How to Think Like a Roman Emperor

How to Think Like a Roman Emperor Plot Summary

Introduction

Have you ever wondered how ancient wisdom might help you overcome modern challenges? Stoicism, a philosophical framework developed over two millennia ago, offers surprisingly relevant tools for managing emotions, building resilience, and finding tranquility in our chaotic world. The Stoic approach isn't about suppressing feelings or maintaining a stiff upper lip—rather, it's a sophisticated system for understanding the relationship between our thoughts and emotions, and developing practical techniques to respond to life's difficulties with wisdom and equanimity. The Roman emperor Marcus Aurelius, despite ruling one of history's greatest empires during times of plague, war, and personal tragedy, managed to maintain remarkable psychological balance through his Stoic practice. His personal journal, later published as "Meditations," reveals how he applied Stoic principles to overcome anger, anxiety, grief, and the countless pressures of leadership. By examining his life and writings, we gain access to time-tested cognitive strategies that parallel modern psychological approaches. Through this philosophical lens, we can learn to distinguish between what we can and cannot control, transform obstacles into opportunities, cultivate emotional resilience, and ultimately develop a more meaningful relationship with our own mortality.

Chapter 1: The Stoic Philosophy of Marcus Aurelius

The Stoic philosophy embraced by Marcus Aurelius represents a comprehensive approach to life that prioritizes virtue, reason, and the acceptance of nature's course. At its core, Stoicism teaches that true happiness comes not from external circumstances but from developing excellence of character. For Marcus, this philosophy wasn't merely theoretical—it was a practical framework that guided his decisions as emperor and helped him navigate personal hardships including chronic illness, the deaths of several children, and the constant pressures of imperial leadership. Central to Marcus's Stoicism is the distinction between what is within our control and what isn't. The Stoics believed that the only things truly under our control are our own judgments, intentions, and actions—everything else falls into the category of "externals" that we may prefer but shouldn't depend upon for our wellbeing. This fundamental principle allowed Marcus to maintain equanimity even when facing war, plague, or betrayal, as he focused his energy on responding virtuously rather than lamenting circumstances beyond his influence. The Stoic worldview sees the universe as a rational, ordered system governed by natural laws. Humans, as rational beings, are considered part of this cosmic order and capable of aligning themselves with nature through reason. Marcus frequently reminded himself of this perspective, viewing human affairs from a cosmic viewpoint that diminished the significance of temporary setbacks. This "view from above" technique helped him maintain perspective when faced with seemingly overwhelming problems. For Marcus, philosophy wasn't an academic exercise but a form of spiritual and psychological training. He practiced daily meditations, self-examination, and contemplative exercises designed to strengthen his character and prepare him for life's challenges. These included morning preparations for the day's difficulties, evening reflections on his conduct, and visualization exercises to reinforce Stoic principles. By repeatedly rehearsing these mental practices, Marcus developed psychological habits that allowed him to respond to events with wisdom rather than reactive emotion. The practical value of Marcus's Stoicism lies in its focus on character development rather than external achievement. While most leadership philosophies emphasize results, Stoicism measures success by one's adherence to virtue—wisdom, justice, courage, and moderation. This approach freed Marcus from the anxiety of controlling outcomes and allowed him to focus on making the best possible decisions given the circumstances. In today's world of constant pressure and uncertainty, this ancient wisdom offers a refreshing alternative to result-oriented thinking, showing how we might find tranquility through focusing on what truly matters: our own character and conduct.

Chapter 2: Cognitive Distancing and Objective Representation

Cognitive distancing is a cornerstone of Stoic psychology that involves creating mental space between oneself and one's thoughts or impressions. Marcus Aurelius practiced this technique extensively, repeatedly reminding himself that it's not events themselves that disturb us, but rather our judgments about those events. This principle, articulated by Epictetus as "Men are disturbed not by things, but by their judgments about things," forms the foundation of the Stoic approach to emotional regulation and bears striking similarity to modern cognitive therapy. The process involves recognizing that our perceptions are not objective reality but interpretations filtered through our beliefs and expectations. When we experience an upsetting event, Stoics advise pausing to separate the bare facts from our value judgments about those facts. Marcus would often remind himself to strip away dramatic language and emotional reactions to see situations more objectively. For example, rather than thinking "This is a terrible catastrophe!" he would reframe it as "This is a situation that appears challenging but is ultimately indifferent to my true good, which lies in my own virtue." This technique was formalized in Stoicism as "objective representation" (phantasia kataleptike), which involves describing events in plain, factual language without emotional coloring. When facing criticism, for instance, Marcus would tell himself, "Someone has expressed a negative opinion" rather than "I have been terribly insulted." This linguistic shift creates psychological distance that prevents automatic emotional reactions. The Stoics believed this practice allowed one to see reality more clearly and respond with reason rather than passion. Cognitive distancing operates through several mechanisms. First, it interrupts the automatic process by which impressions trigger emotions. Second, it allows for rational evaluation of the impression before responding. Third, it reminds us that our judgments are within our control even when external events are not. Marcus would practice this by mentally "stepping back" from his thoughts, observing them as though they belonged to someone else, and questioning whether they aligned with nature and reason. The practical applications of this technique are remarkably versatile. When facing physical pain, Marcus would separate the sensation itself from judgments about it being "unbearable." When dealing with difficult people, he would distinguish between their actions and his reactions. When confronting death, he would separate the natural process from fearful interpretations. This approach doesn't deny difficulties but transforms our relationship with them, creating space for reasoned response rather than reactive suffering. Modern practitioners might recognize this as similar to mindfulness techniques that encourage observing thoughts without attachment—evidence that this ancient wisdom anticipated contemporary psychological insights by nearly two millennia.

Chapter 3: Mastering Desires Through Value Clarification

Value clarification in Stoic philosophy involves a deliberate examination of what we truly consider important in life, distinguishing between genuine goods and mere preferences. For Marcus Aurelius, this process was essential to mastering desires and achieving tranquility. The Stoics believed that most human suffering stems from valuing external things—wealth, reputation, pleasure—as if they were true goods, when in fact virtue alone deserves that designation. By clarifying these values, we can redirect our desires toward what is genuinely worth pursuing. The Stoic framework divides all things into three categories: good (virtue), bad (vice), and indifferent (everything else). However, among indifferents, some are "preferred" (health, wealth, friendship) while others are "dispreferred" (illness, poverty, isolation). This nuanced approach acknowledges natural preferences while maintaining that external circumstances cannot determine our happiness. Marcus frequently reminded himself that wealth, fame, and even life itself were ultimately indifferent to his true good, which lay entirely in the quality of his character and actions. This value system operates through a process of mental rehearsal and reflection. Marcus would regularly examine his desires, asking whether they aligned with nature and reason. When tempted by luxury or pleasure, he would mentally strip away the glamour by reducing things to their physical components—expensive food becomes "dead animal tissue," fine wine "fermented grape juice." This technique, sometimes called "analytical contemplation," helps reveal the true nature of things beneath our projections and diminishes irrational attachments. The practical implementation of value clarification involves several exercises. One is the "desired versus admired" reflection, where Marcus would contrast what he personally desired with qualities he admired in others. Another is the "morning preparation," where he would anticipate encounters with difficult people or situations and remind himself of his true values before facing them. A third is the "evening review," examining whether his actions throughout the day aligned with his professed values. In modern contexts, this approach offers a powerful antidote to consumerism and social media comparison. By clarifying what truly matters—wisdom, justice, courage, and moderation—we can resist the endless cycle of desire and disappointment that characterizes much of contemporary life. The Stoic practice of value clarification doesn't require renouncing all pleasures or advantages, but rather maintaining proper perspective about their importance. As Marcus wrote, "Very little is needed for a happy life; it is all within yourself, in your way of thinking." This insight remains as liberating today as it was in ancient Rome, offering a path to freedom from the tyranny of misplaced desires.

Chapter 4: Pain Management Through Stoic Acceptance

Stoic pain management represents one of the philosophy's most practical applications, offering techniques that remain remarkably relevant in modern contexts. Marcus Aurelius, who suffered from chronic illness throughout much of his life, developed sophisticated approaches to dealing with physical discomfort that parallel contemporary pain psychology. The cornerstone of this approach is what might be called "Stoic acceptance"—acknowledging pain without resistance while separating the physical sensation from emotional distress. The Stoic framework distinguishes between pain itself (the physical sensation) and suffering (our emotional reaction to pain). While the former may be unavoidable, the latter stems from judgments that pain is terrible, unbearable, or unjust. Marcus practiced cognitive distancing from these judgments, reminding himself that pain, while dispreferred, was ultimately indifferent to his true good. He would tell himself, "The pain is merely a sensation in a part of my body, not something affecting my whole being or my character." This mental separation prevented pain from dominating his consciousness. A key technique in Stoic pain management is what modern therapists might call "objective representation"—describing pain in neutral, factual terms rather than catastrophizing language. Instead of thinking "This pain is unbearable torture," Marcus would observe "There is a sensation of pressure and heat in this location." This linguistic shift helps normalize pain as a natural bodily process rather than a personal affliction. The Stoics also practiced "analytical contemplation" of pain, breaking it down into its components and observing how it fluctuates moment by moment, which diminishes its perceived solidity and permanence. Perhaps most powerfully, Stoicism offers a reframing of pain as an opportunity to exercise virtue. Marcus viewed physical discomfort as a chance to practice courage, patience, and rational acceptance—qualities he valued far more than bodily comfort. He would remind himself that pain could harm his body but not his character unless he allowed it to compromise his values. This perspective transforms pain from a meaningless affliction into a context for demonstrating and developing virtue. The practical value of these techniques extends beyond physical pain to emotional distress and life challenges. When facing the death of loved ones, political setbacks, or betrayal, Marcus applied the same principles: accept what cannot be changed, separate facts from judgments, focus on responding virtuously. Modern pain psychology has independently validated many of these approaches, incorporating acceptance, cognitive reframing, and mindfulness into evidence-based treatments. The Stoic approach reminds us that while we cannot always control our circumstances, we retain the freedom to determine our relationship with them—a powerful insight for anyone facing suffering of any kind.

Chapter 5: Overcoming Anxiety with the Inner Citadel

The concept of the "Inner Citadel" represents the Stoic approach to managing anxiety and maintaining tranquility amid life's uncertainties. For Marcus Aurelius, this metaphorical fortress represented the mind's capacity to remain secure and untroubled regardless of external circumstances. Unlike physical retreats that offer temporary escape, the Inner Citadel provides constant protection through the cultivation of proper judgments and a clear understanding of what lies within our control. At the foundation of this approach is the Stoic distinction between what depends on us and what does not—what modern Stoics often call the "dichotomy of control." Marcus repeatedly reminded himself that external events, others' opinions, and future outcomes lie beyond his direct control, while his judgments, intentions, and actions remain entirely his own. By focusing exclusively on what he could influence, he avoided the anxiety that comes from attempting to control the uncontrollable. This mental discipline creates a psychological space where peace is possible regardless of external turbulence. The Inner Citadel is fortified through several practical techniques. One is the "premeditation of adversity" (praemeditatio malorum), where Marcus would deliberately visualize potential challenges—betrayal, illness, failure—and mentally rehearse facing them with virtue. Rather than increasing anxiety, this practice actually diminishes it by removing the element of surprise and demonstrating that even worst-case scenarios can be met with dignity. Another technique is the "reserve clause" (hupexairesis), appending "fate permitting" to plans and ambitions, acknowledging that outcomes ultimately depend on factors beyond our control. Marcus also employed the "view from above," mentally stepping back to observe human affairs from a cosmic perspective. From this vantage point, personal anxieties appear insignificant against the vastness of time and space. He would contemplate the brevity of human life, the constant flux of existence, and the ultimate insignificance of the very things that typically cause anxiety—wealth, status, reputation. This cosmic perspective doesn't diminish the importance of virtuous action but places our concerns in proper context. The practical value of the Inner Citadel lies in its portability and accessibility. Unlike strategies that require specific circumstances or resources, this mental fortress can be accessed anywhere, anytime. When facing uncertainty about the future, relationship conflicts, or workplace pressures, we can retreat to this internal sanctuary by focusing on what we can control and accepting what we cannot. The result isn't passive resignation but active engagement with life on realistic terms. As Marcus wrote, "You have power over your mind—not outside events. Realize this, and you will find strength." This insight offers a timeless remedy for anxiety in an increasingly uncertain world.

Chapter 6: Conquering Anger with the Ten Gifts of Apollo

The Stoic approach to anger management, which Marcus Aurelius metaphorically described as the "Ten Gifts of Apollo," represents one of the philosophy's most sophisticated psychological frameworks. For the Stoics, anger was considered particularly destructive—a temporary madness that compromises reason and virtue. Marcus, who acknowledged his own struggles with anger, developed systematic techniques to prevent and overcome this emotion, drawing on both philosophical principles and practical exercises. The foundation of Stoic anger management lies in understanding anger's cognitive structure. The Stoics recognized that anger doesn't arise directly from events but from our judgments about those events—specifically, the judgment that we have been wronged and that retaliation is appropriate. Marcus would remind himself that apparent slights and offenses stem from others' ignorance rather than malice, and that responding with anger only compounds the original error. This cognitive reframing interrupts the automatic progression from perception to emotional reaction. Among the specific techniques Marcus employed was the practice of empathy—deliberately considering the perspective of those who provoked his anger. He would remind himself that all humans are social beings designed by nature to cooperate, and that others' mistakes stem from misunderstandings about what is truly good. Another technique involved considering the whole character of the person rather than focusing exclusively on their offensive behavior. By remembering others' virtues alongside their faults, he could maintain a balanced view that prevented excessive anger. Marcus also practiced what modern psychologists might call "temporal distancing"—considering how insignificant current provocations would appear in the broader context of time. He would remind himself that both he and his antagonist would soon be dead and forgotten, making present conflicts seem trivial by comparison. Similarly, he would reflect on his own imperfections, recognizing that he too made errors that might provoke others' anger, which cultivated humility and forgiveness. The practical application of these techniques extends beyond personal relationships to professional contexts, social media interactions, and political disagreements. When faced with provocations, we can pause to consider others' perspectives, recognize our limited knowledge of their motives, and focus on responding constructively rather than retaliating. The Stoic approach doesn't advocate suppressing anger but transforming it through understanding—a process that preserves relationships and mental tranquility. As Marcus wrote, "The best revenge is to be unlike him who performed the injury," offering an alternative to the destructive cycle of anger and retaliation that characterizes much of human interaction.

Chapter 7: Contemplating Death and the View from Above

The Stoic practice of contemplating death represents not a morbid fixation but a profound psychological technique for living more fully and meaningfully. Marcus Aurelius, who faced death constantly through war, plague, and the loss of loved ones, developed sophisticated approaches to mortality that transformed fear into acceptance and even appreciation. Central to this practice is the recognition that death is natural, inevitable, and therefore not to be feared—a perspective that liberates us to focus on living virtuously in the present. The Stoic approach begins with regular meditation on mortality, what the Romans called memento mori ("remember you must die"). Marcus would remind himself daily of life's brevity and unpredictability, not to induce anxiety but to sharpen his appreciation for the present moment and clarify his priorities. By contemplating that each action might be his last, he ensured that he lived deliberately rather than postponing virtue to some imagined future. This practice cuts through procrastination and trivial concerns, focusing attention on what truly matters. Complementing this mortality awareness is the "view from above"—a contemplative exercise where one mentally rises above human affairs to observe them from a cosmic perspective. From this vantage point, individual lives appear momentary, human concerns trivial, and the grand sweep of nature becomes apparent. Marcus would imagine the vastness of space, the brevity of human history, and the constant transformation of matter to remind himself that death is simply part of this natural cycle. This perspective doesn't diminish human experience but contextualizes it within a larger framework. The Stoic approach to death also involves analytical contemplation—examining what death actually is rather than responding to fearful impressions about it. Marcus would remind himself that death is merely the dissolution of elements that once came together, a natural process no different from birth. By stripping away dramatic language and cultural associations, he reduced death to a physical process that, while dispreferred, could be accepted with equanimity. This rational analysis diminishes fear by replacing catastrophic thinking with objective understanding. Perhaps most importantly, Stoic death contemplation transforms our relationship with life itself. By accepting mortality, we free ourselves from the anxiety of trying to preserve and extend life at all costs. Instead, we can focus on living well—expressing virtue, maintaining meaningful relationships, and appreciating each moment. As Marcus wrote, "It is not death that a man should fear, but rather never beginning to live." This insight remains profoundly relevant in our age of death denial and life extension, reminding us that a well-lived life matters more than its duration. The Stoic perspective offers not resignation but liberation—the freedom to live authentically in the face of our inevitable end.

Summary

The enduring wisdom of Stoicism lies in its recognition that true freedom comes not from controlling external circumstances but from mastering our internal responses. Through cognitive distancing, value clarification, acceptance of pain, cultivation of an inner citadel, anger management, and contemplation of mortality, we develop the capacity to maintain tranquility and virtue regardless of what life brings. These ancient practices offer a comprehensive framework for psychological resilience that remains remarkably applicable to modern challenges. The Stoic approach reminds us that philosophy is not merely an academic pursuit but a practical guide for living. By adopting these time-tested techniques, we can transform obstacles into opportunities, respond to provocation with wisdom rather than reaction, and face uncertainty with equanimity. In a world increasingly characterized by distraction, division, and anxiety, thinking like a Roman emperor offers a path to something increasingly rare: the freedom to determine our own mental state regardless of external conditions. This sovereignty over our own minds may be the most valuable freedom of all.

About Author

Loading...

Donald J. Robertson

Read more