Millionaire Teacher

Millionaire Teacher Plot Summary

Introduction

Imagine discovering that one of your high school teachers has a net worth of over a million dollars. Not through inheritance, lottery, or high-stakes gambling - but through methodical investing on a teacher's salary. Surprising, isn't it? Yet this revelation challenges everything we think we know about wealth building in today's world. Most people assume that getting rich requires a high-paying career, lucky stock picks, or taking enormous risks. The financial industry reinforces these beliefs by making investing seem complicated, requiring expert guidance and expensive products. But what if the path to financial independence is actually simpler than we've been led to believe? What if the basics of building wealth were so straightforward they could be distilled into nine fundamental rules - rules that should have been taught in every high school classroom, but rarely are? These principles, when understood and consistently applied, can transform an ordinary income into extraordinary wealth.

Chapter 1: Rule 1: Spend Like You Want to Grow Rich

The first rule of building wealth might surprise you - it's not about making more money, but about how you spend the money you have. Most people believe wealth comes from high incomes, but in reality, wealth comes from the gap between what you earn and what you spend. The wider this gap, the faster your wealth grows. Consider the story of a seemingly wealthy American family in Singapore that the author encountered. They lived in a massive house, drove a Jaguar (which in Singapore would cost over $250,000), and the mother wore an elegant Rolex watch. However, when it came time to pay the author for tutoring their son, their check repeatedly bounced. Despite all outward appearances of wealth, they were actually drowning in debt, living paycheck to paycheck to maintain their lifestyle. This family perfectly illustrates how appearances can be deceiving when it comes to real wealth. Thomas Stanley, who spent years researching America's wealthy, discovered something surprising: most U.S. homes valued at a million dollars or more aren't owned by millionaires. Instead, they're owned by people with large mortgages and expensive tastes. In contrast, 90 percent of actual millionaires (with net worth exceeding $1 million) lived in homes valued at less than a million dollars. True wealth isn't about displaying status symbols; it's about having enough money to never have to work again if you choose. The author learned frugality early. Growing up as one of four children raised on a mechanic's salary, he bought his own clothes from age 15 and his own car at 16 from part-time work. His father drove a 1975 Datsun with a hole in the floor and a broken speedometer. This background taught him that perceptions dictate spending habits - by comparing upward to those with more, we constantly feel deprived and spend more. By comparing downward and being satisfied with what we have, we naturally spend less and save more. What about cars? Contrary to popular belief, most millionaires drive modest vehicles. In 2009, the median price paid for a car by U.S. millionaires was $31,367, with Toyota being the most popular brand. Even Warren Buffett, one of the world's richest men, drives a $55,000 Cadillac - the most expensive car he's ever owned. The money saved on cars and other status symbols can instead be invested to build actual wealth. By controlling spending and avoiding the trap of trying to appear wealthy, anyone with a middle-class income can lay the groundwork for becoming genuinely rich. The author proved this by becoming a millionaire in his 30s on a teacher's salary - not through deprivation, but through mindful spending and consistent investing of the difference.

Chapter 2: Rule 2: Use the Greatest Investment Ally You Have

Time is the greatest investment ally you have, yet it's routinely underestimated by most investors. Warren Buffett, who has long jockeyed with Bill Gates for the title of "World's Richest Man," bought his first stock at age 11 and jokes that he started too late. The power of starting early cannot be overstated when it comes to building wealth. Buffett famously quips: "Preparation is everything. Noah did not start building the Ark when it was raining." This analogy perfectly captures the importance of beginning your investment journey before you feel the urgency. Like Noah preparing for the flood, investors who start early gain an insurmountable advantage through what Albert Einstein allegedly called "the most powerful force in the universe" - compound interest. Consider this illuminating tale of Star, raised by her Bohemian mother Autumn. From age five, Star collected recyclable cans and bottles, earning $1.45 daily. Her mother invested this money in the stock market, where it earned an average of 9% annually. Even after Star grew up, she continued sending her mother $45 monthly (roughly $1.45 daily) to invest. Meanwhile, Star's friend Lucy, a New York investment banker, lived the "good life" with her BMW, gourmet dining, and designer clothes, not starting to save until age 40 when she began investing $800 monthly. The results? By age 65, Star had invested a total of $32,400 over her lifetime and turned it into more than $1,050,180. Lucy, despite investing nearly eight times more money ($240,000), ended up with just $813,128. The difference wasn't intelligence or income - it was simply time. Star's earlier start allowed compound interest to work its magic for decades longer. This mathematical miracle works because compound interest creates a snowball effect. When $100 grows by 10% annually, it becomes $110 after one year. The second year, that $110 grows by 10% to $121. By year three, you're starting with $121, which grows to $133.10. This acceleration continues, turning $100 into $11,739.08 after 50 years and a staggering $1,378,061.23 after 100 years at that same 10% rate. Before rushing to invest, however, pay off high-interest loans first. Credit cards charging 18-24% interest annually create a financial drain that no investment can overcome. Paying off credit card debt that charges 18% is effectively like making a guaranteed, tax-free 18% return on your money - far better than any investment can reliably provide. Understanding where investment returns come from helps demystify the process. When you buy shares in a company, you're becoming a partial owner of that business. As the business grows its profits over time, your share value typically rises as well. You make money either through dividends (cash distributions of profits) or by selling your shares at a higher price than you paid. The stock market has averaged returns exceeding 9% annually over the past 90 years, including all major crashes. The powerful combination of starting early, investing regularly, and harnessing compound interest can allow even middle-income earners to build substantial wealth over time. The key is patience and consistency, letting your money work for you over decades rather than trying to get rich quick.

Chapter 3: Rule 3: Keep Investment Costs Low with Index Funds

Most financial advisers are salespeople who put their own financial interests ahead of yours. They sell investment products that pay them well, while your financial wellbeing takes a distant second place. This harsh reality means the average investor faces a disadvantage before even making their first investment. Take Muhammad Ali's proposed boxing match with Wilt Chamberlain. When basketball star Chamberlain suggested he could beat the undefeated Ali, most of the sporting world knew better. Chamberlain's odds of winning were ridiculously low. Similarly, when challenging financial professionals at what they do best, common sense suggests poor odds for the average person. However, investing presents a remarkable exception - one where a fifth grader with the right knowledge can outperform Wall Street professionals. Index funds are the key to this investment advantage. While a book's index represents everything inside it, a stock market index represents the entire market. When you buy a total stock market index fund, you're purchasing a single product containing thousands of stocks representing the entire market. With just three index funds - a home country stock market index, an international stock market index, and a government bond market index - you can spread your investments across nearly every available global asset. The evidence supporting index investing is overwhelming. Warren Buffett, the world's greatest investor, recommends index funds for most people. Nobel Prize-winning economists, including Paul Samuelson, David Kahneman, Merton Miller, Robert Merton, and William F. Sharpe all advocate for index investing. As Sharpe noted, financial advisers who recommend actively managed funds over indexes are essentially "assuming that the laws of arithmetic have been suspended for the convenience of those who choose to pursue careers as active managers." Why do index funds outperform actively managed funds? Five factors drag down the returns of actively managed mutual funds: expense ratios, 12B1 fees, trading costs, sales commissions, and taxes. These hidden costs might seem small when presented as percentages (like 1.5% for expense ratios), but they extract billions from investors' returns. In one example, a $30 billion fund would cost investors about $450 million every year in expense ratio fees alone. The author's wife experienced this exploitation firsthand. Before they were married, she was paying her adviser at Raymond James an additional 1.75% annual "wrap fee" on top of all the hidden mutual fund fees. The author calculated that her $200,000 account would have been $20,000 better off in just five years had she used index funds instead. When she questioned her adviser about the poor performance, he suggested switching to different actively managed funds rather than index funds - because index funds wouldn't generate commissions for him. Studies repeatedly confirm index funds' superiority. One 15-year study published in the Journal of Portfolio Management found that 96% of actively managed mutual funds underperformed the market index after fees, taxes, and survivorship bias. Even The New York Times ran a contest pitting high-profile financial advisers against the S&P 500 index, and after just seven years, the advisers' performance was so embarrassingly poor compared to the index that the newspaper discontinued the contest. For Americans, Vanguard offers the easiest path to indexing, as a nonprofit financial service company and the world's largest provider of index funds. Global citizens can access index funds too, with Vanguard expanding to other countries and various brokerages offering similar low-cost options worldwide. The evidence is clear: investors who use index funds instead of actively managed funds can feasibly invest half as much money as their neighbors while still ending up with twice as much wealth over their lifetime.

Chapter 4: Rule 4: Understand Market Psychology

Most investors become their own worst enemies through irrational behaviors driven by fear and greed. This self-sabotage costs the average investor roughly 2.7% annually in returns - an expensive habit that can reduce a portfolio by hundreds of thousands of dollars over an investing lifetime. Consider this startling statistic: while the average mutual fund reported a 10% annual gain from 1980 to 2005, investors in those same funds averaged just 7.3% annually. Why? Because investors tend to buy high and sell low - the exact opposite of successful investing. When fund prices rise, investors feel good and buy more; when prices fall, they feel bad and limit purchases or sell. This behavior ensures they pay higher-than-average prices for their investments over time. The solution is surprisingly simple: adopt a mechanical investment strategy and stick with it regardless of market conditions. By investing the same amount each month into index funds (a practice called "dollar-cost averaging"), you'll automatically buy fewer shares when prices are high and more shares when prices are low. Over time, this disciplined approach leads to significantly better returns than trying to time the market. Market timing - jumping in and out of investments based on predictions about market movements - is a losing strategy for almost everyone. As Vanguard founder John Bogle stated after nearly 50 years in the business: "I do not know of anybody who has done it successfully and consistently. I don't even know anybody who knows anybody who has done it successfully and consistently." Missing just the 10 best trading days in the market between 1982 and 2005 would have reduced your returns from 10.6% annually to just 8.1%. Understanding what stocks truly represent helps overcome emotional investing. The stock market isn't just squiggly lines on a chart - it's a collection of businesses. When you own shares in a stock market index fund, you own real assets: land, buildings, brand names, machinery, and products. Long-term, stock prices reflect the fortunes of the businesses they represent. Over shorter periods, however, the market can behave irrationally. The author uses a compelling metaphor: the stock market is like a dog on a leash. The dog (stock prices) might sprint ahead or lag behind the owner (business earnings), but ultimately cannot get too far in either direction because of the leash connecting them. When stock prices race far ahead of business earnings, as they did with Coca-Cola in the 1990s, they eventually must slow down or fall back. Conversely, when prices fall far below what business fundamentals justify, they eventually rebound. The author personally benefited from this understanding during market crashes. After the 9/11 attacks in 2001, when most investors panicked, he recognized that the 20% market drop wouldn't permanently affect the profits of businesses like Coca-Cola, McDonald's, or Starbucks. He invested heavily, and by January 2011, those investments had gained over 55%. Similar opportunities arose during the Iraq War in 2003 and the financial crisis of 2008-2009, when the author sold bonds to buy stocks at discount prices. The ultimate irony? While the author celebrated these market drops as buying opportunities, most investors did the opposite. During the late 1990s when prices were sky-high, investors poured $650 billion into stock mutual funds. Then in 2008-2009, during the biggest market decline since the Great Depression, they withdrew over $228 billion - selling low after buying high. By understanding market psychology and remaining disciplined, you can avoid these costly mistakes and significantly improve your investment returns.

Chapter 5: Rule 5: Build a Balanced Portfolio

A total stock market index fund might be a good investment, but alone it doesn't represent a balanced portfolio. If that were all you bought, your entire portfolio would fluctuate wildly with the stock market - dropping 20% or even 50% during market downturns. This kind of volatility isn't appropriate for any investor, especially those approaching retirement. This is where bonds come in - they act as parachutes when stock markets fall. A bond is essentially a loan you make to a government or corporation. In exchange, they pay you interest and eventually return your principal. Bonds don't make as much money as stocks over the long term, but they provide stability during market turbulence. The safest bonds are first-world government bonds from high-income industrial countries, followed by bonds from blue-chip businesses like Coca-Cola, Walmart, and Johnson & Johnson. Short-term bonds (one to three years) are generally safer than long-term bonds because they're less vulnerable to inflation eroding their value. For simplicity, you can buy a short-term government bond index fund that keeps pace with inflation and can be sold whenever needed. How much of your portfolio should be in bonds? A common rule of thumb is to have a bond allocation roughly equivalent to your age. Some experts suggest your age minus 10 or 20 if you want to be more aggressive. This means a 30-year-old might have 30% in bonds and 70% in stocks, while a 60-year-old would have 60% in bonds and 40% in stocks. This gradual shift toward bonds as you age provides greater stability when you need it most. The author demonstrated the effectiveness of this approach during the 2008-2009 financial crisis. Starting 2008 with about 35% of his portfolio in bonds, he followed a disciplined rebalancing strategy as markets fell. When stocks dropped and bonds became a disproportionately larger percentage of his portfolio, he sold some bonds to buy more stocks at discounted prices. As markets recovered, he did the opposite - selling some appreciated stocks to buy more bonds. This disciplined approach allowed him to take advantage of market volatility rather than being victimized by it. Scott Burns, a former columnist with The Dallas Morning News, popularized an even simpler approach called the "Couch Potato Portfolio." It consists of just two investments: 50% in a total stock market index and 50% in a total bond market index. An investor simply rebalances once a year, selling a portion of whichever investment performed better to buy more of the other. Despite its simplicity and conservative nature, this approach averaged 10.96% annually from 1986 to 2001. During market crashes, such balanced portfolios significantly outperform all-stock portfolios in terms of stability. In 2008, when the average U.S. stock market mutual fund dropped 29.1%, the indexed Couch Potato Portfolio fell just 20.4%. Even more remarkably, from 1975 to 2010, a Canadian version of the Couch Potato Portfolio with stocks and bonds actually outperformed the Canadian stock market index alone - proving that safety doesn't necessarily come at the expense of returns. The author encountered many investors during the 2008-2009 crisis whose portfolios had collapsed 40% or more. Most had little or no bonds in their accounts despite being in their 50s or 60s. Without bonds, they couldn't take advantage of cheaper stock prices because they had nothing to sell. A properly balanced portfolio not only provides stability during downturns but also gives you the resources to capitalize on opportunities when they arise.

Chapter 6: Rule 6: Create Your Global Investment Strategy

Creating a portfolio of index funds is surprisingly simple regardless of where you live. By examining real-life examples from different countries, you can see how investors worldwide have built successful indexed portfolios tailored to their specific circumstances. In the United States, Kris Olson, a 40-year-old doctor and father of triplets, recognized that his financial adviser was skimming money from his investments through hidden fees. "I was flushing money down the toilet in tiny sums that were adding up," he said. After meeting with the author, Kris opened an account with Vanguard and established a simple three-fund portfolio: 35% in Vanguard's U.S. Bond Index, 35% in Vanguard's Total U.S. Stock Market Index, and 30% in Vanguard's Total International Stock Market Index. Kris's approach was systematic and disciplined. He spent just 10 minutes each January rebalancing his portfolio back to its original allocation, selling portions of whatever had performed best to buy more of the laggards. Despite going through the worst stock market decline since the Great Depression, his account gained 30.7% from January 2006 to January 2011, handily outperforming professionally managed balanced funds from Fidelity, T. Rowe Price, and American Funds. For those wanting even less work, Vanguard offers Target Retirement Funds that automatically maintain an age-appropriate stock/bond allocation without any rebalancing required. In Canada, Keith Wakelin, a competitive long-distance runner and landscaper, built a portfolio of exchange-traded funds (ETFs) following the "Global Couch Potato Portfolio" concept. His allocation was 20% international stocks, 20% Canadian stocks, 20% U.S. stocks, and 40% Canadian bonds. By rebalancing annually, Keith earned a total return of 28.5% from January 2005 to January 2011, outperforming four out of five of Canada's most respected balanced mutual funds. Canadians can replicate this approach through TD Bank's low-cost e-Series Index Funds or through discount brokerages offering ETFs. In Singapore, Gordon Cyr and his wife Seng Su Lin built a globally diversified portfolio after Gordon had a negative experience with an offshore investment company. They opened an account with DBS Vickers and created a balanced portfolio with 20% in Singapore's Bond Index, 20% in Singapore's Stock Market Index, 20% in Canada's Short-Term Bond Index, 20% in Canada's Stock Market Index, and 20% in the World Stock Market Index. This diversification reflected their uncertainty about where they might eventually retire, with family ties in Singapore, Canada, and property in Hawaii. In Australia, 28-year-old blogger Neerav Bhatt discovered Vanguard's Australian operation while researching index funds. He found that most Australians were unaware of Vanguard because financial advisers rarely mentioned it, preferring to sell high-cost products that generated commissions. Australians can open accounts directly with Vanguard and invest in their Life Strategy Funds, which offer different stock/bond allocations based on risk tolerance and charge lower fees as account balances grow. Across all these examples, several principles remain constant: keep costs low, maintain a balanced allocation between stocks and bonds appropriate for your age and circumstances, diversify globally, and rebalance periodically. The time commitment is minimal - often less than one hour per year - yet the financial benefits are substantial. By following these principles, ordinary people from around the world have created investment portfolios that consistently outperform expensive actively managed funds while requiring far less effort to maintain.

Chapter 7: Rule 7: Avoid Expensive Financial Advice

If you've read this far and plan to open an indexed account, you might face resistance when breaking free from your current financial adviser. The financial industry has developed sophisticated strategies to keep clients invested in high-fee products, metaphorically ensuring you climb Mount Kilimanjaro with a 50-pound pack on your back. When clients mention index funds, advisers typically counter with several rehearsed arguments. First, they'll claim that "index funds are dangerous when stock markets fall" because active managers can move to cash before market drops. This is demonstrably false - a Standard & Poor's study cited in The Wall Street Journal showed that the vast majority of actively managed funds still lost to their counterpart indexes during the 2008 crash. Clearly, active managers weren't able to predict or avoid the market decline. Another common rebuttal: "You can't beat the market with an index fund - they give just average returns." This argument ignores the impact of fees. If actively managed funds had no costs associated with them - no expense ratios, no trading costs, no taxes, and if advisers worked for free - then yes, index funds would provide "average" returns. In reality, these costs drag down active fund performance so significantly that index funds routinely outperform 80-90% of actively managed funds over time. Many advisers will show you funds that have beaten the indexes historically, claiming they'll only buy you "the best funds." This backwards-looking approach is like saying, "Here are the champions who won the British Open over the past 15 years. This qualifies me to pick the next 15 years' worth of champions." Studies consistently show that past performance does not predict future results. Even Morningstar's top-rated funds usually underperform indexes in subsequent years. Some advisers will claim their professional expertise allows them to move your money between funds to take advantage of market trends. This is particularly absurd given that most financial advisers receive minimal investment training. A certified financial planner needs just one year of sales experience and fewer than six months of academic training before certification. As investment writer William Bernstein noted, reading just two classic investment books would give you more knowledge than "99 percent of all stockbrokers and most other finance professionals." The author witnessed this knowledge gap firsthand when accompanying friends to financial institutions. In one revealing encounter, an adviser admitted that her bank instructed her to first sell expensive "fund of funds" products to less knowledgeable clients, then offer in-house actively managed funds to more informed investors, and only provide index funds if clients specifically requested them and couldn't be talked out of them. This resistance to index funds makes sense when you understand the industry's incentive structure. The average U.S. broker makes nearly $150,000 annually - more than most lawyers, doctors, or university professors. If clients switched to index funds, this income would disappear. As Jack Meyer, former leader of Harvard University's endowment fund, bluntly stated: "The investment business is a giant scam. It deletes billions of dollars every year in transaction costs and fees... You should simply hold index funds. No doubt about it." Even professional pension fund managers, who sit at the top of the financial knowledge hierarchy, increasingly recognize this reality. Washington state's pension fund has 100% of its stock market assets in indexes, California has 86% indexed, New York has 75% indexed, and Connecticut has 84% indexed. Meanwhile, about 95% of individual investors still buy actively managed funds - unaware that the extra fees will likely cost them more than half their potential retirement portfolios over time. The financial industry won't change without regulation, but you don't have to wait. By understanding these sales tactics and standing your ground, you can avoid becoming another victim of this costly system. Remember: it's your money, not theirs.

Summary

The nine rules presented throughout these pages form a comprehensive roadmap that can transform an ordinary income into extraordinary wealth. From spending mindfully to harnessing the power of compound interest, from embracing low-cost index funds to maintaining a balanced portfolio through market turbulence - these principles work together to create a remarkably effective wealth-building machine that almost anyone can implement. As the author powerfully states: "You can invest half of what your neighbors invest over your lifetime and still end up with twice as much money as they do." This isn't about getting lucky or finding the next hot stock - it's about following time-tested principles that the financial industry often obscures because they don't generate high commissions. Today, take just one action: calculate your current investment fees and consider how a low-cost indexed approach might transform your financial future. The wealth you build will be your own, not a financial adviser's.

About Author

Loading...

Andrew Hallam

I have a romantic idea. It isn't the red roses, candlelight dinner kind of thing (although that's a nice notion too).Instead, I want to help people spend time with the people and passions they love. Sound corny? Bear with me for a moment.Financial independence buys time. That's where my books and talks come in. I want to show people how to invest. The financial industry says, "Hey, let us help!" But few enter this industry to make the world a better place. Would Mother Teresa (or any of her friends) have worked for Goldman Sachs? Instead, with few exceptions, it's an industry of vultures. So let me show you how to find the right kind of (rare) financial advisor, or invest on your own.This will give you financial freedom. You'll be able to spend time on your loves, passions–and perhaps, even a few more candlelight dinners.

Read more