Our Wild Calling

Our Wild Calling Plot Summary

Introduction

When a wolf howls in the forest, it's not just making noise—it's speaking. The howl might be telling pack members about its location, warning of danger, or even expressing emotions like loneliness or joy. All around us, animals are constantly communicating in languages we're only beginning to understand. From the complex dance of honeybees to the infrasonic rumbles of elephants that travel for miles through the ground, the natural world buzzes with conversations happening just beyond human perception. This hidden world of animal communication represents one of science's most fascinating frontiers. Recent research has revealed that many species possess communication systems far more sophisticated than we previously imagined. Prairie dogs use what resembles grammar in their alarm calls, specifying not just that a predator is present but its size, color, and speed. Dolphins address each other with signature whistles that function like names. Even seemingly simple creatures like cuttlefish communicate through rapid changes in skin patterns, creating a visual language of remarkable complexity. By exploring these diverse communication systems, we gain not only a deeper appreciation for animal intelligence but also new insights into the evolution of our own language and the possibilities for meaningful connection across species boundaries.

Chapter 1: The Emotional Lives of Animals: Beyond Instinct

For centuries, scientists avoided attributing emotions to animals, dismissing apparent displays of joy, grief, or empathy as mere anthropomorphism—the tendency to project human qualities onto non-human entities. This perspective stemmed partly from behaviorist traditions that viewed animals as stimulus-response machines driven purely by instinct. However, a revolution has occurred in animal cognition research, revealing emotional lives far richer than previously acknowledged. Neurobiological studies show that mammals share the same basic brain structures responsible for emotions in humans. The amygdala, which processes fear and aggression, and the nucleus accumbens, associated with pleasure and reward, function similarly across species. When a dog wags its tail vigorously upon seeing its owner, it's experiencing neurochemical changes remarkably similar to what happens in a human brain during joyful reunions. This doesn't mean animal emotions are identical to human emotions—they lack the linguistic and cultural frameworks that shape human emotional experience—but the core neurological foundations are remarkably conserved across species. Evidence for complex emotions in animals continues to mount. Elephants perform mourning rituals, returning to the bones of deceased family members for years. Rats will forgo chocolate treats to help another rat in distress, demonstrating what appears to be empathy. Corvids like ravens and crows engage in reconciliation behaviors after conflicts, suggesting they maintain emotional awareness of social relationships. Even farm animals like pigs show optimistic or pessimistic cognitive biases depending on their living conditions, indicating emotional states influence their perception similar to humans experiencing depression or contentment. These emotional capacities aren't limited to mammals with large brains. Birds, despite having very different brain structures from mammals, demonstrate remarkable emotional complexity. Mated pairs of many bird species engage in behaviors that strengthen their bond, from mutual grooming to synchronized movements that resemble dancing. When separated, they show physiological stress responses and behavioral changes consistent with what we might call "missing" their partner. The neurotransmitters and hormones involved—dopamine, oxytocin, vasopressin—are the same ones that mediate attachment in humans. Understanding animal emotions matters beyond scientific curiosity. It has profound implications for animal welfare, conservation, and our ethical responsibilities toward other species. If animals experience joy, fear, grief, and attachment, then their subjective experiences deserve moral consideration. This doesn't mean treating animals exactly like humans, but rather acknowledging that their emotional lives give them interests that should factor into our decisions about how we interact with them. From livestock farming practices to wildlife management policies, recognizing animal emotions challenges us to reconsider systems designed with the assumption that animals are unfeeling automatons. The study of animal emotions also offers insights into our own emotional evolution. Rather than emotions being uniquely human traits that somehow emerged fully formed, they appear to be ancient adaptations that helped our ancestors—and help other animals today—navigate complex social environments and respond appropriately to opportunities and threats. By understanding the emotional lives of other species, we gain perspective on our own emotional nature and the biological foundations that shape our subjective experiences of the world.

Chapter 2: Communication Systems Across Species

Animal communication extends far beyond the vocalizations we can easily hear. Scientists have discovered that the animal kingdom employs a vast array of communication channels—chemical, tactile, visual, electrical, and acoustic—many operating outside human sensory perception. Elephants produce infrasonic rumbles that travel through the ground for miles, allowing separated herds to coordinate movements without seeing each other. Bees perform intricate "waggle dances" that convey precise information about the direction, distance, and quality of food sources to their hivemates. The complexity of these communication systems continues to surprise researchers. Prairie dogs use what linguists would recognize as syntax in their alarm calls, specifying not just that a predator is present but its size, shape, color, and direction of movement. When researchers played back recorded prairie dog calls while showing them different colored shirts, the animals created distinct calls for each color. This suggests they're not merely signaling "danger" but conveying specific information about what they observe—a fundamental aspect of true language. Aquatic environments host particularly sophisticated communication systems. Dolphins address each other with signature whistles that function essentially as names, and they can remember these individual identifiers for decades. Whales sing complex songs that evolve over time, with innovations spreading across populations in patterns that resemble cultural transmission. Even fish communicate through sound production, color changes, and body postures in ways we're only beginning to decode. The underwater world is far from silent—it's filled with conversations we've only recently developed the technology to detect. What makes these communication systems particularly fascinating is their efficiency and specificity. Unlike human language, which can be ambiguous, animal signals typically convey precise information relevant to survival. When a vervet monkey spots a leopard, it gives a distinct alarm call that sends other monkeys scrambling up trees. A different call for an eagle sends them diving into bushes. This specificity suggests that many animals have mental representations of their world that are more sophisticated than we once believed—they're not just reacting to stimuli but categorizing and communicating about them. Interspecies communication occurs naturally in the wild. Birds and mammals often respond to each other's alarm calls, creating a network of information about potential dangers. Honeyguide birds lead humans to beehives, benefiting from the humans' ability to access the honey while leaving wax for the birds. These examples suggest that different species can develop shared communication systems when there's mutual benefit. This natural tendency for cross-species communication offers hope that humans might develop more sophisticated ways to communicate with other animals as we better understand their natural signaling systems. The study of animal communication challenges our assumptions about human uniqueness. While human language certainly has unique properties—particularly its generative grammar and symbolic nature—the gap between human and animal communication appears less absolute than previously thought. By studying how other species convey information, form social bonds, and coordinate group activities through their communication systems, we gain insights into the evolutionary foundations of our own language and the diverse ways intelligence can manifest across the animal kingdom.

Chapter 3: Co-Evolution: How Humans and Animals Shape Each Other

The relationship between humans and animals is not a one-way street but a process of mutual transformation that biologists call co-evolution. When two species interact closely over evolutionary time, they exert selective pressures on each other, driving genetic and behavioral changes in both parties. This dynamic has profoundly shaped both human evolution and the development of numerous animal species, creating interdependencies that continue to influence our shared existence. The most dramatic example of human-animal co-evolution involves dogs, who evolved from wolves beginning at least 15,000 years ago. Recent research suggests this process may have begun not with intentional domestication but through natural selection favoring less fearful wolves that could benefit from human food waste. These bolder wolves gradually developed traits humans found useful—trainability, reduced aggression, and heightened sensitivity to human social cues. Meanwhile, human societies with canine partners gained advantages in hunting, protection, and eventually herding and agriculture. The relationship transformed both species: humans developed cultures that incorporated dogs in crucial roles, while dogs evolved unprecedented abilities to read human gestures and emotions. This co-evolutionary process didn't stop with dogs. As humans transitioned from hunter-gatherers to agriculturalists, they developed new relationships with goats, sheep, cattle, and other animals. These weren't merely one-sided relationships where humans dominated animals. Instead, these species effectively "domesticated" humans as well, changing our settlement patterns, diets, and even our genetic makeup. The ability to digest lactose into adulthood evolved in human populations that kept dairy animals—a clear example of how animal relationships shaped human biology. Co-evolution continues in the modern world, though often in less positive ways. Urban wildlife like raccoons, coyotes, and pigeons are rapidly adapting to human-dominated environments, developing new behaviors to exploit our resources and avoid our threats. Raccoons in cities show enhanced problem-solving abilities compared to their rural counterparts, while urban birds sing at higher pitches to be heard above traffic noise. These adaptations represent evolution in action—animals responding to the selective pressures we create through urbanization and habitat modification. Perhaps most fascinating is how animals have shaped human psychological and cultural evolution. Anthropologists argue that observing animal behavior helped early humans develop theory of mind—the ability to understand that others have different thoughts and perspectives than our own. By watching how animals responded to their environments and to each other, humans gained insights into intention, strategy, and social dynamics that proved valuable in their own communities. Animals feature prominently in our earliest art, religious symbolism, and language, suggesting they played crucial roles in the development of human consciousness and culture. Understanding co-evolution challenges us to reconsider our relationship with other species. Rather than seeing ourselves as separate from or superior to animals, this perspective emphasizes our fundamental interconnectedness. The traits we consider uniquely human—from our digestive systems to aspects of our cognition—evolved in the context of our relationships with other species. Recognizing this shared evolutionary history can inform more sustainable and ethical approaches to animal relationships, acknowledging that our wellbeing remains intertwined with that of our non-human neighbors.

Chapter 4: The Habitat of the Heart: Deep Interspecies Connections

Beyond the practical relationships humans form with animals for food, protection, or companionship lies something more profound—what some researchers call "the habitat of the heart." This term describes the emotional and psychological space where humans and animals meet as sentient beings, forming connections that transcend utilitarian purposes. These deep interspecies bonds appear to satisfy fundamental human needs for connection with the more-than-human world and can transform both parties in unexpected ways. The neurobiological foundations of these connections are increasingly well-understood. When humans and dogs gaze into each other's eyes, both species experience increases in oxytocin—the same hormone released during bonding between human mothers and infants. Similar physiological synchronization occurs between humans and horses during positive interactions, with heart rates aligning and stress hormones decreasing in both species. These biological responses suggest that interspecies connections aren't merely sentimental projections but involve genuine communication through shared emotional systems that evolved over millions of years of coexistence. These deep connections often occur in what anthropologists call "liminal space"—a threshold where usual boundaries dissolve. Think of the quiet moment when a wild bird lands near you and you both acknowledge each other's presence, or when your dog gazes into your eyes with apparent understanding. These experiences can feel almost mystical, creating a sense that time has slowed or even stopped. Neuroscientists suggest such encounters may activate the brain's default mode network, associated with self-reflection and perspective-taking, while temporarily quieting the task-oriented networks that dominate our everyday consciousness. For many people, these interspecies connections provide a unique form of emotional nourishment that human relationships alone cannot satisfy. They offer unconditional positive regard without the complex expectations and judgments that characterize human interactions. Animals respond to us as we are in the present moment, without concern for our social status, appearance, or past mistakes. This quality makes animal relationships particularly valuable for people who have experienced trauma, social rejection, or who struggle with conventional social interactions, including many individuals with autism spectrum conditions. The capacity for forming these deep connections varies among both humans and animals. Some people seem naturally attuned to animal behavior and emotions, while others must consciously develop this sensitivity. Similarly, certain animal species—particularly social mammals like dogs, horses, and dolphins—appear especially receptive to human connection. This receptivity isn't merely about intelligence but involves emotional intelligence and what biologists call "theory of mind"—the ability to recognize that others have different perspectives and mental states from one's own. Understanding the habitat of the heart challenges conventional Western distinctions between humans and animals. It suggests that meaningful communication and emotional connection can occur across species boundaries despite profound differences in perception and cognition. When we recognize animals as sentient beings capable of forming relationships with us, we move beyond seeing them as either resources to be used or wild creatures to be left alone. Instead, we enter the possibility of genuine relationship—a mutual recognition that can enrich both human and animal lives while fostering greater respect for our shared existence on this planet.

Chapter 5: Animal-Assisted Healing and Therapy

The healing power of animal relationships has moved from anecdotal observation to evidence-based practice in recent decades. Animal-assisted therapy (AAT) now encompasses a range of structured interventions where animals participate as integral parts of treatment plans for physical, cognitive, and psychological conditions. The scientific literature increasingly validates what many have intuitively understood: meaningful interaction with animals can catalyze healing in ways that complement conventional medical approaches. For children with autism spectrum disorders, animal interactions often provide unique therapeutic benefits. Many children who struggle with human social cues find animal communication more straightforward and less overwhelming. Horses, with their heightened sensitivity to non-verbal signals, have proven especially effective in helping these children develop communication skills and emotional regulation. In equine therapy sessions, children learn to modulate their movements and energy to successfully interact with the horse, gaining insights about non-verbal communication that transfer to human relationships. Similarly, programs pairing children with autism with specially trained dogs have documented improvements in social engagement, reduced anxiety, and increased independence in daily activities. Veterans coping with post-traumatic stress disorder represent another group benefiting significantly from animal relationships. Service dogs trained to respond to anxiety symptoms can interrupt panic attacks, provide calming pressure during stressful situations, and create a sense of safety that allows veterans to reengage with public spaces. The consistent, non-judgmental presence of an animal companion helps counter the hypervigilance and social isolation that often accompany PTSD. Some programs even pair veterans with shelter dogs, creating mutual rehabilitation opportunities as both human and animal recover from traumatic experiences. What makes animal-assisted approaches uniquely effective is their ability to bypass cognitive defenses and connect directly with emotional and sensory processing systems. When words fail or intellectual understanding proves insufficient, the embodied experience of animal connection can reach people in profound ways. This explains why animal relationships sometimes succeed where conventional therapies have stalled, particularly for individuals with developmental differences, trauma histories, or conditions affecting verbal communication. The therapeutic value of animals extends beyond formal clinical settings into everyday life. Studies show that regular positive interactions with animals—whether pets or wildlife—can reduce stress hormones, increase oxytocin production, and improve cardiovascular health markers. For elderly individuals, animal companionship helps combat loneliness and provides structure and purpose that contribute to cognitive health. Even brief encounters with animals in natural settings can produce measurable improvements in attention, mood, and cognitive function through what researchers call "attention restoration"—the relief from mental fatigue that occurs when we engage with non-demanding natural stimuli. As the field of animal-assisted interventions matures, practitioners are developing more sophisticated understandings of which animals are appropriate for different therapeutic contexts and how to ensure ethical treatment of the animals involved. The most effective programs recognize that therapy animals aren't simply tools for human healing but sentient participants whose wellbeing must be prioritized. This reciprocal approach acknowledges that therapeutic benefits emerge from genuine relationship rather than exploitation, pointing toward a model of healing that honors the agency and needs of both human and animal participants.

Chapter 6: Urban Wildlife: Adapting to Human Environments

A remarkable phenomenon is unfolding in cities worldwide: the emergence of "synanthropic" species—wild animals adapting to urban environments in ways that blur traditional boundaries between wild and domestic. These urban adapters—coyotes in Chicago, leopards in Mumbai, raccoons in Toronto—are neither fully wild nor tame, but exist in a new ecological niche created by human development. They represent evolution in action, responding to the selective pressures of city life with remarkable behavioral flexibility and intelligence. Urban ecologists have documented fascinating changes in these animals. City-dwelling coyotes have become more nocturnal to avoid human contact, while urban raccoons have developed enhanced problem-solving abilities to access human food sources. Some species show physical adaptations as well—urban birds sing at higher pitches to be heard above traffic noise, and certain mammals display larger brain-to-body ratios compared to their rural counterparts. These adaptations reflect not just survival strategies but new forms of intelligence emerging in response to human-dominated landscapes. The communication strategies of urban wildlife are particularly intriguing. Many species have modified their natural communication systems to function in noisy, fragmented urban environments. Urban birds adjust not only the pitch but also the timing of their songs, singing earlier in the morning before human activity peaks. Coyotes in cities rely more on scent marking and less on howling compared to their rural counterparts. These changes represent sophisticated adaptations to the unique acoustic and social environment of cities, demonstrating these animals' remarkable ability to modify their communication in response to human presence. The relationship between humans and urban wildlife is complex and often contradictory. Many urbanites experience both fascination and fear when encountering wildlife in settings previously considered exclusively human domain. A fox trotting down a city sidewalk or a hawk nesting on a skyscraper ledge can trigger a sense of wonder, but also anxiety about potential conflicts. Wildlife management professionals find themselves navigating these contradictory public attitudes while developing strategies for coexistence that protect both human and animal interests. Cities are increasingly recognizing the value of urban wildlife and implementing design features to accommodate animal movement. Wildlife corridors, green roofs, and water features can create habitat connectivity, allowing animals to traverse urban landscapes safely. Some innovative cities have installed wildlife overpasses or underpasses to reduce road mortality, while others have modified building codes to prevent bird collisions with glass facades. These efforts reflect a growing understanding that biodiversity contributes to urban resilience and quality of life for human residents. The presence of wildlife in cities offers unique opportunities for communication and connection. Urban residents who observe the same raccoon family over multiple seasons or recognize individual crows in their neighborhood develop relationships that differ from traditional pet ownership or wildlife viewing. These encounters can foster what ecologists call "ecological citizenship"—a sense of belonging to a more-than-human community and responsibility toward other species sharing our urban spaces. As cities continue to expand globally, how we communicate with and accommodate these adaptive wild neighbors will shape the future of human-animal relationships in an increasingly urbanized world.

Chapter 7: Building Reciprocal Relationships with Animals

True relationships require mutual benefit, not just one-sided gain. For centuries, humans have often taken from animals with little consideration for what we might offer in return. A new paradigm is emerging that emphasizes reciprocity—the idea that humans can and should provide benefits to other species, not just extract value from them. This approach recognizes that healthy ecosystems depend on balanced relationships among all inhabitants, including humans. Reciprocity begins with observation and understanding. By carefully studying how animals interact with their environments and with each other, we can identify ways to support their needs while meeting our own. For example, farmers practicing regenerative agriculture work with natural predator-prey relationships to control pests rather than using chemicals that disrupt entire food webs. Urban planners design wildlife corridors that allow animals to move safely through developed areas, maintaining genetic diversity and access to resources. These approaches recognize animals as participants in shared systems rather than obstacles to human progress. Communication forms the foundation of reciprocal relationships. While we cannot speak directly with other species, we can learn to recognize and respect their communication signals. For instance, understanding that a dog's yawn often indicates stress rather than tiredness allows us to respond appropriately to their emotional state. Recognizing that birds singing near our homes aren't just providing pleasant background noise but engaging in crucial territory and mate attraction behaviors might motivate us to reduce unnecessary noise during breeding season. This attentiveness to animal communication represents a form of respect that acknowledges their agency and interests. Indigenous knowledge systems often emphasize reciprocal relationships with animals. Many traditional hunting practices include rituals of gratitude and specific methods to ensure animal populations remain healthy. These approaches recognize that humans are participants in, not masters of, ecological systems. When something is taken, something must be given back—whether through direct action like habitat restoration or through restraint by limiting harvest to sustainable levels. While modern societies cannot simply adopt indigenous practices wholesale, we can learn from their emphasis on relationship rather than domination. Modern conservation increasingly incorporates principles of reciprocity. Community-based conservation programs provide economic benefits to local people in exchange for wildlife protection. Wildlife tourism, when properly managed, creates incentives to maintain healthy animal populations and habitats. Even citizen science projects offer a form of reciprocity—animals "provide" data and inspiration to humans, who in turn contribute to knowledge that supports conservation. These approaches recognize that sustainable relationships must benefit all parties involved. On an individual level, reciprocity might involve creating wildlife-friendly spaces in yards and communities, supporting conservation organizations, or making lifestyle choices that reduce negative impacts on animal habitats. It might mean choosing to observe wildlife respectfully rather than disturbing them for perfect photographs, or learning to coexist with the spiders in our homes rather than automatically reaching for insecticide. These small acts acknowledge that our wellbeing is intertwined with that of other species and that we have responsibilities toward them that extend beyond mere preservation. Building reciprocal relationships with animals requires moving beyond both exploitation and sentimental preservation toward genuine partnership. It means recognizing animals not as resources to be used or pristine creatures to be admired from afar, but as fellow travelers on an evolutionary journey—beings with their own perspectives, interests, and contributions to our shared world. This shift in perspective offers a path toward more sustainable and fulfilling relationships with the diverse species that make our planet the extraordinary living system it is.

Summary

The exploration of animal communication reveals a world far more complex and interconnected than previously imagined. From the sophisticated alarm calls of prairie dogs to the infrasonic rumbles of elephants, animals are constantly communicating in ways that challenge our assumptions about language and intelligence. These communication systems aren't merely simplified versions of human language but specialized adaptations perfectly suited to each species' ecological niche and social needs. By learning to recognize and respect these diverse forms of expression, we gain not only scientific insights but also opportunities for meaningful connection across species boundaries. What might our world look like if we approached animal relationships through the lens of reciprocity rather than dominance? How would our cities, farms, and conservation efforts change if we prioritized communication and mutual benefit with other species? These questions invite us to reimagine our place in the natural world not as separate masters but as participants in a complex web of relationships. Whether you're fascinated by wildlife behavior, concerned about conservation, or simply curious about the non-human minds all around us, the study of animal communication offers a window into a conversation that has been ongoing for millions of years—one we're only beginning to understand and join.

About Author

Loading...

Richard Louv

Richard Louv, recipient of the 2008 Audubon Medal, is the author of seven books, including Last Child in the Woods and The Nature Principle. The chairman of the Children & Nature Network (www.cnaturenet.org), he is also honorary co-chair of the National Forum on Children and Nature. He has written for the San Diego Union-Tribune, the New York Times, the Washington Post, the Christian Science Monitor, and other newspapers and magazines. He has appeared on The Early Show, Good Morning America, Today, CBS Evening News, NBC Nightly News, NPRs Morning Edition, Fresh Air, Talk of the Nation, and many other programs. For more information, visit www.lastchildinthewoods.com.

Read more