Drive

Drive Plot Summary

Introduction

On a crisp autumn morning in 1949, a young scientist named Harry Harlow made an unexpected discovery that would challenge everything we thought we knew about human motivation. While studying learning behaviors in rhesus monkeys at the University of Wisconsin, Harlow noticed something peculiar. When he placed mechanical puzzles in their cages, the monkeys began solving them with enthusiasm and determination—without any external rewards. This flew in the face of conventional wisdom, which held that behavior was driven primarily by biological urges or external rewards and punishments. Yet here were these creatures, engaging in complex problem-solving simply because they found it inherently satisfying. Fast forward to the 1970s, when another researcher named Edward Deci conducted a similar experiment with humans. He observed college students working on interesting puzzles, some offered money for solving them, others not. Surprisingly, those promised rewards became less interested in the puzzles over time, while the unpaid participants maintained their enthusiasm. This revelation pointed to a powerful third drive beyond our biological needs and response to rewards—an intrinsic motivation that comes from within. This third drive—our deep-seated desire for autonomy, mastery, and purpose—forms the foundation of human motivation that science understands but business often ignores. The gap between what science knows and what organizations do has created a mismatch that undermines performance, creativity, and fulfillment in our professional and personal lives.

Chapter 1: The Puzzle of Human Motivation

Imagine it's 1995 and you're sitting with an accomplished economist. You present her with a crystal ball showing two future encyclopedias—one created by Microsoft with paid professionals and managers, the other built by unpaid volunteers writing and editing for fun. You ask which will be more successful in fifteen years. Any rational economist would choose Microsoft's encyclopedia without hesitation. The incentives were clear: Microsoft had money, professional talent, and market dominance. The volunteer project had no financial incentives whatsoever. Yet by 2009, Microsoft's Encarta was discontinued while Wikipedia had become the largest and most popular encyclopedia in the world. This outcome defies traditional economic logic. How could unpaid amateurs outperform paid professionals? The answer lies in what psychologists call intrinsic motivation—the desire to do something because it's inherently interesting, challenging, and absorbing. This Wikipedia phenomenon isn't isolated. Look at the open-source software movement, where programmers write code for free, creating products like Linux and Firefox that compete successfully against commercial alternatives. Studies of these communities reveal that participants are motivated primarily by the joy of creation, the satisfaction of solving problems, and the desire to contribute to something meaningful—not by financial rewards. Our conventional understanding of motivation—what I call Motivation 2.0—assumes that humans respond primarily to rewards and punishments. This carrot-and-stick approach worked reasonably well for routine, algorithmic work of the 20th century. But today's economy increasingly values creative, conceptual work—what psychologists call "heuristic" rather than "algorithmic" tasks. And for this type of work, the old motivational model is not merely ineffective; it's often counterproductive. The mismatch between what science knows about motivation and what business does creates a gap that undermines performance. While behavioral scientists have been documenting the power of intrinsic motivation for decades, many organizations still operate on outdated assumptions about what drives human behavior. Closing this gap requires a new operating system for our businesses and personal lives—one based on the human need for autonomy, mastery, and purpose.

Chapter 2: Carrots and Sticks: The Old Model's Limitations

In Mark Twain's classic story "The Adventures of Tom Sawyer," young Tom faces the dreary task of whitewashing his Aunt Polly's fence on a beautiful Saturday morning. When his friend Ben comes by and mocks him for having to work, Tom has a stroke of genius. He pretends that painting the fence isn't work at all but a rare privilege. Soon, Ben is begging for a turn, even offering his prized apple for the opportunity. Before long, all the neighborhood boys are paying Tom for the chance to paint, while he sits in the shade, collecting treasures. This scene brilliantly illustrates what psychologists now call the "Sawyer Effect"—how external rewards can transform an enjoyable activity into a chore, or conversely, how framing a task as a privilege can make it desirable. In the 1970s, psychologist Mark Lepper demonstrated this effect scientifically. He observed preschoolers who enjoyed drawing and divided them into three groups. The first group was told they'd receive a certificate with ribbon if they drew pictures. The second group received the same reward unexpectedly after drawing. The third group was neither promised nor given any reward. Two weeks later, the researchers observed the children during free play. Those who had been promised rewards showed significantly less interest in drawing than before. The unexpected-reward and no-reward groups maintained their original level of interest. The conclusion was striking: contingent rewards—"if you do this, then you'll get that"—had undermined the children's intrinsic motivation. The reward had transformed play into work. This finding isn't limited to children. When researchers tested adults with monetary incentives for solving creative problems, they discovered something counterintuitive: higher rewards led to worse performance. In one study conducted in India, participants performing tasks requiring cognitive skill did poorer when offered larger financial incentives. The pressure of the reward actually impaired their ability to think creatively and solve problems. The science is clear: traditional "if-then" rewards can extinguish intrinsic motivation, diminish performance, crush creativity, and crowd out good behavior. They can also encourage unethical behavior, create addictions, and foster short-term thinking. These aren't anomalies; they're predictable side effects of relying too heavily on extrinsic motivators. When rewards become the primary goal, people often take the shortest path to acquiring them—even if that path is unethical or ultimately counterproductive. This doesn't mean all rewards are harmful or that money doesn't matter. Baseline compensation—paying people enough to take the issue of money off the table—remains essential. But once that threshold is met, the focus should shift to the elements that truly drive high performance in today's workplace: autonomy, mastery, and purpose.

Chapter 3: Autonomy: The Desire to Direct Our Own Lives

It's a little past noon on a rainy Friday in Charlottesville, Virginia, and only a third of CEO Jeff Gunther's employees have shown up for work. But Gunther isn't worried. In fact, he's perfectly calm. That's because his company, Meddius, operates as a ROWE—a Results-Only Work Environment—where employees have complete autonomy over when, where, and how they work. The only thing that matters is results. "Management isn't about walking around and seeing if people are in their offices," Gunther explains. "It's about creating conditions for people to do their best work." When he implemented ROWE at the beginning of the year, people were initially hesitant to embrace this freedom. But after a few weeks, most found their groove. Productivity rose. Stress declined. And while two employees struggled with the autonomy and left, the rest thrived. This approach to work represents a fundamental shift from the command-and-control model that dominated the 20th century. Autonomy—our desire to be self-directed—is one of the key elements of intrinsic motivation. Research shows that autonomous motivation promotes greater conceptual understanding, better grades, enhanced persistence, higher productivity, less burnout, and greater psychological well-being. Companies around the world are discovering the power of autonomy in different ways. The Australian software company Atlassian holds "FedEx Days"—24-hour periods when engineers can work on anything they want, with whomever they want, however they want. The only requirement is that they must deliver something overnight (hence the name "FedEx"). These autonomous bursts of creativity have produced numerous innovations and improvements to the company's products. Google famously allows engineers to spend 20 percent of their time working on projects of their own choosing. This policy has led to some of the company's most successful products, including Gmail, Google News, and Google Talk. The company 3M has had a similar policy since the 1950s—it's called the "15 percent rule"—which gave birth to innovations like Post-it Notes. Autonomy extends beyond just how we allocate our time. True autonomy encompasses at least four aspects of work: what people do (task), when they do it (time), how they do it (technique), and with whom they do it (team). Organizations that support autonomy in these four dimensions often see remarkable results. Studies show that companies that give workers greater autonomy grow at four times the rate of control-oriented firms and have one-third the turnover. The most fundamental aspect of autonomy might be our time. Without sovereignty over our time, it's nearly impossible to have autonomy over our lives. That's why Results-Only Work Environments represent such a radical departure from traditional management. As ROWE co-creator Cali Ressler puts it, "In the past, work was defined primarily by putting in time, and secondarily on getting results. We need to flip that model."

Chapter 4: Mastery: The Urge to Make Progress and Create Value

In 1944, ten-year-old Mihaly Csikszentmihalyi stood on a train platform in Budapest, Hungary, as bombs exploded in the distance. His family was fleeing the chaos of World War II, and amid the terror of that moment, young Mihaly had a realization: "It struck me that grown-ups had really no idea how to live," he recalled decades later. This childhood observation sparked a lifelong quest to understand what makes life worth living. Years later, as a psychology professor, Csikszentmihalyi began studying people who were so engaged in activities they loved that they seemed to enter a different state of being. Rock climbers, chess players, surgeons, and artists described similar experiences when deeply immersed in their work: time seemed to disappear, self-consciousness vanished, and they felt both challenged and capable. Csikszentmihalyi called this state "flow"—a condition of complete absorption in an optimally challenging activity. To study this phenomenon, he developed an innovative research method. He equipped participants with electronic pagers and beeped them at random intervals throughout the day, asking them to record what they were doing and how they felt. The results were surprising. People reported experiencing flow most often at work, not during leisure time. When engaged in activities that stretched their abilities—not too easy, not too hard, but just right—people found deep satisfaction regardless of external rewards. This "Goldilocks principle" of challenge is essential for mastery. Tasks that are too simple lead to boredom; those that are too difficult create anxiety. But those in the sweet spot—what Csikszentmihalyi calls "optimal experiences"—lead to growth and enjoyment. Companies like Swedish logistics firm Green Cargo have redesigned their management practices around this principle, training managers to help employees find this sweet spot of challenge. After implementing these flow-friendly policies, the company became profitable for the first time in 125 years. But mastery isn't just about finding flow in the moment. It's a longer journey that follows three peculiar laws. First, mastery is a mindset—it requires seeing your abilities not as fixed traits but as qualities you can develop through effort. Stanford psychologist Carol Dweck calls this a "growth mindset" as opposed to a "fixed mindset." Second, mastery is painful—it demands deliberate practice, grit, and perseverance through plateaus and setbacks. And third, mastery is an asymptote—you can approach it but never fully reach it, which makes it both frustrating and endlessly alluring. The implications for motivation are profound. External rewards might get people to perform routine tasks, but they do little to foster the deep engagement needed for mastery. True mastery requires intrinsic motivation—the desire to get better at something that matters. And when organizations create conditions that support this drive, both the individuals and the enterprise flourish.

Chapter 5: Purpose: The Yearning for Meaning in Our Work

In 2006, the first members of the baby-boom generation began turning sixty. As they contemplated their remaining decades, many asked themselves: "When am I going to do something that matters? When am I going to live my best life? When am I going to make a difference in the world?" This demographic shift—millions of people simultaneously questioning the meaning of their lives—is creating what might be called a "purpose revolution." We're seeing evidence of this revolution in the emergence of new business models that blend profit with purpose. Take TOMS Shoes, founded by young entrepreneur Blake Mycoskie. For every pair of shoes the company sells, it gives another pair to a child in a developing country. Is TOMS a charity that finances itself through shoe sales, or a business that sacrifices earnings to do good? It's neither and both—what the company calls "a for-profit with giving at its core." This blurring of traditional categories reflects a deeper shift in how people think about work and business. The old operating system—Motivation 2.0—treated purpose as ornamental, a nice accessory as long as it didn't interfere with the real business of maximizing profit. The new operating system—Motivation 3.0—places purpose at its center, recognizing that humans naturally seek meaning and contribution beyond themselves. Even traditional businesses are beginning to acknowledge this shift. When a group of Harvard Business School students created "The MBA Oath" in 2009—a pledge to "serve the greater good" and create "sustainable economic, social, and environmental prosperity"—nearly a quarter of the graduating class signed on. These weren't the words of idealistic dreamers but of future business leaders who recognized that purpose maximization could be as important as profit maximization. The science supports this intuition. Researchers followed college graduates into their careers and found that those with "profit goals" (to become wealthy or famous) who achieved those goals were no happier than when they were students. In fact, they showed increases in anxiety and depression. By contrast, those with "purpose goals" (to help others or learn) who achieved their aims reported higher levels of satisfaction and well-being. As Edward Deci, one of the pioneers in motivation research, explains: "The typical notion is this: You value something. You attain it. Then you're better off as a function of it. But what we find is that there are certain things that if you value and if you attain them, you're worse off as a result of it, not better off." Pursuing wealth and fame often comes at the expense of autonomy, mastery, and purpose—the very things that make life satisfying. This doesn't mean profit doesn't matter. It does. But treating profit as the primary purpose of business is like treating oxygen as the primary purpose of life. We need oxygen to survive, but we don't live to breathe. Similarly, businesses need profits to sustain themselves, but the most successful ones exist to accomplish something more meaningful than quarterly returns.

Chapter 6: The New Operating System for Business and Personal Success

When we examine the landscape of human motivation, we find ourselves at a critical juncture. The old operating system—built around external rewards and punishments—is increasingly incompatible with how work gets done in the 21st century. The new system—organized around our intrinsic motivation to direct our own lives (autonomy), to improve at something that matters (mastery), and to contribute to a larger purpose—offers a more accurate account of who we are as human beings. Consider the remarkable story of Wikipedia again. Its success defies traditional economic logic. Thousands of people spend countless hours creating and editing articles for no financial gain. They do it because they have autonomy over their contributions, they enjoy the challenge of crafting excellent entries, and they believe in the purpose of creating a free encyclopedia for everyone on the planet. This combination of autonomy, mastery, and purpose proves extraordinarily motivating. We see similar patterns in organizations that have embraced this new operating system. At Zappos, the online shoe retailer, customer service representatives don't follow scripts or have their calls timed. They have the autonomy to handle customer interactions however they see fit, with the goal of creating an exceptional experience. The result? Zappos consistently ranks as one of the best companies for customer service, ahead of luxury brands like Cadillac and Apple. At Best Buy headquarters, the Results-Only Work Environment has increased productivity by 35% while reducing voluntary turnover significantly. Employees report better relationships with family and friends, more company loyalty, and greater focus and energy. They've stopped counting hours because they're focused on results that matter. The science behind these success stories is robust. Decades of research in behavioral psychology, organizational sociology, and neuroscience confirm that human beings are not merely responding to external incentives. We are naturally curious, self-directed, and purpose-seeking creatures. When these intrinsic drives are liberated, people achieve more and live richer lives. This doesn't mean abandoning all external rewards. Baseline compensation—paying people enough to take money off the table as a concern—remains essential. But beyond that threshold, the emphasis should shift to creating conditions where intrinsic motivation can flourish: providing meaningful choice, offering challenges that stretch but don't overwhelm, and connecting individual efforts to larger purposes. The implications extend beyond business to education, parenting, and personal development. Schools that nurture autonomy, mastery, and purpose produce more engaged learners. Parenting approaches that support these intrinsic drives raise more capable, self-directed children. And individuals who organize their lives around these principles tend to be more satisfied and productive.

Chapter 7: Type I Behavior: Building a Motivation 3.0 World

In the mid-20th century, cardiologist Meyer Friedman identified what he called "Type A" behavior—a pattern characterized by excessive competitiveness, impatience, and hostility that increased the risk of heart disease. By contrast, "Type B" individuals were more relaxed and less driven by external validation. This simple alphabetic distinction helped millions understand a complex set of behaviors and their consequences. In a similar vein, we can distinguish between two motivational patterns: "Type X" (extrinsic) and "Type I" (intrinsic). Type X behavior is fueled primarily by external rewards and the desire for recognition from others. Type I behavior is driven more by intrinsic desires—the inherent satisfaction of the activity itself, the opportunity for growth, and the connection to something larger. Type I behavior isn't born; it's made. Our natural tendency toward curiosity and self-direction can be either nurtured or suppressed by our environments. When organizations, schools, and families support autonomy, mastery, and purpose, Type I behavior flourishes. When they rely heavily on controlling mechanisms like rigid schedules, surveillance, and contingent rewards, they produce more Type X behavior. The good news is that anyone can become more Type I. It's not a permanent personality trait but a way of thinking and behaving that can be developed. And the benefits are substantial. Type I's almost always outperform Type X's in the long run. While an intense focus on external rewards might deliver quick results, this approach is difficult to sustain and doesn't support the deep engagement necessary for enduring achievement. This doesn't mean Type I's disdain money or recognition. They care about fair compensation and appreciate acknowledgment for their work. But once baseline needs are met, these external factors recede in importance. For Type I's, the primary motivators become autonomy over their work, the opportunity to grow in mastery, and connection to a meaningful purpose. Companies like Gore Associates (makers of GORE-TEX fabric) embody these principles. At Gore, there are no formal job titles. Employees commit to projects rather than being assigned to them. Leaders emerge naturally when others choose to follow them. This radical autonomy has helped Gore remain innovative and profitable for over 50 years, earning a place on Fortune's "100 Best Companies to Work For" list every year since the ranking began. The shift from Type X to Type I represents more than just a change in management technique. It's a fundamental reorientation of how we think about human motivation and potential. By aligning our organizations, schools, and personal lives with our intrinsic drives, we can close the gap between what science knows and what we do. We can create environments where people thrive rather than merely comply. The most successful organizations of the future will be those that understand this essential truth: human beings are not merely smaller, slower, better-smelling horses galloping after carrots or fleeing from sticks. We are designed to be active and engaged, to exercise control over our lives, to learn and create, and to do things that matter. When we honor this truth, we tap into a powerful and renewable source of motivation that benefits individuals, organizations, and society as a whole.

Summary

The journey through motivation science reveals a profound truth: the traditional carrot-and-stick approach that has dominated business and education for decades is increasingly at odds with both human nature and the demands of modern work. The research is clear—external rewards can diminish intrinsic motivation, reduce creativity, and lead to short-term thinking. Yet many organizations continue to rely on if-then incentives as their primary motivational tool, creating a gap between what science knows and what business does. The path forward lies in embracing what truly drives human behavior: our innate needs for autonomy, mastery, and purpose. When people have freedom over their tasks, time, technique, and team, they engage more deeply with their work. When they have opportunities to develop mastery in areas that matter to them, they persist through challenges and find satisfaction in progress. And when they connect their efforts to a purpose larger than themselves, they bring more energy and commitment to everything they do. Organizations like Atlassian, Gore Associates, and Zappos have demonstrated that building environments around these principles leads to better performance, greater innovation, and more fulfilling work lives. The most powerful lesson from the science of motivation isn't just about organizational design—it's about human potential. By aligning our businesses, schools, and personal lives with our intrinsic drives, we don't just perform better; we live better. We move from compliance to engagement, from control to autonomy, and from profit to purpose. This isn't just good business—it's a more accurate and humane understanding of who we are and what we're capable of becoming.

About Author

Loading...

Daniel H. Pink

Read more

Related Books by Daniel H. Pink

Loading...

The Power of Regret

Daniel H. Pink

How Looking Backward Moves us Forward

★★★★½4.6