Alchemy

Alchemy Plot Summary

Introduction

The modern world often turns its back on illogic, yet there are countless valuable solutions waiting to be discovered if we dare to abandon standard-issue, naïve logic in our search for answers. While reductionist logic has proven reliable in physical sciences, we now mistakenly believe it must be applicable everywhere—even in the much messier field of human affairs. The models that dominate all human decision-making today are consequently heavy on simplistic logic and light on magic; a spreadsheet leaves no room for miracles. But what if this approach is fundamentally wrong? Throughout these pages, we will explore how humans actually make decisions, which differs dramatically from conventional rationality. This alternative operating system—psycho-logic—has evolved to be useful rather than optimal. By understanding this parallel system, which often operates unconsciously and is far more powerful than we realize, we can unlock tremendous value in both personal and professional realms. The journey will take us through signaling, unconscious hacking, satisficing, and psychophysics—the four main reasons why human behavior often departs from what we consider conventional rationality—offering both explanation and practical application for each concept.

Chapter 1: The Limits of Logic: Why Rationality Fails in Human Affairs

When faced with complex problems, we often reach for rational, logical approaches, believing they will yield the best solutions. However, these methods frequently fail us in human affairs because they attempt to recreate the certainty of physical sciences in domains where such certainty is impossible. The human mind does not run on logic any more than a horse runs on petrol. While mathematics and engineering benefit from strict logical rules, human behavior and decision-making operate under fundamentally different principles. This mismatch leads to significant practical problems. Consider how economists approach human behavior: they model it as though it were a machine with predictable inputs and outputs. But humans are not machines; we are complex systems capable of surprising, creative, and seemingly irrational choices that often prove more effective than "rational" alternatives. When we try to apply narrow rationality to broad human challenges, we miss the most innovative solutions. For example, a strictly logical approach to airport transportation might focus exclusively on minimizing travel time. But real human travelers care about much more: reliability, comfort, the variance in journey time, and even the views from the route. GPS navigation systems, for all their technological brilliance, can recommend terrible routes because they optimize for a single variable while ignoring the wider context of human preferences and concerns. The reality is that logic is useful for evaluating solutions but often terrible at finding them in the first place. Most great breakthroughs in science, business, and human affairs came not through sequential reasoning but through intuition, experimentation, and luck. As physicist Richard Feynman explained about his scientific method: "First, we guess it... It doesn't make any difference how beautiful your guess is, how smart you are, who made the guess or what his name is... If it disagrees with experiment, it's wrong." Good guesses that stand up to observation are still science, as are lucky accidents. In human affairs, the best approaches typically involve "satisficing"—finding satisfactory solutions for a realistic world—rather than seeking optimal solutions for an oversimplified model. When we abandon our addiction to narrow rationality, we open ourselves to discovering the seemingly irrational yet remarkably effective solutions that conventional thinking would never consider. Logic should be a tool, not a rule.

Chapter 2: Psycho-Logic: Understanding Unconscious Motivations Behind Behavior

Psycho-logic operates beneath our conscious awareness, following rules that seem irrational when viewed through the lens of conventional reasoning but make perfect sense when we consider our evolutionary history. This alternative operating system emerged not from academic theories but from millennia of adaptation to survival challenges. Understanding it requires acknowledging a fundamental truth: there are often two reasons behind people's behavior—the ostensibly logical reason they'll tell you, and the real unconscious driver. Take toothbrushing. If asked why we clean our teeth, most would cite dental health and cavity prevention. Yet our actual behavior reveals a different story. We're more likely to brush before a date than after eating sweets, and 95% of toothpastes are mint-flavored—suggesting social confidence, not just health concerns, drives this behavior. This distinction matters tremendously because when we try to change behavior through rational argument alone, we often fail spectacularly. Understanding the unconscious obstacle to a new behavior and removing it, or creating a new context for a decision, generally works much more effectively. The argumentative hypothesis offers a compelling explanation for this disconnect: reason evolved in the human brain not to inform our actions and beliefs, but to explain and defend them to others. In this view, reason functions as the brain's PR department rather than its science division. This theory explains why we're skilled at finding justifications for positions we already hold but struggle to objectively evaluate new evidence. It explains confirmation bias and our tendency to change our perception of reality to depict ourselves in a better light. This divide between conscious justification and unconscious motivation appears everywhere once you know to look for it. Studies show that people are influenced by factors they'd never acknowledge: the weather affects judicial decisions, the weight of a clipboard influences hiring choices, and the temperature of a drink changes how we perceive others. These influences operate below our awareness, yet powerfully shape our choices and judgments. To be an effective problem-solver in human domains, we must learn to ask "the real why"—looking beyond rational explanations to uncover hidden motivations. This approach isn't cynical but practical; it acknowledges that humans are social creatures whose decisions are shaped by context, emotion, and unconscious drives far more than by rational calculation. By working with these forces rather than against them, we can design interventions that actually succeed in changing behavior, even when conventional approaches fail.

Chapter 3: Signalling: How Costly Actions Create Meaning and Trust

Costly signaling represents one of the most powerful concepts for understanding human behavior. This principle explains why we often engage in seemingly wasteful or inefficient activities that nonetheless serve crucial social functions. The theory, first proposed by evolutionary biologist Amotz Zahavi, shows that for signals to be reliable, they must be costly to fake—otherwise, deception would undermine the entire system of trust. Consider the London black cab driver who undergoes the grueling four-year initiation program known as "the Knowledge," memorizing 25,000 streets and 20,000 landmarks. While GPS technology has made this memorization seemingly obsolete, the Knowledge serves a crucial signaling function. It demonstrates extraordinary commitment and reliability—qualities essential in a profession where strangers must trust drivers with their safety. This commitment device exploits an important truth: once you've made a significant investment in time or resources, there's no way of reversing it, which creates powerful incentives for honest behavior. The same principle explains why businesses invest in expensive advertising campaigns, elaborate storefronts, or costly customer service operations. These expenditures signal to potential customers: "We're investing substantially in our reputation, which we would not do if we planned to disappoint you." When Nike chose Colin Kaepernick as the face of their 2018 campaign—a controversial figure associated with NFL protests—they demonstrated costly signaling through bravery. As research shows, meaning is conveyed by actions that defy narrow self-interest. Signaling explains phenomena across domains, from peacock tails to wedding invitations. The peacock's extravagant plumage evolved not despite its costliness but because of it—only the healthiest males can afford such a display. Similarly, we send wedding invitations on expensive cards not because email wouldn't communicate the same information, but because the costliness of the signal conveys meaning about the importance of the event. As philosopher Augustine supposedly said, "I believe it because it is ridiculous"—we attach meaning to things precisely because they deviate from practical efficiency. This insight has profound implications for communication, business, and policy. Messages that appear too logical or cost-free often lack credibility. Adding an element of costliness—whether through money, time, effort, talent, or even risk—creates the conditions for trust to flourish. Without these seemingly inefficient signals, cooperation between strangers would be impossible in many contexts. The efficiency, logic, and meaning triangle presents a critical trade-off: you can have any two, but rarely all three simultaneously.

Chapter 4: Perception vs Reality: The Power of Context in Decision-Making

The gap between objective reality and human perception forms one of the most profound insights in behavioral science. We don't respond to the world as it is, but to the world as we perceive it—and these perceptions can be dramatically influenced by context, framing, and presentation. This divergence isn't a flaw but a feature of our cognitive architecture, evolved to help us navigate a complex world with limited information-processing capacity. Consider a simple example from psychophysics: when Cadbury changed the shape of their chocolate blocks from angular to rounded corners, customers complained the recipe had changed, though the formulation remained identical. Why? Because smoother shapes taste sweeter to the human brain. Similarly, words on packaging directly affect taste perception—adding "low fat" to food labels makes contents taste worse regardless of actual composition. As Alfred Korzybski demonstrated when he offered students "dog cookies" that were actually regular biscuits, people don't just eat food but also words, and the taste of the former is often outdone by the taste of the latter. Context shapes not only sensory perception but also value judgments. Studies show that the same wine tastes better when poured from a heavier bottle, and painkillers are more effective when people believe they are expensive. The focusing illusion, as Daniel Kahneman explains, causes us to vastly overestimate the significance of anything to which our attention is drawn. When buying a car, we might focus on leather seats while ignoring attributes that will actually matter more during ownership, like reliability or running costs. These perceptual mechanisms aren't random but follow systematic patterns that can be understood and leveraged. One powerful principle is "benign bullshit"—apparently irrational elements that nonetheless serve important psychological functions. For instance, adding geographical adjectives to menu items increases their appeal by 27%, though it changes nothing about the food itself. Similarly, medicine tastes horrid not by accident but by design—the unpleasantness signals potency and effectiveness. Understanding these patterns allows us to design better systems and experiences. The Boeing 787 Dreamliner incorporates extensive psychophysics research, using lighting, pressurization, humidity, and visual illusions to improve the passenger experience. While engineers and accountants might focus exclusively on objective metrics, human affairs require attention to subjective perception. As one expert notes, "What determines the behavior of physical objects is the thing itself, but what determines the behavior of living creatures is their perception of the thing itself."

Chapter 5: Satisficing: When 'Good Enough' Beats Optimization

Herbert Simon coined the term "satisficing" in the 1950s to describe how humans make decisions under circumstances where optimal solutions cannot be determined. It combines "satisfy" and "suffice," contrasting with "maximizing," which seeks the single best answer. Satisficing acknowledges that in complex, real-world situations with limited information, we often do better by finding acceptable solutions rather than pursuing illusory perfection. This approach proves particularly valuable when dealing with "wide context" problems—those involving ambiguity, multiple variables, and no single right answer. Consider a simple example: deciding how to get to an airport. While mathematics can calculate the shortest route, the real decision involves countless variables: the weather, your luggage amount, trip duration, parking costs, the variance in journey time between different routes, and the consequences of missing your flight. Humans intuitively excel at these problems, whereas strict optimization often produces dangerously incomplete answers. One key insight from satisficing is the importance of reducing downside risk rather than maximizing upside potential. A darts player repeatedly aiming for the southwest quadrant of the board rather than the triple 20 might look irrational to observers, but this approach minimizes the risk of scoring only 3 points while still achieving respectable scores. Similarly, returning annually to the same vacation resort may seem unimaginative but effectively prevents bad holidays. This explains many consumer behaviors: the reluctance to change banks despite better interest rates elsewhere stems from the fear that a 1% chance of a nightmarish experience outweighs a 99% chance of a 5% gain. This principle extends to social copying and brand loyalty. When faced with uncertainty, following others or choosing recognized brands represents not irrationality but intelligent risk management. As Joel Raphaelson astutely observed, "People do not choose Brand A over Brand B because they think Brand A is better, but because they are more certain that it is good." We pay premium prices for recognized brands not because we're irrational, but because reputational capital serves as insurance against disappointment. The implications reach far beyond consumer behavior. In crisis situations, following heuristic rules often outperforms complex calculations. When Captain Chesley Sullenberger landed on the Hudson River after losing both engines, he didn't calculate the aircraft's glide path using complex formulas; he used a simple rule of thumb learned as a glider pilot. Such mental shortcuts aren't second-best options—in a world of incomplete information and limited processing capacity, they're often the most reliable approach available.

Chapter 6: Self-Placebbing: How We Hack Our Own Unconscious

Humans routinely deploy strategies to influence aspects of ourselves we cannot control directly through conscious will. This phenomenon, which psychologist Jonathan Haidt calls "self-placebbing," explains many seemingly irrational behaviors that actually serve crucial psychological functions. Understanding this concept reveals that what may look like nonsensical activity often represents sophisticated attempts to hack our own unconscious processes. The placebo effect provides the most vivid illustration of this principle. Despite lacking direct medical efficacy, placebos can produce remarkable healing effects by convincing our bodies that conditions are favorable for recovery. Nicholas Humphrey's evolutionary theory suggests that our immune system evolved to be calibrated for harsher environments than today's world. Placebos—whether sugar pills, exotic potions, or doctor visits—signal to our unconscious that it's safe to invest resources in healing rather than conserving them for survival emergencies. This same mechanism explains many consumer behaviors. The trillion-dollar beauty industry exists largely as a self-administered confidence placebo—a way to produce emotions we cannot generate through conscious will alone. Similarly, the peculiar success of Red Bull stems from psycho-logical rather than physical properties. Its small can, premium price, and distinctive taste create a powerful mental framework that changes how we perceive its effects. Studies show that merely labeling a cocktail as containing Red Bull leads people to take more risks and feel more intoxicated, even when the actual beverage is identical to what others consume. What's particularly fascinating is that these psychological hacks often require an element of illogicality or inefficiency to work. Military regalia, uniforms, and drill serve as "bravery placebos"—environmental cues designed to foster courage and solidarity that couldn't be summoned through conscious decision alone. Expensive, foul-tasting medicine works better than pleasant, cheap alternatives precisely because these seemingly negative attributes signal potency to our unconscious. The very costliness or unpleasantness becomes a crucial part of the effectiveness. This insight has profound implications for product design, healthcare, and personal development. Rather than dismissing behaviors that seem irrational from a narrowly logical perspective, we should consider what unconscious ends they might serve. The elevator "door close" button, often connected to nothing at all, provides passengers with a valuable sense of control. Night Nurse cold medicine succeeded precisely because its side effect of drowsiness was reframed as a feature. By recognizing and working with our unconscious processes rather than ignoring them, we can design interventions that align with how humans actually function rather than how we think they should.

Chapter 7: From Theory to Practice: The Principles of Modern Alchemy

Modern alchemy represents a practical approach to human behavior that embraces rather than fights against our psychological quirks. Unlike conventional problem-solving that assumes perfect rationality, alchemy acknowledges that humans often seek optimistic interpretations, respond to context more than content, and make decisions based on emotion rather than calculation. By working with these tendencies rather than against them, we can achieve remarkable results with minimal resources. The first principle of modern alchemy involves understanding that, given enough material to work with, people naturally try to be optimistic. When an airline pilot announces, "I've got some bad news and some good news—the bad news is we'll need to take a bus from the plane, the good news is it will drive you directly to passport control," passengers reframe what would otherwise be an annoyance as a benefit. This psychological tendency to direct attention to the upside of situations when an alternative narrative is available can transform experiences without changing objective reality. Another powerful alchemical principle is finding different expressions for the same thing. The Wason selection task—a logical puzzle that stumps most Princeton students when presented abstractly—becomes simple when reframed as checking whether underage people are drinking alcohol, though the logical structure remains identical. Similarly, reframing monthly costs as daily amounts ("50p per day" rather than "£17 per month") can dramatically change perceptions of value. Creating meaningful choices, even when seemingly unnecessary, represents another alchemical technique. Studies show that offering customers multiple response methods (phone and mail) increases overall response rates compared to offering either method alone. This explains why public services and monopolies, even when objectively efficient, often feel unsatisfying—they lack the emotional component of having been chosen. Perhaps most counterintuitively, alchemy often involves daring to be trivial. A simple change to a checkout button on a retail website from "Register" to "Continue" with reassuring text increased purchases by 45%, generating $300 million in additional revenue in its first year. The change didn't reduce the information collected—90% of customers still registered after completing their purchase—it simply changed the order of operations to align with human psychology rather than logical efficiency. The ultimate lesson of modern alchemy is that solving human problems requires abandoning our addiction to narrow, conventional logic. As Bill Bernbach observed, logic always gets you to exactly the same place as your competitors. By understanding and working with human psychology rather than against it, we can discover solutions that would remain invisible to purely rational analysis. The alchemist's approach doesn't reject reason entirely, but supplements it with a deeper appreciation for how humans actually think, feel, and decide in the real world.

Summary

The central insight that emerges across this exploration is that human decisions are governed by psycho-logic rather than conventional logic—an operating system that evolved not for optimal decision-making but for survival and social cohesion. This perspective challenges our culture's overreliance on narrow rationality, revealing how seemingly irrational behaviors often represent sophisticated adaptations to complex environments. The magic of alchemy lies in understanding that perception, context, and meaning can be more powerful than objective reality in shaping human experience. The practical power of this approach cannot be overstated. By recognizing that decisions are driven by unconscious processes, costly signaling, perceptual biases, and satisficing strategies, we gain access to a vast toolkit of interventions that conventional logic would never consider. Whether designing products, crafting policies, or simply navigating everyday interactions, the principles of psycho-logic offer a more complete framework for understanding and influencing human behavior. The ultimate lesson is not that we should abandon reason entirely, but that we should expand our conception of rationality to include the full complexity of the human mind—both its conscious deliberations and its unconscious brilliance.

About Author

Loading...

Rory Sutherland

Rory Sutherland is the vice-chairman of Ogilvy UK and the co-founder of its Behavioural Science Practice. He is the author of Alchemy: The Surprising Power of Ideas that Don’t Make Sense, writes The Spectator’s Wiki Man column, presents several series for Radio 4, serves on the advisory board of the Evolution Institute and is former president of the Institute of Practitioners in Advertising. His TED talks have been viewed more than 7 million times.

Read more