Crowds and Power

Crowds and Power Plot Summary

Introduction

Human history has been profoundly shaped by the dynamics of crowds, yet our understanding of crowd behavior remains surprisingly limited. The exploration of crowds reveals fundamental truths about power structures, social organization, and the human condition itself. By examining how crowds form, transform, and dissolve, we gain insight into the psychological mechanisms that drive mass movements, revolutions, religions, and even everyday social interactions. The analysis presented challenges conventional wisdom by approaching crowds not as anomalies but as essential expressions of human nature. Through meticulous examination of historical events, cultural practices, and psychological patterns across diverse societies, a comprehensive theory emerges that connects seemingly disparate phenomena - from religious gatherings to political rallies, from ancient hunting packs to modern nation-states. This perspective offers valuable insights for understanding contemporary social movements, political polarization, and the manipulation of mass psychology in the digital age, revealing how ancient crowd dynamics continue to operate within modern institutions and technologies.

Chapter 1: The Fundamental Nature of Crowds and Their Formation

Nothing reveals more about human nature than our relationship with crowds. The most primal fear that shapes this relationship is the fear of being touched by the unknown. In everyday life, we maintain careful distances from others, creating invisible boundaries that protect us from unexpected contact. We construct houses, establish personal spaces, and follow unspoken rules of physical separation. The repugnance toward unwanted touch is so deeply ingrained that we immediately apologize when accidentally brushing against strangers. Yet this fundamental fear undergoes a remarkable reversal within a crowd. In the density of a crowd, where body presses against body, this fear transforms into its opposite - a desire for contact. The boundaries between individuals dissolve, creating a sensation of equality and unity. When someone surrenders to a crowd, they experience a profound relief from the burden of maintaining separation. This transformation represents one of the most significant psychological shifts in human experience, as the individual temporarily escapes the isolation of ordinary existence. Crowds can be classified according to several key characteristics. Open crowds have no boundaries and are defined by their growth - they exist to increase in size and disintegrate when growth stops. Closed crowds, by contrast, establish boundaries, limiting their size but gaining permanence. The moment of discharge is crucial to understanding crowd psychology - this is when all distinctions between members disappear and a sense of absolute equality emerges. This equality, however fleeting, provides the emotional foundation for all theories of justice and equality throughout human history. The density of a crowd creates a unique psychological state where individuals feel stronger than they would alone. Physical proximity becomes a metaphor for unity of purpose, and the sensation of countless others moving in the same direction generates a feeling of invincibility. This explains why crowds often exhibit behaviors that individuals within them would never display on their own - the psychological transformation is complete and profound. The direction of a crowd provides its essential momentum. A crowd without a goal quickly disintegrates; with a clear objective, it maintains cohesion and purpose. Whether moving toward a physical location, a political aim, or a symbolic target, this directional quality gives crowds their distinctive energy and prevents their premature dissolution. Understanding these fundamental attributes helps explain why crowds throughout history have been both vehicles for liberation and instruments of destruction.

Chapter 2: Transformation as a Key Element in Crowd Behavior

Transformation constitutes perhaps the most profound yet least understood aspect of crowd dynamics. When individuals enter a crowd, they undergo a remarkable psychological metamorphosis—their normal identity recedes and a new, collective identity emerges. This transformation is not merely superficial but represents a fundamental shift in consciousness. Individuals who might normally be cautious, rational, and self-interested become capable of extraordinary selflessness, courage, or conversely, cruelty when absorbed into a crowd. This transformation explains why ordinarily law-abiding citizens may participate in looting during riots or why typically mild-mannered individuals might engage in violence at political rallies. The transformation process follows distinct phases. Initially, individuals experience a loosening of their normal identity boundaries—inhibitions weaken, social constraints diminish, and awareness of personal distinctiveness fades. This creates a psychological opening where the collective identity can take root. Next comes a phase of heightened suggestibility, where individuals become extraordinarily receptive to symbols, slogans, and emotional cues from the crowd. Finally, a new temporary identity crystallizes, aligned with the crowd's dominant emotional tone and purpose. This transformed state explains the seemingly mysterious "group mind" phenomenon that has puzzled observers throughout history. Transformation within crowds operates through several mechanisms. Mimesis—the unconscious imitation of others' behaviors and emotional states—serves as a primary vehicle for transformation. Individuals automatically synchronize their movements, expressions, and eventually their emotional states with those around them. Emotional contagion amplifies this effect, as feelings spread through crowds with remarkable speed and intensity. Additionally, the anonymity provided by crowds facilitates transformation by temporarily removing social accountability, allowing expression of normally suppressed aspects of personality. The depth of transformation varies according to crowd types and individual predispositions. In "baiting crowds" focused on attacking a target, transformation can be profound, with individuals becoming almost unrecognizable in their behavior. In "flight crowds" responding to danger, transformation manifests as heightened alertness and coordination. "Feast crowds" produce transformations characterized by joyful abandonment of normal restraints. Individual differences in susceptibility to transformation remain significant—some people resist crowd influence while others transform rapidly and completely. Transformation explains the paradoxical relationship between crowds and power structures. While crowds can overthrow existing power arrangements through revolutionary action, they simultaneously create conditions for new forms of authority to emerge. Leaders who understand transformation dynamics can catalyze and direct these processes, effectively "riding the tiger" of crowd energy. Historical figures from religious prophets to political revolutionaries have mastered the art of triggering transformative processes in crowds to achieve their objectives. The transformative potential of crowds reveals both promise and peril for human societies. On one hand, transformation enables extraordinary collective achievements—from barn-raisings to social movements—that would be impossible through individual effort alone. On the other hand, the same transformative power can produce destructive mob behavior or make populations vulnerable to manipulation by demagogues. Understanding transformation as a key element in crowd behavior provides essential insight into both the creative and destructive potential of human collectivity.

Chapter 3: Command Structures and Their Psychological Impacts

Commands represent one of the most fundamental and least examined elements of human power dynamics. A command is essentially a death sentence that has been domesticated. In its original biological form, it appears as the flight-command - when a predator threatens prey, forcing it to flee or die. This primal relationship has been transformed in human societies, but its essential character remains unchanged. Every command contains an implicit threat, and this threat is what gives it force. The domestication of commands occurred primarily through their association with rewards, especially food. Instead of simply threatening death, human commands began offering sustenance as compensation for obedience. This modification allowed for the development of complex hierarchical systems where commands could flow downward through multiple levels. Yet despite this domestication, commands retain their fundamental nature as threats. The difference is merely that the threatened death has been postponed, converted into a more abstract form of coercion. What makes commands particularly significant is that they leave behind what can be called a "sting" in those who obey them. This sting represents the resistance that was overcome when the command was obeyed - the natural human impulse to reject external control that had to be suppressed. These stings accumulate throughout life, beginning in childhood when we first learn to obey our parents and teachers. They remain lodged within us, undigested and unchanged, waiting for an opportunity to be discharged. The discharge of these stings can only occur when the original command situation is recreated, but with roles reversed. The person who once obeyed must now command someone else in precisely the same manner. This explains why patterns of authority tend to reproduce themselves so exactly across generations - why parents often find themselves using the exact phrases their own parents used, despite having resented them as children. It also explains the psychological appeal of promotion in hierarchical systems. When a soldier is promoted, he can finally give the same orders he once had to obey, thus releasing some of his accumulated stings. Military systems represent the most refined expression of command structures. The soldier is trained to exist in a permanent state of command expectation - his entire being becomes oriented toward the reception and execution of orders. This creates a psychological state where the individual's will is effectively suspended, replaced by an exquisite receptivity to external direction. The extreme form of this condition appears in religious contexts, particularly in Islam and Calvinism, where believers cultivate a similar receptivity to divine commands, living in constant expectation of God's will.

Chapter 4: Power Relationships Between Leaders and Followers

Power relationships between leaders and followers constitute complex psychological and social dynamics that extend far beyond simple dominance and submission. At their foundation lies a paradoxical interdependence—leaders require followers to validate their authority, while followers seek leaders to provide direction and embody collective identity. This mutual dependence creates a relationship that is simultaneously collaborative and antagonistic, with both parties engaged in continuous negotiation of boundaries and expectations. The psychological contract between leaders and followers operates through several mechanisms. Distance management represents a crucial element—leaders must maintain sufficient psychological distance to preserve their authority while remaining close enough to understand and respond to followers' needs. This delicate balance explains why leaders often employ elaborate rituals, distinctive dress, or special language to mark their separation while simultaneously using rhetoric that emphasizes their connection to followers. The most effective leaders master this distance paradox, appearing simultaneously extraordinary and relatable. Leaders employ various techniques to establish and maintain their position. Crowd crystallization represents one primary method—leaders serve as focal points around which crowds form and organize. They achieve this by embodying distinctive qualities that differentiate them from followers while simultaneously representing collective aspirations. Symbol manipulation constitutes another crucial technique, with leaders appropriating and controlling powerful cultural symbols to legitimize their authority. Additionally, leaders employ what might be called "survival display"—demonstrating their capacity to overcome challenges that would defeat ordinary individuals, thereby proving their worthiness to lead. Followers play a far more active role in power relationships than commonly recognized. Rather than passively accepting leadership, followers continuously evaluate leaders against complex criteria including competence, fairness, and conformity to group values. Followers grant provisional authority to leaders who meet these criteria and withdraw support from those who fail. This evaluative process may operate below conscious awareness, but it fundamentally shapes power dynamics. Followers also engage in boundary-setting behaviors that limit leadership authority, from subtle non-compliance to open resistance. Power relationships evolve through predictable phases. Initial establishment involves heightened idealization, with followers projecting extraordinary qualities onto leaders and leaders presenting their most impressive aspects. Consolidation follows, where practical arrangements of authority are negotiated and tested. Maturation represents the stable phase of the relationship, characterized by established routines and expectations. Deterioration occurs when leaders fail to meet follower expectations or when external circumstances undermine leadership effectiveness. Finally, transformation or termination concludes the cycle, with either a fundamental change in the relationship or its dissolution. The most revealing aspect of power relationships emerges during crises, when normal patterns of interaction are disrupted. In these moments, the underlying psychological contract between leaders and followers becomes visible. Leaders who successfully navigate crises demonstrate adaptability while maintaining core leadership functions—providing direction, embodying group identity, and managing collective anxiety. Followers, confronted with uncertainty, may either increase their commitment to leaders or withdraw support entirely. These crisis points often reveal whether power relationships are based on genuine mutual benefit or mere coercion, as relationships founded solely on force typically collapse under pressure while those with deeper foundations demonstrate remarkable resilience.

Chapter 5: The Survivor Complex in Leaders and Despots

The survivor occupies a unique psychological position that forms the foundation of power. When one person remains standing while others fall, a profound transformation occurs in their consciousness. This is not merely about physical survival but about the psychological experience of outlasting others. The survivor feels chosen, superior, and invested with special significance precisely because they continue to exist while others do not. This sensation creates an intoxicating sense of triumph that easily becomes addictive. Throughout history, rulers have positioned themselves as survivors par excellence. The ancient practice of building monuments to military victories celebrates not just conquest but survival - the fact that the ruler remains while enemies have perished. This psychology explains the seemingly paradoxical behavior of many historical tyrants who, despite achieving absolute security, continued to manufacture situations where others died while they lived. Each new death reinforced their status as the ultimate survivor, feeding a psychological need that could never be fully satisfied. The relationship between survival and power manifests most clearly in the institution of kingship. Traditional kings were often required to outlast ritualized challengers, proving their right to rule through their capacity to survive. Even after such customs faded, the symbolic association remained. The king represented the enduring principle that survived while individual subjects perished. Royal succession ceremonies emphasize this continuity - "The king is dead, long live the king" - suggesting that while the person may die, the principle of sovereignty survives uninterrupted. This survival psychology creates a fundamental paradox for rulers. While they derive satisfaction from outlasting others, they simultaneously fear being survived. The despot's hostility toward potential successors stems from this contradiction - each successor represents someone who will ultimately survive the ruler, negating his position as the ultimate survivor. This explains the recurring pattern throughout history of rulers destroying their own children or closest allies, those most likely to succeed them. The fear of being survived can become so intense that it overrides even basic self-interest. Modern political systems attempt to manage this paradox through institutionalized succession, but the psychological dynamics remain. Even in democracies, leaders often display a preoccupation with their legacy - with how they will be remembered after they are gone. This represents a sublimated form of the survival impulse, an attempt to project one's existence beyond physical death. Understanding this psychology helps explain why power so often corrupts - it activates primitive survival impulses that override ethical considerations and rational self-interest.

Chapter 6: Paranoia as the Ultimate Expression of Power

Paranoia represents not merely a psychological disorder but the ultimate expression and logical conclusion of unchecked power. When power reaches its zenith, it paradoxically transforms into a state of perpetual insecurity and hypervigilance. This transformation occurs because absolute power eliminates all external constraints while simultaneously removing reliable feedback mechanisms, leaving the powerful individual in an informational vacuum where threats seem omnipresent yet impossible to verify. The paranoid mindset thus emerges not as an aberration but as the natural psychological endpoint of power's trajectory. The paranoid power-holder develops distinctive cognitive patterns. Reality ordering becomes a primary preoccupation—the need to impose comprehensive explanatory frameworks that account for all events, particularly those perceived as threatening. These explanatory systems are characterized by their totality (nothing happens by chance), personalization (events occur specifically to affect the paranoid individual), and malevolent attribution (ambiguous actions are interpreted as hostile). This cognitive structure creates a self-reinforcing system where contradictory evidence is incorporated into the paranoid framework rather than challenging it. Paranoid leadership manifests through specific behavioral patterns. Surveillance proliferation represents one common expression—the creation of ever-expanding systems to monitor potential threats, particularly among close associates. Loyalty testing emerges as another characteristic behavior, with subordinates subjected to arbitrary and often impossible tests designed to reveal suspected disloyalty. Most distinctively, paranoid leaders engage in preemptive elimination of perceived threats based on increasingly tenuous evidence, creating cycles of purges that progressively destabilize their power structures even as they seek to secure them. The relationship between paranoia and power operates bidirectionally. Power creates conditions conducive to paranoid thinking by removing normal constraints on thought and behavior while simultaneously raising the stakes of potential betrayal. Conversely, paranoid thinking enhances certain aspects of power by creating hypervigilance that can detect genuine threats and by generating unpredictability that keeps potential challengers off-balance. This reciprocal relationship explains why paranoia frequently accompanies supreme power across diverse cultural and historical contexts, from ancient despots to modern dictators. The case study of Daniel Paul Schreber, a German judge who developed paranoid delusions, provides remarkable insight into the structure of paranoid power. Schreber's elaborate delusional system, documented in his Memoirs of My Nervous Illness, reveals striking parallels with the thought patterns of actual rulers. His belief that he was the center of cosmic attention, that ordinary events carried special significance for him alone, and that he faced both persecution and special destiny mirrors the psychological world of many historical autocrats. The difference lies not in the structure of thought but merely in the reality basis—Schreber lacked actual power while rulers possess it. Understanding paranoia as power's ultimate expression offers crucial insights for political theory and practice. It suggests that power requires not just external checks and balances but psychological counterweights that prevent the paranoid mindset from developing. These might include institutionalized criticism, protected spaces for honest feedback, and cultural norms that value self-reflection and doubt. Most fundamentally, it indicates that absolute power is inherently self-destructive—the paranoid mindset it generates inevitably undermines the judgment and relationship capacities necessary for effective leadership, creating a psychological trap from which even the most capable ruler cannot escape.

Chapter 7: Crowd Symbols and Their Historical Manifestations

National identity crystallizes around specific crowd symbols that capture the collective imagination and shape how people understand their relationship to the nation. These symbols are not arbitrary but emerge from historical experience and geographical circumstance, reflecting how a people has experienced itself as a collective entity. Understanding these symbols provides insight into the distinctive character of different national consciousnesses and explains patterns of behavior that might otherwise seem inexplicable. For the English, the sea functions as the primary crowd symbol. The Englishman imagines himself as a captain on a ship, commanding the vast, changeable ocean - a relationship that emphasizes both isolation and control. This symbol explains the peculiar combination of individualism and imperial ambition that has characterized English history. The captain stands alone on his vessel, separate from others, yet exercises authority over an expansive domain. This image shapes English political consciousness, creating a nation comfortable with both individual liberty and global power projection. The German national consciousness has historically organized itself around the forest as its crowd symbol. The forest represents order within multiplicity - each tree stands separate yet forms part of a greater whole. This symbol helps explain the German emphasis on discipline and organic unity. The forest-symbol transformed naturally into the army, with its rows of uniformed men standing at attention like trees in formation. This connection between forest and army illuminated the peculiar character of German nationalism, with its combination of romantic nature-worship and military discipline. For the French, the Revolution serves as the central crowd symbol. The storming of the Bastille represents the archetypal moment when the crowd asserts itself against established authority. This symbol explains the cyclical pattern of French political life, with its recurring revolutionary moments. The annual celebration of Bastille Day allows for the periodic reenactment of this foundational experience, providing a controlled outlet for revolutionary energy while reinforcing national identity. Other nations organize their consciousness around different symbols: the Swiss around their mountains, the Spanish around the bullfight, the Jews around their exodus through the desert. Each symbol captures something essential about how the nation experiences itself as a collective entity. These symbols are not merely metaphorical but shape actual behavior, influencing how nations respond to crises and opportunities. Understanding a nation's crowd symbol provides insight into its likely behavior that purely rational analysis might miss. The power of these national crowd symbols explains why attempts to impose new symbols often fail. When fascism attempted to give Italy a new crowd symbol based on ancient Rome, the artificiality of this construction prevented it from taking root in the national consciousness. Effective crowd symbols cannot be manufactured but must emerge organically from collective experience. This explains why nationalist movements succeed when they tap into existing crowd symbols and fail when they attempt to fabricate new ones.

Summary

The dynamics of crowds and power reveal fundamental patterns that shape human societies across time and cultures. At their core, these patterns revolve around our paradoxical nature as beings who simultaneously seek individuation and dissolution, who fear death yet are fascinated by it, who resist transformation while constantly pursuing it. These tensions manifest in recurring social formations - from religious congregations to political movements, from military hierarchies to revolutionary uprisings - that channel our conflicting impulses into structured expressions. What emerges from this analysis is a profound recognition that power operates not primarily through rational calculation but through manipulation of primal human responses. The most effective systems of control work by managing transformation - allowing it in controlled circumstances while preventing spontaneous expressions that might threaten established order. They harness our fear of death while exploiting our desire to survive others. They utilize commands that penetrate individual consciousness while creating collective movements that provide temporary liberation from those same commands. Understanding these mechanisms does not necessarily free us from their influence, but it does illuminate the hidden architecture of social control that shapes our lives and possibilities. For those willing to confront these uncomfortable truths, a new perspective opens - one that might allow us to recognize our susceptibility to crowd dynamics while preserving the critical awareness necessary for genuine freedom.

About Author

Loading...

Elias Canetti

Awarded the 1981 Nobel Prize in Literature "for writings marked by a broad outlook, a wealth of ideas and artistic power."He studied in Vienna. Before World War II he moved with his wife Veza to England and stayed there for long time. Since late 1960s he lived in London and Zurich. In late 1980s he started to live in Zurich permanently. He died in 1994 in Zurich. Author of Auto-da-Fé, Party in the Blitz, Crowds and Power, and The Voices of Marrakesh: A Record of a Visit

Read more