Future Stories

Future Stories Plot Summary

Introduction

Imagine standing in the court of a Shang Dynasty king in ancient China, around 1200 BCE. A question about an upcoming military campaign hangs in the air as a royal diviner heats a carefully prepared turtle shell. The shell cracks from the heat, and the diviner interprets these patterns as messages from ancestral spirits. This ancient scene represents one of humanity's earliest systematic attempts to peer into the future - a fundamental human drive that has evolved dramatically over millennia. Throughout history, humans have developed increasingly sophisticated methods to anticipate what lies ahead. From the oracle bones of ancient China to the complex algorithms of modern data science, our journey of future thinking reflects our evolving understanding of causation, probability, and the nature of time itself. This exploration takes us through ancient divination practices where gods and spirits were thought to control future events, to the mechanical worldviews of the Scientific Revolution, and finally to our contemporary era of big data and computational modeling. Along the way, we'll discover how different cultures approached uncertainty, how scientific breakthroughs transformed our predictive capabilities, and how these changes reflected deeper shifts in human consciousness about our relationship with time and our ability to shape what comes next.

Chapter 1: Divine Messengers: Divination in Ancient Civilizations

In ancient societies across the globe, divination - the practice of seeking knowledge of the future through supernatural means - was the dominant form of future thinking. From approximately 3000 BCE through the first millennium BCE, civilizations in Mesopotamia, China, Greece, and elsewhere developed elaborate systems to interpret what they believed were divine messages about future events. These societies lived in what scholars call an "enchanted world," where gods, spirits, and supernatural forces actively shaped human destinies. The earliest evidence of official divination comes from Mesopotamia, where clay tablets from the city of Mari (around 1800 BCE) record prophecies delivered to rulers. These messages, purportedly from gods to kings, often contained political advice disguised as divine wisdom. In China, the practice was even more systematic. During the Shang Dynasty (1600-1046 BCE), royal diviners carved questions onto cattle bones or turtle shells (oracle bones), applied heat until cracks formed, and then interpreted these patterns as answers from ancestral spirits. The questions covered everything from weather forecasts and harvest predictions to military campaigns and royal succession - matters of state importance that required glimpses into possible futures. Greek oracles, particularly the famous Oracle at Delphi, represented another sophisticated approach to future thinking. Here, priestesses would enter trance-like states, supposedly channeling the god Apollo to answer questions from individuals and city-states alike. The Delphic Oracle's influence was so significant that major political and military decisions, including Sparta's decision to attack Athens (launching the Peloponnesian War), were made based on its pronouncements. These oracular traditions weren't merely superstitious practices - they represented the most advanced future-thinking technologies of their time, combining religious authority with practical political wisdom. For ordinary people in ancient societies, divination took more localized forms. Village healers, shamans, and local diviners used techniques like reading animal entrails, interpreting dreams, or casting lots to help individuals navigate uncertain futures. The anthropologist E.E. Evans-Pritchard's studies of the Azande people revealed how divination served practical purposes - determining who might be using witchcraft against you, whether a journey would be safe, or if a marriage would prove fortunate. These practices provided psychological comfort in the face of uncertainty while also offering frameworks for decision-making. As societies evolved during what philosopher Karl Jaspers called the "Axial Age" (roughly 800-200 BCE), future thinking began to shift. In China, the I Ching (Book of Changes) evolved from a divination manual into a sophisticated philosophical system. In Greece, thinkers like Aristotle began developing more naturalistic explanations for events. This period marked the beginning of a gradual transition from purely supernatural approaches to more impersonal and mechanical understandings of how the future unfolds - though divine forces would remain central to most future thinking for centuries to come.

Chapter 2: Mechanical Universe: Scientific Revolution Transforms Prediction (1600-1800)

The period between 1600 and 1800 witnessed a profound transformation in how educated Europeans understood reality and approached future thinking. The Scientific Revolution introduced a more mechanical vision of the universe, one governed by universal, impersonal laws rather than the capricious wills of spirits and gods. This intellectual sea change, which sociologist Max Weber later called the "disenchantment of the world," laid the groundwork for modern approaches to prediction and forecasting. Isaac Newton's laws of motion, published in 1687, exemplified this new worldview by demonstrating that the movements of celestial bodies followed precise mathematical rules. If planets moved according to fixed laws, perhaps other phenomena - from disease outbreaks to human behavior - might also follow predictable patterns. Early scientists like Robert Boyle still believed in a creator god who established these laws, but increasingly rejected the idea that spirits could arbitrarily interfere with the fundamental workings of the universe. As astronomer Johannes Kepler put it, "The Universe is not similar to a divine animated Being, but similar to a clock" - and clocks, unlike ancient gods, behave predictably. Alongside this mechanical worldview emerged modern probability theory, which revolutionized approaches to uncertainty. In 1654, mathematician Blaise Pascal corresponded with Pierre de Fermat about gambling problems, developing mathematical frameworks for calculating odds. Their work, along with that of earlier thinkers like Girolamo Cardano, transformed gambling hunches into precise calculations. Pascal later extended probabilistic thinking to theological questions in his famous "wager" on God's existence, arguing that belief offered better expected outcomes than disbelief. By the early 1700s, Jacob Bernoulli's "law of large numbers" demonstrated how statistical sampling could reveal underlying patterns, while later mathematicians like Pierre-Simon Laplace refined these techniques further. The practical applications of probability theory expanded rapidly. In 1662, John Graunt published the first life tables based on London's mortality records, enabling new forms of demographic prediction. Insurance companies began using mathematical models to calculate risks and set premiums. By the late 18th century, there was growing excitement about the potential of statistical thinking to uncover hidden patterns in human affairs. As Mme. de Staël observed in 1796, statistics were revealing that events "which depend on a multitude of diverse combinations have a periodic recurrence, a fixed proportion, when the observations result from a large number of chances." This new approach to future thinking was epitomized by the Marquis de Condorcet, who in 1794 published his "Sketch for a Historical Picture of the Progress of the Human Mind." Condorcet argued that by understanding historical trends and applying scientific methods, humans could predict and shape their collective future. "If there is to be a science for predicting the progress of the human race," he wrote, "the history of the progress already achieved must be its foundation." This optimistic vision suggested that human societies, like physical systems, might follow discoverable laws that could guide rational planning and improvement. By 1800, the intellectual foundations for modern future thinking had been established among European elites, though traditional divination practices remained widespread among ordinary people. The mechanical universe, probability theory, and statistical methods had created new ways of understanding causation and predicting outcomes. These approaches would expand dramatically in the centuries ahead, transforming how humans prepared for and shaped their futures.

Chapter 3: Statistical Patterns: The Rise of Data-Driven Forecasting (1800-1950)

The period from 1800 to 1950 witnessed what historian Ian Hacking called an "avalanche of numbers" - an unprecedented collection and analysis of statistical data that transformed future thinking. Governments, businesses, and scientists gathered vast amounts of information about populations, economies, weather patterns, and social phenomena, searching for regularities that might allow more accurate predictions. This statistical revolution built upon the probabilistic foundations laid in previous centuries but expanded them into new domains with increasing sophistication. In the early 19th century, Belgian astronomer and statistician Adolphe Quetelet pioneered the application of statistical methods to social phenomena. Studying crime rates, marriages, suicides, and other human behaviors, Quetelet discovered remarkable regularities. "We know in advance," he wrote, "how many individuals will dirty their hands with the blood of others, how many will be forgers, how many poisoners, nearly as well as one can enumerate in advance the births and deaths that must take place." This suggested that human behavior, while seemingly unpredictable at the individual level, might follow statistical laws when viewed in aggregate - a profound insight for social forecasting. Weather forecasting emerged as another critical domain for statistical prediction. In the mid-19th century, Captain Robert FitzRoy (who had commanded Darwin's voyage on the HMS Beagle) founded the English Meteorological Office and began collecting systematic weather data from multiple stations. By 1875, the London Times was publishing weather maps based on telegraphed reports from across Britain. Norwegian meteorologist Vilhelm Bjerknes later proposed that weather systems could be modeled as fluid dynamics, with differences in air pressure driving atmospheric currents. These approaches laid the groundwork for increasingly sophisticated weather prediction, though accurate forecasting beyond a day or two remained elusive. Economic forecasting also developed rapidly during this period. The business cycles of boom and bust prompted attempts to identify patterns that might allow prediction of future economic conditions. In the United States, the Harvard Economic Service began publishing regular business forecasts in 1919, while in Europe, economists like Wesley Mitchell studied business cycles systematically. The devastating crash of 1929 and subsequent Great Depression, which few economists had predicted, revealed the limitations of these early forecasting methods but also spurred further research into economic modeling. Medical prediction saw remarkable advances as well. The germ theory of disease, developed by scientists like John Snow and Louis Pasteur in the mid-19th century, transformed understanding of how diseases spread and enabled more accurate predictions about epidemics. Statistical analysis of disease patterns helped public health officials anticipate outbreaks and implement preventive measures. As historian Roy Porter noted, "In the century from Pasteur to penicillin one of the ancient dreams of medicine came true. Reliable knowledge was finally attained of what caused major sicknesses, on the basis of which both preventions and cures were developed." By the early 20th century, statistical forecasting had become integral to government planning, business strategy, and scientific research. World War II accelerated these developments, as military planners used statistical methods to predict everything from bombing accuracy to supply needs. The war also spurred advances in computing technology that would soon revolutionize statistical analysis. John von Neumann's work on early computers in the 1940s pointed toward a future where vast amounts of data could be processed to generate more accurate predictions than ever before. As the mid-century approached, the stage was set for a computational revolution in future thinking.

Chapter 4: Computational Revolution: Models, Simulations and AI (1950-2000)

The second half of the 20th century witnessed a computational revolution that transformed future thinking across virtually every domain. The development of electronic computers, beginning with military applications during World War II, created unprecedented capabilities for storing, processing, and analyzing information. Combined with advances in mathematical modeling and the collection of ever-larger datasets, these new technologies enabled forecasting approaches of extraordinary sophistication and scope. Weather forecasting exemplified this transformation. In 1950, mathematician John von Neumann developed the first computer-based weather forecasts, and soon after, Edward Lorenz began building programs to simulate global weather patterns. His discovery of the "butterfly effect" - the extreme sensitivity of weather systems to initial conditions - revealed fundamental limitations to long-range prediction. Nevertheless, by the 1970s, meteorological centers were using supercomputers to process data from thousands of weather stations and satellites, dramatically improving forecast accuracy. The European Centre for Medium-Range Weather Forecasts, established in 1979, initially produced reliable two-day forecasts; by 2000, its forecasts were accurate up to six days ahead - a remarkable achievement for such a complex system. Economic modeling underwent similar advances. Large-scale macroeconometric models, pioneered by economists like Jan Tinbergen and Lawrence Klein, attempted to capture entire national economies in systems of mathematical equations. Central banks and finance ministries increasingly relied on these models for policy decisions. Meanwhile, financial markets saw the development of sophisticated quantitative methods for predicting asset prices and managing risk. The Black-Scholes model for options pricing, developed in the 1970s, exemplified how mathematical modeling could transform financial forecasting, though the periodic market crashes that continued to occur demonstrated the limitations of even the most advanced models. Perhaps the most ambitious application of computational modeling to future thinking came in 1972 with the publication of "Limits to Growth" by Donella Meadows and colleagues at the Massachusetts Institute of Technology. Using a computer model called World3, they simulated global interactions between population, industrial output, food production, resource depletion, and pollution through the year 2100. Their scenarios suggested that continued growth trends would lead to eventual collapse of global systems unless deliberate policy changes were made. While controversial, this pioneering effort demonstrated how computer modeling could address complex, interconnected global challenges spanning decades. The rise of artificial intelligence and machine learning in the late 20th century opened new frontiers in prediction. Rather than relying on explicit programming, these systems could identify patterns in data and improve their predictions through experience. By the 1990s, neural networks and other machine learning approaches were being applied to problems ranging from consumer behavior prediction to medical diagnosis. These technologies pointed toward a future where computers might outperform humans in many predictive tasks. Despite these technological advances, the late 20th century also brought growing recognition of the limits to prediction. Chaos theory, complexity science, and studies of emergent phenomena all highlighted how certain systems resist precise forecasting even with the most powerful computers. As the millennium approached, the field of future studies increasingly emphasized scenario planning and the exploration of multiple possible futures rather than single-point predictions. This approach, pioneered by organizations like Royal Dutch Shell, acknowledged fundamental uncertainties while still providing frameworks for strategic thinking about the future.

Chapter 5: Planetary Futures: Navigating the Anthropocene Challenge

The dawn of the Anthropocene - the geological epoch in which human activities have become the dominant influence on Earth's systems - has transformed the stakes and scope of future thinking. For the first time in history, humans must consider not just the future of individuals, communities, or nations, but the future of an entire planet and its complex, interconnected systems. This planetary-scale future thinking requires new approaches that integrate scientific understanding with ethical considerations and global governance. Climate change stands as the defining challenge for sustainable futures. The scientific consensus, built through decades of research and modeling, indicates that human-caused greenhouse gas emissions are warming the planet at an unprecedented rate. The IPCC's increasingly refined projections suggest that without dramatic emissions reductions, global temperatures could rise by 2-5°C above pre-industrial levels by 2100, with catastrophic consequences for human societies and ecosystems. These projections have spurred global agreements like the 2015 Paris Accord, which aims to limit warming to "well below 2°C." Yet implementing such agreements requires future thinking that bridges scientific forecasting, economic planning, technological innovation, and international diplomacy. Biodiversity loss represents another critical dimension of sustainable futures. The 2019 report from the Intergovernmental Science-Policy Platform on Biodiversity and Ecosystem Services (IPBES) found that extinction rates are "at least tens to hundreds of times higher than the average rate over the past 10 million years and is accelerating." Projecting these trends forward suggests a future of dramatically simplified ecosystems with profound implications for ecosystem services humans depend upon. Addressing this challenge requires future thinking that values biodiversity not just for its immediate utility but for its role in maintaining resilient planetary systems over centuries and millennia. Resource depletion and pollution cycles present additional challenges for sustainable futures. The pioneering "Limits to Growth" study from 1972 used computer modeling to explore how continued growth in population and consumption might interact with finite resources and pollution sinks. Updated analyses suggest that many of its projections remain on track, with potential resource constraints and pollution problems becoming increasingly apparent. Modern future thinking must grapple with how to transition from linear "take-make-waste" economic models to circular systems that can function within planetary boundaries over the long term. Technology offers both promises and perils for sustainable futures. Renewable energy technologies like solar and wind power have advanced rapidly, suggesting pathways to decarbonize energy systems. Artificial intelligence and big data could optimize resource use and enable more precise environmental management. Yet technologies also create new risks, from bioengineered pathogens to autonomous weapons systems. The philosopher Toby Ord estimates a roughly one-in-six chance of an "existential catastrophe" - one that permanently destroys humanity's potential - within the next century, with most of that risk coming from human technologies rather than natural disasters. Perhaps most fundamentally, sustainable futures require reimagining our relationship with time itself. Traditional economic thinking prioritizes short-term returns, while ecological processes unfold over decades, centuries, and millennia. Indigenous cultures often incorporate much longer time horizons - the Iroquois Confederacy's "seven generations" principle suggests considering impacts 140 years into the future. Modern future thinking for sustainability must similarly extend our temporal horizons, developing what philosopher Roman Krznaric calls "cathedral thinking" - the willingness to begin projects that may not be completed in our lifetimes.

Chapter 6: Beyond Prediction: Embracing Uncertainty in Complex Systems

As we entered the 21st century, our relationship with future thinking became increasingly nuanced. The computational revolution continued to accelerate, with big data, artificial intelligence, and global sensor networks generating predictive capabilities that would have seemed magical just decades earlier. Yet alongside these advances came a deeper understanding of the inherent limitations to prediction and a more sophisticated approach to navigating uncertainty. The rise of big data transformed forecasting across numerous domains. By the early 2000s, companies like Google and Amazon were collecting unprecedented amounts of information about consumer behavior, enabling remarkably accurate predictions about purchasing patterns and preferences. The phrase "big data" entered common usage, reflecting how the sheer volume of information being gathered created new possibilities for prediction. As Viktor Mayer-Schönberger and Kenneth Cukier observed, big data allowed for "applying math to huge quantities of data in order to infer probabilities: the likelihood that an email message is spam; that the typed letters 'teh' are supposed to be 'the.'" Climate science exemplified both the power and challenges of modern prediction. The Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC), established in 1988, developed increasingly sophisticated models integrating atmospheric physics, ocean circulation, ice dynamics, and biological processes to project future climate scenarios. These models successfully captured many observed climate trends, yet still contained significant uncertainties, particularly regarding feedback loops and tipping points. The IPCC addressed these uncertainties by presenting ranges of possible outcomes and assigning confidence levels to different projections - a more nuanced approach than single-point predictions. Financial forecasting revealed similar tensions between capability and limitation. The 2008 global financial crisis, which few economists or financial models had anticipated, demonstrated how even sophisticated predictive systems could miss critical turning points. As statistician Nate Silver noted in his analysis of economic forecasts, many predictions failed because they were overly precise, creating an illusion of certainty where none existed. The most successful forecasters, Silver argued, were those who embraced probabilistic thinking and acknowledged the inherent uncertainties in complex systems. The field of futures studies evolved to address these challenges. Rather than focusing solely on prediction, many futurists emphasized the exploration of multiple possible futures through techniques like scenario planning. As futurist Jim Dator put it, "futures studies does not study 'the future,' but rather... 'images of the future.'" Organizations from corporations to governments increasingly used scenario methods to prepare for different possible futures rather than betting on a single forecast. This approach recognized that in many domains, the goal should not be perfect prediction but rather robust decision-making under uncertainty. Artificial intelligence presented perhaps the most fascinating frontier in future thinking. Machine learning systems demonstrated remarkable predictive abilities in domains from medical diagnosis to language translation. Yet they also revealed new limitations - their predictions were only as good as their training data, and they often functioned as "black boxes" whose decision-making processes remained opaque. The challenge became not just improving predictive accuracy but also developing AI systems whose forecasts could be explained, understood, and appropriately trusted by humans.

Summary

Throughout human history, our approaches to future thinking have evolved from divine consultation to data-driven prediction, reflecting deeper shifts in how we understand causation, probability, and our relationship with time itself. This evolution reveals a fundamental tension that has persisted across millennia: our desperate need to know what lies ahead versus the inherent limitations of prediction in a complex, often chaotic world. Ancient diviners consulting oracle bones, Enlightenment mathematicians calculating probabilities, and modern data scientists building predictive algorithms have all navigated this tension, developing methods that balance precision with flexibility, confidence with humility. What emerges from this historical journey is not a triumphant march toward perfect prediction, but rather an increasingly sophisticated dance with uncertainty. The lessons for our own future thinking are profound. First, we must embrace probabilistic rather than deterministic thinking, recognizing that the most honest forecasts acknowledge their limitations and express possibilities as ranges rather than points. Second, we should cultivate methodological diversity, combining quantitative models with narrative scenarios, expert judgment with collective wisdom. Third, as we face unprecedented planetary challenges in the Anthropocene, we must extend our temporal horizons beyond quarterly reports and election cycles to consider impacts across generations. Finally, we should remember that future thinking is not merely about passive prediction but active creation - the futures we imagine shape the decisions we make today. By understanding the rich history of how humans have grappled with the future, we can approach our own uncertain times with both the humility to acknowledge what we cannot know and the wisdom to use what we can.

About Author

Loading...

David Christian

David Gilbert Christian is an Anglo-American historian and scholar of Russian history notable for creating and spearheading an interdisciplinary approach known as Big History. He grew up in Africa and in England, where he earned his B.A. from Oxford University, an M.A. in Russian history from the University of Western Ontario, and a Ph.D. in 19th century Russian history from Oxford University in 1974.He began teaching the first course in 1989 which examined history from the Big Bang to the present using a multidisciplinary approach with assistance from scholars in diverse specializations from the sciences, social sciences, and humanities. The course frames human history in terms of cosmic, geological, and biological history. He is credited with coining the term Big History and he serves as president of the International Big History Association. Christian's best-selling Teaching Company course entitled Big History caught the attention of philanthropist Bill Gates who is personally funding Christian's efforts to develop a program to bring the course to high school students worldwide in part via the website http://www.bighistoryproject.com

Read more