
Lead Yourself First
Inspiring Leadership Through Solitude
Categories
Business, Nonfiction, Self Help, Psychology, Philosophy, History, Leadership, Productivity, Management, Personal Development
Content Type
Book
Binding
Hardcover
Year
2017
Publisher
Bloomsbury USA
Language
English
ISBN13
9781632866318
File Download
PDF | EPUB
Lead Yourself First Plot Summary
Introduction
In today's hyper-connected world, leaders face a paradoxical challenge: they are more accessible than ever before but increasingly disconnected from their inner compass. The constant barrage of information, meetings, and digital communication has created a leadership environment where action is valued over reflection, and responsiveness over deep thinking. This cultural shift has quietly eroded one of leadership's most potent resources: solitude. Solitude - the state of being mentally isolated from input from other minds - serves as the foundation for effective leadership. It cultivates clarity in decision-making, fosters creativity through uninterrupted thought, provides emotional balance during crises, and builds the moral courage necessary to stand against convention when principles demand it. Through examining historical figures like Lincoln, Churchill, and King alongside contemporary leaders, we discover that the most impactful leadership moments often emerge not from constant collaboration but from deliberate periods of productive isolation. The capacity to withdraw, reflect, and emerge with conviction becomes not merely an optional skill but an essential practice for those who wish to lead with authenticity and purpose.
Chapter 1: The Power of Solitude in Developing Leadership Clarity
Leadership clarity requires the ability to distinguish signal from noise - to identify the critical variables amid complexity. When leaders engage in purposeful solitude, they create the mental space necessary to sort through information systematically, rather than responding reactively to whatever demands immediate attention. This analytical clarity emerges through a process of breaking down complexity to a single point of decision. Dwight Eisenhower exemplified this approach throughout World War II, particularly before D-Day. When faced with the monumental decision about when to launch the invasion, Eisenhower retreated to solitude to identify the key variable upon which success would hinge: the weather. Though surrounded by advisors and meteorologists, Eisenhower recognized that the final decision rested with him alone. Through solitary reflection, he distilled the complexity of the invasion into a simple rule: "We must go unless there is a real and very serious deterioration in the weather." This clarity gave him the framework to make one of history's most consequential decisions. For contemporary leaders, solitude serves a similar function. When Bill George, former CEO of Medtronic, faces complex challenges, he creates space for reflection through morning meditation. "A critical element of effective leadership," George notes, "is not to let the immediate take precedence over the important." This practice allows him to separate genuine priorities from mere urgency, clarifying his thinking when business pressures mount. The process of analytical clarity often involves writing during periods of solitude. General Stanley McChrystal found that helicopter rides during deployments provided the perfect environment for uninterrupted thinking. "No one can mess with you. Not getting emails. Just watching the brown terrain passing by below, hour after hour. I felt centered." This physical separation from distractions allowed him to process information and develop strategic clarity when it mattered most. For many leaders, solitude provides the opportunity to distinguish between symptoms and root causes. Sarah Dillard, an educational entrepreneur, regularly schedules time alone to review notes she's taken about workplace events. "I'm making connections between things in my notes. What things worked? What didn't? I'm learning about how the team is performing." This reflective practice helps her identify patterns that remain invisible amid day-to-day operations. The clarity derived from solitude extends beyond specific decisions to encompass broader purpose. Susan Cain, author and founder of Quiet Revolution, observes that introverted leaders in particular "usually don't want to be leaders just for the sake of being a leader. When introverts are leaders, it's usually because the work they're doing is really important to them." Solitude helps leaders connect their actions to deeper values, providing the clarity of purpose that sustains effective leadership.
Chapter 2: Finding Creativity Through Reflective Isolation
Creativity requires mental space that allows connections between seemingly unrelated ideas to emerge. While clarity helps leaders choose among existing options, creativity enables them to develop entirely new possibilities. This creative process often demands isolation from conventional thinking and the mental freedom to explore uncharted territory. Marie Curie's discovery of radiation illustrates how solitude facilitates scientific breakthroughs. Working alone in a small room with borrowed instruments, Curie focused intensely on uranium compounds, observing that they emitted energy without any apparent change to the compounds themselves. This violated the first law of thermodynamics as understood at that time. Her concentrated isolation allowed her to recognize that the energy came from within the uranium atom itself, a revolutionary insight that transformed our understanding of atomic structure. For contemporary leaders, reflective isolation similarly fuels creative breakthroughs. Joey Reiman, founder of BrightHouse consulting firm, intentionally creates what he calls "environments of unconditioned response" to generate innovative ideas. "Our work cycle for a project is four to sixteen weeks. It's a model of deep incubation. Solitude is absolutely essential to that process." Unlike standardized office environments that channel thinking along predictable paths, these spaces allow thoughts to find their own direction, leading to unexpected connections. T.E. Lawrence ("Lawrence of Arabia") demonstrated how solitude can spark strategic innovation during World War I. While incapacitated with dysentery in his tent for ten days in March 1917, Lawrence reconsidered conventional military doctrine. "Suppose we were (as we might be) an influence, an idea, a thing intangible, invulnerable, without front or back, drifting about like a gas?" This insight led him to develop the concept of insurgency—a radical departure from traditional warfare that proved remarkably effective against the Turkish forces. The creative benefits of solitude extend beyond professional leadership to personal domains. Dena Braeger, a mother of six children and West Point graduate, uses solitude to develop creative solutions to parenting challenges. "Often we try to correct behavior without going to the heart of it," she explains. "That takes time." When her daughter was mean to her sister, Braeger initially disciplined her but then took two days of reflection to craft a more thoughtful response addressing the underlying issue of taking offense too easily. Chip Edens, rector of Christ Church Charlotte, finds that solitude creates space for creative responses rather than reactive ones. "Viktor Frankl wrote about how between every stimulus and response, there is a space. Silence and solitude creates a sacred space, an elongated space. The space gives you time to develop a creative response to what you're feeling. Otherwise there is only reaction." This creative interval proves particularly valuable during organizational crises, allowing leaders to transcend conventional wisdom and develop innovative solutions that address root causes rather than symptoms.
Chapter 3: Solitude as a Path to Emotional Balance
Leadership inevitably brings emotional challenges that can destabilize even the most composed individuals. When adversity strikes, a leader's judgment can become clouded by fear, anger, or despair. Solitude offers a sanctuary where leaders can restore their emotional equilibrium—not by denying these feelings but by acknowledging and processing them constructively. Abraham Lincoln demonstrated this practice following one of his most painful setbacks of the Civil War. In July 1863, shortly after Union victories at Gettysburg and Vicksburg, Lincoln suffered crushing disappointment when Confederate General Robert E. Lee escaped across the Potomac River with his army intact. Had Union forces captured Lee's army then, the war might have ended immediately. Instead, Lincoln faced the prospect of continued bloodshed. His initial reaction was devastation. To Treasury Secretary Salmon Chase, Lincoln exclaimed: "What does it mean? Great God! What does it mean?" Rather than remaining in this distressed state, Lincoln retreated to his bedroom where, as his son Robert later discovered, he wept with "head bowed upon his arms resting on the table." Lincoln also wrote a letter to General Meade expressing his deep disappointment, though he never sent it. These private acts of emotional release—this catharsis—allowed Lincoln to regain his perspective. Within five days, Lincoln had recovered his emotional balance sufficiently to compose lighthearted verse about how Lee had "skedaddled back" to Virginia. For military leaders, maintaining emotional control during combat represents an even greater challenge. General James Mattis observes, "An effective leader is the person who can maintain their balance and reflect, when a lot of people around them are reacting." During the Battle of the Wilderness in 1864, General Ulysses S. Grant demonstrated this capacity while facing tremendous pressure. As Confederate forces rolled up his flanks and officers reported disaster, Grant maintained outward calm, whittling a stick while continuing to issue clear orders. Only after securing his army's position did Grant retreat to his tent where, in private, he "gave way to the greatest emotion," releasing the tension he had contained during the crisis. Contemporary leaders face different battlefields but similar emotional challenges. Jaya Vadlamudi, working for an international relief organization in post-Gaddafi Libya, encountered daily stresses from armed checkpoints, gender restrictions, and witnessing human suffering. "When I returned each night to a guesthouse alone," she recalls, "that was my chance to breathe. It was a physical and emotional release, to take off the backpack and the headscarf. Then I could just be me." By journaling about her experiences, Vadlamudi processed overwhelming emotions and regained the perspective necessary to continue her mission. The restoration of emotional balance often requires gaining broader perspective. Pam Slim, author and executive coach, found this perspective during a family financial crisis in 2007. Following her father-in-law's advice to "sit on the earth" when troubled, Slim established a morning ritual of sitting on a rock behind her house and watching the sunrise over the Superstition Mountains. "Looking at the mountains, I thought about how they'd been there a long time. Through all kinds of human experience, they were always there. I started to gain a clarity about what we were up against. It wasn't quite as big as I thought it was." This perspective allowed her to move from fear to focused action.
Chapter 4: Building Moral Courage Through Introspection
Moral courage—the willingness to take principled action despite personal consequences—forms the backbone of authentic leadership. When leaders face criticism, isolation, or material loss for upholding their values, solitude serves as the forge where conviction is strengthened and resolve is tempered. Through introspection, leaders connect their immediate challenges to deeper principles that transcend temporary difficulties. Winston Churchill exemplified this connection between solitude and moral courage in October 1938, when he stood before the House of Commons and declared that the Munich Agreement represented "a total and unmitigated defeat" for Britain. While most of the country celebrated Prime Minister Neville Chamberlain's appeasement of Hitler as ensuring "peace for our time," Churchill saw clearly the disaster that lay ahead. His speech proved politically damaging, earning him taunts during delivery and threatening his constituency support afterward. Churchill's courage emerged directly from his solitary writing practice. Night after night in his study at Chartwell, Churchill immersed himself in English history, developing a perspective that transcended immediate circumstances. Through this solitude, he connected current events to historical patterns and timeless principles. As his biographer William Manchester observed, "The quintessential Churchill, the Winston the public never saw, prowled his study night after night, an inner shutter drawn in a private blackout of the mind, excluding everything but the topic before him." This intense concentration forged convictions strong enough to withstand public ridicule. Martin Luther King Jr. similarly found moral courage through solitude during a moment of crisis. In January 1956, while leading the Montgomery bus boycott, King received a threatening phone call at midnight: "We are tired of you and your mess now. And if you aren't out of this town in three days, we're going to blow your brains out, and blow up your house." Shaken, King sat alone at his kitchen table contemplating surrender. In that solitary moment, King experienced a profound spiritual revelation: "I discovered then that religion had become real to me, and I had to know God for myself." He described hearing an inner voice saying, "Martin Luther, stand up for righteousness. Stand up for justice. Stand up for truth. And lo I will be with you, even until the end of the world." This solitary communion gave King the courage to continue despite escalating threats. Contemporary leaders find similar strength through reflection on their core principles. Doug Conant, former CEO of Campbell Soup Company, practices daily morning reflection focused on five areas: family, work, community, faith, and personal well-being. "Every morning, for thirty minutes, I sit in the garden or in a comfortable chair with a cup of coffee, reflecting," he explains. "Introspection helps ensure that my decisions are aligned with my principles. It's life-changing." Conant emphasizes that this practice must precede crisis: "As a leader, you need to have a rudder in the water for the storms of life." For Brené Brown, author and research professor, the courage to insist on necessary solitude represents a leadership challenge itself. "The decision to engage in solitude is a vulnerable and courageous act. There's a perception that making time for solitude is a sign of self-indulgence or weakness." When managing a demanding project with a small team working seven days a week, Brown made the difficult decision to take a day for herself. "I said, 'I'm not coming in tomorrow morning. I need to be alone.'" This choice, though initially questioned, ultimately benefited the entire team by restoring perspective and humanity to their process. Jimmy Bartz, founder of an unconventional Episcopal church in Los Angeles, connects solitude directly to courage: "I've really thought about what it is about solitude that makes it so important for me as a leader. It's about courage. I get the courage piece from solitude." Through regular practices of solitude and wilderness adventures, Bartz has developed the confidence to pursue an innovative approach to ministry despite institutional resistance.
Chapter 5: Modern Leadership's Disconnection from Solitude
Today's leadership culture increasingly celebrates constant connectivity, immediate responsiveness, and perpetual activity. This shift has created an environment hostile to the very solitude that many great leaders have relied upon historically. The consequences of this disconnection manifest in reactive decision-making, superficial thinking, and leadership burnout across organizations. The technological revolution has fundamentally altered how leaders engage with information and others. Where leaders once had natural moments of isolation during travel, waiting periods, or simply being physically alone, today's smartphones ensure constant connection to emails, messages, and notifications. General Stanley McChrystal observes, "Technology has brought changes to leadership. The barrier to entry to contact leaders is so low now, with email. I don't want to be rude to people. And responding to emails can make you feel like you're getting a lot done. But when you're doing that you're not taking time to think." This constant accessibility prevents the mental isolation necessary for deep thought. Nate Fick, former Marine Recon officer and CEO of Endgame Inc., notes how leaders must now deliberately structure solitude into their schedules: "I tell my assistant I need ninety minutes a day on my calendar to close the door and think. Otherwise the days get so hectic that you have no time to process or to think." Fick extends this practice to his entire organization: "I tell my subordinates that two days each month, no one has any meetings." Beyond technology, cultural norms increasingly equate leadership presence with physical availability. Joey Reiman describes how conventional work environments actively discourage productive solitude: "A cubicle puts you inside a literal box. You're thinking within the rules there. Codification, routinization, stratification, all of those things are the enemies of unconditioned response." These standardized environments channel thinking along predictable paths, limiting creative possibilities. The consequences of disconnection from solitude are profound. General James Mattis states bluntly: "If I was to sum up the single biggest problem of senior leadership in the information age, it's a lack of reflection." Without reflection, leaders become reactive rather than proactive, responding to whatever demands immediate attention rather than focusing on what matters most. Bill George observes, "Today's world puts too much emphasis on the immediate. That's a perpetual danger for leaders." This disconnection affects not only decision quality but also leadership sustainability. Brené Brown explains that new leaders often believe they must earn the right to solitude: "When you ask them, 'What kind of alone time do you need to think through problems?' they'll say, 'I haven't earned that yet.'" This misconception treats solitude as a reward rather than a necessity. Brown counters: "Solitude is not the reward for great leadership. It's the path to great leadership." Perhaps most concerning is how the absence of solitude threatens moral courage. Pope John Paul II, whose solitary reflections helped undermine communist rule in Poland, warned: "The real danger to both sides... is the man who does not listen to his deepest convictions, to his inner truth, but who wants only to fit, to float in conformity." Without the space to connect with deeper principles, leaders become susceptible to groupthink and expedient compromise.
Chapter 6: Practical Ways to Incorporate Solitude into Leadership
Recognizing solitude's value is one thing; creating space for it amid today's demands requires deliberate strategies and cultural change. Fortunately, effective practices for incorporating solitude into leadership routines can be adapted to diverse personalities, positions, and environments. The key lies not in duration but in quality—creating conditions where genuine reflection can occur. The first step involves resetting expectations about accessibility. A leader must establish clear boundaries around their time and attention. Nate Fick suggests designating certain days as "no-meeting days" and blocking specific periods on the calendar for reflection. Wendy Kopp at Teach for America implemented a policy prohibiting work-related emails on weekends. Such policies signal that reflection is not merely permitted but essential to the organization's success. For environments without private offices, leaders must find alternative spaces. Sarah Dillard recommends using empty conference rooms, libraries, or outdoor settings during lunch breaks. "I make a point to spend time alone," she explains. "It's when I can think without interruption about what we're trying to accomplish." The physical separation from workplace stimuli creates mental space for deeper consideration of priorities and strategies. Many leaders find that movement facilitates reflection. Peter Crawford incorporates early morning runs into his routine: "The first hour of the day is the best for thinking. In the morning light my mind is fresh and clear. It's like stripping away all the cookies on a computer." Liza Howard, an ultramarathoner, describes running as "a distilling process. The detritus of daily living drops down, and I'm left with what's important." These physical activities occupy enough attention to prevent mind-wandering while leaving mental capacity for focused reflection. Writing proves exceptionally valuable for structured thinking. Peter Crawford writes memos to himself: "I usually don't send them to anyone. I'm just collecting my thoughts in a structured way." This practice forces logical organization and surfaces assumptions that might otherwise remain hidden. Chip Edens maintains a daily journaling practice: "I have a stream of consciousness in my mind, thought streams. The first thing I do is write down my thought streams. I name what I'm feeling. Then I engage it." This process allows him to move from emotion to analysis to values-based response. For extroverts, who gain energy from interaction, solitude requires different approaches. Bill George, a self-described "very active, extroverted person," practices transcendental meditation. "I don't know how TM works, but it does. TM allows you to slow down, to reflect." George explains that the benefits justify the initial discomfort: "Things seem to be clear when I'm done. Then I grab a piece of paper and start writing down ideas." Doug Conant, another extrovert, schedules regular reflection periods: "Every three or four months, I do what I call a 'deeper dive.' It's usually when I'm traveling, on a plane or train coming home." Preparing for solitude improves its productivity. Identifying specific issues to consider beforehand allows subconscious processing to begin. As Nate Fick notes, "I often start a run thinking, 'Here's what I need to figure out.' So I start thinking about that, and then after two minutes I'm off onto something else. But almost inevitably, by the time I'm done running, I'll have circled back and finished my thinking about that issue." Finally, leaders must recognize that solitude serves different purposes at different times. For analytical problems, structured approaches like memo-writing may prove most effective. For emotional balance, cathartic practices like journaling or meditation might better serve. For moral courage, connecting with one's deepest values through quiet reflection often provides the necessary strength. The common element is creating space where the mind can work through issues without external distraction or pressure for immediate results.
Chapter 7: Historical Leaders Who Leveraged Solitude for Success
Throughout history, transformative leaders have relied on solitude to navigate their greatest challenges. Their experiences reveal not just the personal benefits of solitude but its broader impact on organizations, movements, and nations. By examining how these figures incorporated solitude into their leadership practice, we gain insights applicable to contemporary challenges. Abraham Lincoln's solitary reflection proved crucial during the Civil War's darkest moments. In July 1863, after Confederate General Robert E. Lee escaped across the Potomac River with his army intact, Lincoln initially expressed profound distress. Rather than remaining in this state, however, Lincoln retreated to his bedroom where he wept privately. He also wrote a letter to General Meade expressing his deep disappointment—a letter he never sent but kept for himself. These private acts of emotional release allowed Lincoln to regain his perspective and continue leading effectively. His Secretary John Hay noted just five days later that Lincoln was "in very good humour." Winston Churchill's nightly solitude in his study at Chartwell produced not only his published works but the moral courage that defined his leadership. During the 1930s, when most British politicians advocated appeasement, Churchill developed contrary convictions through intense historical study. His biographer described how "the quintessential Churchill, the Winston the public never saw, prowled his study night after night, an inner shutter drawn in a private blackout of the mind, excluding everything but the topic before him." This concentration forged the conviction that enabled Churchill to stand virtually alone against appeasement and later to rally Britain during its darkest hour. Jane Goodall's groundbreaking work with chimpanzees demonstrates how solitude enhances observation and intuition. After initial frustration trying to observe chimps using conventional approaches, Goodall tried something different: she climbed alone to a mountain peak and simply sat in plain view. "Within fifteen minutes, I saw three chimpanzees on the bare slope directly below me, only eighty yards away." By positioning herself alone and remaining still, she achieved what teams of researchers had failed to accomplish. Goodall later wrote that "the first step on the road to experiencing true awareness is the cessation of noise from within." Dwight Eisenhower regularly wrote memoranda to himself during World War II to clarify his thinking on critical decisions. Before D-Day, Eisenhower faced conflicting advice about whether to proceed with the invasion given uncertain weather forecasts. Through solitary reflection, he distilled the complexity to a simple rule: "We must go unless there is a real and very serious deterioration in the weather." When the fateful moment arrived on June 5, 1944, Eisenhower sat in silence for five minutes before giving the order that would change history: "Okay, let's go." Martin Luther King Jr.'s kitchen table revelation in January 1956 illustrates solitude's spiritual dimension. Receiving a midnight death threat during the Montgomery bus boycott, King contemplated abandoning the movement. Sitting alone at his kitchen table, he experienced what he later described as hearing "the voice of Jesus saying still to fight on. He promised never to leave me, never to leave me alone." This solitary communion gave King the courage to continue despite escalating threats. The following day, when his house was bombed, King remained calm, telling the angry crowd, "We are not advocating violence. We want to love our enemies." Pope John Paul II developed his critique of communist rule through regular solitary reflection. As Archbishop of Krakow, Karol Wojtyla closed his chapel door daily for two hours of uninterrupted thinking and writing. From this solitude emerged philosophical works that identified communism's fundamental flaw: its denial of human dignity and free will. When he returned to Poland as pope in 1979, his message—delivered to millions—reflected decades of solitary reflection: "Christ cannot be kept out of the history of man in any part of the globe, at any longitude or latitude of geography." This message, grounded in deep conviction, helped catalyze the movement that eventually toppled communist rule. T.E. Lawrence's development of insurgency warfare during World War I emerged from forced solitude. Incapacitated with dysentery for ten days in 1917, Lawrence reconsidered conventional military doctrine. His insight—"Suppose we were an influence, an idea, a thing intangible, invulnerable, without front or back, drifting about like a gas?"—revolutionized the Arab Revolt's strategy. Instead of directly confronting superior Turkish forces, Lawrence advocated hit-and-run tactics that targeted supply lines rather than armies. This approach, conceived in solitude, changed the course of the campaign and influenced military thinking for generations.
Summary
Effective leadership fundamentally depends on the capacity for productive solitude. Through examining historical and contemporary leaders across diverse fields, a consistent pattern emerges: those who lead most effectively first learn to lead themselves through deliberate periods of reflection. This practice yields four essential leadership qualities—clarity in decision-making, creativity in problem-solving, emotional balance during crises, and moral courage when facing opposition. Without solitude, leaders become reactive rather than proactive, conventional rather than innovative, emotionally volatile rather than stable, and expedient rather than principled. The contemporary leadership environment—with its emphasis on constant connectivity, immediate responsiveness, and collaborative processes—actively works against the very solitude that enables effective leadership. This represents not merely a personal challenge for individual leaders but a systemic threat to organizational effectiveness. The solution begins with recognizing solitude not as self-indulgence but as essential discipline. By establishing boundaries around accessibility, creating physical and temporal spaces for reflection, and developing practices suited to individual temperaments, leaders can restore this vital dimension of leadership. Those who master this discipline gain a profound competitive advantage: the ability to transcend immediate pressures and connect with deeper insights, creativity, emotional resilience, and moral conviction that form the foundation of transformative leadership.
Best Quote
“Time is an unrenewable resource. You can’t get it back. All these things we’ve done to exchange information, to access information at our fingertips, have actually taken away our time for restoring the soul. You’re giving away your soul’s ability to be moved. If we’d spend more time in solitude, we’d value ourselves more.” ― Raymond M. Kethledge, Lead Yourself First: Inspiring Leadership Through Solitude
Review Summary
Strengths: The review highlights the book's important message on the necessity of solitude for effective leadership, emphasizing its role in fostering analytical thinking, intuition, creativity, and moral courage. It also appreciates the practical insights from Doug Contant on personal leadership and the "inside-out" process of leadership.\nOverall Sentiment: Enthusiastic\nKey Takeaway: The review underscores the critical importance of solitude in leadership, especially in an "always-on" culture, and values the practical leadership insights provided by Doug Contant, which emphasize the need for personal reflection and internal fortification to lead effectively.
Trending Books
Download PDF & EPUB
To save this Black List summary for later, download the free PDF and EPUB. You can print it out, or read offline at your convenience.

Lead Yourself First
By Jim Collins