Thanks for the Feedback

Thanks for the Feedback Plot Summary

Introduction

Feedback is a universal experience that shapes our personal and professional lives. Whether it's a performance review at work, a comment from a loved one, or even a stranger's observation, feedback can either propel us forward or leave us feeling defensive and stuck. The challenge isn't just in the feedback itself, but in how we receive it. Our reactions often prevent us from hearing valuable insights that could transform our lives. When we receive feedback, powerful triggers can block our ability to absorb what might be useful information. Understanding these triggers is the first step toward mastering the art of receiving feedback well. By recognizing what happens when we feel criticized or challenged, we can develop strategies to stay balanced and open, even when feedback stings. This journey of transforming criticism into growth begins with understanding the true nature of feedback and learning specific skills to engage with it productively.

Chapter 1: Recognize the Three Types of Feedback

Feedback comes in three distinct flavors, each serving a different purpose in our lives. Understanding the difference between appreciation, coaching, and evaluation can transform how we receive and process feedback, making it far more valuable and less threatening. Appreciation is fundamentally about relationship and human connection. It's the "thanks" that acknowledges our efforts and contributions. When we receive genuine appreciation, we feel seen and valued. This form of feedback satisfies our basic human need for recognition. A manager who says, "I noticed how you stayed late to finish that project—it made a real difference to the team" is providing appreciation that builds connection and motivation. Coaching aims to help someone learn, grow, or change. It's forward-looking and improvement-oriented. When a colleague suggests, "Try speaking more slowly during your presentations to help the audience absorb your key points," they're offering coaching. The purpose isn't to judge but to help you become more effective. Coaching works best when it's specific and actionable. Evaluation tells you where you stand against expectations or others. It's assessment, ranking, and rating. When your boss says, "Your performance this quarter was below target," that's evaluation. While often necessary, evaluation can trigger our defenses because it feels like judgment on our worth or ability. This is why performance reviews can be so stressful—they're primarily evaluative. The challenge arises when these types get crossed or confused. April, an assistant to a law partner named Donald, seeks appreciation for her years of dedicated service but receives coaching on time management instead. Cody, a first-year lawyer, wants coaching on research efficiency but gets evaluation: "You're right on track for a first-year." And Evelyn, a senior associate, seeks evaluation about her partnership prospects but receives appreciation for her long hours. These cross-transactions leave everyone frustrated because their needs remain unmet. To navigate these challenges, start by clarifying what kind of feedback you're seeking or receiving. When asking for feedback, be specific: "I'd appreciate your thoughts on how I could improve my client presentations" signals you want coaching, not just appreciation. When receiving feedback, mentally sort it into the appropriate category. This helps you respond appropriately and extract maximum value from every feedback interaction.

Chapter 2: Separate Facts from Interpretations

When receiving feedback, one of the most crucial skills is distinguishing between facts and interpretations. This separation helps us understand what's actually being said versus what we think is being said, allowing us to engage with feedback more productively. Feedback often arrives with generic labels that seem clear but contain little substance. Your boss might tell you to "be more proactive" or a colleague might suggest you "maintain appropriate professional distance" with clients. These labels are like soup can labels—they give us a general idea of the topic, but they're not the meal itself. The challenge is that both giver and receiver interpret these labels differently based on their own experiences and assumptions. Holly, a public defender, experiences this firsthand when her supervising attorney, Irwin, tells her she gets "too enmeshed" in clients' personal lives and doesn't maintain "appropriate professional boundaries." Holly dismisses this feedback, thinking Irwin wants her to care less about her clients. But that's not what Irwin meant at all. When they discuss it further, Irwin explains he's concerned about Holly giving money to defendants and blurring professional lines in ways that could lead clients to take advantage of her or stop trusting her professional advice. To understand feedback, we need to ask where it's coming from and where it's going. The "coming from" aspect includes both data (what the giver has directly observed) and interpretation (the meaning they make from those observations). The "going to" aspect clarifies what the advice is or what consequences might follow. Without exploring both aspects, we risk misunderstanding the feedback entirely. This is why "wrong spotting"—our tendency to immediately identify what's wrong with feedback—is so counterproductive. Instead, we should practice "difference spotting"—understanding why we see things differently from the feedback giver. This might be because we have different data (they see things we don't and vice versa) or because we interpret that data differently based on our unique experiences, values, and implicit rules. Paul, a CEO receiving troubling results from an employee climate survey, demonstrates effective feedback reception when meeting with Monisha from HR. Rather than defending or dismissing the feedback, he works to understand it: "What does it mean that managers are feeling 'disempowered and out of the loop'?" He asks for specific examples and explores how his own actions might contribute to the problem. By seeking to understand rather than immediately agree or disagree, Paul creates space for genuine learning.

Chapter 3: Identify Your Blind Spots

We all have blind spots—aspects of ourselves that others can see but we cannot. Understanding these blind spots is essential for receiving feedback effectively and growing from it. The challenge lies in the fundamental gap between how we intend to come across and how others actually perceive us. Annabelle, a talented professional who prides herself on being fast, creative, and careful, faces this challenge. Her team members describe her as "difficult," "impatient," and disrespectful—the same issues raised in her previous review three years ago. Despite her genuine efforts to improve, Annabelle is blind to how her facial expressions, tone of voice, and body language leak her true feelings of impatience and contempt when team members ask questions she feels they should know the answers to. This gap between intention and impact exists because of several behavioral blind spots we all share. First, we can't see our own faces—the primary canvas through which others read our emotions. Second, we don't hear our tone of voice the way others do; neuroscience shows that when we speak, the superior temporal sulcus (the part of our brain that processes vocal tone) actually turns off. Third, we're often unaware of our behavioral patterns that are glaringly obvious to others, like constantly checking our phones or interrupting in meetings. These blind spots are amplified by three key dynamics. First, there's emotional math: we tend to subtract certain emotions from our self-image ("That anger isn't really who I am"), while others count those same emotions double ("That anger is exactly who you are"). Second, we attribute our actions to situations ("I was rushed"), while others attribute them to our character ("You're disorganized"). Third, we judge ourselves by our intentions, while others judge us by our impact on them. To see our blind spots more clearly, we need strategies that go beyond simply trying harder to see ourselves. Ask specific questions like "What do you see me doing, or failing to do, that is getting in my own way?" Look for patterns in feedback across different relationships and contexts. Get a second opinion from someone you trust, explicitly asking them to be an "honest mirror" rather than a "supportive mirror." Consider recording yourself in meetings or presentations to hear your tone and see your expressions as others do. Perhaps most importantly, recognize that changing how you come across isn't just about behavior—it's about addressing your underlying feelings and attitudes. When Annabelle was told colleagues found her contemptuous, she focused on acting more respectful. But her colleagues didn't want her to seem respectful; they wanted her to feel respectful. Either she needed to discuss her true feelings and expectations, or work to genuinely change those feelings—not just mask them.

Chapter 4: Navigate Relationship Triggers

When feedback comes from someone we have a relationship with, our reactions are often more about the relationship than the feedback itself. These "relationship triggers" can derail productive conversations and prevent us from learning valuable insights. Consider what happens between Louie and Kim in the HBO sitcom Lucky Louie. Louie gives Kim red roses, and Kim responds by telling him she doesn't like red roses and has told him this before. Instead of hearing her feedback, Louie immediately changes the subject to how Kim should have thanked him first before criticizing the gift. They end up in a heated argument where neither person's concerns are addressed. This is a classic "switchtrack" conversation—where the original feedback triggers a relationship concern, causing the conversation to split into two separate topics that never intersect. Kim's topic is "Louie not listening to me," while Louie's topic becomes "Kim is ungrateful." Each person stays on their own track, talking past each other and becoming increasingly frustrated. Relationship triggers typically fall into two categories: what we think about the giver and how we feel treated by them. We might dismiss feedback because we question the giver's credibility ("What do they know about this?"), trust their motives ("They're just trying to make me look bad"), or judge their skill in delivering feedback ("Why would you say that in front of everyone?"). Or we might react because the feedback threatens our need for appreciation ("After all I've done, this is the thanks I get?"), autonomy ("Stop telling me what to do"), or acceptance ("You're saying I'm not good enough as I am"). To navigate relationship triggers productively, first learn to spot when switchtracking occurs. When you notice two topics emerging, explicitly acknowledge both: "I see two related but separate topics for us to discuss. They are both important. Let's discuss each topic fully but separately." This "signposting" breaks the reactive pattern and creates space to address both concerns. Also, listen for relationship issues lurking beneath seemingly straightforward advice. When someone says, "You might want to be more responsive," they might really mean, "I'm frustrated that you don't return my calls." When your mother asks, "Why aren't you married yet?" instead of defending your dating choices, ask what she's worried about. Often, addressing the underlying relationship concern is more important than the surface-level feedback. Surprisingly, some of our most valuable feedback comes from people we find difficult or don't particularly like. These challenging relationships often reveal our blind spots and show us how we behave under pressure or in conflict. As one executive noted, "Want to fast-track your growth? Go directly to the people you have the hardest time with. Ask them what you're doing that's exacerbating the situation. They will surely tell you."

Chapter 5: Develop a Growth Identity

How we respond to feedback is profoundly influenced by the story we tell about ourselves—our identity. Some people hold their identity in ways that make them brittle and defensive when receiving feedback, while others have developed a robust, growth-oriented identity that welcomes learning opportunities. Seth, a counselor who works with traumatized children, experienced an identity trigger when his boss casually mentioned Seth's disorganization in front of a supervisee. Though the comment was minor, Seth was instantly overwhelmed with shame and nearly canceled an important trip to celebrate his widowed father's birthday. Later, after the successful celebration, Seth couldn't understand why he had reacted so strongly. The answer lies in how Seth held his identity. Like many of us, he had an "all-or-nothing" identity that operated like a light switch—either he was completely competent or utterly incompetent. When feedback contradicted his self-image as organized and professional, it threatened to flip that switch from "good" to "bad," leaving him no middle ground. To develop a more robust identity, we need to make two key shifts. First, we must give up simple labels and embrace complexity. Instead of seeing ourselves as either "good" or "bad," we recognize that we're complicated—capable of both strengths and weaknesses, successes and failures. This nuanced self-understanding creates space to receive feedback without feeling completely destabilized. Second, we need to shift from a fixed mindset to a growth mindset. Stanford researcher Carol Dweck discovered that people with fixed mindsets see their traits and abilities as carved in stone—you either have talent or you don't. In contrast, those with growth mindsets believe their qualities can be developed through dedication and effort. This fundamental difference affects how we hear feedback: fixed-mindset individuals hear it as judgment of their inherent worth, while growth-mindset people hear it as information about their current state and opportunities to improve. Three practices can help cultivate a growth identity. First, "sort toward coaching"—train yourself to hear feedback as helpful information rather than evaluation whenever possible. When your friend suggests a better route to the airport, don't hear it as judgment that you don't know your way around; hear it as useful information that might make your journey easier. Second, "unpack judgment from evaluation"—separate assessment (where you stand) from consequences (what will happen) and judgment (the story about what it means). This helps you focus on the factual elements without getting caught in potentially distorted interpretations. Third, "give yourself a second score" for how you handle feedback, regardless of the initial evaluation. After every failure or setback, you can still earn an A+ for how you respond to it. Mel and Melinda both received harsh criticism on their first YouTube video, but while Mel became defensive and blamed viewers for not understanding their vision, Melinda used the feedback to improve her skills and eventually created successful videos. Both got a thumbs-down first score, but only Melinda earned a thumbs-up second score.

Chapter 6: Take Action on Useful Feedback

Receiving feedback is only the beginning; the real value comes from taking meaningful action based on what you've learned. But how do you move from understanding feedback to implementing changes that lead to growth? Martin, an experienced oil rig driller, faces this challenge when reviewing his development plan. The form asks him to list areas for improvement, but Martin struggles to identify specific actions. His supervisor had mentioned he could be more "collaborative" and "strategic," but these vague labels left Martin unsure about what concrete steps to take. The key to turning feedback into action is to make it specific and actionable. Vague feedback like "be more proactive" or "improve your leadership" needs to be translated into clear behaviors you can practice. When Martin asked his supervisor to clarify what "collaborative" meant in practice, he learned it meant involving junior team members in planning discussions and acknowledging their contributions publicly. This clarity gave Martin specific behaviors to implement. Once you understand what to change, start with small experiments rather than attempting complete transformation. Research shows that tiny habits are more likely to stick than ambitious overhauls. Martin began by inviting two junior team members to planning meetings and asking for their input on specific technical questions—a manageable change that didn't require him to reinvent his leadership style overnight. Expect implementation to follow what researchers call the "J curve"—performance often dips before it improves when you're trying something new. When Martin first involved junior team members, meetings took longer and felt less efficient. But he persisted through this temporary dip, and within weeks, the team was identifying potential problems earlier and generating more innovative solutions. Another effective strategy is to "coach your coach"—actively involve the feedback giver in your improvement efforts. Martin asked his supervisor to observe specific meetings and provide real-time feedback on his collaboration. This approach created a partnership for improvement and demonstrated Martin's commitment to growth. Finally, create systems that invite ongoing feedback. Martin established a simple practice of asking team members one question at the end of each shift: "What's one thing I could do differently tomorrow to make your job easier?" This regular check-in provided continuous input and showed the team that Martin valued their perspectives. The most successful feedback implementers understand that change isn't about fixing deficiencies but about continuous growth. They approach feedback with curiosity rather than defensiveness, asking "What can I learn here?" rather than "Why are they criticizing me?" This mindset shift transforms feedback from a threatening judgment into a valuable gift—one that offers unique insights into how we can become more effective in our work and relationships.

Summary

Throughout this exploration of feedback, we've discovered that receiving feedback well isn't about passively accepting whatever comes our way—it's about engaging skillfully with the information others provide and making thoughtful choices about what to do with it. As Carol Dweck reminds us, "In the growth mindset, challenges are exciting rather than threatening. So rather than thinking, 'Oh, I'm going to reveal my weaknesses,' you say, 'Wow, here's a chance to grow.'" This perspective transforms feedback from something to endure into something to embrace. Your next step is simple but powerful: The next time you receive feedback that makes you uncomfortable, pause before responding. Notice your reaction, take a breath, and ask one question that comes from genuine curiosity rather than defense. This small shift can open the door to insights that might otherwise remain hidden, setting you on a path of continuous growth and deeper connection with those around you. By separating facts from interpretations, identifying blind spots, navigating relationship triggers, developing a growth identity, and taking meaningful action, you can transform even the most challenging feedback into opportunities for profound personal and professional development.

About Author

Loading...

Douglas Stone

Read more