
The Big Necessity
The Unmentionable World of Human Waste and Why It Matters
Categories
Nonfiction, Health, Science, History, Politics, Sociology, Medicine, Society, Microhistory, Environment
Content Type
Book
Binding
Hardcover
Year
2008
Publisher
Metropolitan Books
Language
English
ASIN
B003UYV1U6
ISBN
0805082719
ISBN13
9780805082715
File Download
PDF | EPUB
The Big Necessity Plot Summary
Introduction
Every day, billions of people around the world perform one of humanity's most universal yet unmentionable acts: they go to the bathroom. This seemingly private function connects us all, yet we rarely discuss it in polite company. The management of human waste represents one of civilization's greatest public health achievements and most pressing challenges. While many of us in developed nations have the luxury of flushing and forgetting, 2.6 billion people worldwide lack access to basic sanitation facilities, leading to devastating consequences for health, dignity, and development. The story of how societies handle human waste reveals profound truths about our values, technological progress, and social inequalities. From the sophisticated toilets of Japan to the open defecation practices in rural India, from the Victorian-era sewers beneath London to space station waste systems, this hidden world shapes our environment, health, and daily lives in ways we seldom acknowledge. By examining this taboo subject, we gain insight into sustainable resource management, public health challenges, and the complex intersection of technology, culture, and human dignity that affects us all.
Chapter 1: The Global Sanitation Crisis: 2.6 Billion Without Access
Imagine waking up each morning and having no toilet to use. For 2.6 billion people worldwide, this isn't a nightmare scenario but daily reality. These individuals don't merely lack a toilet in their home - they have no access to any form of sanitation whatsoever. No latrine, no bucket, no designated place to relieve themselves. Instead, they must defecate in forests, fields, or urban alleyways, often risking personal safety and dignity in the process. The health implications of this crisis are staggering. A single gram of feces can contain 10 million viruses, 1 million bacteria, 1,000 parasite cysts, and 100 worm eggs. When human waste contaminates water sources and food supplies, it creates perfect conditions for disease transmission. Diarrhea, primarily caused by fecally contaminated food or water, kills a child every fifteen seconds - more deaths in the past decade than all armed conflicts since World War II. For children in developing countries, surviving diarrheal disease represents a greater challenge than overcoming AIDS, tuberculosis, or malaria combined. The sanitation crisis affects not just health but economic development, education, and gender equality. Women and girls bear a disproportionate burden, often waiting until darkness to relieve themselves for privacy, risking sexual assault and animal attacks. Schools without adequate facilities see higher dropout rates, especially among adolescent girls. Meanwhile, the economic toll is enormous - every dollar invested in sanitation brings an average return of seven dollars through reduced healthcare costs and increased productivity. Despite its critical importance, sanitation remains neglected in global development priorities. While water projects receive abundant funding and political attention, sanitation is often an afterthought. This neglect persists despite evidence that improving sanitation reduces diarrhea by nearly 40%, while providing cleaner water only reduces it by 16-20%. The crisis represents not just a failure of infrastructure but a failure of political will and public discourse - a silence born from cultural taboos around discussing human waste.
Chapter 2: Sewers and Civilizations: Engineering the Invisible Infrastructure
The modern sewer system represents one of humanity's most significant yet least celebrated engineering achievements. Hidden beneath our cities lies a vast network of pipes, tunnels, and treatment facilities that silently process our waste and protect public health. In London alone, the sewer network spans tens of thousands of miles, though the exact length remains unknown even to Thames Water, the utility responsible for maintaining it. This invisible infrastructure emerged from crisis. In 1858, London experienced the "Great Stink," when the sewage-filled Thames River emitted such horrific odors that Parliament was forced to act. Engineer Joseph Bazalgette designed a revolutionary system of intercepting sewers that would carry waste away from the city center. His engineering marvel, built between 1858 and 1866, used 318 million bricks and cost the equivalent of £6 billion in modern currency. Most importantly, it effectively ended London's devastating cholera epidemics, which had previously killed tens of thousands. The relationship between sanitation and public health wasn't fully understood until 1854, when Dr. John Snow made the groundbreaking connection between contaminated water and cholera transmission. By removing the handle from the Broad Street pump in London's Soho district, he demonstrated that sewage-contaminated water was spreading disease. This insight fundamentally changed how cities approached waste management, establishing the scientific basis for modern sanitation systems. Today's sewers face mounting challenges. Population growth, aging infrastructure, climate change, and industrial waste all strain systems designed for different eras. In New York City, combined sewer systems that handle both sewage and stormwater regularly overflow during heavy rainfall, discharging raw sewage into waterways. Meanwhile, in London, Victorian-era pipes struggle to serve a population that has grown from 3 million to 13 million. The consequences of infrastructure failure can be immediate and severe - from sewage backing up into homes to contaminated drinking water. Despite their critical importance, sewers and those who maintain them remain largely invisible to the public. The "flushers" who keep London's sewers flowing number just 39 for the entire metropolis, carrying irreplaceable knowledge about the system's quirks and vulnerabilities. As one wastewater official noted, "The best I can hope for is indifference" - a sentiment that reflects society's reluctance to acknowledge the systems that make modern urban living possible.
Chapter 3: High-Tech Toilets: Japan's Bathroom Revolution
In Japan, the toilet is not merely a utilitarian fixture but a technological marvel and cultural phenomenon. The Japanese high-function toilet, commonly known as the Washlet, can check blood pressure, play music, wash and dry the user with precisely aimed water jets, deodorize the air, illuminate the bathroom at night, and even automatically lower the seat lid. These sophisticated devices have become so mainstream that more Japanese households now own a Washlet than a computer. This toilet revolution represents a remarkable cultural transformation. Just sixty years ago, Japan was predominantly a nation of pit latrines. People squatted rather than sat, used paper rather than water for cleansing, and had no concept of a bidet. Today, only 3 percent of toilets produced in Japan are squat types. The Japanese sit, use water for cleansing, and expect heated seats as standard. In less than a century, the Japanese toilet industry achieved the equivalent of persuading a country to completely transform its most intimate habits. The success of the high-function toilet in Japan stems from brilliant marketing and cultural adaptation. TOTO, Japan's largest toilet manufacturer, recognized that Japanese culture places high value on cleanliness and bathing rituals. The company positioned the Washlet as an extension of these values, emphasizing how it could purify both the body and the bathroom environment. A memorable 1982 television campaign featured a young woman declaring that "even though it's a bottom, it wants to be washed, too" - breaking taboos while creating a national conversation about toilet hygiene. Interestingly, this toilet revolution has largely failed to spread beyond Japan's borders. In the United States and Europe, consumers remain skeptical of bidet functions and heated seats, viewing them as unnecessary luxuries or strange foreign concepts. Cultural attitudes toward bodily functions, deeply ingrained toilet habits, and simple resistance to change have limited global adoption. As one Inax (TOTO's competitor) executive lamented after years of trying to sell high-function toilets in America: "Americans just don't want to use it. They're not scared. They're just not interested." The Japanese toilet industry continues to innovate, developing features like urine analysis for health monitoring and nanotechnology for self-cleaning surfaces. These advancements reflect a culture that takes toilets seriously and is willing to invest in improving this everyday experience. While Western manufacturers focus on water conservation and basic functionality, Japanese companies envision the toilet as a health device, comfort station, and technological showcase - a vision that may eventually transform bathroom habits worldwide.
Chapter 4: The Biosolids Debate: When Waste Becomes Resource
When sewage is treated, the solid material removed from wastewater is called sludge - or in the United States, "biosolids." This seemingly innocuous name change represents the heart of a fierce debate about how we should manage human waste. Is it a valuable resource that can nourish agricultural land, or a toxic mixture that threatens public health? The answer remains contentious after decades of scientific studies and public controversy. The biosolids industry promotes land application as a sustainable solution to waste management. Treated sewage solids contain nitrogen, phosphorus, and organic matter - essential nutrients for plant growth. In Alexandria, Virginia, the sanitation authority produces "Class A Exceptional Quality" biosolids through a sophisticated process involving centrifuges and heat treatment to kill pathogens. The resulting material resembles rich, crumbly soil and is provided to farmers as free fertilizer. Proponents argue this approach completes a natural nutrient cycle: food feeds humans, whose waste then feeds more food. Critics, however, point to serious concerns about what else might be in biosolids. Modern sewage contains not just human waste but industrial chemicals, pharmaceutical residues, heavy metals, and pathogens. The EPA's regulations (known as the "Part 503 rules") only limit nine heavy metals in biosolids, ignoring thousands of other potential contaminants. Nancy Holt, who lives near a field where Class B biosolids are applied in North Carolina, believes the practice has caused serious health problems in her community, including respiratory issues, staph infections, and cancer clusters. The scientific community remains divided. A National Academy of Sciences report acknowledged that "there is no documented scientific evidence that the Part 503 rules have failed to protect public health" but also noted that "additional scientific work is needed to reduce persistent uncertainty about the potential for adverse human health effects from exposure to biosolids." Several EPA scientists who helped develop the regulations have since become critics, with one famously describing the assumption that toxic chemicals in sludge would be captured and neutralized by soil as "sludge magic." The biosolids controversy reflects broader questions about risk assessment, scientific uncertainty, and the precautionary principle. European countries like Switzerland and the Netherlands have banned agricultural use of sewage sludge due to concerns about persistent contaminants, while the United States continues to promote land application. As one Cornell University scientist observed, "There is no such thing as 'safe.' The question really is, 'Is the risk acceptable?'" For now, that question remains unanswered, with farmers, communities, and regulators continuing to navigate the complex terrain where waste management meets agriculture.
Chapter 5: Open Defecation: Health Impacts and Cultural Challenges
Every day, an estimated 1.1 billion people worldwide practice open defecation - relieving themselves in fields, forests, beaches, streets, or other open spaces. In India alone, approximately 200,000 tons of human feces are deposited in the open daily, creating what Sulabh International describes as the equivalent of "the entire European population sitting on their haunches from the Elbe in the east to the Pyrenees in the west." This practice represents not just a lack of infrastructure but a complex interplay of cultural norms, poverty, and inadequate public policy. The health consequences of open defecation are devastating. Human feces left in the open become breeding grounds for disease-causing pathogens. Flies land on excrement, then on food. Rain washes waste into water sources. Children play in contaminated areas and put their hands in their mouths. This creates perfect conditions for the transmission of diarrheal diseases, intestinal worms, and other infections. Studies show that in areas where open defecation is common, children are shorter, weaker, and more vulnerable to disease - a condition researchers call "stunting." The practice effectively creates a cycle of disease and malnutrition that can persist across generations. Women and girls bear disproportionate burdens from open defecation. Cultural norms around modesty force them to seek privacy by defecating only before dawn or after dusk, making them vulnerable to sexual assault and animal attacks. Many women and girls deliberately reduce their food and water intake to avoid needing to relieve themselves during daylight hours, leading to dehydration, urinary tract infections, and chronic constipation. In schools without adequate facilities, girls often drop out when they begin menstruating, perpetuating educational inequality. Ending open defecation requires more than simply building toilets. In India, government programs have constructed millions of latrines, yet many remain unused. Cultural preferences, caste dynamics, and deeply ingrained habits all influence sanitation behaviors. Some communities view defecation as a natural activity best done in the open air. Others associate toilets with impurity and refuse to have them near living spaces. In some regions, traditional beliefs hold that sharing a toilet with people of different castes or families is spiritually polluting. Successful sanitation programs address these cultural dimensions through community engagement rather than top-down infrastructure projects. Organizations like Sulabh International in India and CLTS (Community-Led Total Sanitation) initiatives worldwide have demonstrated that behavior change requires triggering emotional responses - often through shame, disgust, or pride - followed by community-led solutions. When communities themselves declare their determination to become "open defecation free," sustainable change becomes possible.
Chapter 6: Sustainable Solutions: From Biogas to Ecological Sanitation
The conventional flush toilet, while convenient, represents an inherently unsustainable approach to sanitation. It uses clean drinking water to transport waste, then requires expensive infrastructure and energy-intensive processes to treat that water again. In a world facing water scarcity and resource depletion, alternative approaches that recover nutrients and reduce environmental impact are gaining traction. Biogas systems offer one promising solution, particularly in rural areas. In China, over 15 million rural households connect their toilets to biogas digesters - sealed containers where human and animal waste ferments in an oxygen-free environment. Microorganisms break down the organic material, producing methane gas that can be used for cooking, lighting, and heating. The remaining slurry serves as nutrient-rich fertilizer for crops. This approach transforms waste from a problem into a valuable resource while reducing deforestation (as families no longer need to collect firewood) and improving indoor air quality. The impact on rural women's lives can be transformative. In the Chinese village of Da Li, women previously spent hours each day cooking over smoky wood fires, causing respiratory problems and eye irritation. After installing biogas digesters, they gained time for income-generating activities like weaving and field work. As one villager expressed in a poem: "Cooking is easy with biogas / Relieves us women with big problem / Four generations of the family can now dine together." The technology also improves sanitation by safely containing excrement that previously contaminated yards and water sources. Ecological sanitation (EcoSan) systems take resource recovery further by separating urine from feces. Urine contains most of the nutrients excreted by humans - nitrogen, phosphorus, and potassium - in a relatively sterile form. When collected separately, it can be used as fertilizer after minimal treatment. Feces, which contain most pathogens but fewer nutrients, can be composted into safe soil conditioner. This approach recognizes human waste as a misplaced resource rather than something to be disposed of. In urban areas, innovations like vacuum toilets and composting systems offer water-saving alternatives to conventional sewerage. The city of Lille, France, has converted buses to run on biomethane derived from municipal sewage, demonstrating how waste can power transportation. Meanwhile, decentralized treatment systems allow neighborhoods to manage waste locally rather than relying on distant treatment plants and extensive sewer networks. These sustainable approaches face significant barriers, including cultural resistance, regulatory frameworks designed for conventional systems, and the massive sunk costs in existing infrastructure. However, as water scarcity intensifies and the environmental costs of conventional sanitation become clearer, ecological alternatives are likely to move from the margins to the mainstream of sanitation planning.
Chapter 7: The Economic Case: How Sanitation Drives Development
Sanitation is not merely a health intervention but a powerful economic driver. The World Health Organization estimates that every dollar invested in sanitation generates an average return of $5.50 through reduced healthcare costs, increased productivity, and fewer premature deaths. Despite this compelling economic case, sanitation remains chronically underfunded compared to other development priorities. The costs of poor sanitation manifest in multiple ways. Healthcare systems bear the burden of treating preventable diseases like diarrhea, intestinal worms, and trachoma. In Peru, when cholera broke out in 1991, the cost to contain the epidemic reached $1 billion - ten times what the country had spent on sanitation in the previous decade. Beyond direct medical expenses, families affected by sanitation-related illness face catastrophic costs for treatment and lost income when breadwinners cannot work. Children miss school, compromising their education and future earning potential. Productivity losses from inadequate sanitation are substantial. Adults with chronic intestinal parasites often experience fatigue and weakness that reduce their work capacity. Women and girls collectively spend billions of hours annually seeking private places to defecate or collecting water for hygiene - time that could otherwise be spent on education or income-generating activities. In India alone, the World Bank estimates that inadequate sanitation costs the economy approximately $54 billion annually, equivalent to 6.4% of GDP. Tourism and property values also suffer in areas with poor sanitation. Cities with visible open defecation and inadequate public facilities struggle to attract visitors and investment. In contrast, communities that invest in sanitation often see property values rise and new businesses emerge. In rural Australia, installing public toilets along highways has proven economically beneficial for small towns, as travelers stop longer and spend more money locally. Despite these economic benefits, sanitation receives disproportionately little political attention. As one expert observed, "Politicians will run on a platform of water for all or houses for all, but you've never seen one run on a campaign of sanitation for all." This neglect stems partly from cultural taboos around discussing human waste and partly from the invisibility of sanitation infrastructure. Water supply projects offer politicians photo opportunities at gushing taps, while sanitation improvements remain underground or behind closed doors. The economic argument for sanitation becomes even more compelling when considering future challenges. Phosphorus, a critical nutrient found in human waste and essential for agriculture, faces potential global shortages within decades. Ecological sanitation systems that recover phosphorus from excreta could help address this looming crisis while providing economic benefits. Similarly, biogas production from human waste offers energy security benefits in regions facing fossil fuel constraints.
Summary
The hidden world of human waste management reveals a fundamental truth: how societies handle excrement reflects their values, technological capabilities, and social structures. The global sanitation crisis represents not primarily a technical challenge but a failure of priority-setting and taboo-breaking. When 2.6 billion people lack basic sanitation while space agencies spend millions perfecting zero-gravity toilets, we confront profound questions about resource allocation and human dignity. The most effective solutions emerge when communities are engaged as active participants rather than passive recipients, when waste is treated as a resource rather than a problem, and when approaches are adapted to local contexts rather than imposed from outside. Looking forward, the sanitation landscape will be shaped by increasing urbanization, water scarcity, and climate change. These challenges demand innovation across technical, social, and institutional dimensions. Can ecological sanitation systems scale to serve dense urban populations? Will resource recovery from human waste become economically competitive with conventional fertilizers? How might digital technologies improve service delivery in informal settlements? For curious readers, exploring these questions offers insight not just into waste management but into sustainable development, public health, and environmental justice. The future of sanitation depends on our willingness to break the silence around this essential aspect of human existence.
Best Quote
“This is why the Liberian waiter laughed at me. He thought that I thought a toilet was my right, when he knew it was a privilege."It must be, when 2.6 billion people don't have sanitation. I don't mean that they have no toilet in their house and must use a public one with queues and fees. Or that they have an outhouse, or a ricety shack that empties into a filthy drain or pigsty. All that counts as sanitation, though not a safe variety. The people who have those are the fortunate ones. Four in ten people have no access to any latrine, toilet, bucket, or box. Nothing. Instead, they defecate by train tracks and in forests. They do it in plastic bags and fling them through the air in narrow slum alleyways. If they are women, they get up at 4 A.M. to be able to do their business under cover of darkness for reasons of modesty, risking rape and snakebites. Four in ten people live in situations where they are surrounded by human excrement because it is in the bushes outside the village or in their city yards, left by children outside the backdoor. It is tramped back in on their feet, carried on fingers onto clothes, food and drinking water."The disease toll of this is stunning. A gram of feces can contain 10 million viruses, 1 million bacteria, 1,000 parasite cysts, and 100 worm eggs...” ― Rose George, The Big Necessity: The Unmentionable World of Human Waste and Why It Matters
Review Summary
Strengths: The review highlights the book's educational and thought-provoking nature, emphasizing its value for those interested in public health, city planning, and related fields. It praises the author, Rose George, for providing a sober examination of a crucial public health issue, supported by statistics without overwhelming the narrative.\nOverall Sentiment: Enthusiastic\nKey Takeaway: "The Big Necessity" is a well-regarded public health book that offers a comprehensive and informative exploration of how various cultures manage human waste, making it a valuable read for those interested in public health and related sectors.
Trending Books
Download PDF & EPUB
To save this Black List summary for later, download the free PDF and EPUB. You can print it out, or read offline at your convenience.

The Big Necessity
By Rose George










