How to Raise an Adult

How to Raise an Adult Plot Summary

Introduction

In the early 1980s, a profound shift began to transform American parenting. The faces of missing children appeared on milk cartons across the country, a government report warned that American education was falling behind global competitors, and the concept of the "playdate" emerged as unstructured neighborhood play disappeared. These seemingly unrelated developments marked the beginning of what would become known as "helicopter parenting" - a style of child-rearing characterized by unprecedented levels of parental involvement, supervision, and intervention. This historical transformation of the parent-child relationship has had far-reaching consequences, creating a generation of young adults who, despite impressive achievements on paper, often struggle with independence, resilience, and self-direction. The paradox at the heart of this story is both fascinating and troubling: parents who invested extraordinary resources in ensuring their children's success inadvertently undermined the very qualities needed for genuine achievement and fulfillment. By exploring how this happened and what can be done to restore balance, readers will gain valuable insights into one of the most significant cultural shifts of our time - one that affects not just families but educational institutions, workplaces, and society as a whole.

Chapter 1: The Rise of Helicopter Parenting (1980s-1990s)

The transformation of American parenting began in the mid-1980s, when several significant cultural shifts converged to create what would later be called "helicopter parenting." In 1983, the tragic story of Adam Walsh, a young boy who was abducted and murdered, became a made-for-television movie watched by 38 million Americans. Soon after, the faces of missing children began appearing on milk cartons nationwide. This heightened awareness of child abductions, though statistically rare, planted seeds of constant fear in parents' minds, fundamentally altering their perception of childhood safety. That same year, the government report "A Nation at Risk" warned that American children were falling behind their global peers academically. This sparked educational policies emphasizing standardized testing and increased homework, creating pressure for academic achievement from an early age. Schools began focusing on rote memorization and teaching to tests, competing against students from countries like Singapore, China, and South Korea. Parents, anxious about their children's futures in an increasingly competitive global economy, responded by becoming more involved in their children's education. The self-esteem movement gained significant traction during this period, promoting the idea that children's sense of self-worth should be protected and nurtured above all else. Unlike other countries, America uniquely embraced the notion that building children's self-esteem was more important than challenging them with potential failure. Parents began praising children for every small achievement, regardless of actual merit, creating what psychologists would later identify as "hollow self-esteem" - confidence without the competence to support it. Perhaps most tellingly, the concept of the "playdate" emerged around 1984. As more mothers entered the workforce and safety concerns increased, children's unstructured neighborhood play disappeared. Parents began scheduling and supervising play, which had once been the domain of children themselves. Once parents started organizing play, they naturally began observing it, then participating in it. The very nature of childhood play - fundamental to developing problem-solving skills, creativity, and social competence - was fundamentally altered. By 1990, child development researchers Foster Cline and Jim Fay coined the term "helicopter parent" to describe parents who hover over their children in ways that undermine independence. The oldest members of this helicoptered generation turned thirty around 2010 - they are the Millennials who now struggle with adult independence. The parenting revolution that began in the 1980s has produced a generation raised with constant supervision, structured activities, and protection from failure. The consequences of these shifts were profound and far-reaching. Children who once roamed neighborhoods freely became constantly monitored. Parents who once trusted schools and teachers began questioning authority figures and inserting themselves into every aspect of their children's lives. The natural development of resilience, problem-solving, and independence - once the hallmarks of growing up - were inadvertently sacrificed in the name of safety and achievement, setting the stage for the challenges that would emerge as these children reached adulthood.

Chapter 2: Mental Health Crisis Among High-Achieving Youth

By the early 2000s, a troubling pattern began emerging among adolescents and young adults from privileged backgrounds. College counseling centers reported unprecedented demand for services, with anxiety and depression rates doubling over a decade. At elite universities, campus mental health services became overwhelmed, with some institutions reporting 25-30% of students seeking psychological help annually. The American College Health Association found that over 84 percent of college students felt overwhelmed by their responsibilities, while nearly 32 percent reported depression so severe it was difficult to function. Psychologist Suniya Luthar's groundbreaking research revealed a counterintuitive reality: children from affluent, high-achieving communities were experiencing higher rates of emotional distress than their less-advantaged peers. Her studies demonstrated that these privileged youth showed significantly elevated rates of substance abuse, anxiety, and depression compared to national norms. The pressure to achieve academically, excel in multiple extracurricular activities, and maintain a perfect outward appearance created what Luthar termed "a perfect storm" for psychological distress. The underlying causes extended beyond simple academic pressure. Clinical psychologists identified a phenomenon they called "existential impotence" - despite impressive resumes, many high-achieving students lacked a sense of agency and purpose. Having been micromanaged through childhood, they excelled at following instructions but struggled with independent decision-making. As psychologist Madeline Levine explains, overparenting deprives children of "the opportunity to be creative, to problem solve, to develop coping skills, to build resilience, to figure out what makes them happy, to figure out who they are." Research established clear connections between overparenting and poor mental health outcomes. A 2006 UCLA study found that parents who take over tasks children could perform independently limit their children's ability to experience "mastery," leading to higher rates of separation anxiety. A 2010 study from the University of Tennessee at Chattanooga discovered that students with helicopter parents were more likely to be medicated for anxiety and depression. Several subsequent studies confirmed these findings, showing that intrusive parenting correlates with diminished well-being, less satisfaction in life, and poorer executive function capabilities. The psychological damage stemmed from several aspects of overparenting. When parents constantly stepped in to solve problems, children never developed confidence in their own abilities. When parents shielded children from failure, children developed an overwhelming fear of disappointing others. When parents dictated every aspect of their children's lives, children never discovered their own interests or developed their own identities. The result was a generation of young adults who appeared successful on paper but struggled with fundamental questions of identity, purpose, and self-worth. The mental health crisis revealed a painful irony: parents who were most determined to ensure their children's success had inadvertently undermined the very qualities necessary for genuine achievement and fulfillment. By trying to clear all obstacles from their children's paths, parents had created the biggest obstacle of all - a lack of confidence in their own capabilities. This realization would eventually spark a reconsideration of parenting approaches and educational priorities, though not before significant damage had been done to a generation caught in the transition.

Chapter 3: Academic Pressure and the College Admissions Arms Race

The college admissions landscape underwent dramatic transformation between 1990 and 2015, evolving from a relatively straightforward process into what many described as an "arms race." Acceptance rates at elite institutions plummeted to single digits as application numbers soared. Stanford's admission rate dropped to 5.02% in 2014, the lowest in the nation. Harvard's acceptance rate fell from 14% in 1990 to below 6% by 2015. This statistical reality - that 95% of applicants to elite schools would be rejected - created tremendous anxiety among students and parents alike. The U.S. News & World Report college rankings, first published in 1983, emerged as a powerful force shaping this transformation. By prioritizing metrics like selectivity, alumni giving, and peer assessment, the rankings created incentives for colleges to reject more applicants and focus on prestige indicators rather than educational quality. Schools competed to improve their rankings by boosting selectivity and test scores, creating a self-perpetuating cycle where the most selective schools became even more selective. Despite criticism from educators about their methodology, these rankings effectively redefined what constituted a "good" college education in the minds of many families. This competitive environment fundamentally altered childhood for many middle and upper-middle-class students. High school was no longer viewed as a time of exploration and growth but as a strategic positioning exercise for college applications. Every activity, grade, and achievement was evaluated for its potential impact on admissions prospects. As one high school senior named Blaike Young described, students began "freaking out about college" as early as fourth grade and spent seven hours on homework some nights as juniors. She lamented the loss of childhood: "You can't have a summer anymore. You have to be working, interning. You can't just enjoy it." The pressure led to troubling behaviors across the educational landscape. Parents did their children's homework, hired expensive tutors, and even wrote college application essays. Students resorted to "academic doping" - using prescription stimulants like Adderall to maintain focus during marathon study sessions. A 2012 study by the Partnership for Drug-Free Kids found that one in four teens believed prescription drugs could be used as study aids. The college admissions arms race had created a culture where the end justified the means, even when those means undermined learning, health, and ethical development. Perhaps most disturbing was how the college admissions arms race distorted the purpose of education itself. Learning became not about intellectual growth or discovery but about strategic positioning for college applications. As author William Deresiewicz writes, "Will we continue to maintain an artificial scarcity of educational resources, then drive our children into terror and despair by making them compete with one another for the spaces that are left?" The pursuit of prestigious college admission had become an end in itself, disconnected from meaningful educational goals or values. The irony at the heart of this system was that it was based on a fundamental misunderstanding. Research by economists Stacy Dale and Alan Krueger found that students admitted to highly selective colleges but who chose to attend less selective institutions had similar earnings and career outcomes to their peers at elite schools. There are approximately 2,800 accredited four-year colleges in the United States, many offering excellent education. Success in life correlates far more with how students engage with their education than with the prestige of the institution they attend. This insight would eventually inform efforts to reform the system, though not before an entire generation had been shaped by its pressures.

Chapter 4: Life Skills Deficit: The Unprepared Generation

By the mid-2010s, a troubling pattern emerged across college campuses and workplaces: young adults from privileged backgrounds demonstrating significant deficits in basic life skills. University administrators reported freshmen unable to handle roommate conflicts, manage their time, or solve routine problems without parental intervention. Residence life staff observed students struggling with laundry, basic cooking, and personal organization. Emergency room physicians reported college students having emotional breakdowns over minor illnesses because they'd never learned to cope with discomfort. AAA executives described young drivers as helpless when facing car troubles, expecting immediate solutions rather than basic roadside assistance. This phenomenon represented the culmination of childhood experiences where parents had managed nearly every aspect of daily life. Children who had never been allowed to walk to school alone, resolve peer conflicts independently, or experience natural consequences for forgotten responsibilities grew into young adults lacking fundamental competencies. As psychotherapist Beth Gagnon observed, many parents were still cutting their twelve-year-olds' meat. These children grew into young adults who expected others - particularly their parents - to manage their lives. The workplace impact proved equally significant. Employers reported new graduates requiring unprecedented levels of guidance and support. Human resource professionals described young employees as excellent at following explicit instructions but paralyzed when asked to innovate or figure things out independently. As one employer explained, "Their mind-set is, 'Tell me what the path is and I'll follow it, even if it's really hard. But strike out on my own and figure it out? That I can't do.'" Some companies observed parents calling managers to discuss their adult children's performance reviews or salary negotiations - a phenomenon unheard of in previous generations. Research by psychologist Barbara Lerner revealed that the development of executive function - the cognitive skills needed for planning, prioritizing, and self-regulation - requires practice through independent experiences during childhood and adolescence. Children constantly supervised and directed by adults have fewer opportunities to develop these neural pathways. Neurological studies confirmed that overparented children showed delayed development in brain regions associated with decision-making and emotional regulation, creating a biological basis for the observed skill deficits. The financial implications extended beyond professional competence. Young adults who had never managed money, budgeted, or experienced financial constraints often struggled with basic financial literacy. College financial aid officers reported students unable to complete paperwork independently, understand loan terms, or make informed financial decisions. This created vulnerability to debt problems and financial mismanagement that could impact their lives for decades. Perhaps most fundamentally, many young adults lacked what psychologists call "self-efficacy" - the belief in one's ability to accomplish tasks and overcome challenges. Having been rescued from difficulties throughout childhood, they had limited experience with struggle and recovery. This created a fragile sense of competence easily shattered by inevitable adult challenges. The life skills deficit revealed a profound paradox: parents who had devoted extraordinary resources to ensuring their children's success had inadvertently undermined the very capabilities needed for genuine independence and achievement. The most heavily invested-in generation had become, in many ways, the least prepared for adult challenges.

Chapter 5: Study Drugs and Performance Enhancement Culture

The mid-2000s witnessed an alarming trend emerging on high school and college campuses: the widespread misuse of prescription stimulants as "study drugs." What began as isolated incidents evolved into a pervasive phenomenon by 2010. Medications like Adderall, Ritalin, and Vyvanse - originally prescribed for attention deficit hyperactivity disorder (ADHD) - became the performance enhancers of choice for academically stressed students. National surveys revealed that up to 35% of college students reported using stimulants non-medically, with rates approaching 50% at highly competitive institutions. The pathway to stimulant abuse typically began with academic pressure. Students facing overwhelming workloads, competitive environments, and sleep deprivation discovered that these medications could provide hours of focused concentration and suppress fatigue. As one recent college graduate described, "Everyone I know has a friend who is prescribed this stuff. Every friend group has at least one person with a prescription." Students shared these medications during finals or when facing major assignments, seeing it as a necessary tool for survival in a hypercompetitive environment. Initially used for emergency situations like final exams, usage patterns often escalated to regular dependence. Parents unwittingly contributed to this trend through what medical professionals termed "academic doping." Pediatricians reported increasing requests from parents seeking ADHD diagnoses for children without clear symptoms, hoping medication would improve academic performance. The diagnostic rate for ADHD increased by 41% in the decade from 2003-2013, far exceeding the expected prevalence of the condition. The author shares her own dilemma when her son was diagnosed with ADHD in fourth grade - whether to medicate him to help with homework struggles or focus on developing alternative coping strategies. The consequences extended beyond physical health risks. Students developed psychological dependence, believing they couldn't perform adequately without chemical assistance. This undermined their sense of authentic accomplishment and self-efficacy. As one college junior explained: "I don't even know what my real abilities are anymore. I've been on Adderall so long I can't tell what's me and what's the drug." This pharmaceutical crutch prevented students from developing sustainable work habits and genuine resilience, creating patterns of dependency that often persisted into adulthood. Stimulants represented just one facet of a broader substance abuse pattern among privileged youth. Research by psychologist Suniya Luthar found that affluent teenagers had significantly higher rates of alcohol and marijuana use than national averages, often using substances to self-medicate against stress and anxiety. By college, many had developed sophisticated patterns of substance use - stimulants for studying, alcohol and marijuana for relaxation, and sometimes benzodiazepines for sleep. This cycle created dangerous patterns of dependence that reflected deeper issues with coping and self-regulation. The normalization of performance-enhancing substances reflected a fundamental shift in how success was understood. Achievement had become divorced from the process of learning and growth, reduced instead to measurable outcomes at any cost. Students internalized the message that the end justified the means, even when those means involved pharmaceutical shortcuts. This represented a profound ethical compromise that extended beyond academics into broader questions about identity, authenticity, and what constitutes meaningful accomplishment - questions that would eventually prompt a reconsideration of educational values and priorities.

Chapter 6: Building Resilience Through Natural Consequences

The concept of resilience - the ability to recover from setbacks and adapt to challenges - emerged as a critical focus in child development research during the 2010s. Studies consistently demonstrated that resilience develops not through protection from difficulties but through supported experiences with manageable challenges. Children who face age-appropriate struggles and learn to overcome them develop psychological resources that serve them throughout life. This understanding represented a fundamental shift from previous parenting approaches focused on removing obstacles from children's paths. Developmental psychologists identified several key components of resilience-building experiences. First, children need opportunities to make decisions and experience the natural consequences of those choices. When a child forgets homework and receives a poor grade, or misses a deadline and loses an opportunity, they learn cause-and-effect relationships that build responsibility. As psychologist Karen Able explains, "When children aren't given the space to struggle through things on their own, they don't learn to problem solve very well. They don't learn to be confident in their own abilities." Parents who routinely rescue children from such consequences inadvertently teach them that someone else will always solve their problems. The research of psychologist Carol Dweck proved particularly influential in understanding resilience development. Her work on "growth mindset" demonstrated that children who view abilities as developable through effort, rather than fixed traits, show greater persistence in the face of challenges. Children praised for effort rather than intelligence develop this growth mindset, while those consistently told they are "smart" or "talented" often avoid challenges that might disprove these labels. This insight transformed understanding of how adult feedback shapes children's resilience and approach to difficulty. Practical applications of resilience research emerged in various settings. Schools began implementing programs that deliberately incorporated struggle into learning experiences, teaching students to view mistakes as valuable feedback rather than failures. Family therapists developed protocols to help parents distinguish between productive struggle (which builds capacity) and overwhelming challenges (which require intervention). The concept of "scaffolding" - providing just enough support while gradually transferring responsibility to the child - became a cornerstone of effective parenting approaches. Counterintuitively, research revealed that children from disadvantaged backgrounds often developed stronger resilience than their privileged peers. Having faced authentic challenges with less protection, they had more opportunities to develop coping skills and self-efficacy. As one researcher noted: "Privilege can be a developmental disadvantage when it shields children from the very experiences that build character and capability." This insight challenged fundamental assumptions about what constitutes advantageous childhood circumstances and prompted a reconsideration of overprotective parenting approaches. The resilience framework offered a path forward for parents caught in overparenting patterns. Rather than focusing solely on achievement outcomes, parents could prioritize developing their children's internal resources - problem-solving abilities, emotional regulation, and perseverance. This approach required tolerating children's temporary discomfort as they navigated challenges, a difficult shift for parents accustomed to smoothing their children's paths. However, the long-term benefits - psychologically healthier, more capable young adults - provided compelling motivation for change. The pendulum began swinging away from protection and toward preparation - not through artificial hardship, but through allowing children to experience the natural challenges of growing up with appropriate support.

Chapter 7: Reclaiming Balance: The Return to Authoritative Parenting

The path forward requires understanding different parenting styles and their impacts on child development. In the 1960s, psychologist Diana Baumrind identified three distinct approaches to parenting, later expanded to four: authoritarian (demanding but unresponsive), permissive/indulgent (responsive but undemanding), neglectful (neither demanding nor responsive), and authoritative (both demanding and responsive). This framework provides valuable insight into how different parenting approaches shape children's development and outcomes. Helicopter parenting typically combines elements of authoritarian and permissive styles. Some helicopter parents are authoritarian, directing every aspect of their children's lives with little regard for the children's own interests. Others are permissive, protecting children from all discomfort and advocating for them against any authority figure. Both approaches, though seemingly opposite, prevent children from developing the independence and resilience needed for adulthood. As one mother admitted, "I take my parenting to the extreme. It is personal for me and if they don't get that sense of confidence and limitlessness I will feel I failed them as a parent." This ego-driven parenting places tremendous pressure on both parent and child. The authoritative style represents what researcher Amanda Ripley calls "the sweet spot" in parenting. Authoritative parents set high standards and enforce rules, but they also explain their reasoning and treat children as independent, rational beings. They are emotionally warm and responsive to their children's needs, but they don't shield them from appropriate consequences. Research consistently shows that children raised by authoritative parents have higher academic achievement, fewer symptoms of depression, and fewer behavioral problems. This balanced approach provides both the structure and freedom children need to develop into capable, resilient adults. Shifting to authoritative parenting means accepting that we cannot control every aspect of our children's lives. It means trusting that children can learn from mistakes and develop resilience through facing challenges. It means recognizing that our children are separate beings with their own paths to follow, not extensions of ourselves or projects to perfect. As Johann Wolfgang von Goethe observed: "There are two things children should get from their parents: roots and wings." Authoritative parenting provides both - the security of clear boundaries and expectations, and the freedom to develop independence. The mental health toll of overparenting affects parents as well as children. American parents are depressed at twice the rate of the general population. A 2012 study found that mothers who adopt an "intensive parenting attitude" have lower life satisfaction and higher rates of stress and depression. Many parents describe feeling constantly exhausted yet unable to step back for fear of harming their children's prospects. Reclaiming parental well-being requires recognizing that we are still individuals with our own needs, interests, and identities - not just facilitators of our children's lives. Practical steps toward reclaiming balance include giving children unstructured time for free play and exploration, gradually transferring responsibility for life skills, tolerating the discomfort of watching children struggle with manageable challenges, and focusing on character development rather than achievement alone. Parents can help children navigate the college admissions process by encouraging them to find schools that match their genuine interests rather than chasing prestige. Most importantly, they can demonstrate through their own attitudes that a person's worth is not determined by external achievements but by character, values, and contribution. This balanced approach offers the best chance for raising children who will thrive as adults in an increasingly complex world.

Summary

The historical journey of modern parenting reveals a fundamental paradox at the heart of our approach to raising children. Beginning in the 1980s with heightened safety concerns and competitive academic pressures, well-intentioned parents increasingly managed their children's lives, removing obstacles and engineering outcomes. This approach, while driven by love and concern, inadvertently undermined the very qualities needed for genuine success: resilience, self-efficacy, and intrinsic motivation. The resulting contradiction - privileged children with impressive achievements but fragile psychological foundations - represents one of the most significant developmental challenges of our era. The lessons from this historical examination offer clear guidance for moving forward. Children develop capability through supported struggle, not through having challenges removed. The natural consequences of age-appropriate choices build the executive function and emotional regulation essential for adult functioning. Genuine success emerges from intrinsic motivation and authentic engagement rather than external pressure and achievement for its own sake. Children need space to discover their own interests and develop their own standards of excellence. Finally, the parent-child relationship functions best when it evolves toward increasing autonomy rather than remaining fixed in patterns of dependence. Parents serve children best not by doing for them, but by gradually empowering them to do for themselves. By balancing structure with freedom, support with independence, we give our children both roots and wings - the foundation they need to build meaningful, successful adult lives in an increasingly complex world.

About Author

Loading...

Julie Lythcott-Haims

Read more

Related Books by Julie Lythcott-Haims

Loading...

Your Turn

Julie Lythcott-Haims

How to Be an Adult

★★★½☆3.8