How Google Works

How Google Works Plot Summary

Introduction

In the rapidly evolving landscape of the Internet Century, traditional business wisdom falls short. How can companies thrive amidst unprecedented technological disruption? What leadership principles actually work when information is ubiquitous, connectivity is global, and computing power is virtually infinite? These questions form the foundation of a revolutionary approach to management pioneered at Google. The core thesis presented is that successful twenty-first-century organizations must be built around "smart creatives" - employees who combine technical knowledge, business expertise, and creative energy. Traditional management frameworks designed for controlling information and reducing risk actually stifle these talented individuals. Instead, leaders must create environments where innovation flourishes organically, decisions are based on data rather than hierarchy, and the best ideas win regardless of their source. Through examining Google's journey from startup to global powerhouse, we gain structured insights into creating cultures that foster excellence, strategies built on technical insights, hiring practices that attract extraordinary talent, and decision-making processes that balance speed with thoughtfulness.

Chapter 1: Culture: Creating an Environment Where Smart Creatives Thrive

Corporate culture isn't something that just happens - it must be intentionally crafted, particularly for organizations seeking to attract and retain smart creatives. These highly capable individuals place culture at the top of their priority list when considering employment opportunities because they need to care deeply about where they work to be effective. A successful culture for smart creatives begins with authentic values that truly guide decision-making, not just platitudes displayed on office walls. At Google, this culture manifests through several key principles. Physical space reflects values - offices are intentionally crowded to maximize interactions, teams are functionally integrated rather than siloed, and messiness is tolerated as a sign of creativity. Hierarchy is minimized through the "rule of seven," which requires managers to have at least seven direct reports, making micromanagement nearly impossible. Information flows freely, with even board-level communications shared company-wide, fostering transparency and trust. Perhaps most importantly, a thriving culture for smart creatives embraces the power of the "HiPPO" (Highest-Paid Person's Opinion) being challenged. When the best idea wins regardless of who proposes it, innovation flourishes. This meritocracy extends to decision-making as well, with committees rather than individuals making key hiring and promotion decisions. The process may feel messier and more chaotic than traditional corporate environments, but this is precisely the point - the business should always outrun its processes. The culture must also balance freedom with accountability. Google's "Don't be evil" mantra serves as a cultural lodestar, empowering employees to question decisions that might compromise company values. When an engineer felt a proposed advertising feature was "evil," the entire team stopped to reassess, ultimately deciding against implementing it. This ability for anyone to "pull the cord" and stop production when values are at risk creates an environment where smart creatives feel both empowered and responsible. Creating this culture isn't easy, especially for established companies. It requires leaders to embrace principles that may feel counterintuitive - giving up control, tolerating chaos, and putting enormous trust in their people. However, this cultural foundation becomes the rails that keep the organization on track even as it moves at unprecedented speed through uncharted territory.

Chapter 2: Strategy: Building a Plan on Technical Insights

Traditional business strategy typically focuses on leveraging competitive advantages to expand into adjacent markets or implementing clever tactics in pricing, marketing, and distribution. However, in the Internet Century, these approaches yield only incremental improvements. True innovation requires a strategy built upon technical insights - novel ways of applying technology or design that significantly reduce costs or increase functionality, creating products that are demonstrably better than alternatives. A technical insight strategy begins with understanding that planning should be fluid while the foundation remains stable. Plans will inevitably change as teams discover new information, but the underlying principles guiding those plans must be rock-solid. Google Search, for instance, was built on the technical insight that analyzing links between websites could determine page quality far better than examining page content alone. This insight provided a foundation that could support countless iterations while maintaining a clear direction. The elements of this approach include betting on technology trends, optimizing for growth rather than immediate revenue, and building platforms that improve with scale. Successful Internet Century companies recognize that three powerful trends - ubiquitous information, global connectivity, and cloud computing - have fundamentally shifted the competitive landscape. They exploit these trends by creating products that solve real problems in novel ways, then grow them rapidly to global scale before competitors can respond. Consider Google's acquisition of the mapping company Keyhole. When asked how this purchase would generate revenue, the answer was honestly "We don't know yet, but we'll figure it out." The team focused on creating an exceptional user experience with Google Earth, trusting that monetization would follow. Eventually, someone realized that users downloading Google Earth might also be interested in the Google Toolbar, which contained a search box that generated significant revenue. This user-focused approach ultimately proved more profitable than forcing premature monetization. The strategy also emphasizes openness rather than control wherever possible. Open platforms scale more quickly by harnessing outside talent and innovation. Android, for example, is free for anyone to use, modify, and build upon. This approach sacrifices control for scale and innovation, allowing the platform to grow exponentially and in ways that could never have been predicted internally. The ecosystem becomes larger than any single company could build alone. This approach requires courage - the willingness to focus on users rather than immediate profits, to open platforms rather than control them, and to let great products grow organically rather than forcing predetermined business models upon them. But for companies seeking to create truly revolutionary products, it offers a powerful alternative to traditional strategic thinking.

Chapter 3: Talent: Hiring and Nurturing Smart Creatives

The single most important activity for any organization in the Internet Century is hiring. No amount of strategic brilliance or cultural excellence can overcome mediocre talent. Smart creatives - those individuals who combine technical knowledge, business savvy, and creative energy - are the engine of innovation, and attracting them requires a fundamentally different approach to recruitment, evaluation, and retention. Traditional hiring focuses on experience and credentials, prioritizing candidates who have previously performed similar roles. This backward-looking approach misses the mark entirely. Instead, successful organizations must search for learning animals - people with the intellect to handle massive change and the character to embrace it. These individuals may not have the perfect resume, but they possess passion, intelligence, and the ability to adapt quickly in rapidly evolving environments. The hiring process itself must be peer-based rather than hierarchical. At Google, decisions are made by committees, not individuals, creating a system that naturally counters the human tendency to hire people less capable than oneself. Interview questions should focus on problem-solving ability rather than rote knowledge: "Could you teach me something complicated I don't know?" or "If I were to look at your browser history, what would I learn about you?" The goal is to understand how candidates think, not just what they know. Once hired, smart creatives need environments that challenge and retain them. This means offering disproportionate rewards for exceptional performance - paying outstanding people outstandingly well, regardless of title or tenure. It also means focusing retention efforts on stars, innovators, and leaders, recognizing that their departure can trigger a talent exodus. When valued smart creatives consider leaving, leaders should advocate for their long-term success, not just the company's short-term needs. Interestingly, managing departures well is as important as retention. When Google's Jessica Ewing left to pursue her passion for writing despite having a bright future at the company, leadership respected her decision. This created goodwill and reinforced the culture of prioritizing individual growth alongside company success. Similarly, Google found that most 20% projects (where employees spend one-fifth of their time on self-directed work) yield more value in personal development than in direct product outcomes. Perhaps most counterintuitively, the approach requires embracing diversity of thought, hiring people you might not personally like but who bring valuable opposing perspectives. As one executive noted, "You have to work with people you don't like" because homogeneity breeds failure. The multiplicity of viewpoints from different backgrounds generates insights that cannot be taught and helps prevent the myopia that afflicts teams that think too similarly.

Chapter 4: Decision-Making: Consensus Through Data and Debate

In the Internet Century, decisions must be made rapidly while still leveraging the collective intelligence of the organization. This requires reinventing the decision-making process itself. Traditional approaches either concentrate power at the top (military-style command) or diffuse it completely (consensus paralysis). The Google model charts a different course: driving decisions through data-informed debate that involves the right people regardless of their position in the hierarchy. At the heart of this approach is a commitment to deciding with data. When abundant information is available, opinions must be supported by evidence. This begins with properly defining problems - as philosopher John Dewey noted, "a problem well put is half solved." Google meeting rooms typically have two projectors: one for videoconferencing and one for data. Presenters don't rely on words alone but show the facts that support their position, allowing everyone to work from the same information. However, data alone isn't sufficient. True consensus requires constructive conflict - what might be called "the obligation to dissent." When people merely nod along with leadership's views (the "bobblehead yes" phenomenon), decisions appear to have support but actually lack commitment. Leaders must actively draw out disagreement, calling on quiet team members and creating environments where challenging the highest-paid person's opinion is not just permitted but expected. The decision-maker's role in this process shifts from dictating outcomes to orchestrating the debate. They must set clear deadlines, ensure all relevant perspectives are heard, and then make the call when sufficient information has been gathered. After a decision, they should acknowledge the validity in opposing viewpoints with the powerful phrase "You're both right" - recognizing that complex issues rarely have single correct answers. This maintains relationships while still moving forward decisively. This approach was exemplified in Google's difficult decision to exit China in 2010 following sophisticated cyber attacks. Though CEO Eric Schmidt believed staying in the market was best for business, founders Larry Page and Sergey Brin felt Google should no longer comply with Chinese censorship requirements. Rather than simply overruling his team, Schmidt facilitated a thorough debate, ensuring every perspective was heard before the final decision to withdraw was made. The process preserved unity despite profound disagreement. Meetings themselves must be reimagined to support this decision model. Every meeting needs a clear owner responsible for setting objectives, determining participants, and circulating decisions afterward. Attendance should be limited to those who genuinely need to be there - no more than eight to ten people. And participants must actually be present, not multitasking on their devices. These seemingly small details create the conditions for quality debate and effective decisions. The ultimate goal is decisions that are both better and faster - leveraging collective wisdom without sacrificing speed. By creating a culture where data trumps opinion, dissent is valued, and the process itself is respected, organizations can make decisions that reflect their best thinking while still moving at Internet speed.

Chapter 5: Communication: Transparent Information Flow

In traditional organizations, information flows like a waterfall from the top of the hierarchy downward, with each level carefully filtering what passes to those below. This approach treats information as a source of power and control. However, in the Internet Century, information must flow freely throughout the organization for smart creatives to thrive. The role of leaders shifts from hoarding information to optimizing its flow - becoming what one Google engineer described as "an expensive router." The foundation of effective communication is defaulting to open. Google shares its quarterly board report with all employees, redacting only what is legally required to remain confidential. The same transparency applies to OKRs (Objectives and Key Results), which every employee posts company-wide. This radical openness builds trust, improves quality (people produce better work when they know it will be widely seen), and empowers smart creatives with the context they need to make good decisions. Leaders must balance quantity with quality in their communications. The advice "repetition doesn't spoil the prayer" acknowledges that important messages need to be consistently reinforced, but repetition alone isn't enough. Communications should reinforce core themes, offer fresh perspectives, inspire interest, and maintain authenticity. When Eric Schmidt visited Iraq and shared his observations with the company, it had nothing to do with Google's business but everything to do with connecting with employees as citizens of the world. This personal touch made his subsequent business communications more credible. Effective communication also requires creating safe spaces for truth-telling. Google's TGIF meetings feature a system called "Dory" where employees can submit questions anonymously and vote on others' submissions. The highest-voted questions, often the toughest ones, are addressed first, preventing leaders from cherry-picking easy topics. When bad news emerges, the focus should be on learning rather than blame, following a "climb, confess, comply" model borrowed from aviation: get out of danger, honestly explain what happened, and implement corrections. The hardest aspect of communication for many leaders is actually listening. Executives often prepare extensively for presentations but enter meetings with no preparation to receive information. This asymmetry leads to missed opportunities. Great leaders actively seek uncomfortable truths, recognizing that bad news only gets worse when delayed. They start conversations by being personally vulnerable, creating psychological safety for others to speak candidly. Perhaps most importantly, effective communication requires meaningful face-to-face interaction. While technology facilitates global connectivity, the most important conversations still happen in person. Google's practice of starting staff meetings with trip reports - where someone shares observations from recent travels - creates natural opportunities for these human connections. Similarly, regularly scheduled "office hours" where anyone can drop in for a conversation helps bridge hierarchical divides and ensures information flows in all directions, not just from the top down.

Chapter 6: Innovation: Fostering Creativity in a Structured Environment

Innovation isn't something that can be commanded from above or delegated to a designated department. It emerges organically from environments that allow smart creatives to explore, experiment, and occasionally fail. The role of leadership is not to mandate innovation but to create conditions where it naturally occurs - what might be called a "primordial ooze" from which new ideas can evolve. This evolutionary approach stands in contrast to attempts at top-down control. When companies appoint "Chief Innovation Officers" or create elaborate innovation councils with formal submission processes, they typically achieve the opposite of their intention. Innovation resists traditional management tactics. As Google learned when one employee turned down the role of "head of innovation" at another company, "Innovative people do not need to be told to do it, they need to be allowed to do it." The structure supporting innovation begins with understanding context. Google[x], the team working on ambitious projects like self-driving cars, uses a simple Venn diagram to evaluate potential ideas: they must address huge challenges, propose radically different solutions, and leverage technologies that are at least feasible. Projects like the balloon-powered Internet service Project Loon check all three boxes, providing clear parameters for determining which moonshots are worth pursuing. Within this framework, several key practices enable innovation to flourish. The 70/20/10 resource allocation model ensures that while 70% of resources go to core business and 20% to emerging opportunities, 10% remains dedicated to truly new ideas. This creates space for experimentation while acknowledging that the core business deserves primary attention. Similarly, Google's famous "20% time" gives individuals freedom to pursue projects outside their job descriptions, recognizing that sometimes the best ideas come from unexpected sources. Setting ambitious goals paradoxically enhances creativity. By establishing OKRs (Objectives and Key Results) that are deliberately challenging - with full success being nearly unattainable - organizations push teams to think beyond incremental improvements. When scoring 70% on well-constructed objectives is better than 100% on timid ones, people naturally raise their ambitions and explore more innovative approaches. Perhaps most importantly, innovation requires a culture that embraces intelligent failure. When Google Wave, a communications platform, failed to gain traction despite considerable hype, the company canceled it quickly rather than pouring in additional resources. Team members weren't stigmatized but were actively recruited for other projects, recognizing that their experience made them more valuable, not less. This approach ensures that failure becomes a learning opportunity rather than a career-ending event. The process culminates in a "ship and iterate" mentality that prioritizes getting products to market quickly, then improving them based on real-world feedback. This stands in contrast to the traditional approach of perfecting products before launch. By shipping early versions of Chrome with minimal marketing, Google could gather user data to guide improvements, only investing heavily in promotion once the product had proven itself successful.

Chapter 7: Growth: Scaling Organizations in the Internet Century

The fundamental challenge for organizations in the Internet Century is how to maintain the agility and innovation of a startup while growing to global scale. Traditional corporations add layers of management and process as they expand, creating bureaucracies that stifle the very qualities that made them successful. A new approach to scaling is required - one that preserves the creative energy of small teams while harnessing the resources and reach of large enterprises. The foundation of successful scaling lies in understanding that hypergrowth creates inevitable chaos, and attempting to eliminate this chaos through rigid processes actually hinders progress. As racing driver Mario Andretti noted, "If everything seems under control, you're just not going fast enough." Instead of focusing on control, leaders should embrace a "bias for action" - making decisions quickly even with incomplete information, then adjusting course as needed. This prevents the paralysis that occurs when organizations attempt to plan everything perfectly. Communication structures must evolve as organizations grow, but the principle of transparency remains constant. Google's approach of sharing board materials with all employees works whether the company has 100 people or 100,000. Similarly, the practice of having executives regularly present their OKRs (Objectives and Key Results) to the entire company maintains alignment even as teams multiply. These mechanisms ensure that everyone understands company priorities without requiring bureaucratic cascades of information. Talent management becomes increasingly critical at scale. The hiring bar must remain consistently high, even when growth creates pressure to fill positions quickly. Google instituted a multi-level review process for all hiring decisions, with founders personally approving each offer for years. This seeming inefficiency actually protected the company's most valuable asset - its culture of excellence. Similarly, performance management must continue to reward exceptional contributions disproportionately, preventing the mediocrity that often accompanies growth. Decision-making processes must be reimagined to maintain speed at scale. By creating clear ownership for decisions and establishing frameworks like "disagree and commit" (where debate is encouraged but everyone supports the final decision), organizations can make high-quality decisions quickly even with thousands of stakeholders. The 70/20/10 resource allocation model scales effectively because it establishes clear priorities while still creating space for experimentation. Perhaps most importantly, scaling requires leaders to recognize when to get out of the way. Eric Schmidt noted that as Google grew, he made fewer decisions rather than more, focusing only on the most critical issues while empowering teams to handle everything else. This counterintuitive approach - giving up control to gain speed - runs against traditional management instincts but proves essential in the Internet Century. The companies that successfully navigate this scaling challenge achieve something remarkable: combining the creative freedom of small organizations with the global impact of large ones. They create environments where smart creatives can do their best work without bureaucratic constraints, while still channeling that creativity toward cohesive objectives that transform industries and improve lives around the world.

Summary

The fundamental insight threading through this framework is that leadership in the Internet Century requires a complete reinvention of how we build and run organizations. Success no longer comes from controlling information, processes, or people, but from creating environments where smart creatives can thrive. When leaders focus on culture over control, technical insights over market research, learning animals over experienced specialists, consensus over hierarchy, transparency over information hoarding, and evolutionary innovation over top-down planning, they unlock unprecedented potential for growth and impact. This approach represents more than just a set of management techniques - it acknowledges a profound shift in how value is created in our increasingly connected, information-rich world. As technology continues to accelerate change across industries, the capacity to attract and empower exceptional talent becomes the primary competitive advantage. Organizations that embrace these principles won't just survive disruption, they'll lead it, creating new possibilities that we can barely imagine today. For leaders willing to challenge traditional wisdom and build truly twenty-first-century organizations, the opportunity isn't just to succeed in business but to fundamentally improve how we work, innovate, and solve the world's most pressing problems.

About Author

Loading...

Eric Schmidt

Read more

Related Books by Eric Schmidt

Loading...

The Age of AI

Eric Schmidt

And Our Human Future

★★★☆☆3.5

Loading...

Trillion Dollar Coach

Eric Schmidt

The Leadership Playbook of Silicon Valley's Bill Campbell

★★★½☆4.0

Loading...

Bet on Yourself

Eric Schmidt

Recognize, Own, and Implement Breakthrough Opportunities

★★★½☆3.8