Making a Point

Making a Point Plot Summary

Introduction

Imagine reading a text with no spaces between words, no commas to pause, and no periods to stop. This was once the reality of written language. The earliest English texts, dating back to Anglo-Saxon times, appeared as continuous streams of letters with minimal guidance for readers. The evolution of punctuation marks represents one of the most fascinating yet overlooked aspects of language development. Punctuation began not as rules for writers but as aids for readers, particularly those reading aloud. In medieval monasteries, monks developed simple marks to help them navigate religious texts during public readings. The period (or "full stop" in British English) was among the first marks to appear, initially placed at different heights on the line to indicate pauses of different lengths. By the 9th century, basic systems of dots had evolved into more complex arrangements, with the punctus elevatus (raised point) indicating a medium pause and the punctus interrogativus showing questions.

Chapter 1: The Ancient Origins: How Punctuation Was Born

The story of English punctuation begins with a remarkable absence. If you examine the earliest English inscriptions from the 9th century, you'll notice something striking: there is no punctuation at all. These ancient texts appear as continuous streams of letters with no spaces between words, no commas to pause, and no periods to end sentences. This writing style, known as scriptura continua, was common in early Western writing and presents a puzzle to modern readers accustomed to clearly marked text. Why did early writers forgo punctuation? The answer lies in how texts were used. Ancient writing served primarily as a guide for reading aloud rather than silent reading. When we speak naturally, we don't insert artificial pauses between each word, and fluent readers of that era didn't need such visual cues. The text functioned more like a musical score, reminding the reader what to say next in public performances and displays of oratory. This lack of punctuation created significant challenges, however. Without word divisions or punctuation marks, readers needed to carefully prepare texts before public readings to avoid embarrassing misinterpretations. The potential for confusion was substantial - imagine trying to decipher "therapistsneedspecialtreatment" without any guidance on where word boundaries fall. By the seventh century in England, word-spacing had become standard practice, reflecting a radical change in reading habits as silent reading gradually became more common. The earliest punctuation marks were remarkably simple - just dots placed at different heights on the line to indicate pauses of different lengths. A dot at the bottom of the line (punctus versus) marked the end of a statement. A dot in the middle (punctus medius) indicated a medium pause. A dot at the top (punctus elevatus) signaled a short pause. This system, while basic, represented a revolutionary development in written communication, allowing writers to guide readers through increasingly complex texts with greater precision. The question mark emerged during the Middle Ages as a specialized mark called the punctus interrogativus, signaling that a sentence was a question. Initially appearing as the Latin word "questio" written above sentences, it was later abbreviated to "qo" and eventually stylized into the curved symbol we recognize today. The exclamation mark followed in the 14th century, providing writers with a way to indicate emphasis or emotional intensity that had previously been impossible to convey in writing.

Chapter 2: The Breathing Theory: When Marks Guided Speech

When you read aloud, where do you pause to take a breath? This seemingly simple question was central to the development of punctuation for over a thousand years. Early punctuation systems were primarily designed to help readers know when to pause while reading texts aloud, especially in religious contexts where monks needed guidance on how to read sacred texts during services without embarrassing mistakes. The influential 8th-century scholar Alcuin emphasized that scribes needed to include "relevant marks of punctuation in their proper order, so that the lector may neither read mistakenly, nor by chance suddenly fall silent before the holy brothers in church." These marks, known as positurae or "positions," indicated pauses of different lengths. The system was remarkably precise - the punctus versus marked the end of a statement with a relatively long pause, while the punctus elevatus indicated where the first part of a sentence was complete but the sentence itself had not ended. This breathing-based approach dominated punctuation theory well into the Renaissance. Richard Mulcaster, a 16th-century headteacher, described the comma as "a small croked point, which in writing followeth som small branch of the sentence, & in reading warneth vs to rest there, and to help our breth a litle." Similarly, he explained that the colon indicated a place to pause longer, and the period marked where to "help our breth at full." The underlying principle was that punctuation should mirror the natural rhythms of speech and breathing. By the 18th century, this phonetic approach had become highly formalized. Lindley Murray, author of the most influential grammar of the period, stated that "the Comma represents the shortest pause; the Semicolon, a pause double that of the comma; the Colon, double that of the semicolon; and the Period, double that of the colon." This mechanical approach created a precise hierarchy of pauses that readers could follow when reading texts aloud. The breathing theory of punctuation made perfect sense in a world where most reading was done aloud and where punctuation served primarily to guide oral performance. However, as silent reading became increasingly common and written texts grew more complex, this approach proved too limited. It couldn't adequately address the structural relationships between different parts of a sentence or clarify meaning in more sophisticated ways. This limitation would eventually lead to a fundamental shift in how people thought about punctuation.

Chapter 3: The Grammar Revolution: From Sound to Structure

As literacy expanded during the late Middle Ages and Renaissance, a profound shift occurred in how people thought about punctuation. While early punctuation had been primarily about breathing and speaking, a new perspective emerged: grammar. This grammatical approach focused on using punctuation to show the structural relationships between different parts of a sentence, rather than just indicating where to pause when reading aloud. This shift began in earnest during the 16th century, when scholarly writers started taking a serious interest in punctuation as part of orthography (correct spelling and writing). Ben Jonson, the famous playwright, was also a grammarian who wrote an English Grammar in the early 1600s. He described punctuation as being "dispersed like the blood and spirits throughout the whole" of language - a vivid metaphor suggesting that punctuation was essential to showing the grammatical structure and relationships within sentences. During the 17th and 18th centuries, grammar books increasingly included substantial sections on punctuation, presenting it as a system of rules based on sentence structure rather than breathing patterns. Mark Lewis published Plain and Short Rules for Pointing Periods Grammatically around 1672, while Bishop Lowth's influential A Short Introduction to English Grammar (1762) included a chapter on punctuation that emphasized its grammatical basis. Joseph Robertson's An Essay on Punctuation (1785) defined punctuation as "the art of dividing a discourse into periods, and those periods into their constituent parts," with no mention of pronunciation at all. The grammatical approach introduced specific rules about where to place commas, semicolons, and colons based on sentence structure rather than speaking rhythm. For example, Robertson insisted that a comma should not be inserted between the subject and verb of a clause - a rule that had nothing to do with breathing and everything to do with maintaining grammatical integrity. However, even these grammar-focused writers admitted that their rules had exceptions and that much "must be left to the judgement and taste of the writer." This shift from a breathing-based to a grammar-based understanding of punctuation represents one of the most significant transformations in the history of written language. It reflected the growing importance of silent reading and the increasing complexity of written texts. Rather than simply guiding oral performance, punctuation now served to clarify meaning and structure for readers engaging directly with the text. This tension between punctuation as an aid to speaking and punctuation as a guide to grammatical structure continues to influence how we think about these marks today.

Chapter 4: The Battle for Control: Authors vs. Printers

When William Caxton introduced the printing press to England in the 1470s, he faced a dilemma: manuscripts showed wildly varying punctuation practices, from texts with hardly any marks to those displaying idiosyncratic arrays of symbols. How should these be typeset? This technological innovation sparked a centuries-long tug-of-war between authors and printers over who controlled punctuation - a battle that continues in various forms today. Caxton's own punctuation was sporadic and inconsistent by modern standards. In his preface to a translation of Virgil's Aeneid, he uses periods and forward slashes somewhat randomly, with no consistent pattern. There are no commas, semicolons, or quotation marks - these would come later as printing practices evolved. By the end of the 16th century, a more standardized system began to emerge, but printers and authors often disagreed about how to use it. Some authors were scrupulous about punctuation and insisted on checking every mark. Ben Jonson became furious if printers changed anything, calling one printer a "lewd printer" and an "absolute knave" and complaining that "with his delays and vexations I am almost become blind." John Dryden similarly complained that "the Printer is a beast, and understands nothing I can say to him of correcting the press." Other authors, however, couldn't have cared less about punctuation. William Wordsworth admitted he was "no adept" at punctuation and asked a friend to correct his poems before sending them directly to the printer. Printers developed their own views on punctuation, often seeing themselves as the guardians of clarity and consistency. John Smith's Printer's Grammar (1755) noted that "most Authors expect the Printer to spell, point, and digest their Copy, that it may be intelligible and significant to the Reader." By the 19th century, publishers employed professional proof-readers and copy-editors to standardize punctuation according to house styles. Thomas Mackellar's The American Printer (1866) observed that "the world is little aware how greatly many authors are indebted to a competent proof-reader" for correcting their punctuation. This battle between authorial intention and publishing convention reveals a fundamental tension in how punctuation functions. Is it primarily a tool for personal expression, allowing writers to guide readers through text according to their unique vision? Or is it a standardized system that should follow consistent rules to ensure clarity for readers? Mark Twain captured this tension perfectly when he wrote in 1898: "Nine-tenths of the labor & vexation put upon me by Messrs. Spottiswoode & Co consists in annihilating their ignorant & purposeless punctuation & restoring my own." The conflict between authors and printers demonstrates that punctuation has never been governed by absolute rules but has always involved negotiation between competing priorities - personal expression versus standardization, innovation versus tradition, individual choice versus collective understanding. This tension continues today in the relationship between writers and editors, and in debates about how punctuation should adapt to new forms of communication.

Chapter 5: The Digital Transformation: Punctuation in the Internet Age

The arrival of the Internet has transformed punctuation in ways that would astonish the monks who first developed the system. In digital communication, punctuation has taken on new meanings and functions that go far beyond marking grammatical structures or breathing pauses. This revolution has been driven by the need to convey tone and emotion in text-only environments where we lack the facial expressions and voice modulations that normally help communicate attitude and feeling. Perhaps the most striking change is the semantic shift in the period or full stop. Traditionally the most neutral of punctuation marks, in text messages and instant messaging the period has acquired an emotional charge. As linguist Ben Crair observed, "The Period Is Pissed: When did our plainest punctuation mark become so aggressive?" In a communication style where the default end-of-message punctuation is simply hitting return, using a period conveys a seriousness or finality that can be interpreted as curtness or even anger. Consider these exchanges: "what time do we meet" "seven oclock" (neutral) "seven oclock." (potentially annoyed or impatient) Exclamation marks have proliferated online as people seek to add warmth and enthusiasm to their messages. Studies show that in electronic communication, less than 10% of exclamation marks indicate strong emotions; instead, they're used primarily for thanking, appreciating, welcoming, and contributing to a supportive communication style. Multiple exclamation marks (!!!) have become common, creating what linguists call "punctuation inflation" - once you start using exclamations, it becomes difficult to stop without seeming less enthusiastic in subsequent messages. Ellipsis dots (...) have gained new functions in digital contexts. Beyond their traditional role showing omission, they can indicate that the sender is about to send a further message, signal that options are available in a menu, or report on the status of an operation ("Downloading..."). Question marks are increasingly used at the ends of statements to reflect "uptalk" - the rising intonation pattern that invites listener feedback or checks for understanding. Perhaps most creative of all are emoticons and emojis, which function as a new form of punctuation, adding emotional context to messages. The semicolon has even found new life as the wink in the ;) emoticon, while parentheses form the basis for smiles and frowns. These developments aren't signs of linguistic decay but creative adaptations to the challenges of text-only communication, where we lack the facial expressions and tones of voice that express attitude in face-to-face conversations. The digital transformation of punctuation reminds us that these marks have always evolved to meet changing communicative needs. Just as the printing press prompted standardization of punctuation practices in the 15th century, digital communication is driving new conventions appropriate to new contexts. Rather than seeing these changes as corruption of proper punctuation, we might better view them as evidence of punctuation's remarkable adaptability - its capacity to evolve while continuing to serve its fundamental purpose of making written communication clearer and more expressive.

Chapter 6: The Great Debates: Why Commas and Apostrophes Divide Us

Few linguistic issues provoke as much passion as punctuation disputes. The most heated of these controversies center around two seemingly minor marks: the serial comma and the apostrophe. These debates reveal how deeply punctuation is tied to issues of identity, education, and social belonging, transforming technical questions into cultural battlegrounds. The serial comma (also called the Oxford comma) is the comma placed before the final "and" or "or" in a list of three or more items: "red, white, and blue." Those who favor it argue it prevents ambiguity. The classic example comes from a possibly apocryphal book dedication: "To my parents, Ayn Rand and God." Without the serial comma, this suggests the writer's parents are Ayn Rand and God! However, opponents argue it's usually unnecessary and creates clutter. This debate divides not just individuals but entire professions and nations - American publishers generally favor it, while British newspapers typically omit it. The apostrophe generates even more heated disputes. The Apostrophe Protection Society was founded in 2001 by a retired journalist disturbed by the "ignorance and laziness" he saw in apostrophe misuse. Common errors include using apostrophes with plurals ("apple's for sale"), omitting them from possessives ("the dogs bowl"), and confusing "its" (possessive) with "it's" (contraction of "it is"). The situation is complicated by genuine ambiguities in the system - why do we write "children's" but "its"? Why "women's" but not "hers"? These debates often become proxy wars about education, class, and authority. Those who insist on "correct" usage may be seen as pedantic or elitist, while those who disregard traditional rules may be viewed as ignorant or careless. In 2019, the Apostrophe Protection Society closed down, with its founder lamenting that "the ignorance and laziness present in modern times have won." Yet others celebrate the evolution of punctuation as a natural linguistic process. What makes these debates so passionate is that punctuation carries social meaning beyond its grammatical function. Using punctuation "correctly" signals education and attention to detail. As linguist David Crystal notes, "Punctuation is not just a matter of rules; it's a matter of personal taste, house style, genre conventions, and historical change." Understanding this helps explain why reasonable people can become so unreasonable when discussing the humble comma or apostrophe. The intensity of punctuation debates also reflects anxiety about language change more broadly. In a world where communication norms are rapidly evolving due to technology and globalization, punctuation becomes a symbolic battleground for larger concerns about standards, authority, and tradition. Those who defend traditional punctuation rules often see themselves as preserving important cultural values against the tide of carelessness and ignorance. Those who embrace change see themselves as adapting to new communicative needs in a changing world. Perhaps the most productive approach to these debates is to recognize that punctuation has always been evolving, always contested, and always a matter of both convention and choice. The serial comma and apostrophe controversies aren't signs of linguistic decay but evidence of the ongoing negotiation between clarity, convention, and creativity that has characterized punctuation throughout its history.

Chapter 7: The Creative License: How Writers Break Rules for Effect

Great writers have always known that punctuation is not just a set of rules to follow but a powerful tool for creative expression. By breaking conventional punctuation patterns, authors can create distinctive voices, control the rhythm of their prose, and even change how readers experience their work. This literary license with punctuation reveals its expressive potential beyond mere grammatical correctness. Jane Austen's original manuscripts show a punctuation style dramatically different from what appears in published editions of her novels. Her handwritten texts feature abundant dashes and sparse commas, creating a conversational, dynamic flow. As scholar Kathryn Sutherland discovered, publishers normalized her punctuation to conform to grammatical standards of the time. Compare Austen's original "Mrs. Clay's affections had overpowered her Interest, & she had sacrificed for the Young Man's sake, the possibility of scheming longer for Sir Walter;--" with the published version: "Mrs. Clay's affections had overpowered her interest, and she had sacrificed, for the young man's sake, the possibility of scheming longer for Sir Walter." The difference in rhythm and emphasis is substantial. Emily Dickinson used dashes extensively, creating her distinctive poetic rhythm. When editors "corrected" her punctuation, they fundamentally altered the experience of reading her poems. Compare "Our share of night to bear – / Our share of morning –" with the regularized "Our share of night to bear, / Our share of morning," and you immediately feel the difference in pacing and emphasis. The dashes create pauses that mimic natural speech patterns and emotional hesitations, giving her poetry its characteristic breathless quality. Modern authors continue this tradition of punctuation experimentation. Cormac McCarthy avoids quotation marks and most commas, creating a stark, unadorned style that matches his often apocalyptic themes. In The Road, dialogue appears without quotation marks: "What if the boat washes away? the boy said. / It wont wash away. / It could." This technique creates a dreamlike quality where the boundaries between speech, thought, and narration blur. James Joyce pushed even further in Ulysses, where Molly Bloom's famous soliloquy runs for over forty pages with almost no punctuation at all, mimicking the flow of unfiltered consciousness. E.E. Cummings manipulated not just punctuation but capitalization and spacing to create visual poems that challenge conventional reading. His experiments show how punctuation affects not just how we read but how we see text on the page. Poet Roger McGough explains his own minimal punctuation: "My poems are usually short and I like a clean page. All too often, punctuation squiggles seem to gather like dust." For McGough, the visual aesthetics of the page are as important as the grammatical structure of the sentences. These literary innovations remind us that punctuation is not just about rules but about rhythm, voice, and visual aesthetics. Great writers understand that breaking punctuation conventions can create powerful effects - slowing readers down, speeding them up, creating emphasis, suggesting hesitation, or mimicking thought patterns. By studying how literary masters use punctuation creatively, we gain insight into how these seemingly minor marks can transform the reading experience and open new possibilities for expression. The creative license that writers take with punctuation doesn't undermine the system but enriches it, demonstrating its flexibility and expressive potential. Far from being a rigid set of rules, punctuation is a sophisticated tool that can be deployed with subtlety and imagination to create meaning beyond what words alone can convey.

Summary

The story of English punctuation reveals a fascinating journey from ancient manuscripts with no word spaces to the complex system we use today. What began as simple marks to guide breathing while reading aloud evolved into a sophisticated system that helps us navigate the structure of written language. Along the way, punctuation has been shaped by competing forces: the need to represent speech, the demands of grammar, the preferences of printers, and the creative impulses of writers. Perhaps the most important insight from this history is that punctuation has never been a fixed system governed by absolute rules. It has always been evolving, always contested, always a matter of both convention and personal choice. The digital revolution continues this evolution, as periods take on new emotional meanings in text messages and exclamation marks proliferate online. Understanding this history helps us see current debates about the Oxford comma or apostrophe use not as signs of linguistic decay but as part of the ongoing negotiation between clarity, convention, and creativity that has always characterized punctuation. Rather than seeing punctuation as a set of rigid rules to be followed, we might better view it as a flexible tool that helps us communicate more effectively - a tool that, like language itself, adapts to our changing needs and circumstances.

About Author

Loading...

David Crystal

David Crystal works from his home in Holyhead, North Wales, as a writer, editor, lecturer, and broadcaster. Born in Lisburn, Northern Ireland in 1941, he spent his early years in Holyhead. His family moved to Liverpool in 1951, and he received his secondary schooling at St Mary's College. He read English at University College London (1959-62), specialised in English language studies, did some research there at the Survey of English Usage under Randolph Quirk (1962-3), then joined academic life as a lecturer in linguistics, first at Bangor, then at Reading. He published the first of his 100 or so books in 1964, and became known chiefly for his research work in English language studies, in such fields as intonation and stylistics, and in the application of linguistics to religious, educational and clinical contexts, notably in the development of a range of linguistic profiling techniques for diagnostic and therapeutic purposes. He held a chair at the University of Reading for 10 years, and is now Honorary Professor of Linguistics at the University of Wales, Bangor. These days he divides his time between work on language and work on internet applications.source: http://www.davidcrystal.com/

Read more

Related Books by David Crystal

Loading...

How Language Works

David Crystal

How Babies Babble, Words Change Meaning, and Languages Live or Die

★★★½☆3.9