Expecting Better

Expecting Better Plot Summary

Introduction

When you discover you're pregnant, the world suddenly seems filled with rules and warnings. Don't drink coffee. Avoid sushi. Sleep only on your left side. Well-meaning friends, family members, and even medical professionals bombard you with advice that often seems contradictory or arbitrary. As an expectant parent, you might wonder: which of these rules are based on solid science, and which are merely cultural traditions or outdated beliefs? This question lies at the heart of evidence-based pregnancy decision-making. The reality is that pregnancy recommendations exist on a spectrum of risk, not in black-and-white categories of "safe" versus "dangerous." Understanding this nuance empowers you to make informed choices aligned with your personal values. Throughout this book, you'll discover how to evaluate the quality of pregnancy research, distinguish between significant and minimal risks, and navigate the complex terrain of prenatal testing options. You'll learn that many common pregnancy prohibitions lack scientific support, while other less-discussed factors significantly impact maternal and fetal outcomes. By examining the evidence behind pregnancy recommendations, you can approach this transformative life experience with confidence rather than confusion.

Chapter 1: Understanding Risk Assessment in Pregnancy

Risk assessment during pregnancy presents unique challenges compared to other medical decisions. When evaluating a treatment for yourself, you might weigh potential benefits against side effects. But pregnancy decisions involve two individuals—mother and baby—with sometimes competing interests. This complexity is compounded by the ethical impossibility of conducting gold-standard randomized controlled trials on pregnant women. Scientists cannot randomly assign some expectant mothers to drink alcohol and others to abstain just to measure outcomes. Instead, pregnancy research relies heavily on observational studies, which have inherent limitations. When researchers observe that women who drink coffee have higher miscarriage rates, they must consider whether coffee causes miscarriages or if another factor explains both behaviors. For instance, women experiencing severe morning sickness (a sign of healthy pregnancy hormones) often avoid coffee, while those without nausea (potentially indicating a pregnancy already at risk) might continue their coffee habit. This phenomenon, called confounding, makes it difficult to establish causation rather than mere correlation. The strongest pregnancy evidence comes from large population studies that carefully control for confounding variables or from natural experiments where circumstances create random variation. For example, researchers have compared siblings where the mother drank during one pregnancy but not the other, providing more reliable insights than simply comparing different families with different behaviors. Understanding these methodological nuances helps expectant parents evaluate alarming headlines and well-meaning advice. When assessing pregnancy risks, context matters tremendously. A 20% increased risk sounds frightening until you realize the baseline risk might be very small—increasing from 1 in 1,000 to 1.2 in 1,000, for instance. Similarly, the timing of exposure often determines significance. Alcohol consumption during the first trimester potentially affects different developmental processes than during the third trimester. By learning to evaluate evidence quality and contextual factors, expectant parents can distinguish between significant risks worth avoiding and minimal risks where moderation makes more sense than elimination. The goal isn't to dismiss all pregnancy precautions but to approach them with appropriate perspective. Some recommendations, like avoiding smoking, have overwhelming evidence supporting them. Others, like avoiding hair dye, have little scientific basis. By understanding the spectrum of evidence quality, parents can allocate their worry appropriately, focusing energy on the handful of choices with substantial evidence of harm rather than trying to eliminate every theoretical risk.

Chapter 2: Food and Drink: Separating Facts from Myths

Perhaps no aspect of pregnancy generates more confusion than dietary recommendations. Let's start with alcohol, arguably the most contentious pregnancy restriction. The evidence clearly shows that heavy drinking and binge drinking during pregnancy can cause fetal alcohol syndrome, characterized by facial abnormalities, growth deficiencies, and neurodevelopmental problems. However, the evidence regarding occasional light drinking is more nuanced. Large observational studies from Europe have found minimal to no measurable effects from light drinking (1-2 drinks per week) on childhood IQ, attention, or behavior problems through age seven. Why then do American medical organizations recommend complete abstinence? The rationale combines several factors: we cannot ethically determine a definitively "safe" level through randomized trials, individual metabolism of alcohol varies significantly, and self-reported "one drink" might mean different amounts to different women. Additionally, some studies suggest subtle effects might emerge later in childhood. Given these uncertainties, medical organizations take a precautionary approach, though many European countries maintain more moderate guidelines allowing occasional consumption. Caffeine presents a similar challenge in interpreting evidence. Early studies suggested links between caffeine consumption and miscarriage, but many failed to account for morning sickness—women with healthy pregnancies often experience nausea that reduces coffee consumption, while those destined to miscarry may not have this protective aversion. More rigorous studies that control for this confounding factor suggest moderate caffeine consumption (under 200mg daily, or about one 12oz cup of coffee) poses minimal risk to pregnancy outcomes. Regarding food safety, not all warnings are created equal. Listeria infection, while rare (affecting about 1 in 8,000 pregnancies), can be devastating, potentially causing miscarriage or stillbirth. However, the actual risk varies dramatically by food type. Soft cheeses made from unpasteurized milk and ready-to-eat deli meats from questionable sources carry higher risk than properly stored deli meats from reputable establishments. For high-mercury fish like swordfish and king mackerel, the evidence clearly supports avoidance, as mercury can damage developing neural systems. But completely avoiding seafood means missing beneficial omega-3 fatty acids that support fetal brain development. The key to navigating food recommendations is proportional response based on evidence quality. Some foods (unpasteurized dairy, raw sprouts, high-mercury fish) present significant, well-documented risks and should be avoided. Others, like properly stored deli meat or moderate caffeine, carry such minimal risk that complete avoidance creates unnecessary stress with little benefit. By understanding the evidence behind food recommendations, expectant parents can make informed choices that balance genuine protection with reasonable quality of life.

Chapter 3: Prenatal Testing: Options and Trade-offs

Prenatal testing has evolved dramatically in recent decades, offering expectant parents unprecedented information about their baby's health. These tests fall into two broad categories: screening tests that estimate risk, and diagnostic tests that provide definitive answers. Understanding this fundamental distinction helps parents navigate the complex landscape of prenatal testing options. Screening tests, like the first-trimester combined test or cell-free DNA testing, analyze hormones in maternal blood or measure fetal nuchal translucency via ultrasound to calculate the probability of certain chromosomal conditions like Down syndrome. These tests are non-invasive and carry no risk to the pregnancy, but they only provide statistical likelihoods, not certainties. A "positive" result on a screening test doesn't mean your baby definitely has a condition—it means further testing is warranted if you want a definitive answer. The newest screening option, cell-free DNA testing, analyzes fragments of fetal DNA in maternal blood with remarkable accuracy, detecting over 99% of Down syndrome cases with very few false positives. Diagnostic tests like amniocentesis and chorionic villus sampling (CVS) provide conclusive genetic information by analyzing actual fetal cells. Amniocentesis involves extracting a small amount of amniotic fluid surrounding the baby, typically performed around 15-20 weeks. CVS samples placental tissue and can be done earlier, around 10-13 weeks. While these tests provide definitive answers about chromosomal conditions, they carry a small risk of miscarriage—approximately 1 in 300 to 1 in 500, depending on the procedure and the physician's experience. This risk, though small, represents the central trade-off of diagnostic testing: certainty versus procedure-related risk. The decision to pursue testing involves deeply personal considerations. Some parents want as much information as possible to prepare for a child with special needs or to make difficult decisions about continuing the pregnancy. Others may decline testing if the results wouldn't change their pregnancy decisions. Medical factors like maternal age also influence testing recommendations, as the risk of chromosomal abnormalities increases significantly after age 35—from about 1 in 1,200 at age 25 to 1 in 350 at age 35 and 1 in 100 by age 40. Modern advances have dramatically improved the testing landscape. The traditional approach recommended invasive testing only for women over 35, based on comparing the risk of Down syndrome at that age to the supposed risk of amniocentesis. This arbitrary age cutoff has been replaced by more personalized risk assessment and a sequential approach: starting with non-invasive screening and proceeding to diagnostic testing only if screening indicates elevated risk. This approach has reduced unnecessary invasive procedures while still identifying most chromosomal conditions. By understanding the capabilities, limitations, and risks of different testing options, expectant parents can choose the approach that aligns with their values and information needs. There is no universally "right" choice—only the choice that's right for your family based on how you weigh the benefits of information against the risks of procedures.

Chapter 4: Exercise and Weight Management During Pregnancy

Weight gain during pregnancy represents a delicate balance—too little can result in a small baby with potential health complications, while excessive gain increases risks of gestational diabetes, preeclampsia, and delivery complications. The Institute of Medicine provides guidelines based on pre-pregnancy BMI: underweight women should gain 28-40 pounds, normal weight 25-35 pounds, overweight 15-25 pounds, and obese women 11-20 pounds. These recommendations aren't arbitrary—they're designed to optimize outcomes for both mother and baby. Understanding the composition of pregnancy weight gain helps explain these guidelines. Only about 7-8 pounds represents maternal fat storage. The remainder includes the baby (7-8 pounds), placenta (1-2 pounds), amniotic fluid (2 pounds), increased blood volume (3-4 pounds), enlarged uterus (2 pounds), and breast tissue (1-2 pounds). The pattern of gain matters too: minimal gain in the first trimester followed by steady increases of about a pound per week in the second and third trimesters typically indicates healthy progression. Exercise during pregnancy has evolved from being discouraged to highly recommended for most women. Regular physical activity helps manage weight gain, reduces the risk of gestational diabetes by up to 30%, improves mood, and may even ease labor. Contrary to outdated beliefs, moderate exercise doesn't increase miscarriage risk or cause premature labor in healthy pregnancies. The American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists now recommends at least 150 minutes of moderate-intensity aerobic activity weekly for pregnant women without medical complications. Most women can safely continue their pre-pregnancy fitness routines with modifications as the pregnancy progresses. The focus should shift to maintaining fitness rather than improving performance or losing weight. Heart rate targets have been abandoned in favor of the "talk test"—if you can carry on a conversation while exercising, you're likely at an appropriate intensity. As pregnancy advances, activities requiring balance become more challenging as your center of gravity shifts, making falls more likely. Contact sports and exercises requiring lying flat on the back after 20 weeks generally should be avoided. Specific exercises offer particular benefits during pregnancy. Kegel exercises strengthen the pelvic floor muscles, reducing urinary incontinence during and after pregnancy. Women who regularly perform Kegels are less than half as likely to experience urinary leakage and may have a shorter pushing stage during labor. Prenatal yoga improves flexibility and reduces discomfort while teaching breathing techniques valuable during delivery. Swimming provides excellent cardiovascular benefits without stressing joints already burdened by pregnancy weight. By understanding the science behind weight management and exercise during pregnancy, women can make choices that support their health and their baby's development while avoiding unnecessary restrictions that diminish quality of life. The evidence clearly shows that staying active benefits both mother and baby, making exercise one of the most positive steps a pregnant woman can take.

Chapter 5: Labor Interventions: Benefits and Considerations

Labor and delivery represent the culmination of pregnancy, yet many women enter this experience with limited understanding of the interventions they may encounter and the evidence supporting different approaches. One of the most significant decisions involves pain management, particularly whether to use an epidural. Epidurals effectively relieve pain by numbing the lower body through medication delivered via a catheter near the spinal cord. The evidence shows epidurals don't increase overall C-section rates as once feared, but they do have trade-offs worth considering. Epidurals typically lengthen the pushing stage by about 15 minutes on average and increase the likelihood of instrumental delivery (forceps or vacuum) by about 40%. They may also cause maternal fever in approximately 20% of women, which can lead to newborn sepsis evaluations and antibiotic treatment. However, they provide superior pain relief compared to other methods and allow the mother to remain alert, unlike systemic narcotics. Understanding these evidence-based pros and cons allows women to make informed decisions aligned with their priorities. Labor induction, which artificially starts the process using medications like Pitocin (synthetic oxytocin) or procedures to open the cervix, now occurs in about 25% of births in the United States. While sometimes medically necessary, elective inductions before 39 weeks increase risks of respiratory problems and NICU admission for the newborn. Even at full term, induction for first-time mothers before 41 weeks may increase the likelihood of cesarean delivery, particularly if the cervix isn't yet favorable (soft and beginning to dilate). However, recent research suggests that induction at 39 weeks with a favorable cervix may actually reduce cesarean rates compared to waiting for spontaneous labor. Continuous electronic fetal monitoring represents another area where common practice doesn't always align with evidence. While standard in most hospitals, research shows continuous monitoring increases C-section rates without improving newborn outcomes compared to intermittent monitoring with a handheld Doppler device. Similarly, routine episiotomy (cutting the perineum to enlarge the vaginal opening) was once standard practice but is now known to increase rather than decrease severe tearing and complications. The presence of continuous labor support, particularly from a doula, dramatically improves outcomes. Randomized trials show women with doula support have significantly lower C-section rates (decreased by about 25%), request fewer pain medications, and report greater satisfaction with their birth experience. This makes doula support one of the most effective interventions for improving birth outcomes—and one of the few with no potential downsides. The timing of hospital admission also influences intervention rates. Arriving at the hospital in early labor (before 4cm dilation) increases the likelihood of augmentation with synthetic oxytocin (Pitocin) and other interventions. By understanding the normal progression of labor and the evidence behind common interventions, women can make choices that balance safety with their desired birth experience, potentially avoiding unnecessary medical procedures while embracing those that provide clear benefits.

Chapter 6: Postpartum Care: Evidence-Based Approaches

The moments and days following birth involve several medical decisions that often receive less attention during pregnancy preparation but can significantly impact both mother and baby. Immediate postpartum procedures include decisions about cord clamping, vitamin K administration, and eye prophylaxis for the newborn, while the postpartum period brings considerations around breastfeeding support and maternal recovery. Delayed cord clamping—waiting 1-3 minutes after birth before cutting the umbilical cord—allows additional blood to flow from the placenta to the baby. Research shows this simple practice increases the newborn's iron stores by about 30%, reducing anemia risk for up to six months. For premature infants, the benefits are even more pronounced, decreasing the need for blood transfusions by 39% and reducing serious complications like necrotizing enterocolitis by 62%. While delayed clamping slightly increases the risk of jaundice requiring phototherapy (from about 2% to 4%), the overall evidence strongly favors this approach for most births. Vitamin K administration represents one of the most evidence-supported newborn interventions. Babies are naturally vitamin K deficient at birth, putting them at risk for vitamin K deficiency bleeding (VKDB), a rare but potentially catastrophic condition that can cause brain damage or death. A single vitamin K injection virtually eliminates this risk, reducing VKDB incidence from about 1 in 10,000 to less than 1 in a million. Despite internet rumors linking vitamin K to childhood leukemia, multiple large studies have thoroughly debunked this claim. The evidence overwhelmingly supports this simple, safe intervention. The postpartum period brings significant physiological and emotional changes for new mothers. Active management of the third stage of labor—typically involving administration of synthetic oxytocin (Pitocin) after delivery—reduces the risk of postpartum hemorrhage by up to 60%. Despite natural childbirth advocates sometimes opposing this intervention, the evidence clearly demonstrates its benefits in preventing a leading cause of maternal mortality worldwide. Maternal mental health deserves particular attention during the postpartum period. Approximately 15% of new mothers experience postpartum depression, yet many cases go undiagnosed and untreated. Evidence supports universal screening using validated tools like the Edinburgh Postnatal Depression Scale, ideally at the 6-week postpartum visit and again at 3-4 months. Early identification and treatment significantly improve outcomes for both mother and baby, as maternal depression affects infant development and bonding. Breastfeeding support represents another critical postpartum intervention. While breastfeeding is natural, it doesn't always come naturally. Studies show that professional lactation support significantly increases breastfeeding success rates. Hospitals with comprehensive lactation programs have higher exclusive breastfeeding rates and greater maternal satisfaction. By understanding the evidence behind postpartum procedures and support options, new parents can advocate for practices that provide the strongest foundation for recovery and newborn health while avoiding interventions that add risk without clear benefit.

Summary

Throughout pregnancy, expectant parents face a barrage of advice, warnings, and recommendations—some evidence-based, others rooted in tradition or outdated science. The key insight this exploration reveals is that pregnancy decisions exist on a spectrum of risk, not in black-and-white categories of "safe" versus "dangerous." By understanding the quality of evidence behind recommendations, parents can distinguish between significant risks worth avoiding and minimal risks where moderation makes more sense than elimination. This evidence-based approach empowers expectant parents to make personalized decisions aligned with their values and circumstances. How might your pregnancy experience differ if you focused your energy on the handful of choices with substantial evidence of harm, rather than trying to eliminate every theoretical risk? What if medical professionals presented options with transparent discussions of evidence quality rather than one-size-fits-all rules? The most empowering realization may be that there is rarely one universally correct choice in pregnancy—two people can look at the same evidence about epidurals or prenatal testing and reach different conclusions based on their personal values, and both can be right for their individual situations.

About Author

Loading...

Emily Oster

Emily Oster is an American economist and bestselling author. After receiving a B.A. and Ph.D. from Harvard in 2002 and 2006 respectively, Oster taught at the University of Chicago Booth School of Business. She later moved to Brown University, where she holds the rank of Professor of Economics. Her research interests span from development economics and health economics to research design and experimental methodology.She is the author of two books, Expecting Better and Cribsheet, which discuss a data-driven approach to decision-making in pregnancy and parenting.

Read more

Related Books by Emily Oster

Loading...

Cribsheet

Emily Oster

A Data-Driven Guide to Better, More Relaxed Parenting, from Birth to Preschool

★★★★☆4.1

Loading...

The Family Firm

Emily Oster

A Data-Driven Guide to Better Decision Making in the Early School Years

★★★½☆3.7