The Ascent of Money

The Ascent of Money Plot Summary

Introduction

Money is perhaps humanity's most transformative invention - more revolutionary than the wheel, more influential than gunpowder. For thousands of years, financial innovation has shaped the rise and fall of civilizations in ways that often escape our notice. From the clay tablets of ancient Mesopotamia to the digital transactions of today, the evolution of finance has been a story of human ingenuity, ambition, and occasionally catastrophic failure. Through this historical journey, we'll discover how banking emerged from medieval Italian counting houses, how government bonds financed wars that shaped the modern world, and how stock markets created unprecedented wealth alongside devastating bubbles. We'll explore how insurance transformed our relationship with risk, how global financial networks connected distant economies, and why financial systems periodically collapse despite our best efforts to prevent crises. Whether you're a student of history, an investor seeking perspective, or simply curious about how financial forces have shaped our world, this exploration reveals the hidden architecture of money that continues to influence our lives today.

Chapter 1: Clay Tablets to Banking Houses: The Birth of Financial Institutions (3000 BCE-1500)

The story of banking begins not with gold coins but with humble clay tablets in ancient Mesopotamia around 3000 BCE. These tablets recorded debts, credits, and contracts between merchants and farmers, serving as the world's first financial instruments. In the temples of Babylon and Ur, priests acted as the original bankers, accepting deposits of grain and precious metals, keeping them safe in their fortified structures, and even making loans to merchants. The Code of Hammurabi, dating to approximately 1800 BCE, already contained sophisticated regulations for lending at interest, showing that financial concepts we consider modern were well established nearly four millennia ago. The Greeks and Romans further developed these banking practices. In Athens, trapezitai (money changers) set up tables in the marketplace to exchange currencies for merchants, while in Rome, argentarii operated from the Forum, accepting deposits, making loans, and changing money. These early bankers maintained detailed account books and developed primitive forms of credit transfer that allowed merchants to conduct business without physically moving coins. However, the fall of the Roman Empire disrupted this financial evolution, and banking retreated during the early medieval period as Europe's economy became more localized and self-sufficient. The revival of banking came from medieval Italy, where the commercial revolution of the 12th and 13th centuries created new demands for financial services. The word "bank" itself derives from the Italian "banco," the bench where money changers conducted their business. In cities like Florence, Venice, and Genoa, merchant families developed sophisticated banking operations that financed trade throughout the Mediterranean and beyond. The Medici family, beginning as modest money changers in the late 14th century, built Europe's most powerful financial dynasty, with branches across major European cities. Their innovation lay in diversification and organizational structure – they operated as a collection of partnerships rather than a single entity, allowing them to spread risk while maintaining family control. Religious prohibitions against usury (lending at interest) complicated financial development, but creative workarounds emerged. Jewish lenders operated in the gaps created by Christian restrictions, while Italian bankers developed techniques like the bill of exchange that effectively charged interest through exchange rate manipulations rather than explicit fees. The Knights Templar, a military religious order, became Europe's first multinational banking organization, using their network of fortified preceptories to move money safely across borders for pilgrims and crusaders. Their downfall in 1307, orchestrated by the indebted King Philip IV of France, demonstrated the dangerous relationship between finance and political power that would recur throughout history. By the 15th century, banking innovations had spread northward from Italy. The development of double-entry bookkeeping, pioneered by Luca Pacioli in 1494, revolutionized financial record-keeping and accountability. Banking families established correspondent relationships across Europe, creating networks that could transfer funds between distant cities without physically moving coins. The Fugger family of Augsburg financed the Habsburg emperors, while the Medici bank reached its zenith under Cosimo de' Medici, who effectively ruled Florence through financial rather than military power. These developments laid the groundwork for the next great financial innovation: the creation of government bonds and public debt markets that would fund the rise of nation-states. The legacy of these early financial institutions extends far beyond their time. They established fundamental banking concepts we still use today: deposit-taking, credit creation, international transfers, and financial record-keeping. More profoundly, they began the process of separating money from physical commodities, creating abstract financial instruments that could multiply economic activity beyond the constraints of precious metals. This conceptual revolution made possible the economic expansion that would follow in subsequent centuries, demonstrating how financial innovation can precede and enable broader economic development.

Chapter 2: Bonds and National Power: How Government Debt Shaped History (1500-1800)

The modern concept of government debt emerged in Renaissance Italy, where city-states like Venice and Florence developed innovative systems for financing their constant warfare. By the early 16th century, Venice had created the prestiti, a form of forced loan from wealthy citizens that paid regular interest and could be traded in a secondary market. This represented a crucial innovation: government debt that functioned as a financial asset, capable of being bought and sold. The Venetian system worked because the same wealthy families who controlled the government were also its major creditors, giving them every incentive to ensure interest was paid reliably. The Dutch Republic took this innovation to new heights in the 17th century. Facing the enormous costs of its long struggle for independence from Spain, the Dutch created a revolutionary financial system. The Bank of Amsterdam, founded in 1609, established a stable currency that became the envy of Europe. Meanwhile, Dutch public debt, backed by reliable tax revenues and traded on open markets, became the first true sovereign bond market. Interest rates on Dutch bonds fell to as low as 4 percent – remarkably low for the era – reflecting investors' confidence in the republic's finances. This financial revolution helped transform a small, resource-poor nation into the world's leading commercial power, demonstrating how financial innovation could translate into geopolitical strength. England's financial transformation came after the Glorious Revolution of 1688, which established parliamentary control over government finances. The Bank of England, founded in 1694, was created specifically to manage the growing national debt needed to finance wars against France. This debt, which grew from £12 million in 1700 to £850 million by 1815, would have bankrupted most nations. Yet Britain's robust tax system, parliamentary oversight, and the Bank's sound management ensured that this enormous debt remained serviceable. The creation of "consols" – perpetual bonds that never had to be repaid – in 1749 represented the pinnacle of this system. These became the most successful government securities in history, remaining in circulation for over 250 years. The power of the bond market reached new heights through the financial genius of Nathan Rothschild during the Napoleonic Wars. While many investors panicked as Napoleon's armies marched across Europe, Rothschild bought British government bonds aggressively. When he finally sold in 1817, with bond prices up more than 40 percent, his profits were enormous – one of history's most audacious and successful financial gambles. The Rothschild family went on to dominate international finance for decades, issuing sovereign bonds for countries across Europe and establishing a global financial network that gave them unprecedented influence. As one contemporary observed, "There is but one power in Europe, and that is Rothschild." The contrasting experiences of Britain and France with national debt had profound political consequences. In Britain, the "financial revolution" strengthened parliamentary government, as bondholders had a vested interest in political stability and oversight of royal finances. In France, financial dysfunction contributed directly to the Revolution of 1789, as the government's inability to manage its debt forced the calling of the Estates-General, setting in motion events that would topple the monarchy. The American Revolution likewise had financial roots, as Britain's attempts to tax its colonies to pay for the Seven Years' War met with resistance that ultimately led to independence. By 1800, it was clear that national debt, properly managed, was not merely a burden but a source of national strength. Britain's ability to borrow vast sums at low interest rates gave it a decisive advantage in the Napoleonic Wars. As economic historian Niall Ferguson observed, "the battle of Waterloo was won not on the playing fields of Eton but in the counting houses of the City of London." The bond market had become an instrument of state power, allowing governments to mobilize resources on an unprecedented scale and laying the groundwork for the industrial revolution that would follow. This period established a truth that remains relevant today: a nation's financial credibility can be as important to its security as its military might.

Chapter 3: Stock Market Evolution: From Trading Companies to Speculative Bubbles (1600-1929)

The joint-stock company, which allows thousands of individuals to pool resources for risky, long-term projects, emerged as one of capitalism's most transformative innovations in the early 17th century. The Dutch East India Company (VOC), established in 1602, pioneered this form of business organization. Unlike earlier trading ventures that were liquidated after each voyage, the VOC raised permanent capital from over 1,100 investors. Ownership was divided into transferable shares, creating the need for a secondary market where these could be traded. This innovation allowed the company to undertake the massive investments needed to establish trading posts and military operations across Asia, creating what was effectively a corporate empire. The Amsterdam stock exchange quickly became sophisticated. By 1607, one-third of VOC shares had changed hands, and a forward market developed for future delivery of shares. Bulls battled bears amid what one contemporary described as "shouting, insults, impudence, pushing and shoving." The VOC's success was remarkable – between 1602 and 1733, its stock rose from par (100) to a peak of 786, while paying substantial dividends. This demonstrated the potential of equity markets to generate wealth, but also their tendency toward speculation. Joseph de la Vega's 1688 book "Confusion of Confusions," the first account of stock market behavior, already described many psychological patterns that remain familiar to modern investors. The Mississippi Bubble of 1719-20 revealed how quickly stock markets could transform from engines of wealth creation to instruments of financial destruction. John Law, a Scottish mathematician and gambler, convinced France's Regent to let him establish a national bank that issued paper money and a trading company with monopoly rights to France's Louisiana territory. Law's "System" initially revitalized the French economy by expanding the money supply and converting government debt into company shares. The Mississippi Company's stock soared from 500 livres to over 10,000 livres within months, creating a speculative frenzy that drew in participants from all social classes. However, Law had created a classic bubble. The company's actual operations in Louisiana – where settlement was minimal and the fabled gold mines nonexistent – couldn't possibly justify such valuations. When investors began converting shares back to gold and silver, Law desperately tried to prop up share prices and banned the use of precious metals. The bubble burst spectacularly in 1720, with share prices collapsing and Law fleeing France. The catastrophe set back French financial development for generations and left the monarchy's fiscal problems unresolved, contributing to conditions that eventually led to revolution. A similar bubble in England – the South Sea Bubble – burst the same year, though with less devastating consequences for the broader economy. The 19th century saw stock markets become increasingly central to economic development, particularly in financing railroads – the era's most capital-intensive industry. In Britain, the railway mania of the 1840s saw hundreds of companies formed and massive speculation in their shares, followed by a painful crash. In the United States, railroad stocks dominated markets after the Civil War, with figures like Jay Gould and Jim Fisk manipulating prices through corners and pools. The era also saw the emergence of stock exchanges as formal institutions with membership requirements and trading rules, gradually replacing the informal coffee-house trading of earlier periods. The Wall Street Crash of 1929 and subsequent Great Depression demonstrated how stock market failures could devastate the broader economy. From September 1929 to July 1932, the US stock market declined by 89 percent, while output fell by a third and unemployment reached 25 percent. The crash revealed fundamental flaws in the financial system: excessive leverage as investors bought stocks "on margin" with borrowed money; manipulation by pools and insiders; and the absence of transparency in corporate reporting. These failures led to landmark reforms, including the creation of the Securities and Exchange Commission, mandatory disclosure requirements for public companies, and the separation of commercial and investment banking under the Glass-Steagall Act. These regulations created a framework for more stable markets that would last for decades, demonstrating how financial crises often drive institutional evolution and reform.

Chapter 4: Insurance and Risk: Mathematical Solutions to Life's Uncertainties (1700-1950)

The fundamental human impulse to protect against future calamity gave birth to insurance, but modern insurance required a theoretical foundation that emerged through remarkable intellectual breakthroughs between 1660 and 1764. Blaise Pascal established that "fear of harm ought to be proportional not merely to the gravity of the harm, but also to the probability of the event." Edmund Halley created the first life table showing mortality probabilities at different ages. Jacob Bernoulli's Law of Large Numbers demonstrated that patterns observed in the past would repeat in the future with mathematical predictability. These theoretical advances transformed insurance from gambling into science, allowing risks to be quantified, priced, and transferred. The Scottish Ministers' Widows' Fund, established in 1744, represents a milestone in financial history. Created by two Church of Scotland ministers, Robert Wallace and Alexander Webster, with the mathematical assistance of Colin Maclaurin, this fund collected annual contributions from clergymen to provide for their widows and children after death. Unlike earlier arrangements that operated on a pay-as-you-go basis, this fund accumulated capital that was invested to generate returns. The fund's success rested on actuarial calculations that determined appropriate contribution levels based on ministers' ages and life expectancies. Their projections proved remarkably accurate; by 1765, the fund's capital stood at £58,347, just one pound off their original estimate of £58,348. Insurance spread rapidly during the Industrial Revolution as entrepreneurs sought protection against new risks. The Great Fire of London in 1666 had already spurred the creation of fire insurance companies, with Nicholas Barbon's Fire Office established in 1680. Marine insurance evolved from the coffee houses of London, particularly Lloyd's, where shipowners and merchants gathered to spread the risk of oceanic voyages. Life insurance became increasingly sophisticated, with companies like the Scottish Widows' Fund (1815) and Standard Life Assurance Company (1825) applying actuarial principles to build substantial reserves. By the late 19th century, insurance had become a cornerstone of Victorian financial prudence, with policies covering everything from fire and shipwrecks to premature death and industrial accidents. The mathematics of insurance continued to advance through figures like Adolphe Quetelet, who discovered that accidental deaths followed predictable patterns, and Francis Galton, who developed the concept of regression to the mean. These statistical insights allowed insurers to price risks more accurately and maintain appropriate reserves. Insurance companies became major institutional investors, using their premium income to purchase bonds, mortgages, and eventually equities. By 1900, British insurance companies held assets equivalent to half the national debt, making them powerful players in financial markets and creating a virtuous cycle where insurance facilitated economic growth while benefiting from it. The 20th century saw insurance expand into new domains while facing unprecedented challenges. Social insurance emerged as governments recognized that private insurance couldn't adequately protect all citizens. Germany pioneered compulsory health insurance in 1883 under Bismarck, with other European nations following suit. After the Great Depression, the United States established Social Security, unemployment insurance, and later Medicare and Medicaid. These programs created a hybrid system where risks were shared between private insurers, individuals, and the state. Meanwhile, new forms of private insurance emerged to cover automobiles, airplanes, and eventually cyber risks and climate change. The limits of insurance became apparent when risks grew too large or unpredictable for private markets to handle. The terrorist attacks of September 11, 2001, cost insurers approximately $40 billion, leading many to exclude terrorism coverage from future policies until government backstops were established. Hurricane Katrina in 2005 exposed critical flaws in America's disaster protection system, with private insurers often refusing to pay claims by arguing that damage resulted from flooding (covered by federal insurance) rather than wind. These events highlighted a fundamental challenge: when catastrophic risks materialize, private insurance often retreats, leaving governments as insurers of last resort. This pattern continues today with emerging threats from climate change, pandemics, and other systemic risks that test the boundaries of insurability.

Chapter 5: Global Finance: Imperial Networks to East-West Integration (1870-2008)

The late 19th century witnessed the first great era of financial globalization, built upon the foundation of the international gold standard. This system, which pegged major currencies to gold at fixed rates, created unprecedented monetary stability and facilitated cross-border investment. By 1913, Britain had foreign assets worth 150 percent of its GDP, with capital flowing freely to developing regions in Latin America, Eastern Europe, and Asia. London stood at the center of this global financial web, with the pound sterling serving as the world's primary reserve currency. The financial pages of The Times listed bonds from Argentina to Zanzibar, allowing even middle-class British investors to build globally diversified portfolios. This golden age of globalization collapsed amid the catastrophe of World War I. Countries abandoned the gold standard to finance war expenditures through inflation, and international capital flows virtually ceased. The attempt to restore the pre-war financial order in the 1920s ended in failure, as countries rejoined the gold standard at unsustainable rates and imposed new barriers to trade and capital. The Great Depression delivered the final blow, triggering competitive devaluations, protectionist policies, and the fragmentation of the global economy into currency blocs. By the 1930s, the integrated global financial system had disintegrated into a series of closed national economies. A new international financial architecture emerged from the ashes of World War II. At Bretton Woods in 1944, delegates from 44 nations established a system of fixed but adjustable exchange rates, with the dollar pegged to gold at $35 per ounce and other currencies pegged to the dollar. The International Monetary Fund would provide short-term assistance to countries facing balance of payments difficulties, while the World Bank would finance reconstruction and development. This system provided monetary stability for nearly three decades, underpinning the post-war economic miracle in Europe, Japan, and North America. However, it also imposed significant constraints on capital mobility, allowing countries to maintain independent monetary policies aimed at full employment. The Bretton Woods system collapsed in the early 1970s due to growing imbalances in the global economy. As economist Robert Triffin had predicted, the use of the dollar as both a national currency and the world's reserve currency created an inherent contradiction. The global economy required an expanding supply of dollars, which the United States could only provide by running balance of payments deficits. These deficits eventually undermined confidence in the dollar's gold convertibility. In August 1971, President Nixon suspended dollar-gold convertibility, effectively ending the Bretton Woods era and ushering in a system of floating exchange rates. The post-Bretton Woods era saw a dramatic resurgence of global finance. Capital controls were dismantled across the developed world in the 1980s and 1990s, allowing money to flow more freely across borders. Financial deregulation removed barriers between previously separate financial activities, while technological innovation dramatically reduced transaction costs. The collapse of communism opened vast new territories to global finance, and emerging markets from Latin America to East Asia attracted enormous capital inflows. This renewed globalization brought both opportunities and vulnerabilities, as financial crises became more frequent and contagious—from the Latin American debt crisis of the 1980s to the Asian financial crisis of 1997-98. By the early 21st century, a new global financial relationship had emerged between China and the United States—a symbiosis that historian Niall Ferguson dubbed "Chimerica." China exported manufactured goods to the United States and recycled its trade surpluses into American government bonds, helping to finance America's growing budget and current account deficits. This arrangement kept US interest rates low, fueling a credit boom that culminated in the housing bubble of the 2000s. When this bubble burst in 2007-2008, it triggered a global financial crisis that revealed the fragility of the highly interconnected global financial system. The crisis demonstrated that while financial globalization efficiently distributed capital in good times, it could also transmit contagion with devastating speed during periods of stress—a fundamental tension that continues to challenge policymakers today.

Chapter 6: Financial Crises: Recurring Patterns of Boom and Collapse (1929-2008)

Financial history reveals a striking pattern of recurring crises, each seemingly unique yet sharing fundamental similarities. The economist Hyman Minsky captured this cyclical nature with his Financial Instability Hypothesis, which explains how periods of stability paradoxically breed instability. During prosperous times, borrowers and lenders become increasingly confident, taking on greater risks and accumulating more debt. Eventually, this optimism creates fragile financial structures that collapse when economic conditions change, triggering a crisis that only ends when balance sheets are restored through painful deleveraging. This pattern has repeated with remarkable consistency across different eras and financial systems. The Great Depression of the 1930s remains the archetypal financial crisis. What began as a stock market crash in October 1929 transformed into a banking crisis as depositors lost confidence in financial institutions. Between 1929 and 1933, approximately 10,000 American banks failed, wiping out the savings of millions. The Federal Reserve's failure to act as lender of last resort allowed a liquidity crisis to become a solvency crisis, while adherence to the gold standard prevented monetary expansion. The resulting deflation increased the real burden of debt, forcing households and businesses to cut spending to repair their balance sheets, which further depressed economic activity. The Depression demonstrated how financial crises could devastate the real economy, leading to unemployment rates of 25 percent and a decline in output of nearly one-third. The post-war period saw numerous financial crises in emerging markets, often following a similar script. Countries would attract foreign capital during boom times, often borrowing in foreign currencies. When investor sentiment changed, capital would flee, causing currency collapses that made foreign-denominated debts unsustainable. The Latin American debt crisis began in August 1982 when Mexico announced it could no longer service its foreign debt, triggering similar crises across the region. The Asian Financial Crisis of 1997-98 followed a similar pattern, as countries that had been celebrated as "economic miracles" suddenly faced capital flight, currency collapses, and deep recessions. These crises revealed how financial globalization created new vulnerabilities for developing economies. Advanced economies weren't immune to financial instability. The United States experienced the Savings and Loan Crisis in the 1980s, when hundreds of thrift institutions failed after interest rate deregulation and risky lending. Japan suffered a massive asset price bubble in the late 1980s, when stock and real estate values more than tripled before collapsing in 1990. The subsequent "lost decade" demonstrated how difficult recovery can be when financial crises coincide with demographic challenges and policy mistakes. These episodes showed that financial development and sophistication did not eliminate the risk of crises, and might even create new forms of systemic vulnerability. The global financial crisis of 2007-2008 combined elements from many previous crises. It began with a classic credit boom in American housing, fueled by low interest rates, financial innovation, and regulatory failures. Mortgage lenders originated loans to increasingly risky borrowers, then sold these loans to investment banks, which packaged them into complex securities rated as safe by credit rating agencies. When housing prices began falling in 2006, the entire structure unraveled. Bear Stearns collapsed in March 2008, followed by Lehman Brothers in September, triggering a global panic that froze credit markets worldwide. Only unprecedented interventions by central banks and governments prevented a second Great Depression. Each crisis teaches painful lessons that shape subsequent regulations and institutions, yet new vulnerabilities inevitably emerge. After the Great Depression, policymakers created deposit insurance and separated commercial from investment banking. Following the 2008 crisis, they increased capital requirements, established macroprudential regulation, and created new resolution mechanisms for failing institutions. However, as memories fade and financial innovation continues, the stage is set for future crises that will likely emerge from unexpected corners of an increasingly complex global financial system. This pattern suggests that financial instability is not an aberration but an inherent feature of modern economies—a challenge that requires constant vigilance and adaptation rather than permanent solutions.

Summary

Throughout the history of money, we see a fundamental tension between financial innovation and financial stability. Each new financial instrument or institution—from Renaissance banking to mortgage-backed securities—has expanded human possibilities while simultaneously creating new forms of risk. Banking allowed capital to flow from savers to entrepreneurs but introduced the possibility of bank runs. Government bonds financed nation-states but created the power of bondholders over public policy. Stock markets mobilized capital for industrial development but generated speculative bubbles. Insurance quantified and transferred risk but created moral hazard. Global financial networks facilitated international trade but transmitted contagion during crises. This historical perspective offers crucial insights for navigating our financial future. First, we must recognize that financial development is neither inherently good nor bad—its effects depend on the institutional frameworks that govern it. Second, financial literacy and historical awareness are essential safeguards against the recurring amnesia that leads societies to repeat past mistakes. Finally, the balance between financial innovation and regulation must be continuously recalibrated as circumstances change. Neither unfettered markets nor rigid controls can provide lasting financial stability. Instead, we need adaptive systems that harness the creative power of finance while constraining its destructive potential—a challenge that requires understanding the long arc of financial history rather than merely responding to the crisis of the moment.

About Author

Loading...

Niall Ferguson

Niall Ferguson is a senior fellow at the Hoover Institution at Stanford University, former Laurence A. Tisch Professor of History at Harvard University and current senior fellow at the Center for European Studies at Harvard University, a visiting professor at Tsinghua University, Beijing, and founder and managing director of advisory firm Greenmantle LLC. The author of 15 books, Ferguson is writing a life of Henry Kissinger, the first volume of which--Kissinger, 1923-1968: The Idealist--was published in 2015 to critical acclaim. The World's Banker: The History of the House of Rothschild won the Wadsworth Prize for Business History. Other titles include Civilization: The West and the Rest, The Great Degeneration: How Institutions Decay and Economies Die and High Financier: The Lives and Time of Siegmund Warburg. Ferguson's six-part PBS television series, "The Ascent of Money: A Financial History of the World," based on his best-seller, won an International Emmy for best documentary in 2009. Civilization was also made into a documentary series. Ferguson is a recipient of the Benjamin Franklin Award for Public Service as well as other honors. His most recent book is The Square and the Tower: Networks on Power from the Freemasons to Facebook (2018).(Source: Amazon)

Read more

Related Books by Niall Ferguson

Loading...

Empire

Niall Ferguson

How Britain Made the Modern World

★★★½☆3.9