Righteous Indignation

Righteous Indignation Plot Summary

Introduction

In the heart of West Los Angeles, surrounded by the liberal elite of Hollywood, an unlikely revolutionary was born. Andrew Breitbart, once a self-described "default liberal," transformed himself into one of the most controversial and influential figures in modern American media. His journey from slacker to media warrior represents a fascinating case study in how personal awakening can lead to cultural revolution. Through sheer force of will and a deep understanding of the evolving media landscape, Breitbart managed to challenge what he called the "Democrat-Media Complex" and fundamentally alter the way Americans consume and create news. Breitbart's story provides profound insights into the power of new media to disrupt established narratives, the intellectual foundations of modern political movements, and the tactical brilliance required to wage cultural warfare. His evolution from Huffington Post co-creator to conservative media mogul wasn't merely a political conversion but a strategic revolution in how to fight and win in the increasingly important battlefield of culture. Through his eyes, we witness not just the transformation of a man, but the transformation of an entire media ecosystem - one that continues to shape our public discourse long after his unexpected passing in 2012.

Chapter 1: From Liberal Default to Political Awakening

Andrew Breitbart grew up in Brentwood, an affluent neighborhood in Los Angeles, surrounded by the liberal culture of Hollywood. His parents, Gerald and Arlene Breitbart, were Republicans, but they rarely discussed politics at home. They embodied middle-class American values through their actions rather than words. His father ran a restaurant in Santa Monica, working fifteen hours a day, seven days a week, treating all customers equally regardless of their status. This silent modeling of values would later become significant in Breitbart's understanding of the disconnect between liberal rhetoric and actual behavior. Despite his parents' conservative leanings, Breitbart absorbed the default liberalism of his surroundings. He described himself as a "Generation X slacker" - more interested in pop culture, music, and movies than politics. His academic experience at Tulane University did little to challenge his worldview. Instead, his American Studies program, which he later realized was actually "anti-American Studies," reinforced progressive thinking. Breitbart's college years were marked by hedonism and disinterest in serious matters. He graduated with barely above a 2.0 GPA, having spent most of his time partying rather than studying. His political awakening began in the early 1990s through an unexpected medium: talk radio. Working as a runner for a film production company in Los Angeles, Breitbart spent hours in his car delivering scripts. Bored with the music on FM stations, he discovered talk radio on AM. One pivotal moment came when his father-in-law, actor Orson Bean, asked him why he disliked Rush Limbaugh. Breitbart admitted he had never actually listened to Limbaugh, despite considering him "a Nazi, anti-black, anti-Jewish, and anti-all things decent." When Bean suggested he listen for himself, Breitbart reluctantly tuned in. What Breitbart discovered shocked him. Instead of the hateful rhetoric he expected, he found clear analysis and compelling arguments that made him question his preconceptions. Through Limbaugh and other talk radio hosts like Dennis Prager, Breitbart began to understand what he would later call the "Democrat-Media Complex" - the symbiotic relationship between liberal politicians and mainstream media that shaped public narratives. This realization was cemented during the Clarence Thomas confirmation hearings, where Breitbart witnessed what he considered the unfair treatment of Thomas by Democratic senators and media outlets. The transformation wasn't immediate, but it was profound. Breitbart began to recognize that his default liberalism wasn't based on reasoned conviction but on cultural absorption. As he learned to think independently, he found himself increasingly at odds with the progressive worldview he had unquestioningly accepted. His journey from "default liberal" to conservative media warrior had begun, fueled by a growing sense that the mainstream media wasn't telling the whole story.

Chapter 2: The Frankfurt School and Cultural Marxism

Breitbart's political awakening led him to investigate the intellectual roots of what he saw as the left's dominance of American culture. His research took him to the Frankfurt School, a group of neo-Marxist philosophers and social theorists who fled Nazi Germany in the 1930s and found refuge in American universities, particularly Columbia University. According to Breitbart, these thinkers fundamentally transformed American culture by shifting Marxism's focus from economics to culture. The Frankfurt School, including figures like Max Horkheimer, Theodor Adorno, and Herbert Marcuse, developed "critical theory" - a method of constantly criticizing every aspect of Western society and culture. Unlike traditional Marxism, which focused on class struggle and economic systems, cultural Marxism targeted family structures, religious institutions, educational systems, and media. Breitbart saw this as a deliberate strategy to undermine American values and institutions from within. Particularly influential was Herbert Marcuse, whom Breitbart called "the founder of the New Left." Marcuse's works, including "Eros and Civilization" and "Repressive Tolerance," provided the theoretical framework for what would become the counterculture of the 1960s. Marcuse argued that genuine tolerance required intolerance toward prevailing opinions, attitudes, and institutions. This concept of "repressive tolerance" became, in Breitbart's view, the justification for the left's selective application of free speech principles. Breitbart also traced the tactical implementation of these ideas to Saul Alinsky, whose book "Rules for Radicals" provided a practical guide for community organizers and political activists. Alinsky's methods, which included personalizing targets, ridiculing opponents, and working within the system to change it, were adopted by many progressive organizations. Breitbart noted that both Barack Obama and Hillary Clinton were influenced by Alinsky's tactics. According to Breitbart, this intellectual lineage explained why conservatives consistently lost cultural battles despite winning many electoral ones. While conservatives focused on policy arguments and electoral politics, progressives had been waging a long-term war for cultural institutions. By controlling universities, entertainment, and media, the left shaped the cultural context in which political debates occurred, giving them a decisive advantage regardless of the merits of conservative arguments. This analysis led Breitbart to conclude that conservatives needed to recognize the primacy of culture over politics. "Politics is downstream from culture," became one of his signature phrases. To change America's political direction, conservatives would first need to contest the left's dominance of cultural institutions and create alternative platforms for disseminating information and ideas.

Chapter 3: Breaking Through with New Media

The Internet emerged as Breitbart's primary battlefield in his mission to challenge the Democrat-Media Complex. His initiation into the online world began in the mid-1990s when his friend Seth Jacobsen told him, "I've seen your future and it's the Internet." This prophecy resonated with Breitbart, whose ADHD temperament was perfectly suited to the hyperlinked, fast-paced nature of digital media. The Internet offered something revolutionary: the ability to circumvent traditional media gatekeepers. Breitbart's first significant foray into the digital realm came when he discovered Matt Drudge and the Drudge Report. In Drudge, Breitbart found a kindred spirit - someone operating outside the mainstream media ecosystem who nonetheless wielded substantial influence. The Drudge Report's eclectic mix of political news, entertainment gossip, and oddball stories spoke to Breitbart's own wide-ranging interests. More importantly, Drudge demonstrated that a single individual with a computer could break stories that traditional media either missed or deliberately ignored. His professional break came when he was hired by Arianna Huffington as her researcher. Though Huffington would later become a prominent liberal voice, at the time she was positioning herself as a conservative commentator. Working for Huffington, Breitbart honed his research skills and developed a deeper understanding of how news narratives were constructed. One of their significant collaborations involved exposing how a major Clinton donor, M. Larry Lawrence, had falsely claimed to be a Merchant Marine veteran to secure burial at Arlington National Cemetery. The Lawrence story provided Breitbart with a template for future media battles. Despite initial attacks from mainstream outlets, Huffington's reporting ultimately forced the disinterment of Lawrence from Arlington. Breitbart witnessed firsthand how persistent, fact-based reporting could overcome the reflexive defenses of the political and media establishment. This experience convinced him that with the right strategy and platform, it was possible to break through the media's protective barriers around favored politicians and causes. In 1998, Breitbart experienced another watershed moment when Drudge broke the Monica Lewinsky scandal. The mainstream media had initially refused to publish the story, but Drudge's reporting forced it into the open. Watching this unfold, Breitbart realized that the Internet had fundamentally changed the media landscape. No longer could a handful of editors and producers decide which stories the public would hear. The democratization of information distribution meant that important news could find an audience regardless of the establishment's preferences. These experiences led Breitbart to co-found The Huffington Post with Arianna Huffington in 2005, though he would later break with the site as it moved leftward. For Breitbart, the Huffington Post represented an opportunity to demonstrate the power of combining traditional reporting with the speed and reach of the Internet. Despite his later ideological differences with the site, this venture provided him with valuable insights into building and operating a successful digital media platform.

Chapter 4: ACORN Investigation and Media Revolution

The watershed moment in Breitbart's media career came in 2009 with the ACORN investigation. The Association of Community Organizations for Reform Now (ACORN) was a collection of community-based organizations that advocated for low-income families on issues including voter registration, healthcare, and affordable housing. While ACORN had long been criticized by conservatives for alleged voter fraud and misuse of federal funds, these criticisms had gained little traction in mainstream media. Everything changed when James O'Keefe, a young activist filmmaker, approached Breitbart with undercover videos showing ACORN employees apparently willing to assist a self-described pimp and prostitute (O'Keefe and his collaborator Hannah Giles) in establishing a brothel that would employ underage girls trafficked from El Salvador. The footage was shocking - ACORN employees calmly offering advice on how to hide illegal income, obtain housing, and avoid detection while operating a child prostitution ring. Breitbart immediately recognized the explosive potential of these videos. However, he faced a significant challenge: how to ensure the story received the attention it deserved when mainstream media outlets would likely ignore or downplay it. He devised a strategy of releasing the videos one at a time over several days, building a narrative that would be impossible to dismiss as an isolated incident. By giving Fox News first access to the footage while simultaneously publishing it on his newly launched website Big Government, Breitbart created a media synergy that forced other outlets to take notice. The strategy worked brilliantly. As each new video emerged showing similar conduct at ACORN offices in different cities, the organization's defenders found their positions increasingly untenable. Within days of the first video's release, the U.S. Census Bureau severed its relationship with ACORN. Shortly thereafter, the House and Senate voted overwhelmingly to defund the organization. By March 2010, ACORN announced it was disbanding its national structure. For Breitbart, the ACORN investigation demonstrated several key principles of his media philosophy. First, it showed the power of visual evidence - video footage of wrongdoing was far more compelling than written allegations. Second, it validated his belief that citizen journalists could accomplish what mainstream reporters often would not. Third, it confirmed his understanding of how to pace and structure a story to maximize its impact and prevent premature dismissal. Perhaps most importantly, the ACORN story represented a successful deployment of what Breitbart called "the Abu Ghraib of the Great Society" - using the left's own institutions and moral standards against them. Just as Abu Ghraib photos had damaged support for the Iraq War, the ACORN videos undermined a key organization in the progressive infrastructure. The investigation became a template for future conservative media operations and elevated Breitbart to national prominence as a formidable media strategist.

Chapter 5: Fighting the Complex: Tactics and Strategy

Breitbart approached media warfare with the strategic thinking of a general. He understood that the Democrat-Media Complex operated according to specific patterns and vulnerabilities that could be exploited by savvy opponents. His tactical approach combined elements from Alinsky's "Rules for Radicals" with innovations tailored to the digital age, creating a new playbook for conservative media activism. Central to Breitbart's strategy was the concept of "walking toward the fire." He urged conservatives to engage directly with hostile media rather than remaining in comfortable echo chambers. This meant appearing on progressive talk shows, confronting critics face-to-face, and deliberately entering spaces where conservative voices were unwelcome. During one memorable appearance on Bill Maher's HBO show, Breitbart directly challenged Maher's characterization of Rush Limbaugh as racist, forcing an uncomfortable discussion about evidence versus allegation. Another key tactic was what Breitbart called "controlling your own story." He recognized that traditional media outlets often framed stories to fit predetermined narratives. By releasing information strategically - timing revelations for maximum impact and providing context that would be difficult for journalists to ignore - Breitbart ensured that even hostile coverage would include essential elements of his preferred framing. The serialized release of the ACORN videos exemplified this approach. Breitbart also emphasized the importance of "ubiquity" in media strategy. Rather than hoarding exclusive content, he often shared stories with multiple outlets simultaneously, ensuring widespread coverage that no single publication could contain or control. This approach recognized that in the digital age, impact often matters more than exclusivity. By distributing content widely, Breitbart maximized the chances that stories would reach diverse audiences and break through media filters. Perhaps most controversially, Breitbart advocated turning the left's tactics of personal destruction against them. He argued that conservatives had traditionally refrained from attacking the character and motives of their opponents, preferring to engage on policy issues. Meanwhile, progressives routinely personalized political disagreements, questioning not just the ideas but the moral standing of conservatives. Breitbart insisted that conservatives needed to fight fire with fire, exposing hypocrisy and corruption among liberal figures with the same vigor that the left directed at conservatives. Underlying all these tactics was Breitbart's insistence that truth was the ultimate weapon. He believed that much of progressive ideology relied on carefully maintained illusions that could not withstand direct exposure. By revealing unfiltered reality - whether through undercover videos, leaked documents, or firsthand reporting - Breitbart sought to puncture these illusions and force honest debate. This commitment to truth, however uncomfortable, became the ethical foundation for his provocative approach to media activism.

Chapter 6: Tea Party Defender and Free Speech Advocate

When the Tea Party movement emerged in early 2009 as a grassroots response to government bailouts and healthcare reform, many mainstream media outlets portrayed it as a fringe movement motivated by racism and extremism. Breitbart, seeing parallels with how the media had treated him and other conservatives, became one of the movement's most vocal defenders. He attended numerous Tea Party rallies, documenting them firsthand and challenging media characterizations that bore little resemblance to what he witnessed. At these events, Breitbart observed a diverse cross-section of Americans concerned about government overreach, fiscal responsibility, and constitutional principles. Far from the violent racists portrayed in some media accounts, he found ordinary citizens engaging in peaceful political expression. This disconnect between reality and reporting reinforced Breitbart's conviction that the mainstream media operated as an extension of progressive political power, deliberately misrepresenting threats to the established order. The most dramatic manifestation of Breitbart's defense came when members of the Congressional Black Caucus claimed that Tea Party protesters had shouted racial slurs at them during a healthcare vote. Breitbart immediately challenged the allegation, offering $100,000 to anyone who could provide video evidence supporting the claim. Despite the numerous cameras present at the event, no such evidence emerged. Breitbart's reward went unclaimed, demonstrating what he saw as the media's willingness to amplify unsubstantiated allegations against conservative movements. Beyond defending the Tea Party specifically, Breitbart became an increasingly prominent advocate for free speech and ideological diversity. He argued that political correctness had created a climate of fear where people self-censored to avoid social and professional penalties. This dynamic, he believed, skewed public discourse by artificially suppressing certain viewpoints while amplifying others. Breitbart saw his mission as creating spaces where forbidden ideas could be expressed and debated on their merits. This commitment to free expression extended even to those with whom Breitbart disagreed. When he co-founded the Huffington Post with Arianna Huffington, he deliberately included voices from across the political spectrum. Similarly, his "Big" websites featured contributors with diverse perspectives, united less by ideology than by a willingness to challenge orthodoxy. For Breitbart, intellectual freedom was both a core value and a strategic necessity - only through open debate could bad ideas be exposed and good ones refined. As his profile rose, Breitbart experienced firsthand the tactics he had long criticized. He faced sustained personal attacks, attempts to discredit his reporting, and efforts to isolate him professionally. Rather than retreating, Breitbart embraced his polarizing status, often deliberately provoking his critics to illustrate their tactics. This confrontational approach made him a divisive figure but also demonstrated his commitment to practicing what he preached about standing firm against intimidation.

Chapter 7: Building a Media Movement

In the final years of his life, Breitbart focused on building a sustainable media ecosystem that could continue his work of challenging the Democrat-Media Complex. This meant creating platforms, developing talent, and establishing operational models that could survive beyond any individual personality. The result was a network of websites that collectively became known as "Breitbart News." The foundation of this network began with the launch of Breitbart.com and Breitbart.tv, which aggregated news and video content. Building on this foundation, Breitbart created a series of specialized sites addressing different aspects of American culture and politics: Big Hollywood focused on entertainment, Big Government on politics, Big Journalism on media criticism, and Big Peace on national security. Each site combined professional editing with contributions from citizen journalists, creating a hybrid model that leveraged both expertise and grassroots energy. Unlike many conservative media outlets that primarily served existing right-leaning audiences, Breitbart deliberately structured his sites to penetrate broader cultural conversations. He emphasized visual content, provocative headlines, and stories that would generate discussion beyond ideological boundaries. This approach reflected his belief that culture shapes politics, not vice versa. By entering cultural spaces traditionally dominated by the left, Breitbart sought to change the context in which political debates occurred. Breitbart also invested heavily in developing new talent. He identified promising citizen journalists and gave them platforms to reach larger audiences. James O'Keefe, whose ACORN investigation launched Big Government, exemplified this approach. Similarly, Breitbart elevated voices like Dana Loesch and Larry O'Connor from blogging obscurity to national prominence. This talent development created a multiplier effect, allowing Breitbart's influence to extend far beyond his personal capacity. Technology played a crucial role in Breitbart's media strategy. He embraced social media early, recognizing platforms like Twitter and Facebook as powerful tools for circumventing traditional media gatekeepers. By building large followings on these platforms, Breitbart could directly reach millions of people without intermediaries. He encouraged his contributors to do the same, creating networked distribution that made it difficult for the mainstream media to ignore stories that gained traction in social spaces. Perhaps most importantly, Breitbart fostered a culture of fearlessness among his contributors and allies. He demonstrated through his own example that it was possible to withstand the inevitable backlash that came with challenging powerful interests. When contributors faced attacks or intimidation, Breitbart would often lead the counteroffensive, drawing fire toward himself and away from less established voices. This created an environment where others felt emboldened to take risks and speak uncomfortable truths. By the time of his unexpected death in March 2012 at age 43, Breitbart had built a media operation that continued to grow in his absence. The network of sites he established evolved into Breitbart News, which became one of the most influential conservative media outlets during the 2016 election and beyond. More broadly, his approach to activist journalism inspired numerous imitators across the political spectrum, fundamentally altering how media and politics interact in the digital age.

Summary

Andrew Breitbart's legacy transcends simple political categorization, representing something more profound about the intersection of media, culture, and power in the digital age. His central insight – that politics flows downstream from culture – fundamentally challenged the conservative movement's traditional focus on policy and elections. By demonstrating that cultural institutions shape the context in which political debates occur, Breitbart redirected conservative energy toward contesting the narratives that frame public discourse. Breitbart's tactical innovations continue to influence media operations across the political spectrum. His emphasis on visual evidence, strategic timing, and persistent follow-through created a template for effective activism in an attention-scarce environment. More importantly, his willingness to "walk toward the fire" – to engage directly with hostile audiences and withstand personal attacks – inspired countless others to speak out despite the social and professional risks. In an era when cancel culture and social media pile-ons can silence dissenting voices, Breitbart's defiant example reminds us that courage remains the essential prerequisite for meaningful cultural change. His life demonstrates that a single determined individual, armed with truth and technological savvy, can indeed challenge entrenched power structures and alter the course of public conversation.

About Author

Loading...

Andrew Breitbart

Andrew J. Breitbart was an American publisher, commentator for the Washington Times, author, an occasional guest commentator on various news programs who has served as an editor for the Drudge Report website. He was a researcher for Arianna Huffington, and helped launch her website, The Huffington Post.He ran his own news aggregation site, Breitbart.com, and five other websites: Breitbart.tv, Big Hollywood, Big Government, Big Journalism, and Big Peace.

Read more