Attack from Within

Attack from Within Plot Summary

Introduction

Democracy depends on citizens making informed decisions based on shared facts, yet today's information ecosystem increasingly undermines this foundation. The deliberate spread of false information has evolved from a peripheral concern to an existential threat to democratic governance worldwide. Disinformation campaigns exploit psychological vulnerabilities, leverage technological platforms, and take advantage of constitutional freedoms to sow division, erode trust in institutions, and ultimately threaten the peaceful transfer of power. The consequences extend far beyond abstract concerns about truth—they manifest in concrete harms including political violence, public health crises, and the fundamental breakdown of democratic discourse. Understanding how disinformation operates, why humans are susceptible to it, and what makes American democracy particularly vulnerable provides essential context for developing effective countermeasures. By examining both the mechanisms of manipulation and potential solutions, we can identify paths forward that protect both factual integrity and democratic freedoms in an increasingly complex information environment.

Chapter 1: The Authoritarian Playbook: Tactics for Undermining Truth

Authoritarians throughout history have employed a consistent set of tactics to manipulate truth and consolidate power at the expense of democratic institutions. Central to this approach is the deliberate creation of a crisis narrative that portrays society as in decline, requiring a strong leader to restore a mythologized past greatness. This strategy of declinism generates fear while positioning the authoritarian as the singular savior capable of addressing manufactured emergencies. Division serves as another crucial element in the authoritarian strategy. While democracies seek to unite citizens around common goals despite differences, authoritarians deliberately exploit societal fault lines to amass personal power. They present the world in stark binary terms—you are either with them or against them—and frame prosperity as a zero-sum game where gains for others necessarily mean losses for "us." By demonizing opponents as not merely wrong but evil or treasonous, they create an environment where compromise becomes impossible and supporters feel justified in taking extreme measures against perceived enemies. The systematic undermining of accountability mechanisms represents another hallmark of the authoritarian approach. By labeling the free press as "the enemy of the people," dismissing government agencies as the "deep state," and portraying experts as "elites" who disdain ordinary citizens, authoritarians liberate themselves from scrutiny. Rather than engaging with criticism on substantive grounds, they launch personal attacks to discredit critics, creating an environment where disinformation flourishes unchecked by independent verification. The normalization of political violence further enables authoritarian control. Through consistent use of violent imagery and rhetoric, authoritarians desensitize the public to cruelty and make violence seem like an acceptable cost of achieving their vision. This approach creates a chilling effect on dissent—people learn to keep quiet rather than risk ridicule or harm. When leaders praise those who physically assault critics or tell law enforcement not to worry about being "too nice" when arresting suspects, they signal approval of violence against perceived enemies. Perhaps most insidiously, authoritarians craft a carefully balanced image of themselves as simultaneously ordinary and extraordinary—both "one of us" and a superhuman savior. They present themselves as regular people who understand the struggles of ordinary citizens while also claiming unique abilities to solve the nation's problems. Once supporters bond with this persona, they often stop caring about factual inconsistencies or moral failings. This blind loyalty becomes the foundation upon which disinformation campaigns can be built and sustained, threatening the very essence of democratic governance.

Chapter 2: Psychological Vulnerabilities: Why We Fall for Deception

Human psychology contains inherent vulnerabilities that make us susceptible to disinformation despite our best intentions. Our brains evolved to process information efficiently rather than perfectly, leading to cognitive shortcuts that can be exploited by those seeking to manipulate public opinion. In times of uncertainty and rapid social change, these psychological tendencies become even more pronounced, creating fertile ground for disinformation to take root. Confirmation bias represents one of our most significant vulnerabilities. We naturally gravitate toward information that confirms our existing beliefs while discounting evidence that contradicts them. This tendency serves as a cognitive shortcut—it requires less mental effort to incorporate information that fits our existing worldview than to reconstruct that worldview entirely. Studies demonstrate that even when presented with clear evidence contradicting their beliefs, many people become more entrenched in their original position—a phenomenon known as the "backfire effect." This explains why simple fact-checking often fails to correct false beliefs, particularly when those beliefs are tied to political identity. Our innate pattern-seeking tendencies further increase vulnerability to manipulation. Humans evolved to identify patterns and causal relationships, which helped our ancestors predict threats and opportunities. This same tendency makes us susceptible to conspiracy theories that offer simple, comprehensive explanations for complex events. When faced with uncertainty or threatening situations, many people find comfort in narratives that provide clear villains and heroes, even when these narratives lack factual support. This psychological need becomes particularly acute during periods of social change or perceived status threat. Tribal identity and social conformity play crucial roles in our susceptibility to false information. As social creatures who evolved depending on group acceptance for survival, we often adopt beliefs that signal loyalty to our social groups rather than those supported by evidence. This "tribal epistemology"—where truth becomes whatever serves the interests of one's group—explains why factual corrections often fail to persuade when the misinformation supports group identity. For many people, maintaining membership in a valued group matters more than factual accuracy on specific issues, leading them to embrace even obviously false claims when those claims become markers of group belonging. The emotional impact of information often overwhelms rational evaluation. Content that triggers strong emotions—particularly fear, outrage, and moral indignation—spreads faster and lodges more deeply in memory than neutral information. Disinformation campaigns deliberately exploit these emotional triggers to maximize impact and bypass critical thinking. When emotionally activated, we become less likely to verify information before accepting and sharing it. This explains why false news spreads significantly faster on social media than accurate information—it can be engineered specifically to trigger the emotional responses that drive engagement. Cognitive dissonance further complicates our relationship with truth. When presented with information that challenges important self-perceptions or worldviews, people experience significant psychological discomfort. Rather than accepting information that causes this discomfort, many engage in elaborate rationalization to preserve existing beliefs. This explains why supporters of political figures often remain loyal even when presented with clear evidence of misconduct—acknowledging the truth would require painful reconsideration of their judgment and identity. Combined with our limited cognitive resources in an information-saturated environment, these psychological tendencies create perfect conditions for disinformation to flourish.

Chapter 3: Digital Amplification: How Technology Accelerates Falsehoods

Digital technology has transformed disinformation from a slow, labor-intensive process into a high-velocity, low-cost operation capable of reaching millions instantly. Research indicates that false information spreads six times faster than truthful content online, creating an environment where lies consistently outpace corrections. This acceleration stems from several technological factors that make digital platforms particularly effective vectors for false narratives. Social media algorithms designed to maximize engagement inadvertently privilege emotionally provocative content over factual accuracy. These systems analyze user behavior to identify content that triggers strong reactions—particularly outrage, fear, and tribal affirmation—and then promote this content to maximize time spent on platforms. Internal Facebook documents revealed that the platform's algorithm assigned the "angry" emoji five times the weight of the "like" emoji, engineering users' exposure to inflammatory content. This design creates incentives for content creators to produce increasingly provocative material, generating cycles of outrage that benefit platform profits while harming public discourse. The collapse of traditional gatekeeping functions represents another technological vulnerability. Before digital media, professional journalists and editors served as imperfect but important filters, applying standards of evidence and relevance to information before it reached mass audiences. Today, anyone can publish content potentially reaching millions without passing through these quality controls. Without professional filters separating fact from fiction, conspiracy theories and fringe views find fertile ground online. The economic pressures that have decimated local journalism have exacerbated this problem, creating information vacuums easily filled by partisan sources and disinformation. Microtargeting capabilities provide unprecedented opportunities for manipulation through personalized messaging. Political campaigns and disinformation actors can now deliver precisely tailored content to narrow demographic slices based on psychological profiles derived from vast amounts of personal data. This targeting allows manipulators to exploit specific vulnerabilities in different communities, delivering contradictory messages to different groups without the inconsistencies being readily apparent. These targeted messages often remain invisible to broader audiences or fact-checkers, creating what researchers call "filter bubbles" where false narratives can flourish without challenge. The anonymity afforded by digital platforms enables deception at scale. Many social media platforms allow users to post content without using their real identities, creating opportunities for impersonation and manipulation. During the 2016 US presidential election, the Russian Internet Research Agency exploited this feature by creating fictitious accounts with names like "Blacktivist" and "Heart of Texas" that attracted hundreds of thousands of followers while spreading divisive content. Without reliable ways to verify the authenticity of online personas, users struggle to evaluate the credibility of information sources. Artificial intelligence represents the most alarming frontier in digital disinformation. Generative AI systems can now produce remarkably persuasive content—including text, images, audio, and video—that appears authentic but is entirely fabricated. These systems can generate "plausibly realistic and targeted content, including news articles, tweets, dialogue, and emails" at unprecedented scale and sophistication. As these technologies become more accessible, the potential for creating personalized, highly convincing disinformation grows exponentially, threatening to undermine the very concept of evidence in public discourse.

Chapter 4: America's Constitutional Weaknesses: Freedom Exploited

The United States possesses unique vulnerabilities to disinformation that stem from our most cherished constitutional values and protections. The same freedoms that define American democracy create openings that malicious actors can exploit to spread falsehoods and undermine democratic institutions. As Richard Stengel notes, "Disinformation is especially hard for us to fight because our adversaries use our strengths—our openness, our free press, our commitment to free speech—against us." The First Amendment's robust protection of free speech creates a constitutional environment exceptionally hospitable to disinformation. Unlike many democracies that have enacted laws against hate speech, deliberate falsehoods, or foreign political interference, American jurisprudence has consistently prioritized free expression over content regulation. Supreme Court decisions have established high standards for proving defamation, particularly regarding public figures, and limited restrictions on speech to only the most imminent threats of violence. While these protections serve vital democratic purposes, they also create a legal environment where deliberately false and harmful speech often receives constitutional protection. American defamation laws further enable disinformation by setting a high bar for legal accountability. To square with First Amendment protections, courts require public officials or public figures to prove not only that claims about them are false but that they were made with "actual malice"—knowledge of falsity or reckless disregard for the truth. While this standard protects journalists from liability for honest mistakes, it also means there is often no recourse when anonymous users spread falsehoods that are then unwittingly amplified by others. This legal framework makes it extraordinarily difficult to hold disinformation purveyors accountable through civil litigation. Campaign finance laws, particularly following the Citizens United decision, have opened the door to "dark money" that funds political messaging without transparency. Super PACs can raise and spend unlimited amounts to support candidates, creating the misleading impression that certain causes or candidates are more popular or reviled than they actually are. The lack of disclosure requirements for online political advertising creates additional vulnerabilities, allowing influence operators to buy ads that make false claims without revealing who is behind them. This opacity makes it difficult for voters to evaluate the credibility and motivations of political messaging. America's capitalist economic system has created vulnerabilities through its prioritization of innovation over regulation. Section 230 of the Communications Decency Act provides "safe harbor" from legal liability for online platforms, allowing them to avoid responsibility when users post harmful content. While this protection has fostered technological innovation, it has also enabled the proliferation of disinformation without accountability. Treating social media platforms as neutral conduits rather than publishers has allowed them to profit from engagement-driven algorithms that amplify false content without bearing responsibility for the societal consequences. The federal government's reluctance to investigate matters that implicate free speech or assembly creates another blind spot. Following revelations about FBI abuses in the 1970s, important reforms were implemented to protect civil liberties. However, these safeguards may have contributed to the failure to identify threats before the January 6 attack, despite numerous social media posts indicating it was coming. When the Department of Homeland Security attempted to create a Disinformation Governance Board in 2022, critics immediately labeled it an "Orwellian Ministry of Truth," forcing its disbandment within weeks. This resistance to government involvement in addressing disinformation creates significant gaps in the national response.

Chapter 5: Electoral Systems Under Attack: Democracy's Vulnerability

Disinformation poses an existential threat to democracy by undermining the integrity of elections and eroding public confidence in democratic processes. When voters cannot distinguish truth from lies, they lose faith that their vote matters, creating conditions for authoritarian takeover. The persistent claims of "rigged" elections exemplify this threat, beginning before the 2016 presidential election and intensifying after the 2020 contest. Despite the failure of sixty-one court challenges, extensive audits, and investigations that found no evidence of significant fraud, millions of Americans continue to believe the election was stolen. This disinformation campaign has evolved from gathering "under the banner of 'Stop the Steal'" to adopting "the good government language of 'election integrity.'" Under this pretext, many states have enacted laws that make voting more difficult, particularly for likely Democratic voters—students, people of color, and economically disadvantaged communities. These voter suppression laws include restrictions on voting by mail, stringent photo ID requirements, and purges of voter rolls, all of which disproportionately impact minority communities. The pattern mirrors historical efforts to disenfranchise Black voters after Reconstruction, using seemingly neutral measures to achieve discriminatory outcomes. Even more alarming, disinformation about election fraud has been used to justify interference with the machinery of elections themselves. Some states have passed laws shifting power from local election officials to partisan state legislatures. In Georgia, for example, the legislature removed the secretary of state as chair of the State Election Board after Brad Raffensperger refused to "find" votes to overturn the election results. The new law also empowered the board to suspend county election officials, potentially allowing partisan interference in election administration. These structural changes threaten the independence and professionalism of election administration. MAGA Republicans have used false claims of fraud to justify third-party audits and the inspection of voting machines, endangering the integrity of election infrastructure. In Arizona, the Republican-controlled Senate hired Cyber Ninjas, a firm with clear partisan ties, to conduct an "audit" that ultimately found no fraud but nevertheless damaged public confidence in the electoral process. In multiple states, unauthorized individuals have gained access to voting equipment, creating opportunities for tampering and insider attacks in future elections. These breaches compromise the security and reliability of voting systems. Perhaps most concerning, election deniers have targeted official positions that control the oversight of elections. In 2022, nearly 300 coup supporters ran for office across the country, including candidates for secretary of state who pledged to eliminate mail-in ballots and "clean up" voter rolls. While voters rejected many of these candidates in key battleground states, 170 election deniers won their races, placing them in positions to potentially undermine future elections. As Trump himself noted, sometimes "the vote counter is more important than the candidate," highlighting the vulnerability of electoral systems to manipulation from within. This systematic assault on democratic institutions follows a pattern seen in other countries where democracy has declined from within. In Hungary, Viktor Orbán has maintained power by replacing civil servants with partisan allies, rewriting the constitution, and manipulating election laws. Through these incremental changes, he has transformed Hungary from a democracy to what many observers consider a competitive authoritarian regime. Similar efforts in the United States threaten to erode democratic norms and institutions gradually, potentially leading to a system where elections are held but their outcomes are predetermined through structural manipulation.

Chapter 6: Violence and Division: The Real-World Consequences

Disinformation poses grave threats to public safety and national security by fueling harassment, threats, and acts of violence. The January 6 attack on the U.S. Capitol represents the most dramatic example of how disinformation can incite violence. Thousands of Americans, convinced by false claims that the election had been stolen, stormed the seat of government in an attempt to prevent the peaceful transfer of power. This insurrection resulted in multiple deaths, hundreds of injuries to law enforcement officers, and millions of dollars in damage to the Capitol building. The phenomenon known as "stochastic terrorism" explains how inflammatory rhetoric leads to predictable but seemingly random acts of violence. When prominent figures use their platforms to demonize others, they may not explicitly call for attacks, but violence becomes a foreseeable consequence of their words. As homeland security expert Juliette Kayyem defines it, stochastic terrorism is "the incitement of random but utterly predictable acts of violence for political gain." This dynamic was clearly at work when Trump urged supporters to "fight like hell" and they responded by violently storming the Capitol. Public officials have increasingly become targets of threats and harassment fueled by disinformation. Michigan Secretary of State Jocelyn Benson faced an armed mob outside her home demanding she overturn the 2020 election results. Election workers across the country have reported receiving death threats, leading many to resign their positions. The attack on Paul Pelosi, husband of then-Speaker Nancy Pelosi, came after years of demonization targeting his wife. These incidents demonstrate how rhetoric that portrays political opponents as enemies of the people can inspire real-world violence against individuals. Disinformation that people of color are "replacing" white Americans has sparked hate crimes against various minority communities. The perpetrators of mass shootings at a Pittsburgh synagogue in 2018, an El Paso Walmart in 2019, and a Buffalo supermarket in 2022 were all motivated by the "Great Replacement" theory, a conspiracy claiming that elites are deliberately importing immigrants to dilute white voting power. This dangerous narrative has moved from the fringes to mainstream political discourse, with some Republican politicians and media figures openly promoting versions of it, contributing to a climate of fear and hostility toward minority groups. Beyond these immediate threats to public safety, disinformation also endangers national security by weakening America's standing in the world. Once the model democracy for the world, the United States is now ridiculed for its dysfunction. Enemies of democracy point to the chaos following the 2020 election as proof that our system of government is a failed experiment. This diminished reputation undermines America's ability to promote democratic values globally and strengthens the hand of authoritarian regimes seeking to expand their influence in a competitive international environment. Disinformation also subverts our ability to address other critical national challenges. When significant portions of the population distrust scientific expertise on issues like climate change or public health, it becomes nearly impossible to forge the consensus needed for effective action. During the COVID-19 pandemic, disinformation about vaccines and masks contributed to unnecessary deaths and prolonged the crisis. Similar dynamics play out regarding climate change, where false claims that it is a "hoax" have delayed crucial mitigation efforts, threatening long-term national security through increased natural disasters, resource conflicts, and migration pressures.

Chapter 7: Building Resilience: Strategies to Protect Democratic Discourse

Addressing the disinformation crisis requires multifaceted approaches that protect democratic values while countering harmful falsehoods. Unlike authoritarian regimes that simply censor unwanted information, democracies must develop solutions that preserve free expression while promoting information integrity. Effective strategies must target both the supply and demand sides of the disinformation ecosystem. Media literacy education represents one of the most promising long-term strategies for building societal resilience. Research shows that people trained to identify common manipulation tactics become significantly more resistant to disinformation. Finland has pioneered this approach, integrating media literacy throughout its educational curriculum from elementary school through university. The results have been impressive—Finnish citizens demonstrate greater resistance to disinformation campaigns despite the country's proximity to Russia, a major source of international disinformation. Similar programs adapted to American educational contexts could build population-wide resilience while respecting diverse viewpoints. Platform design modifications offer another promising avenue that avoids direct content regulation. Research indicates that simple interventions—such as prompting users to consider accuracy before sharing content, adding friction to the sharing process, or providing greater context around sources—can significantly reduce the spread of false information without restricting speech. These "nudges" work with human psychology rather than against it, making it easier for users to engage thoughtfully with information. Similarly, algorithmic transparency requirements would allow independent researchers to identify and address patterns that systematically amplify misleading content. Strengthening local journalism could help fill information vacuums that disinformation exploits. When communities lack reliable local news sources, residents become more dependent on national media and social media for information, increasing their exposure to partisan content and disinformation. Government subsidies, tax incentives for nonprofit news organizations, and philanthropic support could help rebuild local news ecosystems. Public education campaigns could also encourage citizens to support local journalism through subscriptions and donations, creating sustainable models for accurate community information. Electoral system reforms can directly address vulnerabilities exploited by disinformation campaigns. Nonpartisan election administration, transparent voting processes, and clear communication about normal election procedures can prevent the uncertainty that disinformation exploits. Several states have successfully implemented independent redistricting commissions and professional election administration systems that build public confidence through transparency rather than partisan control. Similarly, campaign finance transparency requirements would allow voters to evaluate the credibility of political messaging by revealing its sources. Strategic counter-messaging represents another important tool when implemented with careful attention to psychological principles. Research shows that simple fact-checking often fails to counter disinformation, particularly when it contradicts strongly held beliefs. More effective approaches focus on providing alternative narratives that acknowledge legitimate concerns while offering accurate information. This "truth sandwich" approach—beginning and ending with accurate information while briefly addressing the falsehood—has proven more effective than simple debunking. When combined with proactive communication about anticipated disinformation themes, this strategy can inoculate communities against predictable falsehoods. Legal accountability, while challenging under First Amendment constraints, remains an important component of comprehensive solutions. Existing laws against fraud, defamation, and incitement can be more vigorously enforced without creating new speech restrictions. Civil litigation has already demonstrated effectiveness in holding some disinformation purveyors accountable, as seen in successful defamation suits against those who spread false claims about election systems. Similarly, transparency requirements for political advertising and foreign agent registration can be strengthened without restricting content.

Summary

Disinformation represents not merely a challenge to factual accuracy but a fundamental threat to democratic governance itself. When citizens cannot distinguish truth from falsehood, they become vulnerable to manipulation by both domestic and foreign actors seeking to undermine democratic institutions. The technological, psychological, and social factors that enable disinformation's spread require equally sophisticated and multidimensional responses that balance addressing genuine harms with preserving essential freedoms. The path forward demands strengthening democratic resilience through education, institutional reform, and technological innovation rather than censorship or authoritarian control. By empowering citizens through media literacy, supporting quality journalism, implementing thoughtful platform design, and enforcing existing accountability mechanisms, democracies can preserve the information ecosystem necessary for self-governance. The ultimate goal must be not the elimination of all false information—an impossible and potentially dangerous objective—but rather the cultivation of a society where truth has a fighting chance in the marketplace of ideas, and where citizens possess the tools to make informed judgments about the information they encounter.

About Author

Loading...

Barbara McQuade

Read more