Paid Attention

Paid Attention Plot Summary

Introduction

In today's media-saturated landscape, attention has become the most precious and scarce resource. As content proliferates exponentially across digital platforms, brands and marketers face unprecedented challenges in capturing and maintaining consumer attention. The traditional models of advertising—built on interruption and message transmission—are rapidly becoming obsolete as consumers gain more control over their media environments. This theoretical framework reconceptualizes how brands should operate in the evolving attention economy. Moving beyond outdated advertising paradigms, it examines how the nature of communication itself is changing, how consumer behavior is driven by forces below the threshold of consciousness, and how brands can create meaningful value in a world of infinite content. The core innovation lies in understanding that attention can no longer simply be bought—it must be earned through behavior, utility, and genuine engagement. Through this lens, we can develop new strategies for communication that respect the changing dynamics between brands and people in the digital age.

Chapter 1: The Brand as Myth: Social Construction of Value

Brands exist in a conceptual space that transcends their physical products or services. They function as modern myths in our society, filling the meaning-making void left by traditional cultural narratives. This mythical quality explains why the definition of "brand" remains elusive despite its ubiquity—brands are inherently complex, polysemous entities that resist simple characterization. At their core, brands are socially constructed ideas. While we often think of brands as collections of perceptions in individual minds, they are more accurately understood as collective perceptions—shared cultural understandings that gain objective reality through social agreement. Similar to how money has value not because of its physical properties but because we collectively agree it does, brands exist because enough people believe in their meaning and value. This collective nature is what allows brands to function as social currency and identity markers. The financial value attributed to brands stems from their ability to create persistent "irrational" behaviors in consumers. When people willingly pay premium prices for functionally equivalent products, or develop fierce loyalties to particular brands, we witness the economic power of these socially constructed ideas. Brands create price inelasticity of demand—the ability to charge more without significantly affecting sales—which translates directly to bottom-line value for companies. The most powerful brands resolve contradictions or tensions in culture and identity. Apple makes technology human. Nike makes everyone an athlete. Google makes infinity manageable. These brands, like traditional myths, provide meta-narratives that help people navigate contradictory aspects of modern life. They offer symbolic solutions to problems that cannot be solved rationally, creating emotional connections that transcend functional benefits. Understanding brands as myths explains why the most successful ones embrace complexity rather than reducing themselves to single attributes. They consist of interconnected elements—what we might call "brandemes"—that together form a cohesive yet flexible system of meaning. A brand like Coca-Cola encompasses redness, happiness, sharing, nostalgia, and countless other associations that can be emphasized differently across contexts while maintaining its essential character. The mythic function of brands also explains why traditional market research often fails to capture their true power. Since myths operate largely below conscious awareness, consumers cannot always articulate why they feel connected to certain brands. The influence happens through associations, emotions, and cultural context rather than rational message processing—making brands simultaneously difficult to create and remarkably durable when established.

Chapter 2: Attention Economics: Why Research Often Fails

The drivers of human behavior are complex, multivariate, and largely subconscious, creating fundamental challenges for traditional market research. The epistemological foundation of most research—that people can accurately report why they do what they do—is fundamentally flawed. We make decisions through processes that are inaccessible to our conscious minds, yet when asked, we confidently provide explanations that seem plausible but are often entirely fabricated. This gap between actual behavior and reported motivation creates serious problems for marketing research. Focus groups and surveys capture what people think they think, or what they believe they should say, rather than what actually drives their purchases. The result is data that seems insightful but has little predictive power—explaining why 80 percent of new products fail despite rigorous testing, while occasionally products that perform terribly in testing (like Red Bull, universally described as "disgusting" by test subjects) become massive successes. The field of behavioral economics has begun to illuminate these hidden drivers of behavior. Daniel Kahneman's division of thinking into System 1 (fast, automatic, emotional) and System 2 (slow, deliberate, logical) reveals that most purchase decisions happen through System 1 processes. Yet traditional advertising models assume we are persuading System 2, the rational mind, when in reality that system rarely makes consumption choices. This meta-cognitive error—a misunderstanding of how we think—leads marketers to focus on rational messaging when emotional and associative elements are far more influential. Research becomes even more problematic when we consider the importance of context in decision-making. Laboratory settings and direct questioning remove people from the actual environments where they make choices. Factors like ambient scents, physical posture, social presence, and even the weather can dramatically influence decisions, yet these contextual elements are typically stripped away in research settings. One study found that people would pay $10 more for identical Nike shoes when the room was scented with a pleasant fragrance—a factor subjects would never identify as influencing their valuation. This doesn't mean we should abandon research altogether, but rather that we need to approach it differently. Triangulation—using multiple methods to observe behavior unobtrusively in context—offers more reliable insights. Ethnography, physiological measurements, and behavioral data from actual purchases provide stronger foundations than claimed attitudes or intentions. As researcher Philip Graves suggests, we must observe actual behavior surreptitiously, in context, with real stakes involved. Perhaps most importantly, we must recognize that emotions—not rational processing of information—drive most decisions. Robert Heath's research found that advertisements with high emotional content enhanced brand perceptions even without rational messages, while information-rich ads with low emotional content had negligible effects. Meta-analysis of the Institute of Practitioners in Advertising databank confirmed that "the most effective advertisements of all are those with little or no rational content." The path to influencing behavior runs through emotion, association, and context—not rational persuasion.

Chapter 3: Content Creation: From Broadcast to Engagement

The relationship between brands and audiences has fundamentally shifted from one-way broadcasting to multidirectional engagement. Traditional media planning operated on the assumption that channels were discrete entities through which messages could be efficiently transmitted to receptive consumers. This model has been shattered by digital transformation, which has stripped content from its distribution platforms and created an environment where attention must be earned rather than bought. Digital technology has democratized content creation, giving ordinary people access to tools once reserved for professionals. What previously required specialized equipment and expertise now takes merely the press of a button. This has led to an explosion of content—by 2010, according to Google CEO Eric Schmidt, mankind was creating as much content every two days as it had from the dawn of civilization until 2003. Brands now compete not just with other advertisers but with the entire output of human creativity for increasingly fragmented attention. The traditional value exchange of advertising—free content in exchange for viewing advertisements—has broken down in an on-demand world. Consumers empowered by technology can filter out unwanted interruptions, with research suggesting that 92 percent of ads are skipped by DVR users. This has led to what Seth Godin calls an "escalating battle" for attention, with brands increasing spending on interruption while consumers develop more sophisticated avoidance strategies. The result is a vicious cycle that benefits neither brands nor consumers. Forward-thinking brands have responded by shifting from interruption to value creation. Instead of forcing messages on reluctant audiences, they create content, experiences, tools, and platforms that people actively seek out. Red Bull's Stratos project—sending Felix Baumgartner to skydive from the edge of space—exemplifies this approach. The seven-year project culminated in a record-breaking jump broadcast on 40 television stations across 50 countries and watched live by 8 million people on YouTube. By creating a genuinely awe-inspiring event, Red Bull earned attention that no amount of traditional advertising could buy. This shift requires a fundamental reconsideration of what brands create and distribute. Content must be designed for voluntary consumption rather than forced viewing. The question becomes not "How can we deliver our message?" but "What can we create that people will choose to engage with?" Successful branded content resolves this tension by delivering genuine value—entertainment, utility, or meaning—while embodying brand values through "transitive action" rather than explicit messaging. The most effective communication in this environment balances reciprocity with imitation. Brands earn attention by solving real problems for people or creating behaviors that can be socially copied and spread. The Old Spice Response campaign—where the "Old Spice Man" responded to tweets with personalized videos—generated over a billion earned impressions by creating genuinely entertaining content that viewers actively shared. Similarly, Coca-Cola's "Happiness Machine" videos, showing real people receiving unexpected gifts from a vending machine, spread virally because they delivered authentic moments of joy rather than conventional advertising messages.

Chapter 4: Behaviour Drives Ideas: Do Things, Tell People

In a world saturated with content, brands must distinguish themselves through meaningful action rather than mere messaging. The traditional model where brand platform informs advertising has been inverted—now behavior must drive communication. The mantra "do things, tell people" encapsulates this shift from saying to doing, from claiming to demonstrating, from interrupting to creating. The democratization of media tools has eliminated the exclusivity that once made brand communication impressive by default. When everyone has access to sophisticated production capabilities, technical wizardry no longer impresses. What remains unique is the ability to leverage organizational scale to create real-world impact that individuals cannot replicate. Brands can act at a magnitude beyond individual capacity, and these actions become content engines that generate authentic stories worth sharing. Technology provides a canvas for brand behavior that extends beyond traditional advertising. As Arthur C. Clarke noted, "any sufficiently advanced technology is indistinguishable from magic." Brands can leverage technology to create tools, utilities, services, and experiences that earn attention through genuine usefulness or delight. The World Wildlife Fund's non-printable file format, developed to promote paper conservation, exemplifies how technology itself can communicate brand values more effectively than traditional messaging ever could. Actions at scale generate disproportionate impact and attention. Red Bull's Stratos project—sending a skydiver 24 miles above earth to break the world free-fall record—captured global attention not just because it was branded content, but because it was a genuinely unprecedented human achievement that required organizational resources and risk-taking beyond individual capability. The event generated millions of social media mentions and front-page news coverage worldwide, cementing Red Bull's association with its "gives you wings" positioning through action rather than assertion. Smaller actions can be equally powerful when they create authentic emotional connections with real people. Coca-Cola's "Happiness Machine" campaign installed an ordinary-looking vending machine in a university cafeteria that dispensed unexpected gifts—flowers, pizza, a six-foot sandwich—to surprised students. The genuine reactions of delight and sharing created compelling content that viewers found worthy of their attention, generating millions of views at a fraction of the cost of traditional advertising. By making real people happy in the real world, the brand demonstrated its values rather than merely claiming them. The most forward-thinking brands are moving beyond one-off actions to create ongoing platforms that facilitate collaboration between brands and communities. Nikon's Film Festival invited people to create short films using their cameras, generating thousands of creative submissions that showcased the product's capabilities while providing value to the filmmaking community. Similarly, Intel's Creator's Project supports artists using technology in innovative ways, making the brand relevant to creative audiences without traditional advertising. These platforms transform the relationship between brand and audience from broadcaster/recipient to collaborative partners in ongoing creation.

Chapter 5: Recombinant Culture: Talent Imitates, Genius Steals

Ideas are not original creations that spring fully formed from the mind—they are new combinations of existing elements. This understanding fundamentally changes how we approach creativity and innovation in a digital age dominated by remix culture. The romantic notion of originality as divine inspiration has given way to a more realistic view of creativity as recombination—standing on the semantic foundations of what came before to create higher-order meaning. At the neurological level, creating ideas involves connecting previously unconnected neural networks. As Jonah Lehrer points out in "How We Decide," "from the perspective of the brain—new ideas are just several old ideas had at the same time." The quality of an idea depends on how non-obvious the combination is and how effectively it solves the problem at hand. The most innovative thinkers excel not at creating something from nothing, but at finding unexpected connections between disparate domains. This process of creative recombination follows identifiable patterns. The most obvious combinations exist at the nearest edge of what Steven Johnson calls the "adjacent possible"—the realm of ideas that are currently achievable given existing building blocks. This explains why multiple teams often develop similar solutions independently when working on the same problem. The most valuable ideas, however, exist at the furthest viable extremes of the adjacent possible, requiring exposure to diverse influences and the ability to see connections across domains. The theft metaphor for creative recombination has deep historical roots. T.S. Eliot distinguished between imitation and stealing in his essay on the Elizabethan dramatist Philip Massinger: "Immature poets imitate; mature poets steal..." The difference is crucial—imitation merely copies the surface features without adding value, while creative theft transforms the stolen elements into something new. As Eliot explained, good poets typically borrow from "authors remote in time, or alien in language, or diverse in interest," creating tension through unexpected juxtapositions. This principle is vividly illustrated in the work of street artist Banksy, who deliberately steals from art history to create new meaning. When he engraved Picasso's quote "The bad artists imitate, the great artists steal" on a stone slab, signed it as Picasso, then crossed out the signature and replaced it with his own, he demonstrated the very concept he was appropriating. Similarly, Andy Warhol's appropriation of commercial imagery into fine art challenged distinctions between high and low culture while creating new aesthetic value through context and repetition. Digital technology has accelerated and democratized this recombinant process. The ease of copying, manipulating, and sharing digital content has created a generation for whom remixing is the default mode of expression. Control+C and Control+V shortcuts have become fundamental creative tools, turning existing media products into raw materials for new creation. The internet functions as an infinite stock house of signs to be recombined, allowing even non-specialists to participate in creative production at unprecedented scale. Far from depleting creativity, this recombinant approach actually expands it. When ideas are understood as new combinations, the potential for innovation becomes boundless. As Steve Jobs acknowledged, "We have always been shameless about stealing great ideas"—not to replicate them, but to transform them into something unique through recombination with other elements. The genius of Apple wasn't inventing entirely new technologies, but combining existing ones in ways that created unprecedented user experiences.

Chapter 6: Strategy Evolution: New Planning Tools for Attention

The fragmentation of media and profound changes in consumer behavior demand a fundamental evolution in strategic planning. Traditional planning approaches—focused on message transmission through discrete channels—are increasingly inadequate in a world where attention is scarce and must be earned rather than bought. A new strategic toolkit is emerging that emphasizes integrative thinking across touchpoints, behavioral response over claimed attitudes, and brand behavior over brand utterances. The division between planning and strategy must first be reconciled. Business strategy directs how companies marshal finite resources to achieve objectives and drive profitable growth. It doesn't assume advertising campaigns as the output, though traditional account planning often does. True strategy must be holistic, starting with business challenges rather than communication problems, and considering the full range of possible solutions rather than defaulting to advertising. As the advertising industry's old saying goes, "when all you have is a hammer, everything looks like a nail." Strategists must expand their toolkit beyond communication to consider product, service, experience, and behavior. Systems architecture replaces channel planning in this evolved approach. The multimodal complexity of the mediascape requires more than putting the same idea in many places—it necessitates designing interconnected systems where elements work together to create impact greater than the sum of parts. This integrative approach understands content and context, embraces participation, and leverages technology. It recognizes that algorithms like Facebook's favor content people engage with, making socially generated actions increasingly important in a world where consumer networks are supplanting broadcast ones. Brands must be reconceptualized as behavioral templates rather than message repositories. Jeff Bezos famously observed that "a brand for a company is like a reputation for a person. You earn reputation by trying to do hard things well." This shift from identity reflection to identity constitution—you are what you do, not what you say—fundamentally changes planning. Strategy must inform brand behavior in totality, guiding actions that solve real problems for people or create imitable behaviors that spread socially. The output becomes "ideas that can be advertised" rather than merely "advertising ideas." The brief itself—that essential document guiding creative development—requires reinvention. Traditional briefs assume a problem to be solved with advertising, "consumers" to "target," and a message to communicate to them. A more effective approach focuses on the behavior we wish to create, the community insights that will drive engagement, and the brand actions that will stimulate participation. It asks not "what should we say?" but "what should we do?" and "how will people respond?" This behavioral emphasis aligns with our understanding that actions, not messages, are what ultimately build brands. New metrics must align with this behavioral emphasis. Survey-based awareness tracking provides less robust measures of salience than behavioral data like search volume, engagement metrics, or actual purchase patterns. Planning must aggregate behavioral rather than cognitive responses, recognizing that what people do matters more than what they claim to think. The most valuable insights come from observing real behavior in context rather than artificially constructed research settings. Perhaps most importantly, planning must embrace experimentation as central to the process. In a rapidly evolving media environment, no fixed model can capture all the variables affecting communication effectiveness. The BMW ActiveE launch exemplifies this approach—creating content to attract the right community, developing tools to address specific barriers to adoption, and using real customer experiences to shape ongoing communication. By treating marketing as a social experiment rather than a predetermined campaign, brands can learn and adapt in real time, creating more relevant solutions for both business challenges and customer needs.

Summary

The fundamental shift in our relationship with attention demands a complete reinvention of how brands communicate and create value. Attention can no longer simply be purchased—it must be earned through behavior, utility, and meaningful engagement. The most successful brands in this new paradigm understand that every action communicates, that emotional connections trump rational messaging, and that solving real problems for people creates more impact than interrupting them with brand claims. This theoretical framework challenges us to move beyond outdated models of advertising as message transmission toward a more holistic understanding of brands as behavioral entities. By recognizing brands as modern myths that resolve cultural contradictions, leveraging the recombinant nature of creativity, and embracing a systems approach to communication, organizations can navigate the attention economy more effectively. The future belongs not to those who shout the loudest, but to those who create the most value—who understand that in a world of infinite content, what you do matters infinitely more than what you say.

About Author

Loading...

Faris Yakob

Read more