It’s Not How Good You Are, It’s How Good You Want to Be

It’s Not How Good You Are, It’s How Good You Want to Be Plot Summary

Introduction

In a world where mediocrity is often more in demand than excellence, what drives us to strive for greatness? This question sits at the heart of creative and professional development. The traditional view that talent determines success is challenged by a more empowering perspective: ambition and desire are the true engines of achievement. This paradigm shift offers a framework for understanding success that transcends natural ability. By examining the relationship between aspiration and accomplishment, we gain insight into why some individuals consistently outperform their seemingly more talented peers. The author presents a practical philosophy that deconstructs success into actionable principles—embracing failure, challenging conventions, strategic self-presentation, and bold decision-making—all unified by the central thesis that one's ceiling is determined not by inherent capabilities but by the height of one's ambitions.

Chapter 1: The Fundamentals of Success: Ambition vs. Talent

The relationship between talent and ambition forms the cornerstone of professional success, but their relative importance is frequently misunderstood. Conventional wisdom often places talent on a pedestal, viewing it as the primary determinant of achievement. However, this perspective is fundamentally flawed. Talent merely establishes a starting point, while ambition determines the trajectory and ultimate destination. Ambition functions as both catalyst and sustaining force. It provides the initial momentum to begin challenging journeys and the persistence required to continue when obstacles arise. The author observes that most wealthy and powerful individuals aren't necessarily the most talented, educated, charming, or attractive—they simply wanted success with greater intensity than their peers. This desire translated into consistent action, learning, and adaptation where others might have surrendered to limitations. The framework distinguishes between different levels of ambition: being quite good, good, very good, the best in your field, or the best in the world. Each level demands corresponding sacrifices and commitments. Many professionals conflate being good with being liked, failing to recognize that greatness often requires making unpopular decisions and standing apart from conventional thinking. This confusion leads many to pursue acceptance rather than excellence. Vision represents perhaps the most valuable asset in this paradigm. Having a clear mental image of where or who you want to be creates a powerful target for your subconscious and conscious efforts. Without this vision, progress becomes aimless, and development stagnates. The author advocates for seemingly unreasonable ambitions, encouraging readers to "develop a complete disregard for where your abilities end" and to attempt what seems impossible. Success comes from aiming beyond perceived capabilities rather than working within comfortable boundaries. This approach creates tension between current reality and desired future—a productive discomfort that drives growth. The framework suggests that school performance often fails to predict life achievement precisely because academic success rewards memorizing established facts, while professional triumph requires imagining what doesn't yet exist.

Chapter 2: Embrace Criticism and Failure as Learning Tools

The traditional approach to feedback seeks validation—we naturally gravitate toward praise and away from criticism. However, this comfort-seeking behavior creates a significant barrier to improvement. The author presents a counterintuitive framework: actively seeking criticism rather than praise. When we ask others what they like about our work, they typically offer pleasant affirmations that rarely challenge our thinking. Conversely, asking "What's wrong with this? How can I make it better?" elicits valuable insights that can transform adequate work into exceptional work. This approach requires restructuring our relationship with responsibility. The framework emphasizes absolute ownership—taking complete responsibility for outcomes regardless of external factors. When things go wrong, common excuses emerge: poor direction, insufficient resources, inadequate time, or difficult clients. The author dismisses these justifications, arguing that obstacles are universal and constant across all work environments. By accepting total responsibility, professionals position themselves to address problems rather than merely explaining them away. Failure, within this paradigm, becomes an essential component of success rather than its opposite. The author references Benjamin Franklin's perspective: "I haven't failed, I've had 10,000 ideas that didn't work." Similarly, Thomas Edison viewed each failed light bulb prototype as providing crucial information for subsequent attempts. The framework distinguishes between failure as endpoint and failure as methodology—the latter being a systematic approach to discovery through elimination of non-viable paths. This concept extends to intellectual flexibility—being "right" often becomes an obstacle to growth. Rightness implies certainty based on past knowledge and experience, creating rigidity that prevents adaptation to changing circumstances. The author argues that being "right" anchors thinking in the past rather than opening possibilities for the future. Experience, paradoxically, can become the enemy of creativity when it constrains exploration to previously successful approaches. The ideal stance involves intellectual humility coupled with bold action—acknowledging limitations while refusing to be constrained by them. Embracing "wrongness" removes artificial barriers to innovation and creates space for unprecedented approaches. This framework doesn't glorify error for its own sake but recognizes that the path to originality necessarily involves ventures into unproven territory where missteps are inevitable components of discovery.

Chapter 3: Break Rules and Challenge Conventional Thinking

The established rules within any field create both structure and limitation. These boundaries develop for valid reasons—efficiency, consistency, risk reduction—but eventually transform from helpful guidelines into restrictive orthodoxy. The author presents a framework for productive rule-breaking that distinguishes between mindless rebellion and strategic innovation. The central premise holds that truly significant breakthroughs occur not by working within established parameters but by questioning their necessity. This approach begins with recognizing when we're playing by invisible rules. Many constraints exist not because they're essential but because they've become habitual or traditional. The author encapsulates this insight with the principle: "If you can't solve a problem, it's because you're playing by the rules." Complex challenges often appear unsolvable precisely because conventional approaches create artificial limitations that obscure potential solutions. By identifying and challenging these unspoken constraints, previously impossible outcomes become achievable. The methodology embraces what might initially appear as "silly ideas." Mental blocks frequently occur because self-censorship eliminates unconventional possibilities before they receive proper consideration. The framework suggests specific techniques for bypassing these blocks: deliberately doing the opposite of what the solution seems to require, or using random external stimuli as inspiration. This intentional illogic disrupts habitual thinking patterns and creates space for novel connections. Implementation of this approach requires comfort with temporary absurdity. The author cites the example of a French wine that achieved international success through an intentionally "daft and inelegant name." The conventional wisdom would have dictated a sophisticated, traditional name—yet breaking this rule created memorable distinctiveness in a crowded market. Similarly, when faced with seemingly impossible client requests, the framework advocates attempting them rather than explaining their impossibility. The principle extends beyond individual problem-solving to organizational culture. Companies that permit and even encourage controlled rule-breaking create environments where innovation flourishes. This doesn't mean abandoning all structure, but rather developing discernment about which rules serve as productive boundaries and which artificially constrain possibilities. The framework positions rule-breaking not as destructive rebellion but as a creative discipline that expands the territory of what's possible.

Chapter 4: Personal Branding: Present Yourself Strategically

How we present ourselves to the world significantly impacts our professional trajectory, often more than our actual capabilities. The author outlines a strategic framework for personal presentation that acknowledges this reality without cynicism. The central insight focuses on perception management: how you perceive yourself fundamentally determines how others perceive you. This creates an opportunity to shape your professional identity through deliberate positioning rather than allowing it to develop haphazardly. The framework begins with understanding that credentials and formal qualifications, while valuable, primarily validate past achievements. Career advancement more often comes through demonstrating future potential. This creates an apparent paradox: people with modest qualifications but strong self-belief frequently outperform those with impressive credentials but limited ambition. The author illustrates this through comparative examples of how the same person can be perceived differently based solely on how they present themselves—a "pump attendant" versus a "petroleum executive." Strategic presentation extends beyond job titles to visual and behavioral elements. The author recounts how Charles Saatchi, when launching his advertising agency, designed corporate stationery to resemble that of a bank and invested a third of his capital in a single full-page advertisement in The Times. These moves transformed perception of his company from "creative boutique" to "established institution." Similarly, in presentations and speeches, the framework advocates focusing on striking visual elements rather than verbal content, as audiences remember visual impressions more reliably than spoken words. The approach requires authenticity balanced with aspiration. Rather than misrepresenting current reality, effective personal branding means embodying the characteristics of your desired future position. This creates a coherent narrative where advancement appears natural rather than forced. The framework acknowledges that this approach may initially feel uncomfortable—like wearing clothes slightly too large—but asserts that growing into this expanded identity is precisely the point. Career setbacks, viewed through this lens, become opportunities for strategic repositioning. The author notes having been fired five times, with each instance ultimately advancing his career. While conventional wisdom treats termination as professional failure, the framework reframes it as potential evidence of initiative and originality—qualities increasingly valued by forward-thinking organizations. This perspective transforms rejection from a terminal verdict into a redirection toward better-fitting opportunities.

Chapter 5: Creative Approaches to Problem Solving

Creativity in problem-solving extends far beyond artistic domains, representing a systematic approach applicable to challenges in any field. The author presents a framework that demystifies the creative process, positioning it as a learnable skill rather than an innate talent. This approach begins by addressing mental blocks—the habitual patterns that prevent us from seeing novel solutions to familiar problems. The methodology emphasizes breaking established patterns through intentional disruption. When facing creative stagnation, changing tools can liberate thinking—switching from digital to analog methods, from precision instruments to expressive ones. The author recounts converting a modest budget into a substantially larger one simply by presenting a watercolor storyboard instead of the expected computer layout. This change in medium created a distinctive impression that transcended the actual content, demonstrating how process modification can yield unexpected advantages. A critical component involves distinguishing between polished execution and effective communication. Counter-intuitively, rough layouts often sell ideas more successfully than highly refined presentations. When clients view meticulously detailed work, they focus on specific elements rather than the core concept—critiquing a model's appearance or the color scheme rather than evaluating the fundamental idea. Conversely, sketches and rough concepts engage the client's imagination, creating collaborative involvement rather than passive judgment. The framework challenges the common habit of looking for the "next opportunity" while neglecting current projects. Professionals frequently dismiss immediate tasks as unworthy of their best efforts, promising themselves they'll excel on future assignments. This pattern creates a perpetual deferral of excellence. The author advises treating whatever is currently on your desk as the opportunity, regardless of its apparent limitations. This approach transforms mundane assignments into creative challenges and opportunities for exceptional work. Implementation requires identifying and dramatizing what's right about a situation rather than focusing on limitations. The author describes this as finding the essential truth in an idea and then extending it—like accepting that a horse can jump a ditch, therefore imagining it might jump the Grand Canyon. This principle allows for dramatic exaggeration while maintaining conceptual integrity. Rather than being constrained by literal reality, the approach leverages the elasticity of ideas to create compelling narratives that remain psychologically believable despite physical impossibility.

Chapter 6: Effective Client Communication and Relationships

The relationship between creative professionals and clients frequently becomes adversarial, with each side perceiving the other as an obstacle to success. The author presents a framework for transforming these interactions into productive partnerships by understanding underlying motivations and developing strategic communication approaches. This begins with recognizing that the stated objectives in client briefs often differ significantly from unstated personal motivations. Most clients operate within corporate structures where job security takes precedence over creative risk-taking. While officially requesting innovative work, their unstated priority may be avoiding career-threatening failures. The framework advocates investigating clients' personal aspirations—whether joining exclusive clubs, gaining industry recognition, or advancing to specific positions—as these motivations frequently influence decision-making more than official project parameters. The author illustrates this through a government advertising project where the team created excellent work addressing youth unemployment, only to discover the minister's primary objective was generating publicity about his spending rather than solving the social problem. Communication strategy should acknowledge client expectations while creating space for creative alternatives. When clients have preconceived notions about solutions, showing only your preferred approach typically results in rejection. The framework suggests presenting the client's expected solution first, followed by alternative approaches. This sequence satisfies the client's need for familiarity before introducing novelty, creating psychological safety that enables more open consideration of creative options. Persistence becomes a crucial element when initial proposals face rejection. The author recounts winning a government account after being eliminated from consideration by creating an entirely new campaign overnight and insisting on presenting it. Rather than accepting rejection as final, the framework encourages respectful but determined advocacy for work you believe in. This approach distinguishes between a client's initial reaction and their ultimate decision, recognizing that meaningful innovation often requires overcoming initial resistance. The methodology extends to addressing seemingly impossible client requests. Rather than explaining why something can't be done, the approach advocates attempting it—even without formal approval or adequate resources. The author cites Orson Welles' development of Citizen Kane, where he used casting funds to shoot full scenes that eventually comprised a third of the finished film. By transforming conceptual proposals into tangible realities, previously theoretical discussions become concrete evaluations, significantly increasing the likelihood of project approval.

Chapter 7: Career Growth Through Bold Decision Making

Career advancement often stalls not through lack of ability but through excessive caution in decision-making. The author presents a framework for professional growth centered on calculated risk-taking and strategic boldness. This approach begins with recognizing that the business world rewards distinctive thinking over conformity, despite organizational pressures that seem to suggest otherwise. The conventional path encourages professionals to minimize mistakes, creating a paradoxical situation where avoiding errors becomes more important than generating achievements. The framework inverts this priority, suggesting that the person who never makes mistakes likely creates nothing of significance. This perspective aligns with Einstein's definition of insanity as "doing the same thing over and over and expecting different results." Professional growth requires venturing beyond established patterns, even when this increases the probability of occasional failure. Implementation involves strategic relationship development with high-performing individuals. The methodology acknowledges that the best people in any field can be difficult—single-minded, uncompromising, and sometimes intimidating. Rather than avoiding these challenging personalities, the framework advocates deliberately seeking them out. When approaching experts with genuine commitment to quality work, their initially forbidding demeanor often transforms into respect and collaboration. The potential for superior outcomes outweighs the discomfort of potential conflict. The approach extends to information sharing—countering the natural instinct to protect ideas and knowledge. The author observes that professionals often behave like schoolchildren shielding their work, fearing others will take credit for their insights. The framework proposes the opposite strategy: giving away everything you know. This counterintuitive approach prevents stagnation by forcing continuous replenishment of knowledge and creating reciprocal relationships where information flows freely. The principle recognizes that ideas aren't personal property but exist "floating by on the ether," with our role being receptivity rather than ownership. Career advancement often requires breaking out of industry bubbles. The author notes that advertising professionals typically derive 90% of their inspiration from other advertising, creating self-referential work that lacks originality. The framework advocates seeking inspiration from unexpected sources outside one's professional domain. Similarly, it suggests caution regarding industry awards, which typically recognize what is fashionable rather than what is truly innovative. The methodology prioritizes authenticity to subject matter over conformity to current trends, positioning this approach as the path to creating timeless rather than merely contemporary work.

Summary

The transformative power of ambition over talent emerges as the central principle that redefines our understanding of success. By shifting focus from innate abilities to aspirational vision, we unlock potential that remains dormant in those who operate within perceived limitations. The framework presented throughout offers a comprehensive approach to professional and creative development that prioritizes bold thinking, strategic presentation, and relentless pursuit of improvement. The ultimate insight transcends specific techniques to offer a fundamental reorientation: your potential is determined not by current capabilities but by the intensity of your desire to improve. This perspective liberates us from the constraints of self-perception while demanding greater responsibility for outcomes. In embracing this philosophy, we discover that the ceiling on our achievement exists primarily in our ambition rather than our ability—making the question not how good we are, but how good we want to be.

About Author

Loading...

Paul Arden

Paul Arden (7 April 1940 – 2 April 2008) was an influential author of several books on advertising and motivation including "Whatever You Think, Think The Opposite" and "It's Not How Good You Are, It's How Good You Want To Be" and a former creative director for Saatchi and Saatchi at the height of their advertising might.In 1987 Arden was appointed executive creative director. He has spent 14 years with the agency, handling accounts of British Airways, Anchor Butter, Toyota, Ryvita, Nivea, Trust House Forte, Alexon Group and Fuji among others. His British Airways campaigns continue to be remembered as one of the greatest advertising campaigns of all time, changing the fortunes of the airline."Arden was the ringmaster behind the whole creative circus that saw British Airways become 'The World's Favourite Airline', The Independent become the new intelligentsia's favourite newspaper, Margaret Thatcher the nation's favourite leader and Silk Cut their favourite fag." Dave Trott, The Independent"Tempestuous advertising director who thought up memorable campaigns for Silk Cut, BA and The Independent" Times OnlineArden chose to leave Saatchi & Saatchi in 1992 but remained a key consultant for the agency until 1995.

Read more