First Bite

First Bite Plot Summary

Introduction

When you bite into your favorite comfort food, have you ever wondered why that particular dish brings you such pleasure? Perhaps it's the creamy mac and cheese your grandmother made when you were sick, or the distinctive spices of a dish from your cultural heritage. Our relationships with food run far deeper than simple nutrition or taste preferences. From our earliest days in the womb to our adult dining choices, we are constantly learning about food through a complex interplay of biology, psychology, memory, and culture. The science of how we learn to eat reveals surprising truths that challenge common assumptions. Most people believe their food preferences are innate or genetically determined—"I've always hated broccoli" or "I was born with a sweet tooth"—yet research shows that the vast majority of our food habits are learned through experience. Even more fascinating is how malleable these preferences remain throughout our lives. Understanding the psychology behind our food choices illuminates not just why we eat what we eat, but how we can change our relationships with food, develop healthier habits, and appreciate the profound connections between memory, culture, and the daily act of nourishing ourselves.

Chapter 1: The Myth of Innate Food Preferences

Many people believe they were born loving or hating certain foods, as though their taste preferences were encoded in their DNA from conception. This belief is so widespread that we rarely question it, yet scientific evidence tells a dramatically different story. While we are born with certain basic taste predispositions—a universal preference for sweetness and an aversion to bitterness—these represent only the foundation upon which our complex food preferences are built. The vast majority of what we like or dislike is learned through repeated exposure and experience. This learning begins remarkably early. Even in the womb, fetuses are exposed to flavors from their mother's diet that pass into the amniotic fluid. Studies have shown that babies whose mothers consumed carrot juice during pregnancy show less negative reactions to carrot-flavored cereal months after birth. After birth, breastfed infants experience a wide variety of flavors through breast milk, creating early familiarity with the family's food culture. This early exposure creates our first food memories and begins shaping our preferences long before we can even speak. The power of repeated exposure in developing food preferences cannot be overstated. Research consistently shows that children typically need to try a new food 8-15 times before accepting it. This explains why many parents give up too soon when introducing vegetables, assuming after just two or three rejections that their child simply "doesn't like" that food. When researchers conducted "Tiny Tastes" experiments—offering children pea-sized amounts of previously disliked vegetables with small rewards for tasting—they found dramatic increases in vegetable acceptance after just 10-14 exposures. The key was keeping the portions tiny and the atmosphere pressure-free. Our food environment plays a crucial role in shaping preferences too. Children raised in cultures where spicy foods are regularly offered early develop preferences for these flavors that many Western children reject. Similarly, in cultures where bitter vegetables are staples, children learn to enjoy these flavors through consistent exposure in positive social contexts. Even genetic factors that affect taste perception, such as sensitivity to bitterness, can be overcome through appropriate exposure and positive food experiences. This explains why identical twins often develop different food preferences despite sharing identical genetic material. Understanding that food preferences are learned rather than fixed offers tremendous hope. It means we can change our relationship with food at any age, though it requires patience and persistence. The next time you find yourself saying "I just don't like vegetables," remember: you weren't born disliking them—you learned to, and with the right approach, you can learn to enjoy them too. This perspective transforms food preferences from immutable traits to skills that can be developed with practice.

Chapter 2: How Memory Shapes Our Food Choices

Memory is perhaps the single most powerful force driving our eating behaviors. When we crave certain foods, we're not simply responding to physical hunger but to complex patterns of remembered pleasure and comfort. These food memories are encoded in our brains with remarkable persistence and detail, creating what scientists call "flavor images" that can last a lifetime and influence our daily food decisions in ways we rarely recognize consciously. Food memories are particularly potent because they engage multiple senses simultaneously. Unlike purely visual or auditory memories, eating involves taste, smell, touch, sight, and sometimes even sound, creating rich, multisensory experiences that our brains encode deeply. The olfactory system—our sense of smell—plays an especially important role, connecting directly to the brain's limbic system, which processes emotions and memories. This explains why the aroma of baking bread or a specific spice can instantly transport us back to childhood kitchens or significant moments in our lives with an emotional intensity that few other stimuli can match. These memories begin forming remarkably early. Research shows that the foods we encounter between ages 3-10 often become our comfort foods in adulthood. This explains why many adults seek out the foods of their youth during times of stress or illness—these foods provide not just physical nourishment but emotional comfort through their associations with security and care. Even processed foods like breakfast cereals or packaged snacks can become powerful nostalgia triggers despite their limited nutritional value, explaining why many adults continue to crave the same highly processed foods they enjoyed in childhood. The emotional dimension of food memory explains why comfort foods vary so dramatically across cultures. For someone raised in France, the smell of fresh baguette might trigger feelings of security; for someone from Japan, it might be the umami richness of miso soup. These associations form early and run deep. In one study, French Algerians showed significantly greater neural activity in response to mint aroma than non-Algerian French participants, reflecting the cultural importance of mint tea in North African households and demonstrating how food memories become intertwined with cultural identity. Understanding memory's role in eating helps explain why changing our diets is so challenging. When we try to adopt healthier eating patterns, we're not just fighting against taste preferences but against deeply encoded emotional memories. The packaged foods many of us grew up with—with their consistent flavors, bright packaging, and associations with childhood comfort—have a powerful hold on our psyches that fresh vegetables often struggle to match. Successful dietary change therefore requires not just introducing new foods but creating new positive memories and associations with those foods—a process that takes time but remains possible throughout life.

Chapter 3: The Evolution of Children's Food Culture

The concept of "children's food" as a separate category from adult food is relatively recent in human history. For most of our past, children simply ate smaller portions of whatever adults ate, with perhaps a few prohibitions against certain foods thought to be harmful. This "family food" approach meant children learned to eat what was available, when it was available—a practical adaptation to environments where food scarcity was the primary concern. The 19th century saw the emergence of "nursery food" among middle and upper classes—bland, easily digestible dishes like milk puddings, plain meats, and thoroughly strained vegetables. The philosophy behind nursery food was that children's delicate stomachs required protection, and that bland food would build moral character. As Dr. Luther Emmet Holt, a leading American pediatrician of the early 20th century, advised: ordinary foods for children should be plain, with nothing too tempting to a child's appetite. Vegetables were to be thoroughly mashed until age seven or eight, and desserts were strictly limited to plain custards and rice puddings. This approach reflected Victorian values of restraint and discipline rather than scientific understanding of children's nutritional needs. The post-World War II era brought a dramatic shift to what we might call "kid food"—highly processed, colorful products marketed directly to children. Unlike nursery food, which was never expected to be enjoyable, kid food was designed specifically to appeal to children's preferences for sweetness, saltiness, and fun. Food companies created products in playful shapes and bright colors, with cartoon characters on packaging and toys inside. By the 1990s, children's food had become a distinct market segment with its own logic: foods should be "fun," portable, and require minimal adult assistance to consume. This evolution reflected changing attitudes toward childhood itself, treating children as consumers with purchasing power whose preferences should be catered to. This separation of children's food from adult food creates a significant transition problem. In cultures where children eat the same foods as adults from an early age—albeit with consideration for developing palates—children typically develop broader tastes and healthier relationships with food. When children are raised on a diet of chicken nuggets, macaroni and cheese, and hot dogs, they often struggle to adopt more varied diets as they mature. Studies show that adults' most preferred foods often remain the same "kid foods" they enjoyed in childhood: popcorn, white bread, hamburgers, French fries, and processed cheese. Rather than outgrowing childish tastes, many adults simply continue eating the same highly processed, sweet-salty foods throughout life. The legacy of modern kid food is concerning from a public health perspective. Children raised on highly processed foods often develop narrow palates and resistance to fruits and vegetables that persists into adulthood. This contributes to rising rates of diet-related diseases globally. More promising approaches can be found in cultures that maintain a tradition of family food, where children gradually learn to enjoy the full range of their culture's cuisine through consistent exposure in positive social contexts. The French approach to children's eating, for instance, emphasizes structured meals, exposure to adult foods from an early age, and the pleasure of eating well—creating a food culture where children typically accept a wider range of foods than their American counterparts.

Chapter 4: Parent-Child Feeding Dynamics

The way parents feed children profoundly shapes not just what children eat, but how they relate to food throughout their lives. Feeding is an emotionally charged interaction—one of the most fundamental expressions of care—yet many traditional feeding practices actually undermine children's ability to develop healthy eating habits and self-regulation. Researchers have identified several problematic feeding approaches that, despite good intentions, often backfire. "Force-feeding" or pressuring children to eat has a long and unfortunate history. Even mild pressure ("just three more bites!") can create negative associations with foods. In one revealing experiment, preschoolers ate significantly less soup when adults repeatedly reminded them to "finish your soup" compared to when no pressure was applied. Over time, children became less willing to eat the foods they associated with being pressured. This explains why many adults still shudder at the mention of vegetables they were forced to eat as children. Equally problematic is the "indulgent" feeding style, where parents are highly responsive to children's food preferences but place few limits on what or how much they eat. This approach is often driven by genuine love—the desire to see a child happy—but studies consistently link indulgent feeding to higher rates of childhood obesity. In one study of Hispanic families, indulgent feeding accounted for 26% of the variation in children's weight, even after controlling for parental BMI. When children are allowed to eat whatever they want, whenever they want, they typically gravitate toward sweet, salty, and calorie-dense foods while developing poor self-regulation. Traditional feeding practices often reflect outdated concerns about food scarcity. In China, grandparents who experienced famine in their youth frequently overfeed their grandchildren as an expression of love and security. One grandmother explained, "Happiness in life is to eat what you want, to eat the amount you want, and to eat whenever you want to." Such attitudes made sense in times of scarcity but become problematic in environments of abundance. Similar patterns appear in many immigrant communities, where food abundance represents success and love, making it difficult for parents to set appropriate limits. The most effective approach, according to research, is "authoritative" feeding: combining warmth and responsiveness with clear structure and boundaries. Authoritative parents provide nutritious options but allow children to decide how much they eat. They establish regular meal times and limit snacking but don't force children to clean their plates. Studies show children raised with this approach eat more fruits and vegetables, consume fewer sweets and sodas, and are less likely to develop emotional eating patterns. This balanced approach respects children's developing autonomy while providing the guidance they need to develop healthy habits. Ellyn Satter, a dietician and family therapist, describes this as the "division of responsibility" in feeding: parents decide what, when, and where food is offered; children decide how much they eat and whether they eat at all. This approach respects children's innate ability to self-regulate their intake while providing the structure they need to develop healthy habits. When implemented consistently, it creates a positive feeding relationship that supports children's developing relationship with food while reducing mealtime stress for the entire family.

Chapter 5: The Neuroscience of Food Pleasure and Cravings

The brain's relationship with food is remarkably complex, involving multiple neural systems that evolved to ensure our survival but now operate in a food environment radically different from the one they were designed for. Understanding these neurological pathways helps explain why changing our eating habits can be so challenging—and points toward more effective approaches to developing healthier relationships with food. At the center of our food-related neural circuitry is the distinction between "wanting" and "liking"—two separate but interrelated processes. Neuroscientist Kent Berridge discovered that these experiences involve different brain systems. "Liking" refers to the pleasure we derive from eating something, while "wanting" refers to our motivation to obtain it. Crucially, these systems can operate independently. We can want foods we don't particularly like, or like foods we don't actively crave. This explains why someone might continue eating a favorite snack long after it stops providing pleasure, or why we might crave foods we know won't satisfy us. The brain's reward system, powered by the neurotransmitter dopamine, plays a central role in food desire. When we eat something pleasurable, dopamine is released, creating a sense of reward. With repeated exposure, the brain begins to release dopamine not just when we eat the food but when we anticipate eating it. This anticipatory response explains why simply seeing or smelling a favorite food can trigger powerful cravings. For individuals with binge eating disorders, this "wanting" system often becomes hyperactive, creating intense cravings that may not deliver equivalent pleasure when satisfied. Our brain creates detailed "flavor images" of foods we've experienced. These aren't just taste memories but complex patterns involving smell, texture, temperature, and emotional associations. Professor Gordon Shepherd's research on "neurogastronomy" reveals that these flavor images are processed in the prefrontal cortex—the same area responsible for decision-making, abstract thought, and memory. This explains why food memories can be so vivid and emotionally charged, often connecting us to specific times, places, and people. When we eat a food that matches a stored flavor image, our brain experiences a sense of recognition and satisfaction that goes beyond simple taste pleasure. The brain's response to food is highly adaptable. When we repeatedly pair certain foods with positive experiences, our neural pathways strengthen, increasing both liking and wanting. Conversely, negative experiences can create powerful aversions. This neuroplasticity is a double-edged sword: it allows us to develop unhealthy attachments to ultra-processed foods but also means we can retrain our brains to find pleasure in healthier options. Studies show that taste preferences can shift significantly with repeated exposure—even adults who initially dislike bitter vegetables can develop genuine enjoyment of them after multiple positive exposures. Perhaps most importantly, our brains evolved in an environment of food scarcity, where calorie-dense foods were rare and valuable. We developed neural systems that strongly reward us for finding and consuming energy-rich foods—a survival advantage in prehistoric times but a liability in today's world of abundant, engineered foods. Food manufacturers exploit this vulnerability, creating products with precisely calibrated combinations of sugar, fat, and salt that maximize the brain's reward response. Understanding this mismatch between our ancient neural circuitry and modern food environment helps explain why so many people struggle with overeating despite their best intentions.

Chapter 6: Breaking Old Habits and Developing New Tastes

Changing established food habits is notoriously difficult. When we attempt to shift our eating patterns, we're not just fighting against taste preferences but against deeply ingrained neural pathways, emotional associations, and social influences. Yet despite this challenge, our food habits remain remarkably malleable throughout life—if we approach change with the right strategies and realistic expectations. The fundamental mechanism for developing new tastes is surprisingly simple: repeated exposure. Psychologists call this the "mere exposure effect," where familiarity breeds liking. Studies show that children typically need to try a new food 8-15 times before accepting it, and adults often require similar persistence. This explains why initial attempts to eat healthier foods frequently fail—we give up after the first few unpleasant encounters, never reaching the point where familiarity transforms into enjoyment. The key insight is that persistence pays off: what seems unpalatable on first taste can become genuinely enjoyable with repeated exposure. Context plays a crucial role in taste development. When we experience foods in pleasant, relaxed settings, we're more likely to develop positive associations. Conversely, foods consumed under stress or coercion often become permanently aversive. This explains why many adults still shudder at the mention of vegetables they were forced to eat as children. Researchers found that college students' strongest food aversions frequently traced back to incidents of "forced consumption" in childhood. Creating positive contexts for new foods—perhaps pairing them with favorite flavors or enjoying them in social settings—significantly increases the likelihood of developing new preferences. Creating new tastes requires patience and strategic approaches. The "Tiny Tastes" method has proven remarkably effective: offering very small amounts of a disliked food outside of mealtimes, with no pressure to eat it, and providing small rewards for trying. This approach has helped children develop preferences for previously rejected vegetables in as little as two weeks. For adults, pairing new foods with familiar flavors or textures can ease the transition—adding a favorite sauce to an unfamiliar vegetable, for instance, or incorporating new ingredients into familiar recipes. Social influence powerfully shapes our preferences, often without our awareness. In a classic experiment by psychologist Karl Duncker, children were read a story about a fictional hero who loved "maple sugar" and hated "hemlock." When later offered treats labeled with these names (though the labels were switched—the pleasant-tasting food was called "hemlock" and the unpleasant one "maple sugar"), 67% of children chose the worse-tasting food because of the positive associations in the story. This demonstrates how advertising and media can profoundly influence food preferences, but also suggests that positive social modeling can help establish healthier eating patterns. Perhaps most importantly, changing food habits requires addressing the emotional and memory-based aspects of eating. Many of our strongest food preferences are tied to comfort, security, and identity. When we attempt to adopt healthier eating patterns, we may feel we're abandoning not just familiar tastes but part of ourselves. Acknowledging these emotional connections and finding ways to create new, positive associations with healthier foods is essential for lasting change. The good news is that with persistence and the right approach, even the most entrenched food habits can shift, allowing us to develop new tastes that support both health and pleasure.

Chapter 7: Cultural Influences on Eating Patterns

Food is never just fuel—it's a powerful expression of cultural identity, social belonging, and shared history. The foods we eat, how we prepare them, when we eat them, and with whom are all shaped by cultural forces that begin influencing us before we take our first bite of solid food. Understanding these cultural dimensions helps explain why eating patterns vary so dramatically around the world and why changing them can be so challenging. Traditional cuisines represent collective wisdom about what constitutes a balanced, satisfying diet in a particular environment. They typically feature complementary ingredients that maximize nutritional value and flavor—beans with rice in Latin America, or fermented vegetables with rice in Korea. These food combinations weren't developed through nutritional science but through generations of experimentation and observation. Anthropologist David Sutton found that on the Greek island of Kalymnos, shared meals serve as deliberate memory-making events. When serving a traditional dish, locals would often say to visitors, "Eat, in order to remember Kalymnos." This explicit connection between food and cultural memory appears in many societies, where traditional dishes serve as tangible links to shared history. Cultural norms powerfully shape children's eating development. In Japan, school lunches (kyushoku) are prepared fresh daily, served by the students themselves, and eaten together with teachers. These meals incorporate seasonal ingredients, balance traditional and modern recipes, and include educational components about food origins and preparation. This approach reflects Japanese cultural values around food: that children should learn to appreciate diverse flavors, understand food's origins, and participate in the social aspects of eating. By contrast, American school lunch programs typically prioritize cost efficiency over quality, offering highly processed foods that reinforce narrow palates—a reflection of different cultural priorities around children's eating. Migration creates fascinating dynamics in food culture. When people move to new countries, food often becomes a crucial link to their heritage. Immigrants may go to extraordinary lengths to obtain authentic ingredients, carrying spices in suitcases or searching for specialty markets. These efforts aren't merely about taste preferences but about maintaining connection to identity and homeland. One Greek academic described traveling with a ten-kilo tin of feta cheese as carrying "white gold"—a tangible piece of home in a foreign land. For second-generation immigrants, food often becomes a site of cultural negotiation, as they balance their parents' traditional food practices with the dominant food culture of their peers. Globalization has dramatically altered food cultures worldwide. Traditional diets characterized by variety and balance are increasingly replaced by what nutrition scientist Barry Popkin calls the "global diet"—energy-dense, highly processed foods high in sugar, salt, and fat. This homogenization crosses cultural boundaries, with similar products appearing in markets from Beijing to Boston. Yet this isn't simply Western influence; it represents a new global food culture shaped by multinational corporations, urbanization, and changing work patterns. Despite these homogenizing forces, food remains a powerful marker of cultural distinction, with families and communities often working actively to preserve traditional food practices in the face of global pressure. Understanding these cultural dimensions of eating is crucial for addressing global nutrition challenges. Effective dietary interventions must work within cultural frameworks rather than against them, recognizing that food carries meanings far beyond nutrition. When we acknowledge how deeply our eating behaviors are culturally embedded, we can develop more nuanced approaches to improving diets while respecting the legitimate role of food in cultural identity and social connection. This perspective helps explain why simply providing nutritional information rarely changes eating patterns—food choices are expressions of who we are and where we belong, not just rational decisions about health.

Summary

Our relationship with food is fundamentally learned, not innate. From our earliest days—even before birth—we begin acquiring food preferences through exposure, memory, and social influence. The way we learn to eat is shaped by parental feeding styles, cultural contexts, and neurological pathways that evolved for a food environment vastly different from today's world of abundance. This learning process is remarkably powerful, creating deep-seated habits and preferences that can feel unchangeable—yet remain malleable throughout life. The key insight from the psychology of eating is that if our food habits are learned, they can be relearned at any age. Changing how we eat requires understanding the complex psychology behind our choices: the memory associations that drive cravings, the social influences that shape preferences, and the neurological pathways that connect food with pleasure. Effective change comes not through willpower or restriction but through patient retraining of our responses to food—creating new positive associations with healthy options while recognizing the legitimate emotional and social roles food plays in our lives. Whether we're feeding children or ourselves, the goal isn't perfection but a balanced relationship with eating that nourishes both body and soul.

About Author

Loading...

Bee Wilson

Beatrice Dorothy "Bee" Wilson is a British food writer and historian. Wilson is married to the political scientist David Runciman and lives in Cambridge. The daughter of A.N. Wilson and the Shakespearean scholar Katherine Duncan-Jones, her sister is Emily Wilson, a Classicist at the University of Pennsylvania.

Read more

Related Books by Bee Wilson

Loading...

The Way We Eat Now

Bee Wilson

How the Food Revolution Has Transformed Our Lives, Our Bodies, and Our World

★★★★☆4.1

Loading...

Consider the Fork

Bee Wilson

A History of How We Cook and Eat

★★★½☆3.9