The Art of Gathering

The Art of Gathering Plot Summary

Introduction

The lights dimmed in the grand ballroom as two hundred strangers who had traveled from across the country sat in perfect silence. Instead of the usual conference chatter or awkward small talk, each person wrote on a small card the answer to a deeply personal question: "What have you never told anyone about why you do the work you do?" Minutes later, these same strangers were sharing vulnerabilities with one another, forming connections that would last far beyond the three-day gathering. This wasn't coincidence - it was by design. Every day, we participate in gatherings that range from the mundane to the momentous: Monday meetings, birthday celebrations, conferences, weddings, dinner parties, strategy sessions. Yet how often do these gatherings leave us feeling truly connected, transformed, or inspired? Too many of our gatherings fail to fulfill their potential because we've never been taught how to create meaningful human experiences. The difference between a forgettable meeting and a transformative one rarely comes down to the food served or the venue chosen. Instead, it hinges on intentional choices that shape how people connect, what they share, and the temporary world they inhabit together. Through thoughtful design and generous hosting, we can create gatherings that truly matter.

Chapter 1: Finding Purpose: Why Your Gathering Matters

In a suburb of Minneapolis, a small group of architects had gathered for a two-day workshop. They were discussing their firm's vision, struggling with a crucial question: Should they remain a traditional brick-and-mortar architecture firm, or evolve into an experience design firm? The conversation was polite, professional, and utterly lifeless. People smiled and nodded, careful not to rock the boat. The workshop facilitator noticed this and whispered to the client, "We need more heat." During lunch, while the architects were away, the facilitator and client transformed the room. When the team returned, they found two giant posters featuring wrestlers' bodies with their colleagues' faces photoshopped onto them. One represented "The Brain" (experience design), the other "The Body" (traditional architecture). Music from Rocky played as the facilitator announced they would hold a "cage match" to debate the firm's future. Two architects were assigned as wrestlers, each given three minutes to make the strongest case for their side. The audience had to choose sides - neutrality was forbidden. Within minutes, this previously buttoned-up group was barking, cheering, and deeply engaged in a substantive debate about their future. The playful format created a safe space for real conflict to emerge. By the end of the "match," the firm had clarity about their path forward. They would remain focused on physical, brick-and-mortar architecture - "The Body" had won. What transformed this gathering from polite but meaningless conversation to productive debate wasn't a better agenda or fancier refreshments. It was purpose. The facilitator recognized that the group needed to have a real discussion about contradictory visions, and designed an experience specifically to surface genuine disagreement. When we gather with purpose, we create the conditions for something meaningful to happen.

Chapter 2: Inviting Intentionally: The Power of Selective Inclusion

Back in 2001, Chris Varelas, then an investment banker at Citigroup, was representing Lucent in a potential $20 billion merger with the French telecommunications giant Alcatel. After a year of talks, the deal seemed poised for completion. Only one gathering remained: a face-to-face meeting for executives to complete final due diligence. Originally scheduled for an unremarkable airport hotel in New Jersey, the meeting was relocated at the last minute when an Alcatel director fell ill. The new venue? Château des Mesnuls, an opulent 55-room Louis XIII-style castle near Paris, owned by an Alcatel subsidiary. The magnificent setting featured Persian rugs, gold frescoes, chandeliers, and portraits of famous French soldiers. What should have been the culmination of successful negotiations instead became their undoing. After three days of meetings, Lucent's chairman abruptly walked out, and the merger collapsed. Years later, Varelas remained convinced: "I will argue until the day I die that the meeting place we chose killed the deal." Within the château's regal walls, the previously maintained fiction of a "merger of equals" crumbled. Alcatel executives, suddenly on home turf surrounded by symbols of French greatness, began referring to "when we take over" rather than maintaining the careful language of partnership they'd used for months. The environment had fundamentally altered the dynamics between the participants. The lesson here extends far beyond billion-dollar deals. Every venue carries implicit messages and shapes behavior in predictable ways. We walk into boardrooms and instinctively arrange ourselves according to hierarchy. We enter houses of worship and naturally lower our voices. When choosing where to gather, we're not just selecting a container for our event - we're establishing a powerful context that will either serve our purpose or undermine it. The environment we select becomes a silent participant that shapes every interaction within it.

Chapter 3: Creating Structure: Rules and Boundaries That Liberate

At a dinner in Abu Dhabi on the sidelines of the World Economic Forum, fifteen strangers from various backgrounds – government advisors, journalists, entrepreneurs, and activists – were invited to share toasts on the theme of "a good life." The rules were simple but specific: each person would offer a toast starting with a personal story, concluding by raising a glass to a value or lesson. And there was one final rule that created both tension and momentum – the last person to toast would have to sing. As the evening progressed, something remarkable happened. Rather than offering polished, professional personas, the guests began sharing surprisingly intimate stories. One woman recalled her mother's words on her deathbed: "I spent 90 percent of my time worrying about things that didn't matter. Don't do that." Another confessed to a daily "death meditation" ritual she had never previously shared. Someone raised a glass "To death!" and everyone joined, glasses in the air. This gathering illustrated a paradox that runs counter to our instincts: well-designed constraints often create greater freedom. By establishing clear rules – start with a personal story, conclude with a toast, the last person sings – the hosts created a structure that made vulnerability not just possible but expected. Without these boundaries, the dinner might have defaulted to professional networking, with attendees exchanging rehearsed elevator pitches rather than authentic experiences. The principle applies far beyond dinner parties. From the Japanese tea ceremony to Daybreaker morning dance parties, gatherings with the most memorable experiences often have the clearest rules. When guests understand the parameters – whether it's leaving phones at the door, wearing all white, or speaking for exactly two minutes – they can relax into the experience rather than wondering what's expected of them. The right constraints don't diminish freedom; they create the conditions for a different kind of freedom to emerge.

Chapter 4: Building Connection: From Strangers to Community

Jill Soloway, the Emmy-winning creator of the television series "Transparent," begins each day of filming with a ritual called "Box." After breakfast, a wooden box is placed in a central area. The entire cast and crew – from lead actors to extras – gather in a circle around it, chanting "Box, Box, Box!" until everyone has joined. Then, one by one, people step onto the box to speak, sharing whatever is on their mind – personal struggles, breakthroughs, fears, joys. On one occasion, a background actor who was supposed to appear in a restaurant scene stepped onto the box. "This woman got up there to say that she's the manager of a bank down the street and that she'd never had this experience before of feeling involved, like a family," recalled actor Griffin Dunne. The ritual transforms what could be a hierarchical workplace into a community where everyone's voice matters. As actor Amy Landecker noted, "Guest stars, and I'm not exaggerating, cry when they leave our set. They're so upset that they don't get to stay and that the rest of the business does not function that way." Box takes only twenty to twenty-five minutes of production time, but its impact reverberates throughout the day. By creating a space where people see and are seen by one another, Soloway builds the foundation for the vulnerability and authenticity their storytelling requires. The ritual embodies a truth about all meaningful gatherings: connection doesn't happen automatically when people share physical space. It requires intentional design. The power of such deliberate connection extends far beyond Hollywood. When Johns Hopkins Hospital implemented a pre-surgery checklist that required all team members to introduce themselves and share concerns before operations began, complications and deaths fell by 35 percent. The simple act of acknowledging each person in the room – making them visible to one another – fundamentally changed how the teams functioned, giving everyone permission to speak up when they noticed problems.

Chapter 5: Embracing Tension: The Value of Productive Conflict

A political gathering in the UK brought together a dozen major civic leaders working on the same controversial issue from different angles. Though technically on the same side, they had a complicated history and deep internal conflicts. Their previous collaboration on a global project had largely failed, but no one was willing to admit it openly. The facilitator faced a dilemma: should the group maintain polite harmony or risk exploring their differences? Instead of avoiding tension, the facilitator methodically designed for it. She began by interviewing each leader privately, mapping the sources of conflict. She created a digital workbook with provocative questions that participants completed beforehand, knowing their answers would be shared anonymously with the group. The night before the main gathering, she hosted a dinner where participants shared toasts on the theme of "conflict" – normalizing the very topic they needed to discuss. When the main gathering began, the facilitator read aloud anonymous excerpts from the workbooks, placing the group's unspoken tensions directly on the table. "What are people avoiding that they don't think they're avoiding? What are the sacred cows here? What goes unsaid?" she had asked herself when preparing. Rather than allowing conflicts to emerge chaotically, she created a structured space for productive disagreement. Throughout the day, when tension arose between participants about specific incidents, the facilitator didn't rush to smooth things over. Instead, she slowed the conversation down, helping people go "below the iceberg" to examine the underlying values and assumptions driving their positions. By the day's end, participants had gained clarity about when collaboration made sense and when it didn't. They agreed to continue meeting to pursue deeper conversations. This gathering illustrates a counterintuitive truth: avoiding tension doesn't create harmony – it creates superficiality. When we design gatherings that allow for productive conflict, we create the possibility for genuine understanding and breakthrough. The key isn't to eliminate disagreement but to structure it in ways that build rather than destroy relationships.

Chapter 6: Managing Energy: From Opening to Closing Moments

A teacher at Princeton University carefully maintains a tradition for Commencement Day: students must never walk through the FitzRandolph Gate on campus until graduation. According to campus legend, those who pass through prematurely won't graduate. On the appointed day, after receiving their diplomas, the new graduates process through the gate together, physically crossing the threshold between their student lives and what comes next. This ritual demonstrates a fundamental principle of gathering: beginnings and endings matter disproportionately. Research shows that people primarily remember the first 5 percent, the last 5 percent, and any peak moments of an experience. Yet hosts often pay the least attention to how they open and close their gatherings, treating these critical moments as afterthoughts. Consider the funeral where a minister began by discussing parking arrangements for the reception. Or the conference that fizzled out after the last session with no proper conclusion. These missed opportunities reflect a common mistake: assuming that openings and closings will somehow take care of themselves. Skilled gatherers understand that openings should function as a kind of "pleasant shock therapy" – simultaneously honoring guests while creating a sense of awe. At his butcher shop in Tuscany, Dario Cecchini welcomes visitors with wine and bread, then dramatically raises bloody steaks overhead, thundering "To beef, or not to beef!" before personally serving each guest. The theatrical opening transforms what could be a simple retail transaction into a memorable experience. Equally important is how gatherings end. When the Seeds of Peace summer camp brings together teenagers from conflict regions like Israel and Palestine, they begin preparing for departure three days before the final goodbye. Through a series of carefully designed activities, counselors help campers process what they've experienced and prepare to return to their often-divided communities. The closing isn't an afterthought but a crucial part of the transformation process. By giving special attention to these threshold moments, hosts create experiences that resonate long after the gathering ends. Opening well builds connection and sets expectations; closing well helps participants integrate what they've learned and carry it forward into their lives.

Chapter 7: Leaving Impact: Ensuring Your Gathering Creates Change

At Junior Cotillion, a charm school in Northern Virginia, students learn proper telephone courtesy, acknowledgment of gifts, formal dining etiquette, and other social behaviors deemed essential for polite society. The curriculum reflects a larger philosophy: there is one correct way to behave, and knowing these rules will help you ascend socially. The approach is fixed, imperious, and exclusionary – built on unspoken codes that insiders understand and outsiders cannot easily access. Contrast this with Dîner en Blanc, a global phenomenon where thousands of strangers dressed in white gather for elegant dinners in public spaces. The events have strict rules: participants must bring proper tables, chairs, china, and food; wear all white; follow specific choreography throughout the evening. Yet unlike traditional etiquette, these rules are explicitly stated, temporary, and accessible to anyone willing to follow them for one night only. The difference between these approaches reflects a profound shift in how we can think about gathering. Traditional etiquette worked well when groups were homogeneous and stable – when everyone shared similar backgrounds and expectations. But in our increasingly diverse and fluid world, such implicit codes often create barriers rather than connections. Rules-based gatherings, by contrast, can create temporary communities across differences precisely because they make expectations explicit. When the Dîner en Blanc came to Tokyo, organizer Kumi Ishihara faced the challenge of bringing a very public European dinner concept to a culture where dining with strangers was uncommon. Through months of careful communication about the rules and the experience, she helped 1,600 Japanese participants step into an unfamiliar social world together. The explicit structure created freedom rather than constraint – freedom to connect across differences that might otherwise keep people apart. This approach to gathering reflects a deeper truth: meaningful experiences don't happen by accident. They require thoughtful design, clear purpose, and a willingness to guide participants through unfamiliar territory. When we gather with intention – whether for a family dinner, a conference, or a community event – we create the possibility for genuine connection and transformation.

Summary

The most powerful gatherings share a fundamental quality: they don't just happen – they're designed. From the controversial rules of Dîner en Blanc to the profound vulnerability of Jill Soloway's "Box" ritual, truly impactful experiences arise when hosts make intentional choices that serve a clear purpose. The difference between a forgettable meeting and a transformative one rarely comes down to logistics. Instead, it hinges on how deliberately we shape human connections. The gatherings that matter most combine thoughtful inclusion with meaningful exclusion, creating the right constellation of people for the purpose at hand. They establish environments that embody their aims, whether through château grandeur or classroom simplicity. They embrace productive tension rather than avoiding it, and they pay special attention to beginnings and endings – the moments that disproportionately shape what people remember and carry forward. Above all, they create temporary alternative worlds where different rules apply, allowing participants to step outside their normal patterns and discover new possibilities. When we approach gathering as a creative act rather than a logistical challenge, we unlock its power to transform not just moments, but lives.

About Author

Loading...

Priya Parker

Priya Parker is a facilitator and strategic advisor. She is the founder of Thrive Labs, at which she helps activists, elected officials, corporate executives, educators, and philanthropists create transformative gatherings. She works with teams and leaders across technology, business, the arts, fashion, and politics to clarify their vision for the future and build meaningful, purpose-driven communities. Her clients have included the Museum of Modern Art, LVMH, the World Economic Forum, meetup.com, Stone Barns Center for Food and Agriculture, the Union for Concerned Scientists, and Civitas Public Affairs. Trained in the field of conflict resolution, Parker has worked on race relations on American college campuses and on peace processes in the Arab world, southern Africa, and India. She is a founding member of the Sustained Dialogue Campus Network. She has been appointed a member of the World Economic Forum Global Agenda Council on Values Council and the New Models of Leadership Council. She is also a senior expert at Mobius Executive Leadership. Priya is the author of The Art of Gathering: How We Meet and Why It Matters (Riverhead Books, 2018). She is passionate about helping people create gatherings in their work and life that are transformative and meaningful for the people in them. She is also the co-creator of the 15 Toasts dinner series format and I Am Here Days. Her TEDx talk on purpose has been viewed more than 1 million times. Priya studied organizational design at M.I.T., public policy at the Harvard Kennedy School, and political and social thought at the University of Virginia. She lives in Brooklyn, New York.

Read more