How Music Works

How Music Works Plot Summary

Introduction

Before 1878, music existed only in the moment it was created. When Thomas Edison's phonograph captured sound for the first time that year, it fundamentally altered humanity's relationship with music forever. This technological breakthrough marked the beginning of a profound transformation that would reshape not just how we listen to music, but how it's created, distributed, and experienced across cultures and generations. Throughout history, music has evolved in response to both technological innovation and physical environments. From medieval cathedrals that shaped the slow, reverberant qualities of Gregorian chant to modern digital workstations that allow bedroom producers to create chart-topping hits, the story of music is inseparable from the tools and spaces that enable its creation. This journey reveals how seemingly mundane technical constraints—from the four-minute limitation of early records to the acoustic properties of famous venues—have profoundly influenced artistic expression and cultural development in ways that continue to shape our musical landscape today.

Chapter 1: The Birth of Recorded Sound: Breaking Time's Barrier (1878-1920)

Before Edison's phonograph, music was ephemeral—existing only in the moment of performance and living on solely through memory. The invention of sound recording in 1878 fundamentally altered this reality, creating what historian H. Stith Bennett would later call "recording consciousness"—a new way of experiencing sound that would transform human perception forever. Edison initially envisioned his invention primarily for business dictation rather than musical entertainment, with early advertisements suggesting that "cultured people" would collect important speeches rather than songs. The technical limitations of early recording technology directly shaped musical performance. Early phonographs used purely mechanical processes—sound waves traveled through a horn, vibrating a diaphragm connected to a needle that cut grooves into rotating wax cylinders. These cylinders couldn't be mass-produced easily, requiring performers to record the same piece multiple times with multiple recording devices to create copies. Orchestras were completely rearranged for recordings, with louder instruments placed farther from the horn, drums covered with blankets, and upright basses often replaced with tubas because their low frequencies caused recording needles to jump. By 1915, Edison had developed his Diamond Disc Phonograph, which he promoted through "Tone Tests"—public demonstrations where singers performed alongside recordings of themselves, challenging audiences to distinguish between live and recorded sound. While these tests involved some sleight of hand (singers were instructed to imitate the limitations of recordings), they represented an important cultural shift as people began accepting recorded sound as a legitimate form of musical experience. This transition wasn't universally celebrated—composer John Philip Sousa warned in 1906 that recording technology would lead to "a marked deterioration in American music and musical taste." As phonographs became common in homes, music transformed from a primarily social, public experience to something that could be enjoyed privately. Some critics compared private music listening to drinking alone—a potentially dangerous, antisocial activity. Yet philosopher Theodor Adorno saw benefits in removing music from its visual spectacle, arguing that listeners could appreciate music more objectively without distracting performance elements. Recording technology also changed how musicians played—vibrato became more common to mask pitch discrepancies, and tempos became more precise as unsteady rhythms that might go unnoticed in live performance became obvious on recordings. By the early 20th century, recordings had begun to uproot music from its place of origin, allowing distant musical cultures to influence each other in unprecedented ways. Field recordists like John and Alan Lomax traveled throughout the American South, capturing folk music that would otherwise have remained regional. This dissemination broadened musical horizons but also began a process of homogenization, as distinct regional styles were increasingly influenced by widely distributed recordings. The technology that preserved musical diversity was simultaneously beginning to flatten it—a paradox that continues to shape global musical culture today.

Chapter 2: Acoustic Environments: How Physical Spaces Shaped Musical Evolution

The physical spaces where music is performed have profoundly shaped how music sounds and evolves throughout history. Consider the stark contrast between African percussion music played outdoors and medieval European music performed in stone cathedrals. African rhythmic complexity works perfectly in open spaces where intricate, layered rhythms don't get sonically muddled. The instruments themselves—often made from local materials—were carefully designed to be heard clearly in these outdoor environments where people gathered to dance and celebrate. Medieval European music evolved in dramatically different acoustic environments. Gothic cathedrals, with their stone walls and soaring ceilings, created reverberation times exceeding four seconds. This acoustic reality shaped the music composed for these spaces—slowly evolving melodies using modal structures rather than changing keys, which would create dissonance as notes overlapped. The long, sustained notes of Gregorian chant weren't just stylistic choices but acoustic necessities that worked beautifully in these reverberant spaces and reinforced the spiritual atmosphere. What we now consider "church music" evolved directly from these architectural constraints. By the late 1700s, Mozart was composing for more intimate palace rooms where smaller venues with ornate decorations and audience-filled spaces absorbed sound, allowing more intricate musical details to be heard clearly. The frilly, detailed nature of classical music from this period perfectly matched these acoustic environments. Later, Wagner had the Bayreuth opera house built specifically to accommodate his musical vision, with an enlarged orchestra pit and specific acoustic properties designed to support his bombastic compositions. The 20th century brought purpose-built concert halls like Carnegie Hall, which favored certain musical styles over others. Symphonic music works beautifully in these spaces, while groove-based, percussive music struggles with the reverberation. This acoustic barrier functioned as a cultural gatekeeper, privileging certain musical traditions while making others sound inferior in these prestigious venues. Meanwhile, jazz developed in smaller, less reverberant spaces—bars, dance halls, and clubs—where rhythmic precision and groove could be clearly heard. In the 1970s, clubs like CBGB in New York became acoustic incubators for new musical forms. The club's uneven walls, scattered furniture, and low ceilings created surprisingly good acoustics for the emerging punk and new wave bands. The sound absorption allowed musical details to be heard clearly, while the intimate space meant subtle gestures and expressions would be seen and appreciated. The physical limitations of the venue—where audience members could only see performers from the waist up due to the half-standing, half-sitting crowd—even influenced performance styles. Today, we've added new "venues" that shape music in unexpected ways. Car interiors with powerful sound systems have influenced the bass-heavy production of contemporary hip-hop. Personal listening devices like headphones allow for extreme detail and subtlety to be heard, creating music that maintains relatively constant volume but contains intricate sonic textures. As musician David Byrne observes, musicians instinctively create music that works best in the spaces available to them, adapting their art to the environments where it will be experienced.

Chapter 3: Analog Formats: From Wax Cylinders to Vinyl's Golden Age

The evolution of analog recording formats fundamentally transformed how music was created, distributed, and experienced throughout the 20th century. When Edison's wax cylinders gave way to disc recordings in the early 1900s, a new set of technical constraints emerged that would shape music for decades. The 78 RPM discs could only hold about four minutes of music per side, which encouraged songwriters to shorten their compositions. What now seems like the natural three-to-four-minute length of a pop song was actually determined by the physical limitations of these early records. The technical limitations of these discs affected not just song length but also their sonic characteristics. Low frequencies created deeper, wider grooves that took up more physical space on the disc, meaning bass-heavy music had to be either quieter or shorter to fit. Mastering engineers became adept at squeezing the maximum amount of music onto a disc while maintaining acceptable volume and dynamic range. These constraints led to a standardized consistency of volume in popular music, as extreme dynamic changes could cause technical problems in both recording and radio broadcasting. By the 1940s, the recording studio had evolved from a simple capture device to a creative tool in its own right. Les Paul pioneered multitrack recording, allowing musicians to "play with themselves"—recording one instrument and then adding more parts over the original performance. This technology fundamentally changed the relationship between composition and performance. Music could now be constructed in layers rather than captured as a single live event. The introduction of the long-playing record (LP) in 1948 further expanded creative possibilities, allowing for longer compositions and thematic collections of songs. The arrival of magnetic tape recording in the late 1940s represented another revolutionary shift. Unlike disc recording, tape could be edited by physically cutting and splicing, allowing for mistakes to be removed and performances to be constructed from multiple takes. Bing Crosby, tired of performing his radio show live, invested in this technology so he could pre-record his programs and spend more time playing golf. This seemingly small convenience fundamentally changed the relationship between performance and recording. The cassette tape, introduced by Philips in 1963, democratized recording technology. By the 1970s, these portable, recordable formats were everywhere, allowing ordinary people to make their own recordings and create mixtapes. Record companies tried to discourage "home taping" with their "Home Taping Is Killing Music" campaign, but the technology enabled new forms of musical sharing and discovery. In countries like India, cassettes broke the monopoly of major record companies, allowing smaller labels to flourish and regional music styles to gain wider audiences. The introduction of 12-inch dance singles in the late 1970s created yet another format-driven musical innovation. These larger discs could accommodate louder, bass-heavy mixes perfect for nightclub sound systems. DJs began extending breaks by playing the same section on two turntables, creating longer dance sections—a technique that would become foundational to hip-hop. What began as a workaround to the limitations of vinyl became a new form of musical creation, with DJs transforming from mere playback technicians into creative artists in their own right.

Chapter 4: Digital Disruption: Sampling, MP3s and Production Democratization

The digitization of sound, which began in the 1960s at Bell Labs, fundamentally transformed music creation, distribution, and consumption. Initially developed to improve telephone line efficiency by converting sound waves into ones and zeros, this technology quickly found applications in music production. By the late 1970s, digital audio devices began appearing in recording studios—first as effects processors like Harmonizers and digital delays, then as full-fledged sampling instruments that could capture, manipulate, and replay sounds with unprecedented flexibility. Early digital samplers like the Fairlight and Synclavier were prohibitively expensive, but as technology improved and costs dropped, more affordable options emerged. The Akai sampler became the backbone of hip-hop production, replacing the earlier technique of manipulating vinyl records. These technologies allowed producers to construct songs from fragments of existing recordings, creating a new compositional approach that challenged traditional notions of musicianship and authorship. As one producer noted, "Music eats its young and gives birth to a new hybrid creature." The introduction of the Compact Disc in 1982, jointly developed by Sony and Philips, brought digital audio to consumers. Unlike vinyl records, which had physical limitations on volume and frequency range, CDs could theoretically reproduce any audible sound at any volume. This expanded sonic palette led to what some called the "volume wars," as producers competed to make their recordings sound louder than competitors, often at the expense of dynamic range and causing listening fatigue. Writer Greg Milner suggests this might have contributed to pushing consumers away from purchasing recorded music—the technology that was supposed to make music more popular instead made everyone run away from it. The MP3 format, developed in Germany and refined by companies like Lucent (formerly Bell Labs), compressed digital audio files to a fraction of their original size by removing information deemed psychoacoustically redundant. While early MP3s sounded noticeably inferior to CDs, the convenience of smaller file sizes won out. As with previous format transitions, consumers consistently chose convenience over quality. Music historian Walter Murch observed that "Music was the main poetic metaphor for that which could not be preserved," but now it had become just another form of digital information—portable, shareable, and increasingly divorced from physical media. The most profound digital disruption came with the development of affordable music production software for personal computers. By the late 1990s, musicians could record professional-quality audio at home using digital audio workstations like Pro Tools and Logic. These programs not only made recording more accessible but also influenced how music was composed and structured. Features like quantization (aligning notes perfectly to a grid) and MIDI made it easier to create metronomically perfect performances but harder to capture the subtle human variations that characterized earlier recordings. This democratization of production tools coincided with the rise of file-sharing networks and digital distribution, completely upending the music industry's business model. As musician David Byrne observed, "It's sad that just as it has gotten easier for anyone to make a record exactly in the way they envision, the traditional means of selling and distributing music are becoming less viable." Recording studios that once dominated major cities began closing as artists built home studios for a fraction of the cost. The era when recordings were the primary product of a musician's career was ending, replaced by a model where recordings became "loss leaders" for merchandise, live performances, and licensing opportunities.

Chapter 5: Performance as Ritual: Creating Shared Experience in Changing Contexts

The act of musical performance has evolved dramatically over centuries, yet it maintains a fundamental power to create communal experiences that transcend time and culture. From medieval cathedrals to modern arenas, the ritual of performance connects performers and audiences in ways that recordings cannot replicate. This shared experience has taken different forms across cultures and eras, but its essential function remains remarkably consistent—creating moments of collective emotion and identity. In traditional societies, musical performance was deeply integrated into daily life and spiritual practice. In Bali, for example, village temple performances blend religious ritual with entertainment. Audiences move freely, coming and going throughout performances, treating music as an extension of community life rather than a separate, formalized event. Similarly, in many African traditions, the distinction between performer and audience blurs, with participants moving fluidly between roles. These integrated performance traditions stand in stark contrast to the formalized Western concert tradition that emerged in the late 19th century. Around 1900, classical music audiences underwent a significant behavioral shift. Where previously they might shout, eat, and chat during performances, they were now expected to sit silently and listen with rapt attention. Music historian Alex Ross suggests this change was partly designed to keep "the hoi polloi" out of symphony halls and opera houses, transforming music from a communal activity into a more exclusive experience. This behavioral code persists in classical venues today, where even a whispered comment or ringing phone can halt a performance. Popular music performance followed a different trajectory. Early jazz developed in bars, funeral processions, and dance halls where audience participation was essential. The improvisational nature of jazz solos evolved partly as a practical solution—musicians would extend popular sections for dancers who wanted to keep moving. This relationship between dancers and musicians shaped the music itself, just as audience expectations would later influence rock, soul, and other popular forms. When Talking Heads performed at CBGB in the 1970s, their minimalist approach—no rock poses, no rehearsed stage patter, no theatrical lighting—was a deliberate rejection of performance conventions, yet it created its own powerful ritual. The physical configuration of performance spaces dramatically affects the audience-performer relationship. In traditional theaters, the proscenium arch creates a clear separation between performers and audience. Arena rock concerts of the 1960s and 70s required new performance styles to reach massive audiences in acoustically challenging spaces. As David Byrne notes, "Steady-state music (music with a consistent volume, more or less unchanging textures, and fairly simple pulsing rhythms) works best" in these environments. The music that emerged—arena rock with its anthemic qualities—was shaped by both the acoustic properties and social function of these spaces. Digital technology has created new performance challenges. Artists whose music is created through sampling, programming, and studio manipulation face difficult decisions about how to present their work live. Some opt for karaoke-style performances over pre-recorded tracks, while others deconstruct their recordings to create something that visually resembles a traditional band. These approaches recognize that live performance serves functions beyond mere sound reproduction—it creates ritual, spectacle, and community that cannot be replicated through recordings alone.

Chapter 6: Collaborative Creation: The Collective Intelligence Behind Musical Innovation

The romantic image of the solitary musical genius creating masterpieces in isolation has dominated our cultural imagination, but the reality of musical creation is far more collaborative. Throughout history, the most innovative and enduring music has often emerged from partnerships, bands, and creative communities that harness collective intelligence. These collaborations take many forms—from traditional songwriting teams to producer-artist relationships to the subtle interplay between musicians in an ensemble. Famous songwriting partnerships like Lennon-McCartney, Jagger-Richards, and Rodgers-Hammerstein demonstrate how creative duos can achieve more than individuals working alone. These partnerships often succeed because collaborators bring complementary skills and perspectives, with one partner's weaknesses balanced by the other's strengths. As David Byrne reflects on his own collaborative experiences, "Your weaker ideas might get corrected... There's a good chance you might be inspired by ideas that originate outside yourself." This creative friction can push artists beyond their comfort zones and lead to unexpected innovations. The collaborative nature of band dynamics shapes music in profound ways. When Talking Heads formed in the 1970s, their collective musical tastes—spanning from James Brown to the Stooges to Serge Gainsbourg—created an implicit framework for their sound. Though they lacked formal musical training, they communicated through shared references and influences. Over time, they developed a collaborative composition process where songs emerged from group improvisations rather than individual writing. One member might contribute a riff or rhythmic pattern, which others would respond to, creating interlocking parts that no single member could have conceived alone. Studio collaboration between artists and producers represents another crucial form of musical partnership. When Byrne worked with Brian Eno on their album "My Life in the Bush of Ghosts" in 1980, they pioneered techniques of sampling and layering that would influence generations of electronic and hip-hop artists. Their process involved playing repetitive parts over and over to create hypnotic textural beds, then adding found vocals from radio broadcasts and ethnographic recordings. This approach challenged conventional notions of authorship and authenticity, suggesting that the curator or arranger could be as important as the traditional composer or performer. Cross-cultural collaboration has been a powerful engine of musical innovation. When musicians from different traditions work together, they often create hybrid forms that transcend their original contexts. Byrne describes how African musicians adapted Cuban rhythms (which were themselves derived from African sources), creating guitar-based rhumba that sounded completely original. These cultural exchanges, facilitated by recordings and global travel, have accelerated in the digital age, creating ever more complex networks of influence and inspiration. The digital revolution has transformed how collaboration happens. Contemporary musicians often work remotely, exchanging digital files rather than playing together in the same room. For Byrne's album with Brian Eno, "Everything That Happens Will Happen Today," Eno sent instrumental tracks from London, which Byrne then added vocals to in New York. This asynchronous process offers new creative possibilities—musicians can take time to consider their contributions without the pressure of immediate response—but it also loses the spontaneous energy of live interaction.

Chapter 7: Business Evolution: From Record Sales to Modern Musical Economy

The business of music has undergone seismic shifts over the past century, transforming how artists create, distribute, and monetize their work. What began as a simple transaction—musicians performing for direct payment—evolved into a complex industry built around selling physical recordings, only to be upended again by digital technology. These economic structures have profoundly influenced not just how musicians make a living, but what kind of music gets created and heard. In the early days of recorded music, the business model was straightforward but revolutionary. Companies like Edison's Victor Talking Machine Company and Columbia Records manufactured physical products—first cylinders, then discs—that consumers purchased to play at home. This created a new revenue stream that hadn't previously existed, but it also established gatekeepers who determined which artists would be recorded. These companies initially didn't even put artists' names on records, marketing the Edison or Victor "sound" rather than the performers themselves. The mid-20th century saw the consolidation of what became known as the traditional music industry model. Record companies advanced money to artists for recording costs, then recouped these expenses from record sales before paying royalties. This system created a power imbalance that favored the companies, who controlled distribution channels and marketing resources. As David Byrne notes, "Limited finances acted as a set of creative restrictions," influencing everything from song arrangements to recording techniques. Artists often found themselves deeply in debt to their labels, forced to tour constantly or create commercially viable music to break even. Radio emerged as both a promotional vehicle and a revenue source through performance royalties, though these payments often benefited publishers and songwriters more than performers. The rise of television, music videos, and eventually MTV created new promotional channels but also increased the importance of image and visual presentation. By the 1980s, the industry had become highly centralized, with a few major labels controlling most of the market and investing primarily in artists with mass commercial appeal. The digital revolution fundamentally disrupted this model. As recording technology became more affordable, artists could produce professional-quality recordings without label financing. The MP3 format and file-sharing networks like Napster challenged the industry's control over distribution, while streaming services later introduced a model based on access rather than ownership. These changes dramatically reduced revenue from recorded music—as Byrne observes, "Recordings, which used to be basically the most important thing one did as a professional musician, are increasingly just part of a larger package." Today's musical economy is remarkably diverse, with artists pursuing multiple revenue streams simultaneously. Live performance has regained primacy, with concert ticket prices rising as recording revenues fell. Merchandise sales, licensing for films and commercials, crowdfunding, and direct fan support through platforms like Patreon have become essential income sources. Some artists have embraced brand partnerships and sponsorships, while others focus on creating exclusive experiences for dedicated fans willing to pay premium prices. The democratization of production and distribution tools has created a more accessible but also more crowded marketplace. While more artists can reach audiences without label support, standing out among millions of competing songs has become increasingly difficult. Streaming services pay fractions of pennies per play, requiring enormous numbers of streams to generate significant income. This economic reality has pushed many artists toward creating music that performs well on playlists and algorithms—shorter songs, front-loaded hooks, and styles that work as background music.

Summary

Throughout this exploration of music's evolution, we've witnessed a fundamental tension between democratization and control that continues to define the industry. From the earliest recording technologies to today's digital platforms, each innovation has simultaneously expanded creative possibilities while creating new gatekeepers and power structures. The phonograph freed music from the constraints of time and place but created an industry that determined which artists would be recorded. Digital technology made production tools accessible to anyone with a computer but created streaming platforms that pay fractions of pennies per play. This dialectic between liberation and limitation reveals music not just as an art form but as a mirror reflecting broader social and economic forces. The most profound insight may be that music's value transcends its commercial dimensions. While the industry has undergone revolutionary changes in how music is created, distributed, and monetized, the fundamental human need for musical expression remains constant. The resurgence of live performance in the digital age demonstrates our continued desire for shared, communal experiences that recordings cannot fully satisfy. The proliferation of home studios and independent production shows our innate drive to create rather than merely consume. As we navigate future technological and economic disruptions, this perspective offers valuable guidance: the most sustainable approaches will be those that honor music's social functions rather than treating it merely as content to be monetized.

About Author

Loading...

David Byrne

A cofounder of the musical group Talking Heads, David Byrne has also released several solo albums in addition to collaborating with such noted artists as Twyla Tharp, Robert Wilson, and Brian Eno. His art includes photography and installation works and has been published in five books. He lives in New York and he recently added some new bike racks of his own design around town, thanks to the Department of Transportation.Photo © Catalina Kulczar-Marin

Read more