Company of One

Company of One Plot Summary

Introduction

The business world has long been dominated by a singular message: growth is good, and more growth is better. But what if this foundational assumption is fundamentally flawed? What if endless expansion actually undermines business success rather than enables it? This is the contrarian view that challenges entrepreneurs to reconsider their reflexive pursuit of scale. At its core, the "company of one" philosophy represents a paradigm shift in business thinking. Rather than focusing on employee headcount, revenue targets, or market domination, it prioritizes qualities like resilience, autonomy, nimbleness, and simplicity. The framework asks critical questions about when growth serves your ultimate goals and when it becomes a liability. It explores how intentionally small businesses can achieve remarkable profitability while maintaining quality of life, customer relationships, and operational efficiency. This isn't anti-capitalism—it's a more refined version that questions whether traditional metrics of success actually lead to sustainable, meaningful outcomes.

Chapter 1: The Company of One Philosophy: Resilience Over Scale

The company of one philosophy represents a radical departure from conventional business wisdom. Rather than pursuing endless growth, this approach focuses on building an enterprise that questions growth at every turn, choosing to scale up only when it genuinely improves the business—not simply for growth's sake. It's about creating an organization optimized for resilience rather than sheer size, enabling it to weather economic storms and market shifts with minimal disruption. At its foundation, a company of one possesses four key traits. Resilience allows it to recover quickly from difficulties, adapting to changing markets rather than being destroyed by them. Autonomy gives it the freedom to make decisions without bureaucratic entanglements, moving swiftly when opportunities arise. Speed enables rapid pivoting and iteration without the burden of excessive infrastructure. And simplicity—perhaps most crucial—keeps operations streamlined, focusing only on what truly matters rather than expanding in every possible direction. This approach isn't limited to solo entrepreneurs, though they embody it most purely. Even within larger organizations, individuals or teams can adopt company of one principles, functioning as autonomous units that deliver exceptional value without requiring constant growth in headcount or resources. These intrapreneurs, as they're sometimes called, can drive innovation while maintaining the nimbleness that larger departments often lack. Consider Tom Fishburne, who left his vice president position at a major consumer foods company to draw cartoons. Rather than building a large studio with dozens of employees, he maintained a lean operation with just himself and his wife, occasionally hiring freelancers for specific projects. This approach allowed him to work directly with clients, maintain creative control, and generate two to three times his previous corporate income—all while spending afternoons drawing with his daughters in their backyard studio. The philosophy manifests differently across various contexts but always returns to the central question: "Will this growth actually make my business better, or just bigger?" By challenging growth assumptions, companies of one build remarkable resilience, enabling them not just to survive but thrive in circumstances that might cripple growth-dependent competitors. This isn't about rejecting success—it's about redefining it in terms of sustainability, autonomy, and purpose rather than endless expansion.

Chapter 2: Why Smaller Can Be Better: Growth Isn't Always Good

The notion that business growth represents an unquestionable good deserves scrutiny. Research increasingly suggests otherwise. A study by the Startup Genome Project analyzing over 3,200 high-growth tech startups found that 74% failed not because of competition or poor business plans, but because they scaled too quickly. Similarly, a Kauffman Foundation and Inc. magazine follow-up study discovered that among the 5,000 fastest-growing companies, more than two-thirds were out of business, had undergone massive layoffs, or had been sold below market value within five to eight years. Growth often introduces layers of complexity that undermine the very qualities that made a business successful initially. When organizations grow rapidly, they typically add infrastructure, employees, and processes at an unsustainable rate. This expansion creates what entrepreneur Danielle LaPorte calls "the Beast"—a system that demands constant feeding through ever-increasing revenue, which then requires more growth to sustain, creating a dangerous cycle. Companies caught in this spiral find themselves serving the growth machine rather than their customers or core purpose. The structure of a company of one offers an alternative paradigm. Rather than measuring success by expansion, it focuses on improvement—becoming better rather than bigger. Sean D'Souza of Psychotactics exemplifies this approach, deliberately capping his annual profit at $500,000. This isn't because he couldn't earn more, but because he's calculated exactly what he needs for an ideal life—including taking three-month vacations with his wife and spending time mentoring his nieces. Beyond this point, additional growth would detract from rather than enhance his quality of life. This perspective extends beyond solo operations to larger companies as well. Ricardo Semler, CEO of Semco Partners (a $160 million business), determines the optimal size at which each company he manages can maintain worldwide competitive advantages, then stops growth to focus on improvement. Buffer, a social media scheduling tool with over 70 employees, has explicitly rejected the typical startup hypergrowth model after painful lessons about hiring based on projected rather than actual revenue. What makes the company of one approach revolutionary is how it reframes the fundamental question. Instead of asking "How can we grow bigger?" it asks "How can we become better at what we do?" This shift unlocks possibilities for sustainable profitability without the constant pressure to scale. It recognizes that when a business turns a good profit at its current size, growth becomes a choice rather than a requirement—and sometimes the wisest choice is to remain small and focus on excellence.

Chapter 3: Building Trust Through Service: One Customer at a Time

The company of one approach radically reimagines customer relationships. Rather than viewing customers as interchangeable units to be acquired in volume, it treats each one as uniquely valuable—worthy of exceptional, personalized attention. This philosophy transforms customer service from a cost center to be minimized into a central competitive advantage and driver of sustainable growth. Research consistently demonstrates the financial wisdom of this approach. The White House Office of Consumer Affairs found loyal customers are worth up to ten times their first purchase value. Acquiring new customers costs five to seven times more than retaining existing ones. Yet paradoxically, companies typically invest far more in acquisition than retention. Companies of one recognize this disconnect and reverse it, focusing intensely on delighting current customers before chasing new ones. The mechanics of this approach involve several interconnected elements. First is genuine empathy—truly understanding customer needs rather than merely processing transactions. This requires active listening and responsiveness that becomes increasingly difficult at scale. Second is ownership of problems—when issues inevitably arise, companies of one take full responsibility rather than deflecting blame, even when technically not at fault. Third is consistent follow-through on commitments, treating every promise as a binding contract. Real-world examples abound. CDBaby, a service helping independent musicians sell their music online, ensures every customer support call is answered by a real person within two rings between 7:00 AM and 10:00 PM—no voicemail, no complex routing systems. The Trader Joe's employee who arranged free grocery delivery for an elderly man snowed in during a holiday, despite delivery not being an official service. The HighRise support team who records personalized welcome videos for each new customer, addressing them by name and offering direct assistance. These actions aren't merely good citizenship—they're smart business. Exceptional service creates reciprocity, turning customers into brand evangelists who drive referrals. It reduces expensive support escalations and costly churn. Most importantly, it builds the genuine trust that underpins all sustainable commercial relationships. While large corporations might view such service as "unscalable," companies of one recognize this apparent limitation as their greatest strength—the personal touch that giant competitors simply cannot match.

Chapter 4: Teaching as Marketing: Share Your Knowledge Freely

A revolutionary marketing approach for companies of one involves generously sharing expertise rather than hoarding it. This counter-intuitive strategy—teaching everything you know—builds unparalleled trust, establishes authority, and cultivates customer relationships far more effectively than traditional promotional methods. The teaching-as-marketing paradigm works through several mechanisms. First, it positions you as a domain expert, demonstrating competence rather than merely claiming it. When you consistently educate an audience about your field, they naturally see you as an authority. Second, it allows potential customers to understand the benefits of your offerings without overtly selling to them. By showing why and how your solution works, you help them reach their own conclusions about its value. Third, it educates new customers on maximizing results from your product or service, increasing satisfaction and retention. This approach fundamentally rejects the traditional fear that educating customers diminishes their need for your services. Research from MIT's Sloan School of Business confirms the opposite: the more clients understand the pros and cons of products, the more they trust providers and develop loyalty. Brian Clark exemplifies this principle with his journey from attorney to founder of CopyBlogger (now RainMaker Digital). Rather than guarding his content marketing knowledge, he shared everything freely through articles and resources. This "outsharing" built an audience that eventually generated over $12 million in annual revenue from 200,000+ customers. The strategic implementation varies across industries. Casper, the mattress company, created publications like "Van Winkles" and "Pillow Talk" focusing on sleep science rather than product promotion. Basecamp hosts workshops sharing their internal practices, charging $1,000 per attendee while simultaneously building their reputation. Jessica Abel, chair of illustration at Pennsylvania Academy of Fine Arts, has taught comic creation since the 1990s, finding that teaching strengthens rather than weakens her market position. The psychology behind this approach taps into fundamental human learning behaviors. Neuroscientist Greg Berns found that our decision-making centers partially deactivate when receiving advice from recognized experts. By becoming this trusted source through education, you bypass natural skepticism and resistance. This isn't manipulation but mutual benefit—you provide genuine value through knowledge while establishing the relationship foundation necessary for commerce. In today's information-rich environment, education has become the new marketing, creating connection through service before a single dollar changes hands.

Chapter 5: Scalable Systems Without Scaling Your Business

The company of one approach ingeniously separates growth in reach and revenue from growth in organizational size and complexity. Through carefully designed systems, entrepreneurs can serve more customers and generate higher profits without proportionally increasing headcount, infrastructure, or expenses. Scalable systems function by creating leverage points throughout the business. In production, this might mean strategic outsourcing or manufacturing partnerships that handle volume fluctuations without requiring internal expansion. In marketing and customer communication, it typically involves one-to-many channels like email newsletters, which require the same effort whether sent to 50 or 50,000 recipients. For customer education and onboarding, it means creating automated sequences that deliver personalized information precisely when needed, reducing support requests while improving satisfaction. The practical implementation varies by business type but follows consistent principles. Marshall Haas and Jon Wheatley of Need/Want (a physical product company selling everything from bedding to iPhone cases) generate nearly $10 million in revenue with fewer than ten employees. They accomplish this by using pre-packaged e-commerce software, outsourcing manufacturing and fulfillment, and focusing marketing efforts entirely on infinitely scalable online channels. Similarly, James Clear maintains a 400,000-subscriber mailing list with just one assistant by following two rules: his products must require minimal ongoing management, and he charges one-time fees rather than creating recurring service obligations. However, not all systems should be scaled. Collaboration tools that promise constant connectivity often create productivity-killing "asyncronish" communication—neither real-time nor truly asynchronous. Companies like Basecamp and Buffer actually scale down availability expectations, encouraging employees to disconnect from collaboration tools for focused work periods. This selective approach to scaling recognizes that always-on messaging can transform into all-day meetings without clear agendas or outcomes. The key insight is that thoughtful systems design enables growth where it matters—in impact and profit—while minimizing the corresponding growth in organizational burden. This doesn't mean eliminating the human element. Indeed, strategic "unscalability" in certain customer touchpoints (like personalized welcome videos) can become a competitive advantage. The goal isn't to automate everything, but to automate the right things, creating space for human attention where it adds the most value. This balanced approach allows companies of one to maintain the agility and personal connection of small operations while achieving the reach traditionally associated with much larger enterprises.

Chapter 6: Starting Small and Staying Profitable: Minimum Viable Profit

The minimum viable profit (MVPr) concept represents a fundamental reorientation in business thinking. Rather than focusing on potential growth or future value, it prioritizes reaching profitability as quickly as possible, with the smallest possible investment and operational footprint. This approach creates sustainability from day one rather than postponing it to some hypothetical future scale. The MVPr framework rests on the premise that achieving actual profit—even modest profit—provides the foundation for all future business decisions. Unlike growth-obsessed startups that often operate at substantial losses while chasing scale, companies of one focus on generating real revenue that exceeds expenses from the earliest possible moment. This isn't about limiting ambition but about building from a position of strength rather than precarity. Implementing the MVPr approach involves several practical strategies. First is radical simplification—launching with only core features or services that directly solve customer problems, then iterating based on market feedback. Jeff Sheldon's Ugmonk clothing line began with just four T-shirt designs and a $2,000 loan, becoming profitable almost instantly after the first production run sold out. Second is maintaining extremely low overhead costs, often by leveraging existing technology platforms rather than building custom solutions. Dan Norris emphasizes that "you don't learn anything until you launch"—every minute spent on prolonged development is a minute not generating revenue or gathering customer insights. This philosophy extends to funding strategies as well. While venture capital dominates startup conversations, research from the Kauffman Foundation shows that nearly 86% of long-term successful companies never took VC money. Companies of one typically self-fund or use creative alternatives like crowdfunding that don't sacrifice control. Katherine Krug's BetterBack raised over $3 million through crowdfunding campaigns, allowing her to maintain complete autonomy over her company's direction and values. The MVPr approach creates a virtuous cycle. By focusing on immediate profitability, companies develop discipline in resource allocation and customer focus. This discipline creates resilience against market fluctuations and freedom from investor pressure. Most importantly, it shifts the fundamental question from "How quickly can we grow?" to "How can we create sustainable value now?" This seemingly modest reframing produces remarkably different business trajectories—ones characterized by longevity, stability, and founder satisfaction rather than the boom-or-bust cycles typical of growth-fixated ventures.

Chapter 7: Relationships as Currency: Building Social Capital

The company of one philosophy recognizes relationships as perhaps its most valuable form of capital. While traditional businesses might prioritize financial or physical assets, companies of one understand that their network of genuine connections constitutes an irreplaceable currency that drives sustainable success. Social capital functions as a relationship bank account—you can only withdraw what you've deposited. This begins with shifting from transactional thinking to relationship cultivation. Chris Brogan, CEO of Owner Media Group, builds his business not through aggressive selling but by consistently providing value before requesting anything in return. He regularly connects people who might benefit from knowing each other, shares others' work without being asked, and focuses on teaching rather than selling. This approach creates goodwill that eventually translates into commercial opportunities when he does offer products or services. The mechanics of social capital accumulation involve several interconnected practices. First is consistent value creation—regularly sharing expertise, insights, or assistance without immediate expectation of return. Buffer, a social media management company, commits to providing free, high-quality content on their blog, attracting over 700,000 monthly readers and driving customer acquisition. Second is authentic engagement—connecting as genuine humans rather than promotional entities. Chris Guillebeau personally emailed his first 10,000 newsletter subscribers to thank them for signing up, an "unscalable" gesture that fostered remarkable loyalty. Translating social capital into business results requires strategic balance. Sam Milbrath of HootSuite suggests dividing audience interactions into thirds: one-third business content, one-third sharing others' content, and one-third personal interactions. This approach maintains relationship authenticity while still serving business objectives. Dr. Willy Bolander's research at Florida State University quantifies the impact, finding that up to 26.6% of sales performance variance comes directly from social capital. The company of one approach diverges sharply from "growth hacking" techniques that prioritize metrics over relationships. Where growth hackers might use aggressive tactics like unauthorized contact scraping (as app companies Glide and Circle did, damaging their reputations), relationship-focused businesses build more slowly but far more sustainably. They recognize that claiming "ownership" of an audience indicates fundamental misunderstanding—people choose to engage with multiple businesses and will quickly withdraw support from those that treat them as mere acquisition targets rather than valued community members. In essence, social capital represents the transformation of business relationships from extraction to mutual benefit. It's not about manipulative connection but about creating genuine value that eventually circles back as commercial opportunity—a sustainable cycle that grows stronger with each positive interaction.

Summary

The company of one framework offers a profound reconsideration of business fundamentals: success need not be measured by growth metrics but by sustainability, autonomy, and purpose fulfillment. By prioritizing resilience over scale, these organizations create remarkable stability in unstable times, developing the capacity to weather economic storms that devastate growth-dependent competitors. The enduring insight is that becoming "too small to fail" may represent the ultimate business achievement. When a company reaches a state of "enough"—having determined its optimal size for profitability and purpose—it gains the freedom to make choices based on values rather than external expectations. This doesn't mean rejecting advancement, but redefining it: improvement rather than expansion, depth rather than breadth, relationships rather than transactions. In questioning growth at every turn, companies of one discover that the path to lasting success often involves staying deliberately small while becoming exceptionally good.

About Author

Loading...

Paul Jarvis

Paul Jarvis is a veteran of the online tech world, and over the years has had such corporate clients as Microsoft, Yahoo, Mercedes-Benz, Warner Music and even Shaquille O'Neal. ​Today, he teaches online courses, runs several software businesses and hosts a handful of podcasts from his home on an island on the West Coast of Canada.

Read more