Technofeudalism

Technofeudalism Plot Summary

Introduction

Capitalism, long considered the dominant economic system of our time, may already be dead. What has replaced it is not the socialist paradise many hoped for, but a new form of feudalism powered by technology. This revolutionary thesis challenges conventional understanding of our current economic reality and offers a compelling framework to make sense of seemingly disparate phenomena: from the apparent disconnect between stock markets and real economies to the unprecedented power of Big Tech platforms over our lives. Through a combination of political economy analysis, historical comparisons, and technological insight, we are guided through the transformation of traditional capital into "cloud capital" - a new form of power that modifies behavior and extracts value in ways fundamentally different from capitalism. The analysis illuminates how central bank policies after 2008, combined with the privatization of the internet, created conditions for this transformation. By tracing these developments and their implications for democracy, geopolitics, and personal freedom, we gain not only a deeper understanding of our present circumstances but also glimpse potential paths of resistance against a system that has rendered us all "cloud serfs."

Chapter 1: The Transformation from Capitalism to Technofeudalism

The revolutionary thesis at the heart of this analysis is that capitalism is already dead. Not merely transformed or mutated, but replaced by a fundamentally different system: technofeudalism. This transformation was driven by two crucial developments that together changed the nature of our economic system: the privatization of the internet by America's and China's Big Tech companies, and the unprecedented monetary policies deployed by Western governments and central banks after the 2008 financial crisis. This shift represents the next logical step in history's economic evolution. Just as feudalism eventually gave way to capitalism, capitalism has now been superseded by technofeudalism. What makes this transition different is that it occurred largely unnoticed, obscured by our preoccupation with more immediate crises: debt worries, the pandemic, wars, and climate emergencies. These distractions prevented us from recognizing the fundamental change in the economic power structures governing our lives. The transition to technofeudalism is not about what technology might do to us in the future through AI, autonomous robots, or some version of the metaverse. Rather, it concerns what has already happened to capitalism - and thus to society - through the everyday devices we all use: our laptops and smartphones. Combined with post-2008 monetary policies, these technologies have quietly revolutionized how power is wielded and how wealth is created and distributed. In capitalism, markets and profits served as the twin pillars of the system. Under technofeudalism, these have been evicted from the center of our economic and social system and replaced with digital platforms that function as fiefdoms rather than markets, and with rent extraction rather than profit generation. This shift represents not an intensification of capitalism but its replacement with something that operates according to fundamentally different principles. The essential argument is that technofeudalism has demolished capitalism's foundational elements by transferring enormous power to those who control the cloud-based digital infrastructure upon which all aspects of modern life increasingly depend. This infrastructure enables unprecedented behavior modification, data extraction, and wealth concentration, creating relationships of dependency and exploitation reminiscent of feudal arrangements, albeit in technologically advanced form.

Chapter 2: Cloud Capital: The New Means of Behavioral Modification

The concept of "cloud capital" stands at the center of technofeudalism. Unlike traditional capital goods, which enhanced productivity through physical properties, cloud capital represents a transformative mutation that incorporates a third nature beyond the physical and commanding aspects of conventional capital. This third nature grants its owners unprecedented power to modify behavior, extract value, and bypass markets altogether. Cloud capital functions as a produced means of behavioral modification, operating through algorithms that learn and adapt based on our interactions with them. Unlike Don Draper's advertising strategies from the Mad Men era, which could only implant manufactured desires in our minds in a one-way fashion, cloud capital establishes a permanently active two-way relationship. When we train algorithms like Alexa to serve our needs, they simultaneously train us - creating an infinite regressive loop of behavior modification that ultimately serves the interests of cloud capital owners. This dynamic creates two new classes of workers: "cloud proles" and "cloud serfs." Cloud proles are traditional workers now subjected to algorithmic monitoring and control, like Amazon warehouse employees whose every movement is tracked and dictated by computer systems. Cloud serfs, meanwhile, represent a truly revolutionary development: billions of people who freely contribute their labor to reproduce and enhance cloud capital without receiving wages. Every time we post content, upload videos, write reviews, or simply browse online, we voluntarily produce value that enriches the owners of cloud capital. Perhaps most significantly, cloud capital has transformed traditional marketplaces into what can best be described as "cloud fiefs." Platforms like Amazon.com are not markets in any meaningful sense. They function as privatized transaction spaces where neither buyers nor sellers have the options they would in genuine markets. Every interaction is intermediated by algorithms designed to maximize value extraction, with the platform owner collecting substantial "cloud rent" from participants who have no viable alternative for reaching customers. The revolutionary nature of cloud capital lies in its ability to reproduce itself outside any labor market. While traditional capital required waged labor to accumulate, cloud capital can grow and multiply through the unpaid labor of billions of cloud serfs, creating an extractive power that has no historical parallel. This unprecedented capacity for self-reproduction through unwaged labor represents a fundamental break with capitalism's core mechanisms.

Chapter 3: The Rise of Cloudalists and the Demise of Profit

The emergence of a new ruling class - the "cloudalists" - constitutes perhaps the most significant manifestation of our transition to technofeudalism. These individuals and corporations have accumulated unprecedented wealth and power not through traditional capitalist profit-seeking but through the extraction of cloud rent. Their rise was made possible by a remarkable historical convergence: the 2008 financial crisis and the subsequent flood of central bank money that funded the development of cloud capital. Following the 2008 crash, central banks responded by creating trillions in new money, ostensibly to restore economic stability. However, this intervention had the unintended consequence of decoupling the accumulation of capital from profit generation. As traditional businesses refused to invest this newly created money due to insufficient demand in the real economy, cloudalists like Jeff Bezos and Elon Musk seized the opportunity to build powerful cloud capital infrastructures without relying on traditional profit mechanisms. This created a stunning paradox: companies without profits thrived in financial markets. Goldman Sachs even created a "Non-Profitable Technology Index" that demonstrated how loss-making cloudalist companies saw their share values explode during the pandemic. Amazon could book sales worth €44 billion at its global headquarters while paying zero corporate tax because it posted no profits. The message became clear: in the new technofeudal order, profit had become optional for those who controlled cloud capital. The demise of profit as capitalism's driving force represents a historic transformation. Since Adam Smith, the profit motive had been considered essential to capitalism's dynamism and efficiency. Now, with central bank money replacing profit as the system's fuel, that central pillar of capitalism had been removed. Meanwhile, the financialization of everything accelerated, with private equity firms like BlackRock, Vanguard, and State Street becoming effective owners of American capitalism, managing assets worth trillions and extracting rent rather than generating profits. This shift from profit to rent as the primary mechanism of wealth extraction marks the transition to technofeudalism. Cloud capital's unprecedented capacity to command the behavior of billions of people while siphoning value from the entire economic system has created a new power dynamic that more closely resembles medieval feudalism than modern capitalism - despite its high-tech veneer.

Chapter 4: Rent's Revenge: How Cloud Rent Replaced Market Profit

The resurgence of rent as the dominant form of wealth extraction represents the definitive break between capitalism and technofeudalism. Under feudalism, rent was the primary economic driver, extracted by landlords from peasants who worked the land. Capitalism triumphed when profit overthrew rent, transforming productive work and property rights into commodities sold via labor and share markets. Now, in a historical reversal, rent has staged a remarkable comeback, supplanting profit as the system's motivating force. Rent differs fundamentally from profit in that it flows from privileged access to things in fixed supply rather than from entrepreneurial innovation. While profit is vulnerable to market competition, rent is not. Cloudalists have perfected the art of rent extraction through their control of digital infrastructure. Apple's transformation is emblematic: while it once made profits by selling desirable devices, its real breakthrough came when it created the Apple Store, establishing an ecosystem where third-party developers became "unwaged laborers" and "vassal capitalists," paying a 30% ground rent on all their revenues. This pattern has been replicated across the digital economy. Google followed with its Android system and Google Play store. Amazon created a global supply chain through its cloud fief, extracting cloud rent from vassal capitalists selling physical goods. Companies like Uber, Lyft, and DoorDash wired into their cloud fiefs a vast array of gig workers, collecting fixed cuts of their earnings. From factory owners in America's Midwest to poets selling anthologies, from London Uber drivers to Indonesian street vendors, all now depend on cloud fiefs for access to customers and must pay substantial rent for the privilege. The distinction between profit and rent is not merely semantic. Rent's dominance signals a profound shift in economic dynamics. Whereas profit tends to be reinvested in productive capacity, rent is typically hoarded or spent on luxury consumption, leading to deeper economic stagnation. Moreover, rent extraction requires no innovation, only maintenance of monopoly power. This explains why, despite breathless proclamations about technological advancement, actual productivity growth has stagnated in the technofeudal era. The triumph of rent over profit explains many contemporary phenomena: the failure of massive monetary stimulus to generate real economic growth, the widening gap between financial markets and productive economies, and the increasing precarity of workers worldwide. It represents nothing less than the reversal of capitalism's historical victory over feudalism - a return to a system where wealth accumulation depends not on competitive innovation but on monopolistic extraction.

Chapter 5: Technofeudalism's Global Impact and the New Cold War

Technofeudalism has reshaped global geopolitics, most dramatically by triggering a New Cold War between the United States and China. This conflict emerges not from traditional ideological differences but from the clash between two competing systems of cloud-rent extraction, each seeking to establish global dominance. The ban on Huawei using Google's Android system and Biden's export restrictions on semiconductor technology represent attempts to prevent Chinese cloud capital from challenging American hegemony. The previous global economic arrangement - what could be called the "Dark Deal" between America and China - functioned through the dollar system. China produced goods sold in American markets, generating dollar profits that Chinese capitalists then invested in American financial assets. This arrangement collapsed when cloud capital achieved critical mass, enabling Chinese cloudalists to extract value directly without depending on America's trade deficit or the dollar's supremacy. The war in Ukraine accelerated this breakdown when Western sanctions against Russia demonstrated that dollar assets could be frozen, prompting many countries to seek alternatives. This technofeudal bifurcation has rendered Europe geostrategically irrelevant. Lacking significant cloud capital of its own and wholly dependent on American cloud infrastructure, Europe faces permanent subservience in the new order. Meanwhile, the Global South confronts an appalling choice: default on dollar debts and lose access to essential imports, or accept ruinous conditions from international financial institutions that deepen underdevelopment. Either way, developing nations are being forced to choose between American and Chinese cloud fiefs, further entrenching the global division. Climate change mitigation has become another casualty of technofeudalism. Any effective response requires international cooperation, but the New Cold War makes this virtually impossible. The privatization of energy systems has entangled them in financialized webs increasingly fused with cloud finance, diminishing democratic control over energy practices. As cloudalist power grows, our collective capacity to address climate catastrophe diminishes proportionally. Perhaps most disturbing is technofeudalism's impact on democracy itself. The concentration of unprecedented power in the hands of cloudalists has hollowed out democratic institutions. Citizens increasingly find themselves functioning as cloud serfs, their behavior modified and preferences shaped by algorithms designed to maximize cloud rent extraction. Traditional mechanisms of democratic accountability prove ineffective against this diffuse yet omnipresent power. Ironically, the only political force currently restraining cloudalist power is the Chinese Communist Party, which has placed strict limits on Chinese cloudalists to maintain party control.

Chapter 6: The Path to Liberation: Democratizing Cloud Capital

Liberation from technofeudalism requires collective action to reclaim cloud capital and democratize its power. A future beyond both capitalism and technofeudalism depends on transforming the ownership and governance of the digital infrastructure that increasingly controls our lives. This means neither rejecting technology nor accepting its current ownership structure, but rather establishing democratic control over cloud capital to serve human flourishing rather than rent extraction. One path forward involves democratizing companies through a one-employee-one-share system. Every worker would receive a single non-transferable share granting them an equal vote in company decisions, from strategy to pay distribution. This would eliminate the distinction between wages and profits, abolish the share market, and likely prevent companies from growing too large for effective collective governance. Such democratized firms would function within genuinely competitive markets free from the distortions of concentrated power, combining the innovation benefits of markets with democratic workplace governance. The monetary system could similarly be democratized through central bank digital wallets provided to every citizen. These accounts would receive a universal basic income and pay interest, encouraging people to move their savings from private banks to this new public digital payments system. This would transform central banks from servants of private finance into a form of monetary commons, supervised by randomly selected citizens and experts from diverse backgrounds. International trade could be regulated through a new digital accounting unit that prevents persistent trade imbalances and destructive speculation. For cloud capital specifically, a Social Accountability Act could require corporations to be graded by randomly selected citizens according to social worthiness, with consistently low-rated companies subject to deregistration. A Bill of Digital Rights would guarantee people ownership of their data, allowing them to choose what to sell and to whom. Micropayment platforms would replace the current attention-grabbing model, ensuring that developers pay for data and users pay small amounts for services, eliminating the extraction of unwaged labor from cloud serfs. The most promising strategy for challenging technofeudalism involves what might be called "cloud mobilization." Unlike traditional labor organizing, which required maximum personal sacrifice for minimal collective gain, cloud mobilization reverses this calculus: minimal personal sacrifice can deliver large collective gains. Global campaigns targeting specific cloudalist companies - through coordinated consumer boycotts and worker actions - could significantly impact share prices and power relations. Such cloud rebellions could unite cloud serfs, cloud proles, and even vassal capitalists in common cause against the cloudalist class.

Summary

The transformation from capitalism to technofeudalism represents one of history's great economic mutations, yet it has occurred largely beneath our conscious awareness. By identifying cloud capital as a fundamentally new form of extractive power and recognizing how it has replaced profit with rent as the system's driving force, we gain a framework that makes sense of our disorienting present. This perspective illuminates everything from the failure of monetary stimulus to generate real growth to the new geopolitical confrontation between the United States and China. The central insight is both profound and disturbing: we have not merely witnessed capitalism's intensification but its replacement by a system that combines feudal power relations with advanced technological infrastructure. Liberation requires more than traditional left-wing organizing strategies or right-wing market fundamentalism - it demands the democratization of cloud capital itself. By reclaiming collective ownership and control of the digital infrastructure that increasingly shapes our behavior and extracts our value, we might forge a path beyond both capitalism and technofeudalism toward a society where technology serves human flourishing rather than subjugation.

About Author

Loading...

Yanis Varoufakis

Ioannis "Yanis" Varoufakis is a Greek-Australian economist and politician. A former academic, he has been Secretary-General of MeRA25, a left-wing political party, since he founded it in 2018. A former member of Syriza, he served as Minister of Finance from January to July 2015 under Prime Minister Alexis Tsipras.

Read more

Related Books by Yanis Varoufakis

Loading...

Talking to My Daughter About the Economy

Yanis Varoufakis

A Brief History of Capitalism

★★★★☆4.1

Loading...

Adults in The Room

Yanis Varoufakis

My Battle With Europe’s Deep Establishment

★★★★☆4.3