Incognito

Incognito Plot Summary

Introduction

Imagine looking at a beautiful sunset. The vibrant colors, the gradual fading of light, the silhouettes against the horizon - all seem to be directly perceived by your eyes. Yet this seemingly simple experience involves an extraordinary feat of neural engineering. What you experience as reality is actually a carefully constructed simulation created by your brain, which processes raw sensory data through trillions of neural connections to produce your conscious experience. Your brain, weighing just three pounds, contains roughly 86 billion neurons, each connected to thousands of others. This intricate network processes an estimated 11 million bits of information every second, yet your conscious awareness handles only about 50 bits per second. This means that the vast majority of your brain's activity happens beneath your awareness. This book explores this hidden universe - how your brain constructs your perception of reality, makes decisions before you're consciously aware of them, and shapes your thoughts, feelings, and behaviors through mechanisms that operate largely outside your conscious control. Understanding these processes not only reveals fascinating insights about human nature but also challenges fundamental assumptions about perception, free will, and the nature of consciousness itself.

Chapter 1: The Brain's Democracy: Competing Neural Systems

Your brain is not the unified command center we often imagine it to be. Instead, it functions more like a democracy with competing political parties, each vying for control of your thoughts and actions. This team-of-rivals framework helps explain many puzzling aspects of human behavior and consciousness. The division begins with the physical structure of the brain itself. The two hemispheres look almost identical anatomically, yet they process information differently. The left hemisphere typically excels at logical, sequential processing and language, while the right hemisphere specializes in spatial relationships and emotional context. These hemispheres communicate through the corpus callosum, a bundle of nerve fibers that allows them to share information and coordinate activities. In rare cases where this connection is severed (split-brain patients), researchers observe what appears to be two separate consciousnesses operating within one skull - each with its own perceptions, desires, and intentions. Beyond the hemispheres, the brain contains numerous subsystems with overlapping domains. Consider memory: we don't have just one memory system but multiple ones. The hippocampus consolidates everyday experiences into explicit memories we can consciously recall, while the amygdala creates emotional memories that can trigger responses without conscious recollection. The cerebellum stores procedural memories for skills like riding a bicycle, which operate automatically once learned. These systems work in parallel, sometimes cooperating and sometimes competing. This democratic structure is particularly evident in decision-making. When faced with temptation - whether chocolate cake, alcohol, or an impulsive purchase - we experience an internal conflict between immediate gratification and long-term goals. Brain imaging studies reveal that these conflicts activate different neural regions: the limbic system responds to immediate rewards, while the prefrontal cortex considers long-term consequences. The outcome of this neural vote determines our behavior. Sometimes the immediate-reward party wins, and we indulge; other times, the long-term planning coalition prevails, and we resist temptation. Understanding the brain as a neural democracy rather than a monarchy helps explain phenomena like internal conflict, self-control challenges, and the remarkable adaptability of human cognition. It suggests that mental health might be viewed not as the dominance of one neural system over others, but as a balanced conversation among different brain regions, each contributing its specialized perspective to the collective decision. This framework also explains why we sometimes feel like strangers to ourselves - different neural coalitions can gain control at different times, leading to seemingly inconsistent behaviors and preferences.

Chapter 2: The Illusion of Perception: How We Construct Reality

Our perception of reality seems straightforward - we open our eyes and see the world as it is. But this intuition is profoundly misleading. What we experience as reality is actually a carefully constructed simulation created by our brains, optimized for survival rather than accuracy. Consider vision: about one-third of the human brain is devoted to processing visual information, yet we're conscious of only a tiny portion of this work. The fovea, the high-resolution center of our retina, covers just about 1% of our visual field - approximately the size of your thumbnail held at arm's length. Everything outside this small area is seen with dramatically lower resolution. Yet we don't experience the world as blurry beyond this central point because our brains create the illusion of seeing everything clearly. Our visual system constantly makes predictions about what should be in our peripheral vision based on context and past experience, filling in details without our awareness. This filling-in happens constantly. Each of our eyes has a blind spot where the optic nerve connects to the retina, creating a hole in our visual field the size of seventeen moons in the night sky. Yet we never notice this gap because our brain seamlessly completes the picture. Similarly, when we see a waterfall for a few minutes and then look at stationary rocks, they appear to crawl upward even though they haven't moved - revealing how our brain constructs motion independently of position. Our experience of time is equally constructed. When you snap your fingers, your perception of this action lags behind reality because neural processing takes time. Your brain edits and synchronizes information from different senses that process at different speeds, creating a coherent but delayed experience. This explains why when you look at a clock, the second hand sometimes appears to freeze momentarily before ticking normally - your brain is adjusting its time perception. The constructed nature of perception becomes evident in phenomena like change blindness, where people fail to notice significant changes in scenes when they occur during eye movements or brief interruptions. In one famous experiment, a researcher asking directions was secretly switched with another person during a momentary distraction - and most participants didn't notice they were speaking to an entirely different individual! This demonstrates how our brains create simplified models of reality rather than processing every detail. These illusions reveal a profound truth: we don't passively record reality; we actively construct it. Our brains evolved not to perceive the world with perfect accuracy but to create useful interpretations that help us survive. As neuroscientist Anil Seth puts it, we're all "hallucinating all the time, and when we agree about our hallucinations, we call that reality."

Chapter 3: Beyond Awareness: The Unconscious Mind at Work

Try this simple exercise: close your eyes and imagine changing lanes while driving. Most people visualize turning the steering wheel right and then straightening it out. But this is completely wrong - the correct motion involves turning right, then left, then straightening. Despite performing this action flawlessly while driving, we cannot consciously access how we do it. This gap between what our brains know and what our conscious minds can access is enormous. This phenomenon, called procedural memory, is just one example of implicit knowledge - information your brain holds that your conscious mind cannot explicitly access. Professional chicken sexers can instantly determine the gender of day-old chicks but cannot explain how they do it. World War II aircraft spotters could identify enemy planes in seconds but couldn't articulate their methods. In both cases, experts learned through practice and feedback, developing skills that operated below conscious awareness. Our unconscious mind influences us in surprising ways. Studies show people named Dennis or Denise are disproportionately likely to become dentists, while those named Laura or Lawrence gravitate toward law. People tend to marry others with the same first initial as themselves. When rating attractiveness, we find briefly glimpsed people more beautiful than those we examine carefully. None of these influences reach conscious awareness - we simply feel drawn toward certain choices without knowing why. Perhaps most striking is how our unconscious shapes moral judgments and social attitudes. In implicit association tests, people show unconscious biases they would consciously reject. Our brains form associations between concepts without our awareness, and these hidden connections influence our perceptions and decisions. When asked to explain our choices, we construct plausible narratives that may have little to do with the actual neural processes involved. This doesn't mean we're being dishonest - we simply lack direct access to the machinery generating our thoughts and actions. The unconscious mind isn't a primitive remnant of our evolutionary past but a sophisticated system that handles complex computations too demanding for consciousness. When a professional tennis player returns a serve traveling at 140 miles per hour, there's simply no time for conscious deliberation. The ball reaches the player in about 500 milliseconds, while conscious processing takes at least that long to engage. The player's body must react before consciousness can even register what's happening. Understanding the hidden machinery of the mind doesn't diminish human experience but enriches it. By recognizing the sophisticated processes operating beneath awareness, we gain insight into both our capabilities and limitations, potentially allowing us to work more effectively with our own neural architecture rather than against it.

Chapter 4: The Myth of Free Will: Neural Determinism

The notion that we consciously control our decisions and actions is deeply ingrained in human experience. We feel as though we deliberate, choose, and then act. However, neuroscience reveals a more complex reality: many of our actions and decisions occur before we become consciously aware of them. In groundbreaking experiments conducted in the 1980s, neuroscientist Benjamin Libet asked participants to perform a simple action - lifting a finger - whenever they felt the urge to do so. Participants watched a high-resolution timer and noted exactly when they became aware of their decision to move. Surprisingly, Libet discovered that brain activity related to the movement (called the "readiness potential") began about 350 milliseconds before participants reported feeling the urge to move. In other words, the brain was preparing for action well before conscious awareness kicked in. More recent studies using brain imaging have extended this finding. In one experiment, researchers could predict which button participants would press up to seven seconds before they felt they had made the decision. This suggests that our conscious experience of decision-making may be more like receiving news about decisions already made by unconscious brain processes rather than initiating those decisions. The brain appears to work behind the scenes - developing neural coalitions and planning actions - before we become consciously aware of our intentions. Further evidence comes from split-brain patients, whose corpus callosum (the connection between brain hemispheres) has been severed. When researchers show an image to only the right hemisphere, which lacks language capabilities, the patient's left hand might respond appropriately by selecting a related object. When asked why they chose that object, the left hemisphere (which controls speech but didn't see the image) confidently invents a plausible explanation rather than admitting ignorance. Our conscious minds seem programmed to create coherent narratives about our actions, even when those narratives are demonstrably false. This doesn't mean free will is entirely an illusion. Some neuroscientists suggest we might retain a form of "free won't" - the ability to veto impulses that arise unconsciously. However, even this veto power may itself be the product of unconscious neural activity. The question remains open and deeply challenging to our intuitive sense of agency. The implications extend beyond philosophy into practical domains like law and ethics. If our actions are largely determined by brain processes outside conscious control, how should we think about moral responsibility? This doesn't necessarily mean abandoning concepts of responsibility altogether, but it does suggest we need more nuanced approaches that acknowledge the complex relationship between conscious awareness and behavior.

Chapter 5: Neuroplasticity: Rewiring Your Brain Through Experience

The brain is not a static organ but a dynamic system that continuously reorganizes itself in response to experience. This remarkable capacity for change, known as neuroplasticity, challenges traditional views of the brain as hardwired and immutable after early development. Neuroplasticity operates through multiple mechanisms. When we learn new skills, neurons that fire together strengthen their connections through a process called Hebbian plasticity, captured in the phrase "neurons that fire together, wire together." With practice, neural circuits become more efficient, requiring less energy and conscious effort. This explains why learning to drive or play an instrument initially demands intense concentration but eventually becomes automatic. Brain imaging studies show that novices at any task use significantly more neural resources than experts. As skills become automated, the brain becomes more efficient, requiring less energy and conscious oversight. The brain's plasticity extends beyond strengthening existing connections to creating entirely new neural pathways. In one groundbreaking study, researchers taught blind participants to "see" using their tongues. Participants wore cameras connected to electrode arrays placed on their tongues, which translated visual information into patterns of mild electrical stimulation. After training, participants could identify objects and navigate spaces using this sensory substitution system. Their visual cortex, normally devoted to processing information from the eyes, repurposed itself to interpret signals from the tongue. Similar reorganization occurs following injury. Stroke patients who lose function in one part of the brain can sometimes recover as neighboring regions assume the lost functions. This recovery depends on intensive rehabilitation that forces the brain to create new neural pathways. The phrase "use it or lose it" applies literally to neural connections - pathways that aren't regularly activated weaken and may eventually disappear, while those frequently used become stronger and more efficient. Neuroplasticity operates throughout life, though its nature changes with age. Young brains exhibit extraordinary plasticity, allowing children to recover from injuries that would permanently disable adults. However, even older brains retain significant capacity for change. Studies of London taxi drivers revealed that their hippocampi - brain regions involved in spatial navigation - grew larger as they memorized the city's complex street layout, demonstrating structural plasticity in adult brains. The implications of neuroplasticity extend beyond recovery from injury to enhancement of normal function. Meditation practices have been shown to increase gray matter density in regions associated with attention and emotional regulation. Cognitive training can improve specific mental abilities, though the transfer to untrained tasks remains controversial. Even physical exercise promotes brain health by increasing blood flow and stimulating the production of growth factors that support neuronal survival and connectivity.

Chapter 6: The Responsible Brain: Neuroscience and Legal Implications

When Charles Whitman climbed the University of Texas Tower in 1966 and killed 13 people in a shooting rampage, he left behind a note requesting an autopsy of his brain. He suspected something had changed in his neural circuitry, causing his violent impulses. The autopsy revealed a brain tumor pressing against his amygdala, a region involved in emotional regulation, particularly fear and aggression. Whitman's intuition about his brain was correct. This case raises profound questions about responsibility and culpability. If Whitman's behavior resulted from a brain tumor - something outside his control - should we view his actions differently? Similar questions arise in other cases where brain abnormalities correlate with behavioral changes. Consider the case of a 40-year-old man who suddenly developed pedophilic urges, only to have them disappear after surgeons removed a tumor from his orbitofrontal cortex. When the urges returned months later, doctors discovered the tumor had regrown. Our legal system traditionally distinguishes between those who commit crimes with a "guilty mind" (mens rea) and those whose actions result from recognized medical conditions. We don't blame someone for actions during an epileptic seizure or while sleepwalking because we understand these behaviors aren't under conscious control. But neuroscience increasingly suggests that this bright line between "normal" and "abnormal" brains may be artificial. Brain function can be altered in countless ways - through tumors, strokes, neurodegenerative diseases, developmental abnormalities, or subtle genetic variations. Even common medications can dramatically change behavior, as seen when some Parkinson's patients developed gambling addictions after taking dopamine-enhancing drugs. These cases demonstrate that behavior cannot be separated from biology; changes in the brain lead to changes in decision-making and impulse control. This understanding creates a dilemma for our legal system. Currently, defendants with detectable brain abnormalities may receive leniency, while those without obvious neural problems face full punishment. But this approach depends on the limitations of current technology rather than meaningful differences in culpability. As neuroimaging and genetic testing advance, we may discover biological explanations for behaviors currently attributed to "free choice." A more forward-looking approach would focus less on assigning blame for past actions and more on assessing risk of future harm. This might include evidence-based sentencing that considers factors predictive of reoffending and rehabilitation programs targeting specific neural mechanisms, such as strengthening prefrontal circuits involved in impulse control. Such approaches acknowledge biological realities while still protecting society. This shift doesn't mean excusing harmful behavior. Rather, it means developing a more sophisticated understanding of human action that incorporates neuroscientific knowledge while maintaining social order. The goal isn't to eliminate responsibility but to ground it in biological reality rather than outdated notions of free will that neuroscience increasingly challenges.

Summary

The brain's operation fundamentally challenges our intuitive understanding of ourselves. Far from being the conscious captains of our mental ships, we are largely passengers observing the journey. Our conscious awareness represents only a tiny fraction of the brain's activity - a CEO receiving simplified reports rather than micromanaging every operation. The vast majority of neural processing occurs beneath awareness, from basic perception to complex decision-making. What we experience as reality is not a faithful recording of the external world but a useful simulation constructed by our brains, optimized for survival rather than accuracy. This revelation doesn't diminish human experience but enriches it. Understanding the brain as a team of rivals - a neural democracy with competing factions rather than a monarchy with a single ruler - helps explain our internal conflicts, inconsistencies, and remarkable resilience. It suggests new approaches to education, mental health, and legal systems that work with our neural architecture rather than against it. The brain's plasticity offers hope that we can reshape our neural pathways throughout life, while its predictive nature explains both our cognitive limitations and our creative capacities. As we continue exploring this inner cosmos, we might ask: How can we use this knowledge to design environments, technologies, and practices that better align with our neural realities? How might our social institutions evolve if they fully incorporated our understanding of the brain's hidden operations? These questions point toward a future where neuroscience not only reveals the mechanics of mind but helps us create more fulfilling, compassionate, and effective ways of living.

About Author

Loading...

David Eagleman

David Eagleman is an internationally bestselling author, a TED speaker, and a Guggenheim Fellow. He teaches neuroscience at Stanford University and is CEO of a neurotech startup, Neosensory. At night he writes. His books have been translated into 33 languages.

Read more

Related Books by David Eagleman

Loading...

The Brain

David Eagleman

The Story of You

★★★★☆4.4

Loading...

Livewired

David Eagleman

The Inside Story of the Ever-Changing Brain

★★★★☆4.2

Loading...

The Runaway Species

David Eagleman

How Human Creativity Remakes the World

★★★½☆3.8