How the Mighty Fall

How the Mighty Fall Plot Summary

Introduction

Throughout history, mighty empires and institutions have risen to great heights only to collapse with shocking speed. The same pattern plays out in the corporate world, where once-invincible business titans can stumble into irrelevance or extinction. This phenomenon raises profound questions: Why do successful organizations fail? Is decline inevitable, or can it be detected early and reversed? The answers lie not in simplistic explanations of changing technologies or market shifts, but in understanding the internal dynamics that propel great companies toward their downfall. This historical analysis reveals that organizational decline follows a predictable path - one with distinct stages that unfold like a disease progressing through a body. What makes this journey particularly treacherous is that the symptoms often remain hidden while the organization appears outwardly healthy and strong. By examining decades of corporate history across industries, readers will discover that decline is largely self-inflicted rather than inevitable. The insights offered here serve as both warning signs for leaders of thriving organizations and a potential roadmap for those seeking to reverse their company's downward spiral before it's too late.

Chapter 1: Hubris Born of Success: The Seeds of Decline (1970s-1980s)

The first stage in corporate decline typically begins during an organization's most successful period, paradoxically making it the most dangerous time. During the 1970s and early 1980s, many legendary companies entered this phase while appearing at the absolute peak of their powers. Companies like Motorola and Circuit City enjoyed unprecedented growth, industry dominance, and cultural admiration - precisely when the seeds of their eventual downfall were taking root. What makes this stage so insidious is that success itself breeds a particular kind of arrogance. Leaders begin to view their achievements as deserved entitlements rather than the result of disciplined adherence to sound business principles. We see this in how Motorola executives dismissed the digital cellular revolution in the 1990s, famously declaring that "43 million analog customers can't be wrong" - just as the market was decisively shifting toward digital technology. This arrogant neglect represents the heart of Stage 1 decline. Another critical manifestation of hubris appears when organizations confuse the "what" of their success with the "why." The Great Atlantic & Pacific Tea Company (A&P) exemplified this problem when its leaders fossilized around specific practices that had worked in the past rather than understanding the deeper principles that had made them successful. While competitors evolved to meet changing consumer needs, A&P clung to outdated store formats and business approaches, smugly declaring "You can't quarrel with a hundred years of success." During this period, companies also typically begin to lose what made them special in the first place - a learning orientation. Contrast Sam Walton of Walmart, who remained intensely curious and humble despite building one of the world's largest companies, with the executives at Circuit City who neglected their core retail business while chasing exciting new ventures. When Circuit City diverted attention from its electronics superstores to pursue CarMax and Divx, it created an opening for Best Buy to revolutionize the customer experience and ultimately dominate the industry. The final hallmark of this stage involves the discounting of luck's role in success. Companies that attribute their achievements entirely to superior strategy, leadership, or execution become dangerously blind to changing conditions. They fail to acknowledge that fortune, timing, and circumstances beyond their control played important roles in their rise - leaving them vulnerable when those favorable conditions shift. By understanding these early warning signs of hubris, leaders can practice preventive medicine, maintaining the disciplined thinking and humility that created success in the first place. The tragedy is that most don't recognize they've entered Stage 1 until they've already progressed to the next, more dangerous phase of decline.

Chapter 2: Undisciplined Pursuit of More: Overreaching Beyond Capabilities

As the 1980s progressed into the early 1990s, companies infected with hubris naturally evolved into the second stage of decline: undisciplined pursuit of more. This phase manifests not as complacency or stagnation, but rather as frenetic, undisciplined growth that stretches organizations beyond their capabilities. Ames Department Stores exemplified this pattern when it acquired Zayre department stores in 1988, attempting to more than double its size virtually overnight while dramatically changing its strategic positioning from rural to urban markets. The research reveals a counterintuitive finding: companies rarely fall because they're too slow to change. Rather, they typically show tremendous energy and ambition during Stage 2, but channel it in undisciplined ways. Rubbermaid, once crowned America's most admired company by Fortune magazine, crashed into decline while pursuing an unsustainable pace of innovation – introducing one new product every day, 365 days per year, while simultaneously entering a new product category every 12-18 months. This frenzied expansion eventually overwhelmed its operational capabilities, creating supply chain problems and customer disappointments. During this period, many companies break what might be called "Packard's Law," named after HP co-founder David Packard. This principle holds that no company can grow revenues consistently faster than its ability to get enough of the right people to implement that growth and still become a great company. When organizations violate this law, they fill key positions with the wrong people and then institute bureaucratic procedures to compensate for those people's inadequacies. This drives away the right people, creating a downward spiral where mediocrity becomes institutionalized. Growth obsession dominated many corporate boardrooms during this era. Merck's 1995 annual report explicitly stated that being a "top-tier growth company" was its number one business objective – not developing breakthrough medicines or scientific excellence. This mentality led to an increasing emphasis on acquisitions, expanded markets, and diversification rather than disciplined focus on core strengths. When Merck pinned its growth ambitions on the blockbuster drug Vioxx, it positioned itself for a catastrophic fall when safety concerns eventually forced the drug's withdrawal. Another hallmark of this stage involves problematic succession of power. In virtually every case of corporate decline studied, leadership transition difficulties emerged by the end of Stage 2. Some organizations saw domineering leaders fail to develop strong successors. Others witnessed qualified candidates turn down CEO roles or key executives unexpectedly depart. The research shows that while a single leader cannot make a company great alone, the wrong leader can almost single-handedly bring one down. What makes Stage 2 particularly dangerous is that to outside observers, the company often still appears healthy and vibrant. Revenue growth may be impressive, innovation plentiful, and press coverage favorable. But beneath the surface, the disciplined adherence to sound principles that created success in the first place has been replaced by an unhealthy addiction to growth at any cost.

Chapter 3: Denial of Risk and Peril: Ignoring Warning Signs

By the late 1980s through the 1990s, many companies entered the third stage of decline, characterized by mounting internal warning signs while external results remained strong enough to justify complacency. During this phase, leaders begin to discount negative data, amplify positive data, and put a positive spin on ambiguous information. The critical mistake is not that they fail to see potential threats, but that they fail to confront the brutal facts of their reality. Motorola's Iridium satellite phone project provides a textbook example of this stage. Originally conceived in the mid-1980s as an innovative solution for global communication, by 1996 the business case for Iridium had weakened considerably as traditional cellular service expanded worldwide. Yet despite mounting evidence that the project faced serious challenges – including phones that cost $3,000, required users to be outdoors to connect, and charged $3-7 per minute – Motorola pushed forward. After launching in 1998, Iridium filed for bankruptcy the very next year, defaulting on $1.5 billion in loans. Companies in Stage 3 typically make big bets based on flawed assumptions rather than empirical validation. This differs markedly from the approach taken by Texas Instruments with its digital signal processing (DSP) technology. TI made a small initial investment of $150,000 in 1979, then methodically built its DSP capability over fifteen years based on growing market evidence. Only after accumulating this evidence did TI make its "big bet" to become the Intel of DSP. The contrast illustrates a fundamental principle: great companies make big moves, but only after accumulating empirical validation that the odds are in their favor. During this period, leadership team dynamics typically deteriorate in specific ways. Healthy debate disappears as people shield those in power from unpleasant facts. Team members assert strong opinions without providing data or evidence. Questions get replaced by statements and pronouncements. And perhaps most tellingly, blame shifts outward – to competitors, the economy, unfair trade practices, or other external factors. When Zenith began to lose market share to Japanese television manufacturers in the 1970s, its CEO pointed everywhere but inward: "Who could have predicted the Arabs could have gotten together on any subject? Who could have foreseen Watergate? The great inflation we had?" Another warning sign that emerged consistently during Stage 3 was obsessive reorganization. Scott Paper, facing serious competitive threats from Procter & Gamble and Kimberly-Clark, responded primarily by reshuffling boxes on the organizational chart rather than addressing fundamental strategic weaknesses. At one point, Scott reorganized three times in four years while failing to mount a meaningful competitive response. This pattern reflects a deeper problem: reorganization creates the illusion of decisive action without actually addressing root causes. What makes this stage particularly dangerous is that the company can still appear healthy on the outside, just as a patient with undiagnosed cancer might look perfectly fine while the disease grows internally. Financial metrics might remain acceptable, public perception might remain positive, and leadership might genuinely believe their own optimistic narrative. But beneath the surface, the company has become vulnerable to catastrophic decline if faced with adverse circumstances.

Chapter 4: Grasping for Salvation: The Search for Silver Bullets

As the 1990s progressed into the early 2000s, many once-great companies tumbled into the fourth stage of decline. Now facing undeniable performance problems, these organizations began desperately grasping for quick, dramatic solutions rather than returning to the disciplined thinking that had made them great. This stage is characterized by a series of silver bullets – bold but untested strategies, charismatic savior CEOs, revolutionary transformations, or game-changing acquisitions – each promising salvation but typically accelerating the downward spiral. Hewlett-Packard's journey exemplifies this pattern. Despite quintupling profits under CEO Lew Platt from 1992 to 1998, HP began to struggle as the dot-com bubble inflated, making its steady growth appear inadequate. In 1999, the board replaced Platt with Carly Fiorina, a charismatic, high-profile executive from Lucent Technologies. Fiorina immediately starred in television commercials proclaiming "The company of Bill Hewlett and Dave Packard is being reinvented," and launched a dramatic transformation. The contrast with IBM's turnaround under Lou Gerstner couldn't be starker – where Fiorina sought the spotlight and proclaimed revolutionary change, Gerstner told Fortune, "It would not be believable that after 30 days somebody could lay out a timetable for changing a company of this size." Circuit City's decline accelerated during this period as it lurched from one silver bullet to another. The company replaced its CEO with an executive from Best Buy, fired over 3,000 of its most experienced employees to cut costs, launched new branding campaigns, and eventually hired Goldman Sachs to find a buyer. Each move created a brief glimmer of hope followed by disappointment. Similarly, Motorola responded to its first annual loss in over fifty years by embarking on "shock therapy" – buying General Instruments for $17 billion and jumping headlong into the Internet boom with a strategy called "Intelligence Everywhere," just before the tech bubble burst. Companies in Stage 4 typically demonstrate what might be called "savior syndrome" – believing that the right leader with the right vision can single-handedly rescue the organization. Eight of the eleven fallen companies studied hired outside CEOs during their decline, yet performance generally worsened under these supposed saviors. This contrasts sharply with successful turnarounds like IBM's, where despite coming from outside, Gerstner avoided revolutionary rhetoric and focused instead on rigorous analysis, rebuilding the leadership team, and returning to customer-centered disciplines. The hallmark of this stage is chronic inconsistency. Addressograph cycled through four CEOs in less than a dozen years, moved headquarters from Cleveland to Los Angeles and then to Chicago, and pursued wildly different strategies – lurching about in what one executive described as "leaving in the middle of brain surgery." This pattern creates what researchers call a "doom loop" where initial excitement about a new direction leads to disappointing results, which triggers another dramatic change, leading to more disappointment, and so on. What makes Stage 4 particularly dangerous is that the very real pressure to produce results creates an environment where thoughtful, deliberate action seems inadequate. Leaders feel compelled to take dramatic action – any action – to demonstrate they're addressing problems. Yet this frantic activity typically depletes resources, confuses employees and customers, and makes recovery increasingly difficult. Companies that survive this stage are those that break this cycle and return to disciplined thinking and execution.

Chapter 5: Capitulation to Irrelevance: The Final Stage of Decline

By the late 1990s and early 2000s, many once-mighty corporations reached the final, terminal stage of decline. After exhausting their financial and organizational resources through repeated failed salvation attempts, these companies faced a stark reality: capitulation to irrelevance or death. This stage takes two primary forms – either a deliberate decision to sell or liquidate, or a final slide into bankruptcy after all options have been exhausted. Scott Paper exemplifies the first path. After falling behind competitors and cycling through multiple restructurings that cost nearly $1 billion, Scott's board brought in Al "Rambo" Dunlap as CEO in 1994. Dunlap, nicknamed "Chainsaw Al" for his aggressive cost-cutting, slashed over 11,000 jobs, including 71% of upper management. When profits temporarily rebounded from these cuts, Dunlap quickly sold the once-proud Scott Paper to archrival Kimberly-Clark. As analyst Kathryn McAuley noted when hearing of Dunlap's appointment, "I said to myself: 'Well, the board sold the company.'" Scott's capitulation didn't result from a sudden catastrophe but from the accumulated impact of all previous stages of decline. Zenith illustrates the second, more prolonged path to capitulation. Once America's premier television manufacturer, Zenith entered Stage 5 after decades of decline. What makes Zenith's story particularly poignant is that the company actually discovered a potential path to renewal through its computer division. Under the leadership of Jerry Pearlman, Zenith became the #2 maker of IBM-compatible personal computers and a leader in the emerging laptop market. But years of neglect and denial had so weakened Zenith's financial position that when faced with the need to either exit the television business or sell the computer division, Pearlman found himself without viable options. In 1989, he sold Zenith's promising computer business to Bull Corporation, appearing "relieved" according to observers. Zenith limped along for another decade before bankruptcy, emerging as just a shadow of its former self. The defining characteristic of Stage 5 is the exhaustion of options. By this point, the organization's financial resources have been depleted through years of losses and failed turnaround attempts. Its human capital has eroded as talented people have fled for more promising opportunities. Its reputation has suffered, making it difficult to attract customers, partners, or investors. And perhaps most critically, the psychological will to fight has been broken by repeated disappointments and failures. For companies that reach this stage, the question becomes not whether they can return to greatness, but whether anything of value can be salvaged. Some, like Scott Paper, can at least preserve some shareholder value through acquisition. Others, like Addressograph, cycle through bankruptcies and restructurings, shrinking from tens of thousands of employees to mere hundreds. And some simply disappear completely, their assets liquidated and their names surviving only in business history books. The tragedy of Stage 5 is that it rarely represents a necessary or inevitable outcome. Had these companies detected and addressed the warning signs in earlier stages, most could have averted their ultimate fate. As one longtime analyst said of Addressograph's demise: "It's been almost like a guy who contracts a fatal disease. I've just watched it shrivel up and die. It's very sad."

Chapter 6: Lessons from the Fallen Giants: Patterns Across Industries

Examining corporate decline across decades and industries reveals striking patterns that transcend specific sectors or time periods. From the 1970s through the 2000s, these patterns repeated with remarkable consistency, suggesting fundamental principles about organizational failure that apply whether selling televisions, pharmaceuticals, or financial services. Understanding these patterns provides crucial insight for leaders seeking to prevent or reverse decline in their own organizations. Perhaps the most surprising finding is that great companies rarely fall because they're too slow to change. The common narrative that corporations fail because they become complacent, resistant to innovation, or blind to market shifts proves largely false. Of the eleven major corporate declines studied, only one (A&P) showed strong evidence of complacency. The others demonstrated substantial energy, ambition, and often significant innovation during their descent. Motorola increased its patent productivity from 613 to 1,016 between 1991-1995 while already in decline. Merck patented nearly 2,000 compounds from 1996-2002, more than any competitor. Even HP launched its "Invent" campaign and doubled patent applications just as it spiraled downward. Another consistent pattern reveals that external factors rarely drive decline. While companies often blamed their troubles on industry conditions, technological disruption, or unfair competition, the research shows that decline is predominantly self-inflicted. This becomes evident when examining "matched pairs" – companies facing identical external environments but achieving dramatically different outcomes. While Circuit City plummeted into bankruptcy, Best Buy thrived in the exact same retail environment. While Motorola struggled, Texas Instruments prospered despite facing the same technological and competitive challenges. Leadership succession emerges as a critical vulnerability point across nearly all cases. Companies that maintained greatness demonstrated remarkable consistency in how they handled leadership transitions – typically promoting from within, selecting leaders who embodied the organization's core values, and ensuring smooth handoffs of power. Contrast this with the chaotic succession seen in fallen companies: boards divided on CEO selection, strong candidates declining the position, unexpected departures of key executives, or bringing in outsiders who failed to understand the company's culture. Financial patterns provided consistent early warning signs across cases. Three metrics in particular – gross margins, current ratio (current assets divided by current liabilities), and debt-to-equity ratio – showed deterioration well before visible decline in all eleven cases. Yet leadership teams typically explained away these warning signs rather than confronting them directly. This reflects a broader pattern of denial where companies replaced honest dialogue with positive spin, amplified good news while discounting bad news, and focused on public perception rather than operational reality. Perhaps most instructively, the research reveals that the sequence of decline follows a consistent pattern across industries and eras. Each stage enables and accelerates the next, creating a downward spiral that becomes increasingly difficult to reverse. Hubris leads to overreaching, which creates unseen risks, which are then denied until performance visibly deteriorates, triggering desperate salvation attempts that deplete resources, eventually leading to capitulation. Understanding this sequence provides the opportunity for early intervention, before the damage becomes irreversible.

Chapter 7: Recovery and Resilience: How Some Companies Rebounded

While the historical record of corporate decline reveals many cautionary tales, it also provides inspiring examples of companies that confronted decline and recovered. These resilient organizations demonstrate that the trajectory toward failure is not inevitable and offer valuable lessons about the specific leadership approaches and organizational disciplines that enable renewal. Their stories represent well-founded hope for organizations at any stage of decline. IBM's remarkable turnaround under Lou Gerstner in the 1990s stands as perhaps the most dramatic example. Facing losses exceeding $15 billion from 1991-1993, IBM appeared headed for breakup or irrelevance. Unlike many leaders who seek immediate visibility and dramatic action, Gerstner deliberately avoided the spotlight, telling USA Today, "No, thank you. We're going dark for a bit while we assess the task at hand." He focused first on getting the right people in key positions, then confronting the brutal reality of IBM's situation through rigorous analysis, and finally rebuilding around a simple, powerful idea: IBM could be the best in the world at technology integration services. Rather than pursuing revolutionary change, Gerstner systematically rebuilt IBM's core strengths while discarding what no longer worked. His disciplined approach rejected silver bullets in favor of consistent execution, eventually returning IBM to industry leadership. Xerox's recovery under Anne Mulcahy offers another instructive case. Inheriting a company with $19 billion in debt, just $100 million in cash, and a stock price that had dropped 92% in less than two years, Mulcahy faced the very real threat of bankruptcy. Though advisors repeatedly suggested Chapter 11, Mulcahy maintained a steely silence, refusing to consider that option. Drawing inspiration from Ernest Shackleton's Antarctic rescue mission, she worked without taking weekends off for two years, making painful decisions to shut down businesses while simultaneously increasing R&D investment. "For me, this was all about having a company that people could retire from, having a company that their kids could come and work at," she explained. By 2006, Xerox had returned to generating over $1 billion in annual profits. Across multiple recovery cases, including Nucor, Nordstrom, and others, consistent patterns emerge. Recovery begins with disciplined people – leaders who demonstrate both personal humility and fierce resolve to restore the enterprise. These leaders focus first on getting the right people in key positions before determining strategic direction. They confront brutal facts without losing faith that they can ultimately prevail. They identify and build upon the organization's core strengths rather than attempting radical reinvention. Notably, companies that successfully recovered rarely sought outside saviors or revolutionary transformations. Instead, they typically selected leaders from within who deeply understood the organization's culture and capabilities. They avoided lurching from strategy to strategy, instead building momentum through a series of consistent, well-executed decisions. They distinguished between their enduring core values (which remained constant) and their operating practices (which evolved to meet changing conditions). Perhaps most importantly, these recoveries demonstrate that decline – even advanced decline – need not be a death sentence. As long as an organization hasn't exhausted its financial and psychological resources, the possibility of renewal remains. The decisive factor appears to be leadership that refuses to capitulate, maintaining what Churchill called "the ability to go from failure to failure without losing enthusiasm." As he told graduates at Harrow School in 1941, during Britain's darkest days: "Never give in, never give in, never, never, never, never – in nothing, great or small, large or petty – never give in except to convictions of honor and good sense."

Summary

Throughout this historical analysis of corporate decline, a profound paradox emerges: the mighty rarely fall because of what happens to them, but because of what happens within them. The consistent pattern across decades and industries reveals that decline follows a predictable sequence that begins during periods of apparent strength and success. Companies like Motorola, Circuit City, and Merck began their descent not through complacency or failure to innovate, but through the arrogance that often accompanies achievement. This then progressed through stages of overreaching, denial, desperate salvation attempts, and finally capitulation. At each stage, leaders made choices that accelerated their downward trajectory, proving that organizational decline is largely self-inflicted rather than inevitable. This historical perspective offers crucial lessons for today's leaders across all sectors. First, success itself creates vulnerability, requiring increased vigilance and humility precisely when everything appears to be going well. Second, early detection of decline provides the best opportunity for intervention, making it essential to monitor warning signs like deteriorating financial metrics, unhealthy team dynamics, and problematic leadership transitions. Third, recovery from decline depends not on finding revolutionary new directions or charismatic saviors, but on returning to disciplined thinking and consistent execution around core strengths. As Winston Churchill demonstrated during Britain's darkest hours, the path forward often requires the determination to "never give in" combined with the wisdom to distinguish between unchangeable values and necessary adaptations. By understanding these historical patterns, leaders can better navigate their own organizations through challenging times, potentially turning moments of crisis into catalysts for renewed greatness.

About Author

Loading...

Jim Collins

Librarian Note: There is more than one author in the GoodReads database with this name. James C. Collins is an American researcher, author, speaker and consultant focused on the subject of business management and company sustainability and growth.

Read more

Related Books by Jim Collins

Loading...

The 7 Habits of Highly Effective People

Jim Collins

Powerful Lessons in Personal Change

★★★★½4.6

Loading...

Good to Great

Jim Collins

Why Some Companies Make the Leap...and Others Don't

★★★★½4.5

Loading...

Built to Last

Jim Collins

Successful Habits of Visionary Companies

★★★★☆4.1

Loading...

Great by Choice

Jim Collins

Uncertainty, Chaos, and Luck – Why Some Thrive Despite Them All

★★★★☆4.1

Loading...

Beyond Entrepreneurship 2.0

Jim Collins

Turning Your Business into an Enduring Great Company

★★★★☆4.4

Loading...

Lead Yourself First

Jim Collins

Inspiring Leadership Through Solitude

★★★½☆3.8