The Wellness Syndrome

The Wellness Syndrome Plot Summary

Introduction

Health and wellness have transformed from mere conditions of physical wellbeing into moral imperatives that guide our social lives. In contemporary society, being a good person increasingly means living well - eating correctly, exercising regularly, thinking positively, and monitoring our bodies with vigilant attention. This wellness ideology operates as a powerful command that tells us we must constantly work on optimizing ourselves through self-discipline, mindfulness, and perpetual self-improvement. But rather than making us happier or healthier, this obsession with personal wellness may be creating new forms of anxiety, self-blame, and guilt. The wellness command works insidiously, infiltrating every aspect of our existence from workplace wellness programs to social media trends that celebrate "clean eating" and athletic achievement. What makes this phenomenon particularly troubling is how it shifts responsibility for wellbeing entirely onto individuals, regardless of their circumstances. When health becomes an ideology, those who fail to conform become stigmatized - not simply as unhealthy, but as morally deficient. Fatness, smoking, or simply showing insufficient enthusiasm for self-improvement are treated as character flaws deserving of social contempt. This moralization of health has significant political implications, as structural problems are reframed as matters of personal choice and responsibility.

Chapter 1: The Emergence of Biomorality: Defining the Wellness Command

The concept of biomorality captures how health and wellness have transformed into moral imperatives in contemporary society. Happiness, fitness, and overall wellbeing are no longer merely desirable states but have become ethical obligations. This moral shift fundamentally changes how we judge ourselves and others - a person who feels good and maintains proper health is considered a good person, while someone who feels bad or neglects health standards is deemed morally deficient. This wellness imperative operates as a command, but unlike traditional moral injunctions that restrict behavior, the wellness command pushes us toward constant self-improvement and optimization. It functions similarly to what philosophers describe as a "superego injunction to enjoy" - we must not only be healthy but must actively pursue wellness with enthusiasm and dedication. Paradoxically, this obligation to enjoy wellness often undermines actual enjoyment, as the pressure to optimize ourselves generates anxiety rather than satisfaction. What makes the wellness command particularly insidious is how it presents itself as voluntary choice rather than external imposition. The wellness industry sells self-improvement as empowerment and self-actualization, masking how these "choices" align with broader economic and political agendas. The emphasis on individual responsibility effectively obscures systemic factors affecting health, like inequality, environmental conditions, or workplace stress. The wellness syndrome emerges when this command becomes pathological. Instead of enhancing life, the obsessive pursuit of wellness begins to diminish it. Constant self-monitoring creates anxiety; inevitable failures to meet wellness standards generate guilt; and the narcissistic focus on bodily optimization leaves little room for other values or experiences. The body becomes an ultimate object around which all decisions revolve - dictating where we live, what we eat, who we associate with, and how we spend our time. When wellness becomes a syndrome, people experience wellness not as freedom but as compulsion. Ordinary pleasures become medicalized activities, with meals transformed from social experiences into calculated nutritional inputs. The dining table, as one critic notes, "is no longer the altar of succulent delights" but "a pharmacy counter where we keep an eye on our fats and calories." This medicalization extends beyond food to all aspects of life, creating a perpetual state of anxious self-scrutiny.

Chapter 2: The Perfect Human: From Life Coaching to Mindful Performance

Life coaching emerged as a key technology of wellness optimization, offering strategies to unlock inner potential and overcome personal limitations. Unlike traditional therapy, coaching focuses less on resolving past traumas and more on enhancing future performance. Coaches operate as "benevolent helpers" who avoid appearing authoritarian while still shaping behavior toward predetermined wellness goals. The central promise of coaching is that happiness, success, and fulfillment are choices available to anyone willing to work on themselves. This vision of personal transformation aligns perfectly with what sociologists call "the new spirit of capitalism" - a cultural ethos that celebrates flexibility, connectivity, and self-expression. The idealized human in this system is what might be called the "wo/man of now" - perpetually adapting, always networking, endlessly upbeat. This figure blends previously contradictory traits: they are simultaneously corporate and countercultural, career-focused yet relationship-oriented, intensely ambitious yet seemingly relaxed. The perfect human in wellness culture doesn't just perform well; they must appear authentic while doing so. Mindfulness practices exemplify this fusion of performance and authenticity. Google's "Search Inside Yourself" program, pioneered by engineer Chade-Meng Tan, teaches corporate employees to optimize themselves by increasing their emotional intelligence through mindfulness meditation. The promise is greater productivity alongside deeper self-awareness - a perfect synthesis of corporate goals and spiritual fulfillment. What such programs rarely acknowledge is how they shift responsibility for workplace stress onto individual employees rather than addressing structural causes. The emphasis on individual responsibility extends to all aspects of health. Smokers, once commonplace, have become morally suspect figures who face increasing discrimination. Some American hospitals have gone beyond banning smoking to banning smokers entirely, testing prospective employees for nicotine use. Such policies are justified through economic calculations about decreased productivity and higher healthcare costs, but they represent a broader trend of treating health behaviors as moral indicators. This moralization creates a troubling distinction between wellness enthusiasts and those deemed negligent about their health. Failure to maintain wellness standards becomes not just a personal health risk but a mark of moral deficiency. As wellness expands into all aspects of life, everyday activities from eating to exercising become opportunities for moral evaluation. Politics itself becomes personal - transformed from collective deliberation about shared resources into individual lifestyle choices aimed at bodily optimization.

Chapter 3: The Health Bazaar: Diet Culture and Class Disgust

The marketplace of health has transformed eating from a cultural and social practice into a highly moralized activity. Diet culture exemplifies how ordinary behaviors have become subject to intense scrutiny and optimization. The modern dieter doesn't simply aim to lose weight; they pursue an entire lifestyle transformation that promises redemption through bodily discipline. Dietary regimens often evoke a mythical past - whether biblical times, paleolithic ancestors, or Eden itself - suggesting a return to some imagined state of natural purity before the corruption of modern life. Corporate wellness programs have enthusiastically embraced this ethos, implementing elaborate interventions to engineer healthier workers. Swedish truck manufacturer Scania exemplifies this approach with its "24-hour employee" philosophy, which extends corporate influence beyond working hours into employees' private lives. Through health profiles, improvement groups, and "health talks," employees are questioned about everything from their eating habits to their sleeping patterns and existential aspirations. Paradoxically, many employees welcome these interventions, seeing fitness as a form of employment insurance in precarious economic times. The wellness imperative has significant class dimensions that are often overlooked. Television shows featuring "fat" working-class subjects being disciplined by trim middle-class experts reveal how dietary morality intersects with class prejudice. Programs like "You Are What You Eat" or "The Biggest Loser" ostensibly aim to help participants but simultaneously function as spectacles of moral failure for middle-class viewers. As sociologist Bev Skeggs observes, these shows present working-class people, especially mothers, as "incapable of knowing how to look after themselves and others." This class dimension becomes explicit in popular representations of "chavs" - stereotyped working-class figures portrayed as overweight, oversexed, and out of control. The very bodies of these individuals become sites of moral judgment, with their presumed dietary choices and lifestyles treated as evidence of moral deficiency. As George Orwell noted decades ago in "The Road to Wigan Pier," class distinctions often operate through visceral disgust rather than rational assessment. Today's dietary morality continues this tradition, with disgust for unhealthy eating habits serving as a thinly veiled expression of class contempt. Celebrity chef Jamie Oliver's "food revolution" campaigns illustrate how dietary interventions can simultaneously express genuine concern while reinforcing class hierarchies. His efforts to reform school meals in disadvantaged areas framed dietary choices as the primary determinant of children's futures, with "Turkey Twizzlers" symbolizing all that was wrong with working-class culture. While addressing genuine health concerns, such initiatives often bypass broader structural issues of poverty, education funding, and inequality in favor of moral entrepreneurship centered on individual food choices. The implicit message is that social problems can be solved through proper consumption rather than collective political action.

Chapter 4: The Happiness Doctrine: Positivity as Mandatory Self-Work

Happiness has transformed from a desirable state into a mandatory project of self-development. Positive psychology, pioneered by Martin Seligman, frames happiness as a scientifically verifiable condition that individuals must actively pursue. Unlike earlier therapeutic approaches that aimed to alleviate suffering, positive psychology focuses on enhancing wellbeing in those already functioning adequately - moving people, in Seligman's words, "from plus two to plus seven" rather than merely from "minus five to minus three." This happiness doctrine has deep historical roots in American culture. Barbara Ehrenreich traces it back to the shift from Calvinism to the New Thought movement in the mid-nineteenth century, which replaced religious self-denial with an emphasis on mind power and self-affirmation. Norman Vincent Peale's 1952 bestseller "The Power of Positive Thinking" popularized this approach, offering practical techniques for building confidence and achieving success through mental attitude. What unites these various approaches is the fundamental assumption that happiness is primarily a choice - individuals bear responsibility for their emotional states regardless of external circumstances. A crucial aspect of this doctrine is the belief that happiness causes success rather than resulting from it. Business scholars enthusiastically embraced this premise, arguing that happy workers are more productive, creative, and resilient. This perspective conveniently aligns with management ideologies that locate problems within individual psychology rather than workplace conditions or economic structures. When employees feel dissatisfied, the solution is not to improve their conditions but to adjust their attitudes through techniques like mindfulness training or positive thinking exercises. The happiness doctrine reached the political sphere when British Prime Minister David Cameron launched a national wellbeing survey in 2010, during the implementation of austerity measures. This initiative relied on research suggesting that objective circumstances have minimal impact on subjective wellbeing - a convenient finding when cutting public services. If lottery winners and accident victims report similar happiness levels, as one famous study suggested, then improving material conditions seems less urgent than enhancing attitudes. This political application reveals the doctrine's ideological function. When Rhonda Byrne's "The Secret" claims that wealth accrues to those who maintain positive thoughts, it effectively justifies inequality as the natural result of mental attitude rather than structural advantage. As Ehrenreich observes, "the flip side of positivity is thus a harsh insistence on personal responsibility" - illness, poverty, and misfortune become attributable to negative thinking rather than systemic factors. This cruel optimism places immense pressure on individuals while absolving collective institutions of responsibility. The ultimate paradox of mandatory happiness lies in its self-defeating nature. The more intensely we pursue happiness as an obligation, the more elusive it becomes. The pressure to maintain positive emotions at all times creates what Mark Fisher calls "depressive hedonia" - a state where the relentless pursuit of pleasure itself becomes exhausting and unsatisfying. Instead of genuine joy, the happiness doctrine produces anxious subjects perpetually monitoring their emotional states for signs of failure.

Chapter 5: The Chosen Life: Self-Optimization and Market Value

The imperative to optimize oneself has become central to contemporary existence, particularly in relation to employment and market value. Job seekers are now instructed to view unemployment not as a structural economic problem but as an opportunity for self-development. Support organizations advise the unemployed to treat job searching as "a full-time job" requiring constant self-marketing and personal transformation. When jobs are scarce, individuals are told to avoid mentioning economic conditions and instead focus on overcoming their "inner obstacles" through positive thinking and personal branding. This focus on individual responsibility represents a significant shift in how employment is understood. While earlier approaches to "employability" acknowledged structural factors, the contemporary model places the burden entirely on individuals to make themselves attractive to potential employers. Those who fail to find work are encouraged to blame themselves rather than economic conditions. One jobseeker in Ofer Sharone's research expressed this internalized responsibility: "The hardest thing is feeling that there is something wrong with me that I am not finding a job." Self-quantification has emerged as a crucial technology of self-optimization. The "quantified self movement" uses wearable devices and apps to track everything from steps taken to sleep patterns to emotional states. Enthusiasts like Chris Dancy, who lost his job in 2009, use self-tracking not primarily for health benefits but to make themselves more competitive in the job market. By recording and analyzing every aspect of daily life, self-trackers treat their bodies as enterprises requiring constant monitoring and enhancement. This merging of self and market extends to the workplace, where employers increasingly track employees' bodies and behaviors. The hedge fund GLG Partners correlates traders' lifestyle factors like sleep and diet with their performance, offering coaching to those whose bodies show suboptimal patterns. The Chicago Teachers Union reluctantly accepted a contract requiring members to share biometric information and engage in wellness activities or face financial penalties. Such monitoring transforms even the most intimate bodily functions into potential sites of workplace optimization. Gamification has further blurred the boundary between self-improvement and market performance. Applications like "Epic Win" turn everyday tasks into games with rewards and achievements, promising to make self-discipline enjoyable. By incorporating behavioral psychology principles pioneered by B.F. Skinner, these apps shape behavior through carefully calibrated reward systems. The paradox is striking: individuals who might resist explicit authority willingly submit to algorithmic control when packaged as self-help. This regime of optimization ultimately transforms choice into a cruel game of chance. While the rhetoric emphasizes individual agency and self-determination, success increasingly depends on being "chosen" rather than choosing. As corporations use game-based assessments to identify employees with the right "psyche and intellect," the line between meritocracy and lottery blurs. Zygmunt Bauman's observation that "all of us are doomed to the life of choices, but not all of us have the means to be the choosers" has been inverted - now the challenge is having the means to be chosen, whether by paying for internships or having the right genetic predisposition for success.

Chapter 6: Resistance and Escape: Finding Freedom from Wellness

Various forms of resistance to the wellness imperative have emerged, often in unexpected places. Illness itself can provide a temporary escape from the relentless demands of self-optimization. In Karl Ove Knausgaard's autobiographical novel, he describes the surprising pleasure of being incapacitated: despite physical pain, he experiences relief at being "not in a position to do anything." Similarly, web developer Rob Lucas notes how illness becomes "a holiday that the body demands for itself" amid constant workplace pressures. These moments of forced passivity create spaces where one is temporarily excused from the obligation to be productive. Such escapes remain precarious, however. Contemporary culture has dramatically reduced tolerance for necessary idleness. While tuberculosis patients in Thomas Mann's "The Magic Mountain" could retreat to sanatoriums for years, today's workers face pressure to minimize recovery time and remain "productive" even during illness. Moreover, the modern patient is expected not simply to rest but to actively work on recovery through positive thinking, support groups, and wellness regimens. Illness becomes yet another arena for self-improvement rather than genuine respite. Some resistance takes more deliberately transgressive forms. The "Fat Acceptance" movement challenges stigmatization of larger bodies, arguing that physical size should not determine social worth or healthcare access. Organizations like the National Association to Advance Fat Acceptance advocate for civil rights protections while promoting the idea that one can be both fat and healthy. However, this movement often remains caught within wellness discourse by emphasizing that overweight individuals can still be active, positive, and productive - essentially arguing for inclusion within existing wellness criteria rather than fundamentally challenging those standards. Perhaps the most radical rejection of wellness imperatives comes from communities that deliberately embrace risk. Tim Dean's study of "barebacking" - gay men having unprotected sex - reveals how some individuals reject safety norms to create alternative forms of intimacy and experience. By confronting mortality rather than obsessively avoiding risk, these communities develop what Dean calls "skepticism regarding ideals of health and risk-avoidance." Their practices directly challenge the assumption that maximizing safety and longevity should be life's primary goal. These various forms of resistance highlight both the difficulties and possibilities of escaping the wellness syndrome. Passive resistance through illness provides only temporary relief; identity-based movements like Fat Acceptance often remain trapped within wellness discourse; and deliberate risk-taking creates new forms of authenticity-seeking that mirror wellness culture's fixation on self-expression. True liberation might require abandoning the pursuit of an optimized self altogether - accepting human impotence rather than chasing limitless potential, finding value in failure rather than perpetual improvement, and redirecting attention from personal wellness to social transformation.

Summary

The wellness syndrome represents a fundamental transformation in how we understand morality and selfhood. What began as legitimate concern for health has morphed into a comprehensive ideological system that judges individuals primarily by their ability to maintain physical and mental optimization. This biomorality reframes all aspects of existence - from eating to working to emotional life - as opportunities for self-improvement, with failures treated as moral deficiencies rather than normal human limitations. The result is not enhanced wellbeing but rather perpetual anxiety, narcissistic self-absorption, and social division between those who successfully perform wellness and those deemed deficient. The ultimate challenge is not to reject health or happiness outright, but to separate their pursuit from moralized judgment and compulsive optimization. We might recognize that human value extends beyond productivity and performance, that imperfection is inevitable rather than shameful, and that meaningful life often involves encounters with difficulty rather than their elimination. Rather than endlessly perfecting our bodies and monitoring our emotions, we might redirect attention to the social and political conditions that shape collective wellbeing. The path beyond the wellness syndrome involves accepting human limits while recognizing that many sources of suffering lie not within individual psychology but in the structures that determine how we live together.

About Author

Loading...

Carl Cederström

Read more

Related Books by Carl Cederström

Loading...

The Happiness Fantasy

Carl Cederström

A history of happiness

★★★½☆3.6