Crime and Punishment

Crime and Punishment Plot Summary

Introduction

In the sweltering heat of St. Petersburg, a destitute former student paces through crowded streets, his mind consumed by a terrible idea. "Am I a trembling creature or do I have the right?" This question haunts Rodion Raskolnikov as he contemplates an act that will test the very foundations of morality. Dostoevsky's masterpiece plunges readers into the feverish mind of a man who believes himself above conventional moral law, following his psychological journey from the planning of a murder through its execution and the subsequent unraveling of his rationalized worldview. Published in 1866, this work revolutionized literature by shifting focus from external actions to the internal landscape of guilt, justification, and redemption. The brilliance of this psychological thriller lies in its unflinching exploration of the human condition. Through Raskolnikov's tortured consciousness, we confront universal questions about morality, suffering, and redemption that transcend time and culture. The novel's innovative stream-of-consciousness technique allows readers unprecedented access to a criminal's mind, not merely to witness his actions but to understand the complex web of reasoning, emotion, and circumstance that drives him. As we follow this journey from crime to punishment, we are invited to examine our own moral boundaries and the consequences of transgressing them—making this not merely a story about one man's crime, but an exploration of what it means to be human in a world where traditional values are increasingly questioned.

Chapter 1: The Desperate Plan and Double Murder

In a cramped garret room that feels more like a coffin than living quarters, Rodion Raskolnikov develops his desperate plan. Once a promising law student, he has fallen into extreme poverty, pawning his few possessions to an elderly pawnbroker named Alyona Ivanovna. Over months of isolation and hunger, he formulates a dangerous theory: that extraordinary men have the right to transgress moral boundaries for the greater good. Napoleon becomes his model—a man who stepped over conventional morality to achieve greatness. In his feverish reasoning, Raskolnikov convinces himself that killing the "worthless, harmful louse" of a pawnbroker would be an act of social justice, freeing her hoarded wealth for better purposes. After careful preparation, including a practice visit to the pawnbroker's apartment and securing an axe from the building superintendent's wife, Raskolnikov executes his plan on a sweltering July evening. The murder itself unfolds with horrifying swiftness—the old woman falls with a single blow to the skull. But what Raskolnikov hadn't anticipated was the arrival of the pawnbroker's gentle, simple-minded sister Lizaveta. In a moment of panic, he kills her too, thus claiming an innocent victim his philosophical justifications never accounted for. This unplanned second murder becomes the first crack in his carefully constructed moral theory. The aftermath of the murders immediately contradicts Raskolnikov's expectations. Rather than feeling empowered by his "extraordinary" act, he feels contaminated and terrified. He fumbles through the pawnbroker's belongings, taking only a handful of items before fleeing the scene. His escape is nearly compromised when other visitors arrive at the apartment, forcing him to hide until they leave. The carefully planned rational crime has become an irrational nightmare, and his theoretical justifications begin crumbling against the reality of what he has done. In the days following the murders, Raskolnikov falls into a feverish delirium. He hides the stolen items under a stone in a courtyard rather than using them to improve his situation. He obsessively checks his clothes for bloodstains and jumps at every knock on his door. When summoned to the police station on an unrelated matter concerning his debt to his landlady, he nearly confesses out of sheer nervous tension. The psychological punishment begins immediately, long before any legal consequences materialize—his own conscience becomes his first and most relentless prosecutor. Raskolnikov's strange behavior draws the attention of his loyal friend Razumikhin, who attempts to care for him during what appears to be a serious illness. Meanwhile, his mother Pulcheria Alexandrovna and sister Dunya arrive in St. Petersburg, having sacrificed to improve their financial situation specifically to help him. Their arrival intensifies his inner torment, as he must now hide his crime from those who love him most. The gap between his intellectual justification for murder and the psychological reality widens, setting the stage for the novel's central exploration of crime and its consequences not just in legal terms, but in the criminal's own soul.

Chapter 2: Fever, Delirium, and the Beginning of Punishment

The immediate aftermath of the murders plunges Raskolnikov into a state of physical and psychological breakdown. Confined to his tiny room, he alternates between feverish delirium and moments of terrifying lucidity. During his periods of consciousness, he obsessively checks the clothes he wore during the crime, searching for overlooked bloodstains. He hides the stolen items—a purse, a few trinkets, and some pledges from the pawnbroker's box—behind loose wallpaper rather than using them to alleviate his poverty. This practical failure reveals the first flaw in his theory: the "extraordinary man" who would use crime for greater purposes cannot even benefit from his transgression. News of the murders spreads through St. Petersburg, and Raskolnikov finds himself drawn to conversations about the crime with a strange compulsion. When his friend Razumikhin mentions the case, Raskolnikov nearly faints. During a visit to the police station regarding an unrelated debt notice, he overhears officers discussing the murder investigation and again nearly collapses. Rather than maintaining distance from the investigation, he hovers near it, simultaneously terrified of discovery yet compelled to know every detail. This self-destructive behavior becomes a pattern—he visits the scene of the crime, engages the police in discussions about the case, and seems almost to court discovery. His physical illness becomes a metaphor for his moral sickness. The fever that consumes him mirrors the burning guilt that his rational mind refuses to acknowledge. When delirious, he mutters incriminating statements that nearly reveal his secret to his friend Razumikhin and the doctor Zosimov, who attend him. His nightmares are populated by the murdered women, particularly the innocent Lizaveta with her meek, pleading expression. One especially disturbing dream from his childhood features the brutal beating of a horse—a premonition of his own crime and suffering that connects his present transgression to deeper psychological patterns. Raskolnikov's family arrives in St. Petersburg, unaware of his crime but concerned about his condition. His mother Pulcheria Alexandrovna and sister Dunya have made significant sacrifices for him—Dunya has even agreed to marry a wealthy but disagreeable man named Luzhin to improve their financial situation. Their arrival intensifies Raskolnikov's psychological torment, as he must now hide his crime from those closest to him. When he meets them, his behavior is erratic and cruel; he rejects Luzhin and nearly severs ties with his family, driven by the unbearable tension between their love and his terrible secret. During this period, Raskolnikov forms two significant connections that will shape his journey toward redemption. First, he encounters Marmeladov, a destitute alcoholic civil servant who dies in a street accident. Despite his own poverty, Raskolnikov gives money for Marmeladov's funeral and meets his daughter Sonya, who has been forced into prostitution to support her family. Second, he attracts the attention of Porfiry Petrovich, the brilliant examining magistrate assigned to the murder case. These relationships—one offering the possibility of spiritual redemption through suffering and love, the other representing the inevitable legal consequences of his crime—establish the dual path of punishment that Raskolnikov must navigate.

Chapter 3: Porfiry Petrovich: The Psychological Duel

The intellectual heart of the investigation emerges in the character of Porfiry Petrovich, the examining magistrate assigned to the murder case. Unlike conventional detectives who rely primarily on physical evidence, Porfiry employs psychological tactics that transform the investigation into an elaborate cat-and-mouse game. With his round, somewhat comical appearance and seemingly rambling conversation style, he conceals a razor-sharp intellect that immediately focuses on Raskolnikov as his prime suspect, not because of physical evidence but because of psychological intuition. Their first encounter occurs when Raskolnikov visits Porfiry's office to reclaim pawned items that belonged to his family. The conversation quickly turns to an article Raskolnikov had published months earlier titled "On Crime," in which he outlined his theory about "extraordinary men" who stand above conventional morality. Porfiry probes this theory with seemingly innocent curiosity, asking if such men have the right to commit crimes—even murder—for the greater good. Raskolnikov, unable to resist the intellectual challenge despite the danger, defends his ideas, thereby revealing his philosophical justification for murder without realizing he is incriminating himself. What follows is a series of verbal duels that form the psychological core of the novel. In their second meeting, Porfiry employs a strategy of deliberate confusion—changing subjects abruptly, making contradictory statements, and creating an atmosphere of uncertainty that keeps Raskolnikov perpetually off-balance. "I'm playing with open cards," Porfiry claims, though his strategy is anything but transparent. He allows Raskolnikov to believe at times that he is suspected, and at other times that he is in the clear, creating psychological pressure that slowly wears down his defenses. The investigation takes an unexpected turn when a house painter named Nikolai confesses to the murders. Though Porfiry quickly recognizes this confession as false, it provides temporary relief for Raskolnikov. During their final confrontation, Porfiry reveals that he knows Raskolnikov is the murderer but lacks sufficient evidence for an arrest. "It was you who killed the old woman and her sister," he declares directly. Rather than immediately arresting him, however, Porfiry offers Raskolnikov a chance to confess voluntarily, promising a reduced sentence if he does so. Porfiry's approach to criminal investigation represents a revolutionary understanding of crime and punishment. He tells Raskolnikov, "I'm convinced that every criminal experiences something like a disease at the moment of the crime... a breakdown of the will and reasoning faculties." This insight into the psychological nature of crime suggests that punishment begins not with legal consequences but in the criminal's own mind. Porfiry's goal is not merely to gather evidence but to create conditions where Raskolnikov will confess of his own accord, driven by his internal psychological torment and need for redemption.

Chapter 4: Sonya's Compassion and the Path to Confession

Amid his psychological warfare with Porfiry and his own tormented conscience, Raskolnikov forms an unlikely bond with Sonya Marmeladova, a young woman forced into prostitution to support her impoverished family. Their connection begins when Raskolnikov witnesses the death of Sonya's father, Marmeladov, in a street accident. Despite his own poverty, Raskolnikov gives his last rubles to the family and meets Sonya, whose quiet dignity in the face of terrible suffering immediately affects him. Though she wears the yellow ticket that marks her as a prostitute, Sonya maintains a profound spiritual purity through selfless sacrifice. Sonya represents a radical alternative to Raskolnikov's philosophy. Where he justified crime through intellectual theories, she endures humiliation and suffering out of love for others. Though she has been forced to "transgress" social norms by becoming a prostitute, she maintains her spiritual integrity through faith and selfless love. During his visits to her humble room, Raskolnikov is simultaneously drawn to her moral strength and compelled to test its limits, alternating between cruelty and vulnerability as he struggles with his own need for confession and redemption. In a pivotal scene, Raskolnikov asks Sonya to read the biblical story of Lazarus being raised from the dead. The resurrection narrative—"Lazarus, come forth!"—becomes a metaphor for Raskolnikov's potential spiritual rebirth. During this same visit, in a moment of overwhelming emotion, he confesses his crime to her. Rather than recoiling in horror, Sonya responds with compassion and urges him to confess publicly and accept his punishment as the path to redemption: "Go to the crossroads, bow down to the people, kiss the earth you have defiled, and say aloud to the whole world: 'I am a murderer!'" Sonya's influence grows as Raskolnikov's mental state deteriorates further. When Svidrigailov, a morally corrupt landowner who lusts after Dunya, overhears Raskolnikov's confession to Sonya, the threat of exposure becomes imminent. This crisis forces Raskolnikov to confront his options: continue living with his secret and the isolation it creates, or follow Sonya's path of confession and suffering as the road to possible redemption. Her promise to follow him to Siberia if he accepts his punishment offers the first glimpse of human connection that might survive his crime. After a final confrontation with Porfiry and the suicide of Svidrigailov (whose moral corruption serves as a dark mirror to Raskolnikov's own transgression), Raskolnikov makes his decision. Following Sonya to the Haymarket Square, he falls to his knees and kisses the ground—a traditional Russian gesture of repentance. Though unable to confess publicly as Sonya had urged, this act marks the beginning of his acceptance of guilt. He then goes to the police station and declares: "It was I who killed the old pawnbroker and her sister Lizaveta with an axe and robbed them." With these words, he begins the journey from intellectual pride to humble acceptance of his common humanity.

Chapter 5: Svidrigailov's Dark Mirror

Into the moral landscape of the novel enters Arkady Ivanovich Svidrigailov, one of literature's most disturbing and enigmatic characters. A former employer of Raskolnikov's sister Dunya, Svidrigailov had previously pursued her with unwanted advances, leading to her departure from his household. Now, following the death of his wife Marfa Petrovna, he has come to St. Petersburg with mysterious intentions that revolve around Dunya. His arrival introduces a character who serves as a dark mirror to Raskolnikov—another man who has transgressed moral boundaries, but without the torment of conscience that plagues the younger man. Svidrigailov represents the ultimate consequence of moral transgression without repentance or redemption. Where Raskolnikov suffers from his crime, Svidrigailov appears to have moved beyond suffering altogether, existing in a state of jaded ennui. Rumors surround him: that he may have been responsible for his wife's death, that he has seduced young girls, that he has driven a servant to suicide. Yet he carries these accusations with an unsettling calm, neither confirming nor denying them. "One can do good as well as evil," he remarks casually, suggesting a man who has moved beyond conventional morality into a realm where such distinctions have ceased to matter. The parallels between Svidrigailov and Raskolnikov are deliberately drawn. Both men have transgressed moral boundaries, but while Raskolnikov suffers for his crime, Svidrigailov appears to suffer from the absence of consequences—from a spiritual emptiness that no new sensation can fill. "Eternity," he tells Raskolnikov, might be "just a small room, like a bathhouse in the country, black with soot, with spiders in every corner." This nihilistic vision of the afterlife reflects his spiritual condition—a man who has looked into the moral abyss and been consumed by it. Svidrigailov's pursuit of Dunya intensifies the novel's tension. When she agrees to meet him privately—believing he has information about her brother—he reveals his true intentions, attempting to force himself upon her. In a powerful scene that reveals her strength of character, Dunya produces a revolver and threatens to shoot him rather than submit. Her moral clarity contrasts sharply with Svidrigailov's corruption, just as Sonya's spiritual strength contrasts with Raskolnikov's moral confusion. These parallel relationships highlight the novel's exploration of different responses to suffering and transgression. Svidrigailov's story reaches its conclusion when, after a night of disturbing dreams populated by his victims, he commits suicide in a public square. His final act suggests that even he could not entirely escape the consequences of his moral transgressions. In his suicide note, he leaves a substantial sum to Dunya and to the Marmeladov children, a final ambiguous gesture that leaves open the question of whether even the most corrupted soul might retain some capacity for good. Through Svidrigailov, the novel explores the ultimate consequences of moral transgression without repentance—a spiritual death that precedes physical death.

Chapter 6: Siberia: Suffering and Spiritual Rebirth

Raskolnikov's formal punishment—eight years of hard labor in Siberia—forms only a brief epilogue to the novel, yet contains its most profound transformation. The trial itself passes quickly in the narrative; mitigating circumstances, including his voluntary confession and previous acts of charity, result in a sentence less severe than might have been expected. Sonya follows him to Siberia, settling in the town near his prison camp and visiting whenever regulations permit, though Raskolnikov initially remains cold and unresponsive to her devotion. Life in the prison camp is brutal. The other convicts dislike Raskolnikov, particularly when they discover he is an atheist and a murderer of common people rather than someone who committed a crime against authority. "You're a gentleman," they tell him with contempt. "What business did you have with an axe?" Their instinctive moral sense recognizes something perverse in his intellectual justification for murder. This isolation from his fellow prisoners mirrors his earlier isolation from humanity, but now it is externally imposed rather than self-created. For over a year, Raskolnikov maintains his spiritual isolation. He falls ill again during the second spring of his imprisonment, and during his convalescence begins to reflect on his life. He realizes that throughout his ordeal, he has never truly repented for his crime. He has confessed and accepted punishment, but has not experienced genuine remorse or reconnection with humanity. "What had he to repent of?" the narrator asks. "That he had killed a vile, harmful louse?" This lingering attachment to his rationalization keeps Raskolnikov imprisoned within himself, even as his body is confined by external walls. The turning point comes unexpectedly. Seeing Sonya from a distance during his recovery, Raskolnikov is suddenly overwhelmed by feelings he has suppressed. He rushes to her, falls at her feet weeping, and embraces her knees. Something has broken within him—his pride, his theories, his isolation—and love floods in to replace them. "Instead of dialectics, there was life," the narrator observes, signaling Raskolnikov's movement from abstract philosophy to lived moral experience. The love he feels for Sonya connects him once again to humanity, allowing him to recognize the fundamental error of his theory—that genuine greatness lies not in standing above others but in recognizing our shared humanity. The novel concludes with a vision of gradual renewal rather than immediate transformation. Raskolnikov still has seven years of his sentence remaining—years that will be necessary for his complete moral rehabilitation. Yet with the New Testament Sonya has given him resting under his pillow, and with love awakening in his heart, the path forward is clear. "This is the beginning of a new story," the narrator tells us, "the story of the gradual renewal of a man, of his gradual regeneration, of his slow progress from one world to another." In this conclusion, the novel affirms that true redemption comes not through escaping punishment but through accepting it as the necessary consequence of one's actions.

Summary

The enduring power of this psychological masterpiece lies in its unflinching exploration of the human capacity for both moral transgression and redemption. Through Raskolnikov's journey, we witness the devastating consequences of intellectual pride divorced from human connection—a cautionary tale about the dangers of abstract theories that ignore the complex reality of human suffering. The novel's psychological depth reveals how punishment begins not with external consequences but within the criminal's own consciousness, where the violation of deeply ingrained moral instincts creates an unbearable isolation from humanity. This internal punishment proves far more tormenting than any legal sentence, suggesting that our moral nature cannot be overridden by intellectual justifications without profound psychological damage. Beyond its brilliant psychological portrait of crime and guilt, the work offers a profound meditation on the path to redemption. Through Sonya's compassion and Raskolnikov's eventual spiritual awakening, we see that genuine renewal comes not through escaping consequences but through embracing them—through the humble acceptance of one's common humanity and capacity for both good and evil. The epilogue's vision of "gradual renewal" suggests that redemption is not an instantaneous transformation but a slow, painful process of spiritual rebirth. This message transcends its 19th-century Russian context to speak to universal human experiences of moral failing, suffering, and the possibility of renewal. In an age increasingly dominated by relativistic moral frameworks, the novel's insistence on the reality of conscience and the necessity of atonement offers a timeless counterpoint to the dangerous illusion that we can transgress moral boundaries without cost to our essential humanity.

About Author

Loading...

Fyodor Dostoevsky

Фёдор Михайлович Достоевский (Russian)Works, such as the novels Crime and Punishment (1866), The Idiot (1869), and The Brothers Karamazov (1880), of Russian writer Feodor Mikhailovich Dostoyevsky or Dostoevski combine religious mysticism with profound psychological insight. Very influential writings of Mikhail Mikhailovich Bakhtin included Problems of Dostoyevsky's Works (1929), Fyodor Mikhailovich Dostoevsky composed short stories, essays, and journals. His literature explores humans in the troubled political, social, and spiritual atmospheres of 19th-century and engages with a variety of philosophies and themes. People most acclaimed his Demons(1872) . Many literary critics rate him of the greatest of world literature and consider multiple highly influential masterpieces. They consider his Notes from Underground of the first existentialist literature. He also well acts as a philosopher and theologian. (Russian: Фёдор Михайлович Достоевский) (see also Fiodor Dostoïevski)

Read more