Ambition

Ambition Plot Summary

Introduction

Human ambition drives us forward in life, pushing us to strive, achieve, and overcome challenges. Yet what happens when we face the inevitable cycles of winning and losing? Our reactions to success and failure can profoundly shape our psychological well-being and future trajectories. While many assume that success always brings happiness and failure leads to despair, the reality is far more complex. Success can be surprisingly difficult to manage, sometimes leading to emptiness or prompting unrealistic expectations. Failure, while painful, often serves as a catalyst for growth and recalibration. Understanding these dynamics helps us navigate life more effectively, maintaining psychological equilibrium despite the unpredictable nature of achievement. The analysis presented examines how humans universally seek a level of "just manageable difficulty" – challenges that are neither too easy nor too hard – and how we adjust our goals, aspirations, and timetables to maintain this optimal balance throughout our lives.

Chapter 1: The Universal Drive for Growth and Mastery

Human beings possess an innate drive for growth and mastery that transcends cultural, historical, and gender differences. This fundamental aspect of human nature can be observed even in our evolutionary relatives. Chimpanzees will work diligently to solve problems without external rewards, driven solely by curiosity and the desire to explore their environment. Similarly, rats placed in new environments will gradually extend their territory, exploring further each day without food incentives. This drive for growth exists across all human societies. While specific goals vary enormously – from wealth accumulation to creative expression, from physical achievements to spiritual enlightenment – the underlying psychological mechanism remains constant. We are not content with what we already know and can do; we want action, growth, and opportunities to test our competence. This is evident from childhood, when toddlers insist "Me do it myself!" and children smile when solving difficult problems but show no emotion when completing easy ones. The drive continues throughout life. Research shows that elderly people in nursing homes who maintain control over seemingly trivial aspects of their lives – choosing when to watch movies, deciding what to eat, arranging their rooms – feel more alert and satisfied than those without such choices. Even in monotonous work environments, people find ways to create challenges, like the assembly-line worker who continuously experimented with ways to shave seconds off his performance time. While cultural differences influence what goals are valued – Western societies emphasizing individual achievement versus Eastern societies prioritizing group harmony – these differences mask the universality of human ambition itself. The drive to master one's environment and grow as a person exists equally across cultures, though expressed through culturally appropriate channels. Similarly, while traditional gender roles may channel men and women toward different areas of achievement, both pursue their chosen domains with equal intensity and dedication. What makes this universal drive remarkable is its persistence despite dramatic changes in human societies over time. Though our specific ambitions evolve with historical circumstances – from religious salvation to material wealth, from physical prowess to intellectual achievement – the fundamental psychological mechanism remains constant. Humans have always sought to master their environment, extend their capabilities, and face meaningful challenges.

Chapter 2: Finding the Sweet Spot: Just Manageable Difficulties

Humans naturally gravitate toward what psychologist Nicholas Hobbs termed "just manageable difficulties" – challenges that test our abilities without overwhelming them. We avoid situations that are too easy, which lead to boredom and apathy, as well as those that are too difficult, which cause anxiety and defeat. This optimal level of challenge exists in a dynamic equilibrium that shifts as our capacities develop or diminish. When we win, we typically raise the level of difficulty to maintain this balance. After successfully running a particular distance, we might aim to go farther or faster next time. When playing against a weaker opponent, we handicap ourselves to make the contest interesting. Success that comes too easily fails to engage us fully. Conversely, when we lose, we tend to lower the difficulty. We might change our methods, extend our timetable, or reduce our expectations until we find a level we can manage. This performance-to-capacity ratio varies among individuals. Some people consistently push themselves to work at 80% or even 90% of their maximum capacity, while others maintain a more sustainable 60%. Yet most people recognize when they're overloaded. The executive promoted beyond their level of competence may find themselves "held together by a thin paste of alcohol, saunas, and antibiotics" – an example of what's familiarly called the Peter Principle, where people rise to their level of incompetence. Our beliefs about our own capacities fundamentally shape how we set these levels. Research shows significant discrepancies between self-perceived abilities and objective measures. In one study of high school students, of those scoring in the lowest ranks on intelligence tests, many believed they were among the highest or above average. Conversely, among students in the top 30% intellectually, a significant number rated themselves as below average. These perceptions, accurate or not, directly influenced their future plans, including college aspirations. These findings help explain one of the most surprising discoveries in happiness research: major social characteristics – including income, education, gender, race, and age – account for only 10-15% of differences in subjective well-being. Studies consistently show that poor people often report being as happy as the wealthy, and older adults are frequently no less satisfied with life than younger ones. This suggests that happiness stems largely from working at the right level of challenge for oneself, a condition available to people at all stations in life.

Chapter 3: Recalibrating After Wins and Losses

Success and failure trigger distinct psychological processes that require careful navigation. When we succeed, we must manage the new challenges that victory brings; when we fail, we must find ways to adapt without losing our drive. The first step in this process is accurately determining whether we've won or lost – a task that isn't always straightforward. In some domains, performance feedback is clear and unambiguous. Sports provide perhaps the clearest example, with standardized measurements and universally understood criteria for success. As one athlete remarked, "When you walk onto the field, you are running into reality." However, in many areas of life – from academic pursuits to creative endeavors to personal relationships – the standards are vague, subjective, or poorly defined. Foundation administrators, for instance, often struggle to determine whether their grants have achieved their intended effects, since there are few objective metrics for social impact. Our assessment of wins and losses is further complicated by information control. Sometimes those who know how we're performing withhold that information. Law firms and universities may keep assistant attorneys or junior faculty in the dark about their promotion prospects to maintain their productivity, even when decisions have already been made. Similarly, in competitive situations, opponents rarely inform us when we have the advantage. This information asymmetry forces us to rely on indirect signals or develop alternative sources of feedback. Once we've determined where we stand, we begin planning our response. Here, two cognitive biases often influence our thinking. First, humans display natural optimism, consistently overestimating their chances of success. Studies show most people believe they will have better-than-average health, longer-than-average lives, and better-than-average marriages. Second, we tend to attribute our successes to our own efforts and abilities, while blaming our failures on external factors like bad luck or unfair circumstances. These biases can impede rational action, but they may serve an evolutionary purpose. Psychologist Lionel Tiger suggests that optimism has been "bred into us" because it enables humans to face challenges with courage rather than retreat in fear. Those with more realistic assessments of their chances – the true pessimists – tend to show higher rates of depression, suggesting optimism may provide psychological protection even when objectively inaccurate. As we plan our next moves, we also consider whether we'll have another chance. Some opportunities are genuinely "once in a lifetime," like Olympic competitions or key career transitions, while others offer multiple attempts. Research shows people prefer having multiple chances even when the mathematical probability of success remains unchanged – evidence of our innate optimism that we can do better next time.

Chapter 4: The Four Methods of Managing Achievement Gaps

When confronted with the gap between our aspirations and achievements, humans employ four distinct methods to restore equilibrium. These methods follow a typical sequence, especially after failure, though individual patterns may vary. The first and most basic method is changing behavior. After a loss, our initial response is usually to work harder or smarter. This might mean increasing effort within the same approach or seeking alternative strategies. A building contractor who can't complete a home within budget might first try finding less expensive materials or more efficient workers. This approach is the most primitive response to achievement gaps and is shared with other animals. While changing behavior is usually our first attempt after failure, interestingly, it rarely appears in our response to success. The second method is adjusting our timetables. When facing difficulties, we extend our timeframes, giving ourselves more opportunity to reach our goals. The contractor might tell clients the house will take eight months instead of six. Conversely, after success, we typically shorten our timetables, believing we can achieve our next goals faster. This approach is distinctly human – animals cannot conceptualize extended time horizons – and requires cognitive development that emerges as we mature beyond early childhood. The third method involves changing our levels of aspiration. We maintain three distinct aspirational levels: the ideal (what we hope for), the minimum (what we will accept), and the realistic (what we actually expect). After failure, we lower these expectations, deciding that a smaller house or fewer features will be sufficient. After success, we raise them, believing we can achieve more than originally planned. This adjustment helps maintain psychological equilibrium by bringing aspirations into alignment with perceived capabilities. The fourth and final method is changing our goals entirely. This is typically our last resort after failure, employed only when other methods prove insufficient. The contractor might abandon home construction to become a real estate agent instead. After success, however, we often add new goals readily, expanding our ambitions into new domains. This process explains why achievement rarely brings lasting satisfaction – we quickly move on to new challenges. The sequence of these methods typically proceeds from behavior to timetables to aspirations to goals, though individual patterns vary. What's remarkable is how this process enables humans to maintain psychological equilibrium despite constant fluctuation in their external circumstances. By adjusting these four elements, we keep ourselves engaged at the optimal level of "just manageable difficulty" throughout our lives, regardless of our objective situations.

Chapter 5: Time, Aspirations, and Goals: Strategic Adjustments

Time serves as a fundamental dimension through which we manage success and failure. Society establishes various timetables that regulate our achievements: how quickly we should accomplish tasks, at what age we should reach certain milestones, how long we should remain in particular roles, and when we should enter or exit different life stages. These social expectations significantly influence our personal timetables, though we maintain considerable freedom to adjust them based on our experiences. Career trajectories illustrate how these timetables operate. In ordered careers like the military, advancement follows predictable patterns based on time served. In episodic careers like entertainment or entrepreneurship, success follows less predictable timelines. Similarly, fields vary in their age of peak performance: mathematical and scientific breakthroughs often come in one's twenties or thirties, while literary achievements may peak in the forties or fifties. Physically demanding occupations impose their own biological timetables, with decline beginning earlier than in intellectual pursuits. When we encounter failure, extending our timetables provides immediate psychological relief. After the 1987 stock market crash, investors who had planned to become wealthy in five years adjusted their expectations to seven or ten years. When we succeed, we compress our timetables, believing we can achieve our next goals more quickly. A writer who completes a productive morning might mentally reduce the time needed to finish her book; an athlete after an exceptional performance might see professional success arriving sooner than anticipated. While timetable adjustments help manage immediate psychological responses, aspiration adjustments represent a deeper accommodation to reality. We adjust not only when we expect to achieve our goals but how much we expect to achieve. Research shows that as professionals age, they typically reduce their career aspirations. A study of AT&T executives found that within a few years of joining the company, most had scaled back their ambitions from reaching the highest corporate levels to more modest positions. The lottery winner represents an extreme case of aspiration management. Suddenly possessing the means to achieve almost any material goal, winners must recalibrate their entire aspiration structure. Research shows they often struggle with this process, frequently reporting that ordinary activities become less enjoyable. One winner remarked, "It was much easier when I was just a simple baker." This counterintuitive response demonstrates how critical the balance between capability and challenge is to human satisfaction. The most profound adjustment comes when we change our goals entirely. While timetable and aspiration adjustments preserve our fundamental aims, goal changes represent a more radical reorientation. After persistent failure, we may abandon pursuits that once defined us. Those who never achieve their dreams of artistic success may eventually redirect their creative energies toward teaching or appreciation rather than production. This process, while potentially painful, allows us to find new domains where we can experience the satisfaction of growth and mastery.

Chapter 6: The Myth vs. Reality of Life Stages and Change

The popular notion that human lives follow predetermined stages with predictable crises and transitions represents a simplification of a much more complex reality. While certain biological developments occur in relatively fixed sequences during childhood, adult development follows far more variable patterns. Significant life events that supposedly characterize specific age periods actually happen at widely different times for different individuals, if they happen at all. The belief that we are constrained by rigid developmental stages contrasts sharply with growing evidence of our capacity for change throughout life. Early theories emphasized how childhood experiences permanently shape adult personality, but contemporary research reveals remarkable plasticity even in mature individuals. The biomedical and psychological sciences now recognize that nearly every molecule in our bodies is replaced multiple times throughout our lifespan. New technologies enable changes in our bodies and behaviors that were once thought impossible. This revolution in understanding human development should shift our perspective from the "one-shot vaccination" model of improvement to a continuous investment in betterment throughout life. It also liberates parents from undeserved guilt, recognizing that children are more resilient than previously believed, and that early experiences, while influential, need not determine ultimate outcomes. The course of development remains open to intervention at many points. As we move through life, we actively rewrite our personal histories to maintain a sense of continuity amid change and to enhance our self-respect. This reconstruction serves both psychological and social purposes. Psychologically, it helps us integrate past experiences into a coherent narrative that explains our current situation. Socially, it allows us to present a consistent self-image to others. While this process involves some selective remembering and forgetting, it remains constrained by social reality – others who shared our experiences may challenge radical revisions. The concept of the "midlife crisis" exemplifies how developmental myths become cultural scripts. Research reveals that few middle-aged people actually experience anything they would describe as a crisis. What does occur during midlife is a gradual shift in how people manage achievement gaps. As time becomes finite rather than indefinite, and as the ratio of performance demands to capacities reaches its peak, individuals increasingly turn to adjusting aspirations and goals rather than behavior or timetables. This represents an adaptive evolution in coping strategies rather than a dramatic rupture. Similarly, the belief that ambition diminishes with age misinterprets what actually occurs. The drive for growth and mastery continues throughout life, but its expression changes. What appears as diminished ambition often reflects greater wisdom about what brings satisfaction. Older adults may pursue less grandiose goals, but they continue to seek challenges appropriate to their capacities. Living at the level of "just manageable difficulty" provides as much happiness in later years as in youth and midlife, even when the absolute level of achievement has declined.

Chapter 7: Maintaining Challenge Across the Lifespan

The enduring quest for appropriate challenges continues throughout our entire lives, from infancy to old age. This fundamental aspect of human psychology explains why many apparent "winners" in life – those who have reached the pinnacles of success in their fields – often find themselves at a crossroads. Having achieved their highest goals, they must find new mountains to climb or risk psychological stagnation. William Faulkner captured this dilemma when discussing the impossibility of creative perfection: "Once he did it, once he matched the work to the image, the dream, nothing would remain but to cut his throat, jump off the other side of that pinnacle of perfection into suicide." Those who navigate this challenge successfully typically expand into new domains rather than attempting to surpass their achievements in the same field. Astronauts become politicians or religious seekers; musicians branch into new genres; actors become activists. The emptiness that sometimes follows major achievement stems from three primary sources. First, the pursuit may have consumed so much energy that other life domains have been neglected, creating imbalance. Second, if success is attributed to external factors rather than personal effort, individuals may feel like imposters rather than legitimate achievers. Third, the goal itself may prove less satisfying than anticipated. These disappointments reflect the universal truth that the satisfaction from achievement is temporary – we naturally move on to new challenges. For those facing persistent failure, the process of relinquishing long-held goals requires considerable psychological adjustment. Some individuals hold on tenaciously, continuing to pursue dreams long after reasonable prospects of success have faded. Others more readily abandon failing endeavors and redirect their energies. Neither approach is inherently superior – the appropriate response depends on the specific goal, its importance to one's identity, and the availability of meaningful alternatives. The families we create provide another avenue for maintaining challenge across the lifespan. When our own achievements fall short of our aspirations, we often transfer our ambitions to children or protégés. While this can become destructive if expectations are unrealistic, it also represents a natural extension of human striving beyond individual limitations. A contractor who never built his dream house may support his daughter's architectural education; a musician who never achieved fame may teach extraordinary students. Throughout all these transitions, the fundamental human drive for growth and mastery remains constant. The challenges we seek may diminish in objective scale as we age, but they maintain the same subjective difficulty relative to our capacities. From the baby fascinated by a mobile above his crib to the centenarian tending window box flowers, we continue to seek activities that engage us at the level of "just manageable difficulty" – neither so easy as to be boring nor so difficult as to be defeating.

Summary

The universal human drive for growth and mastery manifests throughout our lives as we continuously seek challenges that match our capacities. This pursuit of what might be called "just manageable difficulties" – challenges neither too easy nor too demanding – represents a fundamental aspect of human psychology that transcends culture, gender, and historical period. When we succeed or fail in our endeavors, we employ four primary methods to restore equilibrium: changing behavior, adjusting timetables, modifying aspirations, and revising goals. The insight that happiness derives largely from engagement with appropriate challenges explains why objective circumstances like wealth, age, or social position have surprisingly little impact on subjective well-being. Those who master the art of calibrating their challenges – finding new mountains to climb after success, scaling back ambitions realistically after failure – maintain psychological equilibrium despite life's inevitable fluctuations. This perspective offers a powerful framework for understanding human ambition, not as a fixed trait destined to decline with age, but as an adaptable force that continues to drive personal growth and development throughout the entire lifespan.

About Author

Loading...

Gilbert Brim

Read more