Lateral Thinking

Lateral Thinking Plot Summary

Introduction

In a world dominated by logical, vertical thinking, where each step must be correct, we often find ourselves trapped in established patterns of thought. But what if there were another way to approach problems, a way that embraces uncertainty and uses information not just for its own sake but for its provocative effect? This is where lateral thinking enters the picture—a deliberate process for escaping rigid thought patterns and generating creative solutions. The human mind functions as a pattern-making system, organizing information into recognizable sequences that become increasingly rigid over time. While these patterns allow us to navigate the world efficiently, they also imprison us in habitual ways of thinking. Lateral thinking provides the tools to break out of these prisons, not by replacing vertical thinking but by complementing it. Through techniques like challenging assumptions, generating alternatives, and intentional provocation, lateral thinking helps us restructure our perceptual frameworks and make better use of information that is already available to us.

Chapter 1: The Nature of Mind as a Pattern-Making System

The mind operates fundamentally as a pattern-making system. It creates patterns from experiences, recognizes these patterns in new situations, and becomes increasingly efficient at using them. This pattern-making ability forms the foundation of our thinking process and represents both the mind's greatest strength and its most significant limitation. When information enters the mind, it forms patterns based on the sequence of arrival. Think of it like rain falling on a jelly surface—each drop leaves an impression, and subsequent drops tend to follow the channels already formed. Similarly, our thought patterns become established through experience and then direct future thinking along the same pathways. This self-maximizing system creates stable thought patterns that become increasingly difficult to change. The limited attention span of the mind contributes significantly to this pattern rigidity. At any moment, we can only focus on a small portion of available information. The area that receives attention is typically the most familiar pattern, the one that has been used most frequently. This creates a self-reinforcing cycle: familiar patterns receive attention, which makes them even more familiar and likely to be used again. While this pattern-making efficiency allows us to navigate complex environments quickly, it comes with inherent disadvantages. Established patterns resist change, making it difficult to restructure information in new ways. Information arranged as part of one pattern cannot easily be used as part of a different pattern. There's also a tendency toward "centering," where anything resembling a standard pattern is perceived as that pattern, and toward polarization, where thinking moves to extremes rather than maintaining balanced viewpoints. These limitations explain why insight and humor share a similar mechanism—both involve the sudden restructuring of patterns. When a joke leads us down one expected pattern and then abruptly switches to another, we laugh at this pattern disruption. Similarly, when we experience an "aha moment" in problem-solving, we've successfully escaped an established pattern to see the situation differently. The purpose of lateral thinking is to deliberately facilitate these pattern-breaking insights.

Chapter 2: Vertical vs. Lateral Thinking Approaches

Vertical thinking and lateral thinking represent two fundamentally different approaches to processing information. While vertical thinking proceeds logically and sequentially, lateral thinking moves laterally to explore different perceptual frameworks. Understanding their differences is crucial for knowing when and how to apply each approach. Vertical thinking is selective; lateral thinking is generative. In vertical thinking, we select the most promising approach and follow it through to conclusion. In lateral thinking, we generate as many alternative approaches as possible, even after finding a promising one. Vertical thinking focuses on what is relevant; lateral thinking deliberately seeks out what might appear irrelevant as potential sources of new insights. The movement patterns of these thinking styles also differ significantly. Vertical thinking moves only if there is a clear direction toward a solution, like following a path to a specific destination. Lateral thinking moves for the sake of movement itself, exploring without knowing exactly what it's looking for. As the lateral thinker says, "I am looking, but I won't know what I am looking for until I have found it." Sequentiality represents another key difference. Vertical thinking is sequential—each step must connect logically to the previous one, and being correct at every stage is essential. Lateral thinking, however, can make jumps. It might reach a solution first and then work backward to justify it, or take steps that seem wrong but ultimately lead to the right solution. It's like building a bridge where the pieces don't have to be self-supporting at every stage, only when the final piece is in place. These differences extend to how each approach handles information. Vertical thinking concentrates on what is relevant, excluding everything else. Lateral thinking welcomes chance intrusions, particularly those that seem irrelevant, because these disruptions can alter established patterns. Vertical thinking treats categories and labels as fixed, while lateral thinking sees them as temporary conveniences that can be rearranged as needed. In practice, these approaches are complementary rather than antagonistic. Vertical thinking develops the ideas generated by lateral thinking. As Edward de Bono puts it, "You cannot dig a hole in a different place by digging the same hole deeper." Vertical thinking digs deeper; lateral thinking digs elsewhere.

Chapter 3: Challenging Assumptions and Generating Alternatives

At the heart of lateral thinking lies the deliberate challenge to assumptions and the active generation of alternatives. These practices help us escape from the prison of established thought patterns that can blind us to better solutions. Every situation we encounter is framed by assumptions—often unexamined ones—that limit our perspective and narrow our options. Assumptions function as invisible boundaries that define the problem space. When solving problems, we naturally set certain parameters to make the task manageable. However, these self-imposed limitations often become so ingrained that we forget they're optional. Like someone searching for an address only north of the Thames when it's actually south of the river, we may be looking in entirely the wrong area because of unquestioned assumptions. The practice of challenging assumptions doesn't mean rejecting them outright but rather becoming aware of them and testing their necessity. Consider the classic problem of connecting nine dots in a square arrangement using only four straight lines without lifting your pencil. The solution requires drawing lines that extend beyond the imaginary boundary of the square—an assumption many people make without realizing it. By questioning this unstated assumption, the seemingly impossible becomes solvable. Generating alternatives works hand-in-hand with challenging assumptions. This isn't merely about finding the best approach but about creating multiple ways of looking at a situation. Unlike the natural search for alternatives, which stops when a promising solution appears, lateral thinking continues generating options even after finding good ones. The purpose is to loosen rigid patterns and provoke new ones. A practical technique for generating alternatives is setting a quota—a fixed number of different ways to look at a situation. This ensures that we push beyond the obvious and explore unlikely pathways. Even if we ultimately return to the original approach, the exercise develops the habit of looking for alternatives and sometimes leads to unexpected insights. Consider the challenge of dividing a square into four equal pieces. Most people immediately think of dividing it into four smaller squares. But by continuing to generate alternatives, we might discover numerous other solutions—diagonal cuts, swastika patterns, or complex curves that divide the area equally. This exploration demonstrates the richness of possibilities that exist beyond our initial, obvious solution.

Chapter 4: Random Stimulation and Analogies

Random stimulation and analogies serve as powerful tools for provoking new thought patterns. They deliberately introduce external elements that disrupt established ways of thinking and catalyze new connections. Unlike vertical thinking, which deals only with what is relevant, lateral thinking purposefully embraces the seemingly irrelevant as a source of creative insight. Random stimulation works because the mind functions as a self-maximizing memory system with a limited attention span. When two apparently unconnected inputs are deliberately held in attention simultaneously, the mind naturally works to establish connections between them. This forced juxtaposition creates a new equilibrium state—sometimes with minor adjustments to the original pattern, but occasionally through complete restructuring. A practical application of random stimulation is the random word technique. By selecting a truly random word (using a dictionary or table of random numbers) and forcing connections between this word and the problem at hand, new perspectives emerge. For example, when addressing housing shortages, the random word "noose" might trigger ideas about tightening constraints, suspension construction systems, or adjustable-sized homes. The key is not to search for the "right" random stimulus but to use whatever appears and see what connections develop. Analogies function similarly but provide more structure through their inherent narratives and relationships. An analogy acts as a vehicle for transferring relationships and processes from a familiar context to the problem domain. For instance, using a snowball rolling downhill as an analogy for the spread of rumors highlights how both grow larger and pick up momentum as they progress. The analogy forces us to think about rumors in terms of the conditions required for growth and potential destructive power. The effectiveness of both techniques depends not on finding perfect matches but on their provocative quality. A seemingly inappropriate random word or imperfect analogy often proves more valuable precisely because it forces greater mental effort to establish connections. The objective isn't to prove anything through these techniques but to use them as stimulation to generate movement in thinking. Successful application requires confidence and the suspension of judgment. There should be no sense of urgency or frustration if connections don't immediately appear. With practice, users develop the quiet confidence that meaningful connections will emerge, even from the most unlikely stimulus. The aim is not to find the definitive solution through these techniques but to open pathways that might not have been visible through conventional thinking.

Chapter 5: Po: The Language Tool for Lateral Thinking

The word "po" represents a revolutionary language tool for lateral thinking, serving a function in creative thinking comparable to what "no" serves in logical thinking. While "no" is a judgment device that enables rejection, "po" is a provocation device that enables creative rearrangement of information. It embodies the concept of the "laxative"—loosening rigid patterns to allow information to come together in new ways. Po operates primarily in two fundamental ways. First, it creates new arrangements of information that wouldn't naturally occur. When you say "po water flows uphill if colored green," you're not making a factual claim but creating a provocative arrangement that might lead somewhere interesting. This arrangement might trigger thoughts about what could actually make water behave differently, perhaps leading to discoveries about special polymers that create unusual fluid behaviors. The second function of po is challenging established patterns. When you say "po freedom" or "po punishment," you're not attacking these concepts but inviting exploration of alternative ways to structure them. Po serves as an anti-arrogance device, reminding us that any particular arrangement of information, no matter how natural it seems, represents just one possible arrangement among many. Unlike the "no" function, which evaluates and judges, po never makes judgments. It doesn't argue that an arrangement is incorrect or unlikely; it simply suggests the possibility of other arrangements. When someone responds to a statement with "po," the appropriate response isn't defense or justification but cooperative exploration of alternatives. It's an invitation to a joint search rather than a challenge or criticism. Po can be used grammatically in various ways: as an interjection ("Po!"), as a preface to a statement ("Po clockwork with cogwheels made of rubber"), or as a juxtaposition connector ("Travel po ink"). It can appear anywhere "no" might appear but with the opposite function—not to reject but to open possibilities. When used skillfully, po can defuse tense situations, redirect blocked discussions, and stimulate creative thinking without destroying the valuable structure provided by vertical thinking. Perhaps most importantly, po provides a practical way to implement lateral thinking in everyday conversation. By signaling that information is being used provocatively rather than assertively, it creates a space for exploration free from the constraints of immediate judgment. As a language tool, po crystallizes the entire concept of lateral thinking into a simple, usable form that anyone can employ to break through conceptual barriers.

Chapter 6: Practical Applications in Problem Solving and Design

Lateral thinking finds its most practical expression in problem-solving, design, and creative description. These applications demonstrate how the theoretical framework of lateral thinking translates into tangible results across diverse fields. Each application represents a different way of implementing lateral thinking principles to overcome pattern rigidity and generate innovative solutions. In problem-solving, lateral thinking addresses three distinct types of problems. First are problems requiring more information or better techniques for handling information—these can be solved through vertical thinking. Second are problems requiring rearrangement of available information through insight restructuring—these demand lateral thinking. Third are "problems of no problem," where the current situation seems adequate but could be dramatically improved—these especially benefit from lateral thinking's ability to move beyond mere adequacy. Design provides a particularly fertile ground for lateral thinking practice. When students design something like an apple-picking machine, they reveal the power of cliché patterns in thinking. Initial designs often include unnecessary human features (like five-fingered hands on mechanical arms) borrowed from familiar contexts. Lateral thinking helps identify and challenge these cliché units through processes like trimming (removing nonessential elements), splitting (separating useful components from clichés), and abstraction (focusing on function rather than form). The design process also highlights the importance of function hierarchy. By moving from specific descriptions ("picking apples") to more general ones ("separating apples from trees"), designers can escape functional fixedness. This shift in perspective might transform the entire approach—perhaps leading to shaking trees instead of picking individual apples, or altering how trees are grown rather than adapting to their current form. Description provides the simplest entry point for practicing lateral thinking. By generating multiple descriptions of the same object or situation, we develop flexibility in perspective-taking. A geometric square, for instance, might be described as "a figure with four equal sides," "a rectangle with equal sides," or "two right-angled isosceles triangles placed base to base." Each description, while accurate, opens different avenues for thinking about the object. Across all these applications, the brainstorming session offers a formal setting that encourages lateral thinking through suspended judgment and cross-stimulation. By establishing clear rules against evaluation during the generative phase, participants feel free to offer ideas that might otherwise seem too outlandish. These sessions demonstrate that seemingly ridiculous suggestions often contain valuable functional kernels that can be developed into practical innovations. The practical value of lateral thinking ultimately lies in its ability to move beyond adequacy. Traditional thinking stops once a satisfactory solution is found, but lateral thinking continues exploring to find solutions that make better use of available information. This capacity to restructure patterns even when they seem adequate drives progress across all fields of human endeavor.

Summary

Lateral thinking provides a systematic approach to creativity that complements, rather than replaces, traditional vertical thinking. By understanding the mind as a pattern-making system with inherent limitations, we can apply specific techniques to escape rigid thought patterns and generate innovative solutions. The essence of lateral thinking lies in its different relationship with information—using it not for its own sake but for its effect in provoking new perceptual frameworks. The most powerful insight from lateral thinking is that creativity need not be left to chance. Through deliberate techniques like challenging assumptions, generating alternatives, using random stimulation, and employing the language tool "po," anyone can develop the ability to restructure patterns and see situations from fresh perspectives. In a world of accelerating change, where established ideas quickly become outdated, lateral thinking offers a practical method for continuous innovation and adaptation. It transforms creativity from a mysterious talent possessed by few into a systematic skill available to all.

About Author

Loading...

Edward de Bono

Edward de Bono was a Maltese physician, author, inventor, and consultant. He is best known as the originator of the term lateral thinking (structured creativity) and the leading proponent of the deliberate teaching of thinking in schools.

Read more