Untapped Leadership

Untapped Leadership Plot Summary

Introduction

Traditional leadership models have predominantly emerged from a limited and homogeneous perspective - one that centers on white male voices while systematically excluding the experiences and wisdom of marginalized groups. This narrow lens has created a fundamental flaw in how we conceptualize, teach, and practice leadership. When examining the foundations of leadership theory, we discover troubling origins in the 19th century "great man theory," which explicitly excluded women and people of color from consideration as potential leaders. While scholarship has evolved since then, the underlying assumptions and biases remain largely intact, perpetuating a leadership paradigm that fails to represent the richness and diversity of human experience. By highlighting the unique capacities and strategies of leaders from underrepresented backgrounds, we gain access to critically important leadership approaches that have been systematically overlooked. These marginalized leaders navigate complex environments where they must operate in "stealth mode," balancing authenticity with professional expectations, and carrying inequitable burdens. Their expertise offers vital insights into contextual agility, purposeful leadership, and creative problem-solving that can benefit all organizations. This exploration not only challenges dominant leadership narratives but also provides practical frameworks for harnessing untapped leadership potential across all levels of society, ultimately creating more resilient, innovative, and equitable workplaces.

Chapter 1: The Problematic Foundation of Traditional Leadership Models

The foundation of contemporary leadership theory can be traced back to the 19th century with the emergence of "great man theory," coined by Scottish writer Thomas Carlyle. This initial framework proposed that leadership was an inherent quality possessed by certain extraordinary men who were born with the wisdom, charisma, and even divine influence necessary to lead. The theory's very name reveals its exclusionary nature - it wasn't simply about great people, but specifically about great men, and furthermore, not all men were considered. The theory emerged during a time when slavery still existed in the United States, women couldn't vote, and social hierarchies were rigidly enforced. This problematic beginning was further cemented by Francis Galton, who in his 1869 work "Hereditary Genius" attempted to scientifically prove that leadership qualities were genetically inherited. Galton, a known eugenicist, studied the lineages of "eminent men" to demonstrate that greatness ran in families, completely ignoring the structural and societal barriers that prevented most of the population from accessing opportunities for leadership. This approach established a dangerous precedent that leadership was determined by birth rather than by circumstance, opportunity, or developed skills. Even as leadership theories evolved, the underlying biases remained. Behavioral theories that emerged in the 1940s from Ohio State University claimed to have "revolutionized" leadership research by identifying task-focused and people-focused behaviors as key leadership dimensions. However, these studies were conducted at a time when Black students weren't even allowed to live on campus. The supposed "revolution" in leadership thinking still excluded the perspectives of people of color and women, continuing to build upon a fundamentally flawed foundation. Situational leadership theories that developed in the 1960s purported to consider context in leadership effectiveness but failed to acknowledge how race, gender, and other marginalized identities might impact those situations. Fred Fiedler's contingency model, for example, examined how much trust and confidence a leader could garner from followers without considering how racial discrimination and bias might affect that process. These theories were developed during the civil rights movement, yet the methodical exclusion of marginalized perspectives persisted. The reemergence of trait theories in recent decades continues this problematic lineage. Modern trait-leadership models, such as Stephen J. Zaccaro's work, list characteristics like agreeableness, extraversion, and creativity as essential leadership traits without acknowledging how marginalized leaders may be prevented from displaying these traits due to hostile environments or how such traits might be misinterpreted through biased lenses. Assessments like the Myers-Briggs Type Indicator, developed with eugenic undertones, further reinforced the notion that certain personality types were inherently better suited for leadership. This historical context reveals how deeply embedded exclusionary practices are in leadership theory and research. Despite claims of scientific rigor, these frameworks remained products of their time, reflecting and reinforcing the social hierarchies they emerged from. By understanding this problematic foundation, we can begin to recognize why current leadership models continue to fall short and why diverse perspectives remain underrepresented in leadership positions across sectors.

Chapter 2: Current Limitations of Leadership Frameworks and Definitions

Contemporary leadership frameworks remain tethered to their problematic origins, perpetuating narrow conceptions that limit our understanding of what effective leadership can be. When examining today's workplaces, we see a striking disparity in representation: as of 2021, women of color account for only 4 percent of C-suite leaders, while across Fortune 500 companies, merely 1.2 percent of CEOs are Black, 4 percent are Latinx, and 8 percent are Asian. These statistics reflect not just hiring biases but a deeper, more systemic issue with how leadership itself is defined, recognized, and valued. The visual symbolism we associate with leadership reveals much about these limitations. We instinctively imagine leadership as triangular structures - pyramids with a narrow top and broad base. This hierarchical imagery positions leadership as something that exists only at the apex, suggesting that authority, decision-making power, and vision flow exclusively from the top down. When we reference "the leadership" of an organization, we automatically mean those with the highest positional authority, regardless of whether they're actually exhibiting true leadership qualities. This language reinforces a scarcity model where only a select few can be considered leaders. Our corporate cultures further amplify these limitations by sorting, categorizing, and valuing specific leadership styles that typically stem from dominant cultural norms. Gregarious verbal communicators who command rooms through speech receive more airtime and influence. Research shows men interrupt women thirty-three times more often than they interrupt other men, exemplifying how communication patterns favor those who align with traditional leadership expectations. The phenomenon of "mansplaining" illustrates how expertise gets undermined when it comes from marginalized voices. These dynamics effectively mute contributions from those who may lead differently. The heroic interpretation of leadership presents another significant limitation. We place leaders on pedestals, expecting them to be unfailing, all-knowing figures who never buckle under pressure. This unrealistic expectation is unsustainable for any leader but creates an especially impossible standard for marginalized leaders who already navigate additional societal burdens. The hero-leader narrative also reinforces individualistic approaches to leadership that overlook collective wisdom and distributed responsibility. Perhaps most limiting is the persistent expectation for compartmentalization in professional settings. Leaders are expected to "check their baggage at the door" and separate their work selves from their personal selves. This requirement disproportionately affects marginalized leaders who carry the weight of navigating societal hierarchies. For those whose social identities add layers of complexity to their leadership journey, the expectation to compartmentalize becomes an additional burden that their counterparts in dominant groups don't face. Despite necessary discussions on diversity, equity, and inclusion (DEI), these efforts often remain ancillary or performative because they fail to address the fundamental issue: our understanding of leadership stems from a problematic core. Organizations frequently hire DEI consultants or executives but don't question the underlying leadership structures that perpetuate exclusion. This "misleadership" - giving the wrong impression about what leadership truly is - persists because we have not sufficiently examined or challenged the sources of our current leadership rhetoric.

Chapter 3: The Unique Capacities of Marginalized Leaders

Leaders from underrepresented backgrounds have developed distinctive capabilities that emerge specifically from navigating professional environments not designed with them in mind. These capacities represent a largely untapped source of leadership expertise that offers significant value to organizations seeking to address complex challenges. Through experiences that differ markedly from those in dominant groups, marginalized leaders cultivate a heightened situational awareness that enables them to read environments with extraordinary precision, understanding both explicit and implicit power dynamics that influence workplace interactions. This awareness manifests as what can be called "stealth mode" leadership - the ability to strategically navigate challenging terrain while minimizing unnecessary risks. Similar to military stealth technology designed to operate undetected, marginalized leaders develop skills to achieve outcomes while reducing the likelihood of triggering biases that could impede their progress. This isn't deception but rather a sophisticated adaptation that allows these leaders to fulfill their missions effectively. They possess an advanced understanding of organizational dynamics and decision-making considerations that proves invaluable when navigating complex systems. Marginalized leaders also demonstrate remarkable flexibility through what might be termed "contortion" - stretching and adapting to align with dominant workplace expectations while maintaining their core integrity. This may involve code-switching in communication, carefully managing emotional expression, and mirroring certain behaviors to build credibility. While this adaptation comes at a personal cost, it also develops extraordinary cognitive flexibility. The mental agility required to navigate different cultural contexts simultaneously creates leaders who can swiftly respond to changing circumstances and understand diverse perspectives with nuance. The experience of marginalization often cultivates a purposeful orientation that extends beyond individual success. Leaders from underrepresented groups frequently approach their roles with a commitment to creating pathways for others and improving systems for those who will follow. This purpose-driven leadership emerges from firsthand experience with exclusionary practices and fuels a dedication to equitable outcomes. Having experienced what it means to be overlooked, these leaders develop inclusive approaches that recognize and amplify diverse contributions, creating environments where innovation can flourish. Perhaps most notable is the contextual agility that marginalized leaders develop - an ability to understand the full complexity of situations by considering historical context, power dynamics, relational factors, and future implications simultaneously. This holistic perspective enables more comprehensive problem-solving and decision-making. Rather than pursuing linear, one-dimensional solutions, these leaders navigate the nuanced interplay between various factors, resulting in more sustainable and equitable outcomes. These capacities represent valuable leadership approaches that have been systematically underrecognized and undervalued. By acknowledging and learning from these unique strengths, organizations can access leadership expertise particularly suited to addressing today's complex challenges. The leadership that emerges from navigating marginality offers precisely the innovative, adaptive, and inclusive approaches needed in an increasingly diverse and rapidly changing world.

Chapter 4: Operating in Stealth Mode: Navigating Hostile Environments

Marginalized leaders develop sophisticated strategies to navigate professional environments where they may be perceived as outsiders. This "stealth mode" operation isn't about deception but about strategic calibration - carefully assessing risks and opportunities to achieve objectives in environments that weren't designed with their success in mind. While their white male counterparts might move through workplaces with fewer repercussions for mistakes, leaders from underrepresented groups must exercise heightened vigilance about how their actions and communications will be interpreted. Upon entering any professional space, particularly for the first time, leaders of color automatically engage in environmental scanning: Who else in the room shares marginalized identities? What formal and informal power structures exist? Who speaks most frequently? Whose ideas gain traction? This constant assessment isn't paranoia but a necessary survival mechanism in spaces where even small missteps can carry outsized consequences. Through this process, these leaders develop an exceptional ability to read unspoken dynamics and navigate complex social systems. This heightened awareness leads to a distinctive approach to decision-making. Recognizing that their decisions may be scrutinized more heavily than those of their counterparts from dominant groups, marginalized leaders often build broad consensus before taking action. They invest significant time developing trust and informal authority, knowing that formal authority alone may not suffice when their decisions face additional scrutiny. This inclusive approach to decision-making isn't merely a defensive tactic but produces better outcomes by incorporating diverse perspectives that might otherwise be overlooked. Stealth leadership often manifests as "leading from the back" - an approach that prioritizes collaboration, relationship-building, and distributed agency rather than centering individual authority. This doesn't indicate weakness or hesitation but represents a sophisticated understanding that sustainable progress requires broad engagement. By building coalitions and empowering others, these leaders create resilient momentum that can withstand opposition. Their impact may be less visible but often proves more durable precisely because it's embedded across multiple levels of an organization. Marginalized leaders frequently find themselves called upon for "stealth cleanup" - being brought in after a crisis or failure to turn situations around. Organizations may seek new perspectives after traditional leadership approaches have fallen short, yet these leaders inherit challenging circumstances with the same or higher expectations for success. The ability to operate effectively under such pressure demonstrates exceptional skill, though the full extent of this capability often goes unrecognized when success is achieved. Perhaps most significant is the "stealth impact" these leaders create - the invisible work of mentoring others with similar identities, advocating for more equitable practices, and creating pathways that didn't previously exist. This labor typically occurs without recognition or compensation, yet it fundamentally shapes organizational cultures and creates crucial support systems for future generations of diverse leaders. This commitment to paying it forward demonstrates how marginalized leaders often operate with a dual purpose: achieving immediate objectives while simultaneously building more inclusive environments for those who will follow.

Chapter 5: Contortion and Authenticity: The Balancing Act

Leaders from marginalized backgrounds engage in a complex balancing act between authenticity and professional expectations that parallels the extraordinary flexibility of circus contortionists. To navigate environments established through dominant cultural norms, these leaders must stretch and bend in ways that can feel unnatural but are necessary for career advancement. They carefully assess which aspects of themselves can be safely expressed in professional settings and which might trigger bias or resistance, developing an advanced mental calculus to determine the appropriate degree of self-expression in any given context. The growing leadership discourse around authenticity and vulnerability presents a particular challenge for marginalized leaders. While figures like Brené Brown have popularized vulnerability as essential for effective leadership, this approach carries asymmetrical risks. For leaders of color, women, and others with underrepresented identities, displaying vulnerability may reinforce negative stereotypes or be interpreted as weakness rather than courage. The ultimate vulnerability - naming microaggressions or inequities in the workplace - can result in real consequences, from being labeled "not a team player" to formal reprimands that impact career progression. Code-switching represents one of the most common forms of professional contortion, requiring marginalized leaders to adjust their speech patterns, references, and communication styles to align with dominant workplace norms. This cognitive practice demands constant mental scanning and adjustment, utilizing intellectual resources that could otherwise be directed toward actual work challenges. What's rarely acknowledged is that this adaptation represents a sophisticated skill - the ability to read environments and adjust communication for maximum effectiveness with different audiences. Beyond language adjustments, marginalized leaders engage in a broader practice of mirroring - adapting behaviors, work styles, and approaches to align with environmental expectations. This might mean adopting a faster pace when one's natural preference would be more deliberate, or adjusting one's affect to prevent triggering stereotypes about being "too aggressive" or "too passive." Like navigating a disorienting mirror maze, this constant self-monitoring creates a dissonance between one's authentic self and one's professional persona that requires significant emotional labor to manage. Perhaps most demanding is the continuous management of tone, facial expressions, and emotional display. Leaders of color face conflicting expectations - they must appear confident but not arrogant, passionate but not angry, assertive but not threatening. A momentary flash of frustration that might be acceptable from someone in the dominant group could reinforce harmful stereotypes when exhibited by a marginalized leader. This heightened scrutiny creates an impossible standard where even momentary authenticity can carry professional consequences. This sophisticated contortion develops extraordinary leadership capacities that typically go unrecognized. The ability to read rooms, adapt communication styles, and navigate complex social dynamics represents valuable expertise that benefits organizations. Leaders who have mastered these skills demonstrate exceptional emotional intelligence, adaptability, and interpersonal awareness - qualities increasingly recognized as essential for effective leadership. The challenge lies not in acknowledging these skills but in creating environments where such extreme adaptation isn't necessary for professional success.

Chapter 6: Beyond Imposter Syndrome: Reframing Inadequacy

The pervasive phenomenon known as imposter syndrome - that persistent feeling of being a fraud despite external evidence of competence - affects approximately 70 percent of professionals at some point in their careers. This staggering statistic raises a critical question: If so many experience these feelings of inadequacy, might the issue lie not within individuals but within the systems and environments in which they operate? For marginalized leaders, what's commonly labeled as imposter syndrome often represents a natural response to navigating spaces that subtly communicate they don't belong. Traditional approaches to imposter syndrome place the burden of resolution entirely on the individual experiencing these feelings. An entire industry has emerged offering coaching, workshops, and strategies for overcoming what's framed as a personal deficit. This individualistic framing adds insult to injury by suggesting that marginalized professionals not only feel inadequate but should also shoulder the responsibility for fixing those feelings. This perspective fails to acknowledge how environmental factors - such as being the "only" in a room or not seeing people who share your identity in leadership positions - naturally generate questions about belonging. When examining imposter syndrome through the lens of marginalized experiences, we see that it often emerges from valid observations about one's environment rather than irrational self-doubt. Walking into spaces where no one shares your identity or background reasonably prompts questions about whether that space was designed with you in mind. Each microaggression or instance of having one's expertise questioned further reinforces the sense that one doesn't truly belong, creating a vicious cycle that's misattributed to personal inadequacy rather than systemic exclusion. Organizations contribute to these feelings through hiring and promotion practices that implicitly value certain leadership styles and behaviors. When leadership remains narrowly defined through dominant cultural norms, those who lead differently naturally question whether their approaches are valid or valuable. This doubt isn't a syndrome but a logical response to environments that haven't expanded their understanding of what effective leadership can encompass. Ironically, the adaptive behaviors that marginalized leaders develop in response to imposter syndrome often become strengths. The tendency to over-prepare, double-check work, and approach tasks with heightened self-awareness frequently results in excellent performance. The humility that accompanies questioning one's knowledge creates openness to learning and growth. These qualities represent valuable leadership assets that could be celebrated rather than pathologized as symptoms of a syndrome. Reframing imposter syndrome requires shifting focus from individual psychology to environmental conditions. Rather than asking marginalized leaders to overcome their feelings of inadequacy, organizations should examine what aspects of their culture trigger these responses. Creating environments where diverse leadership styles are valued, mistakes are normalized as part of growth, and representation exists across all levels naturally reduces the conditions that generate imposter syndrome. This shift recognizes that what's been labeled a personal syndrome is actually a systemic issue requiring systemic solutions.

Chapter 7: Contextual Agility: Leading with Purpose and Awareness

Effective leadership must transcend traditional frameworks and embrace a more nuanced approach centered on contextual agility - the capacity to understand and respond to the complex interplay between past influences, present dynamics, and future aspirations. This approach requires leaders to develop deep self-awareness, navigate systems thoughtfully, leverage historical understanding, and maintain a clear vision of purpose. Unlike prescriptive leadership models that offer simplistic formulas, contextual leadership acknowledges the dynamic complexity of human systems and equips leaders to respond with appropriate flexibility. Self-awareness forms the foundation of contextual agility, requiring leaders to understand not just their preferences and styles but also their biases, triggers, and areas for growth. This goes far beyond personality assessments to include critical examination of how one's identity, experiences, and worldview shape perceptions and decisions. For marginalized leaders, this awareness often develops through necessity - constantly monitoring how they're perceived and received in professional environments. All leaders benefit from this deeper self-understanding, as it creates the capacity to recognize when personal limitations might be affecting their effectiveness. Navigating systems with contextual agility involves developing literacy around power dynamics, cultural norms, and relational networks. Leaders must understand formal power structures (organizational charts), informal influence (who has whose ear), societal power (how race, gender, and other identities affect interactions), and untapped power (the overlooked strengths of marginalized perspectives). This comprehensive power mapping allows leaders to move effectively through complex environments, building coalitions and creating change even without formal authority. Historical context significantly informs present leadership challenges, yet is frequently overlooked. Organizations inherit structures, practices, and cultural norms that originated in specific historical moments and carry implicit values and assumptions. The great man theory's influence persists in how we identify and develop leaders today, even as we verbally reject its premises. Contextually agile leaders examine these historical influences to understand how past decisions shape present realities, enabling them to challenge assumptions that no longer serve organizational purposes. Purpose provides the compass for contextual leadership, giving direction amid complexity and uncertainty. While traditional leadership frameworks focus primarily on achievement and outcomes, purpose-oriented leadership centers meaning and impact. Marginalized leaders often approach their work with dual purposes - fulfilling their formal responsibilities while simultaneously creating more equitable environments for those who follow. This purpose-driven orientation sustains momentum through challenges and keeps leaders focused on what truly matters amid competing priorities. The real art of contextual leadership lies in balancing these elements - understanding oneself, navigating systems, leveraging history, and maintaining purpose - while responding to ever-changing circumstances. Rather than prescribing specific behaviors or styles, this approach equips leaders with the awareness and flexibility to determine what each unique situation requires. It acknowledges that leadership doesn't happen in isolation but within complex social systems that demand thoughtful engagement rather than formulaic responses. What distinguishes contextual leadership from traditional approaches is its emphasis on describing reality accurately rather than prescribing universal solutions. It requires leaders to see clearly, think critically, and act purposefully based on their assessment of what each situation demands. This descriptive rather than prescriptive approach creates space for diverse leadership styles and perspectives, recognizing that the most effective leadership emerges from a deep understanding of context rather than adherence to rigid formulas.

Summary

The dominant leadership paradigm has been built upon a fundamentally flawed foundation that systematically excludes diverse perspectives and experiences. By examining leadership through the lens of marginalized standpoints, we uncover critical insights that challenge our traditional understanding. The distinctive capacities developed by underrepresented leaders - stealth awareness, contortion agility, purposeful orientation, and contextual intelligence - offer precisely the leadership approaches needed to address our most complex challenges. These capabilities aren't secondary or alternative approaches but represent essential expertise for navigating an increasingly diverse and rapidly changing world. Moving forward requires more than superficial diversity initiatives; it demands a fundamental reexamination of how we define, recognize, and develop leadership at all levels. Organizations must create environments where marginalized perspectives are not just included but valued as sources of innovation and insight. This means diffusing power, sharing context across hierarchical levels, establishing multidirectional feedback mechanisms, and creating space for authentic contribution from all members. The leadership paradigm that emerges from this transformation will be more adaptable, inclusive, and effective - not just for underrepresented groups but for everyone navigating the complexities of modern organizational life. The untapped leadership capacities that have developed in the margins represent our greatest resource for creating more resilient, equitable, and purposeful organizations.

About Author

Loading...

Jenny Vazquez-Newsum

Read more