Can't Even

Can't Even Plot Summary

Introduction

Millennial burnout has emerged as a defining feature of an entire generation's experience, transcending individual circumstances to reveal deeper societal fractures. What distinguishes this phenomenon from ordinary exhaustion is its pervasiveness, persistence, and systematic nature. When examining burnout through a generational lens, we uncover not personal failings but structural conditions that have fundamentally altered the relationship between work, identity, and well-being for an entire demographic cohort. The economic precarity, technological acceleration, and cultural pressures facing millennials represent an unprecedented convergence of destabilizing forces. By tracing these interconnected systems—from the shifting nature of work to the collapse of boundaries between professional and personal life—we gain insight into why traditional advice about "work-life balance" consistently fails. The analysis moves beyond superficial cultural critiques to examine how economic structures, workplace expectations, and social institutions have combined to create conditions where burnout becomes not the exception but the rule for an entire generation. Understanding these systemic roots offers not just diagnosis but potential pathways toward meaningful intervention.

Chapter 1: The Economic Precarity Driving Millennial Exhaustion

Economic insecurity forms the foundation of millennial burnout. Unlike previous generations who entered adulthood during periods of relative prosperity, millennials came of age during the greatest economic catastrophe since the Great Depression. The 2008 financial crisis wasn't merely a temporary setback but a transformative event that permanently altered career trajectories, financial security, and life milestones for an entire generation. Student debt stands as perhaps the most visible manifestation of this precarity. With average educational debt reaching unprecedented levels—approximately $37,000 per graduate in the US—millennials begin their working lives with a financial burden their predecessors rarely faced. This debt shapes every subsequent decision, from career choices to housing options, creating a constant background hum of financial anxiety. Even those who manage to secure stable employment find themselves allocating substantial portions of their income toward debt repayment rather than wealth accumulation. Housing insecurity compounds these challenges. Skyrocketing rent in urban centers, where jobs are increasingly concentrated, consumes unprecedented portions of millennial incomes. The traditional milestone of homeownership—once a reliable path to middle-class security—has become unattainable for many, with millennials experiencing the lowest homeownership rates of any generation at comparable ages. This creates not just financial strain but existential uncertainty about fundamental stability. Labor market transformations have further intensified economic vulnerability. The rise of the gig economy, contract work, and diminishing employer benefits have created conditions where millennials work without safety nets. Many cobble together multiple income streams without access to healthcare, paid time off, or retirement benefits. This "precariat" existence means that even those who appear successful on paper often exist mere paychecks away from financial catastrophe. The psychological toll of this constant precarity manifests as persistent anxiety that no amount of hard work seems to alleviate. Intergenerational wealth transfers—or their absence—have widened these economic divides. While some millennials benefit from family financial support for education, housing down payments, or emergency funds, many others navigate economic challenges without such resources. This creates divergent experiences within the generation itself, with race and class backgrounds significantly determining who can access familial safety nets. The resulting inequality means that some millennials struggle not just with their own financial precarity but with supporting parents and extended family members as well. The economic system facing millennials ultimately rewards capital over labor to an unprecedented degree. Despite productivity gains, wage growth remains stagnant while corporate profits soar. This fundamental disconnect between productivity and compensation creates a situation where working harder never seems to yield the promised rewards, fueling a profound sense of disillusionment with economic systems themselves.

Chapter 2: How Work Culture Colonized Every Aspect of Life

The boundaries that once separated work from personal life have systematically eroded for millennials, creating a condition where work colonizes nearly every domain of existence. This colonization occurs not merely through technological means but through profound cultural and psychological shifts in how work is conceptualized and valued. The rise of the "always-on" work culture has transformed evenings, weekends, and even vacations into potential work time. Mobile technologies—initially marketed as tools for greater flexibility—have instead tethered workers to perpetual availability. Email notifications, messaging apps, and collaborative platforms create constant connection to workplace demands, making true disconnection increasingly rare. Studies show millennials check work communications during ostensible "off hours" at significantly higher rates than previous generations, not from enthusiasm but from anxiety about potential consequences of being unresponsive. The ideology of "passion work" has proven particularly effective at facilitating this colonization. The cultural mandate to "do what you love" has transformed jobs into supposed extensions of personal identity and fulfillment. This framing makes resistance to overwork feel like a rejection of one's own passions rather than a reasonable boundary. Jobs once understood primarily as means of economic support have been recast as sources of meaning, purpose, and self-actualization. This rhetorical shift benefits employers tremendously, as workers willingly sacrifice boundaries, compensation, and well-being for work that purportedly reflects their authentic selves. Social media has accelerated work's expansion by creating pressure to monetize hobbies, interests, and relationships. Platforms encourage users to develop "personal brands" and convert leisure activities into potential income streams. What begins as genuine interest often transforms into content creation, affiliate marketing, or side hustles. This commodification of previously non-economic domains means that even activities ostensibly pursued for pleasure become subject to metrics, optimization, and market logic. The result is that true leisure—activities without productive purpose—becomes increasingly rare. Physical spaces once separate from work have similarly been colonized. Cafes, living rooms, and bedrooms have transformed into makeshift offices. The architectural and psychological boundaries that once separated work environments from personal spaces have collapsed, making it difficult to mentally disconnect even when not actively working. Home, once conceptualized as refuge from professional demands, now frequently doubles as workspace, especially after pandemic-driven remote work normalized this arrangement. The social dimensions of work have expanded beyond traditional workplace relationships. Professional networking permeates social gatherings, turning friendships and community connections into potential career resources. Even family relationships become implicated in work culture as parents focus on developing children's "human capital" from increasingly early ages. The result is that genuinely non-instrumental social connections—relationships valued solely for their own sake rather than potential professional benefits—become increasingly scarce in millennial lives.

Chapter 3: Technology's Role in Perpetuating Constant Productivity

Digital technologies have fundamentally transformed millennial relationships with work, time, and attention in ways that actively perpetuate burnout. Far from merely facilitating overwork, these technologies have become sophisticated engines of constant engagement, designed to maximize productivity while minimizing resistance. Smartphones represent the most visible technological driver of burnout, creating unprecedented capabilities for work to intrude into every moment. The average millennial checks their phone approximately 150 times daily, with work communications constituting a significant portion of these interactions. This constant checking creates cognitive fragmentation, as attention shifts rapidly between tasks, contexts, and mental modes. The resulting cognitive load prevents true concentration and recovery, as the mind remains partially engaged with work concerns even during nominal downtime. This continuous partial attention represents a particularly draining cognitive state, depleting mental resources without providing the satisfaction of full engagement. Productivity applications and workflows designed to maximize efficiency paradoxically increase workloads. Tools promising to streamline tasks frequently create new forms of labor—learning systems, maintaining digital organization, processing notifications, and managing ever-expanding digital workspaces. Each technological solution typically introduces new points of potential failure, requiring vigilance and management. This creates a treadmill effect where workers constantly adopt new systems and workflows without experiencing genuine relief from workload pressures. The attention economy has further monetized and weaponized distraction in ways particularly harmful to millennial well-being. Social media platforms, news sites, and applications employ sophisticated psychological techniques—variable rewards, social validation, fear of missing out—to maximize engagement. These mechanisms target the same neural pathways involved in addiction, creating powerful compulsions to check, scroll, and respond. The resulting attentional fragmentation makes sustained focus increasingly difficult, creating a destructive cycle where concentration becomes more valuable yet harder to achieve. Surveillance technologies in the workplace amplify productivity pressures through continuous monitoring. Employee tracking software, productivity metrics, and digital performance monitoring create conditions of perpetual evaluation. Unlike previous generations who experienced periodic performance reviews, millennials often work under systems tracking keystrokes, active hours, response times, and output quantities in real-time. This constant evaluation creates psychological conditions where workers feel perpetually observed and judged, intensifying pressure to demonstrate productivity through visible activity rather than meaningful outcomes. The collapse of spatial boundaries through technology has eliminated crucial psychological transitions between contexts. Commutes, physical office departures, and other transitional moments once provided natural endpoints to workdays. Digital technologies have erased these boundaries, creating conditions where work can—and often does—continue indefinitely. Without these transitional cues, millennials struggle to psychologically separate from work demands, resulting in rumination, sleep disturbances, and diminished recovery. The false promise of technological efficiency ultimately creates conditions where millennials work more rather than less. Despite massive technological advances promising to reduce workloads, average working hours have increased rather than decreased for knowledge workers. The productivity gains generated by technology have primarily benefited organizations rather than workers, whose reward for increased efficiency is typically expanded responsibilities rather than increased compensation or reduced hours.

Chapter 4: The Myth of 'Do What You Love' and Career Expectations

The cultural mandate to "do what you love" has transformed from inspiring advice into a destructive ideology that significantly contributes to millennial burnout. This seemingly benign encouragement conceals profound shifts in how work is conceptualized, valued, and compensated. The historical evolution of this concept reveals its ideological function. While previous generations largely viewed work as a means to support life's non-work dimensions, the "passion paradigm" reframes labor as the central source of identity and fulfillment. This shift coincided with economic changes requiring workers to accept declining compensation, job security, and benefits. By elevating work to a calling rather than a contract, this ideology encourages workers to accept material sacrifices in exchange for supposed meaning and purpose. For millennials specifically, this framework created unrealistic expectations about career trajectories. Educational institutions, media narratives, and parental guidance all reinforced the notion that finding the perfect alignment between personal passion and professional opportunity would yield both fulfillment and financial stability. Graduates entered the workforce expecting careers that would reward authentic self-expression while providing economic security. When confronted with workplace realities of tedium, hierarchy, and financial precarity, many experienced not just disappointment but profound identity crises. The passion paradigm systematically devalues essential labor by creating hierarchies of meaningful work. Jobs maintaining physical infrastructure, providing care, or meeting basic needs are implicitly positioned as less fulfilling than creative, technological, or knowledge work. This creates both practical problems—labor shortages in essential sectors—and psychological ones, as workers in these fields must contend with cultural messages suggesting their contributions lack inherent value. The resulting status anxiety compounds burnout, particularly for those providing crucial but undervalued services. Labor exploitation finds particular effectiveness through the passion framework. When workers identify deeply with their roles, they become more willing to accept problematic conditions—unpaid overtime, insufficient compensation, harassment, or unsafe environments—to maintain their connection to supposedly meaningful work. Industries with the strongest "passion" narratives—education, healthcare, nonprofits, arts, media—frequently feature the most exploitative labor practices precisely because workers' emotional investment can be leveraged against their material interests. The concept of "hope labor" emerges as a particularly potent manifestation of this dynamic. Millennials routinely accept unpaid internships, underpaid entry-level positions, and exploitative gig work based on promises that these sacrifices will eventually lead to stable, fulfilling careers. This future-oriented sacrifice becomes particularly destructive when the promised stability never materializes, leaving workers in perpetual states of temporary sacrifice for continuously deferred rewards. Social media amplifies these dynamics by showcasing idealized representations of passion-driven careers while concealing their underlying conditions. Influencers, entrepreneurs, and creative professionals present carefully curated narratives emphasizing freedom, fulfillment, and alignment with personal values. These representations rarely acknowledge financial support structures, privilege, luck, or the considerable unpaid labor sustaining these careers. For millennials consuming these narratives, the gap between these idealized representations and their lived experiences creates profound dissatisfaction and self-blame.

Chapter 5: Parenting in an Era of Economic Anxiety

Millennial parenting experiences have been profoundly shaped by the intersection of economic precarity and intensified parenting expectations. This collision has created uniquely challenging conditions that significantly contribute to burnout among those raising children. The economic context of millennial parenting differs dramatically from previous generations. While Baby Boomer parents typically established careers and acquired assets before having children, millennials often start families while still burdened by student debt, housing insecurity, and unstable employment. This financial precarity creates baseline stress that permeates every aspect of parenting. Basic decisions about childcare, housing, healthcare, and education occur against a backdrop of economic vulnerability that previous generations rarely experienced at comparable life stages. Childcare represents perhaps the most acute manifestation of this economic strain. With costs averaging $8,700 to $13,000 annually per child in many regions, quality care often consumes unsustainable portions of household income. Yet most workplace structures still operate on the outdated assumption that families have a dedicated caregiver at home. The resulting childcare gap forces impossible choices: paying exorbitant costs that prevent financial stability, cobbling together inconsistent care arrangements, or having one parent reduce or abandon career pursuits entirely. Each option carries significant economic and psychological costs. Simultaneously, cultural expectations for "good parenting" have intensified dramatically. Contemporary parenting norms demand unprecedented investments of time, attention, and resources in children's development. Activities once considered enrichment extras—specialized classes, developmental interventions, educational experiences—have become baseline expectations. Social media amplifies these pressures by showcasing idealized parenting moments while concealing the labor, resources, and privilege sustaining them. Parents face constant implicit messaging that anything less than total devotion to optimizing children's experiences constitutes negligence. The gendered dimensions of these pressures create particularly acute burnout conditions for mothers. Despite significant cultural shifts in parenting ideals, women continue performing approximately 65% of childcare responsibilities even when employed full-time. This "second shift" significantly constrains recovery time and creates conditions of perpetual task-switching that intensifies cognitive load. The expectation that mothers simultaneously excel professionally while remaining primarily responsible for domestic management creates impossible demands on time, attention, and energy. The psychological burden of carrying what French cartoonist Emma terms "the mental load"—the cognitive work of anticipating needs, coordinating schedules, tracking development, managing emotions, and orchestrating family logistics—falls disproportionately on mothers. This invisible labor rarely receives recognition as work despite consuming substantial mental bandwidth. The constant background processing of family management creates conditions where even nominal downtime remains mentally occupied with anticipatory planning and coordination. Class anxiety further intensifies these pressures as parents attempt to secure children's future prospects amidst growing inequality. The awareness that economic mobility has declined creates heightened pressure to provide educational advantages, enrichment opportunities, and social connections that might protect children from downward mobility. For middle-class millennials particularly, parenting becomes permeated with anxiety about maintaining class position across generations. The resulting "concerted cultivation" approach transforms childhood into a series of strategic investments in future human capital rather than a developmental stage with intrinsic value.

Chapter 6: How Social Structures Maintain Burnout Culture

Burnout persists not merely through individual choices or workplace policies but through interconnected social structures that systematically undermine well-being. These structures create conditions where exhaustion becomes normalized, resistance appears futile, and collective solutions remain elusive. Healthcare systems play a central role in maintaining burnout culture, particularly in countries without universal coverage. When access to medical care depends on employment, workers face powerful disincentives to reduce hours, change positions, or establish boundaries. Fear of losing insurance creates a form of employment captivity, especially for those with chronic conditions or dependents. This system structurally rewards overwork by making healthcare contingent on maintaining specific employment arrangements, regardless of their sustainability. The resulting dynamic keeps many millennials trapped in depleting work situations simply to maintain basic health security. Housing policies similarly entrench burnout through spatial arrangements that maximize commuting time while minimizing community connections. Zoning regulations, transportation infrastructure, and development patterns have created environments where affordable housing exists far from employment centers. The resulting long commutes—often exceeding two hours daily—consume potential recovery time while increasing stress. Additionally, the transient nature of millennial housing situations, driven by affordability crises and job insecurity, disrupts the formation of stable community ties that might otherwise provide social support buffering against burnout. Educational institutions perpetuate burnout through credentialing systems that create ever-escalating qualification requirements without corresponding increases in compensation or stability. Bachelor's degrees, once sufficient for professional entry, have given way to expectations for master's degrees, specialized certifications, and continuous professional development—typically funded by workers themselves. This credential inflation creates conditions of perpetual inadequacy where workers must constantly pursue additional qualifications simply to maintain competitive positioning. The resulting educational debt further restricts options for reducing work commitments. Media and technology platforms normalize burnout through algorithmic amplification of productivity culture. Content promoting hustle mentalities, optimization techniques, and extreme work ethics receives disproportionate visibility through engagement-based distribution systems. Meanwhile, critiques of work structures or alternatives to productivity-centered living remain marginalized. The constant exposure to "hustle porn" and productivity influencers creates distorted perceptions of normal work patterns while stigmatizing necessary rest as laziness or indulgence. Political structures maintain burnout through the systematic undermining of collective power. Declining union membership, restrictive labor laws, and the classification of workers as independent contractors all weaken traditional mechanisms for establishing reasonable working conditions. When workers lack collective bargaining power, individual resistance becomes professionally risky, creating conditions where each person must individually navigate exploitative expectations without institutional support. This atomization makes challenging structural drivers of burnout exceptionally difficult. Gender and racial hierarchies intensify burnout through unequal distribution of domestic and emotional labor. Women and people of color consistently perform disproportionate amounts of unpaid care work, community support, and emotional management alongside paid employment. This unrecognized labor significantly reduces recovery time while increasing overall workload. Additionally, the need to navigate discrimination, microaggressions, and hostile environments creates additional cognitive and emotional burdens that accelerate burnout among marginalized groups. The interconnection between these structures creates particularly powerful burnout conditions. Each reinforces the others, creating interlocking systems that normalize exhaustion while pathologizing resistance. Breaking free from burnout therefore requires not just individual boundary-setting but collective challenges to these entrenched structural arrangements.

Chapter 7: Moving Beyond Individual Solutions to Systemic Change

The pervasive framing of burnout as an individual problem requiring personal solutions fundamentally misdiagnoses its nature. While self-care practices, boundary-setting techniques, and productivity hacks may provide temporary relief, they ultimately fail to address the systemic conditions generating burnout in the first place. Meaningful intervention requires shifting focus from individual adaptation to collective transformation of the structures perpetuating exhaustion. Labor policy represents perhaps the most direct intervention point for addressing millennial burnout. Countries implementing shorter workweeks, mandatory vacation policies, and robust parental leave have demonstrated significant improvements in both productivity and well-being. When Microsoft Japan experimented with a four-day workweek, productivity increased by 40% while employee satisfaction rose dramatically. Similar experiments across diverse industries consistently show that reduced working hours typically improve rather than diminish productivity while significantly decreasing burnout. These findings challenge the fundamental assumption that maximum hours equal maximum output. Technology governance offers another critical intervention area. Current digital environments prioritize engagement metrics that benefit platforms while depleting user attention and well-being. Regulatory frameworks could require design practices that respect cognitive limitations, provide meaningful disconnection opportunities, and prevent exploitative manipulation of psychological vulnerabilities. Additionally, establishing right-to-disconnect policies would create crucial boundaries between work and personal life, particularly important in increasingly remote work environments where spatial separation has disappeared. Economic restructuring to address precarity would significantly reduce burnout's primary driver. Policies decoupling basic needs from employment—including universal healthcare, affordable housing initiatives, and enhanced social safety nets—would reduce the existential anxiety fueling overwork. Student debt forgiveness would similarly alleviate a major source of financial pressure forcing millennials into unsustainable work patterns. These interventions would create conditions where work choices stem from genuine preference rather than desperation. Childcare infrastructure represents a particularly high-leverage intervention point. Universal, affordable, quality childcare would dramatically reduce parental burnout while enabling more equitable workforce participation. Countries implementing robust childcare systems demonstrate significantly lower burnout rates among parents, particularly mothers. This infrastructure would address one of the most acute pain points in millennial life while supporting both economic productivity and family well-being. Cultural narratives around work require equally significant transformation. Moving beyond the "do what you love" paradigm toward frameworks valuing boundaries, sufficiency, and multiple sources of meaning would create psychological space for resisting overwork. Elevating narratives celebrating rest, connection, and non-productive activities as valuable in themselves would counter the cultural glorification of hustle and sacrifice. Media, educational institutions, and workplaces all play crucial roles in either reinforcing or challenging these dominant narratives. Collective organizing provides essential leverage for implementing these changes. While individual resistance to burnout culture carries significant professional risk, collective action creates protected space for challenging destructive norms. New forms of labor organizing emerging in digital workplaces, creative industries, and contingent work arrangements demonstrate possibilities for solidarity even in atomized environments. These efforts recognize that sustainable work conditions will come through collective demands rather than individual negotiation. The pathway beyond burnout ultimately requires recognizing our interdependence rather than doubling down on self-sufficiency myths. Neither technological solutions nor personal productivity strategies can solve problems rooted in economic structures, cultural values, and power arrangements. Moving beyond individualized burnout interventions means embracing collective responsibility for creating systems where human flourishing—not maximum productivity—becomes the central organizing principle.

Summary

Millennial burnout emerges not from personal failing or generational weakness but from profound structural shifts that have fundamentally transformed work, economic security, and social relationships. The confluence of economic precarity, technological acceleration, and intensified expectations has created conditions where exhaustion becomes not just common but nearly inescapable. Through systematic examination of these interconnected forces, we see how individual experiences of depletion reflect broader systemic failures rather than personal inadequacy. The path forward requires recognizing burnout as a political problem demanding collective solutions rather than a personal challenge requiring better self-management. This perspective shift opens possibilities for meaningful intervention through policy change, cultural transformation, and renewed solidarity. By understanding burnout's systemic roots, we gain both compassion for individual struggles and clarity about necessary structural changes. Moving beyond superficial productivity fixes toward substantive reorganization of work, care, technology, and community offers hope not just for alleviating symptoms but for creating conditions where genuine flourishing becomes possible for all, not merely the privileged few.

About Author

Loading...

Anne Helen Petersen

Anne Helen Petersen has an actual Ph.D. in celebrity gossip and writes longform pieces for BuzzFeed.

Read more

Related Books by Anne Helen Petersen

Loading...

Out of Office

Anne Helen Petersen

The Big Problem and Bigger Promise of Working from Home

★★★½☆3.7