Alone Together

Alone Together Plot Summary

Introduction

Look around any restaurant, park, or family gathering today. What do you see? People physically together yet mentally elsewhere, their attention captured by glowing screens. A teenager texts while her parents talk beside her. A couple sits in silence, each scrolling through separate digital worlds. A father pushes his child on a swing with one hand while checking email with the other. These scenes have become so common we hardly notice them anymore, yet they represent a profound shift in how we connect with each other. We live in an era of paradoxical isolation - more connected than ever through technology, yet increasingly experiencing a sense of loneliness and disconnection. Our devices promise to bring us together across vast distances, but they often separate us from those sitting right beside us. We've created remarkable technologies that respond to our social and emotional needs, from sociable robots that ask for our care to social networks that keep us constantly updated on our friends' lives. Yet something essential seems to be slipping away. This book explores how technology is reshaping our relationships, our expectations of each other, and even our understanding of what it means to be human in an increasingly digital world.

Chapter 1: The Rise of Sociable Robots

Imagine a small, furry creature that responds to your touch, makes eye contact, and seems to need your care. It's not a pet, but a robot designed to create an emotional connection with you. These sociable robots represent a significant shift in our relationship with technology - from seeing machines as tools to seeing them as potential companions. Unlike industrial robots designed for efficiency, sociable robots are specifically engineered to engage us on an emotional level. What makes these robots so compelling is their ability to push our Darwinian buttons. We humans are biologically programmed to respond to certain social cues - eye contact, facial expressions, and gestures that signal attention. When a robot makes eye contact, tracks our movements, or responds to our voice with appropriate expressions, we instinctively react as if we were in the presence of something alive. Even when we intellectually understand that the robot has no feelings, we can't help responding emotionally. This vulnerability to connection is hardwired into our psychology. Children demonstrate this tendency most clearly. In studies at MIT, researchers observed how children interacted with robots like Kismet and Cog, which were designed with basic social cues. Despite knowing these were machines, children persistently tried to engage them as living beings. They asked about the robots' families, offered them toys, and expressed concern when they malfunctioned. When a robot named Kismet would turn toward a child who spoke to it, the child would interpret this programmed response as interest and attention, creating a powerful illusion of relationship. This phenomenon extends beyond childhood. Nursing homes increasingly use therapeutic robots like Paro, a seal-like creature that responds to touch and voice. Elderly residents often develop deep attachments to these robots, talking to them, naming them, and finding comfort in their consistent presence. One nursing home resident explained why she enjoyed Paro: "It's nice to have someone to talk to who doesn't talk back, who doesn't tell you what to do, who just listens." The robot's inability to truly understand becomes, paradoxically, part of its appeal. The rise of sociable robots raises profound questions about what we're willing to accept as companions. These machines offer the appearance of relationship without its reality - they simulate understanding without actually understanding anything. Yet increasingly, people find this simulation satisfying enough. This shift reflects not just our fascination with technology but our changing expectations of relationships themselves. In a busy world where human attention feels increasingly scarce, the predictable responses of robots can feel like a relief.

Chapter 2: From Better Than Nothing to Simply Better

A remarkable transformation occurs in how we think about technological substitutes for human connection. Initially, we approach them with the mindset that they are "better than nothing" - acceptable alternatives when real human connection isn't available. A robot pet might comfort a child who can't have a real animal. A social network might help someone maintain distant friendships. But gradually, almost imperceptibly, this perspective shifts: the technological alternative becomes "simply better" than the human original. This shift happens partly because technology offers certain advantages over human relationships. Robots never tire, never judge, and never have needs of their own. Social media allows us to connect without the vulnerabilities of face-to-face interaction. We can edit our messages until they're perfect, respond when it's convenient, and disengage when conversations become uncomfortable. These advantages make technological connection seem increasingly appealing, especially when human relationships feel demanding or disappointing. The transition from "better than nothing" to "simply better" is particularly evident in care settings. In nursing homes, robot companions like Paro were initially introduced as supplements to human care - something to keep residents company when staff were busy. But soon, both caregivers and residents began to see advantages in the robot's constant availability and unconditional responses. As one nursing director explained: "The residents don't worry about burdening the robot with their problems. They don't worry about the robot getting tired or frustrated with them. It's always there, always patient." What began as a stopgap measure becomes, in some contexts, the preferred option. This pattern extends to how we communicate with each other. Many teenagers now prefer texting to talking on the phone, and messaging to in-person conversations. They value the control that digital communication provides - the ability to craft perfect responses, avoid awkward pauses, and manage their self-presentation. As one sixteen-year-old explained: "When you text, you have more time to think about what you're writing. When you talk, you don't really think about what you're saying as much." What started as a convenient alternative to conversation becomes, for many, the more comfortable default. The danger in this shift isn't technology itself but what it reveals about our willingness to accept simulations of connection rather than the real thing. When we consistently choose the easier, more controlled technological option, we may be protecting ourselves from the vulnerabilities of human relationship, but we're also missing its deepest rewards. Real connection involves risk, unpredictability, and the possibility of rejection - but also the profound satisfaction of being truly known and accepted by another person.

Chapter 3: Digital Natives in an Always-On World

Today's young people are the first generation to grow up with smartphones as a constant presence in their lives. For them, being always connected isn't a new development but the water they swim in. They text while studying, check social media during family dinners, and feel anxious when separated from their phones. This constant connectivity fundamentally alters how they experience time, attention, and relationships. The most visible manifestation of this always-on life is what researchers call "continuous partial attention." Young people rarely focus completely on any single activity or conversation. Instead, they divide their attention among multiple channels - texting while watching TV, scrolling through social media during class, checking notifications while talking with friends. This divided attention becomes habitual, making it increasingly difficult to be fully present even when they want to be. As one college student explained: "I'll be having a conversation with someone, and I'll realize I haven't heard anything they've said because part of my mind was thinking about whether I got a text back." This constant connectivity creates new forms of social pressure and anxiety. Many teenagers describe the stress of always being available and responsive. They feel obligated to answer texts immediately, maintain active social media profiles, and stay updated on their friends' digital lives. The fear of missing out (FOMO) becomes a constant companion, as social media makes visible all the events and interactions they're not part of. One high school student described checking her phone first thing every morning: "I need to know what happened overnight, what conversations I missed, what plans are being made. If I don't check, I might be left out." Perhaps most significantly, the always-on world reshapes young people's experience of solitude. Many describe profound discomfort with unstructured time alone. Without the constant stimulation of notifications and updates, they feel bored, restless, or anxious. Some report never being truly alone with their thoughts - even in moments of physical solitude, they reach for their phones for company. This discomfort with solitude has important implications for development, as the capacity to be alone with one's thoughts is crucial for self-reflection, creativity, and emotional regulation. The relationship between digital natives and their devices goes beyond mere habit or addiction. Their phones function as extensions of themselves - repositories for their memories, connections, and identities. As one teenager put it: "My whole life is on my phone. My friends, my photos, my schedule, my music - everything that matters to me." This integration of technology into identity creates a new kind of vulnerability. Being without a phone doesn't just mean being disconnected; it means being separated from a part of oneself. Despite growing up digital, many young people express ambivalence about their always-on lives. They value the connection and convenience their devices provide but worry about what they're missing. They speak nostalgically about face-to-face conversations, handwritten letters, and the ability to be fully present. This ambivalence reflects a growing awareness that technology shapes not just how they connect but the quality and meaning of those connections.

Chapter 4: The Psychology of Constant Connection

Our relationship with digital technology reveals fascinating aspects of human psychology. We check our phones hundreds of times daily, feel phantom vibrations in our pockets, and experience anxiety when separated from our devices. These behaviors aren't simply habits; they reflect deeper psychological needs and vulnerabilities that technology has become adept at addressing. At the most basic level, our devices tap into our need for social connection. Humans are fundamentally social creatures, evolved to seek belonging and avoid isolation. Our digital devices offer constant access to social feedback - likes, comments, messages that signal we matter to others. This creates a powerful reinforcement cycle. Each notification activates our brain's reward system, releasing small amounts of dopamine that make checking our phones feel pleasurable and checking again seem irresistible. As one neuroscientist explains: "The unpredictable, variable rewards of social media are particularly effective at keeping us engaged, much like a slot machine." Digital technology also addresses our desire for control over social interactions. Face-to-face conversations can feel risky and unpredictable - we might say the wrong thing, reveal too much, or face immediate rejection. Digital communication allows us to edit our self-presentation, respond at our own pace, and maintain emotional distance. This control is especially appealing to those who feel anxious in social situations. As one college student described: "Online, I can be the version of myself I want to be. I can think about what I want to say. I don't have to worry about my awkward laugh or if I'm making weird eye contact." The psychology of constant connection also involves what researchers call "the extended self" - our tendency to incorporate important objects into our sense of identity. Our devices become extensions of our memories, our social connections, and our capabilities. This integration explains why being without our phones can feel like losing a part of ourselves. It's not just about missing calls or texts; it's about being separated from an external system we've come to rely on for managing our lives and relationships. Perhaps most interestingly, our relationship with technology reveals our ambivalence about intimacy itself. We simultaneously desire connection and fear vulnerability. We want to be seen and known by others, but we also want to control how we're perceived. Digital technology offers a compromise: the appearance of connection without its full emotional risks. We can share aspects of ourselves without being fully present or fully exposed. This compromise is both the appeal and the limitation of digital connection. The psychology of constant connection isn't simply about individual choices or weaknesses. It reflects how technology companies have become increasingly sophisticated at designing for human psychology. Apps and platforms are carefully engineered to maximize engagement - to keep us checking, scrolling, and responding. Features like infinite scroll, notification systems, and "streaks" that reward continued use are not accidental; they're deliberate exploitations of our psychological vulnerabilities. Understanding this design element helps us approach technology more mindfully, recognizing when we're being manipulated rather than served.

Chapter 5: Privacy and Vulnerability in the Digital Age

Privacy has undergone a radical transformation in the digital era. Information that once would have been shared with only our closest confidants - our location, our daily activities, our personal thoughts - is now routinely broadcast to wide audiences. This shift represents not just a change in our behavior but in our fundamental understanding of what privacy means and why it matters. The erosion of privacy happens through both visible and invisible mechanisms. Visibly, we voluntarily share personal information on social media, dating apps, and other platforms. We post about our relationships, our health challenges, our political views - creating detailed public records of our lives. Less visibly, our online activities generate vast amounts of data that companies collect, analyze, and monetize. Our searches, purchases, locations, and interactions create digital shadows that follow us across the internet, often without our full awareness or consent. Young people have a particularly complex relationship with privacy. They've grown up in a culture that celebrates sharing and often equates privacy with having "something to hide." Many report feeling that privacy is already lost - a quaint concept from an earlier era. Yet research shows they do care deeply about privacy, just in ways that differ from previous generations. They're less concerned about what information is shared than about who has access to it and in what context. As one teenager explained: "I don't mind my friends seeing everything I post, but I hate the idea of my parents or teachers looking at my profile." The psychology of privacy reveals important paradoxes. We say we value privacy, yet we readily trade it for convenience, connection, or validation. We worry about government surveillance but voluntarily use devices that track our every move. We feel uncomfortable when targeted ads reveal how much companies know about us, yet we continue using the services that enable this tracking. These contradictions reflect genuine confusion about what privacy means in a networked world where the boundaries between public and private have become increasingly blurred. Privacy matters not just as an individual right but as a social good. It creates spaces where we can experiment, make mistakes, and develop our identities without constant observation. It allows for intimacy - the sharing of ourselves with chosen others rather than with everyone. And it protects democratic values by allowing people to develop and express views without fear of surveillance or judgment. When privacy erodes, these vital social functions are compromised. The challenge of privacy in the digital age isn't just technological but psychological and social. We need to develop new norms and expectations about what should be shared and what should remain private. We need to understand the value of privacy not as secrecy but as a form of self-determination - the ability to control how we present ourselves to different audiences in different contexts. And we need to recognize that privacy isn't just about hiding bad things but about protecting good ones - our capacity for intimacy, authenticity, and freedom.

Chapter 6: Redefining Intimacy Through Technology

The digital revolution has fundamentally altered our understanding of intimacy. Traditional intimacy requires vulnerability - revealing ourselves to another person who may reject or misunderstand us. But technology now offers what appears to be intimacy without such risks. We can share our thoughts with thousands of followers without ever having to look anyone in the eye. We can express ourselves through carefully edited messages rather than in the messy give-and-take of real-time conversation. This redefinition of intimacy begins early. Children who grow up with digital pets and sociable robots learn that relationships require attention but not necessarily emotional reciprocity. These digital creatures make demands but never truly challenge their owners. They can be turned off when inconvenient. As one nine-year-old explained about her robot dog: "It's better than a real dog because it won't die or run away. You don't have to worry about it getting sick." This early experience shapes expectations about what relationships should feel like and what they should demand of us. For teenagers and young adults, social media platforms extend this pattern. They allow for connection without the full emotional demands of friendship. A college student explains why she prefers texting to calling: "Texts let you think about what you want to say. You can get it exactly right. When you call, you don't have time to think about what to say, and you can't delete it if it comes out wrong." The ability to edit and control one's self-presentation becomes paramount, while the spontaneity that has traditionally characterized intimate connection is increasingly seen as a liability. Even romantic relationships are transformed by this redefinition of intimacy. Online dating platforms encourage people to present themselves as products, with carefully selected photographs and curated descriptions. Once in relationships, couples often conduct significant portions of their emotional lives through text messages, which can be saved, analyzed, and shared with friends for interpretation. The private space of a relationship expands to include a virtual audience, as relationship milestones are documented and shared online. Perhaps most tellingly, many young people now express anxiety about face-to-face conversation. "It's too real-time," one teenager explained. "You can't think about what to say." Another admitted: "I get nervous talking to people in person because you have to come up with responses right away. There's no backspace, no edit button." This anxiety reveals how profoundly our expectations of communication have shifted - from valuing spontaneity and presence to prioritizing control and performance. This shift has profound implications for our emotional development. If intimacy becomes defined by control rather than vulnerability, by performance rather than authenticity, what happens to our capacity for empathy? If we become accustomed to relationships that we can pause, edit, or exit with the touch of a button, how does this affect our ability to commit to the messy, demanding work of human connection? The redefinition of intimacy through technology doesn't just change how we communicate; it potentially transforms our understanding of what relationships are for and what they should feel like.

Chapter 7: Finding Balance in a Hyperconnected World

Finding balance in our relationship with technology has become one of the defining challenges of our time. We're drawn to our devices for good reasons - they connect us to people we love, give us access to information and entertainment, and help us manage our complex lives. Yet we also sense that something is lost when we live too much of our lives through screens. The question isn't whether to use technology but how to use it in ways that enhance rather than diminish our humanity. Balance begins with awareness - noticing how technology affects our attention, our relationships, and our emotional lives. Many people describe a kind of automatic pilot in their technology use - checking phones without conscious intention, opening apps out of habit rather than purpose. Breaking this automaticity requires mindfulness - the ability to pause and ask: Why am I reaching for my device right now? What am I hoping to gain? What might I be avoiding? These questions create space for more intentional choices about when and how we engage with technology. Setting boundaries is another crucial aspect of balance. These boundaries might be temporal (no phones during dinner), spatial (no devices in the bedroom), or social (agreeing with friends to put phones away during conversations). They might involve using technological solutions to limit technology - apps that block distracting websites or track screen time. The specific boundaries matter less than the act of setting them, which represents taking control rather than being controlled by our devices. As one family therapist observed: "The goal isn't to reject technology but to put it in its proper place - as a tool that serves our values rather than determining them." Balance also involves cultivating what we might call "digital literacy" - not just technical skills but psychological understanding of how different technologies affect us. This includes recognizing that not all screen time is created equal. Video chatting with a grandparent has different value than mindlessly scrolling through social media. Playing a collaborative game with friends offers different benefits than playing alone. Understanding these distinctions helps us make better choices about how we spend our digital time and energy. Perhaps most importantly, balance requires protecting certain human capacities that technology can erode. Solitude - the ability to be comfortably alone with our thoughts - becomes increasingly precious in a connected world. Deep attention - the capacity to focus without distraction - needs to be deliberately practiced. Empathy - truly understanding another's experience - requires presence that multitasking undermines. By valuing and nurturing these capacities, we ensure that technology serves our humanity rather than diminishing it. Finding balance isn't a one-time achievement but an ongoing practice. Technology continues to evolve, and so must our relationship with it. What works in one life stage or context may not work in another. The goal isn't perfection but mindfulness - bringing intention and awareness to how we integrate technology into our lives. With this mindfulness, we can harness technology's benefits while protecting what makes us most deeply human - our capacity for presence, vulnerability, and genuine connection.

Summary

At the heart of our digital dilemma lies a profound paradox: the very technologies that promise to connect us often leave us feeling more isolated. We text during family dinners, check email during conversations, and develop relationships with robots that simulate understanding. We've created a world where we're constantly connected yet increasingly alone - where we expect more from our technology and less from each other. This transformation isn't simply about technology but about our human vulnerabilities. We're drawn to what feels safe and controllable, even when it offers less than what we truly need. The path forward isn't about rejecting technology but about using it more intentionally. We need to reclaim our attention, protect spaces for deep connection, and remember what makes relationships meaningful - not just the exchange of information but the messy, unpredictable experience of being truly present with another person. By bringing greater awareness to how we use technology, we can ensure it enhances rather than diminishes our humanity. For parents and educators, this means modeling healthy technology use and teaching young people to be critical consumers rather than passive users. For all of us, it means asking deeper questions about what we want from our devices and what we want from our lives - recognizing that convenience and connection aren't always the same thing, and that the most meaningful experiences often come with a degree of vulnerability that no algorithm can simulate.

About Author

Loading...

Sherry Turkle

Sherry Turkle is Abby Rockefeller Mauzé Professor of the Social Studies of Science and Technology in the Program in Science, Technology, and Society at MIT and the founder (2001) and current director of the MIT Initiative on Technology and Self. Professor Turkle received a joint doctorate in sociology and personality psychology from Harvard University and is a licensed clinical psychologist.Professor Turkle writes on the "subjective side" of people's relationships with technology, especially computers. She is an expert on mobile technology, social networking, and sociable robotics. Profiles of Professor Turkle have appeared in such publications as The New York Times, Scientific American, and Wired Magazine. She has been named "woman of the year" by Ms. Magazine and among the "forty under forty" who are changing the nation by Esquire Magazine. She is a featured media commentator on the social and psychological effects of technology for CBS, NBC, ABC, CNN, the BBC, and NPR, including appearances on such programs as Nightline, Frontline, 20/20, and The Colbert Report.

Read more

Related Books by Sherry Turkle

Loading...

Reclaiming Conversation

Sherry Turkle

The Power of Talk in a Digital Age

★★★½☆3.8