Do I Make Myself Clear?

Do I Make Myself Clear? Plot Summary

Introduction

In today's digital age, we are inundated with more information than ever before, yet clarity seems increasingly elusive. Words have consequences, and when language becomes obscured by jargon, passive voice, and unnecessary complexity, these consequences can be dire. From misunderstood mortgage agreements that contributed to financial crisis to incomprehensible governmental policies that affect millions, the fog of unclear communication impacts every aspect of modern life. The ability to communicate with precision and transparency is not merely an aesthetic preference but a moral imperative. When we examine historical moments of consequence—from political rhetoric that shaped nations to scientific breakthroughs that changed paradigms—we find that clarity was the common denominator in effective communication. By analyzing the mechanics of clear writing, identifying common pitfalls, and providing practical strategies for improvement, we can navigate through the pervasive information fog. This journey through linguistic clarity reveals that precision in language is not about simplification at the expense of sophistication, but rather about illuminating complex ideas in ways that respect readers' intelligence while ensuring comprehension.

Chapter 1: The Lost Art of Clear Communication

Communication has become increasingly complex in modern discourse, obscuring meaning rather than illuminating it. We have gradually replaced active, concrete language with abstract nouns, passive constructions, and jargon that distance readers from the ideas being conveyed. This trend is evident across domains—from corporate communications filled with "strategic initiatives" and "synergistic approaches" to academic papers that seem deliberately impenetrable. The deterioration of clarity can be traced to several factors. First, there's the misconception that complexity signals intelligence or expertise. Many writers believe that using specialized terminology and convoluted sentences will impress readers, when in fact the opposite is true. The most profound thinkers throughout history have been able to express complex ideas in accessible language. Second, bureaucratic and legal writing has normalized opacity, with passive voice allowing institutions to obscure responsibility and action. Digital communication has exacerbated these problems. The speed of information exchange has reduced thoughtful editing, while algorithmic content creation prioritizes quantity over quality. Additionally, the proliferation of specialized fields has created siloed language communities that rarely communicate effectively with outsiders. As a result, important information often fails to reach those who need it most. The consequences of unclear communication extend far beyond mere confusion. When medical instructions are misunderstood, patients suffer. When financial terms are obscured, consumers make poor decisions. When political rhetoric becomes deliberately ambiguous, democracy itself is undermined. Clear communication is not merely a stylistic preference but an ethical obligation that affects real lives. This decline is not irreversible. By recognizing patterns of obfuscation and practicing deliberate clarity, we can reclaim communication as a tool for understanding rather than confusion. The lost art of clear communication can be recovered through conscious effort and recognition of its fundamental importance to social functioning.

Chapter 2: Tools for Precision: Active Voice and Concrete Language

Precision in language begins with the fundamental tools of active voice and concrete language. Active voice places responsibility where it belongs by clearly identifying who does what. Compare "Mistakes were made" with "The committee made mistakes." The first construction, in passive voice, obscures accountability; the second leaves no doubt about who bears responsibility. This distinction is not merely grammatical but ethical—it determines whether information is transparent or obfuscated. Concrete language forms the backbone of clear communication. Abstract terms like "consideration was given to operational improvements" convey little meaningful information compared to "The team analyzed how to improve factory output." Concrete language creates mental images, while abstraction produces fog. This principle applies across all communication contexts, from technical writing to everyday conversations. When writers replace vague terms with specific ones, comprehension improves dramatically. The preference for unnecessary complexity often stems from insecurity. Writers fear that simple language will make them appear unsophisticated, when in fact the opposite is true. The most respected communicators in any field—from science to literature—are those who can explain complex ideas clearly. Albert Einstein famously noted that if you cannot explain something simply, you don't understand it well enough. This insight reveals the relationship between clarity and genuine understanding. Statistical evidence supports these principles. Studies show that texts using active voice and concrete language score significantly higher on comprehension tests across all education levels. Even readers with advanced degrees prefer clear, direct language when processing complex information. The cognitive load theory explains why: our working memory has limited capacity, and unnecessarily complex language wastes this precious resource. Implementation of these principles requires practice and vigilance. Writers must develop the habit of questioning each sentence: Is the actor clearly identified? Could this abstract concept be expressed more concretely? Is this jargon necessary, or could a more accessible term convey the same meaning? Through this process of careful editing, even the most complex ideas can be made accessible without sacrificing accuracy or depth.

Chapter 3: Identifying and Eliminating Unnecessary Complexity

Unnecessary complexity infiltrates our writing through various mechanisms that can be systematically identified and eliminated. The first and perhaps most pervasive form is the nominalizing tendency—transforming verbs into nouns, thereby draining sentences of their vitality. Instead of "They analyzed the problem," writers produce "An analysis of the problem was undertaken." This transformation typically requires additional words while reducing clarity, creating what Helen Sword aptly calls "zombie nouns" that consume the life of sentences. Prepositional phrase chains represent another common source of complexity. These phrases ("in consideration of the fact that," "with reference to," "in the event of") accumulate like barnacles on the hull of meaning, slowing comprehension without adding value. They often serve as weak substitutes for simpler connectives or transitions. For instance, "in the event that" simply means "if," while "due to the fact that" can be replaced with "because." Eliminating these chains often reduces word count by 30-50% while increasing readability. Jargon and technical language create unnecessary barriers when used indiscriminately. While specialized terminology serves legitimate purposes within professional communities, it becomes problematic when extended beyond appropriate contexts. The financial industry exemplifies this problem, using terms like "collateralized debt obligations" and "credit default swaps" in consumer-facing communications. Effective communicators distinguish between necessary technical terms and exclusionary jargon, using the former judiciously and avoiding the latter entirely. Structural complexity also impedes clarity when sentences become overloaded with clauses and qualifications. When a sentence requires multiple readings to parse its meaning, the structure has failed regardless of grammatical correctness. The solution lies not in avoiding complex ideas but in breaking them into digestible units. Complex thoughts may require multiple sentences, each building logically upon the last, rather than a single syntactical behemoth. The elimination process requires both attentiveness and courage—attentiveness to identify complexity and courage to simplify. Many writers fear that simplification equates to oversimplification, but this represents a false dichotomy. The most profound thinkers throughout history have expressed complex ideas with remarkable clarity. Einstein's E=mc² distills an extraordinary concept into a simple equation; similarly, careful writers can express sophisticated thoughts in accessible language without sacrificing nuance or accuracy.

Chapter 4: The Consequences of Unclear Writing in Public Discourse

Unclear writing in public discourse creates tangible harm that extends far beyond aesthetic concerns. Perhaps most significantly, it undermines democratic participation by making important civic information inaccessible to ordinary citizens. When legislation, regulations, and public policies are written in convoluted language, they effectively exclude the very people they are meant to serve. This exclusion is not merely inconvenient—it represents a fundamental barrier to informed citizenship and equal participation in democratic processes. The financial crisis of 2008 provides a stark illustration of clarity's consequences. Millions of Americans signed mortgage agreements with terms they could not understand, largely because these documents were deliberately written to obscure rather than illuminate. Terms like "negative amortization" and "balloon payment" were buried in dense paragraphs of legal jargon. When these obscured terms triggered devastating financial consequences, many homeowners discovered too late what they had unwittingly agreed to. This was not merely a failure of financial regulation but a failure of language. Healthcare represents another domain where unclear writing produces harmful outcomes. Medical instructions written above the reading level of intended audiences lead to medication errors, missed appointments, and poor adherence to treatment plans. Studies demonstrate that approximately 30% of Americans have basic or below basic health literacy, yet medical communications routinely exceed these comprehension levels. The resulting confusion contributes directly to poorer health outcomes and higher healthcare costs. Political discourse has suffered particularly from the fog of unclear language. Politicians increasingly employ what linguist George Lakoff calls "strategic ambiguity"—language deliberately crafted to mean different things to different audiences. This practice undermines accountability by allowing officials to claim they never promised specific actions. Similarly, euphemisms like "enhanced interrogation techniques" for torture or "collateral damage" for civilian casualties obscure moral realities through linguistic manipulation. The cumulative effect of unclear public discourse is an erosion of trust. When citizens consistently encounter language designed to confuse rather than clarify, they naturally develop skepticism toward institutions. This skepticism, while sometimes warranted, can metastasize into wholesale rejection of expertise and authority—including scientific consensus on issues like climate change or vaccine safety. Clear writing cannot alone restore trust, but it represents an essential first step toward more transparent and accountable public communication.

Chapter 5: Case Studies: From Bureaucracy to Journalism

Examining specific instances of both exemplary clarity and profound obscurity provides valuable insights into the practical application of clear communication principles. The Internal Revenue Service offers a particularly instructive case study in bureaucratic opacity. For decades, tax forms and instructions ranked among the most impenetrable documents encountered by American citizens, routinely exceeding graduate-level reading complexity. Following sustained criticism and legal mandates for plain language, the IRS undertook a comprehensive revision process, resulting in measurably improved comprehension. Form revisions reduced average sentence length from 27 to 16 words, eliminated passive constructions, and replaced technical jargon with everyday language. Subsequent studies demonstrated significant improvements in accuracy of tax filings and reduced time required for completion. Contrast the traditional IRS approach with the Centers for Disease Control's response to the 2014 Ebola outbreak. Facing potential panic, the CDC produced public health communications characterized by exceptional clarity. Their guidelines employed short sentences, active voice, and concrete language, explicitly addressing common misconceptions. Most notably, they resisted the tendency toward hedging and qualification that often plagues scientific communication. The result was public health information that achieved both accuracy and accessibility, demonstrating that technical precision need not sacrifice clarity. Journalism provides particularly revealing case studies in the evolution of clear writing. The New York Times' coverage of the 1912 Titanic disaster employed ornate Victorian prose with sentences averaging 40 words. By contrast, their reporting on the 2004 Indian Ocean tsunami utilized direct, concrete language with sentences averaging 19 words. This evolution reflects changing standards in journalistic clarity, but importantly, the shorter contemporary style conveyed more substantive information while using fewer words. Corporate communications reveal how clarity correlates with ethical behavior. Enron's notoriously opaque financial statements buried fraudulent activities beneath layers of jargon and convoluted explanations. Analysts who attempted to understand these documents encountered phrases like "recognition of fair value through mark-to-market accounting" that deliberately obscured straightforward accounting irregularities. By contrast, Warren Buffett's Berkshire Hathaway shareholder letters exemplify clarity in financial communication, explaining complex business operations in accessible language that respects readers' intelligence without assuming specialized knowledge. Legal writing represents perhaps the most resistant domain to clarity reforms. Studies of judicial opinions reveal median sentence lengths of 45 words, with some extending beyond 100 words. However, even here, change is possible. The U.S. Supreme Court's landmark Brown v. Board of Education decision, written by Chief Justice Earl Warren, deliberately employed straightforward language to ensure its reasoning would be accessible to all Americans. This clarity served not only communication purposes but also the decision's moral authority and cultural impact.

Chapter 6: Techniques for Organizing Ideas Coherently

Coherent organization transforms disconnected thoughts into persuasive communication. The foundation of this organization lies in identifying a clear controlling idea—whether thesis, hypothesis, or central claim—that governs the entire communication. This controlling idea acts as both compass and filter, guiding what to include and what to omit. Without this clarity of purpose, even well-written sentences fail to cohere into meaningful discourse. Effective communicators explicitly state this controlling idea early and reinforce it throughout their writing. Structural frameworks provide the architecture for coherent communication. The classic problem-solution structure works effectively for persuasive writing, while chronological organization suits narrative or historical content. Compare-contrast frameworks highlight meaningful differences, while process descriptions benefit from sequential organization. These structures are not merely formal conventions but cognitive scaffolds that support comprehension. Research demonstrates that readers encountering familiar organizational patterns comprehend information more quickly and retain it longer than when facing identical content in disorganized formats. Transitional devices serve as essential connective tissue between ideas. Beyond simple conjunctions, sophisticated transitions signal relationships between concepts: causal connections ("consequently," "therefore"), contrasts ("however," "conversely"), elaborations ("furthermore," "specifically"), or examples ("for instance," "to illustrate"). These linguistic signposts guide readers through complex reasoning. Strategic placement of these transitions—particularly at paragraph beginnings and endings—creates momentum that carries readers through difficult material. Information hierarchy represents another crucial organizational principle. Effective communicators distinguish between essential and supplementary information, giving prominence to the former. This hierarchy manifests in various ways: topic sentences that state key points before elaboration, executive summaries that precede detailed reports, or headlines that capture central ideas. Digital communication has intensified the importance of hierarchical organization, as readers increasingly scan rather than read linearly. Strategic use of headings, bullet points, and emphasized text accommodates this reading behavior while preserving substantive content. The principle of progressive disclosure governs how complex information should unfold. Rather than overwhelming readers with technical details initially, skilled communicators begin with accessible concepts and gradually introduce complexity. This approach resembles the journalistic inverted pyramid but extends beyond news writing to all forms of explanation. Scientific papers utilizing this principle begin with broadly accessible findings before proceeding to methodological details. Similarly, effective technical writing introduces conceptual frameworks before specific applications. This progressive disclosure respects both novice and expert readers by providing multiple entry points to the material.

Chapter 7: Beyond Clarity: Balancing Precision with Style

While clarity forms the foundation of effective communication, precision and style bring it to life. Precision extends beyond mere clarity—it involves selecting the exact words that capture nuanced meaning. Consider how "surge," "increase," "growth," and "expansion" all denote upward movement but carry distinct connotations. Precision requires an expansive vocabulary coupled with the judgment to select the most appropriate term for each context. This level of exactitude does not contradict clarity but rather enhances it by eliminating ambiguity and conveying subtle distinctions. Style encompasses the distinctive voice and rhythmic patterns that distinguish memorable writing from merely functional text. Contrary to common assumption, clarity and style are not opposing values but complementary ones. Metaphors and analogies, when aptly chosen, can illuminate complex concepts more effectively than literal explanations. Consider how understanding DNA as a "genetic code" or memory as "storage" provides conceptual frameworks that facilitate comprehension. Similarly, well-crafted narratives can make abstract principles concrete and memorable through the power of story. Rhythm plays an underappreciated role in effective communication. Varied sentence structures—alternating between short, declarative statements and more complex constructions—create a cadence that maintains reader engagement. This rhythmic variation prevents the monotony that often characterizes overly simplified writing. Consider how Abraham Lincoln's Gettysburg Address moves between concise declarations ("Four score and seven years ago") and more elaborate constructions to create its memorable cadence. This rhythmic quality makes the address not only clear but also resonant and memorable. Cultural context significantly influences both precision and style. Effective communicators recognize that language choices carry cultural associations that may enhance or impede comprehension for different audiences. Technical terminology appropriate for specialists becomes jargon when directed toward general audiences. Similarly, cultural references that illuminate meaning for one demographic may obscure it for others. Navigating these contextual considerations requires awareness of one's audience and adaptability in language choices. The balance between precision, style, and clarity ultimately depends on purpose and audience. Scientific papers rightfully prioritize terminological precision, while marketing materials emphasize engaging style. Journalistic writing balances both considerations, aiming for accuracy while maintaining reader interest. In each case, however, clarity remains the foundation upon which precision and style build. The most elegant prose fails if readers cannot discern its meaning, while the most precise terminology serves no purpose if it remains incomprehensible to its intended audience.

Summary

The pursuit of clarity in communication represents not merely a stylistic preference but an ethical imperative with profound implications for society. When we break through the information fog, we enable genuine understanding, facilitate informed decision-making, and foster meaningful dialogue across differences. The techniques and principles examined—from embracing active voice and concrete language to organizing ideas coherently—provide practical tools for achieving this clarity without sacrificing sophistication or depth. What emerges from this exploration is the recognition that clarity exists not in opposition to complexity but as its most effective vehicle. The most profound ideas throughout history have found expression in language accessible to their intended audiences. Einstein's theories revolutionized physics not only through their content but through his ability to articulate complex concepts in relatively straightforward terms. Similarly, great legal decisions, scientific breakthroughs, and philosophical insights achieve their impact precisely because they communicate clearly. When we commit to breaking through information fog, we do more than improve our writing—we honor the fundamental purpose of language itself: to connect minds through shared understanding.

About Author

Loading...

Harold Evans

Harold Evans is an English-born journalist and writer who was editor of the Sunday Times from 1967 to 1981. A graduate of Durham University, he has written a number of bestselling histories. He followed the late Alistair Cooke in commentaries on America for the BBC. An American citizen since 1993, he has held positions as editor-in-chief of the Atlantic Monthly Press, founding editor of the prize-winning Conde Nast Traveler; editorial director of the Atlantic and US News and the New York Daily News; and president and publisher of Random House. He holds the British Press Awards' Gold Award for Lifetime Achievement of Journalists. In 2001 British journalists voted him the all-time greatest British newspaper editor, and in 2004 he was knighted. Since 2011, he has been editor-at-large for Reuters.

Read more