Stretch

Stretch Plot Summary

Introduction

We live in a society that constantly teaches us we need more to achieve more. Whether in business, careers, or personal lives, we typically believe that success requires acquiring additional resources – more funding, more staff, more time, more connections. This mindset leads to an endless chase that rarely delivers the satisfaction or results we seek. The central premise challenges this conventional wisdom by revealing that how we use resources matters far more than how much we have. Through extensive research and compelling examples, we are shown that resourcefulness – the ability to accomplish more with less – is not merely a survival skill for tough times but a superior approach that produces better outcomes and greater fulfillment in all circumstances. The evidence is drawn from diverse fields including psychology, organizational behavior, and economics, alongside real-world cases from entrepreneurs, artists, and professionals who have achieved remarkable success by stretching their existing resources rather than pursuing more. This approach reveals that constraints, often viewed as limitations to overcome, can actually spark creativity and innovation. By examining both the psychological foundations that drive our tendency to chase and the alternative mindset that enables stretching, we gain practical insights into how we might transform our approach to work, organizations, and life – finding abundance where others see scarcity and achieving more meaningful success with what we already possess.

Chapter 1: The Psychological Foundations of Chasing and Stretching

Chasing and stretching represent two fundamentally different approaches to resources. Chasing embodies the belief that having more resources inevitably leads to better results. This mindset manifests in organizations that relentlessly pursue larger budgets, increased headcount, and expanded facilities regardless of their ability to effectively utilize what they already have. For individuals, it appears as the constant quest for higher salaries, bigger homes, more prestigious titles, or enhanced status symbols. The psychological drivers behind this approach are powerful and deeply ingrained. Social comparison represents a primary foundation of chasing behavior. Research demonstrates that humans naturally gauge their success and worth relative to others, creating a perpetual treadmill effect where satisfaction remains elusive regardless of actual gains. When we observe colleagues with larger offices or companies with bigger marketing budgets, we experience a sense of inadequacy that triggers the chase for equivalent or superior resources. This comparative orientation shifts focus from what we can accomplish to what we lack, generating persistent dissatisfaction. Functional fixedness constitutes another psychological barrier that reinforces chasing. This cognitive bias limits our ability to recognize that objects or resources can serve functions beyond their conventional uses. When trapped by functional fixedness, we perceive resources as having narrow, predefined applications, making it difficult to envision creative alternatives. Rather than reimagining existing resources, we pursue additional ones that seem more suited to our specific needs. This limitation curtails our capacity for innovative problem-solving. Mindless accumulation represents the third psychological foundation of chasing. Research has shown that people frequently acquire resources without clear purpose, driven by the misconception that more is inherently better. Studies reveal that individuals will often expend considerable effort accumulating resources they cannot fully utilize, while experiencing less satisfaction than those who acquired only what they needed. This pattern manifests in organizations stockpiling unused technologies or departments securing budget increases they cannot effectively deploy. In contrast, stretching builds upon different psychological foundations. It starts with psychological ownership – the feeling that resources are genuinely "ours" to transform and reconfigure. When people develop this sense of ownership, they become more invested in finding creative applications for existing resources. Research demonstrates that psychological ownership leads to higher engagement, innovation, and performance, even when individuals don't legally own the resources they're working with. Another critical element of stretching involves embracing constraints rather than viewing them as obstacles to overcome. Studies repeatedly show that constraints can catalyze creativity by forcing individuals to break free from conventional thinking patterns. Artists, entrepreneurs, and scientists often produce their most innovative work when operating with limited resources because restrictions compel them to explore previously unconsidered possibilities. This counterintuitive relationship between constraints and creativity directly contradicts the chasing assumption that fewer limitations would yield better outcomes.

Chapter 2: Embracing Constraints: How Less Creates More

Conventional wisdom suggests that constraints hinder performance. Limited budgets, tight deadlines, and restricted access to resources are typically viewed as obstacles to overcome or disadvantages to minimize. However, a growing body of research and real-world examples demonstrates that constraints often enhance rather than impede creativity, innovation, and overall performance. Properly embraced, limitations become catalysts for superior outcomes. Constraints force us to question assumptions and abandon conventional approaches. When resources are abundant, we typically default to standard solutions – using established methods and following predictable paths. These approaches may be safe, but they rarely lead to breakthrough insights. Constraints disrupt this pattern by rendering standard solutions impractical or impossible. Research from cognitive psychology reveals that when faced with resource limitations, individuals engage different mental processes, accessing more diverse knowledge networks and generating more innovative solutions. Psychological studies provide compelling evidence for this counterintuitive relationship. In one notable experiment, researchers asked participants to solve problems under various resource conditions. Those operating with moderate constraints consistently produced more creative solutions than participants with either abundant resources or extreme limitations. The moderate constraints created just enough tension to stimulate divergent thinking without overwhelming participants' cognitive capacities. Similar patterns emerge across domains from product design to artistic creation, where constraints consistently correlate with higher originality and effectiveness. Real-world innovation frequently emerges from resource scarcity rather than abundance. Historical analyses of technological breakthroughs reveal that many revolutionary innovations originated in resource-constrained environments. Limited funding forces entrepreneurs to identify essential value propositions, eliminate unnecessary features, and discover ingenious workarounds. These constraints become design parameters that guide creators toward elegant, efficient solutions that outperform more resource-intensive alternatives. Constraints also enhance focus and prioritization. With unlimited resources, organizations and individuals often pursue multiple directions simultaneously, diluting their efforts across too many initiatives. Limitations necessitate difficult choices about where to invest scarce resources, driving deeper consideration of strategic priorities. This forced prioritization eliminates peripheral activities and concentrates energy on core objectives. Studies of successful startups repeatedly demonstrate that funding constraints compel founders to identify and ruthlessly pursue their most promising opportunities rather than diffusing efforts across multiple ventures. The benefits of constraints extend beyond initial creative moments to implementation and execution. Teams working with limited resources develop practices that maximize efficiency and adaptability. They learn to extract maximum value from each resource, fostering a culture of resourcefulness that becomes self-reinforcing. Over time, this capability for doing more with less becomes a sustainable competitive advantage, allowing organizations to outperform competitors that depend on resource abundance. This explains why some organizations maintain their innovative edge even after achieving success, while others lose their creative momentum as resources increase.

Chapter 3: The Multi-Context Advantage of Outsider Perspectives

Expertise has traditionally been viewed as the gold standard for problem-solving and innovation. Conventional wisdom holds that deep domain knowledge, accumulated through years of focused experience, provides the optimal foundation for addressing complex challenges. However, research increasingly reveals that outsiders – individuals with limited domain-specific knowledge but diverse experiences across multiple contexts – often outperform specialists in solving complex problems, particularly those requiring innovative approaches. This outsider advantage stems from cognitive diversity rather than knowledge deficiency. When specialists immerse themselves in a single domain, they naturally adopt the conceptual frameworks, assumptions, and problem-solving approaches dominant within that field. While this specialized knowledge enables efficient handling of routine challenges, it simultaneously constrains thinking through what psychologists call cognitive entrenchment – the inability to break free from established mental models. Outsiders avoid this entrenchment precisely because they lack deep socialization within the domain, allowing them to approach problems without preconceived notions about "correct" solutions. Multiple studies support this counterintuitive finding. In one particularly illuminating research project, scientists were asked to solve challenging problems outside their specialties. Rather than performing worse, these scientists were significantly more successful at solving problems outside their domains than within them. When experts attempted problems in their own fields, they relied on standard approaches that often proved inadequate for particularly difficult challenges. When working outside their specialties, they were forced to reason from first principles and draw analogies from their diverse knowledge, leading to more innovative solutions. Outsiders derive another advantage from their ability to transfer solutions across contexts. Having operated in multiple domains, they naturally recognize patterns and principles that specialists might overlook. This cross-pollination enables them to import successful approaches from one field to another, often yielding breakthrough innovations. The history of scientific and technological advancement is replete with examples of outsiders who transformed fields precisely because they applied principles from unrelated domains to solve seemingly intractable problems. Organizations can systematically harness this outsider advantage through structural approaches. Research demonstrates that teams composed of individuals with diverse backgrounds consistently outperform homogeneous groups of specialists on complex problems requiring innovation. The cognitive friction generated by these different perspectives, when properly managed, produces solutions that incorporate multiple viewpoints and approaches. Moreover, organizations can foster outsider thinking even among specialists by encouraging cross-disciplinary experiences, temporary role changes, and deliberate exposure to unfamiliar contexts. The multi-context advantage extends beyond immediate problem-solving to long-term adaptability. In rapidly changing environments, the ability to recognize patterns across contexts becomes increasingly valuable. Studies of executive performance reveal that leaders with diverse career experiences across functions, industries, and geographic regions significantly outperform those with more linear career trajectories. This advantage increases during periods of disruption or uncertainty, precisely when conventional expertise often proves insufficient.

Chapter 4: Acting vs. Planning: When to Let Go of Perfect Preparation

The dominant paradigm in both organizational and individual endeavors emphasizes thorough planning as the cornerstone of success. Strategic plans, detailed roadmaps, and extensive preparation are widely considered essential prerequisites for effective action. However, compelling evidence suggests that excessive planning often undermines performance, particularly in dynamic or uncertain environments. Understanding when to act with incomplete information and minimal preparation represents a critical aspect of resourcefulness. Planning inherently assumes predictability and stability that rarely exists in complex situations. Research examining organizational performance during periods of change reveals that companies following detailed strategic plans frequently underperform more adaptive competitors. This occurs because planning processes typically rely on assumptions about future conditions that inevitably prove incorrect. As circumstances evolve, plans become progressively misaligned with reality, yet psychological attachment to these plans often prevents appropriate adjustments. By contrast, organizations that emphasize action over planning demonstrate greater responsiveness to changing conditions. Psychological studies illuminate why planning-oriented approaches often fall short. When developing plans, individuals naturally focus on anticipated challenges and ideal resource configurations rather than working creatively with available assets. This orientation subtly reinforces the chasing mindset by emphasizing resource gaps rather than existing possibilities. Moreover, the act of planning creates psychological commitment to specified approaches, making individuals less receptive to emergent opportunities and alternative pathways. Research on entrepreneurial ventures demonstrates that successful founders typically begin with general directions rather than detailed plans, allowing their strategies to evolve through action and learning. Planning also creates temporal delays that reduce effectiveness in competitive environments. Studies of market entry timing consistently show that organizations waiting for perfect conditions and complete preparation frequently miss critical windows of opportunity. The advantages of earlier action – including customer relationships, learning experiences, and competitive positioning – often outweigh the benefits of more thorough preparation. This pattern appears across domains from product launches to career transitions, where "good enough" action typically outperforms delayed perfection. Action-oriented approaches generate crucial learning that planning cannot provide. Even the most sophisticated planning processes cannot anticipate all contingencies or fully predict how systems will respond to interventions. By taking action and observing outcomes, individuals gain context-specific knowledge unavailable through abstract planning. Studies of expert performance reveal that practical knowledge developed through direct experience typically proves more valuable than theoretical knowledge acquired through planning and analysis, particularly for complex challenges in uncertain environments. The optimal approach integrates action and planning rather than privileging either exclusively. Research on effective decision-making identifies a pattern of iterative cycles where limited planning guides initial action, followed by reflection and adjustment based on outcomes. This approach combines the orientation benefits of planning with the learning advantages of action while avoiding the paralysis of perfectionism. Organizations and individuals demonstrating this balanced approach typically outperform those skewed toward either extreme planning or impulsive action.

Chapter 5: Setting Positive Expectations That Fuel Growth

Expectations powerfully shape outcomes across virtually all domains of human endeavor. What we expect – of ourselves, others, and situations – doesn't merely predict results but actively influences them through complex psychological mechanisms. Understanding and deliberately leveraging these expectation effects represents a crucial element of resourcefulness that transforms limitations into opportunities for growth and achievement. The transformative power of expectations has been scientifically documented through decades of research on what psychologists call self-fulfilling prophecies. In groundbreaking studies, researchers demonstrated that teachers' expectations about student potential significantly influenced actual academic performance, even when those expectations were based on completely arbitrary assignments rather than genuine assessments. Students randomly designated as "high potential" showed substantial improvements in test scores compared to peers, despite having identical starting capabilities. Similar effects appear consistently across contexts from workplace performance to athletic achievement to medical outcomes. Expectations operate through multiple pathways that directly affect resource utilization. At the cognitive level, positive expectations direct attention toward opportunities rather than limitations, enabling individuals to recognize possibilities others might overlook. Neurological research reveals that optimistic expectations literally change what we perceive, expanding our awareness of potential resources and approaches. This perceptual shift allows individuals to identify and leverage assets that pessimistic or neutral expectations would render invisible. The behavioral impact of expectations further amplifies their effects. When we expect success, we naturally invest greater effort, persist longer in the face of obstacles, and attempt more challenging approaches than when expectations are negative. These behavioral changes significantly increase the likelihood of positive outcomes, creating virtuous cycles where initial successes reinforce positive expectations and fuel subsequent achievement. Organizations and individuals that systematically cultivate positive expectations consistently outperform those characterized by doubt or excessive caution. Perhaps most importantly, expectations fundamentally alter how we respond to setbacks and failures. Research on resilience demonstrates that individuals with positive expectations interpret challenges as temporary obstacles to be overcome rather than permanent limitations or evidence of inadequacy. This interpretive framework enables them to learn from difficulties and adjust approaches without abandoning core objectives. Studies of entrepreneurial persistence reveal that founders with positive expectations about eventual success demonstrate substantially higher resilience during inevitable setbacks than those harboring doubts. Deliberately engineering positive expectations requires specific practices rather than generic optimism. Research identifies several evidence-based approaches, including setting progressive challenges that build confidence through incremental successes, focusing attention on past achievements rather than failures, creating supportive environments that reinforce capability beliefs, and developing specific implementation intentions that link goals to concrete actions. Organizations and individuals who systematically implement these practices consistently demonstrate superior performance across diverse contexts.

Chapter 6: Making Powerful Combinations From Unlikely Resources

Innovation frequently emerges not from acquiring new resources but from combining existing ones in unexpected ways. While conventional thinking typically focuses on resource acquisition, substantial evidence demonstrates that reconfiguring and recombining available assets often yields greater value than pursuing additional resources. This combinatorial approach represents a particularly powerful manifestation of resourcefulness that transforms limitations into advantages. Historical analyses of breakthrough innovations reveal that many resulted from novel combinations of existing technologies rather than fundamentally new inventions. Research examining patent citations demonstrates that the most influential innovations typically integrate components from previously unconnected domains, creating value precisely through these unexpected combinations. This pattern appears consistently across fields from medicine to computing to manufacturing, suggesting that combinatorial thinking represents a universal principle of innovation rather than a domain-specific strategy. Psychological studies illuminate why unexpected combinations prove so powerful. When resources from different contexts come together, they challenge established conceptual categories and trigger what cognitive scientists call frame-breaking thinking. This cognitive disruption forces individuals to reassess assumptions and develop new mental models that accommodate the unusual combination. Research demonstrates that exposure to seemingly incompatible concepts significantly enhances creative performance by activating more distant associations in semantic memory. Organizations systematically leveraging combinatorial approaches consistently outperform competitors focused on resource acquisition. Studies of corporate innovation reveal that companies maintaining diverse resource portfolios and encouraging cross-functional collaboration generate substantially more breakthrough innovations than those pursuing depth in narrower domains. The competitive advantage stems not from having more resources but from creating more numerous and unusual combinations among existing assets. This pattern appears across industries from pharmaceuticals to consumer products to professional services. Implementing combinatorial approaches requires specific organizational practices that counteract natural tendencies toward specialization and separation. Research identifies several evidence-based strategies, including creating physical and social spaces that facilitate serendipitous encounters among diverse resources, deliberately staffing projects with individuals from different backgrounds, establishing processes that systematically evaluate unusual resource combinations, and providing incentives for cross-boundary collaboration. Organizations implementing these practices demonstrate consistently superior innovation performance. The advantages of combinatorial approaches extend beyond immediate innovation to long-term adaptability. Research on organizational resilience demonstrates that entities skilled at recombining resources flexibly navigate disruptions more effectively than those dependent on specific resource configurations. This adaptability stems from their ability to rapidly reconfigure existing assets to address emerging challenges, rather than requiring new resource acquisition. Studies of organizational responses to economic downturns, technological disruptions, and competitive threats consistently show that combinatorial capabilities predict survival and recovery.

Chapter 7: Avoiding the Pitfalls of Overstretching

While stretching resources offers tremendous advantages over chasing, excessive stretching introduces its own hazards. Understanding the boundary conditions where stretching becomes counterproductive represents an essential aspect of resourcefulness. By recognizing and avoiding common overstretching pitfalls, individuals and organizations can maintain the benefits of stretching while minimizing associated risks. The most immediate danger of overstretching manifests as false economy – sacrificing essential quality or capability in pursuit of resource efficiency. Research examining cost-cutting initiatives reveals that organizations frequently damage core functions by applying stretching principles indiscriminately rather than strategically. Studies of product development demonstrate that excessive frugality often compromises attributes customers genuinely value, ultimately reducing rather than enhancing competitive position. Effective stretching requires careful discrimination between value-creating investments and wasteful expenditures rather than across-the-board resource minimization. A second overstretching pitfall involves scope diffusion – pursuing too many initiatives simultaneously with insufficient resources for any. When stretching principles generate early successes, organizations and individuals often expand their ambitions without corresponding resource increases, ultimately spreading capabilities too thin. Research on portfolio management demonstrates that organizations attempting too many projects simultaneously complete fewer initiatives successfully than those maintaining more focused portfolios. Effective stretching requires disciplined prioritization that concentrates resources on the most promising opportunities rather than attempting to accomplish everything with limited means. Burnout represents perhaps the most serious consequence of overstretching, particularly regarding human resources. Studies examining workplace performance consistently show that while moderate challenge enhances engagement and productivity, excessive demands eventually trigger psychological withdrawal, increased errors, and reduced innovation. This pattern appears across professions from healthcare to education to professional services. Sustainable stretching requires balancing resource efficiency with essential renewal and regeneration rather than pursuing continuous maximization. The risks of overstretching increase significantly during transitions between different operating contexts. Research examining organizational change initiatives reveals that capabilities developed for stretching in one environment often prove maladaptive when conditions shift. For example, processes optimized for stable production environments typically fail when applied to highly uncertain innovation contexts. Effective stretching requires recognizing these contextual boundaries and adjusting approaches accordingly rather than applying successful patterns indiscriminately across different situations. Perhaps most subtly, overstretching can reinforce rather than challenge problematic resource assumptions. When stretching becomes an end in itself rather than a means to specific objectives, it paradoxically strengthens the chasing mindset by making resource efficiency the primary goal rather than a pathway to more meaningful outcomes. Research on organizational values demonstrates that companies emphasizing efficiency above all other considerations frequently underperform more balanced competitors over time. Effective stretching maintains focus on ultimate objectives rather than resource minimization itself. Avoiding these pitfalls requires deliberate assessment practices that identify appropriate boundaries for stretching in specific contexts. Research on high-reliability organizations identifies several evidence-based approaches, including establishing clear minimum thresholds for essential capabilities, systematically monitoring early warning signals of overextension, creating feedback mechanisms that capture unintended consequences, and maintaining strategic reserves for unforeseen contingencies. Organizations implementing these practices successfully balance the benefits of stretching with appropriate safeguards against its excesses.

Summary

The fundamental insight that emerges from this analysis is that our approach to resources – not the quantity we possess – primarily determines our success and satisfaction. By shifting from a chasing mindset that constantly seeks more to a stretching orientation that expands the value of what we already have, we unlock remarkable capabilities for innovation, adaptation, and achievement that remain inaccessible to those trapped in the pursuit of additional resources. This perspective transformation doesn't merely offer practical advantages; it fundamentally alters our relationship with work, possessions, and accomplishments – replacing the anxiety of perpetual inadequacy with the confidence that comes from recognizing abundance where others perceive scarcity. The principles of stretching apply universally across contexts from organizational leadership to entrepreneurship to personal development, though their specific manifestations naturally vary with circumstances. While not denying that resources matter, this approach reveals that how we think about, combine, and utilize what we have typically matters far more than how much we possess. For those willing to challenge conventional assumptions about resources, this perspective offers a pathway to simultaneously greater achievement and fulfillment – accomplishing more meaningful objectives while escaping the dissatisfaction inherent in endless chasing. In a world increasingly characterized by resource constraints and rapid change, the capacity to stretch rather than chase may ultimately determine which individuals, organizations, and societies thrive amid complexity and uncertainty.

About Author

Loading...

Scott Sonenshein

Scott Sonenshein is the Henry Gardiner Symonds Professor of Management at Rice University and bestselling author of Stretch: Unlock the Power of Less – And Achieve More Than You Ever Imagined and co-author (with Marie Kondo) of Joy at Work: Organizing Your Professional Life. His award winning research, teaching, and speaking has helped Fortune 500 executives, entrepreneurs, and professionals in industries such as technology, energy, healthcare, retail, education, banking, manufacturing, and non-profits.He holds a PhD in organizational behavior from the University of Michigan, an MPhil from the University of Cambridge, and a BA from the University of Virginia. His research appears in the very top academic journals and has contributed to several topics in management and psychology, including change, creativity, personal growth, social issues, decision making, and influence. Scott sits on five distinguished editorial boards and is a former associate editor of his field’s top publication, the Academy of Management Journal.Scott also worked as a strategy consultant for companies such as Microsoft and AT&T and lived the rise and fall of the dotcom boom while working for a Silicon Valley startup. He serves on the External Advisory Board of McKinsey & Company’s implementation practice.Scott has written for the New York Times, Time Magazine, Fast Company and Harvard Business Review. He has been interviewed on national and local television, NPR stations throughout the country, and has been featured in most major newspapers.Website: https://www.ScottSonenshein.com

Read more