Becoming Beauvoir

Becoming Beauvoir Plot Summary

Introduction

On a crisp January morning in 1949, a book appeared in Parisian bookshops that would change the way humanity thought about gender. Its author, a 41-year-old philosopher with piercing eyes and an uncompromising intellect, had spent years examining what it meant to be a woman in a world defined by men. When Simone de Beauvoir declared "One is not born, but rather becomes, a woman," she articulated a revolutionary idea that would reverberate through generations: womanhood was not a biological destiny but a social construction. This insight emerged not from abstract theorizing but from a life lived in defiance of convention—a life dedicated to freedom, authenticity, and the pursuit of knowledge. Beauvoir's journey from dutiful Catholic daughter to groundbreaking feminist philosopher reveals the evolution of one of the 20th century's most formidable minds. Through her experiences as a student, teacher, writer, and activist, she developed a philosophical approach that emphasized the situated nature of human freedom—we are always free, but never in the abstract, always within concrete historical and social circumstances. Her intellectual partnership with Jean-Paul Sartre, her unconventional personal relationships, and her political engagements all informed her understanding of how individuals create meaning in an absurd world. In exploring Beauvoir's life and thought, we discover not only the origins of modern feminist theory but also a model of intellectual courage and ethical commitment that continues to inspire those seeking to live authentically in complicated times.

Chapter 1: Early Years: The Making of a Revolutionary Mind

Simone de Beauvoir was born on January 9, 1908, into a bourgeois Parisian family whose comfortable lifestyle masked growing financial troubles. Her father, Georges, was a legal secretary with theatrical aspirations and a love for literature that he passed on to his daughter. Her mother, Françoise, was a devoutly Catholic woman who initially educated Simone at home before sending her to the prestigious Catholic school, Cours Désir. This upbringing created a fascinating tension in Beauvoir's early life—between her father's secular intellectualism and her mother's religious devotion, between the family's aristocratic pretensions and their declining fortunes. From her earliest years, Beauvoir displayed an extraordinary intellect and a voracious appetite for reading. By age eight, she had already written her first stories, and by adolescence, she was keeping philosophical diaries that revealed her remarkable ambition and self-awareness. "I want my life to be a beautiful thing," she wrote as a teenager, already showing the determination to shape her own destiny rather than accept conventional paths. Her childhood diaries reveal a precocious mind grappling with existential questions about God, meaning, and her place in the world—themes that would occupy her throughout her philosophical career. The defining moment in Beauvoir's intellectual awakening came during her adolescence when she lost her faith in God. This crisis of faith was not merely religious but existential—without God, she realized she alone was responsible for creating meaning in her life. "When I was about fourteen," she later wrote, "I decided that I did not believe in God because I could not accept that anyone, even a divine being, could be wiser than I." This bold assertion of intellectual autonomy marked the beginning of her philosophical journey and devastated her mother, creating a rift that would never fully heal. The financial collapse of her family after World War I profoundly shaped Beauvoir's outlook. Her father's investments became worthless, forcing the family to move to a smaller apartment and adopt a more modest lifestyle. This decline in status made Beauvoir acutely aware of class differences and the precariousness of social position. It also strengthened her resolve to achieve financial independence through education and career—a radical ambition for a woman in early 20th century France. "I would earn my living and be dependent on no one," she determined, rejecting the traditional path of marriage and domesticity that her mother envisioned for her. Beauvoir's education at the Sorbonne, where she studied philosophy alongside other brilliant minds of her generation, provided the formal training that would shape her thinking. As one of only a handful of female students in philosophy, she encountered both intellectual stimulation and gender discrimination. It was here that she first encountered phenomenology and existentialism, philosophical approaches that would profoundly influence her work. Her academic excellence was remarkable—she placed second in the highly competitive agrégation examination in 1929, bested only by Jean-Paul Sartre, with whom she would form a lifelong intellectual partnership. The tragic death of her childhood friend Elisabeth "Zaza" Lacoin in 1929 deeply affected Beauvoir. Zaza, trapped by bourgeois conventions and family expectations, died shortly after being forbidden to marry the man she loved. This tragedy crystallized for Beauvoir the dangers of conforming to societal expectations and reinforced her determination to live freely. "For a long time I believed that I had paid for my own freedom with her death," Beauvoir later wrote, revealing how this loss shaped her commitment to women's liberation and her understanding of the high stakes involved in challenging social norms.

Chapter 2: Breaking Free: Intellectual Rebellion and Loss of Faith

By her early twenties, Beauvoir had rejected the conventional paths available to women of her time—marriage, motherhood, and domestic life. Instead, she chose financial independence through teaching and intellectual pursuits. This decision, radical for a woman in 1930s France, established the foundation for her future philosophical explorations of freedom, authenticity, and the human condition. When she began teaching philosophy at lycées in Marseille, Rouen, and finally Paris, she experienced a profound sense of liberation. "To pass the agrégation and have a profession was something he took for granted," she wrote of Sartre. "But when I stood at the top of that flight of steps in Marseille, I had turned dizzy with sheer delight: it seemed to me that, far from enduring my destiny, I had deliberately chosen it." Her meeting with Jean-Paul Sartre in 1929, while preparing for the agrégation examination in philosophy, marked the beginning of what would become one of the most famous intellectual partnerships of the twentieth century. Their initial connection was intellectual—they recognized in each other minds of equal caliber, a rarity for Beauvoir who had seldom encountered men who respected her intelligence. They established a "pact" that would define their relationship: they would be each other's essential love while allowing "contingent" relationships with others. This arrangement reflected their philosophical commitment to freedom and authenticity, though it would later prove more complicated in practice than in theory. The 1930s were formative years for Beauvoir's philosophical development. Though not yet publishing philosophy under her own name, she was engaged in intense intellectual exchange with Sartre and their circle, which included Raymond Aron, Maurice Merleau-Ponty, and Claude Lévi-Strauss. She began developing her own philosophical voice through her early writings, working on a collection of short stories, When Things of the Spirit Come First, though it wouldn't be published until decades later. These stories explored the stifling effects of bourgeois morality on young women—a theme inspired by her own experiences and the tragic fate of her friend Zaza. World War II and the German occupation of France marked another turning point in Beauvoir's intellectual development. Though she and Sartre were not active in the Resistance, the experience of occupation confronted her with political realities she could no longer ignore. The daily moral compromises required to survive under Nazi rule deepened her understanding of human freedom as always situated within historical and social contexts. The war also cost her her teaching position—she was dismissed on charges of corrupting a minor, though the real motivation was likely political. This forced career change led her to focus on writing full-time, a shift that would ultimately allow her to develop her philosophical ideas more fully. By the end of the war, Beauvoir had transformed from a relatively apolitical intellectual into a philosopher deeply concerned with social and political questions. She had begun to develop her own philosophical voice distinct from Sartre's, particularly in her understanding of situated freedom. Her first philosophical essay, Pyrrhus and Cinéas (1944), already showed her divergence from Sartre's more abstract conception of freedom, as she insisted that freedom must be understood in relation to the concrete situations in which human beings find themselves. "It is in the knowledge of the genuine conditions of our life that we must draw our strength to live and our reason for acting," she wrote, emphasizing that freedom must be exercised within concrete historical and social contexts. The publication of her first novel, She Came to Stay, in 1943 established Beauvoir as a significant literary voice. The novel, which drew on her experiences with her student Olga Kosakiewicz, explored the philosophical problem of "the opposition of self and other" that had preoccupied her since the 1920s. Through fiction, Beauvoir was able to examine the complexities of human relationships and the challenges of recognizing others as both similar to and different from oneself. This theme—how consciousness encounters other consciousnesses—would remain central to her philosophical work, including her feminist analysis of women as "the Other" in relation to men.

Chapter 3: The Second Sex: Creating a Feminist Philosophy

In 1946, while planning an autobiographical essay, Beauvoir found herself contemplating what it had meant for her to be a woman. This seemingly simple question led her down an unexpected intellectual path that would culminate in her groundbreaking work. As she later recounted, "I had never had any feeling of inferiority, no one had ever said to me: 'You think that way because you are a woman.' My femaleness had never been a nuisance to me in any way." Yet as she began to examine the question more deeply, she realized that her experience was exceptional, and that womanhood itself was profoundly shaped by social forces that systematically disadvantaged women. What began as a personal reflection quickly expanded into a comprehensive philosophical investigation. Beauvoir immersed herself in extensive research, reading widely across disciplines—biology, psychoanalysis, history, anthropology, literature—to understand how "woman" had been constructed throughout human civilization. She worked with extraordinary intensity, often writing for ten hours a day at cafés like the Deux Magots and Café de Flore. The manuscript grew so large that her publisher, Gallimard, decided to publish it in two volumes: the first examining myths and facts about women, the second analyzing women's lived experience from childhood through old age. The philosophical significance of The Second Sex lay in its application of existentialist concepts to women's situation. Beauvoir argued that women had been denied transcendence—the active creation of meaning through projects—and confined to immanence, or passive existence. Women were defined not as autonomous subjects but as relative beings, always in relation to men. Her famous declaration that "One is not born, but rather becomes, a woman" articulated a revolutionary distinction between biological sex and socially constructed gender, challenging the notion that women's subordination was natural or inevitable. This insight would become foundational to feminist theory in the decades that followed. When published in France in 1949, The Second Sex provoked immediate controversy. The chapter on female sexuality, published in advance in Les Temps Modernes, particularly scandalized French society. The Catholic writer François Mauriac famously declared that Beauvoir had "left nothing hidden of Madame de Beauvoir." Conservative critics accused her of obscenity, neurosis, and man-hating. Even progressive intellectuals often missed the philosophical depth of her analysis, reducing it to a complaint about women's condition rather than recognizing it as a fundamental critique of how humanity had been defined in masculine terms. Despite the controversy—or perhaps because of it—the book sold 22,000 copies in its first week. Beauvoir's methodology in The Second Sex was as revolutionary as her conclusions. She combined philosophical analysis with attention to concrete experience, drawing on women's testimonies, literary representations, and her own observations. This approach—examining how abstract concepts play out in lived reality—would become characteristic of her philosophical work. She insisted that philosophy must engage with the messiness of actual human lives rather than remaining in the realm of abstract theory. This methodological innovation helped make her work accessible to readers beyond academic philosophy and contributed to its enduring influence. The Second Sex was not merely an intellectual exercise but a call to action. Beauvoir concluded that women's liberation required both material changes in their situation and a transformation in consciousness. Women needed economic independence, reproductive freedom, and access to education, but they also needed to overcome their own internalized sense of inferiority. "The point is not for women simply to take power out of men's hands, since that wouldn't change anything about the world. It's a question precisely of destroying that notion of power," she wrote. This dual emphasis on structural change and personal transformation would become central to feminist politics in the decades that followed.

Chapter 4: Love and Freedom: Redefining Personal Relationships

Beauvoir's personal relationships were laboratories where she tested and refined her philosophical ideas about freedom, authenticity, and reciprocity. Her lifelong relationship with Jean-Paul Sartre has often been romanticized as the perfect intellectual partnership, but the reality was more complex. Their "pact" allowed each to pursue other relationships while maintaining their primary bond. For Beauvoir, this arrangement offered both liberation and pain, as she navigated the emotional complexities that their philosophical principles sometimes failed to address. "What we have is an essential love," Sartre told her in 1929, "but it is a good idea for us also to experience contingent love affairs." Beyond Sartre, Beauvoir formed significant relationships with several men and women throughout her life. Her affair with American novelist Nelson Algren, which began during her 1947 lecture tour of the United States, revealed a passionate side of her rarely seen in her relationship with Sartre. In her letters to Algren, she expressed a physical desire and emotional vulnerability that contrasted with her public image of cool intellectual detachment. When their relationship ended, partly due to the geographical distance and her unwillingness to leave Paris permanently, she was deeply wounded. "I was not born to be alone," she wrote to him, revealing the tension between her commitment to independence and her desire for connection. In 1952, at age 44, Beauvoir began a relationship with Claude Lanzmann, a journalist seventeen years her junior. This relationship challenged her own internalized ageism—she had believed her sexual life was over and had "dutifully retired to the shelf." With Lanzmann, she experienced a renewal of passion and shared seven years of her life, even living together—something she never did with Sartre. The relationship ended painfully, but they maintained a professional relationship, working together on Les Temps Modernes, the influential journal she co-founded with Sartre. Throughout her life, Beauvoir grappled with the question of what authentic love might look like. In The Second Sex, she critiqued traditional romantic love as often requiring women to sacrifice their autonomy. In her 1950 article "It's About Time Women Put a New Face on Love," she asked: "Is it not possible to conceive a new kind of love in which both partners are equals—one not seeking submission to the other?" This question reflected her lifelong search for relationships that could combine freedom with commitment, independence with connection. Her own experiences revealed both the possibilities and challenges of this search. Beauvoir's relationships with women were not limited to friendships. Her letters and diaries, published posthumously, revealed physical relationships with several women, including her former students Bianca Bienenfeld and Nathalie Sorokine. These relationships complicated the public image of Beauvoir, revealing aspects of her sexuality that she had chosen not to disclose during her lifetime. They also raised questions about the power dynamics between Beauvoir and her much younger students, reflecting ethical complexities she did not fully address in her philosophical work. These revelations have prompted important discussions about power, ethics, and accountability in feminist practice. In her later years, Beauvoir formed a deep bond with Sylvie Le Bon, a philosophy student who first wrote to her in 1960. Their relationship grew into what Beauvoir described as a "mutually intertwined" life, with Le Bon eventually becoming her adopted daughter and literary executor. This relationship offered Beauvoir the reciprocity and understanding she had long sought, combining intellectual companionship with emotional intimacy. It demonstrated her continuing capacity for deep connection even as she aged, challenging stereotypes about older women's emotional and intellectual lives.

Chapter 5: Political Activism: From Theory to Practice

The 1950s marked a significant shift in Beauvoir's public persona as she became increasingly engaged with political causes. The Algerian War of Independence (1954-1962) proved particularly galvanizing. Beauvoir vocally opposed French colonialism, signing the "Manifesto of the 121" which defended the right of French soldiers to refuse service in Algeria. She also wrote a powerful defense of Djamila Boupacha, an Algerian woman who had been tortured by French soldiers. Her stance was not without consequences—she received death threats, her apartment was threatened with bombing, and she was monitored by French intelligence services. This period revealed Beauvoir's moral courage and her willingness to risk her safety and reputation for her political convictions. Beauvoir's political engagement extended beyond Algeria to include broader anti-colonial movements and opposition to the Vietnam War. She traveled extensively, visiting the Soviet Union, China, Cuba, Egypt, Israel, and many other countries. These journeys were not mere tourism but opportunities to witness different social systems and political struggles firsthand. Her travelogues, such as America Day by Day (1948) and The Long March (1957), combined personal observations with political analysis. In America, she was particularly struck by racial segregation, which she analyzed with insights drawn from her understanding of how societies create categories of "otherness." By the late 1960s, Beauvoir had embraced feminism as a political movement. Though she had long analyzed women's oppression, she had initially distanced herself from organized feminism, which she associated with bourgeois reformism rather than radical change. This changed in 1970 when she joined the nascent French women's liberation movement. She lent her considerable prestige to feminist causes, most notably by signing the "Manifesto of the 343" in 1971, which declared that the signatories had had abortions, then illegal in France. This public declaration helped pave the way for the legalization of abortion in 1975. "No woman," she insisted, "should be forced to have a child she doesn't want." Throughout the 1970s, Beauvoir used her considerable public platform to advocate for feminist causes. She gave interviews, wrote prefaces for feminist books, participated in demonstrations, and supported younger activists. She co-founded the feminist journal Questions Féministes and became president of the League for Women's Rights, campaigning vigorously for reproductive freedom, equal pay, and an end to sexist discrimination. Her activism during this period helped bridge the gap between her theoretical analysis in The Second Sex and concrete political change. It also demonstrated her willingness to evolve in her thinking—from seeing feminism as a distraction from class struggle to recognizing it as a necessary component of human liberation. In her later years, Beauvoir turned her attention to the plight of the elderly, publishing Old Age (1970), a comprehensive study of how society marginalizes older people. Just as she had analyzed women's oppression in The Second Sex, she now examined how the aged were made "Other" by a society that valued productivity and youth. "Society cares about the individual only insofar as he is profitable," she wrote, exposing the economic logic behind the marginalization of the elderly. This work reflected her growing concern with forms of oppression beyond gender and her commitment to exposing injustice wherever she found it. Throughout her political activism, Beauvoir maintained her independence of thought. Though aligned with the Left, she was not uncritical of communist regimes. She valued her freedom to criticize all sides and refused to be bound by party lines. This independence sometimes put her at odds with former allies, but it reflected her lifelong commitment to intellectual honesty and her refusal to sacrifice truth for political expediency. Her approach to politics was always informed by her existentialist ethics, which emphasized the importance of freedom, responsibility, and engagement with the concrete situations in which human beings find themselves.

Chapter 6: Writing as Rebellion: Literary Legacy

Beauvoir's literary output was remarkably diverse, spanning philosophy, fiction, autobiography, and political writing. She moved fluidly between genres, using each to explore different aspects of human experience and to reach different audiences. Her writing was both an intellectual project and a form of rebellion against conventional thinking about gender, freedom, and social relations. Through her work, she created new possibilities for women's self-expression and challenged the boundaries between literature and philosophy. Her first published novel, She Came to Stay (1943), drew on her experiences with Olga Kosakiewicz to explore the philosophical problem of "the opposition of self and other." The novel depicts a triangular relationship between a couple and a younger woman they invite into their lives, examining how each consciousness seeks to assert itself against others. With its existentialist themes and psychological depth, the novel established Beauvoir as a significant literary voice in occupied France. It also revealed her ability to transform personal experience into philosophical exploration, a characteristic that would define her approach to writing throughout her career. The Blood of Others (1945), published shortly after the Liberation, was her "Resistance novel," exploring questions of political engagement and moral responsibility during wartime. The Mandarins (1954), which won the prestigious Prix Goncourt, provided a panoramic view of postwar intellectual life in Paris, examining the ethical and political dilemmas facing intellectuals in the Cold War era. These novels were not merely illustrations of philosophical ideas but complex explorations of how abstract principles play out in concrete human situations. Through fiction, Beauvoir could explore the ambiguities and contradictions of human experience in ways that philosophical treatises often could not. In the 1960s, Beauvoir turned to autobiography, producing four volumes that chronicled her life from childhood to old age: Memoirs of a Dutiful Daughter (1958), The Prime of Life (1960), Force of Circumstance (1963), and All Said and Done (1972). These works were revolutionary in their candor about a woman's life, including frank discussions of sexuality, ambition, and aging. They also provided insight into the intellectual and cultural life of twentieth-century France, documenting Beauvoir's relationships with major figures like Sartre, Camus, and Merleau-Ponty. Through autobiography, Beauvoir claimed the right to narrate her own life, refusing to let others define her experience. A Very Easy Death (1964), Beauvoir's account of her mother's final illness and death, broke another taboo by confronting mortality with unflinching honesty. This slim volume revealed Beauvoir's capacity for compassion and her ability to find philosophical meaning in personal loss. It also demonstrated her commitment to truth-telling, even when that truth was painful or socially unacceptable. The book became a touchstone for discussions of aging, illness, and end-of-life care, influencing both medical ethics and literary approaches to mortality. Through this work, Beauvoir continued her project of bringing philosophical attention to aspects of human experience often ignored by traditional philosophy. Throughout her career, Beauvoir faced criticism that diminished her literary achievements. Her work was often dismissed as "autobiographical" or "derivative" of Sartre's, reflecting sexist assumptions about women's writing. Critics accused her of writing "thesis novels" that sacrificed artistic quality for philosophical or political messages. She defended herself against these charges, arguing in her essay "Literature and Metaphysics" (1945) that the novel could be both a work of art and a vehicle for philosophical exploration. Time has vindicated her position, as contemporary critics increasingly recognize the literary sophistication of her work and its importance in breaking down artificial boundaries between genres.

Chapter 7: Global Impact: Continuing Influence on Feminist Thought

Simone de Beauvoir's intellectual legacy spans philosophy, literature, and feminist theory, making her one of the most influential thinkers of the twentieth century. Her philosophical contributions, long overshadowed by Sartre's, have received increasing recognition in recent decades. Scholars now acknowledge her distinctive approach to existentialism, which emphasized the situated nature of human freedom and the importance of embodiment. Her concept of the "situated subject"—a consciousness always embedded in a particular historical, social, and physical context—has proven especially valuable for understanding how freedom operates within constraints. In feminist theory, Beauvoir's influence has been nothing short of revolutionary. Her distinction between sex and gender, her analysis of woman as "Other," and her understanding of how patriarchy functions through myths and social institutions provided conceptual tools that would shape feminist thought for generations. When Betty Friedan published The Feminine Mystique in 1963, sparking the second wave of feminism in America, she acknowledged her debt to Beauvoir. Kate Millett, Shulamith Firestone, and other radical feminists of the 1970s built upon Beauvoir's analysis, even as they sometimes criticized her for not going far enough in her critique of patriarchy. Contemporary feminist philosophers as diverse as Judith Butler, Martha Nussbaum, and bell hooks continue to engage with Beauvoir's ideas, testifying to their enduring relevance. Beauvoir's impact extended far beyond Western feminism. In Japan, where The Second Sex was published in 1953, it influenced both feminist activism and literature. In India, her work has been engaged by postcolonial feminists examining the intersection of gender with other forms of oppression. In Latin America, her existentialist ethics resonated with liberation movements. This global reception demonstrates the adaptability of her ideas to diverse cultural and political circumstances. It also reflects her own internationalist perspective—she was always interested in how women's experiences varied across cultures while maintaining that certain forms of oppression were nearly universal. Contemporary feminist movements continue to draw inspiration from Beauvoir's insights. The #MeToo movement's emphasis on women speaking their experiences echoes Beauvoir's insistence that women must become subjects rather than objects of discourse. Intersectional feminism's attention to how gender interacts with race, class, and sexuality builds on her understanding of how different aspects of identity shape one's situation. Even debates about transgender rights engage with her distinction between biological sex and social gender, though interpreting it in ways Beauvoir herself could not have anticipated. Her work remains vital precisely because it offers conceptual tools that can be adapted to address emerging questions about gender and justice. Beyond her theoretical contributions, Beauvoir's life itself became a model of intellectual courage and ethical commitment. She demonstrated that a woman could live as a free subject, pursuing intellectual and creative work on her own terms. She showed that philosophy could be engaged with concrete human problems rather than abstract puzzles. And she exemplified how an intellectual could use her privilege and platform to advocate for justice and freedom for others. Her example continues to inspire those who seek to combine theoretical insight with political engagement, intellectual rigor with moral passion. In the decades since her death in 1986, scholarly assessment of Beauvoir has evolved significantly. Once dismissed as merely Sartre's companion or disciple, she is now recognized as a major philosopher in her own right, whose work sometimes anticipated and often diverged from Sartre's. Feminist scholars have recovered the originality of her philosophical contributions and demonstrated her influence on subsequent thought. The publication of her letters and diaries has revealed new dimensions of her life and work, complicating but ultimately enriching our understanding of this remarkable thinker who insisted that freedom must be continuously created through our choices and actions.

Summary

Simone de Beauvoir's life and work embodied a fundamental truth: freedom is not something we possess but something we achieve through our choices and actions in a world that often constrains us. Her journey from bourgeois daughter to revolutionary philosopher demonstrates how intellectual courage, combined with ethical commitment, can transform not only an individual life but human understanding itself. From her groundbreaking analysis of gender as a social construction to her insistence that authentic freedom requires recognizing the freedom of others, Beauvoir's ideas continue to challenge and inspire. Her example teaches us to question received wisdom, to examine how social structures shape our experiences, and to take responsibility for creating meaning in our lives. What makes Beauvoir's legacy so enduring is her refusal to separate theory from practice, intellect from emotion, or individual freedom from social responsibility. She showed that philosophical ideas matter most when they engage with the concrete realities of human lives. For those seeking to understand the complexities of gender, the challenges of authentic relationship, or the possibilities of ethical action in an unjust world, Beauvoir offers not easy answers but conceptual tools and moral inspiration. Her work speaks with particular power to anyone who has felt defined by others rather than self-defined, anyone who seeks to reconcile personal freedom with commitment to others, and anyone who believes that understanding the world is inseparable from trying to change it.

About Author

Loading...

Kate Kirkpatrick

Read more