Dogfight

Dogfight Plot Summary

Introduction

In January 2007, the tech world stood at the precipice of a revolution, though few recognized it at the time. When Steve Jobs took the stage at Macworld to introduce a new device that would "reinvent the phone," expectations were modest. The wireless carriers had long controlled the mobile industry with an iron grip, foiling innovators for years. Many thought this new device, more expensive yet arguably less capable than existing phones, was destined to fail. What followed was nothing short of transformative. The iPhone wasn't merely a phone—it was the first mainstream pocket computer that made calls. Its touchscreen interface, virtual keyboard, and revolutionary design changed not just how we communicate, but how humans interact with machines fundamentally. This innovation sparked a fierce competition between technology giants that would reshape our world. Through this rivalry, we witness not just a battle for market dominance, but a complete reimagining of computing, media consumption, and human connectivity. The competitive dynamic between these companies ultimately delivered a technology revolution that touches almost every corner of civilization today, with profound implications for business, society, and our daily lives.

Chapter 1: The iPhone: A Moonshot Mission (2007)

January 9, 2007 marked a watershed moment in technology history, though the full significance wouldn't be apparent for years. Andy Grignon, a senior engineer at Apple, was driving his Porsche Carrera along Highway 280 toward San Francisco, where his boss Steve Jobs would soon unveil the first iPhone. Despite being invited to this prestigious event, Grignon felt no excitement—only terror. After two and a half years of grueling work, the iPhone remained plagued with problems: it randomly dropped calls, lost internet connections, froze, and sometimes simply shut down. The iPhone project had stretched Apple's capabilities to their limits. Jobs had insisted on a device that seemed impossible: a phone with a full-size touchscreen, no physical keyboard, sophisticated software, and sleek design—all while maintaining decent battery life. Nothing like this had ever been successfully commercialized. The technology simply didn't exist, forcing Apple's team to create it from scratch. The multitouch screen alone required completely new manufacturing processes, as did the custom chips powering the device. Behind the scenes, internal politics complicated the already challenging technical work. Jobs had pitted two star executives—Tony Fadell and Scott Forstall—against each other in a fierce competition to see who could deliver the better product. The resulting tension rippled through the company, creating what one engineer called "religious war" conditions. Screaming matches in hallways became routine, engineers worked around the clock, and many began questioning whether Apple was still the counterculture underdog they had joined or had transformed into a soulless corporate machine. Against all odds, Jobs's demo went flawlessly that day. He showed off a device that could play music, display photos, make phone calls, send emails, and browse the full internet—not the watered-down mobile version that other phones offered. The audience watched in awe as he manipulated content with his fingers instead of buttons or a stylus, something previously relegated to science fiction. Though the demonstration units had been extensively rigged to hide their instability, with Apple engineers having installed special video cables and even hardcoded the phone to always show five signal bars, the public saw only magic. When the iPhone finally reached consumers on June 29, 2007, global media covered the launch as if a cultural phenomenon had arrived. Despite its $499 price tag and numerous limitations—no third-party apps, no copy-paste functionality, no video recording—consumers overlooked these shortcomings because of how revolutionary the overall experience felt. Apple had redefined what a phone could be, establishing the template for modern smartphones and setting the stage for a new computing paradigm. By creating a device that was simple enough for anyone to use yet powerful enough to transform how we interact with technology, Apple had launched what would prove to be more than just a product—it was the opening salvo in a technology revolution.

Chapter 2: Google's Android Gambit and Apple's Fury (2008-2009)

When Google's Android team watched Steve Jobs unveil the iPhone in 2007, their reaction was visceral. Chris DeSalvo, an Android engineer, recalled, "As a consumer I was blown away. I wanted one immediately. But as a Google engineer, I thought, 'We're going to have to start over.'" The Android project, which had been in development since Google's acquisition of Andy Rubin's startup in 2005, suddenly appeared outdated. The team had been working on a BlackBerry-style device with a physical keyboard, code-named "Sooner." Now they had to pivot rapidly toward a touchscreen device to compete. While Google scrambled to adjust its Android strategy, a surprising revelation complicated matters further: Google had been Apple's key partner on the iPhone, providing search, Maps, and YouTube functionality. Google CEO Eric Schmidt had even joined Jobs on stage during the iPhone announcement. The Android team hadn't known how deep this partnership went—some Google engineers working on iPhone projects had seen prototypes and knew intimate details about Apple's plans while the Android team worked in isolation. The tension exploded in the summer of 2008 when Jobs discovered Google was continuing Android development with features he believed copied the iPhone. He called an extraordinary meeting with Google executives including co-founder Larry Page and Android chief Andy Rubin, where Jobs unleashed his fury. According to attendees, Jobs issued an ultimatum: remove certain multitouch features from Android or face legal consequences. Google capitulated, temporarily removing functionalities like pinch-to-zoom from early Android phones. One senior Android engineer later revealed they displayed a sign in their office reading "STEVE JOBS STOLE MY LUNCH MONEY." The fallout was immediate. Though Schmidt remained on Apple's board, he began recusing himself from iPhone discussions. Jobs told his executive team that Google's "Don't Be Evil" motto was "bullshit." When the first Android phone—the T-Mobile G1—launched in September 2008, it was clearly a compromise, lacking many of the multitouch features that made the iPhone special. But the Android team persevered, partnering with manufacturers like HTC, Motorola and carriers like Verizon and T-Mobile who had been left out of the iPhone's exclusive arrangement with AT&T. By late 2009, the Android strategy had evolved into something formidable. Unlike Apple's tightly controlled approach, Google offered Android free to manufacturers, allowing them to customize it for their devices. The Motorola Droid, launched in November 2009 with an aggressive marketing campaign directly targeting the iPhone's perceived weaknesses, became Android's first major commercial success. When Google released its own Nexus One phone in January 2010, it restored the multitouch features Jobs had demanded be removed. Jobs's response was unequivocal. In a company town hall meeting, he declared, "We did not enter the search business. So why did Google enter the phone business? Google wants to kill the iPhone. We won't let them." His famous quote to biographer Walter Isaacson revealed the depth of his anger: "I will spend my last dying breath if I need to, and I will spend every penny of Apple's $40 billion in the bank, to right this wrong. I'm going to destroy Android, because it's a stolen product." What had begun as a partnership between Silicon Valley allies had devolved into a bitter rivalry that would define the next decade of technology.

Chapter 3: Platform Wars and Legal Battles (2010-2011)

By 2010, the smartphone landscape had transformed into a full-blown platform war reminiscent of the PC battles of the 1980s and 1990s. Apple's iOS and Google's Android were rapidly becoming the dominant mobile operating systems, with traditional powers like BlackBerry and Nokia struggling to respond. What made this rivalry particularly significant was that it wasn't just about hardware or software—it was about control of the emerging mobile ecosystem that would define how billions of people accessed information, entertainment, and services. Apple pursued a tightly integrated approach, controlling both hardware and software while curating a carefully managed App Store. This gave users a seamless, reliable experience but limited flexibility. Google countered with an open strategy, giving Android away for free to manufacturers while allowing more customization. By mid-2010, Android's market share was growing exponentially, with Google activating 300,000 new Android devices daily. An electronic poll at a Fortune technology conference asked, "Who will have the dominant smartphone in five years?" The results were telling: 57% picked Android; 37% picked iPhone. Jobs viewed this existential threat with growing alarm. In October 2010, he made a rare appearance on an earnings call to launch a scathing critique of Android's fragmentation: "We think Android is very, very fragmented and becoming more fragmented by the day. And as you know, Apple strives for the integrated model so the user isn't forced to be the systems integrator." Behind closed doors, his language was far more colorful, frequently referring to Android as a "stolen product" and Google executives as liars. The conflict escalated dramatically in the courts. Though Apple never sued Google directly, it launched patent infringement lawsuits against major Android manufacturers in multiple countries. The most significant was against Samsung, which had rapidly become the largest Android phone maker. Apple claimed Samsung had "slavishly copied" the iPhone's design and user interface. Samsung countersued, claiming Apple had infringed on its wireless technology patents. Similar legal battles erupted around the world, with injunctions temporarily blocking sales of various devices in Germany, Australia, and the Netherlands. The litigation represented more than just business competition—it reflected fundamentally different philosophies about innovation. Apple believed its designs and user interfaces deserved strict protection, while Google argued that no company should monopolize basic concepts like touchscreen gestures. This philosophical divide extended to consumers, who increasingly identified with one ecosystem or the other. The choice between iPhone and Android became almost tribal, similar to Mac versus PC in earlier decades. Behind the legal maneuvering, both companies were aggressively innovating. Apple released the iPhone 4 with its high-resolution "Retina" display, while Android manufacturers competed with larger screens and features like 4G connectivity that the iPhone lacked. The competition pushed both platforms forward at a remarkable pace, accelerating the adoption of smartphones worldwide. By the end of 2011, these devices had fundamentally changed how over a billion people communicated, consumed media, and accessed information—a transformation that would have been unimaginable just five years earlier.

Chapter 4: The iPad Revolution and Post-Jobs Era (2010-2012)

In January 2010, Steve Jobs unveiled the iPad, Apple's answer to Google's "Android everywhere" strategy. If Google would win on breadth, Apple would win on depth—creating an ecosystem of interconnected devices running the same software. The tablet computer was a category many had tried to create since the 1980s, with notable failures including Apple's own Newton. Conventional wisdom held that tablets were doomed to remain niche products. Jobs shattered these preconceptions with a device that weighed just 1.5 pounds, had 10 hours of battery life, and didn't require booting up. Most critically, it ran iPhone's iOS software, making it instantly familiar to millions. At $499, it was significantly cheaper than most laptops yet offered a revolutionary new computing experience centered around touch. The initial reaction from technology critics was surprisingly muted—many questioned what purpose it served between a phone and a laptop. Jobs himself admitted to his biographer that he was depressed by the initial reception: "I got about eight hundred email messages in the last twenty-four hours. Most of them are complaining." Those doubts quickly evaporated once the iPad reached consumers. Apple sold 450,000 units in the first week, 1 million in the first month, and 19 million in the first year. The device wasn't just a commercial success—it triggered seismic shifts across multiple industries. Publishers rushed to digitize their content, creating new forms of interactive books and magazines. Hollywood and television executives began reimagining video content for this new form factor. Software developers created thousands of applications specifically designed for the larger touch interface, generating billions in new revenue. The iPad's impact extended far beyond entertainment. Pilots replaced bulky flight manuals with iPads. Doctors began using them on hospital rounds. Schools incorporated them into curriculums for children as young as kindergarten. Businesses embraced them for their portability and ease of use, with 90% of Fortune 500 companies deploying them in some capacity by the end of 2011. The iPad had accomplished what decades of tablet efforts had failed to do—it had made computing truly personal and accessible to everyone. This revolution continued even as Apple faced its greatest challenge. On October 5, 2011, Steve Jobs died after a long battle with cancer. His passing raised profound questions about Apple's future. Jobs had been the company's visionary, famous for his meticulous attention to detail and his uncanny ability to anticipate what consumers would want. Could Apple maintain its creative edge without him? The company's new CEO, Tim Cook, faced not only this leadership transition but the continuing battle with Google's Android, which was making significant inroads in both smartphones and tablets. In the immediate aftermath of Jobs's death, Apple experienced a period of extraordinary growth. The company's market value doubled in the year following his passing, making it the most valuable company in history. The iPhone 4S and later the iPhone 5 continued to set sales records, while the iPad dominated the tablet market it had created. However, by late 2012, cracks began to appear. Apple's new Maps application, which replaced Google Maps on iOS devices, launched with significant problems. Samsung's Android phones were gaining popularity worldwide. The post-Jobs era had begun with remarkable success, but maintaining Apple's reputation for flawless execution and revolutionary innovation would prove increasingly challenging.

Chapter 5: Media Convergence: Mobile's Transformation of Content (2010-2013)

The mobile revolution initiated by the iPhone and accelerated by the iPad fundamentally transformed how media was created, distributed, and consumed. By 2010, what the industry had long called "convergence"—the merging of computing, communications, and content—was finally happening, though not in the way most had predicted. Rather than television or the desktop computer becoming the central hub, it was the mobile device in people's pockets and hands that was driving this transformation. For decades, media executives had attempted to anticipate and control convergence through corporate dealmaking, resulting in some of the worst mergers in business history—Time Warner's disastrous $164 billion merger with AOL being the most notorious example. The music industry had fought digital distribution through lawsuits rather than innovation, watching its revenues decline by 50% as a result. But by 2010, facing disruption on multiple fronts, media companies began to embrace the mobile platforms that Apple and Google had created. The iPad proved particularly transformative for publishing. Magazine companies like Time Inc. and Condé Nast initially resisted Apple's terms, especially concerns about losing control of their subscriber data. But they soon discovered that the majority of subscribers willingly shared their information, and the economics of digital distribution—eliminating printing and shipping costs—made the transition compelling. Newspapers, already struggling with declining print circulation, similarly embraced these platforms. Book publishers, despite concerns about Amazon's growing power, found that e-books expanded the overall market rather than simply cannibalizing print sales. Television experienced even more dramatic disruption. Cable companies like Time Warner Cable and Comcast created apps that allowed subscribers to watch TV anywhere on their tablets and phones. HBO launched HBO GO, giving subscribers access to every episode of every show it had ever produced. Meanwhile, technology companies began creating and distributing their own content. Netflix committed $100 million to produce "House of Cards," demonstrating that streaming services could create premium programming that rivaled traditional studios. YouTube, owned by Google, invested hundreds of millions in creating professional channels. This convergence wasn't limited to established media. New forms emerged that would have been impossible in the pre-mobile era. Startups like Flipboard reimagined how news and social media could be integrated in a magazine-like experience optimized for touch. The Atavist pioneered a new approach to long-form journalism enhanced with interactive elements. Social media platforms like Facebook and Twitter became crucial distribution channels, with media companies optimizing content specifically for mobile consumption on these platforms. The result was a fundamental restructuring of the media landscape. Content was no longer tied to specific devices or distribution channels. The same movie might be watched on a television via cable, on a tablet via Netflix, or on a smartphone via YouTube. Media companies that embraced this flexibility thrived, while those that resisted found themselves increasingly marginalized. By 2013, it was clear that mobile platforms had become the primary gateway to content for hundreds of millions of people worldwide, a shift that would only accelerate as smartphone adoption continued to spread globally.

Chapter 6: Samsung and the Fight for Market Dominance (2012-2013)

By 2012, the smartphone landscape had evolved into a duopoly, with Apple's iOS and Google's Android dominating the market. However, the composition of the Android side had changed dramatically. Samsung had emerged from the pack of manufacturers to become not just the largest maker of Android devices, but the iPhone's principal rival for market share and profits. This South Korean electronics giant, previously known primarily for televisions and household appliances, had transformed itself into a mobile powerhouse through aggressive innovation and marketing. Samsung's Galaxy S series of smartphones and Galaxy Tab tablets had become sleek, powerful devices that often introduced features before Apple, such as larger screens and 4G connectivity. Their success was remarkable—during some quarters in 2012, Samsung sold more smartphones than Apple. This success made Samsung the perfect target for Apple's accumulated legal frustration with Android. After years of preliminary skirmishes, the conflict culminated in a high-profile trial in San Jose Federal Court in the summer of 2012. The trial provided a rare glimpse into Apple's normally secretive operations. Top executives including marketing chief Phil Schiller and iOS software head Scott Forstall testified about the iPhone's development process. Industrial designer Christopher Stringer described the company's creative approach: "There is a table in the kitchen. It's where we're comfortable. It's where we are most familial. We throw ideas around and we—it's a brutally honest circle of debate." Apple's argument was straightforward: Samsung had "slavishly copied" the iPhone and iPad, from their rectangular shape with rounded corners to specific features like bounce-back scrolling and pinch-to-zoom. Samsung countered that Apple was attempting to patent basic shapes and functions necessary for any modern smartphone. The Korean company's lawyers argued that Apple had itself been inspired by earlier designs, pointing to Sony's influence on iPhone prototypes. After three weeks of testimony and just 22 hours of deliberation, the jury delivered a resounding victory for Apple, finding Samsung liable for infringement and awarding Apple over $1 billion in damages. Apple CEO Tim Cook declared, "Today values have won and I hope the whole world listens." The victory proved somewhat hollow, however. The legal process moved slowly, with appeals delaying any final resolution. Meanwhile, Samsung continued its remarkable growth, introducing new models and expanding its market share globally. More importantly, the underlying dynamics of the smartphone market remained unchanged. Android's open model allowed manufacturers to iterate quickly and address different market segments, while Apple maintained its focus on premium devices with higher profit margins. This period also saw significant shifts in the relationship between Google and Samsung. As Samsung became the dominant Android manufacturer, accounting for nearly half of all Android phone sales, its negotiating power increased. Samsung began developing its own software and services that competed with Google's offerings, raising concerns that it might "fork" Android and create its own ecosystem. In response, Google purchased Motorola Mobility for $12.5 billion in 2012, acquiring both a valuable patent portfolio and the ability to produce its own smartphones if necessary. By 2013, the mobile revolution had matured from its disruptive beginnings to a stable ecosystem that was fundamentally reshaping global technology. Apple and Google had established platforms that connected billions of people to information, entertainment, and each other in unprecedented ways. Though their bitter rivalry continued, both companies had achieved remarkable success—transforming not just their own businesses but the entire technological landscape. The smartphone had become the primary computing device for much of humanity, a development that would have seemed unimaginable when Jobs first unveiled the iPhone just six years earlier.

Summary

The epic rivalry between Apple and Google represents far more than a corporate battle—it stands as one of the most transformative technological competitions in history. What began as a partnership between Silicon Valley allies evolved into a fierce struggle that accelerated innovation at an unprecedented pace. Through their competition, these companies fundamentally reimagined computing, transforming phones from simple communication devices into the primary gateway through which billions of people experience the digital world. The contrasting approaches—Apple's integrated, curated ecosystem versus Google's open, widely distributed platform—created a dynamic tension that pushed both companies to continuous improvement. This technological revolution offers profound lessons for understanding innovation and competition. First, truly transformative change often comes from reimagining existing categories rather than creating entirely new ones—smartphones existed before the iPhone, but Apple fundamentally reconceived what they could be. Second, competition, even bitter rivalry, can benefit consumers and society through accelerated innovation. The need to respond to each other's advances pushed both companies to improve their products at a pace neither would have maintained alone. Finally, platforms matter more than products—both companies succeeded by creating ecosystems that connected developers, content creators, and users in powerful networks. As we look toward future technological revolutions, whether in artificial intelligence, transportation, or virtual reality, these lessons from the mobile revolution will continue to provide valuable insight into how transformative change occurs and how it reshapes our world.

About Author

Loading...

Fred Vogelstein

I'm a contributing editor for Wired magazine in San Francisco. I've been a business and technology journalist here, in New York City, New Haven and Los Angeles for more than two decades. Before Wired I was on staff at Fortune magazine, US News & World Report, the Wall Street Journal, and New York Newsday. I've also written for The New York Times Magazine, the Washington Post, and the Los Angeles Times. I'm from New York City. I studied political science at Pomona College in Los Angeles. I have half an MBA from Columbia University, which I received as a Knight-Bagehot Fellow.

Read more