Bringing Out the Best in People

Bringing Out the Best in People Plot Summary

Introduction

How do organizations get the best out of their people? This question has challenged leaders for generations, often leading to frustrating cycles of management fads and short-lived initiatives. While many assume that people naturally resist change or lack motivation, the science of behavior reveals a different truth: people respond predictably to the consequences they experience in their environment. The behavioral science approach to performance management offers a systematic, evidence-based framework for understanding and influencing human behavior in the workplace. Rather than focusing on vague concepts like attitude or motivation, this approach examines the tangible interactions between behavior and its consequences. By understanding how consequences shape behavior, leaders can design environments that naturally bring out discretionary effort—that extra level of performance people could give if they wanted to, but aren't required to. The principles revealed through decades of behavioral research demonstrate that positive reinforcement, properly applied, isn't just a "nice" approach—it's the most effective way to achieve sustainable performance improvement and maximize human potential in any organization.

Chapter 1: Understanding the Four Behavioral Consequences

Behavioral consequences are the engine that drives human performance. When we understand how consequences affect behavior, we gain tremendous leverage in creating environments that bring out the best in people. Every behavior produces a consequence, and those consequences either increase or decrease the likelihood that the behavior will be repeated in the future. There are precisely four types of behavioral consequences that influence performance. Two of these consequences increase behavior: positive reinforcement (receiving something desired) and negative reinforcement (escaping or avoiding something undesired). The other two consequences decrease behavior: punishment (receiving something undesired) and penalty (losing something valued). Each consequence produces distinctly different effects on performance. Positive reinforcement generates discretionary effort—performance beyond what is minimally required. Negative reinforcement, by contrast, produces just enough behavior to escape or avoid an unpleasant outcome, often characterized as "doing just enough to get by." The science reveals that each consequence has a different impact on both the quantity and quality of performance. Positive reinforcement accelerates performance and creates enthusiasm, while negative reinforcement limits performance to the minimum required. Punishment and penalty, while sometimes necessary to stop harmful behaviors, don't tell performers what they should do instead. They're incomplete tools on their own. These dynamics explain why some workplaces thrive with engaged employees while others struggle with compliance-driven mediocrity. Understanding the four consequences requires recognizing that their definitions are based on their effect, not intention. What management intends as positive reinforcement might actually function as punishment if performance decreases afterward. Similarly, what's intended as constructive criticism might inadvertently reinforce the wrong behavior if it provides attention that the performer values. The key insight is that consequences are defined by how they affect behavior, not by how we label them. In daily workplace interactions, all four consequences occur naturally. When an employee completes a report and receives appreciation, that's positive reinforcement. When someone works late to avoid criticism from their boss, that's negative reinforcement. The organization that understands how to strategically arrange these consequences will dramatically outperform those that leave them to chance. Mastering this science gives leaders precise tools to shape culture, improve performance, and create environments where people naturally give their best.

Chapter 2: The Power of Positive Reinforcement

Positive reinforcement occurs when a behavior produces a favorable consequence that increases the likelihood of that behavior recurring. Unlike common misconceptions that reduce it to simplistic "atta-boys" or empty praise, true positive reinforcement is a precise scientific principle with transformative power when properly applied. It is the only consequence that reliably produces discretionary effort—that extra level of performance people could give but aren't required to. The power of positive reinforcement lies in how it accelerates behavior and creates enthusiasm for work. Consider the difference between two customer service representatives: one who handles calls efficiently because they're afraid of losing their job (negative reinforcement), versus one who genuinely engages with customers because their attentiveness is recognized and appreciated (positive reinforcement). The former does just enough to meet minimum standards, while the latter consistently goes beyond requirements, creating exceptional customer experiences. Positive reinforcement can be either natural or created. Natural reinforcement occurs automatically when the behavior itself produces rewarding results—like the satisfaction of solving a challenging problem. Created reinforcement must be added by someone else, like praise from a supervisor or recognition from peers. Both types can be powerful, but the most effective workplace environments incorporate both, ensuring that performers receive immediate positive consequences for valuable behaviors. The science reveals that what functions as positive reinforcement varies tremendously between individuals. What motivates one person may be neutral or even punishing to another. Some people enjoy public recognition while others find it embarrassing. Some value tangible rewards while others prefer new opportunities or autonomy. This individuality explains why one-size-fits-all motivation programs often fail. Effective leaders take time to discover what each person finds reinforcing through observation, experimentation, and thoughtful inquiry. Research consistently demonstrates that positive reinforcement produces superior results compared to other consequences. Organizations that systematically apply positive reinforcement see dramatic improvements in productivity, quality, safety, and innovation. For example, when Blue Cross Blue Shield implemented positive reinforcement systems in their claims processing department, performance increased by nearly 300%. The science shows unequivocally that positive reinforcement isn't just a "nice" approach—it's the most effective way to achieve sustainable performance improvement in any organization.

Chapter 3: Pinpointing Behaviors That Matter

Pinpointing is the foundational skill of effective performance management—the process of precisely defining the results you want and the specific behaviors needed to achieve them. Without clear pinpoints, attempts to improve performance become vague and ineffective, like trying to hit a target you can't see. Pinpointing transforms abstract goals like "improve customer service" into concrete, observable behaviors like "answer calls within three rings" and "acknowledge customer concerns before offering solutions." The most common mistake in performance improvement is focusing exclusively on results while ignoring the behaviors that produce them. A manager might demand better quality numbers without specifying what actions will create those improvements. This approach leaves performers guessing about what they should actually do differently. Effective pinpointing always addresses both results (what should be accomplished) and behaviors (how it should be accomplished). This dual focus ensures that not only are the right outcomes achieved, but they're achieved through appropriate methods. Scientifically valid pinpoints must meet three essential criteria: observability, measurability, and reliability. Observability means the behavior can be seen or heard—it's not an internal state like "having a good attitude" but rather tangible actions like "greets customers by name." Measurability means the behavior can be counted or timed—how often it occurs or how long it takes. Reliability means different observers would agree on whether the behavior occurred. These criteria transform vague expectations into clear performance standards. A critical distinction in pinpointing is identifying active behaviors rather than inactive states. The "dead man's test" helps clarify this distinction: if a dead person could do it, it's not a behavior. "Having no accidents" isn't a behavior because a dead person would never have accidents. Instead, proper pinpoints specify what people should actively do, such as "wear protective equipment" or "follow lockout procedures." This shift from focusing on what not to do to what to do creates clear direction for improvement. When properly implemented, pinpointing eliminates confusion and dramatically accelerates performance improvement. For example, a manufacturing plant struggling with quality issues transformed their performance by shifting from vague instructions to "be more careful" to specific behaviors like "check measurements at three points during assembly" and "calibrate gauges at the start of each shift." The clarity provided by precise pinpoints allowed performers to focus their efforts effectively, while giving supervisors concrete behaviors to reinforce. This behavioral precision is what separates consistently high-performing organizations from those with unpredictable results.

Chapter 4: Effective Measurement and Feedback Systems

Measurement forms the backbone of any successful performance improvement system, but its purpose is widely misunderstood. The saying "what gets measured gets done" is only half true—measurement alone changes nothing. The value of measurement lies in how it creates opportunities for reinforcement and clarifies progress toward goals. Effective measurement systems don't exist to find fault but to enable improvement by showing performers exactly where they stand and recognizing their progress. Creating measurement systems that motivate rather than intimidate requires a fundamental shift in approach. Traditional measurement often functions as an antecedent for punishment—performers learn that being measured means being criticized for falling short. This creates resistance and avoidance. By contrast, when measurement becomes an antecedent for positive reinforcement, people actively seek measurement because it provides opportunities to receive recognition for improvement. Organizations where people eagerly track their own performance have successfully paired measurement with positive consequences. The most effective measurement approaches prioritize raw data over percentages or ratios. Raw counts provide more detailed information about what's actually happening and reveal patterns that percentages might obscure. For instance, measuring the actual number of customer complaints rather than just the percentage change allows you to see whether problems are truly decreasing or if the denominator has simply changed. When measurement focuses on helping performers see their own progress, it becomes a powerful tool for improvement rather than a dreaded evaluation. Feedback, the information derived from measurement, must be delivered in ways that facilitate improvement. Graphical feedback is particularly effective because it visually displays performance trends over time, showing both where performance has been and where it's heading. Frequent feedback—daily or weekly rather than monthly or quarterly—creates many more opportunities for reinforcement and allows for quick course corrections. Private individual feedback combined with public group feedback creates a balance that respects personal dignity while fostering team accountability. The most sophisticated feedback systems put control directly in the performers' hands. When employees can track their own performance, they gain autonomy and immediate feedback without waiting for supervisors. For example, a customer service team that tracks their own resolution rates and customer satisfaction scores can immediately see the effects of new approaches they try. This performer-controlled feedback, combined with regular coaching conversations, creates a continuous improvement cycle that builds both skills and motivation. The combination of precise measurement and effective feedback forms the foundation upon which positive reinforcement can systematically improve performance.

Chapter 5: Problem-Solving with the Performance Management Model

The Performance Management Model provides a systematic approach to solving any behavioral performance problem. Unlike traditional problem-solving methods that jump directly to solutions based on assumptions, this model follows a precise sequence: Pinpoint, Measure, Feedback, Reinforce, and Evaluate. Each step builds on the previous one, creating a scientific approach that produces consistent, predictable improvements in performance. The process begins with pinpointing—clearly defining both the results you want and the specific behaviors needed to achieve them. Without this clarity, attempts at improvement lack direction. Once behaviors are pinpointed, measurement establishes a baseline of current performance and tracks progress over time. This step answers the question, "How often is the desired behavior currently occurring?" Measurement creates visibility into performance patterns that might otherwise remain hidden. With measurement in place, feedback connects performers to their performance data, showing them exactly where they stand relative to goals. Effective feedback is frequent, specific, and visual—often displayed in graphs that reveal performance trends. The reinforcement step is where behavior change truly occurs, as improvements receive positive consequences that strengthen the desired performance. This systematic reinforcement of improvement, not just achievement of final goals, accelerates progress dramatically. The final step—evaluation—distinguishes this model from typical management approaches. Evaluation means analyzing whether the intervention actually produced the desired results. Using experimental designs like multiple baseline measurements, managers can determine whether changes in performance directly resulted from their intervention rather than from other factors. This scientific rigor ensures that resources are invested in approaches that genuinely work rather than those that merely seem to work. The power of this model is evident in its application across diverse settings. A manufacturing plant struggling with quality issues used the model to pinpoint specific inspection behaviors, measure their frequency, provide daily feedback through simple graphs, reinforce improvements, and evaluate the results. Within weeks, defect rates dropped by 70%. Similarly, a sales organization applied the model to customer relationship behaviors rather than just focusing on sales outcomes, resulting in both improved customer retention and higher sales volumes. The model's versatility comes from its foundation in behavioral science—it addresses the universal principles of human behavior that apply across all types of work and organizations.

Chapter 6: Creating Engagement Through Reinforcement

Employee engagement—the willingness to give discretionary effort—remains one of the most persistent challenges in modern organizations. Despite decades of initiatives, surveys consistently show that less than one-third of employees report being fully engaged in their work. This widespread disengagement represents an enormous untapped potential for performance improvement. The behavioral science approach reveals that engagement isn't about employees' attitudes or personalities—it's about the consequences they experience in the workplace. The traditional approach to engagement focuses on elaborate programs, values statements, and employee surveys. These methods typically produce limited results because they fail to address the fundamental behavioral principle: people do what they do because of what happens to them when they do it. When employees experience positive consequences for going above and beyond, they continue giving discretionary effort. When extra effort goes unnoticed or unrewarded, it gradually disappears through extinction. This explains why engagement levels remain stubbornly low despite significant investment in engagement programs. Creating truly engaged workplaces requires addressing engagement at the behavioral level rather than the attitudinal level. This means systematically arranging consequences so that discretionary effort reliably produces positive outcomes for employees. Rather than focusing on how employees feel about their work, this approach focuses on what happens when they demonstrate engaged behaviors. The critical insight is that engagement flows upward from frontline supervisors to employees, not downward from executive pronouncements or corporate programs. Research consistently demonstrates that immediate social reinforcement from direct supervisors has far greater impact on engagement than corporate programs or distant rewards. When supervisors notice and positively acknowledge employees' contributions, seek their input on decisions, and help them succeed, engagement naturally follows. This explains why engagement levels vary dramatically between departments within the same company—different supervisors create different reinforcement environments despite operating under the same corporate policies. Perhaps most importantly, creating engagement through reinforcement means recognizing that it's not about employees—it's about the environment leaders create. As one behavioral scientist noted, "The measure of a leader is the behavior of the followers." Low engagement is a reflection of management practices, not employee deficiencies. When leaders systematically reinforce the behaviors that constitute engagement—like taking initiative, suggesting improvements, helping colleagues, or exceeding expectations—these behaviors increase and become part of the culture. Engagement isn't something employees possess or lack; it's something that emerges when the work environment consistently reinforces discretionary effort.

Chapter 7: Leadership's Role in Performance Management

Leadership in a behaviorally-driven organization differs dramatically from traditional management approaches. While conventional leadership focuses on charisma, vision, and direction-setting, behavioral leadership emphasizes creating environments where people naturally perform at their best. This distinction explains why many charismatic leaders fail to produce sustainable results—they focus on inspiring rather than reinforcing. The science reveals that lasting performance improvement comes from leaders who understand and systematically apply the principles of behavioral science. The primary responsibility of behavioral leaders is designing systems and structures that naturally reinforce desired behaviors. This means examining every aspect of the organization—from physical layout to communication patterns to reward systems—and asking, "What behaviors do our current systems reinforce?" Often, leaders discover that their systems inadvertently reinforce behaviors contrary to their stated values. For example, many organizations claim to value teamwork while their compensation systems create internal competition. Effective leaders ensure alignment between what the organization says it values and what it actually reinforces. One of the most powerful leadership behaviors is what behavioral scientists call "differential reinforcement"—noticing and reinforcing small improvements in the right direction rather than waiting for perfect performance. This shaping process accelerates learning and builds confidence far more effectively than traditional approaches that only recognize major achievements. Leaders who master this skill can develop high performers from average beginners by systematically reinforcing successive approximations toward excellence. Measurement takes on new meaning in behavioral leadership. Rather than using measurement primarily for evaluation and control, behavioral leaders use it to create opportunities for positive reinforcement. They ensure that measurement systems track behaviors within performers' control, provide frequent feedback, and connect improvement to meaningful consequences. When leaders model this approach to measurement, it cascades through the organization, transforming how people view and use performance data. Perhaps most importantly, behavioral leaders understand Herrnstein's matching law—the principle that people allocate their behavior in proportion to the reinforcement available for different activities. This insight helps leaders understand why new initiatives often fail (insufficient reinforcement compared to established practices) and how to successfully implement change (by systematically reinforcing new behaviors until they become self-sustaining). By understanding and applying these scientific principles, leaders create organizations where exceptional performance becomes the norm rather than the exception. This science-based approach to leadership produces results that inspirational speeches and corporate programs alone never could.

Summary

The science of positive reinforcement reveals a fundamental truth that transforms our understanding of human performance: behavior is governed by its consequences, not by inherent traits, attitudes, or intentions. This principle provides unprecedented leverage for improving performance in any setting. By precisely pinpointing desired behaviors, measuring them accurately, providing meaningful feedback, and systematically reinforcing improvement, leaders can create environments where people naturally contribute their discretionary effort rather than merely complying with minimum requirements. The most powerful insight from this science is that performance problems typically reflect environmental deficiencies rather than personal ones. When people underperform, the solution lies not in trying to "fix" them through motivation or discipline, but in redesigning the consequences they experience. Organizations that master this approach discover that extraordinary performance isn't about finding extraordinary people—it's about creating environments that bring out the extraordinary potential in ordinary people. This science-based approach to performance management offers a sustainable path to excellence that transcends the temporary effects of management fads and motivational programs.

About Author

Loading...

Aubrey C. Daniels

Read more