Hagakure

Hagakure Plot Summary

Introduction

In the peaceful era of early 18th century Japan, an aging samurai retreated to a mountain hermitage and began dictating his thoughts to a younger warrior. These conversations, recorded between 1710 and 1716, would eventually become one of the most enigmatic and controversial texts on samurai ethics ever written. At a time when swords were gathering dust and warriors were transforming into bureaucrats, Yamamoto Jōchō's meditations on death, loyalty, and service captured a profound identity crisis facing the samurai class. How could professional warriors maintain their purpose and values in an era of unprecedented peace? What did it mean to be a samurai when there were no more battles to fight? This historical paradox forms the backdrop for an exploration of samurai psychology during Japan's great transformation. Through vivid anecdotes and sometimes contradictory advice, we witness how warrior values adapted to changing circumstances—sometimes resisting, sometimes embracing the new social order. The text reveals surprising nuances in samurai culture, challenging modern stereotypes about blind obedience and death-worship. For readers interested in Japanese history, military ethics, or how traditional values evolve during periods of rapid social change, this journey through the samurai mindset offers valuable insights that resonate beyond their specific historical context.

Chapter 1: Origins of Hagakure: Yamamoto Jōchō's Response to Peacetime (1710-1716)

The Hagakure emerged during a pivotal transition in Japanese history, when the samurai class was adapting to an unfamiliar era of peace. Born in 1659, Yamamoto Jōchō lived during the middle of the Tokugawa period, a time when Japan had experienced nearly a century of relative stability following centuries of civil war. As a retainer to Lord Nabeshima Mitsushige in the Saga domain, Jōchō witnessed firsthand the transformation of samurai from battlefield warriors to bureaucratic administrators. This dramatic shift in roles created an identity crisis for many samurai, who struggled to maintain their martial values in an increasingly peaceful society. Jōchō's personal journey reflected this broader cultural tension. After serving the Nabeshima clan faithfully for many years, he made the dramatic decision to become a Buddhist monk following his lord's death in 1700. Unable to follow the traditional practice of junshi (ritual suicide to follow one's lord in death), which had been prohibited by both the Nabeshima clan and the Tokugawa shogunate, Jōchō retreated to a hermitage in the mountains. There, between 1710 and 1716, he dictated his thoughts to a younger samurai named Tashiro Tsuramoto. These conversations would eventually become the Hagakure, a work that captured Jōchō's nostalgic vision of samurai values and his critique of what he saw as the moral decline of his era. The Hagakure was not initially intended for wide circulation. Created as a private collection of conversations, it remained relatively obscure for centuries, known primarily within the Nabeshima domain. Jōchō's teachings emphasized absolute loyalty to one's lord, the constant meditation on death, and the importance of decisive action without hesitation or excessive intellectualization. His famous dictum, "The way of the samurai is found in death," reflected his belief that a warrior should live as though already dead, freeing him to act with complete devotion and without fear. What makes the Hagakure particularly fascinating is its contradictory nature. Though Jōchō advocated for the traditional martial values of the samurai, he himself never experienced battle. His idealization of warrior virtues came during an era when such virtues were increasingly unnecessary. This paradox reflects the broader challenge faced by the samurai class during the Tokugawa period: how to maintain their identity and purpose in a society that no longer required their primary skill—fighting. Jōchō's solution was to internalize the warrior spirit, transforming physical combat into a psychological and spiritual discipline. The historical context of the Hagakure reveals much about the anxieties of samurai during this period of peace. Jōchō's writings can be seen as both a reaction against and an adaptation to changing times. He criticized the growing emphasis on material wealth, scholarship, and artistic pursuits among samurai, seeing these as distractions from their true purpose of loyal service. Yet his own approach—emphasizing inner resolve, spiritual discipline, and unwavering loyalty—offered a way for samurai to maintain their distinct identity even in the absence of war.

Chapter 2: The Paradox of Death: Finding Freedom Through Mortality Acceptance

The Hagakure's most famous dictum, "The way of the samurai is found in death," encapsulates Yamamoto Jōchō's central philosophy regarding a warrior's relationship with mortality. Written during the peaceful Genroku era (1688-1704), when many samurai had never experienced battle, Jōchō's obsession with death seems paradoxical. Yet this preoccupation stemmed from his concern that peacetime was eroding the samurai's martial spirit. For Jōchō, constant meditation on death was not morbid fascination but practical psychology—by accepting death as inevitable, a warrior could act decisively without hesitation or fear. The Hagakure contains numerous instructions for cultivating this death-embracing mindset. Jōchō advised samurai to meditate each morning on the various ways they might die that day: by arrow, gunshot, drowning, fire, or disease. "Begin each day by pondering death as its climax," he wrote. This mental preparation was meant to free the samurai from attachment to life, enabling him to serve his lord with complete dedication. Jōchō believed that a warrior who feared death would inevitably hesitate in crucial moments, while one who had already accepted death would act with perfect resolve. Despite the Tokugawa peace, the Hagakure is filled with graphic accounts of violence and warfare. Jōchō recorded stories of beheadings, seppuku (ritual suicide), and battlefield valor with remarkable detail. One particularly striking passage describes how young samurai were expected to practice decapitation on condemned criminals to hone their swordsmanship. "Lord Naoshige ordered his son to do it because he deemed it necessary training," Jōchō noted, lamenting that such practices had fallen out of favor in his own time. These accounts served both to preserve the memory of samurai martial traditions and to remind his readers of the violent reality that underpinned their social position. The concept of "frenzied death" (shini-gurui) features prominently in Jōchō's philosophy. This referred to a state of mind in which a samurai, facing certain death, would fight with abandoned ferocity rather than resign himself to defeat. "If your sword breaks in the thick of battle, fight with your bare hands. If your arms are cut from your body, wrestle your adversary to the ground with your shoulders," advised one passage. This ideal of fighting to the last breath, regardless of the odds, represented for Jōchō the purest expression of samurai spirit—a willingness to sacrifice everything in service to one's lord. Interestingly, Jōchō's emphasis on death coexisted with practical advice about survival. The Hagakure includes detailed instructions on treating wounds, avoiding ambushes, and even tactical retreats. This apparent contradiction reflects the complex reality of samurai life—while the ideal was selfless sacrifice, the practical goal was often effective service, which sometimes required staying alive. Jōchō reconciled this tension by emphasizing that a samurai should be mentally prepared to die at any moment, but should not throw his life away needlessly. The Hagakure's death-centered philosophy would later be controversially appropriated during Japan's militaristic period, particularly during World War II when kamikaze pilots were given excerpts to read before their missions. However, many scholars argue this represented a misinterpretation of Jōchō's teachings. For him, meditation on death was meant to enable effective service to one's immediate lord, not blind sacrifice for an abstract national cause. This distinction highlights how the samurai ethic was transformed as it moved from its feudal origins into the context of the modern nation-state.

Chapter 3: Loyalty as 'Secret Love': The Master-Servant Bond in Saga Domain

The concept of loyalty (chūgi) forms the cornerstone of the Hagakure and represents the most fundamental value in the lord-vassal relationship during the Tokugawa period. For Yamamoto Jōchō, loyalty transcended mere obedience; it was an all-consuming devotion that defined a samurai's entire existence. He compared this bond to "secret love" (shinobu-koi)—a passion so profound it remains unspoken, taken to the grave rather than cheapened by expression. This metaphor reveals the intensely personal nature of loyalty in Jōchō's worldview, transcending mere political obligation to become a form of devotion that defined the warrior's very existence. The historical development of this intense loyalty ethic can be traced to the tumultuous periods that preceded the Tokugawa era. During the Sengoku period (1467-1603), when Japan was fractured by constant warfare, loyalty between lord and vassal was often pragmatic and conditional. Samurai frequently changed allegiances based on opportunity and self-interest. However, with the establishment of peace under the Tokugawa shogunate, this fluid system was replaced by more rigid hierarchical relationships. The Hagakure reflects this transition, advocating for an idealized form of loyalty that went beyond the pragmatic concerns of earlier eras. Jōchō illustrated this ideal through numerous anecdotes about the Nabeshima clan. One particularly telling story involves Saitō Yōnosuke, a retainer who stole rice when his family was starving. Though sentenced to death for his crime, Lord Naoshige (the grandfather of Jōchō's lord) lamented that Yōnosuke's poverty was his own fault as a master, showing that the loyalty relationship was meant to be reciprocal. This reciprocity, however, was asymmetrical—a lord might show compassion to his retainers, but the retainer's obligation to his lord was absolute and unconditional. The concept of giri (obligation) features prominently in Jōchō's understanding of loyalty. Unlike modern notions of contractual obligation, giri represented a deeply personal and emotional bond that connected a samurai to his lord, his ancestors, and the broader social order. This complex web of obligations created a moral framework that guided samurai behavior. For Jōchō, the highest expression of this obligation was what he called "secret love" (shinobu-koi)—a devotion so profound that it needed no external recognition or reward, and would ideally be carried to the grave unspoken. Jōchō's conception of loyalty was shaped by his own experience serving Lord Nabeshima Mitsushige. When Mitsushige died in 1700, Jōchō wanted to follow him in death through ritual suicide (junshi), but this practice had been prohibited in the Saga domain. Instead, he took the tonsure and became a Buddhist monk—a form of "social death" that allowed him to demonstrate his devotion within legal boundaries. This experience led him to lament that "since it was decreed that oibara [ritual suicide to follow one's lord in death] was no longer lawful, there have been no retainers prepared to martyr their lives for their lord." The legacy of this loyalty ethic extended far beyond Jōchō's lifetime. The Hagakure's emphasis on absolute devotion to one's superior would later be appropriated during Japan's militaristic period in the early 20th century, when the state promoted loyalty to the emperor as the highest virtue. This demonstrates how the samurai code, originally developed in a feudal context, could be adapted to serve the needs of a modern nation-state—though many scholars argue this represented a significant distortion of Jōchō's more nuanced understanding of personal loyalty within the lord-vassal relationship.

Chapter 4: The Ideal Samurai: Balancing Action and Deliberation in Service

One of the most fascinating contradictions in Hagakure is its seemingly conflicting advice regarding action and deliberation. On one hand, Yamamoto Jōchō repeatedly advocates for immediate, decisive action without overthinking: "If you are faced with two options of life or death, simply settle for death. It is not an especially difficult choice; just go forth and meet it confidently." He warns that "a calculating man is a coward" who becomes paralyzed by weighing outcomes rather than acting with pure intent. This emphasis on immediate action reflects the battlefield origins of samurai ethics, where hesitation could mean death. Yet elsewhere, Jōchō quotes Lord Naoshige's maxim: "Deliberate lightly when deciding on weighty matters," to which the scholar Ishida Ittei added: "Be meticulous when deciding on affairs of minor importance." This suggests a more nuanced approach to decision-making than mere impulsiveness. Jōchō explains that important matters should be contemplated in advance during daily life, so that when crisis strikes, one can act swiftly without hesitation. The apparent contradiction resolves when we understand that Jōchō advocates preparation before events, but immediate action during them. At the heart of Jōchō's warrior ideal stands the concept of the kusemono—a term that in modern Japanese suggests an eccentric or abnormal person, but which Hagakure redefines as the supreme warrior. The kusemono is characterized by absolute reliability, appearing when needed but remaining inconspicuous otherwise. "Exceptional warriors (kusemono) are dependable men," Jōchō explains. "Dependable men can be relied upon to keep away when things are going well, but will come to your aid without fail when you are in need." This ideal warrior embodies a paradoxical combination of fierce determination and humble restraint. Jōchō rejected the growing emphasis on scholarly and artistic pursuits among Tokugawa samurai. He warned that "a samurai who is too clever will never make it" and cautioned against becoming too accomplished in the arts: "A specialist in an art is an 'artist.' He is not a samurai." Instead, he advocated for warriors to cultivate ichinen (single-minded purpose)—a pure, unwavering focus on service that transcends self-interest. This mental state allows the warrior to act decisively in crisis, entering what Jōchō calls shini-gurui (death frenzy), a state of controlled madness where one abandons all concern for personal survival. The ideal samurai in Hagakure is not a refined gentleman-scholar but a man of action who maintains constant vigilance. Jōchō advised warriors to rise at four every morning, practice proper grooming, and maintain their weapons in perfect condition—not out of vanity but as preparation for death at any moment. This meticulous attention to detail reflected the warrior's resolve to die honorably rather than being caught unprepared. Through such daily practices, samurai could maintain their martial spirit even in an era when actual combat was increasingly rare. This tension between action and deliberation, between fierce determination and careful preparation, reflects the broader challenge faced by samurai during the Tokugawa peace. How could warriors maintain their decisive spirit while adapting to roles that increasingly required careful administration rather than battlefield heroics? Jōchō's solution was to internalize the warrior ethic, transforming it from a code of combat into a psychological discipline that could be applied to all aspects of service. This transformation helped preserve samurai identity during a period of profound social change, though Jōchō himself remained ambivalent about many aspects of this evolution.

Chapter 5: Warrior Identity Crisis: Samurai Transformation in Tokugawa Peace

By the early 18th century when Hagakure was written, the Tokugawa peace had lasted for nearly a century. This unprecedented stability had profoundly transformed samurai society, and Yamamoto Jōchō viewed these changes with undisguised dismay. "People have changed in the past 30 years," he laments. "When young samurai congregate, they engage in vapid talk of money, about profit and loss, their household fiscal problems, taste in fashion, and idle talk of sex." This degeneration of warrior values forms a central theme throughout Hagakure, reflecting the broader identity crisis facing the samurai class during this period. The physical manifestations of this decline were evident to Jōchō in the changing bodies of warriors themselves. He recounts a physician's observation that "the pulse of a man is different to that of a woman. Still, in the past five decades or so, the variance between the pulses between the sexes has become indistinguishable." This feminization of the warrior class reflected their transformation from battlefield combatants to administrative bureaucrats. Jōchō notes that few contemporary samurai would have the nerve to behead a criminal, contrasting this with earlier generations who would deliberately cut their thighs (matanuki) to prove their manhood. As direct military service became rare, samurai increasingly turned to administrative roles, scholarly pursuits, and artistic accomplishments to define their status. The Tokugawa government encouraged this transformation, promoting Neo-Confucian learning among samurai to create a literate bureaucratic class. Jōchō criticized this trend, arguing that excessive intellectualism undermined the decisive action that characterized true samurai spirit. "A retainer who insists on practicing Zen, or composing poetry, or collecting stylish objects, and dressing in outlandish attire is want to squander his stipend," he wrote, dismissing such cultural pursuits as distractions from loyal service. The economic challenges faced by samurai during this period also shaped Jōchō's thinking. With fixed stipends and rising prices, many samurai struggled financially. The Hagakure contains numerous stories of warriors facing poverty with dignity, suggesting that economic hardship was a common experience. Jōchō praised those who maintained their honor despite financial difficulties, while criticizing samurai who became preoccupied with money or material comfort. This emphasis on spiritual values over material concerns offered a way for impoverished samurai to maintain their dignity in changing economic circumstances. Despite his criticism of these changes, Jōchō's own conception of bushido represented a significant adaptation to peacetime conditions. Rather than focusing on battlefield tactics, he emphasized psychological discipline and absolute loyalty. The ideal samurai in the Hagakure was defined not by martial prowess but by unwavering devotion to his lord and readiness to die at any moment. This internalization of warrior virtues allowed bushido to remain relevant even when actual fighting was unnecessary. Jōchō's work thus paradoxically contributed to the very transformation of samurai identity that he lamented, by helping to adapt warrior ethics to a world where warriors rarely fought. The identity crisis of the Tokugawa samurai would continue long after Jōchō's death, eventually culminating in the Meiji Restoration of 1868, when lower-ranking samurai overthrew the shogunate and abolished the feudal system altogether. Yet elements of samurai ethics would survive this transition, transformed into new ideologies of national service and sacrifice. The Hagakure, though initially obscure, would later be rediscovered during Japan's modernization and militarization, demonstrating how traditional values can be adapted and repurposed to address new historical challenges.

Chapter 6: From Obscurity to Infamy: Hagakure's Modern Appropriation (1900-1945)

For nearly two centuries after its completion in 1716, Hagakure remained largely unknown outside the Saga domain. Its critical stance toward the Tokugawa shogunate and local dignitaries made it politically sensitive, and it circulated only in handwritten copies among trusted members of the Nabeshima clan. This changed dramatically in the early 20th century, when Japan was undergoing rapid modernization and searching for symbols of traditional Japanese spirit to counterbalance Western influences. The rediscovery and reinterpretation of Hagakure during this period reveals how historical texts can be appropriated to serve contemporary ideological needs. The first printed edition of Hagakure appeared in 1906, but it was during the militaristic atmosphere of the 1930s and 1940s that the text achieved widespread recognition. Prominent intellectuals like Watsuji Tetsurō and Furukawa Tetsushi published carefully annotated editions that made Hagakure accessible to the general public. The text's emphasis on death and sacrifice resonated powerfully with Japan's wartime ideology, and its famous dictum—"The Way of the warrior is found in death"—became a spiritual foundation for the kamikaze pilots of World War II. This appropriation represented a significant transformation of Jōchō's teachings, removing them from their original feudal context and applying them to modern nationalism. The novelist Mishima Yukio played a particularly important role in popularizing Hagakure during the post-war period. His 1967 commentary, "Hagakure Nyūmon" (Introduction to Hagakure), reinterpreted the text as a critique of modern materialism and a call for spiritual renewal. Mishima, who would later commit ritual suicide after a failed coup attempt in 1970, saw in Hagakure an antidote to what he perceived as the spiritual emptiness of post-war Japan. His romantic interpretation emphasized the aesthetic aspects of Jōchō's death philosophy while downplaying its practical context as a guide for feudal retainers. This wartime appropriation led to intense criticism of Hagakure in the immediate post-war period. Many Japanese rejected bushido as part of the misguided militaristic ideology that had led to defeat and national shame. Foreign scholars often dismissed Hagakure as the "radical, seditious ramblings of a disgruntled old curmudgeon." However, from the 1960s onward, a more nuanced reassessment began. Influential figures like Mishima championed Hagakure as representing the most "beautiful" aspects of Japanese culture that had been indiscriminately purged after the war. In contemporary Japan and abroad, Hagakure continues to inspire both admiration and controversy. Its influence extends beyond academic circles into popular culture, appearing in films like Ghost Dog (1999) and The Last Samurai (2003). For some, it represents a mystical beauty intrinsic to the Japanese aesthetic experience and a profound meditation on mortality. For others, it epitomizes a loathsome depreciation of human life and blind obedience to authority. This tension reflects the text's fundamental ambiguity—its contradictions and paradoxes resist simple interpretation, making it a mirror in which readers often find reflections of their own preconceptions about Japan's samurai heritage. The modern history of Hagakure demonstrates how traditional texts can be reinterpreted to address new historical circumstances. What began as a private collection of conversations between an aging samurai and his disciple became, centuries later, a powerful symbol in debates about Japanese national identity. This transformation reminds us that historical texts are not static artifacts but living documents whose meanings evolve as they are read and reinterpreted by successive generations. The continuing fascination with Hagakure suggests that, despite its feudal origins, it addresses perennial questions about mortality, loyalty, and the search for meaning that remain relevant in the modern world.

Summary

The Hagakure emerged from a fundamental tension in samurai identity during the Tokugawa period: how could a warrior class maintain its purpose and values in an era of unprecedented peace? Throughout the text, we see Yamamoto Jōchō grappling with this contradiction, simultaneously lamenting the decline of traditional martial virtues while adapting them for a world where actual combat was increasingly rare. This tension produced a philosophy that transformed external battlefield prowess into internal psychological discipline. By emphasizing absolute loyalty, constant meditation on death, and decisive action without hesitation, Jōchō offered samurai a way to preserve their distinct identity even as their original military function diminished in relevance. The historical significance of the Hagakure extends far beyond its original context. Though initially obscure, its vision of samurai ethics would later be rediscovered and repurposed during Japan's modernization and militarization in the early 20th century. This complex legacy offers important lessons about how traditional values adapt to changing circumstances. Rather than seeing tradition as static, we might understand it as a dynamic process of reinterpretation and adaptation. The most enduring aspects of the samurai ethic—discipline, loyalty, and psychological resilience—transcended their feudal origins precisely because they could be reinterpreted to address new challenges. In our own era of rapid social change, this suggests that cultural traditions remain vital not when they resist transformation, but when they evolve while maintaining connection to their historical roots.

About Author

Loading...

Yamamoto Tsunetomo

Yamamoto Tsunetomo (山本 常朝), also read Yamamoto Jōchō (June 11, 1659 – November 30, 1719), was a samurai of the Saga Domain in Hizen Province under his lord Nabeshima Mitsushige.For thirty years Yamamoto devoted his life to the service of his lord and clan. When Nabeshima died in 1700, Yamamoto did not choose to follow his master in death in junshi because the master had expressed a dislike of the practice in his life. After some disagreements with Nabeshima's successor, Yamamoto renounced the world and retired to a hermitage in the mountains. Later in life (between 1709 and 1716), he narrated many of his thoughts to a fellow samurai, Tashiro Tsuramoto. Many of these aphorisms concerned his lord's father and grandfather Naoshige and the failing ways of the samurai caste. These commentaries were compiled and published in 1716 under the title of Hagakure, a word that can be translated as either In the Shadow of Leaves or Hidden Leaves.The Hagakure was not widely known during the years following Tsunetomo's death, but by the 1930s it had become one of the most famous representatives of bushido taught in Japan. In 2011 a manga/comic book version was published Hagakure: The Manga Edition, translated by William Scott Wilson, adapted by Sean Michael Wilson and Chie Kutsuwada.Tsunetomo believed that becoming one with death in one's thoughts, even in life, was the highest attainment of purity and focus. He felt that a resolution to die gives rise to a higher state of life, infused with beauty and grace beyond the reach of those concerned with self-preservation. Some viewed him as a man of immediate action due to some of his quotes, and in the Hagakure he criticized the carefully planned Akō vendetta of the Forty-seven rōnin (a major event in his lifetime) for its delayed response.Yamamoto Tsunetomo is also known as Yamamoto Jōchō, the name he took after retiring and becoming a monk.

Read more