Open

Open Plot Summary

Introduction

In the ancient port of Alexandria, a remarkable institution once stood that embodied humanity's greatest aspirations. The Great Library collected knowledge from across the known world, housing scrolls written in dozens of languages by scholars of all backgrounds. This cosmopolitan center represented something profound about human progress - that societies flourish when they open themselves to diverse ideas, peoples, and exchanges. Yet within a few centuries, the library would be destroyed, its knowledge scattered, as Alexandria and the wider Roman world turned inward during an age of insecurity and fear. This pattern of openness followed by closure has repeated throughout human history. From the Islamic Golden Age to Renaissance Italy, from Tang Dynasty China to Enlightenment Europe, we see remarkable periods of progress when societies lower barriers to ideas, trade, and immigration - followed by reactionary backlashes when they raise them again. By examining these historical cycles, we gain crucial insights into the psychological and institutional forces that drive human progress or stagnation. Understanding this pattern helps us recognize the warning signs of closure in our own time and appreciate the fragile foundations upon which open societies rest.

Chapter 1: Ancient Exchanges: Trade Networks and Early Civilizations

When archaeologists discovered the 5,300-year-old body of Ötzi the Iceman preserved in Alpine ice, they found compelling evidence that global exchange is not a modern phenomenon. Though he died alone in the mountains, Ötzi carried items connecting him to vast networks: his copper axe contained metal mined 60 kilometers away, while his flint tools originated from three different regions. Even in death, this prehistoric man testified to humanity's fundamental nature as traders and exchangers. The earliest civilizations emerged not in isolation but through connection. Mesopotamia, often called the cradle of civilization, developed writing not for poetry or religious texts but for accounting - tracking goods moving through increasingly complex trade networks. Clay tablets from ancient Sumer record transactions by merchants like Kushim, who traded barley around 3000 BCE. These commercial exchanges created the foundation for specialized labor, allowing some people to become priests, scribes, and eventually scientists and philosophers instead of food producers. The Phoenicians revolutionized ancient commerce by establishing the first far-reaching maritime trade network. From their coastal cities in modern Lebanon, these master seafarers transported goods across the Mediterranean between 1500-300 BCE, connecting Egypt, Greece, Carthage and beyond. Their greatest export wasn't physical goods but their revolutionary alphabet - a simple system of 22 letters that replaced complex pictographic writing systems. The Greeks later adapted this alphabet and passed it to the Romans, forming the foundation of our modern writing system. Ancient Greece, despite philosophical ambivalence toward commerce, thrived through trade. Athens imported grain from Egypt and the Black Sea region while exporting olive oil, wine, and pottery. This economic foundation supported the cultural and intellectual flowering that gave us democracy, philosophy, and drama. The Athenian port of Piraeus became a cosmopolitan hub where ideas flowed as freely as goods, creating the conditions for innovation. The Roman Empire expanded this interconnected world to unprecedented scale. At its height, goods flowed across three continents through a sophisticated network of roads, shipping lanes, and market towns. When these networks collapsed with Rome's fall in the 5th century CE, Europe entered a period of economic and cultural regression. The archaeological record shows a dramatic decline in material culture - pottery became cruder, buildings smaller, and diets less varied. This demonstrates a crucial historical pattern: societies flourish when exchange networks expand and decline when they contract. This ancient pattern continues to shape our world today. Modern globalization represents the culmination of humanity's ancient impulse to trade and connect. What began with obsidian traveling 88 kilometers to prehistoric settlements has evolved into a world where goods, services, ideas, and people move across the planet at unprecedented speed, creating both remarkable prosperity and profound challenges.

Chapter 2: Golden Ages: When Cosmopolitan Societies Flourished (800-1300)

Between the 8th and 13th centuries, three remarkable civilizations flourished simultaneously across Eurasia, each characterized by unprecedented openness to outside influences. The Abbasid Caliphate, centered in Baghdad, created what historians call the Islamic Golden Age. The Tang and Song dynasties transformed China into the world's most advanced civilization. And in Europe, the recovery of classical learning sparked intellectual revival in cities like Toledo and Paris. Though separated by vast distances, these societies shared a common feature - they thrived by embracing diversity rather than fearing it. Baghdad under the Abbasids became history's greatest center of learning since Alexandria. The caliph al-Mamun established the House of Wisdom, where scholars translated Greek, Persian, and Indian texts into Arabic. Muslim polymaths like Ibn al-Haytham pioneered the experimental method in optics, while Ibn Sina (Avicenna) revolutionized medicine with his Canon, which remained standard in European universities for centuries. The mathematician al-Khwarizmi gave us the word "algorithm" and developed algebra as a mathematical system. This flourishing was made possible by the caliphate's relative religious tolerance and its position at the crossroads of trade routes, allowing ideas to flow from India, China, and the Byzantine Empire. China during the Tang dynasty (618-907) embraced foreign influences with remarkable enthusiasm. The capital Chang'an became the world's largest city, where Persian merchants, Indian Buddhist monks, and Arab traders mingled freely. The Tang court appointed foreigners to high positions - an Arab Muslim served as chief astronomer, while Turks commanded imperial armies. This cosmopolitanism continued under the Song dynasty (960-1279), which developed the world's most sophisticated economy. As historian Joel Mokyr notes, Song China came "as close to modernity as eighteenth century Europe" with its paper money, joint-stock companies, and mass production techniques. Chinese iron output nearly matched what all of Europe would produce in 1700. Medieval Spain exemplified how cultural exchange could drive innovation. Following the Islamic conquest of Iberia in 711, the region became a unique meeting point of Christian, Muslim, and Jewish cultures. In Toledo, scholars from these three traditions worked together translating Arabic texts into Latin, reintroducing lost classical knowledge to Europe. This "translation movement" recovered works by Aristotle, Euclid, Ptolemy, and Galen, along with commentaries by Muslim scholars. Without this cross-cultural exchange, the European Renaissance might never have happened. What made these golden ages possible was institutional openness. The Abbasid caliphs, Tang emperors, and enlightened Spanish rulers recognized that diversity created strength rather than weakness. They established legal protections for religious minorities, welcomed foreign merchants, and patronized scholars regardless of background. As historian Patricia Crone observed about the Islamic world: "When the political and religious authorities were at their strongest, tolerance was at its height." This contradicts the common assumption that diversity creates instability - historically, the most successful societies have been those that managed diversity most effectively. The tragic end of these golden ages reveals how fragile openness can be. The Mongol invasion of 1258 destroyed Baghdad, while China gradually turned inward following foreign threats. In Spain, the Reconquista eventually replaced pluralism with the Inquisition. These reversals remind us that progress is not inevitable - societies can and do regress when fear overcomes openness. The lesson for modern societies is clear: cosmopolitanism creates remarkable prosperity and innovation, but it requires constant defense against our tribal instincts.

Chapter 3: The Great Closing: Fear and Tradition Halt Progress (1300-1600)

The 14th century marked a dramatic turning point in world history - a "Great Closing" when societies across Eurasia retreated from the cosmopolitanism that had fueled previous golden ages. This reversal wasn't merely a political shift but a profound psychological and cultural reaction to unprecedented crises. The Black Death, which killed approximately one-third of Europe's population between 1347 and 1351, triggered deep trauma and insecurity. Climate change during the "Little Ice Age" caused crop failures and famines. Mongol invasions devastated Central Asia, China, and the Middle East. These catastrophes created fertile ground for movements promising security through tradition and purity. China's transformation from world leader to isolated kingdom exemplifies this pattern. The Ming dynasty, established in 1368 after expelling the Mongols, initially continued China's maritime traditions. Admiral Zheng He led massive fleets on seven voyages between 1405 and 1433, commanding ships that dwarfed European vessels. His flagship measured 135 meters - nearly seven times larger than Columbus' Santa Maria. Yet in 1433, the emperor suddenly canceled these expeditions, and three years later made building seagoing ships illegal. When some courtiers later revived the idea of maritime exploration, officials destroyed the records of previous voyages to prevent anyone from getting ideas. This dramatic reversal reflected a deeper ideological shift. Ming rulers portrayed themselves as restoring traditional Chinese values after the "contamination" of Mongol rule. Confucian scholars gained unprecedented influence, promoting an inward-looking worldview that emphasized stability over innovation. Foreign trade was restricted, then banned entirely. By 1500, Chinese subjects were no longer allowed to leave the country on pain of death. As historian Timothy Brook writes, "The Ming state was actively constructing a boundary between China and the rest of the world, not just politically but conceptually." A similar pattern unfolded in the Islamic world. The great efflorescence of Islamic science and philosophy began to fracture as the Abbasid Caliphate broke apart into feuding regions. Religious scholars like Al-Ghazali gained influence by arguing that Greek philosophy had led Muslims astray from true faith. Educational institutions became more conservative, with religious study replacing scientific inquiry. The final blow came with devastating invasions - first the Mongols, then Timur (Tamerlane). These disasters reinforced the conservative religious reaction, which claimed secular philosophy had led their culture astray. Europe experienced its own version of this closing, though with crucial differences. The Catholic Church responded to the trauma of the Black Death by intensifying persecution of heretics, Jews, and supposed witches. Communities searched for scapegoats, with Jews particularly targeted based on rumors they had poisoned wells. The Spanish Inquisition, established in 1478, sought to purify society by identifying and punishing converts suspected of secretly practicing Judaism or Islam. Following the fall of Granada in 1492, Ferdinand and Isabella gave Jews four months to convert to Christianity or leave Spain. Some 200,000 Jews converted and as many as 100,000 were expelled. What makes Europe's story different is that its political fragmentation prevented any single authority from imposing complete closure. When Spain expelled its Jews, many found refuge in more tolerant regions like the Ottoman Empire, the Netherlands, and Italy. When the Catholic Church banned certain books, they could still be published in Protestant territories. This "exit option" preserved spaces where new ideas could develop, setting the stage for Europe's eventual reopening during the Renaissance and Enlightenment. The Great Closing demonstrates how quickly progress can reverse when societies feel threatened. Fear triggers our tribal instincts, making us suspicious of difference and nostalgic for an imagined past of stability and purity. Understanding this pattern helps explain why periods of openness and innovation throughout history have often been followed by reactionary backlashes - a cycle that continues to shape our world today.

Chapter 4: Enlightenment's Republic: The Battle for Open Minds (1600-1800)

Between 1600 and 1800, Europe underwent a profound transformation that laid the foundations for the modern world. The Enlightenment represented not just an intellectual movement but a fundamental shift in how societies organized themselves and understood their place in the universe. This revolution began with the Scientific Revolution of the late 16th and 17th centuries, when figures like Copernicus, Galileo, and Newton challenged both ancient authorities and religious dogma by insisting on mathematical proof and experimental verification. Their discoveries undermined the medieval worldview, suggesting a universe governed by natural laws rather than divine intervention. What made this intellectual revolution possible was the emergence of a remarkable institution known as the "Republic of Letters" - an informal network of philosophers, scientists, and writers who exchanged ideas through correspondence across national and religious boundaries. As French philosopher Pierre Bayle explained, "This commonwealth is a State extremely Free. The Empire of Truth and Reason is only acknowledged in it... Friends ought to be on their Guard, there, against their Friends, Fathers against Children... Every body, there, is both Sovereign and under every-body's Jurisdiction." Evidence and logic were the only authorities that mattered in this virtual republic. Europe's political fragmentation proved crucial to this intellectual flowering. Unlike China or the Ottoman Empire, where a single authority could suppress dangerous ideas, Europe was divided into hundreds of competing jurisdictions. When thinkers faced persecution in one territory, they could flee to another. Hobbes wrote Leviathan while exiled in Paris, and Locke wrote his major works as a refugee in Amsterdam. The Dutch natural law thinker Hugo Grotius escaped from the Netherlands to Paris, while the French philosopher Descartes moved in the opposite direction for the same reason. Even when thinkers didn't cross borders, their books did - printing houses all over Europe made it impossible to keep any book away from readers for long. The Enlightenment expanded scientific principles beyond natural philosophy to social and political questions. John Locke challenged divine right monarchy by arguing that political authority derived from the consent of the governed. Montesquieu analyzed how separation of powers could prevent tyranny. Voltaire advocated for religious tolerance, while Adam Smith demonstrated how free markets could harness self-interest for the common good. These ideas spread through an expanding public sphere of coffee houses, salons, newspapers, and an explosion of print media, creating spaces where authority could be questioned and new ideas debated. This intellectual ferment had profound practical consequences. The American Revolution explicitly drew on Enlightenment principles, creating a constitutional republic based on natural rights and popular sovereignty. The Declaration of Independence reads like an executive summary of Locke's political philosophy, while the Constitution established checks and balances inspired by Montesquieu. The French Revolution, despite its later descent into terror, began with similar aspirations to create a rational political order based on liberty, equality, and fraternity. Even monarchs felt the Enlightenment's influence, with "enlightened despots" like Frederick the Great of Prussia and Catherine the Great of Russia implementing reforms inspired by philosophical principles. The Enlightenment's most enduring legacy was establishing that ideas should be judged on their merits rather than their source. By creating a culture where critical thinking replaced deference to authority, the Republic of Letters set in motion an intellectual revolution that continues to this day. As Immanuel Kant defined it in 1784, enlightenment meant "mankind's exit from its self-incurred immaturity" - the courage to use one's own understanding without direction from another. This intellectual openness would prove essential for the economic revolution that followed, as the free exchange of ideas fueled the innovations of the Industrial Revolution.

Chapter 5: Industrial Revolution: Open Societies Outpace Closed Systems

In the late 18th century, something unprecedented occurred in a small corner of northwestern Europe. For the first time in human history, economic growth didn't peter out after a brief efflorescence but continued accelerating. This was the Industrial Revolution - the moment when humanity escaped the Malthusian trap that had constrained living standards since the dawn of civilization. Between 1760 and 1860, Britain's manufacturing output increased roughly tenfold while its population merely doubled. By 1900, the average Briton was three times wealthier than in 1700. This transformation would eventually spread globally, creating the modern world of abundance we now inhabit. Britain's economic miracle began with a political revolution. The Glorious Revolution of 1688 established constitutional monarchy and rule of law, creating what economists Daron Acemoglu and James Robinson call "the world's first set of inclusive political institutions." Property rights were protected, arbitrary taxation ended, and monopolies were gradually dismantled. These changes weren't designed to create economic growth - they were compromises forced by political necessity - but they had profound unintended consequences. As historian Joel Mokyr explains: "The British state that emerged after 1688 was not designed to be growth-promoting, but it turned out that way." This new institutional environment created unprecedented economic freedom. Unlike continental Europe, where guilds and royal monopolies restricted competition, Britain allowed greater space for entrepreneurs and innovators. The patent system was reformed to better protect intellectual property while making technical information public. Banks channeled capital to promising ventures, while joint-stock companies allowed investors to pool resources for large projects. Internal tariffs were abolished, creating a unified national market. These changes created what economic historian Deirdre McCloskey calls "a new respect for ordinary business and innovation" - a cultural shift as important as any technological breakthrough. Britain's doors were also thrown open to talent from abroad. When France revoked religious freedoms in 1685, thousands of skilled Huguenot craftsmen fled to Britain, bringing expertise in clock-making, instrument design, and fine mechanics. Jewish financiers helped London overtake Amsterdam as the world's financial center. As Voltaire observed while visiting London in the 1720s: "Go into the London Stock Exchange - a more respectable place than many a court - and you will see representatives from all nations gathered together for the utility of men." This openness to foreign talent and ideas gave Britain crucial advantages in emerging industries. The United States took this model of openness even further. The Constitution created a federal system with checks and balances to prevent the concentration of power, while the Bill of Rights protected individual liberties. A unified national market without internal tariffs allowed goods and people to move freely. The patent system was deliberately designed to be more accessible than its European counterparts, with fees just 5% of British levels. This democratization of invention allowed people from humble backgrounds to become innovators. As Abraham Lincoln - himself a patent holder - observed, "The patent system added the fuel of interest to the fire of genius." The contrast with closed systems became increasingly stark throughout the 19th century. While Britain and America industrialized rapidly, the Ottoman Empire and Qing China stagnated under rigid hierarchies and resistance to foreign ideas. When the Ottoman sultan finally established a printing press in 1727 - nearly three centuries after Gutenberg - religious authorities restricted what could be published. China's examination system rewarded mastery of ancient classics rather than scientific or technical knowledge. By 1900, these once-mighty empires had become vulnerable to Western imperialism, demonstrating how economic openness translated directly into geopolitical power. The Industrial Revolution reveals a profound historical truth: societies that remain open to new ideas, people, and exchanges consistently outperform those that turn inward. This pattern continues to shape our world today, as nations that embrace globalization and innovation generally prosper while those that resist change fall behind. The lesson is clear - openness isn't just a moral value but a practical necessity for societies that wish to thrive in a competitive world.

Chapter 6: Modern Tensions: Globalization's Promise and Populist Backlash

The collapse of the Soviet Union in 1991 marked what appeared to be the final triumph of open societies over closed systems. As the Cold War ended, a wave of democratization swept across Eastern Europe, Latin America, and parts of Asia. Trade barriers fell, capital flowed freely across borders, and the internet connected humanity as never before. This period of accelerated globalization produced remarkable results: between 1990 and 2015, global hunger declined by 40%, and levels of illiteracy and child mortality fell by half. Despite population growth of two billion people during this period, the number of people living in extreme poverty declined by an average of 130,000 every day. Yet this era of openness has faced mounting challenges in recent years. The 2008 financial crisis undermined faith in economic experts and institutions. The European migration crisis of 2015-16 triggered fears about cultural identity and social cohesion. Rising inequality within developed nations created perceptions that globalization benefits elites at the expense of ordinary citizens. These concerns have fueled populist movements promising to protect "the people" against both foreign threats and cosmopolitan elites. From Brexit to the election of Donald Trump, from Viktor Orbán in Hungary to Jair Bolsonaro in Brazil, populist leaders have gained power by promising to restore national sovereignty and traditional values. This backlash against openness reflects deep psychological tensions that have shaped human history. We are not just traders but also tribalists. We cooperate, but often to defeat others. One attribute lets us find positive-sum games where exchange is mutually beneficial; the other primes us to be wary of zero-sum games where we think others can only benefit at our expense. When we feel threatened - by pandemics, immigrants, foreign countries, or "treacherous elites" - we want to escape into the security of our tribe and circle the wagons. The COVID-19 pandemic illustrates these tensions perfectly. International travel and trade allowed the virus to spread globally with unprecedented speed, prompting calls for greater isolation and self-sufficiency. Yet globalization also provided our best defense - wealth, communication technology, and open science made our response faster than ever before. When China announced a new coronavirus on January 2, 2020, Chinese scientists read its complete genome and published it on January 10. Just six days later, German researchers had developed a diagnostic test, and within three months, hundreds of potential drugs and vaccines were being developed globally. This scientific cooperation across borders represents humanity at its best. The challenge for modern societies is managing the pace of change without sacrificing the benefits of openness. Rapid technological transformation and economic integration have disrupted communities and traditional ways of life. As economist Dani Rodrik argues, "When markets expand beyond the regulatory reach of the nation-state, the resulting arrangements are neither efficient nor legitimate." Finding the right balance between national autonomy and international integration represents one of the great challenges of our time. Countries that close themselves off entirely will stagnate, but those that ignore the social consequences of rapid change risk populist backlashes. History suggests that open societies survive when they address legitimate grievances while maintaining core principles. The Progressive Era reforms of early 20th century America responded to the excesses of industrialization without abandoning market economics. The post-World War II welfare states of Western Europe provided security without sacrificing freedom. Today's challenges require similar creativity - finding ways to spread the benefits of globalization more widely, protect communities from excessive disruption, and maintain democratic legitimacy in an interconnected world. The historical pattern is clear: societies flourish when they remain open to ideas, trade, and immigration while providing the security and stability that allow citizens to embrace change rather than fear it.

Summary

Throughout history, human progress has followed a cyclical pattern of openness and closure. When societies lower barriers to ideas, trade, and immigration, they experience extraordinary bursts of creativity and prosperity. These "efflorescences" occurred in ancient Athens, Song Dynasty China, the Islamic Golden Age, Renaissance Italy, and Enlightenment Europe. The Industrial Revolution represented the first time such an efflorescence didn't peter out but continued accelerating, creating the modern world of abundance we now inhabit. Yet this progress remains fragile because it runs counter to some of our deepest psychological tendencies. Humans evolved as tribal creatures with strong ingroup preferences and suspicion of outsiders. During times of uncertainty or perceived threat, we instinctively retreat into tribalism, zero-sum thinking, and authoritarian responses. This explains why periods of openness throughout history have often been followed by reactionary backlashes - from Ming China's rejection of maritime exploration to the rise of fascism after the Great Depression. Understanding these cycles helps us recognize warning signs in our own time and appreciate that progress requires constant vigilance against our tribal instincts. The key lesson from history is clear: societies flourish when they remain open to new ideas, peoples, and exchanges while providing the security and stability that allow citizens to embrace change rather than fear it. Our future depends on maintaining this delicate balance between openness and belonging, between innovation and security.

About Author

Loading...

Johan Norberg

Read more