers can audit their work distribution patterns, intentionally broaden assignments beyond their usual "go-to" people, and provide special attention to employees tackling stretch assignments for the first time. Longer-term strategies include establishing the same high performance standards for everyone, designing assignments that contribute meaningfully to business objectives, reinforcing learning through recognition, and providing constructive feedback that guides continuous improvement. Perhaps the most challenging aspect of inclusive management is providing honest, constructive feedback across differences. Many managers avoid giving critical feedback to employees different from themselves out of fear of being perceived as biased. However, withholding feedback ultimately undermines development and reinforces exclusion. Inclusive managers overcome this challenge by focusing feedback on specific behaviors rather than personal characteristics, making it interactive rather than one-way, and ensuring it provides clear guidance for future improvement.

Chapter 4: Strategic Leadership: Creating a Culture of Development

Sustainable cultural change toward inclusion requires committed, strategic leadership from the top of the organization. Building an inclusive culture of development follows a predictable model of ever-deepening commitment, beginning with compliance (where behavior changes to receive rewards or avoid punishment), progressing through identification (where individuals model themselves after respected leaders), and ultimately reaching internalization (where inclusive values become part of individuals' own belief systems). Leaders drive this progression through several critical actions. First, they must fully understand and articulate the business case for inclusion as it applies to their specific industry and organization. This goes beyond generic statements about diversity to identify concrete impacts on recruitment, retention, market access, innovation, and customer satisfaction. For example, demographic shifts in the workforce (approaching 70% women and people of color in new entrants by 2030) make inclusion a competitive necessity for accessing talent, while increasingly diverse markets demand diverse perspectives to identify and serve customer needs. Communicating this business case represents another leadership imperative. Effective leaders weave the message of inclusion into every speech, meeting, and conversation, making it clear this initiative carries the same importance as other strategic priorities. Personal stories and insights demonstrate authentic commitment, showing that inclusion isn't merely a program but a business philosophy integral to the company's future success. Leaders must also break through their isolation to understand what's really happening in their organizations. Senior executives often receive filtered information that obscures workplace realities, particularly regarding inclusion. By examining turnover rates, employee surveys, recruitment patterns, internal promotion statistics, and succession planning data, leaders gain insight into exclusionary patterns that may be invisible from the executive suite. This data collection serves as both a baseline for measuring progress and a guide for designing effective interventions. Perhaps the most powerful leadership action is modeling inclusive behavior. This begins with personal interactions - considering who receives mentoring, sponsorship, and informal access. It continues through positioning and promotion decisions, where leaders demonstrate commitment by ensuring diverse candidates receive development opportunities and by withstanding pressure to revert to familiar patterns. Community involvement choices also signal priorities, as do funding decisions for inclusion initiatives. Leaders create lasting impact by treating inclusion as a legacy issue - a fundamental transformation that will secure the company's future competitiveness. As executives approach retirement, they gain perspective on what truly matters for long-term business success. Building an inclusive culture of development represents a legacy that outlasts quarterly earnings reports, positioning the organization to maximize human potential in an increasingly diverse global marketplace. This perspective enables leaders to make investments that may not show immediate returns but will determine the organization's ability to thrive in coming decades.

Chapter 5: Measuring Progress: Demonstrating the Business Impact of Inclusion

Implementing inclusion requires robust measurement systems to track progress, demonstrate results, and guide continuous improvement. Skeptical stakeholders often demand proof that inclusion initiatives deliver business benefits, making measurement crucial for sustaining organizational commitment. Effective measurement begins with establishing a baseline that captures the current state of inclusion and development within the organization. Comprehensive baseline data should include business metrics (market share, customer satisfaction, productivity), organizational indicators (demographic profiles, recruitment patterns, turnover rates), development statistics (distribution of key assignments, advancement patterns), and employee feedback (satisfaction surveys, focus groups). This data should be analyzed by relevant demographic and organizational variables to identify patterns that may signal exclusionary practices or development gaps. With this baseline established, organizations can set realistic, measurable goals and design targeted interventions. The most effective approach measures progress at multiple levels, beginning with documenting behavior change among managers and employees. Using 360-degree feedback instruments before and after interventions reveals whether managers are actually implementing inclusive behaviors and removing barriers to development. This documentation of behavior change serves as the foundation for measuring higher-level outcomes. The business impact of inclusion can be tracked through indicators like improved retention of key talent, increased diversity at all levels, higher employee engagement, enhanced customer satisfaction, and expanded market share. While establishing direct cause-effect relationships between inclusion initiatives and these outcomes can be challenging, organizations can demonstrate compelling correlations that satisfy most stakeholders' need for evidence. Organizations that integrate measurement throughout implementation achieve significantly better results than those relying on training alone. One case study compared two companies implementing similar inclusion workshops. The company that established baseline measures of manager behavior through 360-degree feedback, then tracked behavior change over time, identified both individual progress and organizational barriers. This measurement-guided approach correlated with improved business indicators, while the company without measurement showed minimal improvement. Accountability represents another crucial element in measuring inclusion progress. Many organizations find that managers quickly discover renewed commitment to inclusion when their behavior is measured and factored into performance evaluations, advancement decisions, and compensation. Without such accountability, even well-received training rarely translates into sustained behavior change or business results. Process measures also provide valuable opportunities for course correction during implementation. By monitoring participation, satisfaction, and interim outcomes, organizations can identify implementation challenges and adjust strategies accordingly. For example, focus groups with mentoring program participants might reveal scheduling difficulties that can be addressed through simple procedural changes, significantly improving program effectiveness. The ultimate demonstration of inclusion's business value comes from linking behavioral changes to concrete business outcomes like winning the war for talent, maximizing performance, and capturing market share. While precise attribution of cause and effect may remain elusive, the compelling correlations between inclusive management and improved business results provide sufficient evidence for all but the most skeptical stakeholders.

Chapter 6: Global Applications: Implementing Inclusive Development Across Cultures

The principles of inclusive development transcend geographic and cultural boundaries, though their application must respect local contexts. As the global economy becomes increasingly interconnected through cross-border mergers, technological advancement, and changing migration patterns, organizations face both the challenge and opportunity of building inclusive cultures across diverse cultural settings. Regardless of location, the fundamental business proposition remains: attention to inclusion and development improves performance by maximizing the contribution of every employee. Implementing inclusion globally requires understanding how exclusionary practices manifest in different cultural contexts. While the specific "collars" of exclusion vary - they might involve language, bilingual ability, age, skin color, country of origin, education, family background, caste, or gender - the underlying patterns are remarkably similar across cultures. In each setting, certain groups face barriers to full participation, with resulting waste of potential that diminishes organizational performance. Building the business case represents the essential first step in any cultural context. This involves focusing on the full utilization of workforce capability, framing any barrier to employee contribution as a lost business opportunity, and initiating conversations about the salient exclusionary practices in that particular culture. When presented as a business strategy rather than an imported social agenda, inclusion resonates with leaders across cultural contexts. The concepts of "Negative Treatment" and "Quality Treatment" prove universally applicable, though their specific manifestations differ. In Japan, for example, where conformity and respect for hierarchy are central cultural values, Quality Treatment might not involve the direct feedback typical in Western contexts. Instead, managers might demonstrate Quality Treatment by actively listening to younger employees' opinions while maintaining appropriate cultural formality. The key is identifying culturally appropriate methods to encourage development while respecting prevailing values. Local leadership plays a decisive role in successful global implementation. Having respected local leaders publicly endorse and model inclusive behaviors creates legitimacy that outside experts or corporate mandates alone cannot achieve. This requires investing time in helping local leaders understand the business case in their specific context and respecting their insights about appropriate implementation strategies. Human resources procedures must be carefully designed to facilitate inclusion across cultural boundaries. This begins with practical considerations like ensuring employees have what they need to establish themselves in new environments and showing respect for local language through appropriate translations and communication styles. It extends to creating safe spaces for exploring cultural differences and paying particular attention to how women are treated across global operations, as gender issues transcend geographic boundaries despite varying manifestations. Training design requires special sensitivity to cultural norms. Interactive exercises that work well in one culture may be counterproductive in another - for example, role-playing might cause uncomfortable "loss of face" in some Asian contexts, while competitive games might conflict with cultural values emphasizing humility in India. Effective global training adapts both content and methodology to incorporate local concepts while maintaining core principles of inclusion and development. While cultural differences require thoughtful adaptation, the fundamental premises of inclusive development remain valid worldwide. The path to implementation may differ, and progress may occur at varying rates, but organizations that commit to understanding local contexts while maintaining clear inclusion goals achieve improved performance across global operations. As one HR executive with extensive global experience observed, the principles of inclusive development "have legs well beyond the U.S." because they address the universal human desire to contribute and develop in a supportive environment.

Summary

The transformative power of inclusive development lies in its fundamental reconceptualization of human potential. Rather than viewing talent as innately distributed among a select few, this approach recognizes that excellence emerges through a systematic process of development available to most employees. By eliminating the barriers of Negative Treatment, providing Quality Treatment to all, and positioning every employee for growth-producing challenges, organizations unlock exponentially greater innovation, adaptability, and productivity. The journey toward inclusion requires coordinated effort at multiple levels: strategic leadership that articulates the business imperative and models inclusive behavior; managers who master the skills of positioning diverse employees for success; human resource systems aligned to support development at critical career touchpoints; and measurement processes that demonstrate progress and guide continuous improvement. When implemented systematically, inclusive development creates a virtuous cycle where employees at all levels engage in Learning Loops that continuously improve products, services, and processes. For organizations seeking sustainable competitive advantage in an increasingly diverse global economy, there is perhaps no more powerful strategy than building a culture where every employee has both the opportunity and the support to contribute their fullest potential.

About Author

Loading...

Michael C Hyter

Read more