On Palestine

On Palestine Plot Summary

Introduction

The conflict in Palestine stands as one of history's most persistent struggles, spanning over a century and evolving through multiple phases of occupation, resistance, and international diplomacy. What began as European colonial ambitions in the late 19th century has transformed into one of the world's most complex geopolitical conflicts, characterized by asymmetric power relations, competing narratives, and seemingly intractable positions. Through understanding this history, we gain insight into how modern occupation systems function, how resistance movements adapt over time, and how international power dynamics shape regional conflicts. The story of Palestine offers critical lessons about settler colonialism, resistance under occupation, and the evolution of international law in the face of prolonged conflict. By examining each historical phase—from early Zionist settlement to the current fragmentation of Palestinian territories—we can trace how occupation strategies have evolved from conventional military control to sophisticated systems of spatial segregation, economic dependence, and demographic engineering. This history reveals not only the structural violence inherent in occupation but also the remarkable resilience of those living under it, whose methods of resistance have continually adapted to changing circumstances. This exploration is essential for anyone seeking to understand modern conflicts, international relations, and the human cost of prolonged military occupation.

Chapter 1: Origins of Zionism and the Seeds of Conflict (1897-1947)

The origins of the Israeli-Palestinian conflict can be traced to the late 19th century, when European Jewish intellectuals, responding to increasing antisemitism across Europe, began developing Zionism as a political movement. The First Zionist Congress in Basel, Switzerland in 1897, led by Theodor Herzl, formally established the movement's goal of creating a "Jewish homeland" in Palestine, then part of the Ottoman Empire. This period saw the beginning of Jewish immigration to Palestine, known as the First Aliyah (1882-1903) and Second Aliyah (1904-1914), laying the groundwork for future settlement. The British Empire's involvement proved decisive during this formative period. After World War I, Britain gained control of Palestine through the Mandate system established by the League of Nations. The 1917 Balfour Declaration, in which Britain expressed support for "the establishment in Palestine of a national home for the Jewish people," created contradictory promises, as Britain had simultaneously made commitments to Arab independence in the region. This dual policy created the fundamental tension that would define the coming decades: increasing Jewish immigration and land purchases were occurring in a land already inhabited by an Arab Palestinian majority who aspired to self-determination. Throughout the 1920s and 1930s, the demographic and economic landscape of Palestine transformed dramatically. Zionist organizations established key institutions like the Jewish Agency, the Histadrut labor federation, and paramilitary groups including the Haganah. These proto-state structures created what was essentially a state-within-a-state. Meanwhile, Palestinian Arabs, witnessing their displacement from lands purchased by Zionist funds, organized politically and eventually rose up in the Arab Revolt of 1936-1939, which was brutally suppressed by British forces with assistance from Zionist militias. World War II and the Holocaust fundamentally altered the dynamics of the conflict. The murder of six million European Jews created moral impetus for a Jewish state and accelerated immigration to Palestine. By 1947, with Britain announcing its intention to withdraw from Palestine, the newly formed United Nations proposed a partition plan dividing the territory into separate Jewish and Arab states. The plan allocated approximately 55% of the land to the proposed Jewish state, despite Jews constituting only one-third of the population and owning less than 7% of the land. Palestinian Arabs, seeing the partition as fundamentally unjust, rejected the plan, while Zionist leadership officially accepted it while privately planning for territorial expansion. This period established the patterns that would define the conflict: competing nationalisms with irreconcilable claims to the same land, international powers making decisions that prioritized their strategic interests over local realities, and the gradual development of asymmetric power relations between a well-organized Zionist movement with international support and a Palestinian community struggling to develop effective political institutions under colonial rule. The seeds planted during these fifty years would bear their bitter fruit in the violent events that followed the end of the British Mandate.

Chapter 2: Ethnic Cleansing and the Birth of Israel (1948-1967)

The period between 1948 and 1967 represents the most profound transformation in Palestinian history, beginning with what Palestinians call the Nakba ("catastrophe") and ending with Israel's conquest of the remaining Palestinian territories. The first Arab-Israeli war erupted following Israel's declaration of independence on May 14, 1948. Contrary to popular narratives of a small Jewish state defending itself against overwhelming Arab armies, recent historical research has revealed that Zionist forces were better organized, equipped, and numerically superior in crucial battles. More significantly, Zionist military operations followed Plan Dalet, a strategic blueprint to secure territory by systematically removing Palestinian populations. The 1948 war resulted in the ethnic cleansing of approximately 750,000 Palestinians from their homes—nearly two-thirds of the Arab population of what became Israel. Israeli forces destroyed over 400 Palestinian villages and towns, erasing them physically from the landscape. Those Palestinians who remained within Israel's borders became second-class citizens under military rule until 1966, subject to land confiscation, movement restrictions, and systematic discrimination. Meanwhile, the expelled Palestinians were scattered across neighboring Arab countries, many in refugee camps that became permanent fixtures, with their right of return explicitly denied by Israeli law. The newly established State of Israel quickly consolidated its position through legislative mechanisms designed to prevent Palestinian return and to transfer Palestinian-owned land to state control. The Absentee Property Law of 1950 confiscated refugee property, while the Land Acquisition Law of 1953 legalized the seizure of land from internal Palestinian refugees who had been displaced within Israel's borders. This legal architecture, combined with the physical destruction of Palestinian communities, represented a comprehensive attempt to erase Palestinian presence and claims to the land. For Palestinians, this period was defined by trauma, dispossession, and the struggle to maintain national identity despite geographic fragmentation. The Palestine Liberation Organization (PLO), established in 1964, emerged as the institutional embodiment of Palestinian nationalism, initially under Arab state patronage but gradually developing independent political positions. In the refugee camps of Lebanon, Jordan, Syria, and Gaza, a new Palestinian political consciousness formed around the central demand for return to their homeland and resistance to permanent exile. The regional dimensions of the conflict intensified during this period, with Israel fighting the Suez War in 1956 alongside Britain and France against Egypt. This conflict demonstrated Israel's emerging role as a strategic asset for Western powers in the Middle East. Meanwhile, Arab governments, while publicly supporting the Palestinian cause, often prioritized their own national interests and state security over Palestinian rights, creating tensions that would later erupt in conflicts like Black September in Jordan. By 1967, the situation had reached another flashpoint. Escalating border tensions, Egyptian military deployments in the Sinai Peninsula, and Israeli threats created conditions for war. The resulting Six-Day War would dramatically expand Israel's territorial control and create a new reality of occupation that continues to shape the conflict today. What began in 1948 as a war over partition had, by 1967, transformed the entire geography of historical Palestine, with profound consequences for all parties to the conflict.

Chapter 3: Expanding Occupation and Palestinian Resistance (1967-1987)

The 1967 Six-Day War marked a watershed moment in the Israeli-Palestinian conflict, establishing a new geographic and political reality that persists to this day. In just six days of fighting, Israel captured the West Bank and East Jerusalem from Jordan, the Gaza Strip and Sinai Peninsula from Egypt, and the Golan Heights from Syria. This swift military victory brought the remaining 22% of historical Palestine under Israeli control, along with approximately one million additional Palestinians who suddenly found themselves living under military occupation. Israel immediately began implementing a dual strategy in the newly occupied territories. While officially maintaining that these were "administered territories" held temporarily for security purposes, the government initiated settlement construction that indicated long-term intentions. The Allon Plan, formulated shortly after the war, proposed retaining strategic areas of the West Bank while concentrating Palestinian populations in disconnected enclaves. This approach established the template for all subsequent Israeli policies: creating "facts on the ground" through settlement construction while avoiding formal annexation that would require granting citizenship to the Palestinian population. By the mid-1970s, this settlement project had accelerated significantly, particularly after the 1977 election of Menachem Begin's Likud government. Settlement expansion followed strategic patterns: creating a ring of Jewish neighborhoods around East Jerusalem to prevent its return to Arab control; establishing settlements along the Jordan Valley to maintain a security buffer; and placing settlements on hilltops throughout the West Bank to fragment Palestinian territorial contiguity. This process was facilitated by complex legal mechanisms that declared vast areas "state land," military zones, or natural reserves, effectively removing them from Palestinian use. For Palestinians living under occupation, daily life became defined by the military control apparatus. Military checkpoints restricted movement, administrative detention allowed imprisonment without trial, and collective punishment measures like house demolitions and curfews became common practice. The economy was systematically subordinated to Israel's, creating dependency relationships that persist today. Palestinians were granted no political rights while being subject to military law, creating a legal system of separate and unequal treatment based on ethno-national identity. Palestinian resistance during this period evolved through several phases. The PLO, operating from bases in Jordan and later Lebanon, conducted armed operations against Israeli targets while simultaneously developing its diplomatic strategy. After being expelled from Lebanon following the 1982 Israeli invasion, the PLO leadership relocated to Tunisia, physically distant from the occupied territories. This distance created space for local Palestinian leadership to emerge within the territories themselves, developing grassroots resistance strategies like civil disobedience, strikes, boycotts, and the creation of alternative institutions. By the mid-1980s, a generation of Palestinians who had grown up entirely under occupation was coming of age. They had witnessed the expansion of settlements, experienced the daily humiliations of military rule, and observed the international community's failure to enforce UN resolutions calling for Israeli withdrawal. The frustration and political consciousness of this generation would erupt in December 1987 in what became known as the First Intifada, a largely unarmed popular uprising that would transform the conflict and force both Israeli society and the international community to confront the reality of occupation that had been normalized over the previous twenty years.

Chapter 4: Failed Peace Processes and the Cycle of Violence (1987-2000)

The First Intifada, which erupted in December 1987, represented a fundamental shift in the dynamics of the Israeli-Palestinian conflict. This largely unarmed popular uprising, characterized by strikes, demonstrations, and civil disobedience, was led by local Palestinians rather than the exiled PLO leadership. Images of stone-throwing youth confronting Israeli tanks captured international attention, challenging Israel's image and exposing the realities of military occupation to global audiences. The uprising demonstrated that the occupation was unsustainable without enormous military resources and moral costs. The changed international landscape following the end of the Cold War created conditions for diplomatic initiatives. The 1991 Madrid Conference brought Israel and Arab states to direct negotiations for the first time, while secret talks in Oslo led to mutual recognition between Israel and the PLO in 1993. The Oslo Accords, signed on the White House lawn with much fanfare, seemed to promise a path toward Palestinian self-determination. The agreements established the Palestinian Authority (PA) as an interim self-government body and divided the occupied territories into different zones of control, with a five-year timeline for final status negotiations on Jerusalem, refugees, settlements, and borders. However, the Oslo process contained fundamental flaws that would undermine its success. It addressed immediate governance issues while postponing the most difficult questions to later negotiations. Meanwhile, it allowed Israel to maintain ultimate control over security, borders, and resources. Most critically, the agreement placed no restrictions on settlement expansion, which accelerated dramatically during the peace process. Between 1993 and 2000, the number of Israeli settlers in the occupied territories nearly doubled, fragmenting Palestinian territory into disconnected enclaves through a network of settlements, bypass roads, and checkpoints. The assassination of Israeli Prime Minister Yitzhak Rabin by a right-wing Israeli extremist in November 1995 delivered a severe blow to the peace process. His successor, Benjamin Netanyahu, openly opposed the Oslo framework and worked to slow its implementation. Meanwhile, the Palestinian Authority, established as a temporary administrative body, increasingly resembled a permanent subcontractor for the occupation, managing Palestinian population centers while Israel maintained ultimate control. Economic conditions deteriorated for most Palestinians, while corruption and authoritarian tendencies grew within the PA. The Camp David Summit of July 2000 represented a last attempt to salvage the Oslo framework. When negotiations collapsed, each side blamed the other. The Israeli narrative portrayed the failure as proof that Palestinians would never accept peace, while Palestinians viewed the proposals as offering disconnected bantustans rather than a viable state. The tensions erupted in September 2000 with the Second Intifada, triggered by Ariel Sharon's provocative visit to the Temple Mount/Haram al-Sharif but fueled by years of frustration over settlement expansion and the failure of the peace process to deliver tangible improvements. This period demonstrated the fundamental contradiction in attempting to build peace while one party continues to expand territorial control over the other. The "peace process" became disconnected from genuine conflict resolution, instead functioning as a diplomatic framework that normalized occupation while failing to address its root causes. By 2000, the territorial viability of a Palestinian state had been severely compromised by settlement expansion, and Palestinian society had become deeply disillusioned with diplomatic processes that seemed to entrench rather than end the occupation.

Chapter 5: Gaza: Laboratory of Incremental Genocide (2000-2014)

The Gaza Strip emerged as the epicenter of the Israeli-Palestinian conflict in the early 21st century, transformed from a neglected territory into what many scholars describe as an "open-air prison" subject to increasingly severe forms of collective punishment. Following Israel's unilateral "disengagement" in 2005, when it removed approximately 8,000 settlers while maintaining control over Gaza's borders, airspace, and maritime access, the territory entered a new phase of isolation. While presented internationally as a step toward peace, statements by Israeli officials like Dov Weissglass revealed the true intent: "The disengagement is actually formaldehyde. It supplies the amount of formaldehyde that is necessary so there will not be a political process with the Palestinians." The democratic election of Hamas in January 2006 triggered an immediate international response. Rather than accepting the results of what international observers deemed a free and fair election, Israel, the United States, and the European Union imposed severe economic sanctions on the Palestinian Authority. When Hamas preempted a planned coup attempt in June 2007 and took full control of Gaza, Israel imposed a comprehensive blockade that severely restricted the movement of people and goods. This siege created a humanitarian crisis by limiting access to food, medicine, construction materials, and other essentials, while effectively imprisoning two million people in an area of just 365 square kilometers. Israel launched a series of increasingly destructive military operations against Gaza during this period. Operation Cast Lead (2008-2009) killed approximately 1,400 Palestinians, the majority civilians, and destroyed significant civilian infrastructure. Operation Pillar of Defense (2012) and Operation Protective Edge (2014) followed similar patterns of disproportionate force. These operations were characterized by the use of heavy weaponry in densely populated areas, attacks on civilian infrastructure including schools and hospitals, and the implementation of the "Dahiya Doctrine" of deliberately inflicting widespread destruction as a deterrent. Each operation left Gaza more devastated, with reconstruction hampered by the continuing blockade. The humanitarian situation deteriorated dramatically during this period. By 2014, unemployment in Gaza exceeded 40%, more than 95% of water was undrinkable, electricity was available for only a few hours daily, and the healthcare system had been severely degraded by shortages and destruction. UN agencies repeatedly warned that Gaza was becoming "uninhabitable." Israeli officials explicitly acknowledged using restrictions on food imports to put Gazans "on a diet," with documents revealing calculations of minimum caloric intake needed to avoid outright starvation while maintaining pressure on the population. International human rights organizations and UN investigators increasingly characterized Israel's policies toward Gaza as potential war crimes and crimes against humanity. The Goldstone Report on the 2008-2009 war found evidence of serious violations of international humanitarian law. Human rights scholars like Richard Falk began using the term "incremental genocide" to describe the cumulative impact of policies designed to make civilian life unsustainable, forcing displacement or surrender of political rights. The deliberate destruction of civilian infrastructure, combined with prevention of reconstruction and economic development, created conditions of permanent humanitarian crisis. Gaza became a testing ground for new methods of population control and surveillance, from remote-controlled weapons systems to sophisticated monitoring technologies. The territory also represented a microcosm of broader Israeli strategies toward Palestinians: separation and fragmentation of territory, economic de-development, collective punishment, and overwhelming military force against resistance. What Israeli military planners euphemistically called "mowing the lawn" became a regular pattern, with periodic escalations of violence maintaining a status quo of subjugation while preventing any meaningful political solution to the underlying conflict.

Chapter 6: Apartheid Reality and the One-State Question (2014-Present)

The period since 2014 has been characterized by the entrenchment of a one-state reality with differentiated rights based on ethno-national identity, leading to growing international recognition of Israel's policies as constituting apartheid. The territorial fragmentation of Palestinian land has reached unprecedented levels, with the West Bank divided into more than 165 disconnected enclaves surrounded by Israeli settlements, military zones, and infrastructure. East Jerusalem has been increasingly isolated from other Palestinian areas through expanding settlement neighborhoods and physical barriers. Meanwhile, Gaza remains under siege, with recurring military operations in 2018, 2021, and 2023 continuing the pattern of massive destruction followed by preventing reconstruction. A series of legislative and political developments has solidified the permanence of this system. The 2018 Nation-State Law formally enshrined Jewish supremacy as a constitutional principle, declaring that "the right to exercise national self-determination in the State of Israel is unique to the Jewish people." Settlement expansion has accelerated, particularly in strategic areas around Jerusalem and the Jordan Valley, eliminating the territorial contiguity necessary for a viable Palestinian state. International peace initiatives have largely disappeared, with the Trump administration's "Deal of the Century" representing an abandonment of even the pretense of Palestinian sovereignty in favor of normalizing permanent Israeli control. Palestinian society has faced intensifying pressures during this period. The Palestinian Authority, lacking democratic legitimacy after years without elections, has become increasingly authoritarian while continuing security coordination with Israel. Gaza has endured catastrophic humanitarian conditions, with economic collapse, environmental degradation, and periodic military assaults. Palestinian citizens of Israel have faced growing discrimination, exemplified by home demolitions in the Negev/Naqab and the 2021 violence in mixed cities. Across all areas, Palestinians confront a comprehensive system of control that regulates movement, residence, resource access, and political expression. The global discourse around the conflict has shifted significantly, with major human rights organizations including Amnesty International, Human Rights Watch, and B'Tselem formally concluding that Israel's policies constitute apartheid under international law. These assessments focus not on analogies to South Africa but on the legal definition of apartheid as a crime against humanity involving systematic oppression and domination by one racial group over another. This shift in framing has been accompanied by growing support for Palestinian rights among younger generations in Western countries and the expansion of the Boycott, Divestment, and Sanctions (BDS) movement despite legislative efforts to suppress it. The collapse of the two-state paradigm has prompted renewed examination of alternatives, particularly various forms of a single democratic state with equal rights for all inhabitants. Palestinian intellectual discourse has increasingly focused on liberation rather than statehood, emphasizing decolonization, the right of return for refugees, and dismantling structures of domination rather than merely ending occupation. This approach reconnects Palestinians across the fragmented geography imposed by decades of Israeli policies, challenging artificial distinctions between Palestinians in the occupied territories, inside Israel, and in the diaspora. Recent years have also witnessed moments of Palestinian unity and resistance that transcend geographic separation. The 2021 Unity Intifada/May Uprising saw synchronized protests across historic Palestine and the diaspora, breaking down the political and physical barriers that have long divided Palestinians. While these moments have not produced lasting political transformation, they demonstrate the persistent Palestinian refusal to accept permanent subjugation and the continued vitality of Palestinian national consciousness despite decades of efforts to fragment and suppress it.

Summary

The history of Palestine under occupation reveals a consistent pattern of territorial fragmentation, population control, and resistance that has evolved through multiple phases yet maintained certain core characteristics. What began as a settler-colonial project has transformed into a sophisticated system of apartheid characterized by differentiated legal regimes, physical separation, and resource domination. The occupation has not remained static but has continually adapted its methods—from direct military rule to bureaucratic control mechanisms, from overt land seizure to legal manipulation, from physical barriers to digital surveillance. Throughout this evolution, the fundamental dynamic remains unchanged: one group systematically dispossessing and dominating another while denying its national existence and rights. This history offers crucial lessons about power, resistance, and international complicity. It demonstrates how temporary "security measures" can evolve into permanent structures of control, how peace processes can be weaponized to expand rather than end occupation, and how international law becomes meaningless without enforcement mechanisms. It also reveals the remarkable resilience of communities under sustained oppression and their capacity to develop new forms of resistance when traditional avenues are blocked. For those seeking to understand or address similar conflicts, Palestine illustrates the necessity of addressing root causes rather than symptoms, the danger of normalizing what should remain unacceptable, and the moral imperative of centering the voices and rights of those living under occupation rather than the security concerns of those maintaining it. Only by recognizing the fundamental injustice at the heart of the conflict—the denial of Palestinian self-determination and equal rights—can any meaningful path toward a just peace emerge.

About Author

Loading...

Noam Chomsky

Avram Noam Chomsky is an American professor and public intellectual known for his work in linguistics, political activism, and social criticism. Sometimes called "the father of modern linguistics", Chomsky is also a major figure in analytic philosophy and one of the founders of the field of cognitive science. He is a laureate professor of linguistics at the University of Arizona and an institute professor emeritus at the Massachusetts Institute of Technology (MIT). Among the most cited living authors, Chomsky has written more than 150 books on topics such as linguistics, war, and politics. In addition to his work in linguistics, since the 1960s Chomsky has been an influential voice on the American left as a consistent critic of U.S. foreign policy, contemporary capitalism, and corporate influence on political institutions and the media.Born to Ashkenazi Jewish immigrants in Philadelphia, Chomsky developed an early interest in anarchism from alternative bookstores in New York City. He studied at the University of Pennsylvania. During his postgraduate work in the Harvard Society of Fellows, Chomsky developed the theory of transformational grammar for which he earned his doctorate in 1955. That year he began teaching at MIT, and in 1957 emerged as a significant figure in linguistics with his landmark work Syntactic Structures, which played a major role in remodeling the study of language. From 1958 to 1959 Chomsky was a National Science Foundation fellow at the Institute for Advanced Study. He created or co-created the universal grammar theory, the generative grammar theory, the Chomsky hierarchy, and the minimalist program. Chomsky also played a pivotal role in the decline of linguistic behaviorism, and was particularly critical of the work of B.F. Skinner.An outspoken opponent of U.S. involvement in the Vietnam War, which he saw as an act of American imperialism, in 1967 Chomsky rose to national attention for his anti-war essay "The Responsibility of Intellectuals". Becoming associated with the New Left, he was arrested multiple times for his activism and placed on President Richard M. Nixon's list of political opponents. While expanding his work in linguistics over subsequent decades, he also became involved in the linguistics wars. In collaboration with Edward S. Herman, Chomsky later articulated the propaganda model of media criticism in Manufacturing Consent, and worked to expose the Indonesian occupation of East Timor. His defense of unconditional freedom of speech, including that of Holocaust denial, generated significant controversy in the Faurisson affair of the 1980s. Chomsky's commentary on the Cambodian genocide and the Bosnian genocide also generated controversy. Since retiring from active teaching at MIT, he has continued his vocal political activism, including opposing the 2003 invasion of Iraq and supporting the Occupy movement. An anti-Zionist, Chomsky considers Israel's treatment of Palestinians to be worse than South African–style apartheid, and criticizes U.S. support for Israel.Chomsky is widely recognized as having helped to spark the cognitive revolution in the human sciences, contributing to the development of a new cognitivistic framework for the study of language and the mind. Chomsky remains a leading critic of U.S. foreign policy, contemporary capitalism, U.S. involvement and Israel's role in the Israeli–Palestinian conflict, and mass media. Chomsky and his ideas are highly influential in the anti-capitalist and anti-imperialist movements. Since 2017, he has been Agnese Helms Haury Chair in the Agnese Nelms Haury Program in Environment and Social Justice at the University of Arizona.

Read more

Related Books by Noam Chomsky

Loading...

Profit Over People

Noam Chomsky

Neoliberalism and Global Order

★★★★☆4.0

Loading...

Manufacturing Consent

Edward S. Herman

The Political Economy of the Mass Media

★★★★☆4.2

Loading...

Failed States

Noam Chomsky

The Abuse of Power and the Assault on Democracy

★★★½☆4.0

Loading...

Understanding Power

Noam Chomsky

The Indispensable Chomsky

★★★★☆4.4

Loading...

Who Rules the World?

Noam Chomsky

Explore the Hidden Powers That Govern Our World Today

★★★★☆4.0

Loading...

What Kind of Creatures Are We?

Noam Chomsky

A deep exploration of human nature, language, and consciousness

★★★½☆3.7