Becoming Attached

Becoming Attached Plot Summary

Introduction

In the aftermath of World War II, as Europe grappled with thousands of orphaned and displaced children, a British psychiatrist named John Bowlby began questioning the prevailing wisdom about child development. At a time when the dominant psychological theories emphasized feeding as the primary bond between mother and child, and when parents were routinely advised against "spoiling" infants with too much attention, Bowlby's observations led him in a radically different direction. Working with institutionalized children who had been separated from their families, he noticed patterns of emotional detachment and disturbance that couldn't be explained by existing theories. This recognition would launch him on a path to developing one of the most influential frameworks in developmental psychology—attachment theory. Bowlby's revolutionary insight was deceptively simple yet profoundly transformative: humans are born with an innate biological need to form close emotional bonds with caregivers, and the quality of these early relationships shapes development throughout life. This perspective challenged the foundations of psychoanalytic thinking, behaviorism, and conventional childcare practices of his era. Through his work, we witness not only the evolution of a groundbreaking theory but also a compelling human story of intellectual courage—how one man's willingness to trust his observations over established doctrine transformed our understanding of human emotional development and ultimately changed how society values the bond between parent and child.

Chapter 1: Early Life and Intellectual Foundations

John Bowlby was born in 1907 into a privileged British family, the son of a prominent surgeon who served the royal household. Despite material comfort, his emotional landscape was shaped by the upper-class British childrearing practices of the era—he was primarily raised by a nanny, seeing his parents for only brief periods each day. At age seven, following the custom of his social class, he was sent to boarding school, an experience he later privately described as traumatic. These early separations from attachment figures, though considered normal in his social context, would later inform his revolutionary theories about the importance of continuous caregiving relationships. After studying medicine at Cambridge University, Bowlby found himself increasingly drawn to psychology and psychiatry. A pivotal experience came during his early twenties when he volunteered at a school for maladjusted children. There, he encountered troubled youngsters whose behavioral problems seemed clearly connected to their disrupted family relationships. One child in particular caught his attention—an affectionless, isolated teenager who had experienced multiple caregivers and no stable parental figure. This and similar cases convinced the young Bowlby that actual experiences, not just fantasies as Freudian theory suggested, played a crucial role in psychological development. Bowlby's professional training took place within the psychoanalytic tradition, where he studied under Melanie Klein, a dominant figure in British psychoanalysis. However, he soon found himself at odds with the prevailing psychoanalytic emphasis on internal fantasy life over actual experiences. When Klein instructed him not to speak with the mother of a troubled child he was treating, suggesting that the child's problems stemmed from internal conflicts rather than family dynamics, Bowlby was deeply troubled. This incident crystallized his growing conviction that real-life relationships, particularly early ones, profoundly shaped development. The intellectual foundations for attachment theory began to take shape when Bowlby encountered the work of Konrad Lorenz on imprinting in geese. Lorenz had demonstrated that newly hatched goslings would follow and bond with the first moving object they encountered—typically their mother, but sometimes Lorenz himself if he was present at hatching. This research suggested that attachment behaviors might have evolutionary roots independent of feeding, contradicting the dominant "secondary drive" theory that infants became attached to mothers simply because they provided food. For Bowlby, this was a revelation that offered scientific support for his growing conviction about the primacy of the attachment relationship. World War II provided Bowlby with further evidence for his developing ideas. As consultant psychiatrist to the British Army, he observed how soldiers maintained morale through close bonds with their comrades. More significantly, the war created a natural experiment in maternal separation as thousands of children were evacuated from London during the Blitz. The psychological impact of these separations, even when children's physical needs were well met, reinforced Bowlby's belief in the critical importance of emotional bonds. By the war's end, he was poised to challenge the psychological establishment with a new understanding of human development centered on the fundamental need for secure attachment.

Chapter 2: Challenging Psychoanalytic Orthodoxy

When Bowlby began formulating his ideas in the late 1940s, he faced a psychological establishment firmly entrenched in two dominant paradigms: Freudian psychoanalysis and behaviorism. Both, in different ways, minimized the importance of actual parent-child relationships. Freudians emphasized internal fantasies and drives, while behaviorists reduced attachment to a learned association—children became attached to mothers because they provided food and other reinforcements. Bowlby's insistence that attachment was a primary biological need, not derived from feeding or other physical needs, represented a fundamental challenge to both schools of thought. The conflict came to a head in 1957 when Bowlby presented his paper "The Nature of the Child's Tie to His Mother" to the British Psychoanalytic Society. The response was hostile, with Anna Freud and Melanie Klein's followers launching a coordinated attack on his ideas. They accused him of biological reductionism, of abandoning the psychoanalytic emphasis on fantasy, and of failing to appreciate the complexity of the child's internal world. One colleague who had previously been friendly distributed copies of Bowlby's paper to Klein's followers before the presentation, allowing them to prepare their criticisms in advance. This professional rejection was personally painful for Bowlby, who had trained as a psychoanalyst and valued many aspects of psychoanalytic thinking. Rather than retreating in the face of this opposition, Bowlby sought new intellectual allies outside psychoanalysis. He found them in the emerging field of ethology—the scientific study of animal behavior in natural environments. Konrad Lorenz's work on imprinting and Harry Harlow's famous experiments with rhesus monkeys provided crucial support for Bowlby's position. Harlow demonstrated that infant monkeys preferred a soft, cloth "mother" that provided no food over a wire "mother" that did provide food, directly contradicting the "cupboard love" theory of attachment. These findings from animal research gave Bowlby scientific evidence that attachment was indeed a primary biological need, not secondary to feeding. Bowlby's willingness to draw on multiple disciplines was revolutionary for his time. He integrated insights from ethology, evolutionary theory, control systems theory, and cognitive psychology to build a comprehensive framework for understanding attachment. This interdisciplinary approach allowed him to move beyond the limitations of any single perspective and to develop a theory that accounted for both biological and psychological aspects of human development. His three-volume work "Attachment and Loss," published between 1969 and 1980, synthesized these diverse influences into a coherent theoretical framework that transformed developmental psychology. The price of this intellectual independence was professional isolation. For many years, Bowlby was marginalized within the psychoanalytic community, his work ignored or dismissed by many of his colleagues. He later described himself as having been "the nonperson of psychoanalysis" during this period. Yet this very isolation freed him to develop his ideas without the constraints of psychoanalytic orthodoxy. By challenging the prevailing wisdom and following the evidence wherever it led, Bowlby exemplified the kind of intellectual courage that drives scientific progress. His willingness to stand against the established theories of his time ultimately led to one of the most significant paradigm shifts in our understanding of human development.

Chapter 3: The Maternal Deprivation Studies

In 1949, the World Health Organization commissioned Bowlby to prepare a report on the mental health of homeless children in post-war Europe. This assignment provided him with the opportunity to synthesize existing research on the effects of maternal separation and to present his emerging ideas to a global audience. The resulting report, "Maternal Care and Mental Health," published in 1951, became one of the most influential documents in the history of developmental psychology. In it, Bowlby reviewed studies of children in hospitals, orphanages, and other institutional settings, documenting the devastating psychological effects of separation from primary caregivers. The evidence Bowlby compiled was striking in its consistency. Children raised in institutions without stable mother figures showed similar patterns of emotional disturbance: superficial relationships, lack of concentration, inability to feel deeply for others, and in many cases, delinquent behavior. Particularly alarming were studies of infants in foundling homes who, despite adequate nutrition and medical care, failed to thrive physically. Some became listless and withdrawn, while others died from what appeared to be emotional deprivation. Bowlby concluded that "mother-love in infancy and childhood is as important for mental health as are vitamins and proteins for physical health." To document the immediate effects of separation, Bowlby collaborated with James Robertson, a social worker who had trained with Anna Freud. Robertson filmed young children who were separated from their parents during hospitalization, creating powerful visual evidence of their distress. His film "A Two-Year-Old Goes to Hospital" showed how Laura, a previously secure and happy child, progressed through stages of protest (crying and calling for her mother), despair (quiet withdrawal and hopelessness), and finally detachment (a superficial adjustment that masked emotional disconnection). When her mother finally returned after eight days, Laura turned away, unable to reconnect immediately—a response that contradicted the prevailing belief that children quickly "adjusted" to separation. These maternal deprivation studies had immediate practical implications. They led to changes in hospital policies, with many institutions beginning to allow parents to stay with their hospitalized children rather than restricting visits. Orphanages and children's homes began to emphasize continuity of care and emotional relationships rather than just physical needs. The WHO report, published as a popular book titled "Child Care and the Growth of Love," sold over half a million copies and influenced childcare practices worldwide. For the first time, scientific evidence supported what many parents intuitively understood—that children needed not just physical care but loving, continuous relationships for healthy development. Critics argued that Bowlby had overemphasized the mother's role and ignored other factors like poverty, father absence, and genetic predispositions. Some feminists later viewed his work as placing undue pressure on mothers to remain at home with their children. However, Bowlby maintained that what mattered was not who provided care but the quality and continuity of the relationship. His focus on mothers reflected the social reality of his time, when mothers were typically the primary caregivers. Later researchers would confirm that children could form secure attachments to fathers, grandparents, or other consistent caregivers who responded sensitively to their needs. The maternal deprivation studies represented a crucial bridge between Bowlby's clinical observations and his developing theoretical framework. They provided empirical support for his conviction that early relationships profoundly affected development and helped shift the focus of child psychology from internal fantasies to actual experiences. By documenting the real suffering of separated children, these studies gave emotional weight to what might otherwise have remained abstract theoretical concepts, helping to catalyze changes in how society treated its most vulnerable members.

Chapter 4: Collaboration with Mary Ainsworth

The partnership between John Bowlby and Mary Ainsworth stands as one of the most productive collaborations in the history of psychology. They first met in 1950 when Ainsworth, who had been working on security theory at the University of Toronto, joined Bowlby's research team at the Tavistock Clinic. Though she remained in London for only four years before moving to Uganda with her husband, this brief period established a connection that would continue through correspondence and occasional meetings for the next four decades. Ainsworth brought crucial methodological rigor to attachment theory. While Bowlby provided the theoretical framework, Ainsworth developed systematic observational techniques that could empirically test his ideas. During her time in Uganda, she conducted a pioneering naturalistic study of twenty-six mother-infant pairs, visiting each home every two weeks for nine months. These detailed observations revealed infants developing attachment behaviors just as Bowlby had theorized, but also showed significant individual differences in the quality of these attachments. Some babies used their mothers as a secure base for exploration, confidently venturing out and returning for emotional refueling. Others seemed anxious, either clinging excessively or showing little emotional connection. After moving to Baltimore in 1955, Ainsworth launched her landmark study that would revolutionize attachment research. Building on her Uganda observations, she developed the "Strange Situation" procedure—a structured laboratory assessment where an infant's reactions to separations and reunions with the mother are observed. This elegant twenty-minute procedure revealed three distinct patterns of attachment: secure, anxious-ambivalent, and anxious-avoidant. Most importantly, these patterns correlated with maternal behavior observed in home visits months earlier. Mothers of securely attached infants had consistently responded sensitively to their babies' signals, while mothers of anxiously attached infants had been either rejecting or inconsistent. The collaboration between Bowlby and Ainsworth exemplified how theory and research could inform each other. Bowlby's theoretical insights guided Ainsworth's research questions, while her empirical findings refined and extended his theoretical framework. For example, Ainsworth's discovery of different attachment patterns led Bowlby to develop more nuanced ideas about internal working models and defensive processes. They maintained a regular correspondence, sharing manuscripts and offering feedback on each other's work. Bowlby acknowledged Ainsworth's contributions by dedicating his final book, "A Secure Base," to her. Their partnership was characterized by mutual respect and complementary strengths. Bowlby, with his medical background and theoretical orientation, excelled at synthesizing ideas from multiple disciplines into a coherent framework. Ainsworth, trained as a developmental psychologist with expertise in assessment, brought precision and empirical validation to these theoretical concepts. Together, they created a comprehensive approach to understanding attachment that was both theoretically sophisticated and empirically grounded, establishing a foundation that continues to influence research and practice today.

Chapter 5: The Strange Situation and Empirical Validation

The Strange Situation procedure, developed by Mary Ainsworth in the late 1960s, transformed attachment from an abstract concept to a measurable phenomenon, providing crucial empirical validation for Bowlby's theoretical claims. This carefully designed laboratory procedure unfolds over twenty minutes as a mother and her one-year-old child experience a series of separations and reunions in an unfamiliar room, sometimes with a stranger present. What makes this method so powerful is not the separations themselves, but how the child responds when the mother returns—a response that reveals the quality of the attachment relationship. Through meticulous observation, Ainsworth identified three distinct patterns of attachment. Securely attached infants (about 65% in middle-class American samples) showed distress when their mothers left but greeted them warmly upon return, seeking and receiving comfort if upset before returning to exploration. Anxious-ambivalent infants (about 10-15%) became extremely distressed during separations and showed conflicted behaviors upon reunion—seeking contact while simultaneously showing anger through hitting or pushing away. Most surprising were the anxious-avoidant infants (about 20-25%) who showed little distress when mother left and actively avoided or ignored her upon return, often turning away or moving past her when she attempted to make contact. What made these classifications meaningful was their connection to home observations. Before conducting the Strange Situation, Ainsworth had spent hundreds of hours observing these same mother-infant pairs in their natural environment. She discovered that mothers of securely attached infants were consistently responsive to their babies' signals, while mothers of anxiously attached infants were either rejecting (leading to avoidance) or inconsistent (leading to ambivalence). The laboratory behavior wasn't random—it reflected the history of the relationship and the child's expectations based on that history. The Strange Situation quickly became the gold standard for assessing attachment quality and has been used in thousands of studies worldwide. Its reliability across cultures and its predictive validity for later development have made it one of the most robust assessment tools in developmental psychology. Longitudinal studies, particularly those conducted by Alan Sroufe and colleagues at the University of Minnesota, demonstrated that early attachment classifications predicted numerous aspects of later development, including peer relationships, emotional regulation, and resilience in the face of stress. Cross-cultural research using the Strange Situation revealed both universals and cultural variations in attachment patterns. Studies in Germany, Japan, Israel, and various African countries confirmed that secure attachment was associated with sensitive caregiving across cultures, though the specific behaviors that constituted "sensitivity" might vary according to cultural norms. The distribution of attachment patterns also varied, with German samples showing higher rates of avoidant attachment and Japanese samples higher rates of ambivalent attachment, reflecting cultural differences in parenting practices and values. The empirical validation provided by the Strange Situation and subsequent research transformed attachment theory from a controversial hypothesis to a well-established framework with substantial scientific support. By demonstrating that attachment patterns were not fixed by genetics but shaped by the quality of caregiving, this research offered hope that intervention could improve outcomes for children at risk. It also extended Bowlby's insights beyond infancy, showing how early attachment experiences created templates for later relationships that could persist throughout life unless modified by new relationship experiences.

Chapter 6: Attachment Theory's Global Impact

The impact of attachment theory extends far beyond academic psychology, influencing fields as diverse as medicine, education, social work, and public policy. Perhaps its most immediate effect was on hospital practices for children. Before Bowlby and Robertson's work, parents were often restricted to brief visiting hours based on concerns about infection control and hospital efficiency. Their films documenting children's distress during separation helped transform these policies, with hospitals gradually allowing and even encouraging parents to stay with their hospitalized children. Today, family-centered care is standard practice in pediatric settings worldwide, a direct legacy of attachment research. In childcare and early education, attachment theory has fundamentally altered how we approach the care of young children. Quality childcare programs now emphasize the importance of consistent caregivers who form meaningful relationships with children rather than interchangeable staff. The concept of "primary caregiving," where each child in a daycare setting is assigned a specific caregiver who takes special responsibility for that child's emotional needs, directly applies attachment principles to group care settings. Programs like Head Start incorporate parent involvement components based on the understanding that supporting the parent-child relationship is as important as direct education. The field of infant mental health, virtually non-existent before Bowlby and Ainsworth, now flourishes as a distinct specialty. Professionals in this field work to support healthy attachments from the earliest days of life, recognizing that prevention is more effective than later intervention. Programs like home visiting for new parents and infant-parent psychotherapy aim to break intergenerational cycles of insecure attachment and promote optimal development. The understanding that early relationships shape brain development has led to increased investment in early intervention programs worldwide. In clinical psychology and psychiatry, attachment theory has revolutionized the treatment of childhood disorders and trauma. Therapies like Child-Parent Psychotherapy and Circle of Security focus on enhancing the security of the parent-child attachment as a pathway to addressing behavioral and emotional problems. For adults, attachment-based therapies help individuals understand how their early relationship experiences continue to influence their current relationships, offering a path to greater security and satisfaction in intimate connections. The concept of "earned security"—that new relationship experiences can modify internal working models formed in childhood—offers hope for healing even after difficult early experiences. On a broader social level, attachment theory has influenced how we think about human nature itself. Against the individualistic ethos that dominated much of 20th-century psychology, Bowlby insisted that humans are fundamentally relational beings. Our need for secure emotional connections is not a sign of weakness or immaturity but a biological imperative as basic as our need for food and shelter. This perspective has helped legitimize the importance of emotional support throughout life and challenged the notion that independence should be our primary developmental goal. As neuroscience advances, Bowlby's insights continue to find validation in research showing how early relationships literally shape the developing brain, influencing stress reactivity, emotional regulation, and social cognition throughout life.

Chapter 7: Legacy in Modern Psychology

John Bowlby died in 1990, having lived long enough to see his once-controversial ideas gain widespread acceptance. Today, attachment theory stands as one of the most influential frameworks in developmental psychology, with applications extending far beyond the parent-child relationship that was its original focus. The concept of the "secure base," first observed by Ainsworth in Uganda, has proven particularly fertile. It suggests that the quality of our earliest attachments shapes our ability to explore the world with confidence, to form healthy relationships, and to regulate our emotions effectively. In developmental psychology, attachment has become a fundamental concept for understanding socioemotional development across the lifespan. Researchers have extended Bowlby's work to examine attachment in adolescence, romantic relationships, and even workplace dynamics. The concept of "internal working models"—mental representations of self and others formed through early attachment experiences—has provided a framework for understanding how early relationships shape later social cognition and behavior. Longitudinal studies following individuals from infancy to adulthood have confirmed many of Bowlby's predictions about the enduring influence of early attachment experiences. The integration of attachment theory with neuroscience represents one of the most exciting developments in modern psychology. Brain imaging studies reveal how early relationships literally shape the developing nervous system, influencing stress reactivity, emotional regulation, and social cognition. The field of interpersonal neurobiology, pioneered by Daniel Siegel and others, explores how secure attachment relationships promote neural integration and optimal brain development. These findings provide biological validation for many of Bowlby's theoretical claims and help explain the mechanisms through which early relationships exert such profound and lasting effects. Attachment theory has also transformed our understanding of trauma and resilience. Research shows that secure attachment relationships serve as powerful protective factors against adversity, helping children develop the emotional resources to cope with stress and recover from difficult experiences. Conversely, insecure attachment can increase vulnerability to trauma, as children lack the emotional regulation skills and sense of security needed to process frightening experiences. This understanding has led to trauma-informed approaches in schools, healthcare settings, and social services that recognize the central role of relationships in both causing and healing psychological wounds. Perhaps most significantly, attachment theory has changed how we value the emotional bonds between parents and children. Bowlby's work helped legitimize the importance of these relationships at a time when they were often dismissed as sentimental or unimportant. His emphasis on the evolutionary basis of attachment helped people understand that the need for close relationships is not a weakness but a fundamental aspect of human nature. Today, policies regarding parental leave, childcare, foster care, and adoption increasingly reflect an awareness of attachment needs, though implementation remains imperfect. The enduring legacy of Bowlby's work lies in its profound humanizing influence. By scientifically validating the importance of love and emotional connection, he gave legitimacy to what parents intuitively understood but science had previously dismissed. His work reminds us that relationships are not luxury items but biological necessities as essential as food and shelter. In a world increasingly characterized by technological connection but emotional isolation, Bowlby's insights about our fundamental need for secure attachment relationships have never been more relevant or necessary.

Summary

John Bowlby's revolutionary insight—that humans are born with an innate need for close emotional bonds—transformed our understanding of child development and human relationships. Through his partnership with Mary Ainsworth and integration of diverse scientific fields, he created a comprehensive theory that explained how early relationships shape our emotional lives, personality development, and capacity for intimacy. Despite fierce opposition from established psychological schools, his persistence in following the evidence led to a paradigm shift that continues to influence psychology, medicine, education, and childcare practices worldwide. The enduring legacy of Bowlby's work lies in its profound humanizing influence. By scientifically validating the importance of love and emotional connection, he gave legitimacy to what parents intuitively understood but science had previously dismissed. His work reminds us that relationships are not luxury items but biological necessities as essential as food and shelter. For parents, educators, therapists, and policymakers, attachment theory offers a powerful framework for creating environments where children and adults can thrive emotionally. In a world increasingly characterized by disconnection and isolation, Bowlby's insights about our fundamental need for secure attachment have never been more relevant or necessary.

About Author

Loading...

Robert Karen

Read more