Equity

Equity Plot Summary

Introduction

In today's complex and diverse world, organizations face the critical challenge of creating environments where everyone can genuinely flourish regardless of their background, identity, or circumstances. The traditional approaches to equality often fall short because they fail to recognize that providing the same treatment to everyone doesn't address underlying systemic barriers. Equity, as a framework, acknowledges these differences and provides pathways to ensure fair access to opportunities. This exploration delves into the crucial distinction between equality and equity, examining how organizations can move beyond superficial diversity initiatives to create truly inclusive environments through intentional design. By addressing systemic biases, embracing differences as strengths, and reimagining organizational structures, we can build workplaces that allow all individuals to contribute meaningfully and thrive authentically. The journey requires engaged leadership, observable behaviors, effective communication strategies, and a deep understanding of how systems either enable or inhibit equitable outcomes. These principles extend beyond workplace walls, influencing how organizations present themselves to the world through media and marketing, ultimately contributing to a more equitable society.

Chapter 1: The Foundations of Equity: Beyond Equality to Fairness

Equity represents a fundamental shift from simply treating everyone the same to ensuring everyone has what they need to thrive. This distinction is crucial - equality provides everyone with identical resources regardless of their starting point, while equity acknowledges different needs and distributes resources accordingly. The image of three people of different heights trying to see over a fence perfectly illustrates this concept: equality gives everyone the same size box to stand on, but equity provides different sized boxes so everyone can see over the fence. The concept of equity has deep roots in English law, where it was developed to supplement common and statute law to protect rights and enforce duties fixed by substantive law. This legal foundation highlights an important aspect of equity - it allows societies to honor the spirit of the law rather than merely following its letter. Essentially, equity recognizes that those with power must exercise discretion when making decisions to ensure fairness, especially when rigid application of rules would produce unjust outcomes. In organizational contexts, equity means designing systems, cultures, and structures so that everyone has an equal chance to succeed, however they define success. It doesn't fault people for being different; it makes room for difference and then leverages it as a strength. This approach recognizes our interdependence and uses our collective power to create environments where everyone can thrive and contribute their unique strengths. Creating equitable organizations requires three essential preconditions. First, differences between individuals and groups must be valued, not demonized or minimized. Second, people with power need to see systems and understand how these systems influence opportunities for others. Third, those with power must be willing to use their influence to create more opportunities so everyone can thrive while maintaining their authentic differences. The pathway to equity isn't about designing a utopian workplace. Life will always contain inherent unfairness, but the greatest expression of our humanity lies in creating fairness within our sphere of influence. Equity represents a virtue that leads us to a higher expression of our true nature - it's how we embrace interdependence and design systems that work as well for others as they do for ourselves.

Chapter 2: Systems and Bias: How Inequality is Designed

Implicit bias permeates everything we do, including how we design systems. These biases occur when our minds automatically associate certain stimuli with particular thoughts, feelings, and behaviors. While bias can sometimes serve as a positive time-saver, it becomes detrimental when our associations are based on stereotypes or inaccurate information. Most significantly, when bias is backed by power, it transforms into various forms of discrimination and oppression - racism, sexism, xenophobia, homophobia, transphobia, Islamophobia, ableism, and more. In American society, most individuals have been collectively programmed to think of the "default" human being as white, male, straight, able-bodied, in early or mid-adulthood, Christian, and upper-middle class. This implicit programming leads to systems, processes, organizations, products, and laws designed primarily for this "prototypical" individual. Everyone else becomes categorized as "other," creating a fundamental inequality that perpetuates despite surface-level efforts toward diversity. Systems of inequality haven't emerged accidentally - they were deliberately designed. The United States, for example, was established on a system designed to advantage white, straight, able-bodied, Christian men with property. Over centuries, these systems have undergone iterative designs to maintain power imbalances: Indigenous peoples were racialized "subtractively" through blood quantum requirements that ensured eventual population decimation; Black people were racialized "expansively" through the "one drop" rule to multiply the enslaved workforce; and the Thirteenth Amendment ended slavery based on race but continued to allow it based on criminality, leading to mass incarceration of Black and Brown people. These systemic designs rest on the central myth of rugged individualism - the idea that success comes solely from personal effort. This belief makes it difficult to recognize how systems create inequitable outcomes. For instance, the American education system tied to local property taxes perpetuates educational disparities, while financial systems maintain racial wealth divides. When we fail to see these systemic factors, we end up blaming individuals for circumstances largely beyond their control. Designing equitable organizations requires understanding these systemic biases and working to counteract them through intentional design. This means recognizing that equity cannot be achieved through tokenistic diversity initiatives or superficial inclusion efforts. Instead, it requires fundamentally reimagining organizational structures to center those who have historically been marginalized, identifying observable behaviors that promote equity, and redesigning systems to support those behaviors. The good news is that just as systems have been designed for inequity, they can be redesigned for equity. This process starts with engaged leadership willing to examine power dynamics, continues with defining equitable outcomes, and culminates in redesigning organizational systems to support those outcomes. Throughout this journey, effective change communications help generate buy-in and reduce resistance to inclusion, diversity, equity, and accessibility initiatives.

Chapter 3: Human-Centered Design for Inclusive Organizations

Human-centered design (HCD) offers a powerful methodology for creating more equitable organizations by placing people's needs at the center of the design process. While HCD has sometimes been criticized for lacking diversity among designers (a 2019 AIGA survey found that 71% of designers identify as White/Caucasian), the approach itself provides valuable tools for addressing inequity when applied thoughtfully and inclusively. The traditional HCD process includes five key practices: empathize, define, ideate, prototype, and test. The empathy phase is crucial but often misunderstood. True empathy isn't merely about connecting with others or imagining yourself in their shoes—a practice known as perspective-taking. Rather, effective empathy requires perspective-gathering: actively asking people about their experiences instead of presuming to understand them. This distinction is vital because perspective-taking can actually reinforce stereotypes and lead to inaccurate assumptions, especially in matters regarding race, gender, and other aspects of identity. When defining problems in HCD, practitioners typically frame challenges as "How might we..." questions. For equity-focused work, these questions should point toward specific equitable outcomes: "How might we ensure that there are as many people of color in leadership positions as there are in the company as a whole?" The bridge between these outcomes and measurable results is observable behaviors—specific actions that can be encouraged and measured within the organization. A critical addition to the standard HCD model is diagnosing obstacles to desired behaviors. These obstacles typically fall into three categories: insufficient motivation (people don't feel inspired to change), insufficient direction (people don't know how to change), or insufficient bandwidth (people lack the time or mental capacity to change). Each obstacle requires different solutions—from creating experiences that help people feel the need for change to providing clear guidelines or removing systemic barriers. The ideation phase invites creative brainstorming to generate potential solutions. This process should be guided by established rules that encourage wild ideas, ban judgment during the brainstorm, build on others' ideas, and aim for quantity over immediate quality. The prototyping phase then allows organizations to test potential solutions before full implementation. This step requires making difficult choices about which ideas to pursue, remembering that focusing is about saying "no" to many good options to prioritize the most promising ones. Throughout the design process, practitioners must remain mindful of power dynamics. Power, defined as the ability to make a difference in the world, can be used either to oppress and exclude or to liberate and include. Designers must adopt a liberatory approach to power that views differences as strengths, embraces interdependence, and creates conditions for everyone to thrive. This requires awareness of the qualities of inclusive power: empowerment, conflict competence, respect, fairness, approachability, discretion, and judiciousness. By combining human-centered design with behavior change principles and a deep understanding of power dynamics, organizations can create sustainable solutions to inclusion, diversity, equity, and accessibility challenges that work with human nature rather than against it.

Chapter 4: Engaged Leadership: Valuing Difference and Seeing Systems

Engaged leadership forms the foundation for designing equitable organizations. These leaders willingly use their power and influence to redesign systems so everyone has equal access to opportunity. They go beyond established "best practices," take time to listen to others, and constantly question their assumptions and beliefs. Most importantly, they develop comfort with difference, seeing unity in diversity rather than insisting everyone fit into a mold of the "ideal" employee or leader. The journey toward equitable leadership begins with learning to value difference. While our brains are wired to feel threatened by difference, leaders can develop what researchers call an "intercultural mindset" that moves beyond mere tolerance. This progression starts from monocultural mindsets (denying differences or engaging in polarization) toward intercultural ones (accepting and adapting to differences). At the acceptance stage, leaders embrace cultural and group differences and explore how these differences can contribute to the collective good. With adaptation, they alter their behavior according to cultural context and abandon the notion that there's only one right way to do things. Equitable leaders also cultivate "system sight" - the ability to see systems and understand interdependence. A powerful tool for developing this awareness is the Group Identity Wheel, which positions personal identity in relation to systems and power. This exercise asks individuals to map various dimensions of their identity (race, age, gender, etc.) and mark whether each is a historically centered or marginalized group. The process reveals how certain aspects of identity are more salient than others in daily life, usually because marginalized identities require more awareness as a protective factor. Understanding both marginalization and privilege is vital for equitable leadership. Leaders must recognize how systems support them through certain aspects of their identity while creating barriers through others. For instance, a woman of color might benefit from educational privilege while facing barriers due to gender and race. This awareness allows leaders to use their privilege strategically to lift up voices that may struggle to be heard. Perhaps most transformative is how equitable leaders rewrite their personal narratives about success. The myth of the self-made individual remains one of the most pernicious barriers to equity work. Equitable leaders break this silence by transparently acknowledging the system, their privilege, and the support they received from others in their journey. This storytelling approach doesn't diminish their achievements but rather conveys a deeper sense of humility while making the invisible system visible to others. What does this look like in practice? When Bob Etris and Jack Moore, managing partners at Evans Consulting, committed to advancing equity in their organization, they demonstrated exceptional courage in examining their own privileges and sharing their insights with employees. During a company retreat, they spoke candidly about how the rules of society had benefited them as straight, white men and how equity work was not just good business but "the just, the right, the moral, the responsible thing to do." Their vulnerability and willingness to acknowledge systemic advantages exemplified how engaged leadership can create space for meaningful organizational change.

Chapter 5: Implementing Equity Through Observable Behaviors

Moving from awareness to impact requires a bridge - observable behaviors that transform abstract equity concepts into tangible actions. These behaviors provide the practical pathway to creating more equitable organizations, especially when they're embedded into systems and processes. The process begins by centering people who have historically been pushed to the margins, gathering their perspectives either formally through assessments or informally through conversations and feedback. National Public Radio (NPR) exemplifies this approach in their work to diversify news sources. When data revealed a significant drop in source diversity, leadership established a clear, measurable outcome: to return to their previous high-water mark where 27% of sources were people of color. Through multiple conversations with news managers and diversity leaders, they identified a critical observable behavior: "By the end of 2020, every journalist is tracking source diversity." This simple, measurable action provided a concrete step toward their broader equity goal. The implementation process faced challenges - news managers operated under constant deadline pressure with limited time for new initiatives. The solution emerged by identifying "bright spots" - news managers who were already tracking source diversity. These early adopters shared their methods during lunchtime meetings, demonstrating various approaches: one manager shared a spreadsheet tracking system, another played a clip of asking sources about their identity, while a third explained using Slack for post-segment tracking. By offering a diversity of tools rather than a one-size-fits-all solution, NPR gave journalists permission to adopt or adapt methods that worked for their specific circumstances. Observable behaviors must be reinforced by organizational systems to be effective. At NPR, they discovered that their culture of prioritizing deadlines above all else discouraged reporters from finding diverse sources. This insight led to discussions about amending performance review processes and holding news managers accountable for source tracking. Similarly, organizations claiming to want more women in leadership might need to examine whether frat-house perks or open floor plans (which research shows can make women feel more vulnerable to harassment) undermine their stated goals. The most sustainable equity solutions work invisibly through what behavioral economists call "nudges" - ways of presenting choices that encourage people to select options aligned with equity goals while preserving their freedom to choose. Unlike novelty-based approaches that quickly lose effectiveness, good nudges operate below conscious awareness: hospital rooms with patient names clearly displayed on whiteboards to ensure all staff address them personally; onboarding processes that automatically opt new employees into implicit bias training while allowing them to opt out; or video conference software that adds people's pronouns to their display names. Technology plays a major role in creating equitable organizations but requires careful attention to embedded biases. "Unethical patterns" in digital interfaces can trick users and eliminate choice, while algorithmic bias in AI and machine learning can perpetuate discrimination in hiring and other processes. Organizations committed to equity must take a mindful approach to selecting, designing, and redesigning their technological infrastructure to ensure it advances rather than undermines equity goals.

Chapter 6: Effective Communication to Drive Organizational Change

Effectively communicating about inclusion, diversity, equity, and accessibility initiatives is essential for generating organizational buy-in. However, this communication requires more than good intentions - it demands strategic approaches grounded in behavior change science and an understanding of how people process information about difference and equity. Language matters in equity communications, but sentence structure matters even more. Isabel Wilkerson's metaphor from her book "Caste" is illuminating: "If race is language, caste is grammar." Word choice is important, but the underlying structure of thoughts - how we construct sentences about different groups - reveals our deeper beliefs. Someone might use inclusive terminology while constructing sentences that reflect bias, or they might use outdated terms while expressing genuinely equitable thinking. This is why focusing exclusively on "inclusive language lists" misses the deeper work of reshaping how we think about different groups. Organizations face predictable obstacles when communicating about equity initiatives. Risk perception plays a major role - if people don't believe they or their organization are affected by inequity, they won't take action. Mental shortcuts lead people to trust what sounds true over what is true. Low motivation presents another barrier, as information alone rarely changes behavior. Finally, the perception that there is no solution can lead to denying the problem altogether. Framing helps break through these obstacles by organizing messages without altering their arguments. Research from the FrameWorks Institute identifies three particularly powerful frames for equity communications: ingenuity/solutions first (highlighting innovation to create beneficial programs), opportunity for all (promoting equal access to societal resources), and interdependence (illustrating how our fates are connected). These frames tap into shared values that can unite people before they dive into potentially divisive discussions about equity. Effective equity communications must also explain how systems lead to inequitable outcomes. Blanket statements like "racism is systemic" or "white people have privilege" often fail because they assume knowledge that many people don't have. Instead, communications should build causal links that help audiences understand the "how" behind these statements. For example, explaining how the nine-to-five workday was designed for men with stay-at-home wives helps people see why contemporary work structures create challenges for everyone, regardless of gender. For targeted messaging, organizations should identify their audience's values and barriers to change before crafting communications. Brevity & Wit's message template helps structure these communications: start with shared values, identify barriers, explain why and how inequity occurs (building causal links), and outline what actions to take. This approach proved successful for the Horizon Foundation when addressing racial health disparities in Howard County, Maryland - by tapping into residents' shared desire to "be the best" county, they united leaders around addressing systemic health inequities. Nonpartisan organizations face particular challenges in framing equity work. The key principles for these organizations are: emphasize that IDEA work is about bridging across difference (allowing people to be different), while maintaining that differences are tolerated so long as they don't dehumanize people. By framing commitment to equity as part of a commitment to democracy rather than to any political party, nonpartisan organizations can take principled stands without compromising their nonpartisan status.

Chapter 7: Media and Marketing: Creating External Equity

Media and marketing represent powerful forces that shape perceptions, behaviors, and cultural norms. With the advent of social media, any organization with a digital presence is now part of the media ecosystem, creating content that influences how people think and act. This power comes with responsibility - media don't merely tell people what to think; they control what people think about, showing them how to behave through representation and storytelling. The REACH equity content screen offers a comprehensive framework for creating more equitable media and marketing. Developed by nonprofit leader Vu Le, REACH stands for representation, experience, accessibility, compensation, and harm reduction - five essential dimensions for equity-conscious content creation. Representation matters profoundly in media. Despite progress in recent years, significant gaps remain. While female leads in major films reached parity with male leads for the first time in 2019, less than 33% were women of color. Male characters, though overrepresented, are often confined to narrow definitions of masculinity - rarely showing emotions including empathy, happiness, and even anger. Content creators can counter these trends by depicting a full range of emotions in men and boys, showing them asking for help and maintaining close relationships. Visual representation in marketing materials should include people of different genders, races, abilities, body sizes, and sexualities while avoiding tokenism - the perfunctory inclusion of marginalized groups that feels inauthentic. Experience asks content creators to consider whether they're the appropriate entity to address particular issues. Do you have lived experience or expertise in the subject? If not, are you crediting those who do? Cultural appropriation - when members of a dominant culture take elements from systematically oppressed cultures - differs from cultural exchange and requires careful navigation. The PBS Kids show "Molly of Denali" demonstrates best practices by hiring Indigenous creators for all aspects of production, ensuring that every Indigenous character is voiced by an Indigenous actor. Accessibility ensures that anyone who wants to engage with content can do so. With 56 million Americans (19% of the population) having a disability, designing accessible content is both a moral imperative and good business, considering the $175 billion in discretionary spending power this community represents. Accessibility considerations include vision (using strong color contrast and alt text), hearing (providing captions and subtitles), mobility (ensuring keyboard-only navigation), cognitive ability (writing at accessible reading levels), and culture (designing for global audiences with different contexts). Compensation addresses who gets paid for content creation and whether payment is equitable. Organizations committed to equity should compensate individuals whose stories they use in marketing and fundraising, recognizing that nonprofit organizations aren't news outlets but entities that benefit financially from others' experiences. Communities in Schools exemplifies this approach by paying students for their stories and giving them decision-making roles in the organization. Harm reduction reminds us that equity starts with ceasing to cause harm. Content creators should examine whether their work reinforces stereotypes, promotes stigma, or causes unintentional harm to marginalized communities. One nonprofit organization implemented an equitable policy allowing photo subjects to revoke permission for image use in the future - a critical protection for individuals who might later experience domestic violence or other forms of oppression. Equity cannot be achieved in just one piece of content; it requires a long-term commitment assessed across a body of work. Equitable content creators recognize their power to either reinforce or subvert stereotypes, ensure their work is inclusive and accessible, and leverage social science findings to cocreate a more equitable world through media and marketing.

Summary

The journey toward designing organizations where everyone can thrive requires a fundamental shift in how we understand and approach equity. Moving beyond mere equality, this approach recognizes that true fairness comes from designing systems that account for different needs, experiences, and starting points. The transformation begins with leadership that values difference, sees systemic barriers, and uses power to create opportunities for others. It continues through observable behaviors embedded in organizational structures and communicated through strategic messaging that builds understanding rather than resistance. The ultimate insight is that equity represents not just a moral imperative but a practical pathway to unleashing human potential. By embracing interdependence and designing for human diversity, organizations can create environments where innovation flourishes, people contribute their unique strengths, and everyone has a genuine opportunity to succeed on their own terms. The work demands courage, humility, and persistence, but it offers profound rewards - not just more productive and resilient organizations, but a deeper expression of our shared humanity through the creation of fairness in a world that desperately needs it.

About Author

Loading...

Minal Bopaiah

Read more