Boys & Sex

Boys & Sex Plot Summary

Introduction

Modern masculinity stands at a critical crossroads. As society evolves, traditional notions of what it means to be a man increasingly clash with emerging values of equality, emotional intelligence, and mutual respect. This tension creates both crisis and opportunity in boys' development, as they navigate contradictory messages about their identity, sexuality, and relationships. The rigid masculine code that once seemed immutable now reveals its costs—not only to women and gender-diverse individuals but to boys and men themselves, who find their full humanity constrained by outdated expectations. The transformation of masculine identity represents one of our era's most urgent social challenges. By examining how boys learn about gender, relationships, and sexuality, we gain crucial insights into both problematic behaviors and potential pathways toward healthier masculinity. This exploration moves beyond simplistic narratives of individual moral failings to uncover the systemic factors shaping male development. Through rigorous analysis of research, personal narratives, and cultural patterns, a more nuanced understanding emerges—one that offers practical strategies for parents, educators, and young men themselves to cultivate masculinity centered on emotional intelligence, ethical engagement, and authentic connection rather than dominance, stoicism, and conquest.

Chapter 1: The Masculine Code: How Emotional Suppression Shapes Boys' Identity

The socialization of boys into traditional masculinity begins remarkably early, with research showing that while infant boys are naturally as emotionally expressive as girls, adults respond differently to their emotional displays. Mothers typically speak more to daughters and employ richer emotional vocabulary with them, while with sons, the emotional focus narrows primarily to anger. By kindergarten, boys have already internalized the expectation to disconnect from feelings, avoid vulnerability, and adopt more hierarchical behaviors with peers. This emotional suppression creates profound psychological consequences as boys develop. Many describe building an internal "wall" behind which they hide their authentic feelings, particularly those associated with vulnerability, fear, or sadness. This emotional detachment becomes enforced through powerful linguistic policing—terms like "fag," "pussy," and "bitch" function as social controls that maintain rigid masculine boundaries and punish any deviation from the accepted "boy code." The result is a generation of young men who feel denied the full range of human expression. Sports environments, while potentially beneficial for teaching cooperation and perseverance, frequently intensify toxic masculinity. Many boys report abandoning sports they enjoyed because they couldn't tolerate the "Lord of the Flies" mentality perpetuated by teammates or coaches. The "jock culture" that uses values like courage and integrity as cover for bullying, entitlement, and aggression creates spaces where loyalty to the team supersedes all other ethical considerations, including respect for others' dignity. The language boys use to discuss sexual experiences further reinforces emotional disconnection. When describing encounters with female partners to male peers, they often employ violent terminology—they nail, pound, bang, smash, or hammer. This language isn't actually about sex but about power—asserting masculinity through control of women's bodies, which requires denying girls' humanity. Such desensitizing language makes it easier for boys to objectify partners and ignore their personhood. Perhaps most troubling is how humor becomes weaponized as a defense mechanism against emotional vulnerability. Boys describe using "hilarious" as a default response when confronted with something inappropriate, confusing, upsetting, or horrifying. This allows them to maintain distance from compassionate responses that might be interpreted as weakness. "Hilarious" offers protection from having to confront the ethical implications of sexist or misogynistic behavior, creating a buffer between actions and accountability. The masculine code ultimately blocks boys from developing empathy for women's experiences and hardens them against compassion. As psychologist Michael Thompson observes, silence in the face of cruelty or sexism becomes the pathway through which boys become men. The tragedy lies in how many boys recognize the toxicity of this system but feel powerless to challenge it without sacrificing their social standing and relationships—a dilemma that perpetuates harmful patterns despite individual misgivings.

Chapter 2: Digital Influences: Pornography's Impact on Sexual Expectations

Today's adolescents participate in an unprecedented experiment with pornography exposure. Unlike previous generations who might have glimpsed occasional explicit images in magazines, contemporary youth have unlimited access to streaming content through smartphones and high-speed internet. The launch of free streaming sites like Pornhub in 2007 fundamentally transformed how young people encounter sexual imagery, providing instant access to endless varieties of explicit content before they've had any real-life sexual experiences. This early and repeated exposure profoundly shapes young men's sexual imagination and expectations. Many boys learn masturbation entirely in tandem with pornography, creating neural pathways that yoke their cycle of desire, arousal, and release to these images. The content they consume typically reflects traditional gender dynamics shot from the male perspective—sex portrayed as something men do to rather than with women, with female pleasure presented as performance rather than authentic experience. This creates distorted expectations about both male and female sexuality that can be difficult to unlearn. Research indicates concerning correlations between regular pornography consumption and problematic attitudes. College-age male users report less satisfaction with their actual sex lives, their own sexual performance, and their female partners' bodies compared to non-users. They're more likely to view sex as purely physical rather than emotional and to regard women as objects of conquest rather than equal participants. Many young men interviewed expressed worry about how pornography had affected their ability to become aroused by real partners or to enjoy intimate experiences without mentally comparing them to the performative nature of pornographic content. The impact extends beyond sexual expectations to broader views on gender equality. While pornography may have a liberalizing effect on some attitudes (like support for same-sex marriage), male users demonstrate less support for affirmative action for women and less endorsement of gender equality in leadership positions. The continuous objectification and degradation of women in pornographic content appears to "spill over" into how young men perceive all women, affecting their judgments about female competence and intelligence even in non-sexual contexts. Pornography doesn't exist in isolation but reinforces messages boys receive from mainstream media, video games, advertising, and music. From childhood onward, boys consume media that continuously objectifies women, presents them as rewards for male achievement, and inaccurately represents female gratification. These scripts influence emotions and behavior even when viewers believe they don't, creating a foundation for how boys understand gender relationships long before they engage in intimate encounters. For some boys, pornography use becomes compulsive, leading them to explore increasingly extreme content in search of novelty and stimulation. Without guidance from parents or educators about healthy sexuality, pornography becomes their primary sex education—a troubling reality given its emphasis on performance over connection, pleasure over consent, and fantasy over the complex reality of human relationships.

Chapter 3: Between Conquest and Connection: Navigating Modern Hookup Culture

College hookup culture represents a significant inversion in traditional relationship development—physical connection has become the expected precursor to emotional intimacy rather than its product. This reversal creates a paradoxical experience for many young men who find themselves caught between the competitive, detached nature of casual encounters and their own desires for meaningful connection. The resulting tension shapes their sexual development in profound and often contradictory ways. The ritual begins with alcohol—not just as social lubricant but as an essential component that establishes the required "compulsory carelessness" necessary for hookups. Intoxication becomes both the reason for and the excuse for sexual encounters, creating a troubling dynamic where partners must be drunk enough to want sex but sober enough to express credible consent. This dependence on alcohol increases the risk of miscommunication and reduces inhibitions against coercive behavior, creating environments where sexual misconduct becomes more likely. For many young men, hookups align with conventional masculine values: conquest over connection, sex as status-seeking, partners as disposable. This mindset typically results in indifference toward female pleasure—studies show a significant "orgasm gap" between men and women in casual encounters. Yet this approach ultimately disadvantages boys as well, leaving them struggling with unexpected feelings of connection and vulnerability they've been conditioned to suppress. The social dynamics surrounding hookups create additional pressure. Young men described the anxiety of "the morning after"—the unspoken expectation that partners should be less friendly after a hookup than before, affirming its meaninglessness. This creates a predicament for the majority who secretly hope their hookups might develop into something more meaningful. The fear of appearing vulnerable or being rejected leads many to maintain a facade of indifference, even when they feel otherwise. Most young men interviewed expressed profound ambivalence about hookup culture, acknowledging that while it provided physical release and social status, it rarely delivered genuine satisfaction or joy. Many described feeling empty after encounters, questioning what they had gained beyond "a number." Some of the most sexually active young men identified seemingly simple acts of emotional intimacy—like holding hands—as more meaningful than casual sex, revealing the disconnect between cultural expectations and personal desires. Those who had experienced both hookups and relationships consistently described the latter as more fulfilling, not just emotionally but physically. In relationships, they felt more relaxed, more trusting, more free to be themselves. They spoke of their partners with admiration and respect, focusing on character, intellect, and personality rather than physical attributes. The care and kindness they avoided in hookups became central to their relationship experiences, enhancing both emotional and physical satisfaction in ways that challenge prevailing narratives about what young men truly want.

Chapter 4: Diverse Masculinities: Race, Sexuality and Gender Expression

LGBTQ+ youth navigate a complex terrain of masculinity that both challenges and sometimes reinforces traditional gender norms. Gay, bisexual, and transgender boys provide unique insights into masculine performance precisely because they must consciously negotiate its boundaries rather than unconsciously absorbing them. Their experiences reveal both the rigidity of gender expectations and the possibility of more authentic expressions of selfhood. Gay boys described the exhausting vigilance required to monitor their speech, mannerisms, and interests to avoid being labeled as "feminine." Many recounted practicing "masculine" behaviors—modifying how they walked, sat, gestured, and spoke—to evade detection and harassment. This hyperawareness of gender performance highlights how narrowly masculinity is defined and how strictly it is policed. Yet despite increased social acceptance of LGBTQ+ identities, gay boys still face the paradox of being accepted as "the gay friend" while their actual sexuality remains taboo among straight peers. Transgender boys offer particularly illuminating perspectives on masculinity, having experienced the world from multiple gender positions. Many described the relief of shedding the hypervisibility and objectification they experienced when presenting as female. One trans student noted how, after transition, he no longer experienced street harassment or the constant fear of bodily violation that had been his daily reality before. This stark contrast revealed the privilege of male embodiment—the ability to move through the world without constant awareness of one's physical vulnerability. Young men of color in predominantly white educational institutions face unique challenges in navigating masculinity. They experience a paradoxical position of being simultaneously hypervisible and invisible—constantly watched yet fundamentally unseen. Black male students described the exhausting vigilance required to manage their self-presentation in white spaces, carefully monitoring their speech, dress, and behavior to counter stereotypes. Asian American men face different but equally constraining stereotypes that question their masculinity, consistently rated as less physically attractive, less athletic, and less sexual than other men. The social dynamics of hookup culture become particularly fraught for men of color. Black men are often fetishized as hypersexual while simultaneously viewed as threatening. Several described maintaining heightened awareness at parties dominated by white students, knowing that crossing social boundaries could have more severe consequences for them than for white peers. As one student explained, "As a black man, it feels like a threat to my life in the most basic way to be intoxicated if I hook up." Both queer and racially diverse young men demonstrated remarkable resilience and insight in navigating these complex intersections of identity. Many developed more nuanced understandings of masculinity through their experiences of marginalization, learning to acknowledge vulnerability and demand more authentic connections. Their journeys suggest that questioning gender norms can lead to more fulfilling expressions of identity for all young men—a process that requires recognizing how masculinity is always mediated through race, sexuality, and other aspects of identity.

Chapter 5: Consent and Confusion: The Gap Between Theory and Practice

Young men today are navigating sexual ethics in a rapidly evolving landscape. The shift from "no means no" to affirmative consent ("yes means yes") represents a fundamental change in how sexual interactions are understood. While previous generations might have assumed anything was permissible until explicitly refused, current standards require active, conscious, and ongoing agreement at each stage of intimacy. This transition has created both clarity and confusion. Some young men have embraced affirmative consent as enhancing rather than diminishing sexual experiences. As one college student explained, "Affirmative consent is really hot. It's exciting to have a girl saying, 'Yes! I want you to do this.' To feel she's really into it." Others approach consent more defensively, focused primarily on avoiding trouble rather than ensuring mutual pleasure and comfort. Research reveals a troubling gap between how young men understand consent in theory and how they practice it. When interviewed, most could define affirmative consent and endorsed its principles. Yet when describing their actual sexual encounters, few had engaged in explicit verbal communication about boundaries or desires. When confronted with this contradiction, they tended to expand their definitions of consent rather than questioning their behavior, interpreting ambiguous signals as clear affirmation. Many young men struggle with accountability when they cross boundaries. The prevailing narrative that only "monsters" commit assault makes it difficult for them to acknowledge harmful behavior without seeing themselves as irredeemable. As one student observed, "Everyone thinks they're a good guy. They've all been told that by someone—by family or friends. So no one thinks they're a rapist except maybe in the worst situations." Parents and educators have largely failed to provide guidance on sexual ethics. A national survey found that the majority of boys had never had basic conversations with their parents about ensuring a partner's comfort, being a respectful sexual partner, or avoiding sex with someone too intoxicated to consent. Without explicit instruction, boys are left to piece together sexual ethics from media, pornography, and peers—sources that often reinforce problematic attitudes. The confusion extends to boys' understanding of their own victimization. Many described experiences where girls had ignored their refusal or taken advantage of their intoxication. These accounts challenge the assumption that boys are always willing sexual participants and highlight how traditional masculinity denies men's vulnerability. As one researcher noted, "If guys are supposed to deny their own violation, how can they feel compassion for a girl's? If they can't say no, how are they supposed to hear it?" This insight reveals how rigid gender expectations ultimately harm everyone by undermining the foundations of mutual respect and ethical sexual engagement.

Chapter 6: Beyond Stereotypes: Challenging Myths About Male Sexuality

The persistent myth that men are perpetually interested in sex regardless of circumstances creates harmful expectations for young men. This stereotype—that guys are driven solely by hormones, incapable of emotional connection, and always ready for sexual activity—constrains boys' ability to make authentic choices about intimacy and undermines their capacity for meaningful relationships. Research contradicts these assumptions. Studies comparing Dutch and American families found that while boys in both countries overwhelmingly wanted to combine love with physical intimacy, only the Dutch saw this as normal. American boys each thought their desire for emotional connection was a personal quirk, unusual among peers. Large-scale surveys have found that high school boys are as emotionally invested in their relationships as girls, though they may have less confidence in navigating them due to limited practice or support. The "all guys want it" myth creates particular harm when boys experience unwanted sexual attention or assault. Many young men described situations where they felt pressured or coerced into sexual activity, often while intoxicated. When they expressed discomfort or tried to refuse, they were met with disbelief or mockery—"All guys want it" becoming a weapon used against them. This dynamic makes it difficult for boys to establish boundaries or process violations when they occur. The stereotype also creates performance anxiety that diminishes sexual pleasure. Boys described worrying about maintaining erections, lasting long enough, and satisfying partners—concerns that transformed potentially enjoyable experiences into stress-inducing tests of their masculinity. The focus on performance rather than connection prevented many from being present during intimate encounters or communicating honestly about their desires and limits. For boys in relationships, the pressure to conform to stereotypes about male sexuality created additional complications. Some described being pushed by peers or even parents to end relationships in order to have more casual encounters. One college student shared that his father told him, "I'm not paying fifty grand a year for you not to get laid," despite the young man's satisfaction with his long-term girlfriend. These external pressures undermine boys' ability to make choices aligned with their own values and desires. The most emotionally healthy young men interviewed were those who had found ways to resist these stereotypes and develop more authentic approaches to intimacy. They described learning to acknowledge vulnerability, communicate openly with partners, and prioritize connection over conquest. As one student reflected after moving from hookups to a relationship, "Looking back, I did have that syndrome. I've realized that consent is the bare minimum that should be expected when you're with someone. People think once they've been granted consent for sex that all bets are off in terms of what you do to someone emotionally, how you treat them. And that's not true."

Chapter 7: Pathways to Change: Restorative Justice and Ethical Development

Traditional approaches to campus sexual misconduct often leave both survivors and perpetrators dissatisfied. Formal disciplinary proceedings can retraumatize survivors while creating defensiveness among those responsible, missing opportunities for genuine accountability and growth. Restorative justice offers an alternative approach that focuses on repairing harm, promoting accountability, and transforming underlying attitudes and behaviors. Unlike conventional disciplinary processes where disinterested panels determine guilt and punishment, restorative justice brings together those harmed and those responsible in a collaborative process. Trained facilitators guide participants through describing the incident, its impact, the needs created, and the obligations that result. This approach centers the experience of those harmed while creating space for perpetrators to take meaningful responsibility rather than simply defending themselves against accusations. The transformative potential of restorative justice lies in its ability to humanize both parties while maintaining clear moral boundaries. Rather than being labeled a "monster" or permanently cast out, those who have caused harm are held accountable as people who have done serious damage but who can also learn, grow, and contribute to preventing future harm. This approach avoids the defensive posture that often emerges in adversarial proceedings, where accused students focus on protecting themselves rather than understanding the impact of their actions. For survivors, the process provides validation and agency that might be missing in traditional disciplinary approaches. Rather than having decisions made for them by administrators, they actively participate in determining what accountability looks like. The process acknowledges the complexity of their experience and needs, moving beyond binary questions of guilt or innocence to address the full impact of misconduct on their lives. The restorative approach also creates opportunities for broader community impact. As part of accountability processes, those who have caused harm often share their stories publicly, write about consent for campus publications, and work to educate other men about sexual misconduct. This extends the impact beyond individual healing to address the cultural factors that enable sexual assault, potentially preventing future harm to others. Parents play a crucial role in developing boys' ethical understanding of sexuality. Moving beyond "the talk" to ongoing conversations is essential. Parents need to have regular, developmentally appropriate discussions that evolve as children mature, addressing what it means to be a caring, respectful partner. Fathers particularly influence sons' gender attitudes, with research showing they often serve as "chiefs of the gender police." By modeling emotional expressiveness and challenging toxic masculinity, fathers can help boys develop healthier approaches to manhood. Ultimately, transforming masculine sexual ethics requires action at multiple levels—from individual parenting choices to educational approaches to broader cultural narratives. By providing accurate information, modeling respectful relationships, challenging harmful cultural messages, and creating space for ongoing dialogue, we can help young men develop into adults who approach sexuality with integrity, empathy, and genuine respect for themselves and their partners.

Summary

The crisis in masculine development reveals both profound challenges and remarkable opportunities for social transformation. Traditional masculinity—characterized by emotional suppression, sexual conquest, and dominance—exacts a devastating toll not only on women but on boys and men themselves, who find their full humanity constrained by rigid gender expectations. The evidence demonstrates how these limitations manifest across multiple domains: emotional development, sexual relationships, digital influences, and ethical decision-making. Yet within this crisis lies the potential for reimagining masculinity itself. What emerges most clearly is the need for a fundamental reconceptualization of what it means to be a man in contemporary society. Rather than viewing manhood as defined by stoicism, sexual achievement, and power over others, we must cultivate visions of masculinity centered on emotional intelligence, mutual respect, and ethical engagement. This transformation requires action at multiple levels—from individual parenting choices to educational approaches to broader cultural narratives. The stakes could not be higher, as these efforts will shape not only the wellbeing of boys themselves but also their capacity to engage in healthy, respectful relationships throughout their lives. For those committed to creating a more equitable and compassionate society, there is perhaps no more important work than helping boys develop into men capable of genuine connection, vulnerability, and care for others.

About Author

Loading...

Peggy Orenstein

Peggy Orenstein is a best-selling author and a contributing writer for The New York Times Magazine. Orenstein has also written for such publications as The Los Angeles Times, USA Today, Vogue, Elle, Discover, More, Mother Jones, Salon, O: The Oprah Magazine, and The New Yorker, and has contributed commentaries to NPR’s All Things Considered. Her articles have been anthologized multiple times, including in The Best American Science Writing. She has been a keynote speaker at numerous colleges and conferences and has been featured on, among other programs, "Nightline," "Good Morning America," "Today," NPR’s "Fresh Air" and Morning Edition, and CBC’s "As It Happens."Orenstein was recognized for her “Outstanding Coverage of Family Diversity,” by the Council on Contemporary Families and received a “Books For A Better Life Award” for Waiting for Daisy. Her work has also been honored by the Commonwealth Club of California, the National Women’s Political Caucus of California, and Planned Parenthood Federation of America. Additionally, she has been awarded fellowships from the United States-Japan Foundation and the Asian Cultural Council.Born in Minneapolis, Minnesota, Orenstein is a graduate of Oberlin College and lives in the San Francisco Bay Area with her husband and daughter.

Read more