Lean In

Lean In Plot Summary

Introduction

Despite significant progress in many areas of society, women continue to be underrepresented in leadership positions across business, politics, academia, and other sectors. This persistent gap exists not because women lack ambition or capabilities, but because they face unique challenges that their male counterparts typically do not encounter. These barriers are both external (institutional obstacles, gender bias, discrimination) and internal (self-doubt, fear of negative perception, reluctance to advocate for oneself). The journey toward leadership for women requires navigating a complex terrain where success and likeability are often perceived as mutually exclusive, where perfectionism can become paralyzing, and where choices about career and family are scrutinized in ways men's choices rarely are. By examining these challenges through rigorous analysis of research data, personal experiences, and observed patterns, we gain valuable insights into how women can overcome these obstacles. The strategies explored offer pathways not only for individual women to advance but for creating systemic change that benefits organizations and society as a whole. Understanding these dynamics helps both women and men work together toward environments where leadership potential can be fully realized regardless of gender.

Chapter 1: The Leadership Ambition Gap: Understanding the Problem

The leadership ambition gap represents a fundamental disparity in how men and women position themselves for advancement opportunities. Research consistently shows that men are more likely than women to pursue leadership roles, raise their hands for challenging assignments, and express confidence in their abilities to take on greater responsibilities. This gap is not innate but develops through socialization that begins in childhood and continues throughout women's lives. From early ages, girls receive subtle and explicit messages about appropriate behavior that can diminish leadership tendencies. While boys are often encouraged to be assertive, take risks, and speak up, girls are frequently rewarded for being accommodating, careful, and supportive. These messages create a foundation where leadership ambitions may be seen as less desirable or natural for women. The data reveals this disparity clearly: surveys of business professionals show that 36 percent of men aim for C-suite positions compared to only 18 percent of women. Family expectations and planning also affect leadership aspirations differently across genders. Young women often begin mentally accommodating hypothetical family responsibilities years before they actually face them, sometimes making career decisions based on future scenarios that may never materialize. This "leaving before you leave" phenomenon results in women pulling back from opportunities prematurely, creating a self-fulfilling prophecy where they become less competitive candidates when leadership positions do arise. Societal expectations about what constitutes appropriate female behavior further complicate matters. Successful women frequently encounter backlash for displaying the very traits celebrated in male leaders - assertiveness, decisiveness, and strong opinions. When women demonstrate these qualities, they risk being labeled as "bossy," "aggressive," or "difficult." This double bind creates psychological barriers where women must choose between being liked and being respected, a choice men rarely face. Addressing the leadership ambition gap requires acknowledging these complex factors rather than attributing the disparity simply to women's choices or preferences. It means recognizing that women face what amounts to a psychological obstacle course on the path to leadership - one that includes both external barriers erected by society and internal barriers that women themselves may construct in response to cultural messages. Understanding this reality is the first step toward meaningful change.

Chapter 2: Success and Likeability: The Double Bind Women Face

The relationship between success and likeability creates one of the most challenging paradoxes for women in leadership. Research has repeatedly demonstrated that as men become more successful and powerful, they are generally more liked by colleagues of both genders. For women, however, the opposite often occurs. As women achieve greater success, they frequently become less liked. This inverse correlation creates a significant barrier to advancement. The landmark "Heidi/Howard" study illustrates this phenomenon vividly. When researchers presented business school students with identical case studies about a successful venture capitalist - giving half the students a version with the name "Heidi" and half with "Howard" - the results were revealing. While both were rated equally competent, Howard was perceived as likeable and someone students would want to work with, while Heidi was seen as selfish and not someone they would hire or work for. Same accomplishments, same actions, drastically different perceptions. This double bind forces women to constantly navigate between appearing competent and appearing warm. Women often find themselves making strategic choices about how to present their achievements, knowing that straightforward self-promotion carries social penalties that don't apply to men. The need to simultaneously demonstrate competence while assuring others they're "nice enough" creates a cognitive and emotional burden men rarely experience. This challenge becomes particularly acute in negotiations, where women who advocate for themselves face backlash, while those who don't advocate sufficiently limit their advancement. The consequences extend beyond personal discomfort. When women anticipate this negative reaction, they may dial back their ambitions, avoid certain opportunities, or modify their behavior in ways that ultimately undermine their effectiveness. Some women respond by trying to make themselves less threatening through self-deprecation or by minimizing their accomplishments. Others adopt what researchers call "gender judo" - carefully balancing assertiveness with warmth through strategic communication techniques that acknowledge communal values. Communications patterns reveal this dynamic clearly. Women are more likely to use hedging language, apologize unnecessarily, and frame direct requests as questions. These linguistic accommodations represent adaptations to a world where women's assertiveness is often penalized. What appears as hesitation or lack of confidence is frequently a rational response to real social consequences for violating gender expectations. Breaking free from this double bind requires both individual strategies and systemic change. For individual women, finding ways to combine warmth with competence - what some experts call being "relentlessly pleasant" - can mitigate backlash. Yet the ultimate solution lies in changing the underlying expectations themselves, so that leadership qualities are evaluated consistently regardless of gender.

Chapter 3: Addressing Internal Barriers: Self-Doubt and Confidence

The confidence gap between men and women emerges as a significant internal barrier to leadership advancement. Research consistently shows that women underestimate their abilities and performance, while men tend to overestimate theirs. This disparity appears across fields and age groups, with profound implications for career progression. When opportunities arise, women often hesitate, questioning whether they have sufficient qualifications, while men with comparable or even lesser qualifications put themselves forward without similar doubts. This pattern manifests in various professional contexts. In academic settings, female students achieve higher grades yet rate their abilities lower than male peers. In workplaces, women apply for promotions only when they meet nearly 100% of the stated qualifications, while men apply when meeting just 60%. This reluctance to put oneself forward unless perfectly qualified creates a significant advancement gap over time. The consequences compound as careers progress, with each missed opportunity representing not just an immediate setback but lost experience that could qualify women for future leadership roles. The impostor syndrome - the persistent feeling that one's achievements are undeserved and that eventual exposure as a "fraud" is inevitable - affects high-achieving women with particular intensity. Even women with exceptional credentials and accomplishments often attribute their success to luck, timing, or help from others rather than their own capabilities. This internalized doubt creates a cognitive tax on women's mental resources, requiring constant management of anxiety that could otherwise be directed toward creative thinking and leadership activities. Perfectionism frequently accompanies these confidence issues, creating additional barriers. The need to be flawless before taking action leads many women to overthink decisions, avoid risks, and limit their participation in situations where they might make mistakes. This perfectionism is particularly damaging because leadership development necessarily involves learning through trial and error. By avoiding situations where failure is possible, women miss critical growth opportunities that build the resilience and experience needed for higher leadership positions. Cultural messages received throughout life reinforce these tendencies. Girls learn early that they are judged on both competence and likeability, creating pressure to be both exceptional and modest. The emphasis on avoiding mistakes and maintaining harmonious relationships can discourage the bold moves that leadership often requires. Even highly successful women report spending significant mental energy managing the perception that they might be "too ambitious" or "too assertive." Addressing these internal barriers requires conscious effort to recognize and counteract self-limiting beliefs. Strategies like "fake it till you make it," deliberately taking calculated risks, and reframing failure as learning can help women overcome the confidence gap. Perhaps most importantly, recognizing that confidence is not just an internal feeling but a skill that can be developed through practice allows women to approach leadership opportunities with greater assurance.

Chapter 4: Navigating Organizational Structures and Cultural Expectations

Organizational structures and practices, while often presented as gender-neutral, frequently contain hidden biases that disadvantage women seeking leadership roles. The traditional corporate ladder, with its emphasis on linear progression and continuous full-time presence, was designed around historically male career patterns that assumed minimal family responsibilities. This structure creates particular challenges for women who may need or want more flexibility at various career stages. Performance evaluation systems typically reward visibility, self-promotion, and traditionally masculine leadership styles. Research shows that the same behaviors receive different ratings depending on the gender of the person being evaluated. Assertiveness may be labeled "leadership material" in men but "abrasive" in women. Similarly, relationship-building activities that women often excel at are frequently undervalued compared to more visible achievements. These subjective interpretations create cumulative disadvantages as women progress through their careers. Networking and mentorship dynamics present additional challenges. Leadership positions are often filled through informal networks where decisions happen through conversations outside formal processes. When these networks are predominantly male, women have less access to the relationship capital that facilitates advancement. The scarcity of senior women creates a mentorship gap, with fewer experienced female leaders available to guide younger women. This scarcity also leads to the phenomenon where the few women who do reach senior levels are overwhelmingly scrutinized as representatives of their entire gender. Cultural expectations around work hours and constant availability disproportionately impact women, who still shoulder greater family responsibilities on average. The "ideal worker" norm that values unlimited time commitment creates structural barriers for anyone with significant caregiving duties. When organizations equate presence with productivity and commitment with constant availability, women face impossible choices between meeting these expectations and fulfilling family responsibilities. The "prove-it-again" bias requires women to repeatedly demonstrate competence that is assumed in their male counterparts. Studies show that women's mistakes are remembered longer and their successes attributed more to external factors than to skill. This creates a higher performance threshold where women must be exceptionally good to be considered merely competent. Over time, this constant need to re-establish credentials creates both practical barriers to advancement and psychological exhaustion. Navigating these structures successfully requires understanding their hidden dynamics and developing strategies to address them. This might include seeking sponsors (not just mentors) who will actively advocate for opportunities, making accomplishments visible in ways that align with organizational values, and identifying workplaces with more progressive practices. It also involves recognizing when structures themselves need changing and working collectively to transform organizations rather than just adapting to biased systems.

Chapter 5: Balancing Career and Family: Moving Beyond False Choices

The perceived incompatibility between professional success and family fulfillment represents one of the most persistent barriers to women's leadership advancement. This dichotomy is often presented as an inevitable either/or choice, particularly for women. However, examining the evidence reveals that this framing is based more on cultural assumptions than on objective reality. Research consistently shows that children of working mothers develop just as well as those with stay-at-home parents, with some studies indicating positive effects from having working role models. The timing of family formation often coincides with critical career-building years, creating particular challenges for women in their twenties and thirties. This biological reality intersects with workplace expectations for constant availability and geographical mobility during precisely the years when professionals build the foundations for leadership roles. Without structural accommodations for these life patterns, organizations lose valuable talent as women make pragmatic choices within constrained options. The problem isn't that women aren't ambitious enough, but that systems aren't flexible enough to accommodate different life patterns. Societal expectations compound these challenges by holding mothers and fathers to different standards. While working fathers are generally praised for any level of family involvement, working mothers face scrutiny and judgment whether they work full-time, part-time, or stay home. The psychological burden of constantly justifying one's choices creates an additional tax on women's mental resources that men rarely experience. This "maternal wall" bias can be even stronger than general gender bias, with studies showing that mothers are perceived as less competent and committed than non-mothers with identical qualifications. The corporate culture of presenteeism - valuing face time over actual productivity - creates particular challenges for professionals with family responsibilities. Organizations that measure commitment by hours visibly spent in the office disadvantage those who need predictable schedules or who work efficiently to accommodate family needs. This culture persists despite evidence that results-oriented work environments actually increase productivity and innovation while reducing turnover. Moving beyond false choices requires reframing the conversation from individual women's choices to societal and organizational responsibilities. Countries with policies supporting both parents' involvement in childcare - through parental leave, affordable childcare, and flexible work arrangements - show higher rates of female leadership and greater overall economic productivity. These policies benefit not just women but all employees seeking meaningful integration of work and personal responsibilities. At the individual level, challenging the perfectionist standards that create unnecessary guilt proves essential. Recognizing that no parent, regardless of work status, can be perfectly present for every moment helps reduce self-imposed pressure. Similarly, questioning the assumption that career advancement must follow a continuous, uninterrupted trajectory allows for more creative approaches to professional development that accommodate different life phases.

Chapter 6: Creating a Support System: Mentors, Partners, and Allies

Building an effective support system emerges as a critical factor in women's leadership advancement. Research consistently shows that women who succeed in reaching senior leadership positions rarely do so in isolation - they benefit from strategic relationships that provide guidance, opportunity, and practical support. Understanding how to develop and leverage these relationships becomes a crucial skill for aspiring female leaders. Mentorship represents a valuable component of professional development, but the dynamics differ significantly for women. Traditional mentoring relationships often operate through informal channels, with senior leaders naturally gravitating toward junior colleagues who remind them of themselves. Since leadership remains predominantly male, women face structural disadvantages in forming these organic connections. Effective mentorship for women typically requires more intentional approaches, including formal mentoring programs that overcome unconscious biases in relationship formation. While mentors provide advice and guidance, sponsors play an even more crucial role in advancement. Sponsors are senior leaders with sufficient influence to advocate for opportunities, recommend promotions, and create visibility for their protégés. Research shows that women are less likely than men to have powerful sponsors, yet the presence of a sponsor correlates strongly with career advancement. Organizations that implement formal sponsorship programs for high-potential women see measurable improvements in gender diversity at leadership levels. The role of domestic partners emerges as perhaps the most significant factor in women's ability to pursue leadership opportunities. Studies consistently show that the vast majority of female executives have partners who take active roles in family responsibilities and support their career ambitions. When domestic labor and childcare fall disproportionately on women, even the most talented professionals face practical limitations on their ability to pursue leadership paths. Creating more equitable domestic partnerships benefits not just women but also organizations seeking to retain valuable talent. Male allies in the workplace play an essential role in creating environments where women can advance. When men in positions of power actively advocate for gender equality - by ensuring women's voices are heard in meetings, recommending them for key assignments, and challenging biased practices - they help dismantle structural barriers. This allyship becomes particularly powerful when men use their credibility to address issues that women might be penalized for raising themselves. Female peers constitute another crucial support element, though competitive dynamics can sometimes undermine solidarity. Women who form strategic alliances with female colleagues - amplifying each other's ideas, providing feedback, and sharing information about opportunities - create powerful networks that benefit all participants. This peer support helps counter the isolation that often accompanies being one of few women in leadership settings. Building an effective support system requires strategic thinking about relationship development. For women, this means identifying potential mentors and sponsors based on their influence and alignment with one's goals, creating mutual value in these relationships, and being explicit about one's aspirations. It also means selecting personal partners partly based on their willingness to support leadership ambitions, and cultivating allies who can advocate in settings where one's voice might be discounted.

Chapter 7: Changing Institutional Structures for Gender Equality

Transforming institutions to support gender equality requires moving beyond individual strategies to address systemic barriers embedded in organizational structures. While personal adaptation can help individual women navigate existing systems, lasting change depends on redesigning the institutions themselves. This transformation must address both formal policies and the invisible cultural norms that often prove more resistant to change. Recruitment and advancement processes frequently contain hidden biases that disadvantage women. Studies consistently show that identical resumes with female names receive lower ratings than those with male names, and that job descriptions using masculine-coded language discourage female applicants. Organizations that implement structured evaluation criteria, diverse hiring committees, and requirements for diverse candidate slates see measurable improvements in gender balance. Similarly, when promotion processes rely on clear performance metrics rather than subjective assessments, gender disparities decrease significantly. Flexibility policies represent another crucial institutional element, though their implementation determines their effectiveness. When flexibility options exist but carry career penalties for those who use them, they fail to address structural barriers. Organizations that normalize flexibility for all employees - including senior leaders and men - remove the stigma that often accompanies "family-friendly" policies. Results-oriented work environments that focus on outcomes rather than face time create conditions where both men and women can succeed while managing multiple life priorities. Pay transparency emerges as a powerful tool for institutional change. When compensation decisions happen behind closed doors, unconscious biases go unchallenged and negotiation disparities compound over time. Organizations that implement standardized compensation based on objective criteria, conduct regular equity audits, and create transparency around pay decisions show smaller gender gaps in compensation. These practices benefit not just women but all employees by creating more consistent and fair rewards systems. Leadership development programs require particular attention to gender dynamics. Traditional high-potential programs often overlook qualified women due to differences in self-promotion and visibility. When organizations actively track the gender balance of leadership pipelines, provide sponsorship for promising women, and create development opportunities that accommodate different career patterns, they expand their talent pool while addressing structural barriers. Cultural transformation represents perhaps the most challenging aspect of institutional change. Organizations must address the subtle norms that privilege masculine leadership styles, tolerate microaggressions, and create inhospitable environments for women, particularly women of color. This requires ongoing education about unconscious bias, clear accountability for inclusive behavior, and recognition of the business benefits of diverse leadership. Most critically, it requires visible commitment from senior leaders who model new norms and hold others accountable for change. The business case for these institutional changes continues to strengthen. Research consistently demonstrates that organizations with gender-diverse leadership teams outperform homogeneous competitors on measures including profitability, innovation, and retention of top talent. As global competition for skilled employees intensifies, institutions that create truly inclusive environments gain significant advantages in attracting and developing the best talent regardless of gender.

Summary

The path to gender equality in leadership requires a comprehensive approach that addresses both individual and systemic barriers. When examined holistically, the challenges women face reveal interconnected patterns that cannot be solved through isolated interventions or by placing the burden of change solely on women themselves. The most effective strategies combine personal agency with institutional transformation, creating environments where leadership talent can flourish regardless of gender. The evolution toward truly inclusive leadership environments benefits not just women but organizations and society as a whole. Research consistently demonstrates that diverse leadership teams make better decisions, achieve stronger financial results, and create more innovative solutions to complex problems. As traditional command-and-control leadership models give way to more collaborative approaches, the skills many women have developed - including emotional intelligence, relationship building, and inclusive decision-making - become increasingly valuable. The future of effective leadership will likely incorporate the full spectrum of human capabilities rather than privileging traditionally masculine attributes alone. This transformation creates opportunities for both men and women to lead authentically, bringing their unique strengths to addressing the complex challenges facing organizations and society.

About Author

Loading...

Sheryl Sandberg

SHERYL SANDBERG is chief operating officer at Facebook, overseeing the firm's business operations. Prior to Facebook, Sheryl was vice president of Global Online Sales and Operations at Google, chief of staff for the United States Treasury Department under President Clinton, a management consultant with McKinsey & Company, and an economist with the World Bank. Sheryl received a BA summa cum laude from Harvard University and an MBA with highest distinction from Harvard Business School. Sheryl is the co-author of Option B: Facing Adversity, Building Resilience, and Finding Joy with Wharton professor and bestselling author Adam Grant, which will be released April 24, 2017. She is also the author of the bestsellers Lean In: Women, Work, and the Will to Lead and Lean In for Graduates. She is the founder of the Sheryl Sandberg & Dave Goldberg Family Foundation, a nonprofit organization that works to build a more equal and resilient world through two key initiatives, LeanIn.Org and OptionB.Org (launching April 2017). Sheryl serves on the boards of Facebook, the Walt Disney Company, Women for Women International, ONE, and SurveyMonkey.

Read more