Liminal Thinking

Liminal Thinking Plot Summary

Introduction

In a world of increasingly complex challenges, our ability to navigate change often depends not on what we know, but on how we think. Liminal thinking represents a revolutionary approach to understanding the space between what we perceive and what is possible - the threshold where transformation begins. This approach illuminates how our beliefs, often unconsciously constructed, shape our perception of reality and limit our capacity for change. The framework of liminal thinking provides answers to fundamental questions: How do we form beliefs? Why do we defend them so vigorously? How do these beliefs create shared worlds with others? Most importantly, how can we transcend our limiting beliefs to create positive change? By understanding the architecture of belief, we gain access to a powerful set of practices that can help us break through self-imposed barriers, see new possibilities, and create meaningful change in ourselves and our organizations.

Chapter 1: The Nature of Beliefs as Imperfect Models of Reality

Beliefs appear to us as perfect representations of reality, but they are actually imperfect models we use to navigate a complex, multidimensional world that is fundamentally unknowable in its entirety. This is the core premise that underlies liminal thinking - our beliefs are not reality itself, but constructions we use to make sense of reality. The ancient parable of the blind men and the elephant illustrates this concept perfectly. Each man touches a different part of the elephant - the trunk, the tusk, the side - and declares with certainty that an elephant is like a snake, a spear, or a wall. Each man's experience is real, but incomplete. Similarly, our beliefs are based on our limited experiences, yet we often mistake them for the whole truth. When we confuse our beliefs with reality, we enter what can be called "battles for the obvious" - conflicts that arise when people with different beliefs cannot understand how others could possibly see things differently. These battles occur in families, organizations, and societies, often leading to frustration and an inability to create positive change. The key insight is that what seems obvious to us depends entirely on our point of view and experiences. Einstein once remarked that it was his "religion" to believe in the existence of an objective reality, because he could not prove it. This humility about the limitations of our knowledge is essential to liminal thinking. While we can assume there is a valid, objective reality, we must accept that any understanding we can gain will be constrained by our perspective. We know some things, but nobody can know everything. Understanding that beliefs are models rather than reality creates a crucial opening for change. It allows us to hold our beliefs more lightly, to question them, and to consider alternative perspectives that might lead to new insights and possibilities. This is the threshold - the liminal space - where transformation becomes possible.

Chapter 2: How Beliefs Are Constructed and Shape Perception

Beliefs don't simply appear fully formed in our minds; they are constructed gradually through a hierarchical process that begins with our experiences and culminates in a simplified model of reality. This construction process, which can be visualized as a pyramid, explains why our beliefs seem so obvious to us, yet can differ so dramatically from person to person. At the base of this pyramid lies reality itself - complex, multidimensional, and ultimately unknowable in its entirety. As we move through life, we experience small portions of this reality through our senses. These experiences are necessarily limited - even identical twins will have different experiences over the course of their lives. From these limited experiences, we pay attention to only a tiny fraction. Neuroscientist Manfred Zimmermann estimates that our conscious attention has a capacity of about 40 bits per second out of a potential 11 million bits we perceive - meaning we miss 10,999,960 bits of information every second. From this thin slice of attention, we form theories and make judgments. These theories and judgments, often reinforced by conversations with others who share similar experiences, eventually solidify into beliefs - our simplified maps for navigating the world. The pyramid narrows dramatically from base to peak, with our beliefs representing an extraordinarily simplified version of an infinitely complex reality. This construction process explains why beliefs are so personal and why people can have such different views of the "obvious." When we stand atop our belief pyramid, we feel we are standing on solid ground - that our version of reality is simply "the way it is." We forget that we've constructed this reality from a tiny subset of all possible experiences. The space between objective reality and our constructed "obvious" is liminal space - the threshold where transformation can occur. By becoming conscious of this invisible construction process, both in ourselves and others, we gain the ability to understand and reshape beliefs. This awareness allows us to navigate change more effectively by recognizing that our "obvious" is just one of many possible versions of reality.

Chapter 3: The Shared Worlds Created by Collective Beliefs

Beliefs are not merely individual mental constructs; they are the psychological material we use to co-create shared worlds with others. When people interact regularly, their individual belief systems form intricate webs of shared understanding that establish the rules and routines of daily life. Understanding how these shared worlds emerge and function is essential for creating meaningful change. At its core, a belief is a story in our head - a cause-and-effect chain that serves as a rule for action. It typically follows a pattern: if you have a need, then apply a belief that provides a rule for action to get the desired result. These beliefs form through learning loops - continuous feedback cycles of needs, thinking, and action that create habits over time. When multiple learning loops interact, they form what can be called a "story web" - a shared reality co-created by all participants. The power of these story webs becomes apparent when we realize they can create either "doom loops" or "delight loops." Consider the story of Spitfire, a rescue dog who became aggressive when given a bone, even attacking a family member who approached. This behavior stemmed from a belief the dog had developed in his previous environment - likely that resources needed to be fiercely protected. The family initially considered returning the dog but instead chose to work with a trainer who helped them understand and reshape the dog's beliefs through positive reinforcement. Over time, Spitfire transformed from a "problem dog" to a "good dog" - a different shared world created through changed beliefs and actions. Similar dynamics occur in human relationships, teams, and organizations. A child throwing a tantrum in a grocery store and a parent giving in creates a story web that reinforces certain behaviors and beliefs for both parties. In workplaces, patterns of interaction between managers and employees establish unspoken rules about what is valued and how decisions are made. The profound implication is that these shared worlds are not fixed - they are constructed through ongoing interactions and can be changed. What often appears as "just the way it is" is actually one possible version of reality that participants have created together. By understanding how story webs function, we gain the ability to identify negative patterns and intentionally create more positive shared worlds through changed beliefs and actions.

Chapter 4: Breaking Through Self-Sealing Logic Bubbles

Our beliefs don't exist in isolation - they form interconnected systems that actively defend themselves against contradictory information. These self-sealing logic bubbles create blind spots that prevent us from seeing valid alternatives and opportunities, making them one of the greatest barriers to change and growth. Research on political beliefs provides a striking illustration of this phenomenon. Studies comparing how Democrats and Republicans interpreted facts about the Iraq War showed that both groups accepted the same basic facts but drew dramatically different conclusions based on their existing beliefs. When confronted with information that contradicted their worldview, people didn't change their beliefs - instead, they reinterpreted or discounted the contradictory evidence to maintain their existing belief structure. This self-sealing logic operates not just in politics but in every domain of life. Business executives in Detroit spent decades dismissing evidence of Toyota's manufacturing superiority, first by disbelieving the data, then by attributing success to cultural factors, and finally by focusing on manufacturing processes - anything but question their fundamental beliefs about management and employee capabilities. Similarly, Nokia executives dismissed the threat of the iPhone, confidently stating their product was superior even as Apple began dismantling their market dominance. The mechanism behind this resistance involves how we evaluate new information. We judge ideas first on internal coherence (does it make sense given what I already know?) and only secondarily on external validity (does it work when tested?). The critical insight is that people rarely test ideas for external validity when they lack internal coherence. If something doesn't make sense within our existing belief bubble, we typically dismiss it without investigation, protecting the consistency of our worldview. These self-sealing bubbles create artificial constraints that blind us to possibilities. When a friend told the author he couldn't get a teaching job without a master's degree, the author decided to test this belief by simply applying for jobs anyway. He succeeded in getting hired, revealing that what seemed like an absolute constraint was actually just a limiting belief. Breaking through these self-sealing bubbles requires the courage to test and validate new ideas, even when they initially seem absurd, crazy, or wrong. By questioning what seems "obvious" and being willing to explore alternatives, we can discover doorways to new possibilities that would otherwise remain invisible.

Chapter 5: Creating Change by Embracing Uncertainty

Creating meaningful change requires us to venture into the uncomfortable territory of uncertainty. When we cling to certainty and attempt to control outcomes, we paradoxically reduce our ability to effect positive change. The path to transformation begins with acknowledging that our understanding is always incomplete and embracing the liminal space between what we know and what is possible. This principle is illustrated by the story of Jason Roberts, who wanted to create European-style community spaces in his Dallas neighborhood. When he investigated city regulations, he discovered numerous rules that seemed to make his vision impossible. Rather than accepting these constraints, Roberts and his friends created a temporary "pop-up" neighborhood design that broke many of these rules. They invited city council members to see their creation and asked why such restrictive regulations existed. To their surprise, council members admitted they didn't know why many of these rules existed and agreed they could be changed. By acting "as if" the constraints didn't exist, Roberts revealed that many obstacles were imaginary - just outdated rules nobody had questioned. This approach exemplifies "double-loop learning" - a powerful technique for breaking out of established patterns. While single-loop learning works within existing beliefs to refine and improve them, double-loop learning challenges the underlying beliefs themselves. It allows us to test hypotheses without necessarily believing they're true - we simply act as if they were true and observe the results. This creates an experimental approach to change where we can safely explore alternative realities. The practice involves recognizing that we operate within a "reality distortion field" created by our beliefs, identifying the underlying needs and assumptions in any situation, exploring alternative beliefs, and testing them through action. We don't need to be convinced of a new idea's validity to test it - we just need the courage to act differently and observe what happens. This willingness to embrace uncertainty and experiment with new possibilities is what separates effective change agents from those who remain stuck in existing patterns. Change happens at the boundaries - the thresholds between the known and unknown, between old ways and new possibilities. By operating in this liminal space, we access worlds of possibility that remain invisible to those who cling to certainty.

Chapter 6: The Nine Practices of Liminal Thinking

Liminal thinking isn't just a theoretical framework - it's a practical discipline with specific practices that can be learned and applied. These nine practices provide a comprehensive approach to understanding, reshaping, and transcending beliefs to create positive change in any context. The first practice is to assume you are not objective. If you're part of a system you want to change, you're also part of the problem. The Johari window concept illustrates how we all have blind spots - aspects of ourselves that others can see but we cannot. When facing persistent problems, start by examining how your own beliefs and behaviors might be contributing to the situation. The second practice is to empty your cup - to let go of existing knowledge and assumptions to make room for new understanding. This requires adopting what Zen practitioners call "beginner's mind" - an attitude of openness, curiosity, and eagerness to learn. By suspending judgment and truly listening, you can perceive what's actually happening rather than what you expect to see. Creating safe space constitutes the third practice. People will not share their innermost needs unless they feel safe, respected, and accepted. Understanding emotional needs is critical for change, as they drive behavior far more powerfully than logical arguments. The SCARF model (Status, Certainty, Autonomy, Relatedness, and Fairness) provides a framework for identifying these fundamental needs. The fourth practice involves triangulating and validating - looking at situations from multiple perspectives to gain a more complete understanding. If something doesn't make sense, you're missing something. People act in ways that make sense to them based on their beliefs and experiences. By developing multiple viewpoints and theories, you can discover insights that would be invisible from any single perspective. Asking questions and making connections forms the fifth practice. By exploring people's hopes, dreams, and frustrations, you can reveal latent needs and identify new opportunities. The sixth practice focuses on disrupting routines, as many beliefs become embedded in habitual behaviors that run on autopilot. Sometimes the solution to a problem isn't attacking the problem directly but disrupting the routine that maintains it. The seventh practice involves acting "as if" in the present moment - testing beliefs by behaving as if they were true, regardless of whether you believe them. The eighth practice emphasizes making sense with stories, recognizing that storytelling is how humans naturally process and share information. Facts alone won't change beliefs; they must be embedded in meaningful narratives. Finally, the ninth practice is to evolve yourself. To change the world, you must be willing to change yourself. This often requires taking risks and remaining open about how change affects you personally. By cultivating psychological flexibility and a willingness to transform, you increase your capacity to create positive change in all aspects of life.

Summary

The essence of liminal thinking is captured in a simple yet profound insight: beliefs are not reality but constructed models that both enable and constrain our capacity for change. By understanding how beliefs are formed, how they create shared worlds, and how they defend themselves, we gain the ability to intentionally reshape them to create positive transformation. The nine practices of liminal thinking provide practical tools for navigating the threshold between what is and what could be. The true power of this approach extends far beyond personal growth or organizational change. As Einstein noted, "A new type of thinking is essential if mankind is to survive and move toward higher levels." In a world facing increasingly complex challenges, the ability to transcend limiting beliefs and create new possibilities may be our most valuable skill. Liminal thinking offers a path toward the kind of psychological agility and creative problem-solving that can help us build more collaborative, innovative, and compassionate communities - not by imposing change from above, but by understanding and reshaping the beliefs that form the foundation of our shared reality.

About Author

Loading...

Dave Gray

Read more